sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Ni, Wei-Tou

Normalized to: Ni, W.

64 article(s) in total. 1520 co-authors, from 1 to 20 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2002.12628  [pdf] - 2131874
Numerical simulation of sky localization for LISA-TAIJI joint observation
Comments: 18 pages, 12 figures; accepted for publication in PRD
Submitted: 2020-02-28, last modified: 2020-07-10
LISA is considered to be launched alongside the Athena to probe the energetic astrophysical processes. LISA can determine the direction of sources for Athena's follow-up observation. As another space gravitational wave mission, TAIJI is expected to be launched in the 2030s. The LISA-TAIJI network would provide abundant merits for sources understanding. In this work, we simulate the joint LISA-TAIJI observations for gravitational waves from coalescing supermassive black hole binaries and monochromatic sources. By using the numerical mission orbits, we evaluate the performances of sky localization for various time-delay interferometry channels. For 30 days observation until coalescence, the LISA-TAIJI network in optimal operation can localize all simulated binary sources, $(10^7,\ 3.3 \times 10^6)\ M_\odot$, $(10^6,\ 3.3 \times 10^5)\ M_\odot$ and $(10^5,\ 3.3 \times 10^4)\ M_\odot$ at redshift $z=2$, in 0.4 deg$^2$ (field of view of Wide Field Imager on Athena). The angular resolution can be improved by more than 10 times comparing to LISA or TAIJI single detector at a given percentage of population. The improvements for monochromatic sources at 3 mHz and 10 mHz are relatively moderate in one-year observation. The precision of sky localization could be improved by around 1 to 3 times comparing to single LISA at a given percentage of sources. For a simulated 90 days observation for monochromatic waves, the LISA-TAIJI network still represents a considerable localization advantage which could be more than 10 times better.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.05574  [pdf] - 2127475
Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history
Akutsu, T.; Ando, M.; Arai, K.; Arai, Y.; Araki, S.; Araya, A.; Aritomi, N.; Aso, Y.; Bae, S. -W.; Bae, Y. -B.; Baiotti, L.; Bajpai, R.; Barton, M. A.; Cannon, K.; Capocasa, E.; Chan, M. -L.; Chen, C. -S.; Chen, K. -H.; Chen, Y. -R.; Chu, H. -Y.; Chu, Y-K.; Eguchi, S.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujii, Y.; Fukunaga, M.; Fukushima, M.; Ge, G. -G.; Hagiwara, A.; Haino, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Hayakawa, H.; Hayama, K.; Himemoto, Y.; Hiranuma, Y.; Hirata, N.; Hirose, E.; Hong, Z.; Hsieh, B. -H.; Huang, G. -Z.; Huang, P. -W.; Huang, Y. -J.; Ikenoue, B.; Imam, S.; Inayoshi, K.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Itoh, Y.; Izumi, K.; Jung, K.; Jung, P.; Kajita, T.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanda, N.; Kang, G. -W.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawai, N.; Kawasaki, T.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, W.; Kim, Y. -M.; Kimura, N.; Kita, N.; Kitazawa, H.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kong, A. K. H.; Kotake, K.; Kozakai, C.; Kozu, R.; Kumar, R.; Kume, J.; Kuo, C. -M.; Kuo, H. -S.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Kusayanagi, K.; Kwak, K.; Lee, H. -K.; Lee, H. -W.; Lee, R. -K.; Leonardi, M.; Lin, C. -Y.; Lin, F. -L.; Lin, L. C. -C.; Liu, G. -C.; Luo, L. -W.; Marchio, M.; Michimura, Y.; Mio, N.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyazaki, Y.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Nagano, K.; Nagano, S.; Nakamura, K.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakashima, R.; Narikawa, T.; Negishi, R.; Ni, W. -T.; Nishizawa, A.; Obuchi, Y.; Ogaki, W.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, S. -H.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Okutomi, K.; Oohara, K.; Ooi, C. -P.; Oshino, S.; Pan, K. -C.; Pang, H. -F.; Park, J.; Arellano, F. E. Peña; Pinto, I.; Sago, N.; Saito, S.; Saito, Y.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, Y.; Sakuno, Y.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sawada, T.; Sekiguchi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Shibagaki, S.; Shimizu, R.; Shimoda, T.; Shimode, K.; Shinkai, H.; Shishido, T.; Shoda, A.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Sotani, H.; Sugimoto, R.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tagoshi, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takano, S.; Takeda, H.; Takeda, M.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, T.; Tanioka, S.; Martin, E. N. Tapia San; Telada, S.; Tomaru, T.; Tomigami, Y.; Tomura, T.; Travasso, F.; Trozzo, L.; Tsang, T. T. L.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Tsuzuki, T.; Tuyenbayev, D.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Ueda, A.; Uehara, T.; Ueno, K.; Ueshima, G.; Uraguchi, F.; Ushiba, T.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; Vocca, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, C. -M.; Wu, H. -C.; Wu, S. -R.; Xu, W. -R.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, Ka.; Yamamoto, Ko.; Yamamoto, T.; Yokogawa, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoshioka, T.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Z. -H.
Comments: 33 pages, 10 figures
Submitted: 2020-05-12, last modified: 2020-07-02
KAGRA is a newly built gravitational-wave telescope, a laser interferometer comprising arms with a length of 3\,km, located in Kamioka, Gifu, Japan. KAGRA was constructed under the ground and it is operated using cryogenic mirrors that help in reducing the seismic and thermal noise. Both technologies are expected to provide directions for the future of gravitational-wave telescopes. In 2019, KAGRA finished all installations with the designed configuration, which we call the baseline KAGRA. In this occasion, we present an overview of the baseline KAGRA from various viewpoints in a series of of articles. In this article, we introduce the design configurations of KAGRA with its historical background.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.03013  [pdf] - 2105542
Application of the independent component analysis to the iKAGRA data
KAGRA Collaboration; Akutsu, T.; Ando, M.; Arai, K.; Arai, Y.; Araki, S.; Araya, A.; Aritomi, N.; Asada, H.; Aso, Y.; Atsuta, S.; Awai, K.; Bae, S.; Bae, Y.; Baiotti, L.; Bajpai, R.; Barton, M. A.; Cannon, K.; Capocasa, E.; Chan, M.; Chen, C.; Chen, K.; Chen, Y.; Chu, H.; Chu, Y-K.; Craig, K.; Creus, W.; Doi, K.; Eda, K.; Eguchi, S.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujii, Y.; Fujimoto, M. -K.; Fukunaga, M.; Fukushima, M.; Furuhata, T.; Ge, G.; Hagiwara, A.; Haino, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Hashino, K.; Hayakawa, H.; Hayama, K.; Himemoto, Y.; Hiranuma, Y.; Hirata, N.; Hirobayashi, S.; Hirose, E.; Hong, Z.; Hsieh, B. H.; Huang, G-Z.; Huang, P.; Huang, Y.; Ikenoue, B.; Imam, S.; Inayoshi, K.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Itoh, Y.; Izumi, K.; Jung, K.; Jung, P.; Kaji, T.; Kajita, T.; Kakizaki, M.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanbara, S.; Kanda, N.; Kanemura, S.; Kaneyama, M.; Kang, G.; Kasuya, J.; Kataoka, Y.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawai, N.; Kawamura, S.; Kawasaki, T.; Kim, C.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, W. S.; Kim, Y. -M.; Kimura, N.; Kinugawa, T.; Kirii, S.; Kita, N.; Kitaoka, Y.; Kitazawa, H.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kong, A. K. H.; Kotake, K.; Kozakai, C.; Kozu, R.; Kumar, R.; Kume, J.; Kuo, C.; Kuo, H-S.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Kusayanagi, K.; Kwak, K.; Lee, H. K.; Lee, H. M.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, R.; Leonardi, M.; Lin, C.; Lin, C-Y.; Lin, F-L.; Liu, G. C.; Liu, Y.; Luo, L.; Majorana, E.; Mano, S.; Marchio, M.; Matsui, T.; Matsushima, F.; Michimura, Y.; Mio, N.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyamoto, T.; Miyazaki, Y.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Morii, W.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Morozumi, T.; Musha, M.; Nagano, K.; Nagano, S.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakao, K.; Nakashima, R.; Narikawa, T.; Naticchioni, L.; Negishi, R.; Quynh, L. Nguyen; Ni, W. -T.; Nishizawa, A.; Obuchi, Y.; Ochi, T.; Ogaki, W.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, S. H.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Okutomi, K.; Oohara, K.; Ooi, C. P.; Oshino, S.; Pan, K.; Pang, H.; Park, J.; Arellano, F. E. Pena; Pinto, I.; Sago, N.; Saijo, M.; Saito, S.; Saito, Y.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Sakuno, Y.; Sasaki, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sawada, T.; Sekiguchi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Seto, N.; Shibagaki, S.; Shibata, M.; Shimizu, R.; Shimoda, T.; Shimode, K.; Shinkai, H.; Shishido, T.; Shoda, A.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Sotani, H.; Suemasa, A.; Sugimoto, R.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tagoshi, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takano, S.; Takeda, H.; Takeda, M.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, T.; Tanioka, S.; Martin, E. N. Tapia San; Tatsumi, D.; Telada, S.; Tomaru, T.; Tomigami, Y.; Tomura, T.; Travasso, F.; Trozzo, L.; Tsang, T.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Tsuzuki, T.; Tuyenbayev, D.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Ueda, A.; Uehara, T.; Ueki, S.; Ueno, K.; Ueshima, G.; Uraguchi, F.; Ushiba, T.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; Vocca, H.; Wada, S.; Wakamatsu, T.; Wang, J.; Wu, C.; Wu, H.; Wu, S.; Xu, W-R.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Yokogawa, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoon, T. H.; Yoshioka, T.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Z. -H.
Comments: 27 pages, 12 figures : published in PTEP with added discussion about the relation between ICA and Wiener filtering
Submitted: 2019-08-08, last modified: 2020-06-01
We apply the independent component analysis (ICA) to the real data from a gravitational wave detector for the first time. Specifically we use the iKAGRA data taken in April 2016, and calculate the correlations between the gravitational wave strain channel and 35 physical environmental channels. Using a couple of seismic channels which are found to be strongly correlated with the strain, we perform ICA. Injecting a sinusoidal continuous signal in the strain channel, we find that ICA recovers correct parameters with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio, which demonstrates usefulness of this method. Among the two implementations of ICA used here, we find the correlation method yields the optimal result for the case environmental noises act on the strain channel linearly.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:2004.05590  [pdf] - 2131887
Mid-Frequency Gravitational Wave Detection and Sources
Comments: reference update and minor corrections
Submitted: 2020-04-12, last modified: 2020-04-14
A brief history and various themes of mid-frequency gravitational wave detection are presented more or less following historical order -- Laser Interferometry, Atom Interferometry (AI), Torsion Bar Antenna (TOBA), and Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory (SOGRO). Both Earth-based and Space-borne concepts are reviewed with outlook on expected astrophysical sources
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1304.0670  [pdf] - 2031895
Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration; the Virgo Collaboration; the KAGRA Collaboration; Abbott, B. P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T. D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adya, V. B.; Affeldt, C.; Agathos, M.; Agatsuma, K.; Aggarwal, N.; Aguiar, O. D.; Aiello, L.; Ain, A.; Ajith, P.; Akutsu, T.; Allen, G.; Allocca, A.; Aloy, M. A.; Altin, P. A.; Amato, A.; Ananyeva, A.; Anderson, S. B.; Anderson, W. G.; Ando, M.; Angelova, S. V.; Antier, S.; Appert, S.; Arai, K.; Arai, Koya; Arai, Y.; Araki, S.; Araya, A.; Araya, M. C.; Areeda, J. S.; Arène, M.; Aritomi, N.; Arnaud, N.; Arun, K. G.; Ascenzi, S.; Ashton, G.; Aso, Y.; Aston, S. M.; Astone, P.; Aubin, F.; Aufmuth, P.; AultONeal, K.; Austin, C.; Avendano, V.; Avila-Alvarez, A.; Babak, S.; Bacon, P.; Badaracco, F.; Bader, M. K. M.; Bae, S. W.; Bae, Y. B.; Baiotti, L.; Bajpai, R.; Baker, P. T.; Baldaccini, F.; Ballardin, G.; Ballmer, S. W.; Banagiri, S.; Barayoga, J. C.; Barclay, S. E.; Barish, B. C.; Barker, D.; Barkett, K.; Barnum, S.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsotti, L.; Barsuglia, M.; Barta, D.; Bartlett, J.; Barton, M. A.; Bartos, I.; Bassiri, R.; Basti, A.; Bawaj, M.; Bayley, J. C.; Bazzan, M.; Bécsy, B.; Bejger, M.; Belahcene, I.; Bell, A. S.; Beniwal, D.; Berger, B. K.; Bergmann, G.; Bernuzzi, S.; Bero, J. J.; Berry, C. P. L.; Bersanetti, D.; Bertolini, A.; Betzwieser, J.; Bhandare, R.; Bidler, J.; Bilenko, I. A.; Bilgili, S. A.; Billingsley, G.; Birch, J.; Birney, R.; Birnholtz, O.; Biscans, S.; Biscoveanu, S.; Bisht, A.; Bitossi, M.; Bizouard, M. A.; Blackburn, J. K.; Blair, C. D.; Blair, D. G.; Blair, R. M.; Bloemen, S.; Bode, N.; Boer, M.; Boetzel, Y.; Bogaert, G.; Bondu, F.; Bonilla, E.; Bonnand, R.; Booker, P.; Boom, B. A.; Booth, C. D.; Bork, R.; Boschi, V.; Bose, S.; Bossie, K.; Bossilkov, V.; Bosveld, J.; Bouffanais, Y.; Bozzi, A.; Bradaschia, C.; Brady, P. R.; Bramley, A.; Branchesi, M.; Brau, J. E.; Briant, T.; Briggs, J. H.; Brighenti, F.; Brillet, A.; Brinkmann, M.; Brisson, V.; Brockill, P.; Brooks, A. F.; Brown, D. A.; Brown, D. D.; Brunett, S.; Buikema, A.; Bulik, T.; Bulten, H. J.; Buonanno, A.; Buskulic, D.; Buy, C.; Byer, R. L.; Cabero, M.; Cadonati, L.; Cagnoli, G.; Cahillane, C.; Bustillo, J. Calderón; Callister, T. A.; Calloni, E.; Camp, J. B.; Campbell, W. A.; Canepa, M.; Cannon, K.; Cannon, K. C.; Cao, H.; Cao, J.; Capocasa, E.; Carbognani, F.; Caride, S.; Carney, M. F.; Carullo, G.; Diaz, J. Casanueva; Casentini, C.; Caudill, S.; Cavaglià, M.; Cavalier, F.; Cavalieri, R.; Cella, G.; Cerdá-Durán, P.; Cerretani, G.; Cesarini, E.; Chaibi, O.; Chakravarti, K.; Chamberlin, S. J.; Chan, M.; Chan, M. L.; Chao, S.; Charlton, P.; Chase, E. A.; Chassande-Mottin, E.; Chatterjee, D.; Chaturvedi, M.; Chatziioannou, K.; Cheeseboro, B. D.; Chen, C. S.; Chen, H. Y.; Chen, K. H.