sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Formaggio, Joseph A.

Normalized to: Formaggio, J.

18 article(s) in total. 759 co-authors, from 1 to 8 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 11,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.07450  [pdf] - 1981331
Proceedings of The Magnificent CE$\nu$NS Workshop 2018
Comments: The Magnificent CEvNS Workshop (2018), Nov 2-3, 2018; Chicago, IL, USA; 44 contributions
Submitted: 2019-10-16
The Magnificent CE$\nu$NS Workshop (2018) was held November 2 & 3 of 2018 on the University of Chicago campus and brought together theorists, phenomenologists, and experimentalists working in numerous areas but sharing a common interest in the process of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$\nu$NS). This is a collection of abstract-like summaries of the talks given at the meeting, including links to the slides presented. This document and the slides from the meeting provide an overview of the field and a snapshot of the robust CE$\nu$NS-related efforts both planned and underway.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.06048  [pdf] - 2007972
An improved upper limit on the neutrino mass from a direct kinematic method by KATRIN
Aker, M.; Altenmüller, K.; Arenz, M.; Babutzka, M.; Barrett, J.; Bauer, S.; Beck, M.; Beglarian, A.; Behrens, J.; Bergmann, T.; Besserer, U.; Blaum, K.; Block, F.; Bobien, S.; Bokeloh, K.; Bonn, J.; Bornschein, B.; Bornschein, L.; Bouquet, H.; Brunst, T.; Caldwell, T. S.; La Cascio, L.; Chilingaryan, S.; Choi, W.; Corona, T. J.; Debowski, K.; Deffert, M.; Descher, M.; Doe, P. J.; Dragoun, O.; Drexlin, G.; Dunmore, J. A.; Dyba, S.; Edzards, F.; Eisenblätter, L.; Eitel, K.; Ellinger, E.; Engel, R.; Enomoto, S.; Erhard, M.; Eversheim, D.; Fedkevych, M.; Felden, A.; Fischer, S.; Flatt, B.; Formaggio, J. A.; Fränkle, F. M.; Franklin, G. B.; Frankrone, H.; Friedel, F.; Fuchs, D.; Fulst, A.; Furse, D.; Gauda, K.; Gemmeke, H.; Gil, W.; Glück, F.; Görhardt, S.; Groh, S.; Grohmann, S.; Grössle, R.; Gumbsheimer, R.; Minh, M. Ha; Hackenjos, M.; Hannen, V.; Harms, F.; Hartmann, J.; Haußmann, N.; Heizmann, F.; Helbing, K.; Hickford, S.; Hilk, D.; Hillen, B.; Hillesheimer, D.; Hinz, D.; Höhn, T.; Holzapfel, B.; Holzmann, S.; Houdy, T.; Howe, M. A.; Huber, A.; Jansen, A.; Kaboth, A.; Karl, C.; Kazachenko, O.; Kellerer, J.; Kernert, N.; Kippenbrock, L.; Kleesiek, M.; Klein, M.; Köhler, C.; Köllenberger, L.; Kopmann, A.; Korzeczek, M.; Kosmider, A.; Kovalí, A.; Krasch, B.; Kraus, M.; Krause, H.; Kuckert, L.; Kuffner, B.; Kunka, N.; Lasserre, T.; Le, T. L.; Lebeda, O.; Leber, M.; Lehnert, B.; Letnev, J.; Leven, F.; Lichter, S.; Lobashev, V. M.; Lokhov, A.; Machatschek, M.; Malcherek, E.; Müller, K.; Mark, M.; Marsteller, A.; Martin, E. L.; Melzer, C.; Menshikov, A.; Mertens, S.; Minter, L. I.; Mirz, S.; Monreal, B.; Guzman, P. I. Morales; Müller, K.; Naumann, U.; Ndeke, W.; Neumann, H.; Niemes, S.; Noe, M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ortjohann, H. -W.; Osipowicz, A.; Ostrick, B.; Otten, E.; Parno, D. S.; Phillips, D. G.; Plischke, P.; Pollithy, A.; Poon, A. W. P.; Pouryamout, J.; Prall, M.; Priester, F.; Röllig, M.; Röttele, C.; Ranitzsch, P. C. -O.; Rest, O.; Rinderspacher, R.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rodenbeck, C.; Rohr, P.; Roll, Ch.; Rupp, S.; Rysavy, M.; Sack, R.; Saenz, A.; Schäfer, P.; Schimpf, L.; Schlösser, K.; Schlösser, M.; Schlüter, L.; Schön, H.; Schönung, K.; Schrank, M.; Schulz, B.; Schwarz, J.; Seitz-Moskaliuk, H.; Seller, W.; Sibille, V.; Siegmann, D.; Skasyrskaya, A.; Slezak, M.; Spalek, A.; Spanier, F.; Steidl, M.; Steinbrink, N.; Sturm, M.; Suesser, M.; Sun, M.; Tcherniakhovski, D.; Telle, H. H.; Thümmler, T.; Thorne, L. A.; Titov, N.; Tkachev, I.; Trost, N.; Urban, K.; Venos, D.; Valerius, K.; VanDevender, B. A.; Vianden, R.; Hernandez, A. P. Vizcaya; Wall, B. L.; Wüstling, S.; Weber, M.; Weinheimer, C.; Weiss, C.; Welte, S.; Wendel, J.; Wierman, K. J.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wolf, J.; Xu, W.; Yen, Y. -R.; Zacher, M.; Zadorozhny, S.; Zboril, M.; Zeller, G.
