Normalized to: Asorey, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.01407 [pdf] - 2105840
HIR4: Cosmological signatures imprinted on the cross correlation between
21cm map and galaxy clustering
Submitted: 2020-06-02
We explore the cosmological multi-tracer synergies between a DESI-like
Emission Line Galaxy (ELG) distribution and a Tianlai-like 21cm intensity map.
We use simulated maps generated from a particle simulation in the light-cone
volume (Horizon Run 4), sky-trimmed and including the effects of foreground
contamination, its removal, and instrument noise. We first validate how the
foreground residual affects the recovered 21cm signal by putting different
levels of foreground contamination into the 21cm maps. We find that the
contamination cannot be ignored in the angular auto-power spectra of HI even
when it is small, but has no influence on the accuracy of the angular
cross-power spectra between HI and galaxies. In the foreground-cleaned map
case, as information is lost in the cleaning procedure, there is also a bias in
the cross-power spectrum. However, we found that the bias from the cross-power
spectrum is scale-independent, which is easily parameterised as part of the
model, while the offset in the HI auto-power spectrum is non-linear. In
particular, we tested that the cross power also benefits from the cancellation
of the bias in the power spectrum measurement that is induced by the instrument
noise, which changes the shape of the auto-power spectra but leaves the
cross-power unaffected. We then modelled the angular cross-power spectra to fit
the BAO feature in broadband shape of the angular cross power spectrum,
including contamination from the residual foreground and the effect of
instrument noise. We forecast a constraint on the angular diameter distance
$D_\mathrm{A}$ for the Tianlai Pathfinder redshift $0.775<z<1.03$, giving a
distance measurement with a precision of 3.3% at that redshift.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.00449 [pdf] - 2110125
OzDES multi-object fibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey:
Results and second data release
Lidman, C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Davis, T. M.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Asorey, J.;
Bolejko, K.;
Brout, D.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Carr, A.;
Childress, M.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lagattuta, D.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Macaulay, E.;
Malik, U.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Möller, A.;
Mudd, D.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Panther, F.;
Parkinson, D.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Sako, M.;
Swann, E.;
Scalzo, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Webb, S.;
Wiseman, P.;
Yu, Z.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-05-31
We present a description of the Australian Dark Energy Survey (OzDES) and
summarise the results from its six years of operations. Using the 2dF fibre
positioner and AAOmega spectrograph on the 3.9-metre Anglo-Australian
Telescope, OzDES has monitored 771 AGN, classified hundreds of supernovae, and
obtained redshifts for thousands of galaxies that hosted a transient within the
10 deep fields of the Dark Energy Survey. We also present the second OzDES data
release, containing the redshifts of almost 30,000 sources, some as faint as
$r_{\mathrm AB}=24$ mag, and 375,000 individual spectra. These data, in
combination with the time-series photometry from the Dark Energy Survey, will
be used to measure the expansion history of the Universe out to $z\sim1.2$ and
the masses of hundreds of black holes out to $z\sim4$. OzDES is a template for
future surveys that combine simultaneous monitoring of targets with wide-field
imaging cameras and wide-field multi-object spectrographs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.12218 [pdf] - 2084339
First Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous
supernova
Inserra, C.;
Sullivan, M.;
Angus, C. R.;
Macaulay, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Frohmaier, C.;
Gutiérrez, C. P.;
Möller, A.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, P. J.;
Davis, T. M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Galbany, L.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Thomas, B. P.;
Wiseman, P.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Malagón, A. A. Plazas;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.;
Asorey, J.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Sharp, R.;
Swann, E.;
Tucker, B. E.
Submitted: 2020-04-25
We present the first Hubble diagram of superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) out
to a redshift of two, together with constraints on the matter density,
$\Omega_{\rm M}$, and the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, $w(\equiv
p/\rho)$. We build a sample of 20 cosmologically useful SLSNe~I based on light
curve and spectroscopy quality cuts. We confirm the robustness of the peak
decline SLSN~I standardization relation with a larger dataset and improved
fitting techniques than previous works. We then solve the SLSN model based on
the above standardisation via minimisation of the $\chi^2$ computed from a
covariance matrix which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. For
a spatially flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, we find $\Omega_{\rm
M}=0.44^{+0.21}_{-0.21}$, with a rms of 0.28 mag for the residuals of the
distance moduli. For an $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological model, the addition of SLSNe~I
to a `baseline' measurement consisting of Planck temperature and WMAP
polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) fluctuation together with
type Ia supernovae, results in a small improvement in the constraints of $w_0$
and $w_a$ of 4\%. We present simulations of future surveys with 847 SLSNe I and
show that such a sample can deliver cosmological constraints in a flat
$\Lambda$CDM model with the same precision (considering only statistical
uncertainties) as current surveys that use type Ia supernovae, while providing
an improvement of 15\% in the constraints on the time variation of dark energy,
$w_0$ and $w_a$. This paper represents the proof-of-concept for superluminous
supernova cosmology, and demonstrates they can provide an independent test of
cosmology in the high-redshift ($z>1$) universe.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10454 [pdf] - 2129267
The impact of spectroscopic incompleteness in direct calibration of
redshift distributions for weak lensing surveys
Hartley, W. G.;
Chang, C.;
Samani, S.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Davis, T. M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Asorey, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Kuehn, K.;
King, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
DeRose, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchon, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-03-23
Obtaining accurate distributions of galaxy redshifts is a critical aspect of
weak lensing cosmology experiments. One of the methods used to estimate and
validate redshift distributions is apply weights to a spectroscopic sample so
that their weighted photometry distribution matches the target sample. In this
work we estimate the \textit{selection bias} in redshift that is introduced in
this procedure. We do so by simulating the process of assembling a
spectroscopic sample (including observer-assigned confidence flags) and
highlight the impacts of spectroscopic target selection and redshift failures.
