Normalized to: Jalilvand, M.

**3** article(s) in total. **9** co-authors, from **1** to **3** common article(s). Median position in authors list is **1,0**.

[1] oai:arXiv.org:1907.00071 [pdf] - 2038229

A new estimator for gravitational lensing using galaxy and intensity
mapping surveys

Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures. Updated with a shortened version and minor
changes. Some of the equations are put in the Appendix

Submitted: **2019-06-28**, last modified: **2019-08-02**

We propose a new tomographic estimator for the gravitational lensing
potential, based on a combination of intensity mapping (IM) and galaxy number
counts. The estimator can be written schematically as IM$\times$galaxy $-$
galaxy$\times$IM; this combination allows to greatly reduce the contamination
by density-density correlations, thus isolating the lensing signal. As a pure
cross-correlation estimator, it is additionally less susceptible to systematic
effects. We show that the new estimator strongly suppresses cosmic variance and
consequently improves the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the detection of
lensing, especially on linear scales and intermediate redshifts. For cosmic
variance dominated surveys the SNR of our estimator is a factor 30 larger than
the SNR obtained from the correlation of galaxy number counts only. Shot noise
and interferometer noise reduce the SNR. For the specific example of DES
cross-correlated with HIRAX, the SNR is around 4, whereas for Euclid
cross-correlated with HIRAX it reaches 52. This corresponds to an improvement
of a factor 4-5 compared to the SNR from DES alone. For Euclid cross-correlated
with HIRAX the improvement with respect to Euclid alone strongly depends on the
redshift. We find that the improvement is particularly important for redshifts
below 1.6, where it reaches 5. This makes our estimator especially valuable to
test dark energy and modified gravity, that are expected to leave an impact at
low and intermediate redshifts.

[2] oai:arXiv.org:1907.13109 [pdf] - 2057709

Non-linear contributions to angular power spectra

Comments: 30 pages, 15 figures

Submitted: **2019-07-30**

Future galaxy clustering surveys will probe small scales where
non-linearities become important. Since the number of modes accessible on
intermediate to small scales is very high, having a precise model at these
scales is important especially in the context of discriminating alternative
cosmological models from the standard one. In the mildly non-linear regime,
such models typically differ from each other, and galaxy clustering data will
become very precise on these scales in the near future. As the observable
quantity is the angular power spectrum in redshift space, it is important to
study the effects of non-linear density and redshift space distortion (RSD) in
the angular power spectrum. We compute non-linear contributions to the angular
power spectrum using a flat-sky approximation that we introduce in this work,
and compare the results of different perturbative approaches with $N$-body
simulations. We find that the TNS perturbative approach is significantly closer
to the $N$-body result than Eulerian or Lagrangian 1-loop approximations,
effective field theory of large scale structure or a halofit-inspired model.
However, none of these prescriptions is accurate enough to model the angular
power spectrum well into the non-linear regime. In addition, for narrow
redshift bins, $\Delta z \lesssim 0.01$, the angular power spectrum acquires
non-linear contributions on all scales, right down to $\ell=2$, and is hence
not a reliable tool at this time. To overcome this problem, we need to model
non-linear RSD terms, for example as TNS does, but for a matter power spectrum
that remains reasonably accurate well into the deeply non-linear regime, such
as halofit.

[3] oai:arXiv.org:1807.01351 [pdf] - 1814938

Intensity mapping of the 21cm emission: lensing

Comments: 33 pages, 17 figures. Corrected typos and new references added. To be
submitted to JCAP

Submitted: **2018-07-03**, last modified: **2018-07-09**

In this paper, we study lensing of 21cm intensity mapping (IM). Like in the
cosmic microwave background (CMB), there is no first order lensing in intensity
mapping. The first effects in the power spectrum are therefore of second and
third order. Despite this, lensing of the CMB power spectrum is an important
effect that needs to be taken into account, which motivates the study of the
impact of lensing on the IM power spectrum. We derive a general formula up to
third order in perturbation theory including all the terms with two derivatives
of the gravitational potential, i.e. the dominant terms on sub-Hubble scales.
We then show that in intensity mapping there is a new lensing term which is not
present in the CMB. We obtain that the signal-to-noise of 21 cm lensing for
futuristic surveys like SKA2 is about 10. We find that surveys probing only
large scales, lmax < 700, can safely neglect the lensing of the intensity
mapping power spectrum, but that otherwise this effect should be included.