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-09-13
We report on the neutrino mass measurement result from the first four-week science run of the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino experiment KATRIN in spring 2019. Beta-decay electrons from a high-purity gaseous molecular tritium source are energy analyzed by a high-resolution MAC-E filter. A fit of the integrated electron spectrum over a narrow interval around the kinematic endpoint at 18.57 keV gives an effective neutrino mass square value of $(-1.0^{+0.9}_{-1.1})$ eV$^2$. From this we derive an upper limit of 1.1 eV (90$\%$ confidence level) on the absolute mass scale of neutrinos. This value coincides with the KATRIN sensitivity. It improves upon previous mass limits from kinematic measurements by almost a factor of two and provides model-independent input to cosmological studies of structure formation.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.06069  [pdf] - 2080883
First operation of the KATRIN experiment with tritium
Aker, M.; Altenmüller, K.; Arenz, M.; Baek, W. -J.; Barrett, J.; Beglarian, A.; Behrens, J.; Berlev, A.; Besserer, U.; Blaum, K.; Block, F.; Bobien, S.; Bornschein, B.; Bornschein, L.; Bouquet, H.; Brunst, T.; Caldwell, T. S.; Chilingaryan, S.; Choi, W.; Debowski, K.; Deffert, M.; Descher, M.; Barrero, D. Díaz; Doe, P. J.; Dragoun, O.; Drexlin, G.; Dyba, S.; Edzards, F.; Eitel, K.; Ellinger, E.; Engel, R.; Enomoto, S.; Eversheim, D.; Fedkevych, M.; Felden, A.; Formaggio, J. A.; Fränkle, F. M.; Franklin, G. B.; Frankrone, H.; Friedel, F.; Fuchs, D.; Fulst, A.; Gauda, K.; Gil, W.; Glück, F.; Grohmann, S.; Grössle, R.; Gumbsheimer, R.; Hackenjos, M.; Hannen, V.; Hartmann, J.; Haußmann, N.; Minh, M. Ha; Heizmann, F.; Heizmann, J.; Helbing, K.; Hickford, S.; Hillesheimer, D.; Hinz, D.; Höhn, T.; Holzapfel, B.; Holzmann, S.; Houdy, T.; Howe, M. A.; Huber, A.; Jansen, A.; Karl, C.; Kellerer, J.; Kernert, N.; Kippenbrock, L.; Kleesiek, M.; Klein, M.; Köhler, C.; Köllenberger, L.; Kopmann, A.; Korzeczek, M.; Kovalík, A.; Krasch, B.; Krause, H.; Kuffner, B.; Kunka, N.; Lasserre, T.; La Cascio, L.; Lebeda, O.; Lebert, M.; Lehnert, B.; Letnev, J.; Leven, F.; Le, T. L.; Lichter, S.; Lokhov, A.; Machatschek, M.; Malcherek, E.; Mark, M.; Marsteller, A.; Martin, E. L.; Megas, F.; Melzer, C.; Menshikov, A.; Mertens, S.; Meier, M.; Mirz, S.; Monreal, B.; Guzmán, P. I. Morales; Müller, K.; Naumann, U.; Neumann, H.; Niemes, S.; Noe, M.; Off, A.; Ortjohann, H. -W.; Osipowicz, A.; Otten, E.; Parno, D. S.; Pollithy, A.; Poon, A. W. P.; Poyato, J. M. L.; Priester, F.; Ranitzsch, P. C. -O.; Rest, O.; Rinderspacher, R.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rodenbeck, C.; Rohr, P.; Röllig, M.; Röttele, C.; Ryšavý, M.; Sack, R.; Saenz, A.; Schäfer, P.; Schimpf, L.; Schlösser, K.; Schlösser, M.; Schlüter, L.; Schrank, M.; Schulz, B.; Seitz-Moskaliuk, H.; Seller, W.; Sibille, V.; Siegmann, D.; Slezák, M.; Spanier, F.; Steidl, M.; Steven, M.; Sturm, M.; Suesser, M.; Sun, M.; Tcherniakhovski, D.; Telle, H. H.; Thorne, L. A.; Thümmler, T.; Titov, N.; Tkachev, I.; Trost, N.; Urban, K.; Valerius, K.; Vénos, D.; Vianden, R.; Hernández, A. P. Vizcaya; Weber, M.; Weinheimer, C.; Weiss, C.; Welte, S.; Wendel, J.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wolf, J.; Wüstling, S.; Xu, W.; Yen, Y. -R.; Zadorozhny, S.; Zeller, G.