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y. R.; Cheng, H. -P.; Cheong, C. K.; Chia, H. Y.; Chincarini, A.; Chiummo, A.; Cho, G.; Cho, H. S.; Cho, M.; Christensen, N.; Chu, H. Y.; Chu, Q.; Chu, Y. K.; Chua, S.; Chung, K. W.; Chung, S.; Ciani, G.; Ciobanu, A. A.; Ciolfi, R.; Cipriano, F.; Cirone, A.; Clara, F.; Clark, J. A.; Clearwater, P.; Cleva, F.; Cocchieri, C.; Coccia, E.; Cohadon, P. -F.; Cohen, D.; Colgan, R.; Colleoni, M.; Collette, C. G.; Collins, C.; Cominsky, L. R.; Constancio, M.; Conti, L.; Cooper, S. J.; Corban, P.; Corbitt, T. R.; Cordero-Carrión, I.; Corley, K. R.; Cornish, N.; Corsi, A.; Cortese, S.; Costa, C. A.; Cotesta, R.; Coughlin, M. W.; Coughlin, S. B.; Coulon, J. -P.; Countryman, S. T.; Couvares, P.; Covas, P. B.; Cowan, E. E.; Coward, D. M.; Cowart, M. J.; Coyne, D. C.; Coyne, R.; Creighton, J. D. E.; Creighton, T. D.; Cripe, J.; Croquette, M.; Crowder, S. G.; Cullen, T. J.; Cumming, A.; Cunningham, L.; Cuoco, E.; Canton, T. Dal; Dálya, G.; Danilishin, S. L.; D'Antonio, S.; Danzmann, K.; Dasgupta, A.; Costa, C. F. Da Silva; Datrier, L. E. H.; Dattilo, V.; Dave, I.; Davier, M.; Davis, D.; Daw, E. J.; DeBra, D.; Deenadayalan, M.; Degallaix, J.; De Laurentis, M.; Deléglise, S.; Del Pozzo, W.; DeMarchi, L. M.; Demos, N.; Dent, T.; De Pietri, R.; Derby, J.; De Rosa, R.; De Rossi, C.; DeSalvo, R.; de Varona, O.; Dhurandhar, S.; Díaz, M. C.; Dietrich, T.; Di Fiore, L.; Di Giovanni, M.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Lieto, A.; Ding, B.; Di Pace, S.; Di Palma, I.; Di Renzo, F.; Dmitriev, A.; Doctor, Z.; Doi, K.; Donovan, F.; Dooley, K. L.; Doravari, S.; Dorrington, I.; Downes, T. P.; Drago, M.; Driggers, J. C.; Du, Z.; Ducoin, J. -G.; Dupej, P.; Dwyer, S. E.; Easter, P. J.; Edo, T. B.; Edwards, M. C.; Effler, A.; Eguchi, S.; Ehrens, P.; Eichholz, J.; Eikenberry, S. S.; Eisenmann, M.; Eisenstein, R. A.; Enomoto, Y.; Essick, R. C.; Estelles, H.; Estevez, D.; Etienne, Z. B.; Etzel, T.; Evans, M.; Evans, T. M.; Fafone, V.; Fair, H.; Fairhurst, S.; Fan, X.; Farinon, S.; Farr, B.; Farr, W. M.; Fauchon-Jones, E. J.; Favata, M.; Fays, M.; Fazio, M.; Fee, C.; Feicht, J.; Fejer, M. M.; Feng, F.; Fernandez-Galiana, A.; Ferrante, I.; Ferreira, E. C.; Ferreira, T. A.; Ferrini, F.; Fidecaro, F.; Fiori, I.; Fiorucci, D.; Fishbach, M.; Fisher, R. P.; Fishner, J. M.; Fitz-Axen, M.; Flaminio, R.; Fletcher, M.; Flynn, E.; Fong, H.; Font, J. A.; Forsyth, P. W. F.; Fournier, J. -D.; Frasca, S.; Frasconi, F.; Frei, Z.; Freise, A.; Frey, R.; Frey, V.; Fritschel, P.; Frolov, V. V.; Fujii, Y.; Fukunaga, M.; Fukushima, M.; Fulda, P.; Fyffe, M.; Gabbard, H. A.; Gadre, B. U.; Gaebel, S. M.; Gair, J. R.; Gammaitoni, L.; Ganija, M. R.; Gaonkar, S. G.; Garcia, A.; García-Quirós, C.; Garufi, F.; Gateley, B.; Gaudio, S.; Gaur, G.; Gayathri, V.; Ge, G. G.; Gemme, G.; Genin, E.; Gennai, A.; George, D.; George, J.; Gergely, L.; Germain, V.; Ghonge, S.; Ghosh, Abhirup; Ghosh, Archisman; Ghosh, S.; Giacomazzo, B.; Giaime, J. A.; Giardina, K. D.; Giazotto, A.; Gill, K.; Giordano, G.; Glover, L.; Godwin, P.; Goetz, E.; Goetz, R.; Goncharov, B.; González, G.; Castro, J. M. Gonzalez; Gopakumar, A.; Gorodetsky, M. L.; Gossan, S. E.; Gosselin, M.; Gouaty, R.; Grado, A.; Graef, C.; Granata, M.; Grant, A.; Gras, S.; Grassia, P.; Gray, C.; Gray, R.; Greco, G.; Green, A. C.; Green, R.; Gretarsson, E. M.; Groot, P.; Grote, H.; Grunewald, S.; Gruning, P.; Guidi, G. M.; Gulati, H. K.; Guo, Y.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, M. K.; Gustafson, E. K.; Gustafson, R.; Haegel, L.; Hagiwara, A.; Haino, S.; Halim, O.; Hall, B. R.; Hall, E. D.; Hamilton, E. Z.; Hammond, G.; Haney, M.; Hanke, M. M.; Hanks, J.; Hanna, C.; Hannam, M. D.; Hannuksela, O. A.; Hanson, J.; Hardwick, T.; Haris, K.; Harms, J.; Harry, G. M.; Harry, I. W.; Hasegawa, K.; Haster, C. -J.; Haughian, K.; Hayakawa, H.; Hayama, K.; Hayes, F. J.; Healy, J.; Heidmann, A.; Heintze, M. C.; Heitmann, H.; Hello, P.; Hemming, G.; Hendry, M.; Heng, I. S.; Hennig, J.; Heptonstall, A. W.; Heurs, M.; Hild, S.; Himemoto, Y.; Hinderer, T.; Hiranuma, Y.; Hirata, N.; Hirose, E.; Hoak, D.; Hochheim, S.; Hofman, D.; Holgado, A. M.; Holland, N. A.; Holt, K.; Holz, D. E.; Hong, Z.; Hopkins, P.; Horst, C.; Hough, J.; Howell, E. J.; Hoy, C. G.; Hreibi, A.; Hsieh, B. H.; Huang, G. Z.; Huang, P. W.; Huang, Y. J.; Huerta, E. A.; Huet, D.; Hughey, B.; Hulko, M.; Husa, S.; Huttner, S. H.; Huynh-Dinh, T.; Idzkowski, B.; Iess, A.; Ikenoue, B.; Imam, S.; Inayoshi, K.; Ingram, C.; Inoue, Y.; Inta, R.; Intini, G.; Ioka, K.; Irwin, B.; Isa, H. N.; Isac, J. -M.; Isi, M.; Itoh, Y.; Iyer, B. R.; Izumi, K.; Jacqmin, T.; Jadhav, S. J.; Jani, K.; Janthalur, N. N.; Jaranowski, P.; Jenkins, A. C.; Jiang, J.; Johnson, D. S.; Jones, A. W.; Jones, D. I.; Jones, R.; Jonker, R. J. G.; Ju, L.; Jung, K.; Jung, P.; Junker, J.; Kajita, T.; Kalaghatgi, C. V.; Kalogera, V.; Kamai, B.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanda, N.; Kandhasamy, S.; Kang, G. W.; Kanner, J. B.; Kapadia, S. J.; Karki, S.; Karvinen, K. S.; Kashyap, R.; Kasprzack, M.; Katsanevas, S.; Katsavounidis, E.; Katzman, W.; Kaufer, S.; Kawabe, K.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawai, N.; Kawasaki, T.; Keerthana, N. V.; Kéfélian, F.; Keitel, D.; Kennedy, R.; Key, J. S.; Khalili, F. Y.; Khan, H.; Khan, I.; Khan, S.; Khan, Z.; Khazanov, E. A.; Khursheed, M.; Kijbunchoo, N.; Kim, Chunglee; Kim, C.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.; Kim, W.; Kim, W. S.; Kim, Y. -M.; Kimball, C.; Kimura, N.; King, E. J.; King, P. J.; Kinley-Hanlon, M.; Kirchhoff, R.; Kissel, J. S.; Kita, N.; Kitazawa, H.; Kleybolte, L.; Klika, J. H.; Klimenko, S.; Knowles, T. D.; Koch, P.; Koehlenbeck, S. M.; Koekoek, G.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Koley, S.; Komori, K.; Kondrashov, V.; Kong, A. K. H.; Kontos, A.; Koper, N.; Korobko, M.; Korth, W. Z.; Kotake, K.; Kowalska, I.; Kozak, D. B.; Kozakai, C.; Kozu, R.; Kringel, V.; Krishnendu, N.; Królak, A.; Kuehn, G.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, Rahul; Kumar, R.; Kumar, S.; Kume, J.; Kuo, C. M.; Kuo, H. S.; Kuo, L.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Kusayanagi, K.; Kutynia, A.; Kwak, K.; Kwang, S.; Lackey, B. D.; Lai, K. H.; Lam, T. L.; Landry, M.; Lane, B. B.; Lang, R. N.; Lange, J.; Lantz, B.; Lanza, R. K.; Lartaux-Vollard, A.; Lasky, P. D.; Laxen, M.; Lazzarini, A.; Lazzaro, C.; Leaci, P.; Leavey, S.; Lecoeuche, Y. K.; Lee, C. H.; Lee, H. K.; Lee, H. M.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, J.; Lee, K.; Lee, R. K.; Lehmann, J.; Lenon, A.; Leonardi, M.; Leroy, N.; Letendre, N.; Levin, Y.; Li, J.; Li, K. J. L.; Li, T. G. F.; Li, X.; Lin, C. Y.; Lin, F.; Lin, F. L.; Lin, L. C. C.; Linde, F.; Linker, S. D.; Littenberg, T. B.; Liu, G. C.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Lo, R. K. L.; Lockerbie, N. A.; London, L. T.; Longo, A.; Lorenzini, M.; Loriette, V.; Lormand, M.; Losurdo, G.; Lough, J. D.; Lousto, C. O.; Lovelace, G.; Lower, M. E.; Lück, H.; Lumaca, D.; Lundgren, A. P.; Luo, L. W.; Lynch, R.; Ma, Y.; Macas, R.; Macfoy, S.; MacInnis, M.; Macleod, D. M.; Macquet, A.; Magaña-Sandoval, F.; Zertuche, L. Magaña; Magee, R. M.; Majorana, E.; Maksimovic, I.; Malik, A.; Man, N.; Mandic, V.; Mangano, V.; Mansell, G. L.; Manske, M.; Mantovani, M.; Marchesoni, F.; Marchio, M.; Marion, F.; Márka, S.; Márka, Z.; Markakis, C.; Markosyan, A. S.; Markowitz, A.; Maros, E.; Marquina, A.; Marsat, S.; Martelli, F.; Martin, I. W.; Martin, R. M.; Martynov, D. V.; Mason, K.; Massera, E.; Masserot, A.; Massinger, T. J.; Masso-Reid, M.; Mastrogiovanni, S.; Matas, A.; Matichard, F.; Matone, L.; Mavalvala, N.; Mazumder, N.; McCann, J. J.; McCarthy, R.; McClelland, D. E.; McCormick, S.; McCuller, L.; McGuire, S. C.; McIver, J.; McManus, D. J.; McRae, T.; McWilliams, S. T.; Meacher, D.; Meadors, G. D.; Mehmet, M.; Mehta, A. K.; Meidam, J.; Melatos, A.; Mendell, G.; Mercer, R. A.; Mereni, L.; Merilh, E. L.; Merzougui, M.; Meshkov, S.; Messenger, C.; Messick, C.; Metzdorff, R.; Meyers, P. M.; Miao, H.; Michel, C.; Michimura, Y.; Middleton, H.; Mikhailov, E. E.; Milano, L.; Miller, A. L.; Miller, A.; Millhouse, M.; Mills, J. C.; Milovich-Goff, M. C.; Minazzoli, O.; Minenkov, Y.; Mio, N.; Mishkin, A.; Mishra, C.; Mistry, T.; Mitra, S.; Mitrofanov, V. P.; Mitselmakher, G.; Mittleman, R.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyazaki, Y.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Mo, G.; Moffa, D.; Mogushi, K.; Mohapatra, S. R. P.; Montani, M.; Moore, C. J.; Moraru, D.; Moreno, G.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Mours, B.; Mow-Lowry, C. M.; Mukherjee, Arunava; Mukherjee, D.; Mukherjee, S.; Mukund, N.; Mullavey, A.; Munch, J.; Muñiz, E. A.; Muratore, M.; Murray, P. G.; Nagano, K.; Nagano, S.; Nagar, A.; Nakamura, K.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakashima, R.; Nardecchia, I.; Narikawa, T.; Naticchioni, L.; Nayak, R. K.; Negishi, R.; Neilson, J.; Nelemans, G.; Nelson, T. J. N.; Nery, M.; Neunzert, A.; Ng, K. Y.; Ng, S.; Nguyen, P.; Ni, W. T.; Nichols, D.; Nishizawa, A.; Nissanke, S.; Nocera, F.; North, C.; Nuttall, L. K.; Obergaulinger, M.; Oberling, J.; O'Brien, B. D.; Obuchi, Y.; O'Dea, G. D.; Ogaki, W.; Ogin, G. H.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, S. H.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Ohme, F.; Ohta, H.; Okada, M. A.; Okutomi, K.; Oliver, M.; Oohara, K.; Ooi, C. P.; Oppermann, P.; Oram, Richard J.; O'Reilly, B.; Ormiston, R. G.; Ortega, L. F.; O'Shaughnessy, R.; Oshino, S.; Ossokine, S.; Ottaway, D. J.; Overmier, H.; Owen, B. J.; Pace, A. E.; Pagano, G.; Page, M. A.; Pai, A.; Pai, S. A.; Palamos, J. R.; Palashov, O.; Palomba, C.; Pal-Singh, A.; Pan, Huang-Wei; Pan, K. C.; Pang, B.; Pang, H. F.; Pang, P. T. H.; Pankow, C.; Pannarale, F.; Pant, B. C.; Paoletti, F.; Paoli, A.; Papa, M. A.; Parida, A.; Park, J.; Parker, W.; Pascucci, D.; Pasqualetti, A.; Passaquieti, R.; Passuello, D.; Patil, M.; Patricelli, B.; Pearlstone, B. L.; Pedersen, C.; Pedraza, M.; Pedurand, R.; Pele, A.; Arellano, F. E. Peña; Penn, S.; Perez, C. J.; Perreca, A.; Pfeiffer, H. P.; Phelps, M.; Phukon, K. S.; Piccinni, O. J.; Pichot, M.; Piergiovanni, F.; Pillant, G.; Pinard, L.; Pinto, I.; Pirello, M.; Pitkin, M.; Poggiani, R.; Pong, D. Y. T.; Ponrathnam, S.; Popolizio, P.; Porter, E. K.; Powell, J.; Prajapati, A. K.; Prasad, J.; Prasai, K.; Prasanna, R.; Pratten, G.; Prestegard, T.; Privitera, S.; Prodi, G. A.; Prokhorov, L. G.; Puncken, O.; Punturo, M.; Puppo, P.; Pürrer, M.; Qi, H.; Quetschke, V.; Quinonez, P. J.; Quintero, E. A.; Quitzow-James, R.; Raab, F. J.; Radkins, H.; Radulescu, N.; Raffai, P.; Raja, S.; Rajan, C.; Rajbhandari, B.; Rakhmanov, M.; Ramirez, K. E.; Ramos-Buades, A.; Rana, Javed; Rao, K.; Rapagnani, P.; Raymond, V.; Razzano, M.; Read, J.; Regimbau, T.; Rei, L.; Reid, S.; Reitze, D. H.; Ren, W.; Ricci, F.; Richardson, C. J.; Richardson, J. W.; Ricker, P. M.; Riles, K.; Rizzo, M.; Robertson, N. A.; Robie, R.; Robinet, F.; Rocchi, A.; Rolland, L.; Rollins, J. G.; Roma, V. J.; Romanelli, M.; Romano, R.; Romel, C. L.; Romie, J. H.; Rose, K.; Rosińska, D.; Rosofsky, S. G.; Ross, M. P.; Rowan, S.; Rüdiger, A.; Ruggi, P.; Rutins, G.; Ryan, K.; Sachdev, S.; Sadecki, T.; Sago, N.; Saito, S.; Saito, Y.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, Y.; Sakamoto, H.; Sakellariadou, M.; Sakuno, Y.; Salconi, L.; Saleem, M.; Samajdar, A.; Sammut, L.; Sanchez, E. J.; Sanchez, L. E.; Sanchis-Gual, N.; Sandberg, V.; Sanders, J. R.; Santiago, K. A.; Sarin, N.; Sassolas, B.; Sathyaprakash, B. S.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sauter, O.; Savage, R. L.; Sawada, T.; Schale, P.; Scheel, M.; Scheuer, J.; Schmidt, P.; Schnabel, R.; Schofield, R. M. S.; Schönbeck, A.; Schreiber, E.; Schulte, B. W.; Schutz, B. F.; Schwalbe, S. G.; Scott, J.; Scott, S. M.; Seidel, E.; Sekiguchi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Sellers, D.; Sengupta, A. S.; Sennett, N.; Sentenac, D.; Sequino, V.; Sergeev, A.; Setyawati, Y.; Shaddock, D. A.; Shaffer, T.; Shahriar, M. S.; Shaner, M. B.; Shao, L.; Sharma, P.; Shawhan, P.; Shen, H.; Shibagaki, S.; Shimizu, R.; Shimoda, T.; Shimode, K.; Shink, R.; Shinkai, H.; Shishido, T.; Shoda, A.; Shoemaker, D. H.; Shoemaker, D. M.; ShyamSundar, S.; Siellez, K.; Sieniawska, M.; Sigg, D.; Silva, A. D.; Singer, L. P.; Singh, N.; Singhal, A.; Sintes, A. M.; Sitmukhambetov, S.; Skliris, V.; Slagmolen, B. J. J.; Slaven-Blair, T. J.; Smith, J. R.; Smith, R. J. E.; Somala, S.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Sorazu, B.; Sorrentino, F.; Sotani, H.; Souradeep, T.; Sowell, E.; Spencer, A. P.; Srivastava, A. K.; Srivastava, V.; Staats, K.; Stachie, C.; Standke, M.; Steer, D. A.; Steinke, M.; Steinlechner, J.; Steinlechner, S.; Steinmeyer, D.; Stevenson, S. P.; Stocks, D.; Stone, R.; Stops, D. J.; Strain, K. A.; Stratta, G.; Strigin, S. E.; Strunk, A.; Sturani, R.; Stuver, A. L.; Sudhir, V.; Sugimoto, R.; Summerscales, T. Z.; Sun, L.; Sunil, S.; Suresh, J.; Sutton, P. J.; Suzuki, Takamasa; Suzuki, Toshikazu; Swinkels, B. L.; Szczepańczyk, M. J.; Tacca, M.; Tagoshi, H.; Tait, S. C.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takano, S.; Takeda, H.; Takeda, M.; Talbot, C.; Talukder, D.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, Kazuyuki; Tanaka, Kenta; Tanaka, Taiki; Tanaka, Takahiro; Tanioka, S.; Tanner, D. B.; Tápai, M.; Martin, E. N. Tapia San; Taracchini, A.; Tasson, J. D.; Taylor, R.; Telada, S.; Thies, F.; Thomas, M.; Thomas, P.; Thondapu, S. R.; Thorne, K. A.; Thrane, E.; Tiwari, Shubhanshu; Tiwari, Srishti; Tiwari, V.; Toland, K.; Tomaru, T.; Tomigami, Y.; Tomura, T.; Tonelli, M.; Tornasi, Z.; Torres-Forné, A.; Torrie, C. I.; Töyrä, D.; Travasso, F.; Traylor, G.; Tringali, M. C.; Trovato, A.; Trozzo, L.; Trudeau, R.; Tsang, K. W.; Tsang, T. T. L.; Tse, M.; Tso, R.