Normalized to: Lilley, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.04997 [pdf] - 2131947
Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data
processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Andersen, K. J.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Svalheim, T. L.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-07-09
We present the NPIPE processing pipeline, which produces calibrated frequency
maps in temperature and polarization from data from the Planck Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI) and High Frequency Instrument (HFI) using high-performance
computers. NPIPE represents a natural evolution of previous Planck analysis
efforts, and combines some of the most powerful features of the separate LFI
and HFI analysis pipelines. The net effect of the improvements is lower levels
of noise and systematics in both frequency and component maps at essentially
all angular scales, as well as notably improved internal consistency between
the various frequency channels. Based on the NPIPE maps, we present the first
estimate of the Solar dipole determined through component separation across all
nine Planck frequencies. The amplitude is ($3366.6 \pm 2.7$)$\mu$K, consistent
with, albeit slightly higher than, earlier estimates. From the large-scale
polarization data, we derive an updated estimate of the optical depth of
reionization of $\tau = 0.051 \pm 0.006$, which appears robust with respect to
data and sky cuts. There are 600 complete signal, noise and systematics
simulations of the full-frequency and detector-set maps. As a Planck first,
these simulations include full time-domain processing of the beam-convolved CMB
anisotropies. The release of NPIPE maps and simulations is accompanied with a
complete suite of raw and processed time-ordered data and the software,
scripts, auxiliary data, and parameter files needed to improve further on the
analysis and to run matching simulations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.09027 [pdf] - 2108902
Assessing the detectability of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave
Background with LISA, using an excess of power approach
Submitted: 2019-06-21, last modified: 2020-06-08
The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna will be the first Gravitational Wave
observatory in space. It is scheduled to fly in the early 2030's. LISA design
predicts sensitivity levels that enable the detection a Stochastic
Gravitational Wave Background signal. This stochastic type of signal is a
superposition of signatures from sources that cannot be resolved individually
and which are of various types, each one contributing with a different spectral
shape. In this work we present a fast methodology to assess the detectability
of a stationary, Gaussian, and isotropic stochastic signal in a set of
frequency bins, combining information from the available data channels. We
derive an analytic expression of the Bayes Factor between the instrumental
noise-only and the signal plus instrumental noise models, that allows us to
compute the detectability bounds of a given signal, as a function of frequency
and prior knowledge on the instrumental noise spectrum.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.01575 [pdf] - 2099179
Effect of filters on the time-delay interferometry residual laser noise
for LISA
Submitted: 2018-11-05, last modified: 2020-05-20
The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is a European Space Agency
mission that aims to measure gravitational waves in the millihertz range. Laser
frequency noise enters the interferometric measurements and dominates the
expected gravitational signals by many orders of magnitude. Time-delay
interferometry (TDI) is a technique that reduces this laser noise by
synthesizing virtual equal-arm interferometric measurements. Laboratory
experiments and numerical simulations have confirmed that this reduction is
sufficient to meet the scientific goals of the mission in proof-of-concept
setups. In this paper, we show that the on-board antialiasing filters play an
important role in TDI's performance when the flexing of the constellation is
accounted for. This coupling was neglected in previous studies. To reach an
optimal reduction level, filters with vanishing group delays must be used on
board or synthesized off-line. We propose a theoretical model of the residual
laser noise including this flexing-filtering coupling. We also use two
independent simulators to produce realistic measurement signals and compute the
corresponding TDI Michelson variables. We show that our theoretical model
agrees with the simulated data with exquisite precision. Using these two
complementary approaches, we confirm TDI's ability to reduce laser frequency
noise in a more realistic mission setup. The theoretical model provides insight
on filter design and implementation.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06205 [pdf] - 2009439
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-12-03
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying
the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009.
It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August
2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine
frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy
of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters
of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on
deviations from that model. The 6-parameter LCDM model continues to provide an
excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift,
describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just
six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power
spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better
than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (theta_*) now
known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the
success of the LCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of
structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes
introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with
other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe
and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and
evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight
areas ripe for further experimental advances.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06209 [pdf] - 1965163
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lemos, P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-09-20
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck
measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the
standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law
spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this
paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in
combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 =
0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar
spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm
0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured
parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is
measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These
results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable,
with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions.
Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters
are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter
$\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 =
0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the
base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra
relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the
neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_\nu< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra
continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base
-$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the
lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not
supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the
background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12875 [pdf] - 1925231
Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-07-30
This paper describes the 2018 Planck CMB likelihoods, following a hybrid
approach similar to the 2015 one, with different approximations at low and high
multipoles, and implementing several methodological and analysis refinements.
With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of
systematics, we can now make full use of the High Frequency Instrument
polarization data. The low-multipole 100x143 GHz EE cross-spectrum constrains
the reionization optical-depth parameter $\tau$ to better than 15% (in
combination with with the other low- and high-$\ell$ likelihoods). We also
update the 2015 baseline low-$\ell$ joint TEB likelihood based on the Low
Frequency Instrument data, which provides a weaker $\tau$ constraint. At high
multipoles, a better model of the temperature-to-polarization leakage and
corrections for the effective calibrations of the polarization channels
(polarization efficiency or PE) allow us to fully use the polarization spectra,
improving the constraints on the $\Lambda$CDM parameters by 20 to 30% compared
to TT-only constraints. Tests on the modelling of the polarization demonstrate
good consistency, with some residual modelling uncertainties, the accuracy of
the PE modelling being the main limitation. Using our various tests,
simulations, and comparison between different high-$\ell$ implementations, we
estimate the consistency of the results to be better than the 0.5$\sigma$
level. Minor curiosities already present before (differences between $\ell$<800
and $\ell$>800 parameters or the preference for more smoothing of the $C_\ell$
peaks) are shown to be driven by the TT power spectrum and are not
significantly modified by the inclusion of polarization. Overall, the legacy
Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological
model and represent a reference for future CMB observations. (Abridged)
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.07475 [pdf] - 1618338
Y-junction intercommutations of current carrying strings
Submitted: 2017-10-20
Under certain conditions the collision and intercommutation of two cosmic
strings can result in the formation of a third string, with the three strings
then remaining connected at Y-junctions. The kinematics and dynamics of
collisions of this type have been the subject of analytical and numerical
analyses in the special case in which the strings are Nambu-Goto. Cosmic
strings, however, may well carry currents, in which case their dynamics is not
given by the Nambu-Goto action. Our aim is to extend the kinematic analysis to
more general kinds of string model. We focus in particular on the collision of
strings described by conservative elastic string models, characteristic of
current carrying strings, and which are expected to form in a cosmological
context. As opposed to Nambu-Goto strings collisions, we show that in this case
the collision cannot lead to the formation of a third elastic string: if
dynamically such a string forms then the joining string must be described by a
more general equation of state. This process will be studied numerically in a
forthcoming publication.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.02487 [pdf] - 1580129
Planck intermediate results. LI. Features in the cosmic microwave
background temperature power spectrum and shifts in cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Narimani, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-08-08, last modified: 2017-04-21
The six parameters of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model have best-fit values
derived from the Planck temperature power spectrum that are shifted somewhat
from the best-fit values derived from WMAP data. These shifts are driven by
features in the Planck temperature power spectrum at angular scales that had
never before been measured to cosmic-variance level precision. We investigate
these shifts to determine whether they are within the range of expectation and
to understand their origin in the data. Taking our parameter set to be the
optical depth of the reionized intergalactic medium $\tau$, the baryon density
$\omega_{\rm b}$, the matter density $\omega_{\rm m}$, the angular size of the
sound horizon $\theta_*$, the spectral index of the primordial power spectrum,
