sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Shurtleff, Richard

Normalized to: Shurtleff, R.

7 article(s) in total.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.2514  [pdf] - 863386
Testing the Alignment Tendency of Some Polarized Radio Sources
Comments: 28 pages, 9 figures
Submitted: 2014-08-11
Measuring the alignment of polarized radio sources requires comparing vectors at different locations on the sky, i.e. on a sphere. A test of alignment is derived herein. While both large scale and coordinate independent, the test avoids the mathematical subtleties involved when comparing vectors at different locations on a curved surface. Applied to 5442 sources drawn from a published catalog, the analysis finds a level of alignment that would be matched by only 7% to 14% of data sets with the same sources but with random polarization directions. The locations of the sources involved and the directions that the vectors favor and the regions avoided are described as well.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1311.6118  [pdf] - 750764
A Large Scale Pattern from Optical Quasar Polarization Vectors
Comments: 20 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2013-11-24
Based on a published catalog of 355 quasars with significant optical linear polarization, it is shown here that the distribution of polarization directions is skewed, preferentially toward one location in the sky and away from a second. To show this, we calculate the average polarization angle as a function of position. The function makes a clean quadrupole on the sky offering the opportunity to apply multipoles including their spherical harmonic, Maxwell vector and symmetric tensor representations. The evidence suggests that observed polarization directions of optical quasars are not independent over very large angular scales, thereby confirming similar conclusions by others.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:0912.3897  [pdf] - 659429
Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays from Galactic Supernovae
Comments: 8 pages. This version, version 2, is updated with results from the LHC and Tevatron. It contains new comments. The underlying calculation is simplified, but not fundamentally changed from version 1
Submitted: 2009-12-21, last modified: 2012-07-23
Suppose that even the highest energy cosmic rays (CRs) observed on Earth are protons accelerated in local Milky Way Galaxy sources, with few if any from more distant sources. In this paper we treat the problem that supernovae remnants likely produce protons with energies up to about a PeV, but CRs with 100s of EeV energy are observed. We assume with minimal comment the idea that `new physics' is at work and we accept that a CR's collision energy at the Earth exceeds its kinetic energy as it travels through the Galaxy. There is some evidence that the collision energy-kinetic energy difference has been seen at the Tevatron and LHC, but it is small enough to attribute to standard physics. This sets the threshold for energy bifurcation. Based on this threshold and the CR spectrum endpoint, a formula for collision energy as a function of kinetic energy is derived. With the function and the observed CR spectrum we can predict the average spectrum of CR sources. Also we can estimate the collision energies of proton beams as terrestrial particle accelerators advance and produce beams with higher kinetic energies.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:0807.5085  [pdf] - 15025
On the Very-High-Energy Gamma Ray Spectra from Typical Supernovae Remnants
Comments: 30 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables, 1 problem set. Equations and conclusions unchanged in Version 2. Thanks to the referee and a reader, Version 2 has added discussions of (i) the reference frame, (ii) why the Galaxy doesn't contribute, (iii) how electrons can behave otherwise, (iv) why photons can be included. Typos, minor rewording, revised problem set
Submitted: 2008-07-31, last modified: 2008-09-21
Recently measured VHE gamma ray spectra from supernovae remnants (SNRs) are best fit by power laws with an exponential cutoff. But this feature does not occur at the `knee-equivalent' energy at which VHE gamma ray spectra are expected to reflect the `knee' in the otherwise featureless cosmic ray spectrum. In this article, the VHE gamma ray feature is explained as a consequence of a recently deduced quantum effect. The effect distinguishes `trajectory energy' from `particle state energy' and requires that the particle state energy depends strongly on gravitational potential at very high energies. Based on this effect and the observed CR spectrum, a tight two-parameter fit is obtained to the combined VHE gamma ray spectra of SNRs RX J1713.7-3946 and RX J0852.0-4622 and the Galactic Center ridge.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:0804.0851  [pdf] - 11512
Quantum Fields and Translations
Comments: 25 pages, 3 figures, Version 2 corrects three typos: (i) p5 line 4 add subscript (\Phi), (ii) Eq 7, delete P factor on left, (iii) Eq 12, delete (p) on left
Submitted: 2008-04-06, last modified: 2008-04-12
Modifications of a free quantum field calculation using translation-related concepts and general translation representations yield quantum fields for massive particles that as a consequence follow the classical trajectories of electrodynamics and geometrodynamics. The work allows an explanation for the unexpectedly high energy of cosmic rays. The explanation can be tested at the Large Hadron Collider once high energy proton beams are operational.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:0801.3085  [pdf] - 9201
Gravity, Cosmic Rays and the LHC
Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure, 3 problems
Submitted: 2008-01-20
The high energy proton beams expected when the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) comes online should provide a pass/fail test for a gravity-related explanation of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays. The model predicts that particles have two kinds energies, equal for null gravitational potentials and, in the potential at the Earth, differing significantly above one TeV. If correct, a 7 TeV trajectory energy proton at the LHC would deliver a 23.5 TeV particle state energy in a collision.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:0801.0071  [pdf] - 8540
Dual Phase Cosmic Rays
Comments: 19 pages, 2 figures, 11 problems, LaTeX
Submitted: 2007-12-30
A calculation based on flat spacetime symmetries shows how there can be two quantum phases. For one, extreme phase change determines a conventional classical trajectory and four-momentum, i.e. mass times four-velocity. The other phase occurs in an effective particle state, with the effective energy and momentum being the rate of change of the phase with respect to time and distance. A cosmic ray proton moves along a classical trajectory, but exists in an effective particle state with an effective energy that depends on the local gravitational potential. Assumptions are made so that a cosmic ray proton in an ultra-high energy state detected near the Earth was in a much less energetic state in interstellar space. A 300 EeV proton incident on the Earth was a 2 PeV proton in interstellar space. The model predicts such protons are in states with even more energy near the Sun than when near the Earth.