We use the first year (Y1) weak lensing analysis in DES as an example data set
but the implications generalise to all similar weak lensing surveys. We find
that using colour cuts that are not available to the weak lensing galaxies can
introduce biases of $\Delta~z\sim0.015$ in the weighted mean redshift of
different redshift intervals. To assess the impact of incompleteness in
spectroscopic samples, we select only objects with high observer-defined
confidence flags and compare the weighted mean redshift with the true mean. We
find that the mean redshift of the DES Y1 weak lensing sample is typically
biased at the $\Delta~z=0.005-0.05$ level after the weighting is applied. The
bias we uncover can have either sign, depending on the samples and redshift
interval considered. For the highest redshift bin, the bias is larger than the
uncertainties in the other DES Y1 redshift calibration methods, justifying the
decision of not using this method for the redshift estimations. We discuss
several methods to mitigate this bias.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.03638 [pdf] - 2047971
Quasar Accretion Disk Sizes from Continuum Reverberation Mapping in the
DES Standard Star Fields
Yu, Zhefu;
Martini, Paul;
Davis, T. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kochanek, C. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Mudd, D.;
Peterson, B. M.;
Wester, W.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Lima, M.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Möller, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2018-11-08, last modified: 2020-02-12
Measurements of the physical properties of accretion disks in active galactic
nuclei are important for better understanding the growth and evolution of
supermassive black holes. We present the accretion disk sizes of 22 quasars
from continuum reverberation mapping with data from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) standard star fields and the supernova C fields. We construct continuum
lightcurves with the \textit{griz} photometry that span five seasons of DES
observations. These data sample the time variability of the quasars with a
cadence as short as one day, which corresponds to a rest frame cadence that is
a factor of a few higher than most previous work. We derive time lags between
bands with both JAVELIN and the interpolated cross-correlation function method,
and fit for accretion disk sizes using the JAVELIN Thin Disk model. These new
measurements include disks around black holes with masses as small as
$\sim10^7$ $M_{\odot}$, which have equivalent sizes at 2500\AA \, as small as
$\sim 0.1$ light days in the rest frame. We find that most objects have
accretion disk sizes consistent with the prediction of the standard thin disk
model when we take disk variability into account. We have also simulated the
expected yield of accretion disk measurements under various observational
scenarios for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Deep Drilling Fields. We find
that the number of disk measurements would increase significantly if the
default cadence is changed from three days to two days or one day.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.00833 [pdf] - 2093158
HIR4: cosmology from a simulated neutral hydrogen full sky using Horizon
Run 4
Submitted: 2020-01-03
The distribution of cosmological neutral hydrogen will provide a new window
into the large-scale structure of the Universe with the next generation of
radio telescopes and surveys. The observation of this material, through 21cm
line emission, will be confused by foreground emission in the same frequencies.
Even after these foregrounds are removed, the reconstructed map may not exactly
match the original cosmological signal, which will introduce systematic errors
and offset into the measured correlations. In this paper, we simulate future
surveys of neutral hydrogen using the Horizon Run 4 (HR4) cosmological N-body
simulation. We generate HI intensity maps from the HR4 halo catalogue, and
combine with foreground radio emission maps from the Global Sky Model, to
create accurate simulations over the entire sky. We simulate the HI sky for the
frequency range 700-800 MHz, matching the sensitivity of the Tianlai
pathfinder. We test the accuracy of the fastICA, PCA and log-polynomial fitting
foreground removal methods to recover the input cosmological angular power
spectrum and measure the parameters. We show the effect of survey noise levels
and beam sizes on the recovered the cosmological constraints. We find that
while the reconstruction removes power from the cosmological 21cm distribution
on large-scales, we can correct for this and recover the input parameters in
the noise-free case. However, the effect of noise and beam size of the Tianlai
pathfinder prevents accurate recovery of the cosmological parameters when using
only intensity mapping information.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.04071 [pdf] - 1904098
Superluminous Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey
Angus, C. R.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Inserra, C.;
Wiseman, P.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Thomas, B. P.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Galbany, L.;
Childress, M.;
Asorey, J.;
Brown, P. J.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Curtin, C.;
Frohmaier, C.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, C.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Nugent, P.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Sako, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.
Submitted: 2018-12-10, last modified: 2019-06-21
We present a sample of 21 hydrogen-free superluminous supernovae (SLSNe-I),
and one hydrogen-rich SLSN (SLSN-II) detected during the five-year Dark Energy
Survey (DES). These SNe, located in the redshift range 0.220<z<1.998, represent
the largest homogeneously-selected sample of SLSN events at high redshift. We
present the observed g,r, i, z light curves for these SNe, which we interpolate
using Gaussian Processes. The resulting light curves are analysed to determine
the luminosity function of SLSN-I, and their evolutionary timescales. The DES
SLSN-I sample significantly broadens the distribution of SLSN-I light curve
properties when combined with existing samples from the literature. We fit a
magnetar model to our SLSNe, and find that this model alone is unable to
replicate the behaviour of many of the bolometric light curves. We search the
DES SLSN-I light curves for the presence of initial peaks prior to the main
light-curve peak. Using a shock breakout model, our Monte Carlo search finds
that 3 of our 14 events with pre-max data display such initial peaks. However,
10 events show no evidence for such peaks, in some cases down to an absolute
magnitude of <-16, suggesting that such features are not ubiquitous to all
SLSN-I events. We also identify a red pre-peak feature within the light curve
of one SLSN, which is comparable to that observed within SN2018bsz.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02377 [pdf] - 1893288
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy
Survey: Analysis, Systematic Uncertainties, and Validation
Brout, D.;
Scolnic, D.;
Kessler, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, T. M.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lasker, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Zhang, B.;
Andersen, P.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Brown, P.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Miranda, V.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Wester, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-06-01
We present the analysis underpinning the measurement of cosmological
parameters from 207 spectroscopically classified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia)
from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN), spanning a redshift range of 0.017<$z$<0.849. We combine the DES-SN
sample with an external sample of 122 low-redshift ($z$<0.1) SNe Ia, resulting
in a "DES-SN3YR" sample of 329 SNe Ia. Our cosmological analyses are blinded:
after combining our DES-SN3YR distances with constraints from the Cosmic
Microwave Background (CMB; Planck Collaboration 2016), our uncertainties in the
measurement of the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, $w$, are .042
(stat) and .059 (stat+syst) at 68% confidence. We provide a detailed systematic
uncertainty budget, which has nearly equal contributions from photometric
calibration, astrophysical bias corrections, and instrumental bias corrections.