$n_{\rm s}$, and $A_{\rm s}e^{-2\tau}$ (where $A_{\rm s}$ is the amplitude of
the primordial power spectrum), we examine the change in best-fit values
between a WMAP-like large angular-scale data set (with multipole moment
$\ell<800$ in the Planck temperature power spectrum) and an all angular-scale
data set ($\ell<2500$ Planck temperature power spectrum), each with a prior on
$\tau$ of $0.07\pm0.02$. We find that the shifts, in units of the 1$\sigma$
expected dispersion for each parameter, are $\{\Delta \tau, \Delta A_{\rm s}
e^{-2\tau}, \Delta n_{\rm s}, \Delta \omega_{\rm m}, \Delta \omega_{\rm b},
\Delta \theta_*\} = \{-1.7, -2.2, 1.2, -2.0, 1.1, 0.9\}$, with a $\chi^2$ value
of 8.0. We find that this $\chi^2$ value is exceeded in 15% of our simulated
data sets, and that a parameter deviates by more than 2.2$\sigma$ in 9% of
simulated data sets, meaning that the shifts are not unusually large. Comparing
$\ell<800$ instead to $\ell>800$, or splitting at a different multipole, yields
similar results. We examine the $\ell<800$ model residuals in the $\ell>800$
power spectrum data and find that the features there... [abridged]
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.02743 [pdf] - 1494117
CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition
Abazajian, Kevork N.;
Adshead, Peter;
Ahmed, Zeeshan;
Allen, Steven W.;
Alonso, David;
Arnold, Kam S.;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Bartlett, James G.;
Battaglia, Nicholas;
Benson, Bradford A.;
Bischoff, Colin A.;
Borrill, Julian;
Buza, Victor;
Calabrese, Erminia;
Caldwell, Robert;
Carlstrom, John E.;
Chang, Clarence L.;
Crawford, Thomas M.;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
De Bernardis, Francesco;
de Haan, Tijmen;
Alighieri, Sperello di Serego;
Dunkley, Joanna;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Errard, Josquin;
Fabbian, Giulio;
Feeney, Stephen;
Ferraro, Simone;
Filippini, Jeffrey P.;
Flauger, Raphael;
Fuller, George M.;
Gluscevic, Vera;
Green, Daniel;
Grin, Daniel;
Grohs, Evan;
Henning, Jason W.;
Hill, J. Colin;
Hlozek, Renee;
Holder, Gilbert;
Holzapfel, William;
Hu, Wayne;
Huffenberger, Kevin M.;
Keskitalo, Reijo;
Knox, Lloyd;
Kosowsky, Arthur;
Kovac, John;
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Kuo, Chao-Lin;
Kusaka, Akito;
Jeune, Maude Le;
Lee, Adrian T.;
Lilley, Marc;
Loverde, Marilena;
Madhavacheril, Mathew S.;
Mantz, Adam;
Marsh, David J. E.;
McMahon, Jeffrey;
Meerburg, Pieter Daniel;
Meyers, Joel;
Miller, Amber D.;
Munoz, Julian B.;
Nguyen, Ho Nam;
Niemack, Michael D.;
Peloso, Marco;
Peloton, Julien;
Pogosian, Levon;
Pryke, Clement;
Raveri, Marco;
Reichardt, Christian L.;
Rocha, Graca;
Rotti, Aditya;
Schaan, Emmanuel;
Schmittfull, Marcel M.;
Scott, Douglas;
Sehgal, Neelima;
Shandera, Sarah;
Sherwin, Blake D.;
Smith, Tristan L.;
Sorbo, Lorenzo;
Starkman, Glenn D.;
Story, Kyle T.;
van Engelen, Alexander;
Vieira, Joaquin D.;
Watson, Scott;
Whitehorn, Nathan;
Wu, W. L. Kimmy
Submitted: 2016-10-09
This book lays out the scientific goals to be addressed by the
next-generation ground-based cosmic microwave background experiment, CMB-S4,
envisioned to consist of dedicated telescopes at the South Pole, the high
Chilean Atacama plateau and possibly a northern hemisphere site, all equipped
with new superconducting cameras. CMB-S4 will dramatically advance cosmological
studies by crossing critical thresholds in the search for the B-mode
polarization signature of primordial gravitational waves, in the determination
of the number and masses of the neutrinos, in the search for evidence of new
light relics, in constraining the nature of dark energy, and in testing general
relativity on large scales.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.09387 [pdf] - 1530762
Planck intermediate results. XLVIII. Disentangling Galactic dust
emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-30, last modified: 2016-08-09
Using the Planck 2015 data release (PR2) temperature maps, we separate
Galactic thermal dust emission from cosmic infrared background (CIB)
anisotropies. For this purpose, we implement a specifically tailored
component-separation method, the so-called generalized needlet internal linear
combination (GNILC) method, which uses spatial information (the angular power
spectra) to disentangle the Galactic dust emission and CIB anisotropies. We
produce significantly improved all-sky maps of Planck thermal dust emission,
with reduced CIB contamination, at 353, 545, and 857 GHz. By reducing the CIB
contamination of the thermal dust maps, we provide more accurate estimates of
the local dust temperature and dust spectral index over the sky with reduced
dispersion, especially at high Galactic latitudes above $b = \pm 20{\deg}$. We
find that the dust temperature is $T = (19.4 \pm 1.3)$ K and the dust spectral
index is $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.1$ averaged over the whole sky, while $T = (19.4
\pm 1.5)$ K and $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.2$ on 21 % of the sky at high latitudes.