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Tsukada, L.; Tsuna, D.; Tsuzuki, T.; Tuyenbayev, D.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Ueda, A.; Uehara, T.; Ueno, K.; Ueshima, G.; Ugolini, D.; Unnikrishnan, C. S.; Uraguchi, F.; Urban, A. L.; Ushiba, T.; Usman, S. A.; Vahlbruch, H.; Vajente, G.; Valdes, G.; van Bakel, N.; van Beuzekom, M.; Brand, J. F. J. van den; Broeck, C. Van Den; Vander-Hyde, D. C.; van der Schaaf, L.; van Heijningen, J. V.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; van Veggel, A. A.; Vardaro, M.; Varma, V.; Vass, S.; Vasúth, M.; Vecchio, A.; Vedovato, G.; Veitch, J.; Veitch, P. J.; Venkateswara, K.; Venugopalan, G.; Verkindt, D.; Vetrano, F.; Viceré, A.; Viets, A. D.; Vine, D. J.; Vinet, J. -Y.; Vitale, S.; Vivanco, Francisco Hernandez; Vo, T.; Vocca, H.; Vorvick, C.; Vyatchanin, S. P.; Wade, A. R.; Wade, L. E.; Wade, M.; Walet, R.; Walker, M.; Wallace, L.; Walsh, S.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. Z.; Wang, W. H.; Wang, Y. F.; Ward, R. L.; Warden, Z. A.; Warner, J.; Was, M.; Watchi, J.; Weaver, B.; Wei, L. -W.; Weinert, M.; Weinstein, A. J.; Weiss, R.; Wellmann, F.; Wen, L.; Wessel, E. K.; Weßels, P.; Westhouse, J. W.; Wette, K.; Whelan, J. T.; Whiting, B. F.; Whittle, C.; Wilken, D. M.; Williams, D.; Williamson, A. R.; Willis, J. L.; Willke, B.; Wimmer, M. H.; Winkler, W.; Wipf, C. C.; Wittel, H.; Woan, G.; Woehler, J.; Wofford, J. K.; Worden, J.; Wright, J. L.; Wu, C. M.; Wu, D. S.; Wu, H. C.; Wu, S. R.; Wysocki, D. M.; Xiao, L.; Xu, W. R.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, Kazuhiro; Yamamoto, Kohei; Yamamoto, T.; Yancey, C. C.; Yang, L.; Yap, M. J.; Yazback, M.; Yeeles, D. W.; Yokogawa, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoshioka, T.; Yu, Hang; Yu, Haocun; Yuen, S. H. R.; Yuzurihara, H.; Yvert, M.; Zadrożny, A. K.; Zanolin, M.; Zeidler, S.; Zelenova, T.; Zendri, J. -P.; Zevin, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, Z.; Zhu, X. J.; Zhu, Z. H.; Zimmerman, A. B.; Zucker, M. E.; Zweizig, J.
Comments: 52 pages, 9 figures, 5 tables. We have updated the detector sensitivities (including the A+ and AdV+ upgrade); added expectations for binary black-holes, neutron-star black-holes, and intermediate-mass black holes; and added 3D volume localization expectations. This update is to change some numbers in Table 5 based on refinements to the simulations. Three authors were added
Submitted: 2013-04-02, last modified: 2020-01-14
We present our current best estimate of the plausible observing scenarios for the Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA gravitational-wave detectors over the next several years, with the intention of providing information to facilitate planning for multi-messenger astronomy with gravitational waves. We estimate the sensitivity of the network to transient gravitational-wave signals for the third (O3), fourth (O4) and fifth observing (O5) runs, including the planned upgrades of the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. We study the capability of the network to determine the sky location of the source for gravitational-wave signals from the inspiral of binary systems of compact objects, that is BNS, NSBH, and BBH systems. The ability to localize the sources is given as a sky-area probability, luminosity distance, and comoving volume. The median sky localization area (90\% credible region) is expected to be a few hundreds of square degrees for all types of binary systems during O3 with the Advanced LIGO and Virgo (HLV) network. The median sky localization area will improve to a few tens of square degrees during O4 with the Advanced LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA (HLVK) network. We evaluate sensitivity and localization expectations for unmodeled signal searches, including the search for intermediate mass black hole binary mergers.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.00955  [pdf] - 2030547
An arm length stabilization system for KAGRA and future gravitational-wave detectors
Akutsu, T.; Ando, M.; Arai, K.; Arai, K.; Arai, Y.; Araki, S.; Araya, A.; Aritomi, N.; Aso, Y.; Bae, S.; Bae, Y.; Baiotti, L.; Bajpai, R.; Barton, M. A.; Cannon, K.; Capocasa, E.; Chan, M.; Chen, C.; Chen, K.; Chen, Y.; Chu, H.; Chu, Y-K.; Doi, K.; Eguchi, S.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujii, Y.; Fukunaga, M.; Fukushima, M.; Ge, G.; Hagiwara, A.; Haino, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Hayakawa, H.; Hayama, K.; Himemoto, Y.; Hiranuma, Y.; Hirata, N.; Hirose, E.; Hong, Z.; Hsieh, B. H.; Huang, G-Z.; Huang, P.; Huang, Y.; Ikenoue, B.; Imam, S.; Inayoshi, K.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Itoh, Y.; Izumi, K.; Jung, K.; Jung, P.; Kajita, T.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanbara, S.; Kanda, N.; Kang, G.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawai, N.; Kawasaki, T.; Kim, C.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, W. S.; Kim, Y. -M.; Kimura, N.; Kita, N.; Kitazawa, H.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kong, A. K. H.; Kotake, K.; Kozakai, C.; Kozu, R.; Kumar, R.; Kume, J.; Kuo, C.; Kuo, H-S.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Kusayanagi, K.; Kwak, K.; Lee, H. K.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, R.; Leonardi, M.; Lin, L. C. -C.; Lin, C-Y.; Lin, F-L.; Liu, G. C.; Luo, L. -W.; Marchio, M.; Michimura, Y.; Mio, N.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyazaki, Y.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Musha, M.; Nagano, K.; Nagano, S.; Nakamura, K.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakashima, R.; Narikawa, T.; Negishi, R.; Ni, W. -T.; Nishizawa, A.; Obuchi, Y.; Ogaki, W.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, S. H.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Ohmae, N.; Okutomi, K.; Oohara, K.; Ooi, C. P.; Oshino, S.; Pan, K.; Pang, H.; Park, J.; Arellano, F. E. Peña; Pinto, I.; Sago, N.; Saito, S.; Saito, Y.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, Y.; Sakuno, Y.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sawada, T.; Sekiguchi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Shibagaki, S.; Shimizu, R.; Shimoda, T.; Shimode, K.; Shinkai, H.; Shishido, T.; Shoda, A.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Sotani, H.; Sugimoto, R.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tagoshi, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takano, S.; Takeda, H.; Takeda, M.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, T.; Tanioka, S.; Martin, E. N. Tapia San; Tatsumi, D.; Telada, S.; Tomaru, T.; Tomigami, Y.; Tomura, T.; Travasso, F.; Trozzo, L.; Tsang, T.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Tsuzuki, T.; Tuyenbayev, D.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Ueda, A.; Uehara, T.; Ueno, K.; Ueshima, G.; Uraguchi, F.; Ushiba, T.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; Vocca, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, C.; Wu, H.; Wu, S.; Xu, W-R.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Yokogawa, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoshioka, T.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Z. -H.
Comments: 21 pages, 8figures
Submitted: 2019-10-02, last modified: 2019-11-28
Modern ground-based gravitational wave (GW) detectors require a complex interferometer configuration with multiple coupled optical cavities. Since achieving the resonances of the arm cavities is the most challenging among the lock acquisition processes, the scheme called arm length stabilization (ALS) had been employed for lock acquisition of the arm cavities. We designed a new type of the ALS, which is compatible with the interferometers having long arms like the next generation GW detectors. The features of the new ALS are that the control configuration is simpler than those of previous ones and that it is not necessary to lay optical fibers for the ALS along the kilometer-long arms of the detector. Along with simulations of its noise performance, an experimental test of the new ALS was performed utilizing a single arm cavity of KAGRA. This paper presents the first results of the test where we demonstrated that lock acquisition of the arm cavity was achieved using the new ALS and residual noise was measured to be $8.2\,\mathrm{Hz}$ in units of frequency, which is smaller than the linewidth of the arm cavity and thus low enough to lock the full interferometer of KAGRA in a repeatable and reliable manner.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.04995  [pdf] - 2131846
Astrodynamical middle-frequency interferometric gravitational wave observatory AMIGO: Mission concept and orbit design
Comments: 29 pages, 21 figures, 6 tables. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1709.05659
Submitted: 2019-09-11
AMIGO is a first-generation Astrodynamical Middle-frequency Interferometric GW Observatory. The scientific goals of AMIGO are: to bridge the spectra gap between first-generation high-frequency and low-frequency GW sensitivities; to detect intermediate mass BH coalescence; to detect inspiral phase and predict time of binary black hole coalescence together with neutron star coalescence for ground interferometers; to detect compact binary inspirals for studying stellar evolution and galactic population. The mission concept is to use time delay interferometry for a nearly triangular formation of 3 drag-free spacecraft with nominal arm length 10,000 km, emitting laser power 2-10 W and telescope diameter 300-500 mm. The design GW sensitivity in the middle frequency band is 3 x 10^(-21) Hz^(-1/2). Both heliocentric and geocentric orbits are under study. All options have LISA-like formations, that is the triangular formation is 60 deg inclined to the orbit plane. For AMIGO, the first-generation time delay interferometry is good enough for the laser frequency noise suppression. We also investigate for each options of orbits under study, whether constant equal-arm implementation is feasible. For the solar-orbit option, the acceleration to maintain the formation can be designed to be less than 15 nm/s2 with the thruster requirement in the 15 {\mu}N range. AMIGO would be a good place to implement the constant equal-arm option. Fuel requirement, thruster noise requirement and test mass acceleration actuation requirement are briefly considered. From the orbit study, the solar orbit option is the first mission orbit choice. We study the deployment for this orbit option. A last-stage launch from 300 km LEO (Low Earth Orbit) to an appropriate 2-degree-behind-the-Earth AMIGO formation in 95 days requires only a {\delta}v of 75 m/s.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.03569  [pdf] - 1979528
First cryogenic test operation of underground km-scale gravitational-wave observatory KAGRA
KAGRA Collaboration; Akutsu, T.; Ando, M.; Arai, K.; Arai, Y.; Araki, S.; Araya, A.; Aritomi, N.; Asada, H.; Aso, Y.; Atsuta, S.; Awai, K.; Bae, S.; Baiotti, L.; Barton, M. A.; Cannon, K.; Capocasa, E.; Chen, C-S.; Chiu, T-W.; Cho, K.; Chu, Y-K.; Craig, K.; Creus, W.; Doi, K.; Eda, K.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujii, Y.; Fujimoto, M. -K.; Fukunaga, M.; Fukushima, M.; Furuhata, T.; Hagiwara, A.; Haino, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Hashino, K.; Hayama, K.; Hirobayashi, S.; Hirose, E.; Hsieh, B. H.; Huang, C-Z.; Ikenoue, B.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Itoh, Y.; Izumi, K.; Kaji, T.; Kajita, T.; Kakizaki, M.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanbara, S.; Kanda, N.; Kanemura, S.; Kaneyama, M.; Kang, G.; Kasuya, J.; Kataoka, Y.; Kawai, N.; Kawamura, S.; Kawasaki, T.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, W. S.; Kim, Y. -M.; Kimura, N.; Kinugawa, T.; Kirii, S.; Kitaoka, Y.; Kitazawa, H.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kong, A. K. H.; Kotake, K.; Kozu, R.; Kumar, R.; Kuo, H-S.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Lee, H. K.; Lee, H. M.; Lee, H. W.; Leonardi, M.; Lin, C-Y.; Lin, F-L.; Liu, G. C.; Liu, Y.; Majorana, E.; Mano, S.; Marchio, M.; Matsui, T.; Matsushima, F.; Michimura, Y.; Mio, N.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyamoto, T.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Morii, W.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Morozumi, T.; Murakami, I.; Musha, M.; Nagano, K.; Nagano, S.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakao, K.; Namai, Y.; Narikawa, T.; Naticchioni, L.; Quynh, L. Nguyen; Ni, W. -T.; Nishizawa, A.; Obuchi, Y.; Ochi, T.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, S. H.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Okutomi, K.; Ono, K.; Oohara, K.; Ooi, C. P.; Pan, S-S.; Park, J.; Arellano, F. E. Peña; Pinto, I.; Sago, N.; Saijo, M.; Saito, Y.; Saitou, S.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Sasai, M.; Sasaki, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Sato, N.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Seto, N.; Shibata, M.; Shimoda, T.; Shinkai, H.; Shishido, T.; Shoda, A.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Suemasa, A.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tagoshi, H.; Tahara, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takeda, H.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tanioka, S.; Martin, E. N. Tapia San; Tatsumi, D.; Terashima, S.; Tomaru, T.; Tomura, T.; Travasso, F.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Ueda, A.; Uehara, T.; Ueki, S.; Ueno, K.; Uraguchi, F.; Ushiba, T.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; Vocca, H.; Wada, S.; Wakamatsu, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Xu, W-R.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Yokogawa, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoon, T. H.; Yoshioka, T.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhu, Z. -H.
