Normalized to: Zhan, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.15386 [pdf] - 2129460
Search For Electron-Antineutrinos Associated With Gravitational-Wave
Events GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and
GW170817 at Daya Bay
An, F. P.;
Balantekin, A. B.;
Band, H. R.;
Bishai, M.;
Blyth, S.;
Cao, G. F.;
Cao, J.;
Chang, J. F.;
Chang, Y.;
Chen, H. S.;
Chen, S. M.;
Chen, Y.;
Chen, Y. X.;
Cheng, J.;
Cheng, Z. K.;
Cherwinka, J. J.;
Chu, M. C.;
Cummings, J. P.;
Dalager, O.;
Deng, F. S.;
Ding, Y. Y.;
Diwan, M. V.;
Dohnal, T.;
Dove, J.;
Dvorak, M.;
Dwyer, D. A.;
Gallo, J. P.;
Gonchar, M.;
Gong, G. H.;
Gong, H.;
Gu, W. Q.;
Guo, J. Y.;
Guo, L.;
Guo, X. H.;
Guo, Y. H.;
Guo, Z.;
Hackenburg, R. W.;
Hans, S.;
He, M.;
Heeger, K. M.;
Heng, Y. K.;
Higuera, A.;
Hor, Y. K.;
Hsiung, Y. B.;
Hu, B. Z.;
Hu, J. R.;
Hu, T.;
Hu, Z. J.;
Huang, H. X.;
Huang, X. T.;
Huang, Y. B.;
Huber, P.;
Jaffe, D. E.;
Jen, K. L.;
Ji, X. L.;
Ji, X. P.;
Johnson, R. A.;
Jones, D.;
Kang, L.;
Kettell, S. H.;
Kohn, S.;
Kramer, M.;
Langford, T. J.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, J. H. C.;
Lei, R. T.;
Leitner, R.;
Leung, J. K. C.;
Li, F.;
Li, J. J.;
Li, Q. J.;
Li, S.;
Li, S. C.;
Li, W. D.;
Li, X. N.;
Li, X. Q.;
Li, Y. F.;
Li, Z. B.;
Liang, H.;
Lin, C. J.;
Lin, G. L.;
Lin, S.;
Ling, J. J.;
Link, J. M.;
Littenberg, L.;
Littlejohn, B. R.;
Liu, J. C.;
Liu, J. L.;
Lu, C.;
Lu, H. Q.;
Lu, J. S.;
Luk, K. B.;
Ma, X. B.;
Ma, X. Y.;
Ma, Y. Q.;
Marshall, C.;
Caicedo, D. A. Martinez;
McDonald, K. T.;
McKeown, R. D.;
Meng, Y.;
Napolitano, J.;
Naumov, D.;
Naumova, E.;
Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P.;
Olshevskiy, A.;
Pan, H. -R.;
Park, J.;
Patton, S.;
Peng, J. C.;
Pun, C. S. J.;
Qi, F. Z.;
Qi, M.;
Qian, X.;
Raper, N.;
Ren, J.;
Reveco, C. Morales;
Rosero, R.;
Roskovec, B.;
Ruan, X. C.;
Steiner, H.;
Sun, J. L.;
Tmej, T.;
Treskov, K.;
Tse, W. -H.;
Tull, C. E.;
Viren, B.;
Vorobel, V.;
Wang, C. H.;
Wang, J.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, N. Y.;
Wang, R. G.;
Wang, W.;
Wang, W.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Y.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Wang, Z.;
Wang, Z.;
Wang, Z. M.;
Wei, H. Y.;
Wei, L. H.;
Wen, L. J.;
Whisnant, K.;
White, C. G.;
Wong, H. L. H.;
Worcester, E.;
Wu, D. R.;
Wu, F. L.;
Wu, Q.;
Wu, W. J.;
Xia, D. M.;
Xie, Z. Q.;
Xing, Z. Z.;
Xu, J. L.;
Xu, T.;
Xue, T.;
Yang, C. G.;
Yang, L.;
Yang, Y. Z.;
Yao, H. F.;
Ye, M.;
Yeh, M.;
Young, B. L.;
Yu, H. Z.;
Yu, Z. Y.;
Yue, B. B.;
Zeng, S.;
Zeng, Y.;
Zhan, L.;
Zhang, C.;
Zhang, F. Y.;
Zhang, H. H.;
Zhang, J. W.;
Zhang, Q. M.;
Zhang, X. T.;
Zhang, Y. M.;
Zhang, Y. X.;
Zhang, Y. Y.;
Zhang, Z. J.;
Zhang, Z. P.;
Zhang, Z. Y.;
Zhao, J.;
Zhou, L.;
Zhuang, H. L.;
Zou, J. H.