Moreover, subtracting the new CIB-removed thermal dust maps from the
CMB-removed Planck maps gives access to the CIB anisotropies over 60 % of the
sky at Galactic latitudes $|b| > 20{\deg}$. Because they are a significant
improvement over previous Planck products, the GNILC maps are recommended for
thermal dust science. The new CIB maps can be regarded as indirect tracers of
the dark matter and they are recommended for exploring cross-correlations with
lensing and large-scale structure optical surveys. The reconstructed GNILC
thermal dust and CIB maps are delivered as Planck products.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.02704 [pdf] - 1483210
Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness
of parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giard, M.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Mottet, S.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Serra, P.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-07-09, last modified: 2016-06-30
This paper presents the Planck 2015 likelihoods, statistical descriptions of
the 2-point correlations of CMB data, using the hybrid approach employed
previously: pixel-based at $\ell<30$ and a Gaussian approximation to the
distribution of spectra at higher $\ell$. The main improvements are the use of
more and better processed data and of Planck polarization data, and more
detailed foreground and instrumental models, allowing further checks and
enhanced immunity to systematics. Progress in foreground modelling enables a
larger sky fraction. Improvements in processing and instrumental models further
reduce uncertainties. For temperature, we perform an analysis of end-to-end
instrumental simulations fed into the data processing pipeline; this does not
reveal biases from residual instrumental systematics. The $\Lambda$CDM
cosmological model continues to offer a very good fit to Planck data. The slope
of primordial scalar fluctuations, $n_s$, is confirmed smaller than unity at
more than 5{\sigma} from Planck alone. We further validate robustness against
specific extensions to the baseline cosmology. E.g., the effective number of
neutrino species remains compatible with the canonical value of 3.046. This
first detailed analysis of Planck polarization concentrates on E modes. At low
$\ell$ we use temperature at all frequencies and a subset of polarization. The
frequency range improves CMB-foreground separation. Within the baseline model
this requires a reionization optical depth $\tau=0.078\pm0.019$, significantly
lower than without high-frequency data for explicit dust monitoring. At high
$\ell$ we detect residual errors in E, typically O($\mu$K$^2$); we recommend
temperature alone as the high-$\ell$ baseline. Nevertheless, Planck high-$\ell$
polarization allows a separate determination of $\Lambda$CDM parameters
consistent with those from temperature alone.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.03375 [pdf] - 1262591
Planck 2013 results. XXXI. Consistency of the Planck data
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Herranz, C. D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leon-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Scott, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-08-13
The Planck design and scanning strategy provide many levels of redundancy
that can be exploited to provide tests of internal consistency. One of the most
important is the comparison of the 70GHz and 100GHz channels. Based on
different instrument technologies, with feeds located differently in the focal
plane, analysed independently by different teams using different software, and
near the minimum of diffuse foreground emission, these channels are in effect
two different experiments. The 143GHz channel has the lowest noise level on
Planck, and is near the minimum of unresolved foreground emission. In this
paper, we analyse the level of consistency achieved in the 2013 Planck data. We
concentrate on comparisons between the 70/100/143GHz channel maps and power
spectra, particularly over the angular scales of the first and second acoustic