Comments: 23 pages, 11 figures
Submitted: 2019-01-11
KAGRA is a second-generation interferometric gravitational-wave detector with 3-km arms constructed at Kamioka, Gifu in Japan. It is now in its final installation phase, which we call bKAGRA (baseline KAGRA), with scientific observations expected to begin in late 2019. One of the advantages of KAGRA is its underground location of at least 200 m below the ground surface, which brings small seismic motion at low frequencies and high stability of the detector. Another advantage is that it cools down the sapphire test mass mirrors to cryogenic temperatures to reduce thermal noise. In April-May 2018, we have operated a 3-km Michelson interferometer with a cryogenic test mass for 10 days, which was the first time that km-scale interferometer was operated at cryogenic temperatures. In this article, we report the results of this "bKAGRA Phase 1" operation. We have demonstrated the feasibility of 3-km interferometer alignment and control with cryogenic mirrors.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.08079  [pdf] - 1979518
KAGRA: 2.5 Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector
Akutsu, T.; Ando, M.; Arai, K.; Arai, Y.; Araki, S.; Araya, A.; Aritomi, N.; Asada, H.; Aso, Y.; Atsuta, S.; Awai, K.; Bae, S.; Baiotti, L.; Barton, M. A.; Cannon, K.; Capocasa, E.; Chen, C-S.; Chiu, T-W.; Cho, K.; Chu, Y-K.; Craig, K.; Creus, W.; Doi, K.; Eda, K.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujii, Y.; Fujimoto, M. -K.; Fukunaga, M.; Fukushima, M.; Furuhata, T.; Haino, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Hashino, K.; Hayama, K.; Hirobayashi, S.; Hirose, E.; Hsieh, B. H.; Huang, C-Z.; Ikenoue, B.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Itoh, Y.; Izumi, K.; Kaji, T.; Kajita, T.; Kakizaki, M.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanbara, S.; Kanda, N.; Kanemura, S.; Kaneyama, M.; Kang, G.; Kasuya, J.; Kataoka, Y.; Kawai, N.; Kawamura, S.; Kawasaki, T.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, W. S.; Kim, Y. -M.; Kimura, N.; Kinugawa, T.; Kirii, S.; Kitaoka, Y.; Kitazawa, H.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kong, A. K. H.; Kotake, K.; Kozu, R.; Kumar, R.; Kuo, H-S.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Lee, H. K.; Lee, H. M.; Lee, H. W.; Leonardi, M.; Lin, C-Y.; Lin, F-L.; Liu, G. C.; Liu, Y.; Majorana, E.; Mano, S.; Marchio, M.; Matsui, T.; Matsushima, F.; Michimura, Y.; Mio, N.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyamoto, T.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Morii, W.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Morozumi, T.; Musha, M.; Nagano, K.; Nagano, S.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakao, K.; Narikawa, T.; Naticchioni, L.; Quynh, L. Nguyen; Ni, W. -T.; Nishizawa, A.; Ochi, T.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, S. H.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Okutomi, K.; Ono, K.; Oohara, K.; Ooi, C. P.; Pan, S-S.; Park, J.; Arellano, F. E. Peña; Pinto, I.; Sago, N.; Saijo, M.; Saito, Y.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Sasai, M.; Sasaki, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Seto, N.; Shibata, M.; Shimoda, T.; Shinkai, H.; Shishido, T.; Shoda, A.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Suemasa, A.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tagoshi, H.; Tahara, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takeda, H.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tanioka, S.; Martin, E. N. Tapia San; Tatsumi, D.; Tomaru, T.; Tomura, T.; Travasso, F.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Uehara, T.; Ueki, S.; Ueno, K.; Ushiba, T.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; Vocca, H.; Wada, S.; Wakamatsu, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Xu, W-R.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Yokogawa, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoon, T. H.; Yoshioka, T.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhu, Z. -H.
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures (quality of some figures has been reduced)
Submitted: 2018-11-20
The recent detections of gravitational waves (GWs) reported by LIGO/Virgo collaborations have made significant impact on physics and astronomy. A global network of GW detectors will play a key role to solve the unknown nature of the sources in coordinated observations with astronomical telescopes and detectors. Here we introduce KAGRA (former name LCGT; Large-scale Cryogenic Gravitational wave Telescope), a new GW detector with two 3-km baseline arms arranged in the shape of an "L", located inside the Mt. Ikenoyama, Kamioka, Gifu, Japan. KAGRA's design is similar to those of the second generations such as Advanced LIGO/Virgo, but it will be operating at the cryogenic temperature with sapphire mirrors. This low temperature feature is advantageous for improving the sensitivity around 100 Hz and is considered as an important feature for the third generation GW detector concept (e.g. Einstein Telescope of Europe or Cosmic Explorer of USA). Hence, KAGRA is often called as a 2.5 generation GW detector based on laser interferometry. The installation and commissioning of KAGRA is underway and its cryogenic systems have been successfully tested in May, 2018. KAGRA's first observation run is scheduled in late 2019, aiming to join the third observation run (O3) of the advanced LIGO/Virgo network. In this work, we describe a brief history of KAGRA and highlights of main feature. We also discuss the prospects of GW observation with KAGRA in the era of O3. When operating along with the existing GW detectors, KAGRA will be helpful to locate a GW source more accurately and to determine the source parameters with higher precision, providing information for follow-up observations of a GW trigger candidate.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1712.00148  [pdf] - 2127370
Construction of KAGRA: an Underground Gravitational Wave Observatory
Akutsu, T.; Ando, M.; Araki, S.; Araya, A.; Arima, T.; Aritomi, N.; Asada, H.; Aso, Y.; Atsuta, S.; Awai, K.; Baiotti, L.; Barton, M. A.; Chen, D.; Cho, K.; Craig, K.; DeSalvo, R.; Doi, K.; Eda, K.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujibayashi, S.; Fujii, Y.; Fujimoto, M. -K.; Fukushima, M.; Furuhata, T.; Hagiwara, A.; Haino, S.; Harita, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Hasegawa, M.; Hashino, K.; Hayama, K.; Hirata, N.; Hirose, E.; Ikenoue, B.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Ishizaki, H.; Itoh, Y.; Jia, D.; Kagawa, T.; Kaji, T.; Kajita, T.; Kakizaki, M.; Kakuhata, H.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanbara, S.; Kanda, N.; Kanemura, S.; Kaneyama, M.; Kasuya, J.; Kataoka, Y.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawai, N.; Kawamura, S.; Kawazoe, F.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, W.; Kimura, N.; Kitaoka, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kotake, K.; Kubo, K.; Kumar, R.; Kume, T.; Kuroda, K.; Kuwahara, Y.; Lee, H. -K.; Lee, H. -W.; Lin, C. -Y.; Liu, Y.; Majorana, E.; Mano, S.; Marchio, M.; Matsui, T.; Matsumoto, N.; Matsushima, F.; Michimura, Y.; Mio, N.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyake, K.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyamoto, T.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Morii, W.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Muraki, Y.; Murakoshi, M.; Musha, M.; Nagano, K.; Nagano, S.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakano, M.; Nakao, H.; Nakao, K.; Narikawa, T.; Ni, W. -T.; Nonomura, T.; Obuchi, Y.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, S. -H.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Ohmae, N.; Okino, K.; Okutomi, K.; Ono, K.; Ono, Y.; Oohara, K.; Ota, S.; Park, J.; Arellano, F. E. Peña; Pinto, I. M.; Principe, M.; Sago, N.; Saijo, M.; Saito, T.; Saito, Y.; Saitou, S.; Sakai, K.; Sakakibara, Y.; Sasaki, Y.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sato, Y.; Sekiguchi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Shibata, M.; Shiga, K.; Shikano, Y.; Shimoda, T.; Shinkai, H.; Shoda, A.; Someya, N.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Starecki, T.; Suemasa, A.; Sugimoto, Y.; Susa, Y.; Suwabe, H.; Suzuki, T.; Tachibana, Y.; Tagoshi, H.; Takada, S.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takeda, H.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tatsumi, D.; Telada, S.; Tomaru, T.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Tsukada, L.; Tsuzuki, T.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Uehara, T.; Ueki, S.; Ueno, K.; Uraguchi, F.; Ushiba, T.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; Wada, S.; Wakamatsu, T.; Yaginuma, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Yano, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoon, T. H.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, L.; Agatsuma, K.; Akiyama, Y.; Arai, N.; Asano, M.; Bertolini, A.; Fujisawa, M.; Goetz, R.; Guscott, J.; Hashimoto, Y.; Hayashida, Y.; Hennes, E.; Hirai, K.; Hirayama, T.; Ishitsuka, H.; Kato, J.; Khalaidovski, A.; Koike, S.; Kumeta, A.; Miener, T.; Morioka, M.; Mueller, C. L.; Narita, T.; Oda, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Sekiguchi, T.; Tamura, H.; Tanner, D. B.; Tokoku, C.; Toritani, M.; Utsuki, T.; Uyeshima, M.; Brand, J. van den; van Heijningen, J.; Yamaguchi, S.; Yanagida, A.
Comments: Resolution of some figures has been decreased from its original version submitted to a journal
Submitted: 2017-11-30, last modified: 2017-12-11
Major construction and initial-phase operation of a second-generation gravitational-wave detector KAGRA has been completed. The entire 3-km detector is installed underground in a mine in order to be isolated from background seismic vibrations on the surface. This allows us to achieve a good sensitivity at low frequencies and high stability of the detector. Bare-bones equipment for the interferometer operation has been installed and the first test run was accomplished in March and April of 2016 with a rather simple configuration. The initial configuration of KAGRA is named {\it iKAGRA}. In this paper, we summarize the construction of KAGRA, including the study of the advantages and challenges of building an underground detector and the operation of the iKAGRA interferometer together with the geophysics interferometer that has been constructed in the same tunnel.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.09127  [pdf] - 2121976
Numerical simulation of time delay interferometry for new LISA, TAIJI and other LISA-like missions
Comments: The supplement is added in this version. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1204.2125
Submitted: 2017-07-28, last modified: 2017-12-09
The success of LISA Pathfinder in demonstrating the LISA drag-free requirement paved the road of using space missions for detecting low-frequency and middle-frequency GWs. The new LISA GW mission proposes to use arm length of 2.5 Gm (1 Gm = 106 km). The TAIJI GW mission proposes to use arm length of 3 Gm. In order to attain the requisite sensitivity, laser frequency noise must be suppressed to below the secondary noises such as the optical path noise, acceleration noise etc. In previous papers, we have performed the numerical simulation of the time delay interferometry (TDI) for original LISA, ASTROD-GW and eLISA together with a LISA-type mission with a nominal arm length of 2 Gm using the CGC 2.7/CGC2.7.1 ephemeris framework. In this paper, we follow the same procedure to simulate the time delay interferometry numerically for the new LISA mission and the TAIJI mission together with LISA-like missions of arm length 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 Gm. The resulting optical path differences of the second-generation TDI calculated for new LISA, TAIJI, and LISA-like missions or arm length 1, 2, 4, 5 & 6 Gm are well below their respective limits which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed. However, for of the first generation X, Y, and Z TDI configurations, the original requirements need to be relaxed by 3 to 30 fold to be satisfied. For the new LISA and TAIJI, about one order of magnitude relaxation would be good and recommended; this could be borne on the laser stability requirement in view of recent progress in laser stability. Compared with X, Y and Z, the X+Y+Z configuration does have a good cancellation of path length differences and could serve as a null string detection check. We compile and compare the resulting differences of various TDI configurations due to the different arm lengths for various LISA-like mission proposals and for the ASTROD-GW mission proposal.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1710.04823  [pdf] - 2104587
The status of KAGRA underground cryogenic gravitational wave telescope
KAGRA Collaboration; Akutsu, T.; Ando, M.; Araya, A.; Aritomi, N.; Asada, H.; Aso, Y.; Atsuta, S.; Awai, K.; Barton, M. A.; Cannon, K.; Craig, K.; Creus, W.; Doi, K.; Eda, K.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujii, Y.; Fujimoto, M. -K.; Furuhata, T.; Haino, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Hashino, K.; Hayama, K.; Hirobayashi, S.; Hirose, E.; Hsieh, B. H.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Itoh, Y.; Kaji, T.; Kajita, T.; Kakizaki, M.; Kamiizumi, M.; Kambara, S.; Kanda, N.; Kanemura, S.; Kaneyama, M.; Kang, G.; Kasuya, J.; Kataoka, Y.; Kawai, N.; Kawamura, S.; Kim, C.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Kimura, N.; Kinugawa, T.; Kirii, S.; Kitaoka, Y.; Kojima, Y.; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kotake, K.; Kumar, R.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.; Liu, Y.; Luca, N.; Majorana, E.; Mano, S.; Marchio, M.; Matsui, T.; Matsushima, F.; Michimura, Y.; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, T.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Morii, W.; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Morozumi, T.; Musha, M.; Nagano, S.; Nagano, K.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nakano, H.; Nakano, M.; Nakao, K.; Narikawa, T.; Quynh, L. Nguyen; Ni, W. -T.; Ochi, T.; Oh, J.; Oh, S.; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, M.; Okutomi, K.; Oohara, K.; Alleano, F. E. Peña; Pinto, I.; Sago, N.; Saijo, M.; Saito, Y.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, Y.; Sasaki, Y.; Sasaki, M.; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Seto, N.; Shibata, M.; Shimoda, T.; Shinkai, H.; Shoda, A.; Somiya, K.; Son, E.; Suemasa, A.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tagoshi, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Takamori, A.; Takeda, H.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tatsumi, D.; Tomaru, T.; Tomura, T.; Travasso, F.; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, T.; Uehara, T.; Ueki, S.; Ueno, K.; Ushiba, T.; van Putten, M. H. P. M.; Vocca, H.; Wada, S.; Wakamatsu, T.; Yamada, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, A.; Yokoyama, J.; Yokozawa, T.; Yoon, T. H.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhu, Z. -H.
Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures. Proceedings for XV International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP2017), Sudbury, July 24-28, 2017
Submitted: 2017-10-13
KAGRA is a 3-km interferometric gravitational wave telescope located in the Kamioka mine in Japan. It is the first km-class gravitational wave telescope constructed underground to reduce seismic noise, and the first km-class telescope to use cryogenic cooling of test masses to reduce thermal noise. The construction of the infrastructure to house the interferometer in the tunnel, and the initial phase operation of the interferometer with a simple 3-km Michelson configuration have been completed. The first cryogenic operation is expected in 2018, and the observing runs with a full interferometer are expected in 2020s. The basic interferometer configuration and the current status of KAGRA are described.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.05659  [pdf] - 1622274
Gravitational Wave (GW) Classification, Space GW Detection Sensitivities and AMIGO (Astrodynamical Middle-frequency Interferometric GW Observatory)
Comments: 10 pages, 2 figures, 1 table, Plenary talk given in Joint Meeting of 13th International Conference on Gravitation, Astrophysics, and Cosmology and 15th Italian-Korean Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea, July 3-7, 2017
Submitted: 2017-09-17
After first reviewing the gravitational wave (GW) spectral classification. we discuss the sensitivities of GW detection in space aimed at low frequency band (100 nHz-100 mHz) and middle frequency band (100 mHz-10 Hz). The science goals are to detect GWs from (i) Supermassive Black Holes; (ii) Extreme-Mass-Ratio Black Hole Inspirals; (iii) Intermediate-Mass Black Holes; (iv) Galactic Compact Binaries; (v) Stellar-Size Black Hole Binaries; and (vi) Relic GW Background. The detector proposals have arm length ranging from 100 km to 1.35x109 km (9 AU) including (a) Solar orbiting detectors and (b) Earth orbiting detectors. We discuss especially the sensitivities in the frequency band 0.1-10 microHz and the middle frequency band (0.1 Hz-10 Hz). We propose and discuss AMIGO as an Astrodynamical Middle-frequency Interferometric GW Observatory.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.06025  [pdf] - 1532701
Solar-system tests of the relativistic gravity
Comments: 30 pages, 3 tables, Chapter 8 in One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foundations to Gravitational Waves, Cosmology and Quantum Gravity, ed. W.-T. Ni (World Scientific, Singapore, 2016); matches the published version of IJMPD. This article is an 11-year update of the solar-system tests part of arXiv:gr-qc/0504116 on Empirical Foundations of Relativistic Gravity
Submitted: 2016-11-18, last modified: 2016-12-25
In 1859, Le Verrier discovered the Mercury perihelion advance anomaly. This anomaly turned out to be the first relativistic-gravity effect observed. During the 157 years to 2016, the precisions and accuracies of laboratory and space experiments, and of astrophysical and cosmological observations on relativistic gravity have been improved by 3-4 orders of magnitude. The improvements have been mainly from optical observations at first followed by radio observations. The achievements for the past 50 years are from radio Doppler tracking and radio ranging together with lunar laser ranging. At the present, the radio observations and lunar laser ranging experiments are similar in the accuracy of testing relativistic gravity. We review and summarize the present status of solar-system tests of relativistic gravity. With planetary laser ranging, spacecraft laser ranging and interferometric laser ranging (laser Doppler ranging) together with the development of drag-free technology, the optical observations will improve the accuracies by another 3-4 orders of magnitude in both the equivalence principle tests and solar-system dynamics tests of relativistic gravity. Clock tests and atomic interferometry tests of relativistic gravity will reach an ever-increasing precision. These will give crucial clues in both experimental and theoretical aspects of gravity, and may lead to answers to some profound issues in gravity and cosmology.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.00919  [pdf] - 1527194
Foreword with a table of contents for Special IJMPD Issue on Spacetime Structure and Electrodynamics
Comments: 5 pages with links to arXiv
Submitted: 2016-11-03
In the last two decades we have seen important mutual stimulations between the community working on electrodynamics of continuous media and the community working on spacetime structure. This is highlighted by the publication of two important monographs from two communities: Foundations of Classical Electrodynamics by F. W. Hehl and Yu. N. Obukhov (Birkh\"auser, Boston 2003) and Differential Forms in Electromagnetics by I. V. Lindell (IEEE Press-Wiley, Piscataway, NJ 2004; see also a new book "Multiforms, Dyadics, and Electromagnetic Media" by the same author in 2015). Starting around 1960, magnetoelectric effects and magnetoelectric media have been a focus of study. Somewhat later, the constitutive tensor density framework was used to construct spacetime structure theoretically and empirically. Earlier, in putting Maxwell equations into a form compatible with general relativity, Einstein noticed that the Maxwell equations can be formulated in a form independent of the metric gravitational potential in 1916; only the constitutive tensor density depends on the metric. This was followed by further stimulating and clarifying works of Weyl in 1918, Murnaghan in 1921, Kottler in 1922 and Cartan in 1923. Year 2016 is the centennial of the start of this historical development. International Journal of Modern Physics D of World Scientific is celebrating the occasion by publishing this special issue on Spacetime Structure and Electrodynamics. We have invited researchers to submit original research articles that would contribute to a better understanding of the phenomena inherent to spacetime structure and electrodynamic media.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.03565  [pdf] - 1527139
Precision requirements and innovative manufacturing for ultrahigh precision laser interferometry of gravitational-wave astronomy
Comments: 12 pages, 3 tables, invited talk for Photonics Asia 2016, October 12-14, Beijing. To be published in Proceedings of SPIE
Submitted: 2016-10-11
With the LIGO announcement of the first direct detection of gravitational waves (GWs), the GW Astronomy was formally ushered into our age. After one-hundred years of theoretical investigation and fifty years of experimental endeavor, this is a historical landmark not just for physics and astronomy, but also for industry and manufacturing. The challenge and opportunity for industry is precision and innovative manufacturing in large size - production of large and homogeneous optical components, optical diagnosis of large components, high reflectance dielectric coating on large mirrors, manufacturing of components for ultrahigh vacuum of large volume, manufacturing of high attenuating vibration isolation system, production of high-power high-stability single-frequency lasers, production of high-resolution positioning systems etc. In this talk, we address the requirements and methods to satisfy these requirements. Optical diagnosis of large optical components requires large phase-shifting interferometer; the 1.06 {\mu}m Phase Shifting Interferometer for testing LIGO optics is an example. High quality mirrors are crucial for laser interferometric GW detection, so as for ring laser gyroscope, high precision laser stabilization via optical cavities, quantum optomechanics, cavity quantum electrodynamics and vacuum birefringence measurement. There are stringent requirements on the substrate materials and coating methods. For cryogenic GW interferometer, appropriate coating on sapphire or silicon are required for good thermal and homogeneity properties. Large ultrahigh vacuum components and high attenuating vibration system together with an efficient metrology system are required and will be addressed. For space interferometry, drag-free technology is well-developed; weak-light phase locking is demonstrated in the laboratories while weak-light manipulation technology still needs developments.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.01148  [pdf] - 1527104
Gravitational wave detection in space
Comments: 48 pages, 10 figures, Chapter 12 in One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foundations to Gravitational Waves, Cosmology and Quantum Gravity, ed.W.-T. Ni (World Scientific, Singapore, 2016); Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, to be published. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1212.2816
Submitted: 2016-10-04
Gravitational wave (GW) detection in space is aimed at low frequency band (100 nHz - 100 mHz) and middle frequency band (100 mHz - 10 Hz). The science goals are the detection of GWs from (i) Supermassive Black Holes; (ii) Extreme-Mass-Ratio Black Hole Inspirals; (iii) Intermediate-Mass Black Holes; (iv) Galactic Compact Binaries and (v) Relic GW Background. In this paper, we present an overview on the sensitivity, orbit design, basic orbit configuration, angular resolution, orbit optimization, deployment, time-delay interferometry and payload concept of the current proposed GW detectors in space under study. The detector proposals under study have arm length ranging from 1000 km to 1.3 x 109 km (8.6 AU) including (a) Solar orbiting detectors -- ASTROD-GW (ASTROD [Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices] optimized for GW detection), BBO (Big Bang Observer), DECIGO (DECi-hertz Interferometer GW Observatory), e-LISA (evolved LISA [Laser Interferometer Space Antenna]), LISA, other LISA-type detectors such as ALIA, TAIJI etc. (in Earth-like solar orbits), and Super-ASTROD (in Jupiter-like solar orbits); and (b) Earth orbiting detectors -- ASTROD-EM/LAGRANGE, GADFLI/GEOGRAWI/g-LISA, OMEGA and TIANQIN.
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:1412.8569  [pdf] - 1420038
New constraints on cosmic polarization rotation from the ACTPol cosmic microwave background B-Mode polarization observation and the BICEP2 constraint update
Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables, version to match the accepted submission to ApJ. Unfortunately there is a sign error in equation (6b). This propagated to equations (7b) and (8a) and to the results for \alpha_\beta. The errors in the last raw of Table 1 had been overestimated and corrected
Submitted: 2014-12-30, last modified: 2016-06-08
Recently ACTPol has measured the cosmic microwave background (CMB) B-mode and E-mode polarizations and obtained TE, EE, BB, TB and EB power spectra in the multipole range 225-8725. In our previous paper (Ap. J. 792 (2014) 35 [Paper I]), we have analyzed jointly the results of three experiments on the CMB B-mode polarization -- SPTpol, POLARBEAR and BICEP2 to include in the model, in addition to the gravitational lensing and the inflationary gravitational waves components, also the fluctuation effects induced by the cosmic polarization rotation (CPR), if it exists within the upper limits at the time. In this paper, we fit both the mean CPR angle <{\alpha}> and its fluctuation <{\delta}{\alpha}2> from the new ACTPol data, and update our fitting of CPR fluctuations using BICEP2 data taking the new Planck dust measurement results into consideration. We follow the method of Paper I. The mean CPR angle is constrained from the EB correlation power spectra to |<{\alpha}>| < 14 mrad (0.8{\deg}) and the fluctuation (rms) is constrained from the BB correlation power spectra to <{\delta}{\alpha}2>1/2 < 29.3 mrad (1.68{\deg}). Assuming that the polarization angle of Tau A does not change from 89.2 to 146 GHz, the ACTPol data give <{\alpha}> = 1.0 {\pm} 0.63{\deg}. These results suggest that the inclusion of the present ACTPol data is consistent with no CPR detection. With the new Planck dust measurement, we update our fits of the BICEP2 CPR fluctuation constraint to be 32.8 mrad (1.88{\deg}). The joint ACTpol-BICEP2-POLARBEAR CPR fluctuation constraint is 23.7 mrad (1.36{\deg}).
[19]  oai:arXiv.org:1603.08193  [pdf] - 1838102
New Constraints On Cosmic Polarization Rotation Including SPTpol B-mode Polarization Observations
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, to be published in Proceedings of the Second LeCosPA Symposium "Everything about Gravity" on December 14-18, 2015 in Taipei
Submitted: 2016-03-27
We present an update of the cosmic polarization rotation (CPR) constraint from the recent SPTpol measurements of sub-degree B-mode polarization in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) of 100 square degrees of sky. Our previous CPR fluctuation constraint from the joint ACTpol-BICEP2-POLARBEAR polarization data is 23.7 mrad (1.36{\deg}). With new SPTpol data included, the CPR fluctuation constraint is updated to 17 mrad (1{\deg}) with the scalar to tensor ratio r = - 0.05 +- 0.1
[20]  oai:arXiv.org:1602.02872  [pdf] - 1359306
Gravitational wave astronomy: the current status
Comments: published (2015)
Submitted: 2016-02-09
In the centenary year of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, this paper reviews the current status of gravitational wave astronomy across a spectrum which stretches from attohertz to kilohertz frequencies. Sect. 1 of this paper reviews the historical development of gravitational wave astronomy from Einstein's first prediction to our current understanding the spectrum. It is shown that detection of signals in the audio frequency spectrum can be expected very soon, and that a north-south pair of next generation detectors would provide large scientific benefits. Sect. 2 reviews the theory of gravitational waves and the principles of detection using laser interferometry. The state of the art Advanced LIGO detectors are then described. These detectors have a high chance of detecting the first events in the near future. Sect. 3 reviews the KAGRA detector currently under development in Japan, which will be the first laser interferometer detector to use cryogenic test masses. Sect. 4 of this paper reviews gravitational wave detection in the nanohertz frequency band using the technique of pulsar timing. Sect. 5 reviews the status of gravitational wave detection in the attohertz frequency band, detectable in the polarisation of the cosmic microwave background, and discusses the prospects for detection of primordial waves from the big bang. The techniques described in sects. 1-5 have already placed significant limits on the strength of gravitational wave sources. Sects. 6 and 7 review ambitious plans for future space based gravitational wave detectors in the millihertz frequency band. Sect. 6 presents a roadmap for development of space based gravitational wave detectors by China while sect. 7 discusses a key enabling technology for space interferometry known as time delay interferometry.
[21]  oai:arXiv.org:1511.00231  [pdf] - 1351549
Gravitational waves: Classification, Methods of detection, Sensitivities, and Sources
Comments: 38 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables. Chapter 10 in One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foundations to Gravitational Waves, Cosmology and Quantum Gravity, ed.W.-T. Ni (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015); Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, to be published
Submitted: 2015-11-01
After giving a brief introduction and presenting a complete classification of gravitational waves (GWs) according to their frequencies, we review and summarize the detection methods, the sensitivities, and the sources. We notice that real-time detections are possible above 300 pHz. Below 300 pHz, the detections are possible on GW imprints or indirectly. We are on the verge of detection. The progress in this field will be promising and thriving. We will see improvement of a few orders to several orders of magnitude in the GW detection sensitivities over all frequency bands in the next hundred years.
[22]  oai:arXiv.org:1509.04497  [pdf] - 1351489
General relativity and cosmology
Comments: 15 pages PDF, 4 figures, to appear as introductory chapter in "One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foundations to Gravitational Waves, Cosmology and Quantum Gravity"
Submitted: 2015-09-15
This year marks the hundredth anniversary of Einstein's 1915 landmark paper "Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation" in which the field equations of general relativity were correctly formulated for the first time, thus rendering general relativity a complete theory. Over the subsequent hundred years physicists and astronomers have struggled with uncovering the consequences and applications of these equations. This contribution, which was written as an introduction to six chapters dealing with the connection between general relativity and cosmology that will appear in the two-volume book "One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foundations to Gravitational Waves, Cosmology and Quantum Gravity," endeavors to provide a historical overview of the connection between general relativity and cosmology, two areas whose development has been closely intertwined.
[23]  oai:arXiv.org:1501.07696  [pdf] - 1374049
Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity: a five-year update
Comments: 12 pages, 2 tables; Plenary talk presented in the 21st International Symposium on Spin Physics (Spin2014), 19 October 2014 - 24 October 2014, Peking University, Beijing, China; Based partly on arXiv:1411.0460, arXiv:1410.0126 and arXiv:0912.5057
Submitted: 2015-01-30
Searches for the role of spin in gravitation dated before the firm establishment of the electron spin in 1925. Since mass and spin, or helicity in the case of zero mass, are the Casimir invariants of the Poincar\'e group and mass participates in universal gravitation, these searches are natural steps to pursue. In this update, we report on the progress on this topic in the last five years after our last review. We begin with how is Lorentz/Poincar\'e group in local physics arisen from spacetime structure as seen by photon and matter through experiments/observations. The cosmic verification of the Galileo Equivalence Principle for photons/electromagnetic wave packets (Universality of Propagation in spacetime independent of photon energy and polarization, i.e. nonbirefringence) constrains the spacetime constitutive tensor to high precision to a core metric form with an axion degree and a dilaton degree of freedom. Hughes-Drever-type experiments then constrain this core metric to agree with the matter metric. Thus comes the metric with axion and dilation. In local physics this metric gives the Lorentz/Poincar\'e covariance. Constraints on axion and dilaton from polarized/unpolarized laboratory/astrophysical/cosmic experiments/observations are presented. In the end, we review the theoretical progress on the issue of gyrogravitational ratio for fundamental particles and the experimental progress on the measurements of possible long range/intermediate range spin-spin, spin-monopole and spin-cosmos interactions.
[24]  oai:arXiv.org:1410.0126  [pdf] - 891451
Dilaton field and cosmic wave propagation
Comments: 16 pages, Physics Letters A in press
Submitted: 2014-10-01
We study the electromagnetic wave propagation in the joint dilaton field and axion field. Dilaton field induces amplification/attenuation in the propagation while axion field induces polarization rotation. The amplification/attenuation induced by dilaton is independent of the frequency (energy) and the polarization of electromagnetic waves (photons). From observations, the agreement with and the precise calibration of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) to blackbody radiation constrains the fractional change of dilaton |{\Delta}{\psi}|/{\psi} to less than about 8 x 10^(-4) since the time of the last scattering surface of the CMB.
[25]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.4162  [pdf] - 1278762
Orbit optimization and time delay interferometry for inclined ASTROD-GW formation with half-year precession-period
Comments: 25 pages, 7 figures and 5 tables. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1205.5175
Submitted: 2014-09-15
ASTROD-GW (ASTROD [Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices] optimized for Gravitational Wave detection) is a gravitational-wave mission with the aim of detecting gravitational waves from massive black holes, extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRIs) and galactic compact binaries, together with testing relativistic gravity and probing dark energy and cosmology. Mission orbits of the 3 spacecrafts forming a nearly equilateral triangular array are chosen to be near the Sun-Earth Lagrange points L3, L4 and L5. The 3 spacecrafts range interferometrically with one another with arm length about 260 million kilometers. For 260 times longer arm length, the detection sensitivity of ASTROD-GW is 260 fold better than that of eLISA/NGO in the lower frequency region by assuming the same acceleration noise. Therefore, ASTROD-GW will be a better cosmological probe. In previous papers, we have worked out the time delay interferometry (TDI) for the ecliptic formation. To resolve the reflection ambiguity about the ecliptic plane in source position determination, we have changed the basic formation into slightly inclined formation with half-year precession-period. In this paper, we optimize a set of 10-year inclined ASTROD-GW mission orbits numerically using ephemeris framework starting at June 21, 2035, including cases of inclination angle is 0{\deg} (no inclination), 0.5{\deg}, 1.0{\deg}, 1.5{\deg}, 2.0{\deg}, 2.5{\deg} and 3.0{\deg}. We simulate the time delays of the first and second generation TDI configurations for the different inclinations, and compare/analyse the numerical results to attain the requisite sensitivity of ASTROD-GW by suppressing laser frequency noise below the secondary noises. To explicate our calculation process for different inclination cases, we take the 1.0{\deg} as example to show the orbit optimization and TDI simulation.
[26]  oai:arXiv.org:1404.1701  [pdf] - 862642
New Constraints on Cosmic Polarization Rotation from B-Mode Polarization in Cosmic Microwave Background
Comments: Accepted for publication by The Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2014-04-07, last modified: 2014-07-08
STPpol, POLARBEAR and BICEP2 have recently measured the cosmic microwave background (CMB) B-mode polarization in various sky regions of several tens of square degrees and obtained BB power spectra in the multipole range 20-3000, detecting the components due to gravitational lensing and to inflationary gravitational waves. We analyze jointly the results of these three experiments and propose modifications of their analysis of the spectra to include in the model, in addition to the gravitational lensing and the inflationary gravitational waves components, also the effects induced by the cosmic polarization rotation (CPR), if it exists within current upper limits. Although in principle our analysis would lead also to new constraints on CPR, in practice these can only be given on its fluctuations <{\delta}{\alpha}^2>, since constraints on its mean angle are inhibited by the de-rotation which is applied by current CMB polarization experiments, in order to cope with the insufficient calibration of the polarization angle. The combined data fits from all three experiments (with 29% CPR-SPTpol correlation, depending on theoretical model) gives constraint <{\delta}{\alpha}^2>^1/2 < 27.3 mrad (1.56{\deg}) with r = 0.194 \pm 0.033. These results show that the present data are consistent with no CPR detection and the constraint on CPR fluctuation is about 1.5{\deg}. This method of constraining the cosmic polarization rotation is new, is complementary to previous tests, which use the radio and optical/UV polarization of radio galaxies and the CMB E-mode polarization, and adds a new constraint for the sky areas observed by SPTpol, POLARBEAR and BICEP2.