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-09-13
The determination of the neutrino mass is one of the major challenges in astroparticle physics today. Direct neutrino mass experiments, based solely on the kinematics of beta-decay, provide a largely model-independent probe to the neutrino mass scale. The Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino (KATRIN) experiment is designed to directly measure the effective electron antineutrino mass with a sensitivity of 0.2 eV 90% CL. In this work we report on the first operation of KATRIN with tritium which took place in 2018. During this commissioning phase of the tritium circulation system, excellent agreement of the theoretical prediction with the recorded spectra was found and stable conditions over a time period of 13 days could be established. These results are an essential prerequisite for the subsequent neutrino mass measurements with KATRIN in 2019.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1602.04816  [pdf] - 1530478
A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter
Adhikari, R.; Agostini, M.; Ky, N. Anh; Araki, T.; Archidiacono, M.; Bahr, M.; Baur, J.; Behrens, J.; Bezrukov, F.; Dev, P. S. Bhupal; Borah, D.; Boyarsky, A.; de Gouvea, A.; Pires, C. A. de S.; de Vega, H. J.; Dias, A. G.; Di Bari, P.; Djurcic, Z.; Dolde, K.; Dorrer, H.; Durero, M.; Dragoun, O.; Drewes, M.; Drexlin, G.; Düllmann, Ch. E.; Eberhardt, K.; Eliseev, S.; Enss, C.; Evans, N. W.; Faessler, A.; Filianin, P.; Fischer, V.; Fleischmann, A.; Formaggio, J. A.; Franse, J.; Fraenkle, F. M.; Frenk, C. S.; Fuller, G.; Gastaldo, L.; Garzilli, A.; Giunti, C.; Glück, F.; Goodman, M. C.; Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C.; Gorbunov, D.; Hamann, J.; Hannen, V.; Hannestad, S.; Hansen, S. H.; Hassel, C.; Heeck, J.; Hofmann, F.; Houdy, T.; Huber, A.; Iakubovskyi, D.; Ianni, A.; Ibarra, A.; Jacobsson, R.; Jeltema, T.; Jochum, J.; Kempf, S.; Kieck, T.; Korzeczek, M.; Kornoukhov, V.; Lachenmaier, T.; Laine, M.; Langacker, P.; Lasserre, T.; Lesgourgues, J.; Lhuillier, D.; Li, Y. F.; Liao, W.; Long, A. W.; Maltoni, M.; Mangano, G.; Mavromatos, N. E.; Menci, N.; Merle, A.; Mertens, S.; Mirizzi, A.; Monreal, B.; Nozik, A.; Neronov, A.; Niro, V.; Novikov, Y.; Oberauer, L.; Otten, E.; Palanque-Delabrouille, N.; Pallavicini, M.; Pantuev, V. S.; Papastergis, E.; Parke, S.; Pascoli, S.; Pastor, S.; Patwardhan, A.; Pilaftsis, A.; Radford, D. C.; Ranitzsch, P. C. -O.; Rest, O.; Robinson, D. J.; da Silva, P. S. Rodrigues; Ruchayskiy, O.; Sanchez, N. G.; Sasaki, M.; Saviano, N.; Schneider, A.; Schneider, F.; Schwetz, T.; Schönert, S.; Scholl, S.; Shankar, F.; Shrock, R.; Steinbrink, N.; Strigari, L.; Suekane, F.; Suerfu, B.; Takahashi, R.; Van, N. Thi Hong; Tkachev, I.; Totzauer, M.; Tsai, Y.; Tully, C. G.; Valerius, K.; Valle, J. W. F.; Venos, D.; Viel, M.; Vivier, M.; Wang, M. Y.; Weinheimer, C.; Wendt, K.; Winslow, L.; Wolf, J.; Wurm, M.; Xing, Z.; Zhou, S.; Zuber, K.
Comments: v2: 257 pages, 57 figures, content matches published version [JCAP01(2017)025]; over 100 authors from several different communities
Submitted: 2016-02-15, last modified: 2017-02-09
We present a comprehensive review of keV-scale sterile neutrino Dark Matter, collecting views and insights from all disciplines involved - cosmology, astrophysics, nuclear, and particle physics - in each case viewed from both theoretical and experimental/observational perspectives. After reviewing the role of active neutrinos in particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology, we focus on sterile neutrinos in the context of the Dark Matter puzzle. Here, we first review the physics motivation for sterile neutrino Dark Matter, based on challenges and tensions in purely cold Dark Matter scenarios. We then round out the discussion by critically summarizing all known constraints on sterile neutrino Dark Matter arising from astrophysical observations, laboratory experiments, and theoretical considerations. In this context, we provide a balanced discourse on the possibly positive signal from X-ray observations. Another focus of the paper concerns the construction of particle physics models, aiming to explain how sterile neutrinos of keV-scale masses could arise in concrete settings beyond the Standard Model of elementary particle physics. The paper ends with an extensive review of current and future astrophysical and laboratory searches, highlighting new ideas and their experimental challenges, as well as future perspectives for the discovery of sterile neutrinos.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.08316  [pdf] - 1473447
Toward a Zero-Parameter Model for Galaxy Rotation Curve Data
Comments:
Submitted: 2016-08-29
Modeling the luminous mass components of spiral galaxies in standard gravity poses a challenge due to the missing mass problem. However, with the addition of cold dark matter, the missing mass problem can be circumvented at the cost of additional free parameters to the theory. The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) reconsiders how we interpret rotation curve data, such that Doppler-shifted spectra measurements can constrain luminous mass discovery. For a sample of 25 galaxies of varying morphologies and sizes, we demonstrate an ansatz for relative galaxy curvatures that can explain the missing mass. We solve for the LCM free parameter, which we report as a ratio of radial densities of the emitter, to receiver galaxy baryonic mass, to an exponent of $1.63$. Here, we show that this exponent is sensitive to which Milky Way luminous mass model one chooses. We then make a first prediction regarding the Milky Way mass profile in the inner one kpc. Thus, with a bound on the LCM free parameter, we pave the way for future work, where the LCM will tested as a zero-parameter model to predict luminous mass from rotation curve data.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.04587  [pdf] - 1176049