We also include several new sources of systematic uncertainty. While our sample
is <1/3 the size of the Pantheon sample, our constraints on $w$ are only larger
by 1.4$\times$, showing the impact of the DES SN Ia light curve quality. We
find that the traditional stretch and color standardization parameters of the
DES SNe Ia are in agreement with earlier SN Ia samples such as Pan-STARRS1 and
the Supernova Legacy Survey. However, we find smaller intrinsic scatter about
the Hubble diagram (0.077 mag). Interestingly, we find no evidence for a Hubble
residual step ( 0.007 $\pm$ 0.018 mag) as a function of host galaxy mass for
the DES subset, in 2.4$\sigma$ tension with previous measurements. We also
present novel validation methods of our sample using simulated SNe Ia inserted
in DECam images and using large catalog-level simulations to test for biases in
our analysis pipelines.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.04206 [pdf] - 1897930
CIV Black Hole Mass Measurements with the Australian Dark Energy Survey
(OzDES)
Hoormann, J. K.;
Martini, P.;
Davis, T. M.;
King, A.;
Lidman, C.;
Mudd, D.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Yu, Z.;
Allam, S.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Childress, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Lima, M.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Möller, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, . S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Collaboration, DES
Submitted: 2019-02-11, last modified: 2019-05-30
Black hole mass measurements outside the local universe are critically
important to derive the growth of supermassive black holes over cosmic time,
and to study the interplay between black hole growth and galaxy evolution. In
this paper we present two measurements of supermassive black hole masses from
reverberation mapping (RM) of the broad CIV emission line. These measurements
are based on multi-year photometry and spectroscopy from the Dark Energy Survey
Supernova Program (DES-SN) and the Australian Dark Energy Survey (OzDES), which
together constitute the OzDES RM Program. The observed reverberation lag
between the DES continuum photometry and the OzDES emission-line fluxes is
measured to be $358^{+126}_{-123}$ and $343^{+58}_{-84}$ days for two quasars
at redshifts of $1.905$ and $2.593$ respectively. The corresponding masses of
the two supermassive black holes are $4.4 \times 10^{9}$ and $3.3 \times
10^{9}$ M$_\odot$, which are among the highest-redshift and highest-mass black
holes measured to date with RM studies. We use these new measurements to better
determine the CIV radius$-$luminosity relationship for high-luminosity quasars,
which is fundamental to many quasar black hole mass estimates and demographic
studies.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02376 [pdf] - 1890287
First Cosmological Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy
Survey: Measurement of the Hubble Constant
Macaulay, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Bacon, D.;
Brout, D.;
Davis, T. M.;
Zhang, B.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Scolnic, D.;
Möller, A.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lasker, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Brown, P.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Collett, T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Glazebrook, K.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Nugent, P.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wiseman, P.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-27
We present an improved measurement of the Hubble constant (H_0) using the
'inverse distance ladder' method, which adds the information from 207 Type Ia
supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) at redshift 0.018 < z <
0.85 to existing distance measurements of 122 low redshift (z < 0.07) SNe Ia
(Low-z) and measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs). Whereas
traditional measurements of H_0 with SNe Ia use a distance ladder of parallax
and Cepheid variable stars, the inverse distance ladder relies on absolute
distance measurements from the BAOs to calibrate the intrinsic magnitude of the
SNe Ia. We find H_0 = 67.8 +/- 1.3 km s-1 Mpc-1 (statistical and systematic
uncertainties, 68% confidence). Our measurement makes minimal assumptions about
the underlying cosmological model, and our analysis was blinded to reduce
confirmation bias. We examine possible systematic uncertainties and all are
below the statistical uncertainties. Our H_0 value is consistent with estimates
derived from the Cosmic Microwave Background assuming a LCDM universe (Planck
Collaboration et al. 2018).
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02374 [pdf] - 1880991
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy
Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Angus, C.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, P.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kovacs, E.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Spinka, H.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swann, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wiseman, P.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-10
We present the first cosmological parameter constraints using measurements of
type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN). The analysis uses a subsample of 207 spectroscopically confirmed SNe
Ia from the first three years of DES-SN, combined with a low-redshift sample of
122 SNe from the literature. Our "DES-SN3YR" result from these 329 SNe Ia is
based on a series of companion analyses and improvements covering SN Ia
discovery, spectroscopic selection, photometry, calibration, distance bias
corrections, and evaluation of systematic uncertainties. For a flat LCDM model
we find a matter density Omega_m = 0.331 +_ 0.038. For a flat wCDM model, and
combining our SN Ia constraints with those from the cosmic microwave background
(CMB), we find a dark energy equation of state w = -0.978 +_ 0.059, and Omega_m
= 0.321 +_ 0.018. For a flat w0waCDM model, and combining probes from SN Ia,
CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations, we find w0 = -0.885 +_ 0.114 and wa =
-0.387 +_ 0.430. These results are in agreement with a cosmological constant
and with previous constraints using SNe Ia (Pantheon, JLA).
