Normalized to: Tuo, Z.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.0961 [pdf] - 690035
Constraining the Anisotropic Expansion of Universe
Submitted: 2013-03-05, last modified: 2013-07-09
We study the possibly existing anisotropy in the accelerating expansion
universe with the Union2 Type Ia supernovae data and Gamma-ray burst data. We
construct a direction-dependent dark energy model and constrain the anisotropy
direction and strength of modulation. We find that the maximum anisotropic
deviation direction is $(l,\,b)=(126^{\circ},\,13^{\circ})$ (or equivalently
$(l,\,b)=(306^{\circ},\,-13^{\circ})$), and the current anisotropy level is
$g_0=0.030_{+0.010}^{-0.030}$ ($1\sigma$ confidence level with Union2 data).
Our results do not show strong evidence for the anisotropic dark energy model.
We also discuss potential methods that may distinguish the peculiar velocity
field from the anisotropic dark energy model.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.0941 [pdf] - 567081
Direction Dependence of the Deceleration Parameter
Submitted: 2011-09-05, last modified: 2012-09-25
In this paper we study the possibly existing anisotropy in the acceleration
expansion by use of the full sample of Union2 data. Using the hemisphere
comparison method to search for a preferred direction, we take the deceleration
parameter q0 as the diagnostic to quantify the anisotropy level in the wCDM
model. We find that the maximum accelerating expansion direction is
$(l,b)=(314_{+20^{\circ}}^{\circ-13^{\circ}},28_{+11^{\circ}}^{\circ-33^{\circ}})$,with
the maximum anisotropy level of $\delta
q_{0,max}/\bar{q}_0=0.79_{+0.27}^{-0.28}$, and that the anisotropy is more
prominent when only low redshift data ($z\leq0.2$) are used. We also discuss
this issue in the $CPL$ parameterized model, showing a similar result.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.2494 [pdf] - 567093
More on QCD Ghost Dark Energy
Submitted: 2012-01-12, last modified: 2012-09-25
The difference between vacuum energy of quantum fields in Minkowski space and
in Friedmann-Robterson-Walker universe might be related to the observed dark
energy. The vacuum energy of the Veneziano ghost field introduced to solve the
$U(1)_A$ problem in QCD is of the form, $ H+ {\cal O}(H^2)$. Based on this, we
study the dynamical evolution of a phenomenological dark energy model whose
energy density is of the form $\alpha H+\beta H^2$. In this model, the universe
approaches to a de Sitter phase at late times. We fit the model with current
observational data including SnIa, BAO, CMB, BBN, Hubble parameter and growth
rate of matter perturbation. It shows that the universe begins to accelerate at
redshift $z\sim 0.75$ and this model is consistent with current data. In
particular, this model fits the data of growth factor well as the $\Lambda CDM$
model.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.1603 [pdf] - 1076486
Detecting the cosmic acceleration with current data
Submitted: 2011-05-09, last modified: 2012-09-25
The deceleration parameter q as the diagnostic of the cosmological
accelerating expansion is investigated. By expanding the luminosity distance to
the fourth order of redshift and the so-called y-redshift in two redshift bins
and fitting the SNIa data (Union2), the marginalized likelihood distribution of
the current deceleration parameter shows that the cosmic acceleration is still
increasing, but there might be a tendency that the cosmic acceleration will
slow down in the near future. We also fit the Hubble evolution data together
with SNIa data by expanding the Hubble parameter to the third order, showing
that the present decelerating expansion is excluded within $2\sigma$ error.
Further exploration on this problem is also approached in a non-parametrization
method by directly reconstructing the deceleration parameter from the distance
modulus of SNIa, which depends neither on the validity of general relativity
nor on the content of the universe or any assumption regarding cosmological
parameters. More accurate observation datasets and more effective methods are
still in need to make a clear answer on whether the cosmic acceleration will
keep increasing or not.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.2846 [pdf] - 669634
Figure of Merit and Different Combinations of Observational Data Sets
Submitted: 2011-09-13, last modified: 2011-11-08
To constrain cosmological parameters, one often makes a joint analysis with
different combinations of observational data sets. In this paper we take the
figure of merit (FoM) for Dark Energy Task Force fiducial model (CPL model) to
estimate goodness of different combinations of data sets, which include 11
widely-used observational data sets (Type Ia Supernovae, Observational Hubble
Parameter, Baryon Acoustic Oscillation, Cosmic Microwave Background, X-ray
Cluster Baryon Mass Fraction, and Gamma-Ray Bursts). We analyze different
combinations and make a comparison for two types of combination based on two
types of basic combinations, which are often adopted in the literatures. We
find two sets of combinations, which have strong ability to constrain the dark
energy parameters, one has the largest FoM, the other contains less
observational data with a relative large FoM and a simple fitting procedure.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.3212 [pdf] - 1041954
Notes on Ghost Dark Energy
Submitted: 2010-11-14, last modified: 2010-12-13
We study a phenomenological dark energy model which is rooted in the
Veneziano ghost of QCD. In this dark energy model, the energy density of dark
energy is proportional to Hubble parameter and the proportional coefficient is
of the order $\Lambda^3_{QCD}$, where $\Lambda_{QCD}$ is the mass scale of QCD.
The universe has a de Sitter phase at late time and begins to accelerate at
redshift around $z_{acc}\sim0.6$. We also fit this model and give the
constraints on model parameters, with current observational data including
SnIa, BAO, CMB, BBN and Hubble parameter data. We find that the squared sound
speed of the dark energy is negative, which may cause an instability. We also
study the cosmological evolution of the dark energy with interaction with cold
dark matter.