The Luminous Convolution Model for spiral galaxy rotation curves
Comments: This paper substantially expands the results in arXiv:1309.7370 and arXiv:1407:7583
Submitted: 2015-06-15
The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) is an empirical formula, based on a heuristic convolution of Relativistic transformations, which makes it possible to predict the observed rotation curves of a broad class of spiral galaxies from luminous matter alone. Since the LCM is independent of distance estimates or dark matter halo densities, it is the first model of its kind which constrains luminous matter modeling directly from the observed spectral shifts of characteristic photon emission/absorption lines. In this paper we present the LCM solution to a diverse sample of twenty-five (25) galaxies of varying morphologies and sizes. For the chosen sample, it is shown that the LCM is more accurate than either Modified Newtonian Dynamics or dark matter models and returns physically reasonable mass to light ratios and exponential scale lengths. Unlike either Modified Newtonian Dynamics or dark matter models, the LCM predicts something which is directly falsifiable through improvements in our observational capacity, the luminous mass profile. The question, while interesting, of if the LCM constrains the relation of the baryonic to dark matter is beyond the scope of the current work. The focus of this paper is to show that it is possible to describe a broad and diverse spectrum of galaxies efficiently with the LCM formula. Moreover, since the LCM free parameter predicts the ratio of the Milky Way galaxy baryonic mass density to that of the galaxy emitting the photon, if the Milky Way mass models can be trusted at face values, we then show that the LCM becomes a zero parameter model. This paper substantially expands the results in arXiv:1309.7370 and arXiv:1407:7583.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.1914  [pdf] - 1216195
Improving Photoelectron Counting and Particle Identification in Scintillation Detectors with Bayesian Techniques
Comments: 16 pages, 16 figures
Submitted: 2014-08-08, last modified: 2014-12-12
Many current and future dark matter and neutrino detectors are designed to measure scintillation light with a large array of photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). The energy resolution and particle identification capabilities of these detectors depend in part on the ability to accurately identify individual photoelectrons in PMT waveforms despite large variability in pulse amplitudes and pulse pileup. We describe a Bayesian technique that can identify the times of individual photoelectrons in a sampled PMT waveform without deconvolution, even when pileup is present. To demonstrate the technique, we apply it to the general problem of particle identification in single-phase liquid argon dark matter detectors. Using the output of the Bayesian photoelectron counting algorithm described in this paper, we construct several test statistics for rejection of backgrounds for dark matter searches in argon. Compared to simpler methods based on either observed charge or peak finding, the photoelectron counting technique improves both energy resolution and particle identification of low energy events in calibration data from the DEAP-1 detector and simulation of the larger MiniCLEAN dark matter detector.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1407.7583  [pdf] - 857892
The Luminous Convolution Model as an alternative to dark matter in spiral galaxies
Comments: Implications of LCM constraints on populations synthesis modeling are discussed in this paper. This paper substantially expands the results in arxiv:1309.7370
Submitted: 2014-07-28
The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) demonstrates that it is possible to predict the rotation curves of spiral galaxies directly from estimates of the luminous matter. We consider two frame-dependent effects on the light observed from other galaxies: relative velocity and relative curvature. With one free parameter, we predict the rotation curves of twenty-three (23) galaxies represented in forty-two (42) data sets. Relative curvature effects rely upon knowledge of both the gravitational potential from luminous mass of the emitting galaxy and the receiving galaxy, and so each emitter galaxy is compared to four (4) different Milky Way luminous mass models. On average in this sample, the LCM is more successful than either dark matter or modified gravity models in fitting the observed rotation curve data. Implications of LCM constraints on populations synthesis modeling are discussed in this paper. This paper substantially expands the results in arXiv:1309.7370.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1404.0680  [pdf] - 860747
Annual Modulation of Cosmic Relic Neutrinos
Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures
Submitted: 2014-04-02