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02379 [pdf] - 1880992
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernova from the Dark Energy
Survey: Simulations to Correct Supernova Distance Biases
Kessler, R.;
Brout, D.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, T. M.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lasker, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Zhang, B.;
Andersen, P.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crawford, S.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-09
We describe catalog-level simulations of Type Ia supernova (SN~Ia) light
curves in the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN), and in
low-redshift samples from the Center for Astrophysics (CfA) and the Carnegie
Supernova Project (CSP). These simulations are used to model biases from
selection effects and light curve analysis, and to determine bias corrections
for SN~Ia distance moduli that are used to measure cosmological parameters. To
generate realistic light curves, the simulation uses a detailed SN~Ia model,
incorporates information from observations (PSF, sky noise, zero point), and
uses summary information (e.g., detection efficiency vs. signal to noise ratio)
based on 10,000 fake SN light curves whose fluxes were overlaid on images and
processed with our analysis pipelines. The quality of the simulation is
illustrated by predicting distributions observed in the data. Averaging within
redshift bins, we find distance modulus biases up to 0.05~mag over the redshift
ranges of the low-z and DES-SN samples. For individual events, particularly
those with extreme red or blue color, distance biases can reach 0.4~mag.
Therefore, accurately determining bias corrections is critical for precision
measurements of cosmological parameters. Files used to make these corrections
are available at https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/sn.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09208 [pdf] - 1854198
Inflation and Dark Energy from spectroscopy at $z > 2$
Ferraro, Simone;
Wilson, Michael J.;
Abidi, Muntazir;
Alonso, David;
Ansarinejad, Behzad;
Armstrong, Robert;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Avelino, Arturo;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Bandura, Kevin;
Battaglia, Nicholas;
Bavdhankar, Chetan;
Bernal, José Luis;
Beutler, Florian;
Biagetti, Matteo;
Blanc, Guillermo A.;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Borrill, Julian;
Frye, Brenda;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Bull, Philip;
Burgess, Cliff;
Byrnes, Christian T.;
Cai, Zheng;
Castander, Francisco J;
Castorina, Emanuele;
Chang, Tzu-Ching;
Chaves-Montero, Jonás;
Chen, Shi-Fan;
Chen, Xingang;
Balland, Christophe;
Yèche, Christophe;
Cohn, J. D.;
Coulton, William;
Courtois, Helene;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
D'Amico, Guido;
Dawson, Kyle;
Delabrouille, Jacques;
Dey, Arjun;
Doré, Olivier;
Douglass, Kelly A.;
Yutong, Duan;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Eggemeier, Alexander;
Eisenstein, Daniel;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Font-Ribera, Andreu;
Foreman, Simon;
García-Bellido, Juan;
Gerbino, Martina;
Gluscevic, Vera;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
Green, Daniel;
Guy, Julien;
Hahn, ChangHoon;
Hanany, Shaul;
Handley, Will;
Hathi, Nimish;
Hawken, Adam J.;
Hernández-Aguayo, César;
Hložek, Renée;
Huterer, Dragan;
Ishak, Mustapha;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Karagiannis, Dionysios;
Keeley, Ryan E.;
Kehoe, Robert;
Khatri, Rishi;
Kim, Alex;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Kollmeier, Juna A.;
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Krolewski, Alex;
L'Huillier, Benjamin;
Landriau, Martin;
Levi, Michael;
Liguori, Michele;
Linder, Eric;
Lukić, Zarija;
de la Macorra, Axel;
Plazas, Andrés A.;
Marshall, Jennifer L.;
Martini, Paul;
Masui, Kiyoshi;
McDonald, Patrick;
Meerburg, P. Daniel;
Meyers, Joel;
Mirbabayi, Mehrdad;
Moustakas, John;
Myers, Adam D.;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Newburgh, Laura;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Niz, Gustavo;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Palunas, Povilas;
Percival, Will J.;
Piacentini, Francesco;
Pieri, Matthew M.;
Piro, Anthony L.;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Rhodes, Jason;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Rossi, Graziano;
Rudie, Gwen C.;
Samushia, Lado;
Sasaki, Misao;
Schaan, Emmanuel;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schmittfull, Marcel;
Schubnell, Michael;
Sehgal, Neelima;
Senatore, Leonardo;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Simon, Joshua D.;
Simon, Sara;
Slepian, Zachary;
Slosar, Anže;
Sridhar, Srivatsan;
Stebbins, Albert;
Escoffier, Stephanie;
Switzer, Eric R.;
Tarlé, Gregory;
Trodden, Mark;
Uhlemann, Cora;
Urenña-López, L. Arturo;
Di Valentino, Eleonora;
Vargas-Magaña, M.;
Wang, Yi;
Watson, Scott;
White, Martin;
Xu, Weishuang;
Yu, Byeonghee;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zheng, Yi;
Zhu, Hong-Ming
Submitted: 2019-03-21
The expansion of the Universe is understood to have accelerated during two
epochs: in its very first moments during a period of Inflation and much more
recently, at $z < 1$, when Dark Energy is hypothesized to drive cosmic
acceleration. The undiscovered mechanisms behind these two epochs represent
some of the most important open problems in fundamental physics. The large
cosmological volume at $2 < z < 5$, together with the ability to efficiently
target high-$z$ galaxies with known techniques, enables large gains in the
study of Inflation and Dark Energy. A future spectroscopic survey can test the
Gaussianity of the initial conditions up to a factor of ~50 better than our
current bounds, crossing the crucial theoretical threshold of
$\sigma(f_{NL}^{\rm local})$ of order unity that separates single field and
multi-field models. Simultaneously, it can measure the fraction of Dark Energy
at the percent level up to $z = 5$, thus serving as an unprecedented test of
the standard model and opening up a tremendous discovery space.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.05128 [pdf] - 1849255
The Next Generation of Cosmological Measurements with Type Ia Supernovae
Scolnic, Dan;
Perlmutter, Saul;
Aldering, Greg;
Brout, Dillon;
Davis, Tamara;
Filippenko, Alex;
Foley, Ryan;
Hlozek, Renee;
Hounsell, Rebekah;
Jha, Saurabh;
Jones, David;
Kelly, Pat;
Kessler, Rick;
Kim, Alex;
Rubin, David;
Riess, Adam;
Rodney, Steven;
Roberts-Pierel, Justin;
Stubbs, Christopher;
Wang, Yun;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Avelino, Arturo;
Bavdhankar, Chetan;
Brown, Peter J.;
