sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Kollmann, P.

Normalized to: Kollmann, P.

7 article(s) in total. 377 co-authors, from 1 to 5 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 13,0.

[1]  [pdf] - 2122734
The radiation belts of Jupiter and Saturn
Comments: 24 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2020-06-25
The era of outer planet orbiters (Galileo, Juno and Cassini) is advancing our understanding of how the radiation belts of Jupiter and Saturn are structured, form and evolve well beyond what had been possible during the age of flyby missions and ground-based observations. The nearly two decades-long datasets of these missions, in the context of detailed and long-term observations of Earth's radiation belts, highlight which of the processes that accelerate particles to relativistic kinetic energies and limit their flux intensity can be considered more universal, and thus key for most extraterrestrial magnetospheres, and which reflect the unique aspects of each planet and its magnetospheric system. In this chapter we focus on the in-situ radiation belt observations in the context of theory, simulations and relevant measurements by Earth-based observatories. We describe both the average state and the time variations of Jupiter's and Saturn's radiation belts and associate them with specific physical processes.
[2]  [pdf] - 2074548
Initial results from the New Horizons exploration of 2014 MU69, a small Kuiper Belt Object
Stern, S. A.; Weaver, H. A.; Spencer, J. R.; Olkin, C. B.; Gladstone, G. R.; Grundy, W. M.; Moore, J. M.; Cruikshank, D. P.; Elliott, H. A.; McKinnon, W. B.; Parker, J. Wm.; Verbiscer, A. J.; Young, L. A.; Aguilar, D. A.; Albers, J. M.; Andert, T.; Andrews, J. P.; Bagenal, F.; Banks, M. E.; Bauer, B. A.; Bauman, J. A.; Bechtold, K. E.; Beddingfield, C. B.; Behrooz, N.; Beisser, K. B.; Benecchi, S. D.; Bernardoni, E.; Beyer, R. A.; Bhaskaran, S.; Bierson, C. J.; Binzel, R. P.; Birath, E. M.; Bird, M. K.; Boone, D. R.; Bowman, A. F.; Bray, V. J.; Britt, D. T.; Brown, L. E.; Buckley, M. R.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Burke, L. M.; Bushman, S. S.; Carcich, B.; Chaikin, A. L.; Chavez, C. L.; Cheng, A. F.; Colwell, E. J.; Conard, S. J.; Conner, M. P.; Conrad, C. A.; Cook, J. C.; Cooper, S. B.; Custodio, O. S.; Ore, C. M. Dalle; Deboy, C. C.; Dharmavaram, P.; Dhingra, R. D.; Dunn, G. F.; Earle, A. M.; Egan, A. F.; Eisig, J.; El-Maarry, M. R.; Engelbrecht, C.; Enke, B. L.; Ercol, C. J.; Fattig, E. D.; Ferrell, C. L.; Finley, T. J.; Firer, J.; Fischetti, J.; Folkner, W. M.; Fosbury, M. N.; Fountain, G. H.; Freeze, J. M.; Gabasova, L.; Glaze, L. S.; Green, J. L.; Griffith, G. A.; Guo, Y.; Hahn, M.; Hals, D. W.; Hamilton, D. P.; Hamilton, S. A.; Hanley, J. J.; Harch, A.; Harmon, K. A.; Hart, H. M.; Hayes, J.; Hersman, C. B.; Hill, M. E.; Hill, T. A.; Hofgartner, J. D.; Holdridge, M. E.; Horányi, M.; Hosadurga, A.; Howard, A. D.; Howett, C. J. A.; Jaskulek, S. E.; Jennings, D. E.; Jensen, J. R.; Jones, M. R.; Kang, H. K.; Katz, D. J.; Kaufmann, D. E.; Kavelaars, J. J.; Keane, J. T.; Keleher, G. P.; Kinczyk, M.; Kochte, M. C.; Kollmann, P.; Krimigis, S. M.; Kruizinga, G. L.; Kusnierkiewicz, D. Y.; Lahr, M. S.; Lauer, T. R.; Lawrence, G. B.; Lee, J. E.; Lessac-Chenen, E. J.; Linscott, I. R.; Lisse, C. M.; Lunsford, A. W.; Mages, D. M.; Mallder, V. A.; Martin, N. P.; May, B. H.; McComas, D. J.; McNutt, R. L.; Mehoke, Jr. D. S.; Mehoke, T. S.; Nelson, D. S.; Nguyen, H. D.; Núñez, J. I.; Ocampo, A. C.; Owen, W. M.; Oxton, G. K.; Parker, A. H.; Pätzold, M.; Pelgrift, J. Y.; Pelletier, F. J.; Pineau, J. P.; Piquette, M. R.; Porter, S. B.; Protopapa, S.; Quirico, E.; Redfern, J. A.; Regiec, A. L.; Reitsema, H. J.; Reuter, D. C.; Richardson, D. C.; Riedel, J. E.; Ritterbush, M. A.; Robbins, S. J.; Rodgers, D. J.; Rogers, G. D.; Rose, D. M.; Rosendall, P. E.; Runyon, K. D.; Ryschkewitsch, M. G.; Saina, M. M.; Salinas, M. J.; Schenk, P. M.; Scherrer, J. R.; Schlei, W. R.; Schmitt, B.; Schultz, D. J.; Schurr, D. C.; Scipioni, F.; Sepan, R. L.; Shelton, R. G.; Showalter, M. R.; Simon, M.; Singer, K. N.; Stahlheber, E. W.; Stanbridge, D. R.; Stansberry, J. A.; Steffl, A. J.; Strobel, D. F.; Stothoff, M. M.; Stryk, T.; Stuart, J. R.; Summers, M. E.; Tapley, M. B.; Taylor, A.; Taylor, H. W.; Tedford, R. M.; Throop, H. B.; Turner, L. S.; Umurhan, O. M.; Van Eck, J.; Velez, D.; Versteeg, M. H.; Vincent, M. A.; Webbert, R. W.; Weidner, S. E.; Weigle, G. E.; Wendel, J. R.; White, O. L.; Whittenburg, K. E.; Williams, B. G.; Williams, K. E.; Williams, S. P.; Winters, H. L.; Zangari, A. M.; Zurbuchen, T. H.
Comments: 43 pages, 8 figure
Submitted: 2020-04-02
The Kuiper Belt is a distant region of the Solar System. On 1 January 2019, the New Horizons spacecraft flew close to (486958) 2014 MU69, a Cold Classical Kuiper Belt Object, a class of objects that have never been heated by the Sun and are therefore well preserved since their formation. Here we describe initial results from these encounter observations. MU69 is a bi-lobed contact binary with a flattened shape, discrete geological units, and noticeable albedo heterogeneity. However, there is little surface color and compositional heterogeneity. No evidence for satellites, ring or dust structures, gas coma, or solar wind interactions was detected. By origin MU69 appears consistent with pebble cloud collapse followed by a low velocity merger of its two lobes.
[3]  [pdf] - 1931007
The in-situ exploration of Jupiter's radiation belts (A White Paper submitted in response to ESA's Voyage 2050 Call)
Comments: 28 pages, 3 Tables, 11 Figures
Submitted: 2019-08-06
Jupiter has the most energetic and complex radiation belts in our solar system. Their hazardous environment is the reason why so many spacecraft avoid rather than investigate them, and explains how they have kept many of their secrets so well hidden, despite having been studied for decades. In this White Paper we argue why these secrets are worth unveiling. Jupiter's radiation belts and the vast magnetosphere that encloses them constitute an unprecedented physical laboratory, suitable for both interdisciplinary and novel scientific investigations: from studying fundamental high energy plasma physics processes which operate throughout the universe, such as adiabatic charged particle acceleration and nonlinear wave-particle interactions; to exploiting the astrobiological consequences of energetic particle radiation. The in-situ exploration of the uninviting environment of Jupiter's radiation belts present us with many challenges in mission design, science planning, instrumentation and technology development. We address these challenges by reviewing the different options that exist for direct and indirect observation of this unique system. We stress the need for new instruments, the value of synergistic Earth and Jupiter-based remote sensing and in-situ investigations, and the vital importance of multi-spacecraft, in-situ measurements. While simultaneous, multi-point in-situ observations have long become the standard for exploring electromagnetic interactions in the inner solar system, they have never taken place at Jupiter or any strongly magnetized planet besides Earth. We conclude that a dedicated multi-spacecraft mission to Jupiter's radiation belts is an essential and obvious way forward and deserves to be given a high priority in ESA's Voyage 2050 programme.