The cosmic neutrino background (CvB), produced about one second after the Big Bang, permeates the Universe today. New technological advancements make neutrino capture on beta-decaying nuclei (NCB) a clear path forward towards the detection of the CvB. We show that gravitational focusing by the Sun causes the expected neutrino capture rate to modulate annually. The amplitude and phase of the modulation depend on the phase-space distribution of the local neutrino background, which is perturbed by structure formation. These results also apply to searches for sterile neutrinos at NCB experiments. Gravitational focusing is the only source of modulation for neutrino capture experiments, in contrast to dark-matter direct-detection searches where the Earth's time-dependent velocity relative to the Sun also plays a role.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1403.4842  [pdf] - 799232
Update on the MiniCLEAN Dark Matter Experiment
Comments: To appear in the Proceedings of the TAUP 2013 Conference (F. Avignone & W. Haxton, editors, Physics Procedia, Elsevier)
Submitted: 2014-03-19
The direct search for dark matter is entering a period of increased sensitivity to the hypothetical Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP). One such technology that is being examined is a scintillation only noble liquid experiment, MiniCLEAN. MiniCLEAN utilizes over 500 kg of liquid cryogen to detect nuclear recoils from WIMP dark matter and serves as a demonstration for a future detector of order 50 to 100 tonnes. The liquid cryogen is interchangeable between argon and neon to study the A$^{2}$ dependence of the potential signal and examine backgrounds. MiniCLEAN utilizes a unique modular design with spherical geometry to maximize the light yield using cold photomultiplier tubes in a single-phase detector. Pulse shape discrimination techniques are used to separate nuclear recoil signals from electron recoil backgrounds. MiniCLEAN will be spiked with additional $^{39}$Ar to demonstrate the effective reach of the pulse shape discrimination capability. Assembly of the experiment is underway at SNOLAB and an update on the project is given.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.7370  [pdf] - 725728
The Luminous Convolution Model
Comments: 24 pages, 8 figures
Submitted: 2013-09-27
We present a heuristic model for predicting the rotation curves of spiral galaxies. The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) utilizes Lorentz-type transformations of very small changes in photon frequencies from curved space-times to construct a model predictive of galaxy rotation profile observations. These frequency changes are derived from the Schwarzschild red-shift result or the analogous result from a Kerr wave equation. The LCM maps the small curvatures of the emitter galactic frame onto those of the receiver galactic frame, and then returns the map to the associated flat frames where measurements are made. This treatment rests upon estimates of the luminous matter in both the emitter and receiver galaxies to determine these small curvatures. The LCM is tested on a sample of 23 galaxies, represented in 35 different data sets. LCM fits are compared to those of the Navarro, Frenk and White (NFW) Dark Matter Model, and/or to the Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) model when possible. The high degree of sensitivity of the LCM to the initial assumption of a luminous mass-to-light ratio ($M_L/L$) is shown. We demonstrate that the LCM is successful across a wide range of spiral galaxies for predicting the observed rotation curves.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.0910  [pdf] - 1178987
A Search for Astrophysical Burst Signals at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Aharmim, B.; Ahmed, S. N.; Anthony, A. E.; Barros, N.; Beier, E. W.; Bellerive, A.; Beltran, B.; Bergevin, M.; Biller, S. D.; Boudjemline, K.; Boulay, M. G.; Cai, B.; Chan, Y. D.; Chauhan, D.; Chen, M.; Cleveland, B. T.; Cox, G. A.; Dai, X.; Deng, H.; Detwiler, J. A.; DiMarco, M.; Diamond, M. D.; Doe, P. J.; Doucas, G.; Drouin, P. -L.; Duncan, F. A.; Dunford, M.; Earle, E. D.; Elliott, S. R.; Evans, H. C.; Ewan, G. T.; Farine, J.; Fergani, H.; Fleurot, F.; Ford, R. J.; Formaggio, J. A.; Gagnon, N.; Goon, J. TM.; Graham, K.; Guillian, E.; Habib, S.; Hahn, R. L.; Hallin, A. L.; Hallman, E. D.; Harvey, P. J.; Hazama, R.; Heintzelman, W. J.; Heise, J.; Helmer, R. L.; Hime, A.; Howard, C.; Huang, M.; Jagam, P.; Jamieson, B.; Jelley, N. A.; Jerkins, M.; Keeter, K. J.; Klein, J. R.; Kormos, L. L.; Kos, M.; Kraus, C.; Krauss, C. B.; Krueger, A.; Kutter, T.; Kyba, C. C. M.; Lange, R.; Law, J.; Lawson, I. T.; Lesko, K. T.; Leslie, J. R.; Levine, I.; Loach, J. C.; MacLellan, R.; Majerus, S.; Mak, H. B.; Maneira, J.; Martin, R.; McCauley, N.; McDonald, A. B.; McGee, S. R.; Miller, M. L.; Monreal, B.; Monroe, J.; Nickel, B. G.; Noble, A. J.; O'Keeffe, H. M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ollerhead, R. W.; Gann, G. D. Orebi; Oser, S. M.; Ott, R. A.; Peeters, S. J. M.; Poon, A. W. P.; Prior, G.; Reitzner, S. D.; Rielage, K.; Robertson, B. C.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Schwendener, M. H.; Secrest, J. A.; Seibert, S. R.; Simard, O.; Simpson, J. J.; Sinclair, D.; Skensved, P.; Sonley, T. J.; Stonehill, L. C.; Tesic, G.; Tolich, N.; Tsui, T.; Van Berg, R.; VanDevender, B. A.; Virtue, C. J.; Wall, B. L.; Waller, D.; Tseung, H. Wan Chan; Wark, D. L.; Watson, P. J. S.; Wendland, J.; West, N.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wilson, J. R.; Wouters, J. M.; Wright, A.; Yeh, M.; Zhang, F.; Zuber, K.