[27]  oai:arXiv.org:1403.6711  [pdf] - 1208604
Anomalous character of the axion-photon coupling in a magnetic field distorted by a pp-wave gravitational background
Comments: 26 pages, no figures
Submitted: 2014-03-26
We study the problem of axion-photon coupling in the magnetic field influenced by gravitational radiation. We focus on exact solutions to the equations for axion electrodynamics in the pp-wave gravitational background for two models with initially constant magnetic field. The first model describes the response of an initially constant magnetic field in a gravitational-wave vacuum with unit refraction index; the second model is characterized by a non-unit refraction index prescribed to the presence of ordinary and/or dark matter. We show that both models demonstrate anomalous behavior of the electromagnetic field generated by the axion-photon coupling in the presence of magnetic field, evolving in the gravitational wave background. The role of axionic dark matter in the formation of the anomalous response of this electrodynamic system is discussed.
[28]  oai:arXiv.org:1312.3056  [pdf] - 804492
Skewon field and cosmic wave propagation
Comments: 16 pages, additional references added and section 4.2 shortened to match the PLA accepted version
Submitted: 2013-12-11, last modified: 2014-02-28
For the study of the gravitational coupling of electromagnetism and the equivalence principle, we have used the spacetime constitutive tensor density {chi}ijkl, and discovered the nonmetric (axion) part (A){chi}ijkl (equal to {phi}eijkl) of {chi}ijkl worthy investigation. Since we have used Lagrangian formalism, {chi}ijkl is effectively symmetric under the interchange of index pairs, ij and kl, and has 21 independent degrees of freedom. Hehl, Obukhov and Rubilar have started from charge-flux formalism to study electromagnetism, discovered the antisymmetric part (Sk){chi}ijkl (15 degrees of freedom) of {chi}ijkl under the interchange of index pairs ij and kl worthy investigation, and called it skewon field. In this paper, we study the propagation of the Hehl-Obukhov-Rubilar skewon field in weak gravity field/dilute matter or with weak violation of the Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP), and further classify it into Type I and Type II skewons. From the dispersion relation we show that no dissipation/no amplification condition implies that the additional skewon field must be of Type II. For Type I skewon field, the dissipation/amplification is proportional to the frequency and the CMB spectrum would deviate from Planck spectrum. From the high precision agreement of the CMB spectrum to 2.755 K Planck spectrum, we constrain the Type I cosmic skewon field (SkI){chi}ijkl to less than a few x 10-35. The skewon part of constitutive tensor constructed from asymmetric metric is of Type II, hence is allowed. This study may also find applications in macroscopic electrodynamics in the case of laser pumped medium or dissipative medium.
[29]  oai:arXiv.org:1204.2125  [pdf] - 1369210
Numerical simulation of time delay interferometry for eLISA/NGO
Comments: 17 pages, 13 figures, 3 tables, minor changes in description to match the accepted version of Classical and Quantum Gravity. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1102.4965
Submitted: 2012-04-10, last modified: 2013-01-29
eLISA/NGO is a new gravitational wave detection proposal with arm length of 10^6 km and one interferometer down-scaled from LISA. Just like LISA and ASTROD-GW, in order to attain the requisite sensitivity for eLISA/NGO, laser frequency noise must be suppressed to below the secondary noises such as the optical path noise, acceleration noise etc. In previous papers, we have performed the numerical simulation of the time delay interferometry (TDI) for LISA and ASTROD-GW with one arm dysfunctional by using the CGC 2.7 ephemeris. The results are well below their respective limits which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed. In this paper, we follow the same procedure to simulate the time delay interferometry numerically. To do this, we work out a set of 1000-day optimized mission orbits of the eLISA/NGO spacecraft starting at January 1st, 2021 using the CGC 2.7 ephemeris framework. We then use the numerical method to calculate the residual optical path differences in the second-generation TDI solutions as in our previous papers. The maximum path length difference, for all configurations calculated, is below 13 mm (43 ps). It is well below the limit which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed for eLISA/NGO. We compare and discuss the resulting differences due to the different arm lengths for various mission proposals -- eLISA/NGO, an NGO-LISA-type mission with a nominal arm length of 2 x 10^6 km, LISA and ASTROD-GW.
[30]  oai:arXiv.org:1212.1253  [pdf] - 621434
Deployment and simulation of the ASTROD-GW formation
Comments: 15 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables, to be published in IJMPD vol. 22,1341005 (2013); this version to match the printed version
Submitted: 2012-12-06, last modified: 2013-01-18
Constellation or formation flying is a common concept in space Gravitational Wave (GW) mission proposals for the required interferometry implementation. The spacecraft of most of these mission proposals go to deep space and many have Earthlike orbits around the Sun. ASTROD-GW, Big Bang Observer and DECIGO have spacecraft distributed in Earthlike orbits in formation. The deployment of orbit formation is an important issue for these missions. ASTROD-GW (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices optimized for Gravitation Wave detection) is to focus on the goal of detection of GWs. The mission orbits of the 3 spacecraft forming a nearly equilateral triangular array are chosen to be near the Sun-Earth Lagrange points L3, L4 and L5. The 3 spacecraft range interferometrically with one another with arm length about 260 million kilometers with the scientific goals including detection of GWs from Massive Black Holes (MBH), and Extreme-Mass-Ratio Black Hole Inspirals (EMRI), and using these observations to find the evolution of the equation of state of dark energy and to explore the co-evolution of massive black holes with galaxies. In this paper, we review the formation flying for fundamental physics missions, design the preliminary transfer orbits of the ASTROD-GW spacecraft from the separations of the launch vehicles to the mission orbits, and simulate the arm lengths of the triangular formation. From our study, the optimal delta-Vs and propellant ratios of the transfer orbits could be within about 2.5 km/s and 0.55, respectively. From the simulation of the formation for 10 years, the arm lengths of the formation vary in the range 1.73210 +- 0.00015 AU with the arm length differences varying in the range +- 0.00025 AU for formation with 1 degree inclination to the ecliptic plane. This meets the measurement requirements.
[31]  oai:arXiv.org:1212.2816  [pdf] - 621437
ASTROD-GW: Overview and Progress
Comments: 32 pages,9 figures, 2 tables,to be published in IJMPD vol. 22,1341004 (2013); in this version, references are added and typos corrected
Submitted: 2012-12-12, last modified: 2012-12-16
In this paper, we present an overview of ASTROD-GW (ASTROD [Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices] optimized for Gravitational Wave [GW] detection) mission concept and its studies. ASTROD-GW is an optimization of ASTROD which focuses on low frequency gravitational wave detection. The detection sensitivity is shifted by a factor of 260 (52) towards longer wavelengths compared with that of NGO/eLISA (LISA). The mission consists of three spacecraft, each of which orbits near one of the Sun-Earth Lagrange points (L3, L4 and L5), such that the array forms an almost equilateral triangle. The 3 spacecraft range interferometrically with one another with an arm length of about 260 million kilometers. The orbits have been optimized resulting in arm length changes of less than 0.00015 AU or, fractionally, less than 10^(-4) in twenty years, and relative Doppler velocities of the three spacecraft of less than 3 m/s. In this paper, we present an overview of the mission covering: the scientific aims, the sensitivity spectrum, the basic orbit configuration, the simulation and optimization of the spacecraft orbits, the deployment of ASTROD-GW formation, TDI (Time Delay Interferometry) and the payload. The science goals are the detection of GWs from (i) Supermassive Black Holes; (ii) Extreme-Mass-Ratio Black Hole Inspirals; (iii) Intermediate-Mass Black Holes; (iv) Galactic Compact Binaries and (v) Relic Gravitational Wave Background. For the purposes of primordial GW detection, a six spacecraft formation would be needed to enable the correlated detection of stochastic GWs. A brief discussion of the six spacecraft orbit optimization is also presented.
[32]  oai:arXiv.org:1212.3645  [pdf] - 611335
Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices I (ASTROD I) - Mission Overview
Comments: 10 pages,5 figures, 1 tables,to be published in IJMPD Vol. 22,1341003 (2013)
Submitted: 2012-12-14
ASTROD I is the first planned space mission in a series of ASTROD missions for testing relativity in space using optical devices. The main aims are: (i) to test General Relativity with an improvement of three orders of magnitude compared to current results, (ii) to measure solar and solar system parameters with improved accuracy, (iii) to test the constancy of the gravitational constant and in general to get a deeper understanding of gravity. The first ideas for the ASTROD missions go back to the last century when new technologies in the area of laser physics and time measurement began to appear on the horizon. ASTROD is a mission concept that is supported by a broad international community covering the areas of space technology, fundamental physics, high performance laser and clock technology and drag free control. While ASTROD I is a single-spacecraft concept that performes measurements with pulsed laser ranging between the spacecraft and earthbound laser ranging stations, ASTROD-GW is planned to be a three spacecraft mission with inter-spacecraft laser ranging. ASTROD-GW would be able to detect gravitational waves at frequencies below the eLISA/NGO bandwidth. As a third step Super-ASTROD with larger orbits could even probe primordial gravitational waves. This article gives an overview on the basic principles especially for ASTROD I.
[33]  oai:arXiv.org:1210.7388  [pdf] - 582600
Fifth ASTROD Symposium and Outlook of Direct Gravitational-Wave Detection
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2012-10-27
From July 11 to July 13, 2012, Raman Research Institute (Bangalore, India) hosted the Fifth International ASTROD Symposium on Laser Astrodynamics, Space Test of Relativity and Gravitational-Wave Astronomy. This is a report on the symposium with an exposition of the outlook of direct gravitational-wave detection.
[34]  oai:arXiv.org:1102.4965  [pdf] - 580927
Numerical simulation of time delay interferometry for a LISA-like mission with the simplification of having only one interferometer
Comments: 16 pages, 5 figures, version to appear in Advances in Space Research reflecting the change from LISA to eLISA
Submitted: 2011-02-24, last modified: 2012-09-20
In order to attain the requisite sensitivity for LISA, laser frequency noise must be suppressed below the secondary noises such as the optical path noise, acceleration noise etc. In a previous paper (Dhurandhar et al., Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 135013, 2010), we have found a large family of second-generation analytic solutions of time delay interferometry with one arm dysfunctional, and we also estimated the laser noise due to residual time-delay semi-analytically from orbit perturbations due to Earth. Since other planets and solar-system bodies also perturb the orbits of LISA spacecraft and affect the time delay interferometry (TDI), we simulate the time delay numerically in this paper for all solutions with the generation number n \leq 3. We have worked out a set of 3-year optimized mission orbits of LISA spacecraft starting at January 1, 2021 using the CGC2.7 ephemeris framework. We then use this numerical solution to calculate the residual optical path differences in the second-generation solutions of our previous paper, and compare with the semi-analytic error estimate. The accuracy of this calculation is better than 1 cm (or 30 ps). The maximum path length difference, for all configuration calculated, is below 1 m (3 ns). This is well below the limit under which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed. The numerical simulation in this paper can be applied to other space-borne interferometers for gravitational wave detection with the simplification of having only one interferometer.
[35]  oai:arXiv.org:1104.5049  [pdf] - 611248
Dark energy, co-evolution of massive black holes with galaxies, and ASTROD-GW
Comments: 20 pages,5 figures, Paper (COSPAR paper number H05-0017-10) presented in the 38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 18-25 July 2010, Bremen, Germany (2010), accepted version for Advances in Space Research, with slightly inclined orbit configuration of ASTROD-GW added and exposition of scientific goals extended
Submitted: 2011-04-26, last modified: 2012-09-18
The detection of low frequency band (100 nHz-100 mHz) and very low frequency band (300 pHz-100 nHz) gravitational waves (GWs) is important for exploration of the equation of state of dark energy and the co-evolution of massive black holes (MBHs) with galaxies. Most galaxies are believed to have a massive black hole in the galactic core. In the formation of these black holes, merging and accretion are the two main processes. Merging of massive black holes generate GWs which could be detected by space GW detectors and pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) to cosmological distances. LISA (Laser-Interferometric Space Antenna) is most sensitive to the frequency band 1 mHz-100 mHz, ASTROD-GW (ASTROD [Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices] optimized for Gravitation Wave detection) is most sensitive to the frequency band 100 nHz-1 mHz and PTAs are most sensitive to the frequency band 300 pHz-100 nHz. In this paper, we discuss the sensitivities and outlooks of detection of GWs from binary massive black holes in these frequency bands with an emphasis on ASTROD-GW. The GWs generated by the inspirals, merging and subsequent ringdowns of binary black holes are standard sirens to the cosmological distance. Using GW observations, we discuss the methods for determining the equation of state of dark energy and for testing the co-evolution models of massive black holes. The scientific aim of ASTROD-GW is focused for gravitational wave detection at low frequency. The science goals include detection of GWs from MBHs, and Extreme-Mass-Ratio Black Hole Inspirals (EMRI), and using these observations to find the evolution of the equation of state of dark energy and to explore the co-evolution of massive black holes with galaxies.
[36]  oai:arXiv.org:1205.5175  [pdf] - 645952
Orbit optimization for ASTROD-GW and its time delay interferometry with two arms using CGC ephemeris
Comments: 17 pages, 7 figures, 1 table
Submitted: 2012-05-23
ASTROD-GW (ASTROD [Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices] optimized for Gravitation Wave detection) is an optimization of ASTROD to focus on the goal of detection of gravitation waves. The detection sensitivity is shifted 52 times toward larger wavelength compared to that of LISA. The mission orbits of the 3 spacecraft forming a nearly equilateral triangular array are chosen to be near the Sun-Earth Lagrange points L3, L4 and L5. The 3 spacecraft range interferometrically with one another with arm length about 260 million kilometers. In order to attain the requisite sensitivity for ASTROD-GW, laser frequency noise must be suppressed below the secondary noises such as the optical path noise, acceleration noise etc. For suppressing laser frequency noise, we need to use time delay interferometry (TDI) to match the two different optical paths (times of travel). Since planets and other solar-system bodies perturb the orbits of ASTROD-GW spacecraft and affect the (TDI), we simulate the time delay numerically using CGC 2.7 ephemeris framework. To conform to the ASTROD-GW planning, we work out a set of 20-year optimized mission orbits of ASTROD-GW spacecraft starting at June 21, 2028, and calculate the residual optical path differences in the first and second generation TDI for one-detector case. In our optimized mission orbits for 20 years, changes of arm length are less than 0.0003 AU; the relative Doppler velocities are less than 3m/s. All the second generation TDI for one-detector case satisfies the ASTROD-GW requirement.
[37]  oai:arXiv.org:1204.1859  [pdf] - 497589
Equivalence Principles, Lense-Thirring Effects, and Solar-System Tests of Cosmological Models
Comments: 7 pages, 1 table, plenary talk presented at ICGAC10 (Xth International Conference on Gravitation, Astrophysics and Cosmology), Quy-Nhon, Vietnam, December 17-22, 2011
Submitted: 2012-04-09
In this talk, we review the empirical status for modern gravitational theories with emphases on (i) Equivalence Principles; (ii) Lense-Thirring effects and the implications of Gravity Probe B experiment; (iii) Solar-System Tests of Cosmological Models.
[38]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.2465  [pdf] - 486800
Solar-system tests of the inflation model with a Weyl term
Comments: 13 pages
Submitted: 2012-03-12
Recently, there has been an interest in inflation and modified gravity with a Weyl term added to the general-relativistic action (N. Derulle, M. Sasaki, Y. Sendouda and A. Youssef, JCAP, 3, 040 (2011)). In this paper we study empirical constraint on this modified gravity from solar-system experiments/observations. We first derive linearized equation of motion in the weak field limit and solve it for isolated system in the slow motion limit. We then use it to derive the light propagation equations, and obtain the relativistic Shapiro time delay and the light deflection in one-body central problem. Applying these results to the solar-system measurements, we obtain constraints on the Weyl term parameter {\gamma}_W; the most stringent constraint, which comes from the Cassini relativistic time delay experiment, is for {\gamma}_W to be less than 0.0015 AU^2, or |{\gamma}_W|^(1/2) less than 0.039 AU (19 s). Analysis of precision laboratory gravity experiments put further limit on the Weyl term parameter {\gamma}_W to below the laboratory scale.