[4]  [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail; Mandt, Kathleen; Hurley, Dana; Lisse, Carey; Izenberg, Noam; Smith, H. Todd; Westlake, Joseph; Bunce, Emma; Arridge, Christopher; Masters, Adam; Hofstadter, Mark; Simon, Amy; Brandt, Pontus; Clark, George; Cohen, Ian; Allen, Robert; Vine, Sarah; Hansen, Kenneth; Hospodarsky, George; Kurth, William; Romani, Paul; Lamy, Laurent; Zarka, Philippe; Cao, Hao; Paty, Carol; Hedman, Matthew; Roussos, Elias; Cruikshank, Dale; Farrell, William; Fieseler, Paul; Coates, Andrew; Yelle, Roger; Parkinson, Christopher; Militzer, Burkhard; Grodent, Denis; Kollmann, Peter; McNutt, Ralph; André, Nicolas; Strange, Nathan; Barnes, Jason; Dones, Luke; Denk, Tilmann; Rathbun, Julie; Lunine, Jonathan; Desai, Ravi; Cochrane, Corey; Sayanagi, Kunio M.; Postberg, Frank; Ebert, Robert; Hill, Thomas; Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo; Regoli, Leonardo; Pontius, Duane; Stanley, Sabine; Greathouse, Thomas; Saur, Joachim; Marouf, Essam; Bergman, Jan; Higgins, Chuck; Johnson, Robert; Thomsen, Michelle; Soderlund, Krista; Jia, Xianzhe; Wilson, Robert; Englander, Jacob; Burch, Jim; Nordheim, Tom; Grava, Cesare; Baines, Kevin; Quick, Lynnae; Russell, Christopher; Cravens, Thomas; Cecconi, Baptiste; Aslam, Shahid; Bray, Veronica; Garcia-Sage, Katherine; Richardson, John; Clark, John; Hsu, Sean; Achterberg, Richard; Sergis, Nick; Paganelli, Flora; Kempf, Sasha; Orton, Glenn; Portyankina, Ganna; Jones, Geraint; Economou, Thanasis; Livengood, Timothy; Krimigi, Stamatios; Szalay, James; Jackman, Catriona; Valek, Phillip; Lecacheux, Alain; Colwell, Joshua; Jasinski, Jamie; Tosi, Federico; Sulaiman, Ali; Galand, Marina; Kotova, Anna; Khurana, Krishan; Kivelson, Margaret; Strobel, Darrell; Radiota, Aikaterina; Estrada, Paul; Livi, Stefano; Azari, Abigail; Yates, Japheth; Allegrini, Frederic; Vogt, Marissa; Felici, Marianna; Luhmann, Janet; Filacchione, Gianrico; Moore, Luke
Comments: Exoplanet Science Strategy White Paper, submitted to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Space Studies Board, 9 March 2018
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior, and what implications does that field have for the structure of the magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[5]  [pdf] - 1502227
The Puzzling Detection of X-rays From Pluto by Chandra
Comments: 17 Pages, 3 Figures, 2 Tables Key words: Pluto, Chandra, Atmospheres, Coma, Solar Wind, Charge Exchange Spectroscopy, X-rays
Submitted: 2016-10-25
Using Chandra ACIS-S, we have obtained imaging Xray spectrophotometry of the Pluto system in support of the New Horizons flyby on 14 July 2015. 174 ksec of observations were obtained on 4 visits in Feb 2014 to Aug 2015. We measured a net signal of 6.8 counts and a noise level of 1.2 counts in a comoving 11 x 11 pixel box (100 x 100 R_Pluto) in the 0.31 to 0.60 keV passband for a detection at > 99.95 C.L. The Pluto photons do not match the background spectrum, are coincident with a 90% flux aperture comoving with Pluto, and are not sky source confused. The mean 0.31 to 0.60 keV Xray power from Pluto is 200 MW, in the midrange of Xray power levels seen for known solar system emission sources: auroral precipitation, solar Xray scattering, and charge exchange (CXE) between solar wind (SW) ions & atmospheric neutrals. We eliminate auroral effects as a source, as Pluto has no known magnetic field & the New Horizons Alice UV spectrometer detected no airglow from Pluto during the flyby. Nano-scale atmospheric haze particles could lead to enhanced resonant scattering of solar X-rays from Pluto, but the energy signature of the detected photons does not match the solar spectrum and estimates of Plutos scattered Xray emission are > 100 times below the 3.9e-5 cps found in our observations. CXE emission from SW carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen ions can produce the energy signature seen, and the 6e25 neutral gas escape rate from Pluto deduced from New Horizons data can support the 3.0e24 Xray photons/sec emission rate required by our observations. Using the SW proton density and speed measured by the Solar Wind Around Pluto (SWAP) instrument in the vicinity of Pluto at the time of the photon emissions, we find too few SW minor ions flowing into the 11 x 11 pixel box centered on Pluto than are needed to support the observed emission rate unless the SW is significantly focused and enhanced in this region.
[6]  [pdf] - 1400614
Plutos interaction with its space environment: Solar Wind, Energetic Particles & Dust
Submitted: 2016-05-02
The New Horizons spacecraft carried three instruments that measured the space environment near Pluto as it flew by on 14 July 2015. The Solar Wind Around Pluto instrument revealed an interaction region confined sunward of Pluto to within about 6 Pluto radii. The surprisingly small size is consistent with a reduced atmospheric escape rate as well as a particularly high solar wind flux. The Pluto Energetic Particle Spectrometer Science Investigation (PEPSSI) observations suggested ions are accelerated and-or deflected around Pluto. In the wake of the interaction region PEPSSI observed suprathermal particle fluxes about one tenth the flux in the interplanetary medium, increasing with distance downstream. The Student Dust Counter, which measures radius greater than 1.4 um grains, detected 1 candidate impact from 5days before to 5 days after closest approach, indicating an upper limit for the dust density in the Pluto system of 4.6 per cubic km.
