Normalized to: Stawicki, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0503576 [pdf] - 71958
On Quasilinear Perpendicular Diffusion
Submitted: 2005-03-26
Quasilinear perpendicular diffusion of charged particles in fluctuating
electromagnetic fields is the focus of this paper. A general transport
parameter for perpendicular diffusion is presented being valid for an arbitrary
turbulence geometry and a plasma wave dispersion relation varying arbitrarily
in wavevector. The new diffusion coefficient is evaluated in detail for slab
turbulence geometry for two special cases: (1) Alfv\'enic turbulence and (2)
dynamical magnetic turbulence. Furthermore, perpendicular diffusion in 2D
geometry is considered for a purely dynamical magnetic turbulence. The
derivations and numerical calculations presented here cast serious doubts on
the applicability of quasilinear theory for perpendicular diffusion.
Furthermore, they emphasize that nonlinear effects play a crucial role in the
context of perpendicular diffusion.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502477 [pdf] - 71268
Nonlinear Perpendicular Diffusion in Strong Turbulent Electromagnetic
Fields
Submitted: 2005-02-23
A nonlinear description for perpendicular particle diffusion in strong
electromagnetic fluctuations is developed by using the fundamental
Newton-Lorentz equation. Although not based on the same approach, the recently
presented nonlinear guiding center (NLGC) theory is recovered as a special
case. The approach used here is rather based on the argument that a well
defined particle gyromotion does not exist in strong fluctuations than on the
assumption that the particle gyrocenter follows magnetic field lines which
themselves separate diffusively. The assumption of a guiding center motion and
the diffusive separation of magnetic field lines is absolutely central to the
NLGC theory. It is argued that the NLGC result should provide most accurate
results for strong fluctuations. Furthermore, as a direct consequence of the
particle equation of motion, it is shown that particle diffusion in one
perpendicular direction is governed by the fluctuations in the other normal
direction. This results contradicts the NLGC result, where perpendicular
diffusion is triggered by fluctuations in the same direction. This is of
particular interest for anisotropic perpendicular diffusion in a
non-axisymmetric turbulence. Future numerical simulation results for
non-axisymmetric magnetic turbulence and their comparison with the approach
presented here and the NLGC theory have to provide an answer whether particle
diffusion in one perpendicular direction is governed by the fluctuations in the
other normal direction or by fluctuations in the same direction.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0501243 [pdf] - 1468731
Quasilinear Drift Of Cosmic Rays In Weak Turbulent Electromagnetic
Fields
Submitted: 2005-01-13
A general quasilinear transport parameter for particle drift in arbitrary
turbulence geometry is presented. The new drift coefficient is solely
characterized by a nonresonant term and is evaluated for slab and
two-dimensional turbulence geometry. The calculations presented here
demonstrate that fluctuating electric fields are a key quantity for
understanding quasilinear particle drift in slab geometry. It is shown that
particle drift does not exist in unpolarized and purely magnetic slab
fluctuations. This is in stark contrast to previous models, which are
restricted to slab geometry and the field line random walk limit. The
evaluation of the general transport parameter for two-dimensional turbulence
geometry, presented here for the first time for dynamical magnetic turbulence,
results in a drift coefficient valid for a magnetic power spectrum and
turbulence decay rate varying arbitrarily in wavenumber. For a two-component,
slab/two-dimensional turbulence model, numerical calculations are presented.
The new quasilinear drift, induced by the magnetic perturbations, is compared
with a standard drift expression related to the curvature and gradient of an
unperturbed heliospheric background magnetic field. The considerations
presented here offer a solid ground and natural explanation for the hitherto
puzzling observation that drift models often describe observations much better
when drift effects are reduced.