Challinor, Anthony;
Balland, Christophe;
Cooray, Asantha;
Dhawan, Suhail;
Dimitriadis, Georgios;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Guy, Julien;
Handley, Will;
Keeley, Ryan E.;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
LHuillier, Benjamin;
Lattanzi, Massimiliano;
Mandel, Kaisey;
Mertens, James;
Rigault, Mickael;
Motloch, Pavel;
Mukherjee, Suvodip;
Narayan, Gautham;
Nomerotski, Andrei;
Page, Lyman;
Pogosian, Levon;
Puglisi, Giuseppe;
Raveri, Marco;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Rest, Armin;
Rojas-Bravo, Cesar;
Sako, Masao;
Shi, Feng;
Sridhar, Srivatsan;
Suzuki, Aritoki;
Tsai, Yu-Dai;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.;
Copin, Yannick;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zhu, Ningfeng
Submitted: 2019-03-12, last modified: 2019-03-14
While Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) are one of the most mature cosmological
probes, the next era promises to be extremely exciting in the number of
different ways SNe Ia are used to measure various cosmological parameters. Here
we review the experiments in the 2020s that will yield orders of magnitudes
more SNe Ia, and the new understandings and capabilities to constrain
systematic uncertainties at a level to match these statistics. We then discuss
five different cosmological probes with SNe Ia: the conventional Hubble diagram
for measuring dark energy properties, the distance ladder for measuring the
Hubble constant, peculiar velocities and weak lensing for measuring sigma8 and
strong-lens measurements of H0 and other cosmological parameters. For each of
these probes, we discuss the experiments that will provide the best
measurements and also the SN Ia-related systematics that affect each one.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04425 [pdf] - 1846071
Dark Matter Science in the Era of LSST
Bechtol, Keith;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Abazajian, Kevork N.;
Abidi, Muntazir;
Adhikari, Susmita;
Ali-Haïmoud, Yacine;
Annis, James;
Ansarinejad, Behzad;
Armstrong, Robert;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Banerjee, Arka;
Banik, Nilanjan;
Bennett, Charles;
Beutler, Florian;
Bird, Simeon;
Birrer, Simon;
Biswas, Rahul;
Biviano, Andrea;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Boddy, Kimberly K.;
Bonaca, Ana;
Borrill, Julian;
Bose, Sownak;
Bovy, Jo;
Frye, Brenda;
Brooks, Alyson M.;
Buckley, Matthew R.;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Bulbul, Esra;
Burchat, Patricia R.;
Burgess, Cliff;
Calore, Francesca;
Caputo, Regina;
Castorina, Emanuele;
Chang, Chihway;
Chapline, George;
Charles, Eric;
Chen, Xingang;
Clowe, Douglas;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Comparat, Johan;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cuoco, Alessandro;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
D'Amico, Guido;
Davis, Tamara M;
Dawson, William A.;
de la Macorra, Axel;
Di Valentino, Eleonora;
Rivero, Ana Díaz;
Digel, Seth;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doré, Olivier;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Eckner, Christopher;
Ellison, John;
Erkal, Denis;
Farahi, Arya;
Fassnacht, Christopher D.;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Foreman, Simon;
Friedrich, Oliver;
Frieman, Joshua;
García-Bellido, Juan;
Gawiser, Eric;
Gerbino, Martina;
Giannotti, Maurizio;
Gill, Mandeep S. S.;
Gluscevic, Vera;
Golovich, Nathan;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
González-Morales, Alma X.;
Grin, Daniel;
Gruen, Daniel;
Hearin, Andrew P.;
Hendel, David;
Hezaveh, Yashar D.;
Hirata, Christopher M.;
Hložek, Renee;
Horiuchi, Shunsaku;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jee, M. James;
Jeltema, Tesla E.;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Kaplinghat, Manoj;
Keeley, Ryan E.;
Keeton, Charles R.;
Khatri, Rishi;
Koposov, Sergey E.;
Koushiappas, Savvas M.;
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lam, Casey;
Lee, Chien-Hsiu;
Li, Ting S.;
Liguori, Michele;
Lin, Tongyan;
Lisanti, Mariangela;
LoVerde, Marilena;
Lu, Jessica R.;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Mao, Yao-Yuan;
McDermott, Samuel D.;
McNanna, Mitch;
Medford, Michael;
Meerburg, P. Daniel;
Meyer, Manuel;
Mirbabayi, Mehrdad;
Mishra-Sharma, Siddharth;
Marc, Moniez;
More, Surhud;
Moustakas, John;
Muñoz, Julian B.;
Murgia, Simona;
Myers, Adam D.;
Nadler, Ethan O.;
Necib, Lina;
Newburgh, Laura;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nord, Brian;
Nourbakhsh, Erfan;
Nuss, Eric;
O'Connor, Paul;
Pace, Andrew B.;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Palmese, Antonella;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Peter, Annika H. G.;
Piacentni, Francesco;
Piacentini, Francesco;
Plazas, Andrés;
Polin, Daniel A.;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda;
Read, Justin I.;
Ritz, Steven;
Robertson, Brant E.;
Rose, Benjamin;
Rosenfeld, Rogerio;
Rossi, Graziano;
Samushia, Lado;
Sánchez, Javier;
Sánchez-Conde, Miguel A.;
Schaan, Emmanuel;
Sehgal, Neelima;
Senatore, Leonardo;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Shipp, Nora;
Simon, Joshua D.;
Simon, Sara;
Slatyer, Tracy R.;
Slosar, Anže;
Sridhar, Srivatsan;
Stebbins, Albert;
Straniero, Oscar;
Strigari, Louis E.;
Tait, Tim M. P.;
Tollerud, Erik;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Uhlemann, Cora;
Urenña-López, L. Arturo;
Verma, Aprajita;
Vilalta, Ricardo;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Mei-Yu;
Watson, Scott;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Wittman, David;
Xu, Weishuang;
Yanny, Brian;
Young, Sam;
Yu, Hai-Bo;
Zaharijas, Gabrijela;
Zentner, Andrew R.;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2019-03-11
Astrophysical observations currently provide the only robust, empirical
measurements of dark matter. In the coming decade, astrophysical observations
will guide other experimental efforts, while simultaneously probing unique
regions of dark matter parameter space. This white paper summarizes
astrophysical observations that can constrain the fundamental physics of dark
matter in the era of LSST. We describe how astrophysical observations will
inform our understanding of the fundamental properties of dark matter, such as
particle mass, self-interaction strength, non-gravitational interactions with
the Standard Model, and compact object abundances. Additionally, we highlight
theoretical work and experimental/observational facilities that will complement
LSST to strengthen our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of dark
matter.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.09565 [pdf] - 1791507
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy
Survey: Survey Overview and Supernova Spectroscopy
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Kim, A. G.;
Möller, A.;
Sako, M.;
Castander, F. J.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Lidman, C.;
Scolnic, D.;
Brout, D.;
Davis, T. M.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kessler, R.;
Lasker, J.;
Macaulay, E.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Zhang, B.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Casas, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crawford, S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Graham, M. L.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Wiseman, P.;
Zheng, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2018-11-23
We present spectroscopy from the first three seasons of the Dark Energy
Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN). We describe the supernova spectroscopic
program in full: strategy, observations, data reduction, and classification. We
have spectroscopically confirmed 307 supernovae, including 251 type Ia
supernovae (SNe Ia) over a redshift range of $0.017 < z < 0.85$. We determine
the effective spectroscopic selection function for our sample, and use it to
investigate the redshift-dependent bias on the distance moduli of SNe Ia we
have classified. We also provide a full overview of the strategy, observations,
and data products of DES-SN, which has discovered 12,015 likely supernovae
during these first three seasons. The data presented here are used for the
first cosmology analysis by DES-SN ('DES-SN3YR'), the results of which are
given in DES Collaboration (2018a).
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02380 [pdf] - 1846831
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy
Survey: Effects of Chromatic Corrections to Supernova Photometry on
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
Lasker, J.;
Kessler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Brout, D.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, T. M.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Asorey, J.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Childress, M.;
Frieman, J.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kasai, E.;
Li, T. S.;
March, M.;
Morganson, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Swann, E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Wester, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2018-11-07
Calibration uncertainties have been the leading systematic uncertainty in
recent analyses using type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) to measure cosmological
parameters. To improve the calibration, we present the application of Spectral
Energy Distribution (SED)-dependent "chromatic corrections" to the supernova
light-curve photometry from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). These corrections
depend on the combined atmospheric and instrumental transmission function for
each exposure, and they affect photometry at the 0.01 mag (1%) level,
comparable to systematic uncertainties in calibration and photometry. Fitting
our combined DES and low-z SN Ia sample with Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO)
and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) priors for the cosmological parameters
$\Omega_{\rm m}$ (the fraction of the critical density of the universe
comprised of matter) and w (the dark energy equation of state parameter), we
compare those parameters before and after applying the corrections. We find the
change in w and $\Omega_{\rm m}$ due to not including chromatic corrections are
-0.002 and 0.000, respectively, for the DES-SN3YR sample with BAO and CMB
priors, consistent with a larger DES-SN3YR-like simulation, which has a
w-change of 0.0005 with an uncertainty of 0.008 and an $\Omega_{\rm m}$ change
of 0.000 with an uncertainty of 0.002 . However, when considering samples on
individual CCDs we find large redshift-dependent biases (approximately 0.02 in
distance modulus) for supernova distances.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.05643 [pdf] - 1824849
DES Science Portal: Computing Photometric Redshifts
Gschwend, Julia;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Ogando, Ricardo;
Neto, Angelo Fausti;
Maia, Marcio;
da Costa, Luiz;
Lima, Marcos;
Pellegrini, Paulo;
Campisano, Riccardo;
Singulani, Cristiano;
Adean, Carlos;
Benoist, Christophe;
Aguena, Michel;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Davis, Tamara;
de Vicente, Juan;
Hartley, Will;
Hoyle, Ben;
Palmese, Antonella;
Sadeh, Iftach;
Abbot, Tim;
Abdalla, Filipe;
Allam, Sahar;
Annis, James;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Brooks, David;
Calcino, Josh;
Carollo, Daniela;
Castander, Francisco;
D'Andrea, Chris;
Desai, Shantanu;
Evrard, August;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Glazebrook, Karl;
Gerdes, David;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hinton, Samuel;
Hollowood, Devon;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Hoormann, Janie;
James, David;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lewis, Geraint;
Lidman, Chris;
Lin, Huan;
Macaulay, Edward;
Marshall, Jeniffer;
Melchior, Peter;
Miquel, Ramon;
Moller, Anais;
Plazas, Andrés;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Santiago, Basilio;
Scarpine, Vic;
Schindler, Rafe;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Smith, Mathew;
Sobreira, Flavia;
Sommer, Natalia Eiré;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Tucker, Brad;
Tucker, Douglas;
Uddin, Syed;
Walker, Alistair
Submitted: 2017-08-18, last modified: 2018-09-02
A significant challenge facing photometric surveys for cosmological purposes
is the need to produce reliable redshift estimates. The estimation of
photometric redshifts (photo-zs) has been consolidated as the standard strategy
to bypass the high production costs and incompleteness of spectroscopic
redshift samples. Training-based photo-z methods require the preparation of a
high-quality list of spectroscopic redshifts, which needs to be constantly
updated. The photo-z training, validation, and estimation must be performed in
a consistent and reproducible way in order to accomplish the scientific
requirements. To meet this purpose, we developed an integrated web-based data
interface that not only provides the framework to carry out the above steps in
a systematic way, enabling the ease testing and comparison of different
algorithms, but also addresses the processing requirements by parallelizing the
calculation in a transparent way for the user. This framework called the
Science Portal (hereafter Portal) was developed in the context the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) to facilitate scientific analysis. In this paper, we show how the