Comments:
Submitted: 2013-09-04
The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) has confirmed the standard solar model and neutrino oscillations through the observation of neutrinos from the solar core. In this paper we present a search for neutrinos associated with sources other than the solar core, such as gamma-ray bursters and solar flares. We present a new method for looking for temporal coincidences between neutrino events and astrophysical bursts of widely varying intensity. No correlations were found between neutrinos detected in SNO and such astrophysical sources.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1204.5379  [pdf] - 503740
Light Sterile Neutrinos: A White Paper
Abazajian, K. N.; Acero, M. A.; Agarwalla, S. K.; Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A.; Albright, C. H.; Antusch, S.; Arguelles, C. A.; Balantekin, A. B.; Barenboim, G.; Barger, V.; Bernardini, P.; Bezrukov, F.; Bjaelde, O. E.; Bogacz, S. A.; Bowden, N. S.; Boyarsky, A.; Bravar, A.; Berguno, D. Bravo; Brice, S. J.; Bross, A. D.; Caccianiga, B.; Cavanna, F.; Chun, E. J.; Cleveland, B. T.; Collin, A. P.; Coloma, P.; Conrad, J. M.; Cribier, M.; Cucoanes, A. S.; D'Olivo, J. C.; Das, S.; de Gouvea, A.; Derbin, A. V.; Dharmapalan, R.; Diaz, J. S.; Ding, X. J.; Djurcic, Z.; Donini, A.; Duchesneau, D.; Ejiri, H.; Elliott, S. R.; Ernst, D. J.; Esmaili, A.; Evans, J. J.; Fernandez-Martinez, E.; Figueroa-Feliciano, E.; Fleming, B. T.; Formaggio, J. A.; Franco, D.; Gaffiot, J.; Gandhi, R.; Gao, Y.; Garvey, G. T.; Gavrin, V. N.; Ghoshal, P.; Gibin, D.; Giunti, C.; Gninenko, S. N.; Gorbachev, V. V.; Gorbunov, D. S.; Guenette, R.; Guglielmi, A.; Halzen, F.; Hamann, J.; Hannestad, S.; Haxton, W.; Heeger, K. M.; Henning, R.; Hernandez, P.; Huber, P.; Huelsnitz, W.; Ianni, A.; Ibragimova, T. V.; Karadzhov, Y.; Karagiorgi, G.; Keefer, G.; Kim, Y. D.; Kopp, J.; Kornoukhov, V. N.; Kusenko, A.; Kyberd, P.; Langacker, P.; Lasserre, Th.; Laveder, M.; Letourneau, A.; Lhuillier, D.; Li, Y. F.; Lindner, M.; Link, J. M.; Littlejohn, B. L.; Lombardi, P.; Long, K.; Lopez-Pavon, J.; Louis, W. C.; Ludhova, L.; Lykken, J. D.; Machado, P. A. N.; Maltoni, M.; Mann, W. A.; Marfatia, D.; Mariani, C.; Matveev, V. A.; Mavromatos, N. E.; Melchiorri, A.; Meloni, D.; Mena, O.; Mention, G.; Merle, A.; Meroni, E.; Mezzetto, M.; Mills, G. B.; Minic, D.; Miramonti, L.; Mohapatra, D.; Mohapatra, R. N.; Montanari, C.; Mori, Y.; Mueller, Th. A.; Mumm, H. P.; Muratova, V.; Nelson, A. E.; Nico, J. S.; Noah, E.; Nowak, J.; Smirnov, O. Yu.; Obolensky, M.; Pakvasa, S.; Palamara, O.; Pallavicini, M.; Pascoli, S.; Patrizii, L.; Pavlovic, Z.; Peres, O. L. G.; Pessard, H.; Pietropaolo, F.; Pitt, M. L.; Popovic, M.; Pradler, J.; Ranucci, G.; Ray, H.; Razzaque, S.; Rebel, B.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rodejohann, W.; Rountree, S. D.; Rubbia, C.; Ruchayskiy, O.; Sala, P. R.; Scholberg, K.; Schwetz, T.; Shaevitz, M. H.; Shaposhnikov, M.; Shrock, R.; Simone, S.; Skorokhvatov, M.; Sorel, M.; Sousa, A.; Spergel, D. N.; Spitz, J.; Stanco, L.; Stancu, I.; Suzuki, A.; Takeuchi, T.; Tamborra, I.; Tang, J.; Testera, G.; Tian, X. C.; Tonazzo, A.; Tunnell, C. D.; Van de Water, R. G.; Verde, L.; Veretenkin, E. P.; Vignoli, C.; Vivier, M.; Vogelaar, R. B.; Wascko, M. O.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Winter, W.; Wong, Y. Y. Y.; Yanagida, T. T.; Yasuda, O.; Yeh, M.; Yermia, F.; Yokley, Z. W.; Zeller, G. P.; Zhan, L.; Zhang, H.