[39]  oai:arXiv.org:1109.5501  [pdf] - 491606
Foundations of Electromagnetism, Equivalence Principles and Cosmic Interactions
Comments: 25 pages, 4 figures, 2 pages, it is written as a chapter for the book "Electromagnetism" (ISBN 979-953-307-400-8) to be published by INTECH (open access), December, 2011
Submitted: 2011-09-26
We look at the foundations of electromagnetism in this chapter of the "eletromagnetism" book. For doing this, after some review (constraints on photon mass etc.), we use two approaches. The first one is to formulate a Parametrized Post-Maxwellian framework to include QED corrections and a pseudoscalar photon interaction. We discuss various vacuum birefringence experiments - ongoing and proposed - to measure these parameters. The second approach is to look at electromagnetism in gravity and various experiments and observations to determine its empirical foundation. We found that the foundation is solid with the only exception of a potentially possible pseudoscalar-photon interaction. We discussed its experimental constraints and look forward to more future experiments.
[40]  oai:arXiv.org:1109.0581  [pdf] - 1579379
Pseudoscalar-photon Interactions, Axions, Non-Minimal Extensions, and Their Empirical Constraints from Observations
Comments: 8 pages
Submitted: 2011-09-02
Pseudoscalar-photon interactions were proposed in the study of the relations among equivalence principles. The interaction of pseudoscalar axion with gluons was proposed as a way to solve the strong CP problem. Subsequent proposal of axion as a dark matter candidate has been a focus of search. Motivation from superstring theories add to its importance. After a brief introduction and historical review, we present (i) the current status of our optical experiment using high-finesse Fabry-Perot resonant cavity - Q & A experiment - to detect pseudoscalar-photon interactions, (ii) the constraints on pseudoscalar-photon interactions from astrophysical and cosmological observations on cosmic polarization rotation, and (iii) theoretical models of non-minimal interactions of gravitational, electromagnetic and pseudoscalar (axion) fields, and their relevance to cosmology.
[41]  oai:arXiv.org:1105.4305  [pdf] - 400358
Rotation, Equivalence Principle, and GP-B Experiment
Comments: 9 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables
Submitted: 2011-05-21
The ultra-precise Gravity Probe B experiment measured the frame-dragging effect and geodetic precession on four quartz gyros. We use this result to test WEP II (Weak Equivalence Principle II) which includes rotation in the universal free-fall motion. The free-fall E\"otv\"os parameter eta for rotating body is < = 10**(-11) with four-order improvement over previous results. The anomalous torque per unit angular momentum parameter lambda is constrained to (-0.05 +- 3.67) \times 10**(-15) s-1, (0.24 +- 0.98) \times 10**(-15) s-1, and (0 +- 3.6) \times 10**(-13) s-1 respectively in the directions of geodetic effect, frame-dragging effect and angular momentum axis; the dimensionless frequency-dependence parameter {\kappa} is constrained to (1.75 +- 4.96) \times 10**(-17), (1.80 +- 1.34) \times 10**(-17), and (0 +- 3) \times 10**(-14) respectively.
[42]  oai:arXiv.org:1104.0060  [pdf] - 580928
Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices I (ASTROD I) - A class-M fundamental physics mission proposal for Cosmic Vision 2015-2025: 2010 Update
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures, 1 table, based on our 2010 proposal submitted for the ESA call for class-M mission proposals, a sequel and an update to previous paper [Experimental Astronomy 23 (2009) 491-527] which was based on our last proposal submitted for the 2007 ESA call, submitted to Experimental Astronomy
Submitted: 2011-03-31
This paper on ASTROD I is based on our 2010 proposal submitted for the ESA call for class-M mission proposals, and is a sequel and an update to our previous paper [Experimental Astronomy 23 (2009) 491-527; designated as Paper I] which was based on our last proposal submitted for the 2007 ESA call. In this paper, we present our orbit selection with one Venus swing-by together with orbit simulation. In Paper I, our orbit choice is with two Venus swing-bys. The present choice takes shorter time (about 250 days) to reach the opposite side of the Sun. We also present a preliminary design of the optical bench, and elaborate on the solar physics goals with the radiation monitor payload. We discuss telescope size, trade-offs of drag-free sensitivities, thermal issues and present an outlook. ASTROD I is a planned interplanetary space mission with multiple goals. The primary aims are: to test General Relativity with an improvement in sensitivity of over 3 orders of magnitude, improving our understanding of gravity and aiding the development of a new quantum gravity theory; to measure key solar system parameters with increased accuracy, advancing solar physics and our knowledge of the solar system; and to measure the time rate of change of the gravitational constant with an order of magnitude improvement and the anomalous Pioneer acceleration, thereby probing dark matter and dark energy gravitationally. It is envisaged as the first in a series of ASTROD missions. ASTROD I will consist of one spacecraft carrying a telescope, four lasers, two event timers and a clock. Two-way, two-wavelength laser pulse ranging will be used between the spacecraft in a solar orbit and deep space laser stations on Earth, to achieve the ASTROD I goals.
[43]  oai:arXiv.org:1003.3899  [pdf] - 172858
Gravitational waves, dark energy and inflation
Comments: 13 pages, 1 figure, invited talk presented to the International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry (Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China, Nov. 20-21 2009); Proceedings to be published in Modern Physics Letters.
Submitted: 2010-03-19
In this paper we first present a complete classification of gravitational waves according to their frequencies: (i) Ultra high frequency band (above 1 THz); (ii) Very high frequency band (100 kHz - 1 THz); (iii) High frequency band (10 Hz - 100 kHz); (iv) Middle frequency band (0.1 Hz - 10 Hz); (v) Low frequency band (100 nHz - 0.1 Hz); (vi) Very low frequency band (300 pHz - 100 nHz); (vii) Ultra low frequency band (10 fHz - 300 pHz); (viii) Hubble (extremely low) frequency band (1 aHz - 10 fHz); (ix) Infra-Hubble frequency band (below 1 aHz). After briefly discussing the method of detection for different frequency bands, we review the concept and status of space gravitational-wave missions --- LISA, ASTROD, ASTROD-GW, Super-ASTROD, DECIGO and Big Bang Observer. We then address to the determination of dark energy equation, and probing the inflationary physics using space gravitational wave detectors.
[44]  oai:arXiv.org:0911.2946  [pdf] - 902437
Non-minimal coupling of photons and axions
Comments: 31 pages, 2 Tables; replaced with the final version published in Classical and Quantum Gravity
Submitted: 2009-11-15, last modified: 2010-03-01
We establish a new self-consistent system of equations accounting for a non-minimal interaction of gravitational, electromagnetic and axion fields. The procedure is based on a non-minimal extension of the standard Einstein-Maxwell-axion action. The general properties of a ten-parameter family of non-minimal linear models are discussed. We apply this theory to the models with pp-wave symmetry and consider propagation of electromagnetic waves non-minimally coupled to the gravitational and axion fields. We focus on exact solutions of electrodynamic equations, which describe quasi-minimal and non-minimal optical activity induced by the axion field. We also discuss empirical constraints on coupling parameters from astrophysical birefringence and polarization rotation observations.
[45]  oai:arXiv.org:1001.4325  [pdf] - 172832
Axion Search with Q & A Experiment
Comments: 10 pages, 3 tables and 3 figures, presented in the International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry (Hsinchu, Taiwan, Nov. 20-21 2009); submitted to Modern Physics Letters. Rev. 2 is replaced for other collaborations' status/new-result corrections in Table 2, and 2 ref.s are added
Submitted: 2010-01-25, last modified: 2010-01-31
Dark matter is a focused issue in galactic evolution and cosmology. Axion is a viable particle candidate for dark matter. Its interaction with photon is an effective way to detect it, e.g., pseudoscalar-photon interaction will generate vacuum dichroism in a magnetic field. Motivated to measure the QED vacuum birefringence and to detect pseudoscalar-photon interaction, we started to build up the Q & A experiment (QED [Quantum Electrodynamics] and Axion experiment) in 1994. In this talk, we first give a brief historical account of planet hunting and dark matter evidence. We then review our 3.5 m Fabry-Perot interferometer together with our results of measuring vacuum dichroism and gaseous Cotton-Mouton effects. Our first results give (-0.2 $\pm$ 2.8) $\times$ 10$^{-13}$ rad/pass, at 2.3 T with 18,700 passes through a 0.6 m long magnet, for vacuum dichroism measurement. We are upgrading our interferometer to 7 m arm-length with a new 1.8 m 2.3 T permanent magnet capable of rotation up to 13 cycles per second. We aim at 10 nrad/Hz$^{1/2}$ optical sensitivity with 532 nm cavity finesse around 100,000. When achieved, vacuum dichroism would be measured to 8.6 $\times$ 10$^{-17}$ rad/pass in about 50 days, and QED birefringence would be measured to 28 %.
[46]  oai:arXiv.org:0912.5057  [pdf] - 163203
Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity
Comments: 56 pages, 7 figures, 7 tables, invited review accepted for Reports on Progress of Physics
Submitted: 2009-12-27
Spin is fundamental in physics. Gravitation is universal. Searches for the role of spin in gravitation dated before the firm establishment of the electron spin in 1925. Since mass and spin or helicity in the case of zero mass are the only invariants of the Poincare group and mass participates in universal gravitation, these searches are natural steps to pursue. Here we review both the theoretical and experimental efforts in searching for the role of spin/polarization in gravitation. We discuss torsion, Poincare gauge theories, teleparallel theories, metric-affine connection theories and pseudoscalar (axion) theories. We discuss laboratory searches for electron and nucleus spin-couplings -- the weak equivalence principle experiments for polarized-bodies, the finite-range spin-coupling experiments, the spin-spin coupling experiments and the cosmic-spin coupling experiments. The role played by angular momentum and rotation is explicitly discussed. We discuss astrophysical and cosmological searches for photon polarization coupling. Investigation in the implications and interrelations of equivalence principles led to a possible pseudoscalar or vector interaction, and led to the proposal of WEP II (Weak Equivalence Principle II) which include rotation in the universal free-fall motion. Evidences for WEP II are discussed and compiled.
[47]  oai:arXiv.org:0905.2508  [pdf] - 121240
Direct Detection of the Primordial Inflationary Gravitational Waves
Comments: 6 pages, 1 figure, received an honorable mention in the 2009 Essay Competition of the Gravity Research Foundation
Submitted: 2009-05-15
Inflationary cosmology is successful in explaining a number of outstanding cosmological issues including the flatness, the horizon and the relic issues. More spectacular is the experimental confirmation of the structure as arose from the inflationary quantum fluctuations. However, the physics in the inflationary era is unclear. Polarization observations of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) missions may detect the tensor mode effects of inflationary gravitational waves (GWs) and give an energy scale of inflation. To probe the inflationary physics, direct observation of gravitational waves generated in the inflationary era is needed. In this essay, we advocate that the direct observation of these GWs with sensitivity Omega-gw down to 10**(-23) is possible using present projected technology development if foreground could be separated.
[48]  oai:arXiv.org:0903.0756  [pdf] - 22036
Cosmic Polarization Rotation, Cosmological Models, and the Detectability of Primordial Gravitational Waves
Comments: 8 pages, 2 figures, 1 table, talk given in Particle Physics, Astrophysics & Quantum Field Theory: 75 Years since Solvay (PAQFT08), 27th-29th November, 2008, submitted to International Journal of Modern Physics A
Submitted: 2009-03-04
CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background) polarization observations test many aspects of cosmological models. Effective pseudoscalar-photon interaction(s) would induce a rotation of linear polarization of electromagnetic wave propagating with cosmological distance in various cosmological models. CMB polarization observations are superb tests of these models and have the potential to discover new fundamental physics. Pseudoscalar-photon interaction is proportional to the gradient of the pseudoscalar field. From phenomenological point of view, this gradient could be neutrino number asymmetry, other density current, or a constant vector. In these situations, Lorentz invariance or CPT may effectively be violated. In this paper, we review these results and anticipate what more precise observations can tell us about fundamental physics, inflation, etc. Better accuracy in CMB polarization observation is expected from PLANCK mission to be launched this year. Dedicated CMB polarization observers like B-Pol mission, CMBpol mission and LiteBIRD mission would probe this fundamental issue more deeply in the future. With these sensitivities, cosmic polarization rotations from effective pseudoscalar-photon interaction, Faraday polarization rotations from primordial and large-scale magnetic field, and tensor modes effects would have chances to be detected and distinguished. The subtracted tensor-mode effects are likely due to primordial gravitational waves. We discuss the direct detectability of these primordial gravitational waves using space GW detectors.
[49]  oai:arXiv.org:0812.0887  [pdf] - 19156
Super-ASTROD: Probing primordial gravitational waves and mapping the outer solar system
Comments: 7 pages, 1 figure, presented to 7th International LISA Symposium, 16-20 June 2008, Barcelona; submitted to Classical and Quantum Gravity; presentation improved
Submitted: 2008-12-04, last modified: 2009-01-30
Super-ASTROD (Super Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices or ASTROD III) is a mission concept with 3-5 spacecraft in 5 AU orbits together with an Earth-Sun L1/L2 spacecraft ranging optically with one another to probe primordial gravitational-waves with frequencies 0.1 microHz - 1 mHz, to test fundamental laws of spacetime and to map the outer solar system. In this paper we address to its scientific goals, orbit and payload selection, and sensitivity to gravitational waves.
[50]  oai:arXiv.org:0802.0582  [pdf] - 9771
Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices I (ASTROD I) - A class-M fundamental physics mission proposal for Cosmic Vision 2015-2025
Comments: 26 pages, 11 figures, shortened from the original cosmic vision proposal, submitted to Experimental Astronomy; this version, shortened to 25 pages, re-organized and added references, is accepted for publication in Experimental Astronomy
Submitted: 2008-02-05, last modified: 2008-12-12
ASTROD I is a planned interplanetary space mission with multiple goals. The primary aims are: to test General Relativity with an improvement in sensitivity of over 3 orders of magnitude, improving our understanding of gravity and aiding the development of a new quantum gravity theory; to measure key solar system parameters with increased accuracy, advancing solar physics and our knowledge of the solar system and to measure the time rate of change of the gravitational constant with an order of magnitude improvement and the anomalous Pioneer acceleration, thereby probing dark matter and dark energy gravitationally. It is an international project, with major contributions from Europe and China and is envisaged as the first in a series of ASTROD missions. ASTROD I will consist of one spacecraft carrying a telescope, four lasers, two event timers and a clock. Two-way, two-wavelength laser pulse ranging will be used between the spacecraft in a solar orbit and deep space laser stations on Earth, to achieve the ASTROD I goals. A second mission, ASTROD II is envisaged as a three-spacecraft mission which would test General Relativity to one part per billion, enable detection of solar g-modes, measure the solar Lense-Thirring effect to 10 parts per million, and probe gravitational waves at frequencies below the LISA bandwidth. In the third phase (ASTROD III or Super-ASTROD), larger orbits could be implemented to map the outer solar system and to probe primordial gravitational-waves at frequencies below the ASTROD II bandwidth.
[51]  oai:arXiv.org:0712.4082  [pdf] - 8465
From Equivalence Principles to Cosmology: Cosmic Polarization Rotation, CMB Observation, Neutrino Number Asymmetry, Lorentz Invariance and CPT
Comments: 9 pages, 2 figures, a few references with corresponding text change added in this version, invited talk given in VIII Asia-Pacific International Conference on Gravitation and Astophysics (ICGA8), August 29 - September 1, 2007, Nara Women's University, Japan, submitted to Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement
Submitted: 2007-12-25, last modified: 2008-02-23
In this paper, we review the approach leading to cosmic polarization rotation observation and present the current status with an outlook. In the study of the relations among equivalence principles, we found that long-range pseudoscalar-photon interaction is allowed. Pseudoscalar-photon interaction would induce a rotation of linear polarization of electromagnetic wave propagating with cosmological/astrophysical distance. In 2002, DASI successfully observed the polarization of the cosmological microwave background radiation. In 2003, WMAP observed the correlation of polarization with temperature anisotropy at more than 10 sigma in the cosmological microwave background. From this high polarization-temperature correlation in WMAP observation, we put a limit of 0.1 rad on the rotation of linear polarization of cosmological microwave background (CMB) propagation. Pseudoscalar-photon interaction is proportional to the gradient of the pseudoscalar field. From phenomenological point of view, this gradient could be neutrino number asymmetry current, other density current, or a constant vector. In these situations, Lorentz invariance or CPT may or may not effectively be violated. In this paper, we review and compile various results. Better accuracy in CMB polarization observation is expected from PLANCK mission to be launched next year. A dedicated CMB polarization observer in the future would probe this fundamental issue more deeply.