[7]  [pdf] - 1300465
The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons
Stern, S. A.; Bagenal, F.; Ennico, K.; Gladstone, G. R.; Grundy, W. M.; McKinnon, W. B.; Moore, J. M.; Olkin, C. B.; Spencer, J. R.; Weaver, H. A.; Young, L. A.; Andert, T.; Andrews, J.; Banks, M.; Bauer, B.; Bauman, J.; Barnouin, O. S.; Bedini, P.; Beisser, K.; Beyer, R. A.; Bhaskaran, S.; Binzel, R. P.; Birath, E.; Bird, M.; Bogan, D. J.; Bowman, A.; Bray, V. J.; Brozovic, M.; Bryan, C.; Buckley, M. R.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Bushman, S. S.; Calloway, A.; Carcich, B.; Cheng, A. F.; Conard, S.; Conrad, C. A.; Cook, J. C.; Cruikshank, D. P.; Custodio, O. S.; Ore, C. M. Dalle; Deboy, C.; Dischner, Z. J. B.; Dumont, P.; Earle, A. M.; Elliott, H. A.; Ercol, J.; Ernst, C. M.; Finley, T.; Flanigan, S. H.; Fountain, G.; Freeze, M. J.; Greathouse, T.; Green, J. L.; Guo, Y.; Hahn, M.; Hamilton, D. P.; Hamilton, S. A.; Hanley, J.; Harch, A.; Hart, H. M.; Hersman, C. B.; Hill, A.; Hill, M. E.; Hinson, D. P.; Holdridge, M. E.; Horanyi, M.; Howard, A. D.; Howett, C. J. A.; Jackman, C.; Jacobson, R. A.; Jennings, D. E.; Kammer, J. A.; Kang, H. K.; Kaufmann, D. E.; Kollmann, P.; Krimigis, S. M.; Kusnierkiewicz, D.; Lauer, T. R.; Lee, J. E.; Lindstrom, K. L.; Linscott, I. R.; Lisse, C. M.; Lunsford, A. W.; Mallder, V. A.; Martin, N.; McComas, D. J.; McNutt, R. L.; Mehoke, D.; Mehoke, T.; Melin, E. D.; Mutchler, M.; Nelson, D.; Nimmo, F.; Nunez, J. I.; Ocampo, A.; Owen, W. M.; Paetzold, M.; Page, B.; Parker, A. H.; Parker, J. W.; Pelletier, F.; Peterson, J.; Pinkine, N.; Piquette, M.; Porter, S. B.; Protopapa, S.; Redfern, J.; Reitsema, H. J.; Reuter, D. C.; Roberts, J. H.; Robbins, S. J.; Rogers, G.; Rose, D.; Runyon, K.; Retherford, K. D.; Ryschkewitsch, M. G.; Schenk, P.; Schindhelm, E.; Sepan, B.; Showalter, M. R.; Singer, K. N.; Soluri, M.; Stanbridge, D.; Steffl, A. J.; Strobel, D. F.; Stryk, T.; Summers, M. E.; Szalay, J. R.; Tapley, M.; Taylor, A.; Taylor, H.; Throop, H. B.; Tsang, C. C. C.; Tyler, G. L.; Umurhan, O. M.; Verbiscer, A. J.; Versteeg, M. H.; Vincent, M.; Webbert, R.; Weidner, S.; Weigle, G. E.; White, O. L.; Whittenburg, K.; Williams, B. G.; Williams, K.; Williams, S.; Woods, W. W.; Zangari, A. M.; Zirnstein, E.
Comments: 8 pages - Initial Science paper from NASA's New Horizons Pluto Encounter
Submitted: 2015-10-26
The Pluto system was recently explored by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, making closest approach on 14 July 2015. Pluto's surface displays diverse landforms, terrain ages, albedos, colors, and composition gradients. Evidence is found for a water-ice crust, geologically young surface units, surface ice convection, wind streaks, volatile transport, and glacial flow. Pluto's atmosphere is highly extended, with trace hydrocarbons, a global haze layer, and a surface pressure near 10 microbars. Pluto's diverse surface geology and long-term activity raise fundamental questions about how small planets remain active many billions of years after formation. Pluto's large moon Charon displays tectonics and evidence for a heterogeneous crustal composition, its north pole displays puzzling dark terrain. Small satellites Hydra and Nix have higher albedos than expected.