peaks, on maps masked for diffuse Galactic emission and for strong unresolved
sources. Difference maps covering angular scales from 8deg-15arcmin are
consistent with noise, and show no evidence of cosmic microwave background
structure. Including small but important corrections for unresolved-source
residuals, we demonstrate agreement between 70 and 100GHz power spectra
averaged over 70<l<390 at the 0.8% level, and agreement between 143 and 100GHz
power spectra of 0.4% over the same l range. These values are within and
consistent with the overall uncertainties in calibration given in the Planck
2013 results. We also present results based on the 2013 likelihood analysis
showing consistency at the 0.35% between the 100/143/217GHz power spectra. We
analyse calibration procedures and beams to determine what fraction of these
differences can be accounted for by known approximations or systematic errors
that could be controlled even better in the future, reducing uncertainties
still further. Several possible small improvements are described...(abridged)
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.06578 [pdf] - 1342735
Bouncing alternatives to inflation
Submitted: 2015-03-23
Although the inflationary paradigm is the most widely accepted explanation
for the current cosmological observations, it does not necessarily correspond
to what actually happened in the early stages of our Universe. To decide on
this issue, two paths can be followed: first, all the possible predictions it
makes must be derived thoroughly and compared with available data, and second,
all imaginable alternatives must be ruled out. Leaving the first task to all
other contributors of this volume, we concentrate here on the second option,
focusing on the bouncing alternatives and their consequences.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.4119 [pdf] - 1214986
Non-Gaussianity excess problem in classical bouncing cosmologies
Submitted: 2014-06-16, last modified: 2015-01-13
The simplest possible classical model leading to a cosmological bounce is
examined in the light of the non-Gaussianities it can generate. Concentrating
solely on the transition between contraction and expansion, and assuming
initially purely Gaussian perturbations at the end of the contracting phase, we
find that the bounce acts as a source such that the resulting value for the
post-bounce $f_{\mathrm{NL}}$ may largely exceed all current limits, to the
point of potentially casting doubts on the validity of the perturbative
expansion. We conjecture that if one can assume that the non-Gaussianity
production depends only on the bouncing behavior of the scale factor and not on
the specifics of the model examined, then many realistic models in which a
nonsingular classical bounce takes place could exhibit a generic
non-Gaussianity excess problem that would need to be addressed for each case.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.7958 [pdf] - 1208717
Production of non-gaussianities in a bouncing phase
Submitted: 2014-03-31, last modified: 2014-07-08
We compute the level of non-gaussianities produced by a cosmological bouncing
phase in the minimal non-singular setup that lies within the context of General
Relativity when the matter content consists of a simple scalar field with a
standard kinetic term. Such a bouncing phase is obtained by requiring that the
spatial sections of the background spacetime be positively curved. We restrict
attention to the close vicinity of the bounce by Taylor expanding the scale
factor, the scalar field and its potential in powers of the conformal time
around the bounce. We find that possibly large non-gaussianities are
generically produced at the bounce itself and also discuss which shapes of
non-gaussianities are mostly likely to be produced.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.3494 [pdf] - 1053439
Observational signatures of a non-singular bouncing cosmology
Submitted: 2011-04-18, last modified: 2011-06-07
We study a cosmological scenario in which inflation is preceded by a bounce.