Submitted: 2020-06-27, last modified: 2020-07-07
Providing a possible connection between neutrino emission and
gravitational-wave (GW) bursts is important to our understanding of the
physical processes that occur when black holes or neutron stars merge. In the
Daya Bay experiment, using data collected from December 2011 to August 2017, a
search has been performed for electron-antineutrino signals coinciding with
detected GW events, including GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608,
GW170814, and GW170817. We used three time windows of $\mathrm{\pm 10~s}$,
$\mathrm{\pm 500~s}$, and $\mathrm{\pm 1000~s}$ relative to the occurrence of
the GW events, and a neutrino energy range of 1.8 to 100 MeV to search for
correlated neutrino candidates. The detected electron-antineutrino candidates
are consistent with the expected background rates for all the three time
windows. Assuming monochromatic spectra, we found upper limits (90% confidence
level) on electron-antineutrino fluence of $(1.13~-~2.44) \times
10^{11}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ at 5 MeV to $8.0 \times 10^{7}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ at 100 MeV
for the three time windows. Under the assumption of a Fermi-Dirac spectrum, the
upper limits were found to be $(5.4~-~7.0)\times 10^{9}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ for the
three time windows.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.4174 [pdf] - 1171448
Solar-cycle related variation of solar differential rotation
Submitted: 2013-05-16
Solar-cycle related variation of differential rotation is investigated
through analyzing the rotation rates of magnetic fields, distributed along
latitudes and varying with time at the time interval of August 1976 to April
2008. More pronounced differentiation of rotation rates is found to appear at
the ascending part of a Schwabe cycle than at the descending part on an
average. The coefficient $B$ in the standard form of differential rotation,
which represents the latitudinal gradient of rotation, may be divided into
three parts within a Schwabe cycle. Part one spans from the start to the
$4^{th}$ year of a Schwabe cycle, within which the absolute $B$ is
approximately a constant or slightly fluctuates. Part two spans from the
$4^{th}$ to the $7^{th}$ year, within which the absolute $B$ decreases. Part
three spans from the $7^{th}$ year to the end, within which the absolute $B$
increases. Strong magnetic fields repress differentiation of rotation rates, so
that rotation rates show less pronounced differentiation, but weak magnetic
fields seem to just reflect differentiation of rotation rates. The solar-cycle
related variation of solar differential rotation is inferred to the result of
both the latitudinal migration of the surface torsional pattern and the
repression of strong magnetic activity to differentiation of rotation rates.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.0819 [pdf] - 1092709
Why isn't the solar constant a constant?
Submitted: 2012-01-03
In order to probe the mechanism of variations of the Solar Constant on the
inter-solar-cycle scale, total solar irradiance (TSI, the so-called Solar
Constant) in the time interval of 7 November 1978 to 20 September 2010 is
decomposed into three components through the empirical mode decomposition and
time-frequency analyses. The first component is the rotation signal, counting
up to 42.31% of the total variation of TSI, which is understood to be mainly
caused by large magnetic structures, including sunspot groups. The second is an
annual-variation signal, counting up to 15.17% of the total variation, the
origin of which is not known at this point in time. Finally, the third is the
inter-solar-cycle signal, counting up to 42.52%, which are inferred to be
caused by the network magnetic elements in quiet regions, whose magnetic flux
ranges from $(4.27-38.01)\times10^{19}$ Mx.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.2727 [pdf] - 364111
Neutron-gamma discrimination of CsI(Na) crystals for dark matter
searches
Sun, Xilei;
Lu, Junguang;
Hu, Tao;
Zhou, Li;
Cao, Jun;
Wang, Yifang;
Zhan, Liang;
Yu, Boxiang;
Cai, Xiao;
Fang, Jian;
Xie, Yuguang;
An, Zhenghua;
Wang, Zhigang;
Xue, Zhen;
Lu, Qiwen;
Ning, Feipeng;
Ge, Yongshuai;
Liu, Yingbiao
Submitted: 2011-02-14
The luminescent properties of CsI(Na) crystals are studied in this report. By
using a TDS3054C oscilloscope with a sampling frequency of 5 GS/s, we find out
that nuclear recoil signals are dominated by very fast light pulse with a decay
time of ~20 ns, while {\gamma}-ray signals have a decay time of ~600 ns. The
wavelength of nuclear recoil and {\gamma}-ray signals are also different. The
study of n/{\gamma} separation shows that the rejection factor can reach an
order of 10-7 with signal efficiency more than 80% at an equivalent electron
recoil energy of 20 keV or more. Such a property makes CsI(Na) an ideal
candidate for dark matter searches.