Comments:
Submitted: 2012-04-18
This white paper addresses the hypothesis of light sterile neutrinos based on recent anomalies observed in neutrino experiments and the latest astrophysical data.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1109.0763  [pdf] - 704596
Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
SNO Collaboration; Aharmim, B.; Ahmed, S. N.; Anthony, A. E.; Barros, N.; Beier, E. W.; Bellerive, A.; Beltran, B.; Bergevin, M.; Biller, S. D.; Boudjemline, K.; Boulay, M. G.; Cai, B.; Chan, Y. D.; Chauhan, D.; Chen, M.; Cleveland, B. T.; Cox, G. A.; Dai, X.; Deng, H.; Detwiler, J. A.; DiMarco, M.; Doe, P. J.; Doucas, G.; Drouin, P. -L.; Duncan, F. A.; Dunford, M.; Earle, E. D.; Elliott, S. R.; Evans, H. C.; Ewan, G. T.; Farine, J.; Fergani, H.; Fleurot, F.; Ford, R. J.; Formaggio, J. A.; Gagnon, N.; Goon, J. TM.; Graham, K.; Guillian, E.; Habib, S.; Hahn, R. L.; Hallin, A. L.; Hallman, E. D.; Harvey, P. J.; Hazama, R.; Heintzelman, W. J.; Heise, J.; Helmer, R. L.; Hime, A.; Howard, C.; Huang, M.; Jagam, P.; Jamieson, B.; Jelley, N. A.; Jerkins, M.; Keeter, K. J.; Klein, J. R.; Kormos, L. L.; Kos, M.; Kraus, C.; Krauss, C. B.; Kruger, A; Kutter, T.; Kyba, C. C. M.; Lange, R.; Law, J.; Lawson, I. T.; Lesko, K. T.; Leslie, J. R.; Loach, J. C.; MacLellan, R.; Majerus, S.; Mak, H. B.; Maneira, J.; Martin, R.; McCauley, N.; McDonald, A. B.; McGee, S. R.; Miller, M. L.; Monreal, B.; Monroe, J.; Nickel, B. G.; Noble, A. J.; O'Keeffe, H. M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ollerhead, R. W.; Gann, G. D. Orebi; Oser, S. M.; Ott, R. A.; Peeters, S. J. M.; Poon, A. W. P.; Prior, G.; Reitzner, S. D.; Rielage, K.; Robertson, B. C.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rosten, R. C.; Schwendener, M. H.; Secrest, J. A.; Seibert, S. R.; Simard, O.; Simpson, J. J.; Skensved, P.; Sonley, T. J.; Stonehill, L. C.; Tešić, G.; Tolich, N.; Tsui, T.; Van Berg, R.; VanDevender, B. A.; Virtue, C. J.; Tseung, H. Wan Chan; Wark, D. L.; Watson, P. J. S.; Wendland, J.; West, N.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wilson, J. R.; Wouters, J. M.; Wright, A.; Yeh, M.; Zhang, F.; Zuber, K.
Comments:
Submitted: 2011-09-04
We report results from a combined analysis of solar neutrino data from all phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. By exploiting particle identification information obtained from the proportional counters installed during the third phase, this analysis improved background rejection in that phase of the experiment. The combined analysis resulted in a total flux of active neutrino flavors from 8B decays in the Sun of (5.25 \pm 0.16(stat.)+0.11-0.13(syst.))\times10^6 cm^{-2}s^{-1}. A two-flavor neutrino oscillation analysis yielded \Deltam^2_{21} = (5.6^{+1.9}_{-1.4})\times10^{-5} eV^2 and tan^2{\theta}_{12}= 0.427^{+0.033}_{-0.029}. A three-flavor neutrino oscillation analysis combining this result with results of all other solar neutrino experiments and the KamLAND experiment yielded \Deltam^2_{21} = (7.41^{+0.21}_{-0.19})\times10^{-5} eV^2, tan^2{\theta}_{12} = 0.446^{+0.030}_{-0.029}, and sin^2{\theta}_{13} = (2.5^{+1.8}_{-1.5})\times10^{-2}. This implied an upper bound of sin^2{\theta}_{13} < 0.053 at the 95% confidence level (C.L.).
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1107.2901  [pdf] - 1077970
Measurement of the $\nu_e$ and Total $^{8}$B Solar Neutrino Fluxes with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Phase-III Data Set
Aharmim, B.; Ahmed, S. N.; Amsbaugh, J. F.; Anaya, J. M.; Anthony, A. E.; Banar, J.; Barros, N.; Beier, E. W.; Bellerive, A.; Beltran, B.; Bergevin, M.; Biller, S. D.; Boudjemline, K.; Boulay, M. G.; Bowles, T. J.; Browne, M. C.; Bullard, T. V.; Burritt, T. H.; Cai, B.; Chan, Y. D.; Chauhan, D.; Chen, M.; Cleveland, B. T.; Cox, G. A.; Currat, C. A.; Dai, X.; Deng, H.; Detwiler, J. A.; DiMarco, M.; Doe, P. J.; Doucas, G.; Dragowsky, M. R.; Drouin, P. -L.; Duba, C. A.; Duncan, F. A.; Dunford, M.; Earle, E. D.; Elliott, S. R.; Evans, H. C.; Ewan, G. T.; Farine, J.; Fergani, H.; Fleurot, F.; Ford, R. J.; Formaggio, J. A.; Fowler, M. M.; Gagnon, N.; Germani, J. V.; Goldschmidt, A.; Goon, J. TM.; Graham, K.; Guillian, E.; Habib, S.; Hahn, R. L.; Hallin, A. L.; Hallman, E. D.; Hamian, A. A.; Harper, G. C.; Harvey, P. J.; Hazama, R.; Heeger, K. M.; Heintzelman, W. J.; Heise, J.; Helmer, R. L.; Henning, R.; Hime, A.; Howard, C.; Howe, M. A.; Huang, M.; Jagam, P.; Jamieson, B.; Jelley, N. A.; Keeter, K. J.; Klein, J. R.; Kormos, L. L.; Kos, M.; Krueger, A.; Kraus, C.; Krauss, C. B.; Kutter, T.; Kyba, C. C. M.; Lange, R.; Law, J.; Lawson, I. T.; Lesko, K. T.; Leslie, J. R.; Loach, J. C.; MacLellan, R.; Majerus, S.; Mak, H. B.; Maneira, J.; Martin, R.; McCauley, N.; McDonald, A. B.; McGee, S. R.; Mifflin, C.; Miller, G. G.; Miller, M. L.; Monreal, B.; Monroe, J.; Morissette, B.; Myers, A. W.; Nickel, B. G.; Noble, A. J.; O'Keeffe, H. M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ollerhead, R. W.; Gann, G. D. Orebi; Oser, S. M.; Ott, R. A.; Peeters, S. J. M.; Poon, A. W. P.; Prior, G.; Reitzner, S. D.; Rielage, K.; Robertson, B. C.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rollin, E.; Schwendener, M. H.; Secrest, J. A.; Seibert, S. R.; Simard, O.; Simpson, J. J.; Skensved, P.; Smith, M. W. E.; Sonley, T. J.; Steiger, T. D.; Stonehill, L. C.; Tesic, G.; Thornewell, P. M.; Tolich, N.; Tsui, T.; Tunnell, C. D.; Van Wechel, T.; Van Berg, R.; VanDevender, B. A.; Virtue, C. J.; Wall, B. L.; Waller, D.; Tseung, H. Wan Chan; Wendland, J.; West, N.; Wilhelmy, J. B.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wilson, J. R.; Wouters, J. M.; Wright, A.; Yeh, M.; Zhang, F.; Zuber, K.