In this scenario, the primordial singularity, one of the major shortcomings of
inflation, is replaced by a non-singular bounce, prior to which the universe
undergoes a phase of contraction. Our starting point is the bouncing cosmology
investigated in Falciano et al. (2008), which we complete by a detailed study
of the transfer of cosmological perturbations through the bounce and a
discussion of possible observational effects of bouncing cosmologies. We focus
on a symmetric bounce and compute the evolution of cosmological perturbations
during the contracting, bouncing and inflationary phases. We derive an
expression for the Mukhanov-Sasaki perturbation variable at the onset of the
inflationary phase that follows the bounce. Rather than being in the
Bunch-Davies vacuum, it is found to be in an excited state that depends on the
time scale of the bounce. We then show that this induces oscillations
superimposed on the nearly scale-invariant primordial spectra for scalar and
tensor perturbations. We discuss the effects of these oscillations in the
cosmic microwave background and in the matter power spectrum. We propose a new
way to indirectly measure the spatial curvature energy density parameter in the
context of this model.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.4601 [pdf] - 903015
Nonabelian Bosonic Currents in Cosmic Strings
Submitted: 2010-03-24
A nonabelian generalization of the neutral Witten current-carrying string
model is discussed in which the bosonic current-carrier belongs to a two
dimensional representation of SU(2). We find that the current-carrying
solutions can be of three different kinds: either the current spans a U(1)
subgroup, and in which case one is left with an abelian current-carrying
string, or the three currents are all lightlike, travelling in the same
direction (only left or right movers). The third, genuinely nonabelian
situation, cannot be handled within a cylindrically symmetric framework, but
can be shown to depend on all possible string Lorentz invariant quantities that
can be constructed out of the phase gradients.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.4328 [pdf] - 22733
Coupled currents in cosmic strings
Submitted: 2009-03-25
We first examine the microstructure of a cosmic string endowed with two
simple Abelian currents. This microstructure depends on two state parameters.
We then provide the macroscopic description of such a string and show that it
depends on an additional Lorentz-invariant state parameter that relates the two
currents. We find that in most of the parameter space, the two-current string
is essentially equivalent to the single current-carrying string, i.e., only one
field condenses onto the defect. In the regions where two currents are present,
we find that as far as stability is concerned, one can approximate the dynamics
with good accuracy using an analytic model based on either a logarithmic (on
the electric side, i.e., for timelike currents) or a rational (on the magnetic
side, i.e., for spacelike currents) worldsheet Lagrangian.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.4169 [pdf] - 10517
String theory, gravity and experiment
Submitted: 2008-02-28
The aim of these lectures is to give an introduction to several topics which
lie at the intersection of string theory, gravity theory and gravity
phenomenology. One successively reviews: (i) the "membrane" approach to the
dissipative dynamics of classical black holes, (ii) the current experimental
tests of gravity, and their theoretical interpretation, (iii) some aspects of
the string-inspired phenomenology of the gravitational sector, and (iv) some
possibilities for observing string-related signals in cosmology (including a
discussion of gravitational wave signals from cosmic superstrings).
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510203 [pdf] - 76699
The gravitational wave "probability event horizon" for double neutron
star mergers
Submitted: 2005-10-07
Gravitational waves generated by the final merger of double neutron star
(DNS) binary systems are a key target for the gravitational wave (GW)
interferometric detectors, such as LIGO, and the next generation detectors,
Advanced LIGO. The cumulative GW signal from DNS mergers in interferometric
data will manifest as "geometrical noise": a non-continuous stochastic
background with a unique statistical signature dominated by the spatial and
temporal distribution of the sources. Because geometrical noise is highly
non-Gaussian, it could potentially be used to identify the presence of a
stochastic GW background from DNS mergers. We demonstrate this by fitting to a
simulated distribution of transients using a model for the DNS merger rate and
idealized Gaussian detector noise. Using the cosmological "probability event
horizon" concept and recent bounds for the Galactic DNS merger rate, we
calculate the evolution of the detectability of DNS mergers with observation
time. For Advanced LIGO sensitivities and a detection threshold assuming
optimal filtering, there is a 95% probability that a minimum of one DNS merger
signal will be detectable from the ensemble of events comprising the stochastic
background during 12-211 days of observation. For initial LIGO sensitivities,
we identify an interesting regime where there is a 95% probability that at
least one DNS merger with signal-to-noise ratio > unity will occur during 4-68
days of observation. We propose that there exists an intermediate detection