Portal can provide a reliable environment to access vast data sets, provide
validation algorithms and metrics, even in the case of multiple photo-zs
methods. It is possible to maintain the provenance between the steps of a chain
of workflows while ensuring reproducibility of the results. We illustrate how
the Portal can be used to provide photo-z estimates using the DES first year
(Y1A1) data. While the DES collaboration is still developing techniques to
obtain more precise photo-zs, having a structured framework like the one
presented here is critical for the systematic vetting of DES algorithmic
improvements and the consistent production of photo-zs in the future DES
releases.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01536 [pdf] - 1747811
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Avila, S.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sanchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Moller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
ONeill, C. R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-08-28
We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of large-scale structure and lensing
correlations. Two-point correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.04869 [pdf] - 1743661
Rapidly evolving transients in the Dark Energy Survey
Pursiainen, M.;
Childress, M.;
Smith, M.;
Prajs, S.;
Sullivan, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Foley, R. J.;
Asorey, J.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Curtin, C.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gutierrez, C.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Inserra, C.;
Kessler, R.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Sako, M.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Wiseman, P.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-03-13, last modified: 2018-08-22
We present the results of a search for rapidly evolving transients in the
Dark Energy Survey Supernova Programme. These events are characterized by fast
light curve evolution (rise to peak in $\lesssim 10$ d and exponential decline
in $\lesssim30$ d after peak). We discovered 72 events, including 37 transients
with a spectroscopic redshift from host galaxy spectral features. The 37 events
increase the total number of rapid optical transients by more than factor of
two. They are found at a wide range of redshifts ($0.05<z<1.56$) and peak
brightnesses ($-15.75>M_\mathrm{g}>-22.25$). The multiband photometry is well
fit by a blackbody up to few weeks after peak. The events appear to be hot
($T\approx10000-30000$ K) and large ($R\approx 10^{14}-2\cdot10^{15}$ cm) at
peak, and generally expand and cool in time, though some events show evidence
for a receding photosphere with roughly constant temperature. Spectra taken
around peak are dominated by a blue featureless continuum consistent with hot,
optically thick ejecta. We compare our events with a previously suggested
physical scenario involving shock breakout in an optically thick wind
surrounding a core-collapse supernova (CCSNe), we conclude that current models
for such a scenario might need an additional power source to describe the
exponential decline. We find these transients tend to favor star-forming host
galaxies, which could be consistent with a core-collapse origin. However, more
detailed modeling of the light curves is necessary to determine their physical
origin.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.11588 [pdf] - 1739840
Quasar Accretion Disk Sizes From Continuum Reverberation Mapping From
the Dark Energy Survey
Mudd, D.;
Martini, P.;
Zu, Y.;
Kochanek, C.;
Peterson, B.;
Kessler, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Hoorman, J.;
King, A.;
Lidman, C.;
Sommer, N.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Asorey, J.;
Hinton, S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
MaCaulay, E.;
Moller, A.;
O'Neill, C.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Fosalba, P.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Collaboration, The DES
Submitted: 2017-11-30, last modified: 2018-08-17
We present accretion disk size measurements for 15 luminous quasars at $0.7
\leq z \leq 1.9$ derived from $griz$ light curves from the Dark Energy Survey.
We measure the disk sizes with continuum reverberation mapping using two
methods, both of which are derived from the expectation that accretion disks
have a radial temperature gradient and the continuum emission at a given radius
is well-described by a single blackbody. In the first method we measure the
relative lags between the multiband light curves, which provides the relative
time lag between shorter and longer wavelength variations. From this, we are
only able to constrain upper limits on disk sizes, as many are consistent with
no lag the 2$\sigma$ level. The second method fits the model parameters for the
canonical thin disk directly rather than solving for the individual time lags
between the light curves. Our measurements demonstrate good agreement with the
sizes predicted by this model for accretion rates between 0.3-1 times the
Eddington rate. Given our large uncertainties, our measurements are also
consistent with disk size measurements from gravitational microlensing studies
of strongly lensed quasars, as well as other photometric reverberation mapping
results, that find disk sizes that are a factor of a few ($\sim$3) larger than
predictions.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01532 [pdf] - 1681410
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak
lensing source galaxies
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Rau, M. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Alarcon, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gatti, M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Mudd, D.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-11
We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensing-weighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z-\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30-band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, pre-seeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weak-lensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photo-z procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00992 [pdf] - 1648618
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods
and Systematics Characterization
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Davis, C.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rau, M. M.;
DeRose, J.;
De Vicente, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hoyle, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.