[52]  oai:arXiv.org:0802.1614  [pdf] - 9974
Detecting solar g-modes with ASTROD
Comments: HELAS II international conference "Helioseismology, asteroseismology and MHD connections", 20-24 August 2007, Goettingen, Germany
Submitted: 2008-02-12
We present an up-to-date estimate for the prospect of using the Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices (ASTROD) for an unambiguous detection of solar g modes (f < 400 micro Hertz) through their gravitational signature. There are currently two major efforts to detect low-frequency gravitational effects, ASTROD and the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). Using the most recent g mode surface amplitude estimates, both observational and theoretical, it is unclear whether LISA will be capable of successfully detecting these modes. The ASTROD project may be better suited for detection as its sensitivity curve is shifted towards lower frequencies with the best sensitivity occurring in the range 100-300 micro Hertz.
[53]  oai:arXiv.org:0712.2492  [pdf] - 8164
ASTROD and ASTROD I -- Overview and Progress
Comments: 17 pages, 6 figures, presented to The Third International ASTROD Symposium on Laser Astrodynamics, Space Test of Relativity and Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Beijing, July 14-16, 2006; International Journal of Modern Physics D, in press (2008)
Submitted: 2007-12-14
In this paper, we present an overview of ASTROD (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices) and ASTROD I mission concepts and studies. The missions employ deep-space laser ranging using drag-free spacecraft to map the gravitational field in the solar-system. The solar-system gravitational field is determined by three factors: the dynamic distribution of matter in the solar system; the dynamic distribution of matter outside the solar system (galactic, cosmological, etc.) and gravitational waves propagating through the solar system. Different relativistic theories of gravity make different predictions of the solar-system gravitational field. Hence, precise measurements of the solar-system gravitational field test all these. The tests and observations include: (i) a precise determination of the relativistic parameters beta and gamma with 3-5 orders of magnitude improvement over previous measurements; (ii) a 1-2 order of magnitude improvement in the measurement of G-dot; (iii) a precise determination of any anomalous, constant acceleration Aa directed towards the Sun; (iv) a measurement of solar angular momentum via the Lense-Thirring effect; (v) the detection of solar g-mode oscillations via their changing gravity field, thus, providing a new eye to see inside the Sun; (vi) precise determination of the planetary orbit elements and masses; (viii) better determination of the orbits and masses of major asteroids; (ix) detection and observation of gravitational waves from massive black holes and galactic binary stars in the frequency range 0.05 mHz to 5 mHz; and (x) exploring background gravitational-waves.
[54]  oai:arXiv.org:0711.0253  [pdf] - 6638
Light deflection in the second post-Newtonian approximation of scalar-tensor theory of gravity
Comments: 2 pages, presented to IAU Symposium No. 248, A Giant Step: from Milli- to Micro-Arcsecond Astrometry (Shanghai, October 15-19, 2007)
Submitted: 2007-11-02
In this paper, we use the metric coefficients and the equation of motion in the 2nd post-Newtonian approximation in scalar-tensor theory including intermediate range gravity to derive the deflection of light and compare it with previous works. These results will be useful for precision astrometry missions like GAIA (Global Astrometric Interferometer of Astrophysics), SIMS (The Space Interferometry Mission) and LATOR (Laser Astrometric Test Of Relativity) which aim at astrometry with microarcsecond and nanoarcsecond accuracies and need 2nd post-Newtonian framework and ephemeris to determine the stellar and spacecraft positions.
[55]  oai:arXiv.org:0710.5624  [pdf] - 6544
Deep-space laser-ranging missions ASTROD (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices) and ASTROD I for astrodynamics and astrometry
Comments: 5 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables, presented to IAU Symposium No. 248, A Giant Step: from Milli- to Micro-Arcsecond Astrometry (Shanghai, October 15-19, 2007)
Submitted: 2007-10-30
Deep-space laser ranging will be ideal for testing relativistic gravity, and mapping the solar-system to an unprecedented accuracy. ASTROD (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices) and ASTROD I are such missions. ASTROD I is a mission with a single spacecraft; it is the first step of ASTROD with 3 spacecraft. In this talk, after a brief review of ASTROD and ASTROD I, we concentrate of the precision of solar astrodynamics that can be achieved together with implications on astrometry and reference frame transformations. The precision planetary ephemeris derived from these missions together with second post-Newtonian test of relativistic gravity will serve as a foundation for future precise astrometry observations. Relativistic frameworks are discussed from these considerations.
[56]  oai:arXiv.org:0710.4650  [pdf] - 6380
Time transfer by laser link between China and France
Comments: 2 pages, 1 figure, 1 table; presented in IAU 248"A giant step: from milli- to micro-arcsecond astrometry" conference
Submitted: 2007-10-25
To advance from milli-arcsecond to micro-arcsecond astrometry, time keeping capability and its comparison among different stations need to be improved and enhanced. The T2L2 (Time transfer by laser link) experiment under development at OCA and CNES to be launched in 2008 on Jason-2, allows the synchronization of remote clocks on Earth. It is based on the propagation of light pulses in space which is better controlled than the radio waves propagation. In this paper, characteristics are presented for both common view and non-common view T2L2 comparisons of clocks between China and France.
[57]  oai:arXiv.org:0707.1930  [pdf] - 1000439
Improved Simulation of the Mass Charging for ASTROD I
Comments: 20 pages, 14 figures, submitted to International Journal of Modern Physics D
Submitted: 2007-07-13
The electrostatic charging of the test mass in ASTROD I (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices I) mission can affect the quality of the science data as a result of spurious Coulomb and Lorentz forces. To estimate the size of the resultant disturbances, credible predictions of charging rates and the charging noise are required. Using the GEANT4 software toolkit, we present a detailed Monte Carlo simulation of the ASTROD I test mass charging due to exposure of the spacecraft to galactic cosmic-ray (GCR) protons and alpha particles (3He, 4He) in the space environment. A positive charging rate of 33.3 e+/s at solar minimum is obtained. This figure reduces by 50% at solar maximum. Based on this charging rate and factoring in the contribution of minor cosmic-ray components, we calculate the acceleration noise and stiffness associated with charging. We conclude that the acceleration noise arising from Coulomb and Lorentz effects are well below the ASTROD I acceleration noise limit at 0.1 mHz both at solar minimum and maximum. The coherent Fourier components due to charging are investigated, it needs to be studied carefully in order to ensure that these do not compromise the quality of science data in the ASTROD I mission.
[58]  oai:arXiv.org:0704.3493  [pdf] - 783
Simulation of ASTROD I test mass charging due to solar energetic particles
Comments: 10 pages,8 figures, COSPAR2006 H0.1-1, submitted
Submitted: 2007-04-26
As ASTROD I travels through space, its test mass will accrue charge due to galactic cosmic-rays and solar energetic particles incident on the spacecraft. This test mass charge will result in Coulomb forces between the test mass and the surrounding electrodes. In earlier work using the GEANT4 toolkit, we predicted a net charging rate of nearly 9.0 +e/s from cosmic-ray protons between 0.1 and 1000 GeV at solar maximum, and rising to 26.5 +e/s at solar minimum. Here we use GEANT4 to simulate the charging process due to solar energetic particle events and to estimate the magnitude of acceleration noise due to this charging. The predicted charging rates range from 2840 to 64300 +e/s, at peak intensity, for the 4 largest SEP events in September and October 1989. For the 2 larger events, the acceleration disturbances due to charging exceeds the ASTROD I acceleration noise budget requirement. Continuous discharge should be considered for suppressing this charging noise. The acceleration noise during the 2 small events is well below the design target, although during these events, the net charging rate will be dominated by these solar fluxes.
[59]  oai:arXiv.org:0704.3333  [pdf] - 749
The Low Frequency Sensitivity to Gravitational Waves for ASTROD
Comments: 21 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in General Relativity and Gravitation
Submitted: 2007-04-25
ASTROD is a relativity mission concept encompassing multi-purposes. One of its main purposes is to detect gravitational waves sensitive to low-frequency band similar to LISA, but shifted to lower frequencies. In this aspect, ASTROD would complement LISA in probing the Universe and study strong-field black hole physics. Since ASTROD will be after LISA, in the Cosmic Vision time-frame 2015-2025, a ten-fold improvement over LISA accelerometer noise goal would be possible, allowing us to test relativistic gravity to 1 ppb and improve the gravitational-wave sensitivity. In this paper, we address to this possible improvement, especially in the frequency range below 0.1 mHz. We look into possible thermal noise improvement, magnetic noise improvement, spurious discharging noise improvement and local gravitational noise improvement. We discuss various possibilities of lower-frequency gravitational-wave responses and their significance to potential astrophysical sources.
[60]  oai:arXiv.org:0704.3303  [pdf] - 744
ASTROD I Charging Simulation and Disturbances
Comments: 17 pages, 11 figures, submitted to General Relativity and Gravitation
Submitted: 2007-04-24
ASTROD I is planned as a single spacecraft mission. It will use interferometric and pulse ranging techniques between the spacecraft and ground stations, to make high precision measurements of the parameters that describe the solar system, and to test relativistic gravity with improved accuracy. At the heart of the spacecraft is a test mass, which the spacecraft will follow using a drag-free control system. The mission critically depends on maintaining the geodesic motion of the test mass. Charging of the test mass due to cosmic rays and solar particles will disturb its geodesic motion. We have modelled the charging process using the GEANT4 toolkit and a simplified, geometrical model and estimate that the ASTROD I test mass will charge positively, at a rate of 24 +/-7 e+/s, due to cosmic ray protons and alpha particles (3He and 4He) at solar minimum. We have used the results of this simulation to estimate the magnitude of disturbances associated with test mass charging, for the worst-case scenario, taking into account uncertainties in the model and potential charging contributions from minor cosmic-ray components.
[61]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ex/0611050  [pdf] - 113370
Q & A Experiment to Search for Vacuum Dichroism, Pseudoscalar-Photon Interaction and Millicharged Fermions
Comments: 21 pages, 13 figures, submitted to Modern Physics Letters
Submitted: 2006-11-28
A number of experiments are underway to detect vacuum birefringence and dichroism -- PVLAS, Q & A, and BMV. Recently, PVLAS experiment has observed optical rotation in vacuum by a magnetic field (vacuum dichroism). Theoretical interpretations of this result include a possible pseudoscalar-photon interaction and the existence of millicharged fermions. Here, we report the progress and first results of Q & A (QED [quantum electrodynamics] and Axion) experiment proposed and started in 1994. A 3.5-m high-finesse (around 30,000) Fabry-Perot prototype detector extendable to 7-m has been built and tested. We use X-pendulums and automatic control schemes developed by the gravitational-wave detection community for mirror suspension and cavity control. To polarize the vacuum, we use a 2.3-T dipole permanent magnet, with 27-mm-diameter clear borehole and 0.6-m field length,. In the experiment, the magnet is rotated at 5-10 rev/s to generate time-dependent polarization signal with twice the rotation frequency. Our ellipsometer/polarization-rotation-detection-system is formed by a pair of Glan-Taylor type polarizing prisms with extinction ratio lower than 10-8 together with a polarization modulating Faraday Cell with/without a quarter wave plate. We made an independent calibration of our apparatus by performing a measurement of gaseous Cotton-Mouton effect of nitrogen. We present our first experimental results and give a brief discussion of our experimental limit on pseudo-scalar-photon interaction and millicharged fermions.
[62]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0504116  [pdf] - 898960
Empirical Foundations of Relativistic Gravity
Comments: 18 pages; International Journal of Modern Physics D, in press (World Scientific, 2005); 100 Years of Gravity and Accelerated Frames--The Deepest Insights of Einstein and Yang-Mills (Ed. J. P. Hsu and D. Fine, in press, World Scientific, 2005)
Submitted: 2005-04-24
In 1859, Le Verrier discovered the mercury perihelion advance anomaly. This anomaly turned out to be the first relativistic-gravity effect observed. During the 141 years to 2000, the precisions of laboratory and space experiments, and astrophysical and cosmological observations on relativistic gravity have been improved by 3 orders of magnitude. In 1999, we envisaged a 3-6 order improvement in the next 30 years in all directions of tests of relativistic gravity. In 2000, the interferometric gravitational wave detectors began their runs to accumulate data. In 2003, the measurement of relativistic Shapiro time-delay of the Cassini spacecraft determined the relativistic-gravity parameter gamma&#947; with a 1.5-order improvement. In October 2004, Ciufolini and Pavlis reported a measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect on the LAGEOS and LAGEOS2 satellites to 10 percent of the value predicted by general relativity. In April 2004, Gravity Probe B was launched and has been accumulating science data for more than 170 days now. MICROSCOPE is on its way for a 2007 launch to test Galileo equivalence principle to 10-15. STEP (Satellite Test of Equivalence Principle), and ASTROD (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices) are in the good planning stage. Various astrophysical tests and cosmological tests of relativistic gravity will reach precision and ultra-precision stages. Clock tests and atomic interferometry tests of relativistic gravity will reach an ever-increasing precision. These will give revived interest and development both in experimental and theoretical aspects of gravity, and may lead to answers to some profound questions of gravity and the cosmos.
[63]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407606  [pdf] - 66448
Asteroid Perturbations and Mass Determination for the ASTROD Space Mission
Comments: 6 pages; 3 figures; presented to 33rd COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Warsaw, 16-23 July, 2000; submitted to Advances in Space Research
Submitted: 2004-07-29
Due to the high-precision nature of the ASTROD (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices) mission concept, the asteroid perturbations on the ASTROD spacecraft is crucial. These perturbations need to be modelled and determined together with relativistic effects and other solar-system parameters. In a previous investigation (Su et al., Planetary and Space Science, 47, 339-43[1999]), we used the mass estimation of Ceres, Pallas and Vesta in the literature to calculate their perturbations on the ASTROD spacecraft. Recently, we established an ephemeris framework (CGC 1) including the 3 big asteroids and used this ephemeris framework to simulate the determination of their masses together with other solar-system parameters and relativistic-gravity parameters. In this paper, we extend the CGC 1 to CGC 2 ephemeris framework to include 492 asteroids (with diameter > 65 km) . We then use CGC 2 to simulate the determination of ten parameters -- the masses of Ceres, Pallas and Vesta, the six average densities for the other 489 asteroids, classified into C, S,M,E,G and U types, and the rate of change of the gravitational constant G. The fractional mass uncertainties for Ceres, Pallas and Vesta are about 10**(-3)-10**(-4); the fractional density uncertainties for six types of asteroids are about 10**(-2)-10**(-3); that for G-dot/G is about 10**(-14)-10**(-15)/yr. This mass and density determination will be useful for the determination and understanding of the structure and origin of asteroids.
[64]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407570  [pdf] - 576883
Orbit Simulation for the Determination of Relativistic and Solar-System Parameters for the ASTROD Space Mission
Comments: 6 pages; 4 figures; presented to 33rd COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Warsaw, 16-23 July, 2000; submitted to Advances in Space Research
Submitted: 2004-07-28
ASTROD (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices) mission concept is to conduct high-precision measurement of relativistic effects,solar-system parameters and gravitational waves. In this paper, we first extend the stochastic model to simulate the determination of the masses of three big asteroids (Ceres, Vesta and Pallas). With one range observation per day for each spacecraft from 25 days to 800 days of the mission and ten range observations per day for each spacecraft from 800 days to 1050 days of the mission (when the apparent positions of the two spacecraft are close to the Sun), the accuracies of determining these parameters are 4.6*10**(-7) for gamma, 4.0*10**(-7) for beta, 1.2*10**(-8) for J2, and 6.4*10**(-5) M_Ceres, 7.6*10**(-4) M_Pallas, 8.1*10**(-5) M_Vesta for the mass determination of Ceres, Pallas and Vesta respectively. We then include in the simulation and determination the rate of change of the gravitational constant (G-dot), and an anomalous constant acceleration (aa) directed towards the Sun (Pioneer Anomaly). At the end of 1050 days of simulation, the accuracies of determining these two parameters are 9.5*10**(-15)/yr for G-dot/G and 2.0*10**(-16) m/s2 for a_a. The mass loss rate of the inner solar system is at the level of 1*10**(-13) M_Sun/yr. The accurate determinat-ion of &#288;/G will mean a need to simultaneously determine the mass loss rate. In other words, the mission gives a way to monitor the mass loss rate of the Sun if &#288;/G can be determined independently.