Comments: 104 pages, 26 figures, 20 tables, submitted to Phys. Rev. C
Submitted: 2011-07-14
This paper details the solar neutrino analysis of the 385.17-day Phase-III data set acquired by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO). An array of $^3$He proportional counters was installed in the heavy-water target to measure precisely the rate of neutrino-deuteron neutral-current interactions. This technique to determine the total active $^8$B solar neutrino flux was largely independent of the methods employed in previous phases. The total flux of active neutrinos was measured to be $5.54^{+0.33}_{-0.31}(stat.)^{+0.36}_{-0.34}(syst.)\times 10^{6}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, consistent with previous measurements and standard solar models. A global analysis of solar and reactor neutrino mixing parameters yielded the best-fit values of $\Delta m^2 = 7.59^{+0.19}_{-0.21}\times 10^{-5}{eV}^2$ and $\theta = 34.4^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$ degrees.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1006.1886  [pdf] - 903210
Sensitivity of Neutrino Mass Experiments to the Cosmic Neutrino Background
Comments:
Submitted: 2010-06-09
The KATRIN neutrino experiment is a next-generation tritium beta decay experiment aimed at measuring the mass of the electron neutrino to better than 200 meV at 90% C.L. Due to its intense tritium source, KATRIN can also serve as a possible target for the process of neutrino capture, {\nu}e +3H \to 3He+ + e-. The latter process, possessing no energy threshold, is sensitive to the Cosmic Neutrino Background (C{\nu}B). In this paper, we explore the potential sensitivity of the KATRIN experiment to the relic neutrino density. The KATRIN experiment is sensitive to a C{\nu}B over-density ratio of 2.0x 10^9 over standard concordance model predictions (at 90% C.L.), addressing the validity of certain speculative cosmological models.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:0711.2316  [pdf] - 7061
Spallation nuclei in substellar objects: a new dark-matter signature?
Comments: preprint, 9 pages, 3 figures
Submitted: 2007-11-14
Although dark matter makes up 80% of the gravitational mass of our Galaxy, its composition is not known. One hypothesis is that dark matter consists of massive particles called WIMPs. WIMPs are expected to accumulate and coannihilate in the cores of stars, but the only signature of this accumulation has been thought to be hard- to-observe high-energy neutrinos. Here we propose an entirely new observable signature. WIMP coannihilations in the core of a very low-mass star, brown dwarf, or planetary-mass object should alter the star's chemical composition via spallation reactions. Very close to the Galactic center, these stars may acquire extremely high lithium, beryllium, and boron abundances, even for models with otherwise- undetectable WIMP-nucleon cross sections. These abundances should be measurable in certain stellar systems and phenomena.
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0205035  [pdf] - 114120
Potential for Supernova Neutrino Detection in MiniBooNE
Comments: Added references, version to appear in PRD
Submitted: 2002-05-03, last modified: 2002-07-12
The MiniBooNE detector at Fermilab is designed to search for $\nu_\mu \to \nu_e$ oscillation appearance at $E_\nu \sim 1 {\rm GeV}$ and to make a decisive test of the LSND signal. The main detector (inside a veto shield) is a spherical volume containing 0.680 ktons of mineral oil. This inner volume, viewed by 1280 phototubes, is primarily a \v{C}erenkov medium, as the scintillation yield is low. The entire detector is under a 3 m earth overburden. Though the detector is not optimized for low-energy (tens of MeV) events, and the cosmic-ray muon rate is high (10 kHz), we show that MiniBooNE can function as a useful supernova neutrino detector. Simple trigger-level cuts can greatly reduce the backgrounds due to cosmic-ray muons. For a canonical Galactic supernova at 10 kpc, about 190 supernova $\bar{\nu}_e + p \to e^+ + n$ events would be detected. By adding MiniBooNE to the international network of supernova detectors, the possibility of a supernova being missed would be reduced. Additionally, the paths of the supernova neutrinos through Earth will be different for MiniBooNE and other detectors, thus allowing tests of matter-affected mixing effects on the neutrino signal.