regime with pre-filtered signal-noise-ratio less than unity, where the DNS
merger rate is high enough that the geometrical signature could be identified
in interferometer data.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0104486 [pdf] - 42225
The Location of CMB Peaks in a Universe with Dark Energy
Submitted: 2001-04-30, last modified: 2002-05-21
The locations of the peaks of the CMB spectrum are sensitive indicators of
cosmological parameters, yet there is no known analytic formula which
accurately describes their dependence on them. We parametrize the location of
the peaks as l_m = l_A(m - \phi_m), where l_A is the analytically calculable
acoustic scale and m labels the peak number. Fitting formulae for the phase
shifts \phi_m for the first three peaks and the first trough are given. It is
shown that in a wide range of parameter space, the acoustic scale l_A can be
retrieved from actual CMB measurements of the first three peaks within one
percent accuracy. This can be used to speed up likelihood analysis. We describe
how the peak shifts can be used to distinguish between different models of dark
energy.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0105457 [pdf] - 42686
Constraining Quintessence with the New CMB Data
Submitted: 2001-05-25, last modified: 2002-03-15
The CMB data recently released by BOOMERANG and MAXIMA suggest that the
anisotropy spectrum has a third peak in the range 800<l_3<900. A combination of
this result with constraints from large-scale structure permit us to
differentiate between different quintessence models. In particular, we find
that inverse power law models with power \alpha >1 are disfavoured. Models with
more than 5% quintessence before last scattering require a spectral index
greater than 1. These constraints are compared with supernovae observations. We
also show that the CMB alone now provides strong evidence for an accelerating
universe.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0105306 [pdf] - 42535
The Influence of Quintessence on the Separation of CMB Peaks
Submitted: 2001-05-17
A hypothetical dark energy component may have an equation of state that is
different from a cosmological constant and possibly even changing in time. The
spacing of the cosmic microwave background peaks is sensitive to the ratio of
the horizon sizes today and at last scattering and therefore to the details of
the cosmological evolution. Together with independent measurements of today's
cosmological parameters, this restricts quintessence models in the epoch before
and during decoupling. For fixed \Omega^b_0, \Omega^{cdm}_0 and h, we give an
analytic estimate of the spacing that depends on \Omega^{\phi}_{ls},
\Omega^{\phi}_0 and an effective equation of state of the dark energy
component.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0012139 [pdf] - 39728
Quintessence and the Separation of CMB Peaks
Submitted: 2000-12-06, last modified: 2001-04-25
We propose that it should be possible to use the CMB to discriminate between
dark energy models with different equations of state, including distinguishing
a cosmological constant from many models of quintessence. The separation of
peaks in the CMB anisotropies can be parametrised by three quantities: the
amount of quintessence today, the amount at last scattering, and the averaged
equation of state of quintessence. In particular, we show that the CMB peaks
can be used to measure the amount of dark energy present before last
scattering.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/9908398 [pdf] - 116552
Cosmological Consequences of Slow-Moving Bubbles in First-Order Phase
Transitions
Submitted: 1999-08-18, last modified: 1999-10-28
In cosmological first-order phase transitions, the progress of true-vacuum
bubbles is expected to be significantly retarded by the interaction between the
bubble wall and the hot plasma. We examine the evolution and collision of
slow-moving true-vacuum bubbles. Our lattice simulations indicate that phase
oscillations, predicted and observed in systems with a local symmetry and with
a global symmetry where the bubbles move at speeds less than the speed of
light, do not occur inside collisions of slow-moving local-symmetry bubbles. We
observe almost instantaneous phase equilibration which would lead to a decrease
in the expected initial defect density, or possibly prevent defects from
forming at all. We illustrate our findings with an example of defect formation
suppressed in slow-moving bubbles. Slow-moving bubble walls also prevent the
formation of `extra defects', and in the presence of plasma conductivity may
lead to an increase in the magnitude of any primordial magnetic field formed.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9904022 [pdf] - 105919
Relaxing the Bounds on Primordial Magnetic Seed Fields
Submitted: 1999-04-01
We point out that the lower bound on the primordial magnetic field required
to seed the galactic dynamo is significantly relaxed in an open universe or in
a universe with a positive cosmological constant. It is shown that, for
reasonable cosmological parameters, primordial seed fields of strength 10^{-30}
Gauss or less at the time of galaxy formation could explain observed galactic
magnetic fields. As a consequence, mechanisms of primordial magnetic seed-field
generation that have previously been ruled out could well be viable. We also
comment on the implications of the observation of micro-Gauss magnetic fields
in galaxies at high redshift.