Submitted: 2017-09-04
We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clustering-based method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we cross-correlate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo-$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo-$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forest-based photo-$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo-$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.04526 [pdf] - 1587115
OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: Three year
results and first data release
Childress, M. J.;
Lidman, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Asorey, J.;
Yuan, F.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Banerji, M.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, S. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
James, D. J.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A. L.;
Kovacs, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lagattuta, D. J.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marriner, J.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Moller, A.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Mudd, D.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Ostrovski, F.;
Parkinson, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reed, S. L.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Seymour, N.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Spinka, H.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, B. R.
Submitted: 2017-08-15
We present results for the first three years of OzDES, a six-year programme
to obtain redshifts for objects in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) supernova
fields using the 2dF fibre positioner and AAOmega spectrograph on the
Anglo-Australian Telescope. OzDES is a multi-object spectroscopic survey
targeting multiple types of targets at multiple epochs over a multi-year
baseline, and is one of the first multi-object spectroscopic surveys to
dynamically include transients into the target list soon after their discovery.
At the end of three years, OzDES has spectroscopically confirmed almost 100
supernovae, and has measured redshifts for 17,000 objects, including the
redshifts of 2,566 supernova hosts. We examine how our ability to measure
redshifts for targets of various types depends on signal-to-noise, magnitude,
and exposure time, finding that our redshift success rate increases
significantly at a signal-to-noise of 2 to 3 per 1-Angstrom bin. We also find
that the change in signal-to-noise with exposure time closely matches the
Poisson limit for stacked exposures as long as 10 hours. We use these results
to predict the redshift yield of the full OzDES survey, as well as the
potential yields of future surveys on other facilities such as the 4m
Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), the Subaru Prime Focus
Spectrograph (PFS), and the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE). This work
marks the first OzDES data release, comprising 14,693 redshifts. OzDES is on
target to obtain over a yield of approximately 5,700 supernova host-galaxy
redshifts.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00357 [pdf] - 1422201
Galaxy clustering with photometric surveys using PDF redshift
information
Submitted: 2016-01-03, last modified: 2016-06-13
Photometric surveys produce large-area maps of the galaxy distribution, but
with less accurate redshift information than is obtained from spectroscopic
methods. Modern photometric redshift (photo-z) algorithms use galaxy
magnitudes, or colors, that are obtained through multi-band imaging to produce
a probability density function (PDF) for each galaxy in the map. We used
simulated data to study the effect of using different photo-z estimators to
assign galaxies to redshift bins in order to compare their effects on angular
clustering and galaxy bias measurements. We found that if we use the entire
PDF, rather than a single-point (mean or mode) estimate, the deviations are
less biased, especially when using narrow redshift bins. When the redshift bin
widths are $\Delta z=0.1$, the use of the entire PDF reduces the typical
measurement bias from 5%, when using single point estimates, to 3%.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.0934 [pdf] - 894095
Redshift-space distortions from the cross-correlation of photometric
populations
Submitted: 2013-05-04, last modified: 2014-11-06
Several papers have recently highlighted the possibility of measuring
redshift space distortions from angular auto-correlations of galaxies in
photometric redshift bins. In this work we extend this idea to include as
observables the cross-correlations between redshift bins, as an additional way
of measuring radial information. We show that this extra information allows to
reduce the recovered error in the growth rate index \gamma by a factor of ~2.
Although the final error in \gamma depends on the bias and the mean photometric
accuracy of the galaxy sample, the improvement from adding cross-correlations
is robust in different settings. Another factor of 2-3 improvement in the
determination of \gamma can be achieved by considering two galaxy populations
over the same photometric sky area but with different biases. This additional
gain is shown to be much larger than the one from the same populations when
observed over different areas of the sky (with twice the combined area). The
total improvement of ~5 implies that a photometric survey such as the Dark
Energy Survey should be able to recover \gamma at the 5-10% from the angular
clustering in linear scales of two different tracers. It can also constrain the
evolution of f(z)x\sigma_8(z) in few bins beyond z~0.8-0.9 at the 10-15% level
per-bin, compatible with recent constrains from lower-z spectroscopic surveys.
We also show how further improvement can be achieved by reducing the
photometric redshift error.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.6487 [pdf] - 1125136
Recovering 3D clustering information with angular correlations
Submitted: 2012-07-27, last modified: 2012-10-01
We study how to recover the full 3D clustering information of P(\vec{k},z),
including redshift space distortions (RSD), from 2D tomography using the
angular auto and cross spectra of different redshift bins C_\ell(z,z'). We
focus on quasilinear scales where the minimum scale \lambda_{min} or
corresponding maximum wavenumber k_{max}= 2\pi/\lambda_{min} is targeted to be
between k_{max}={0.05-0.2} h/Mpc. For spectroscopic surveys, we find that we
can recover the full 3D clustering information when the redshift bin width
\Delta z used in the 2D tomography is similar to the targeted minimum scale,
i.e. \Delta z ~ {0.6-0.8} \lambda_{min} H(z)/c which corresponds to \Delta z ~
0.01-0.05 for z<1. This value of \Delta z is optimal in the sense that larger
values of \Delta z lose information, while smaller values violate our minimum
scale requirement. For a narrow-band photometric survey, with photo-z error
\sigma_z=0.004, we find almost identical results to the spectroscopic survey
because the photo-z error is smaller than the optimal bin width \sigma_z<\Delta
z. For a typical broad-band photometric survey with \sigma_z=0.1, we have that
\sigma_z>\Delta z and most radial information is intrinsically lost. The
remaining information can be recovered from the 2D tomography if we use \Delta
z ~ 2\sigma_z. While 3D and 2D analysis are shown here to be equivalent, the
advantage of using angular positions and redshifts is that we do not need a
fiducial cosmology to convert to 3D coordinates. This avoids assumptions and
marginalization over the fiducial model. In addition, it becomes straight
forward to combine RSD, clustering and weak lensing in 2D space.