sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Demeautis, C.

Normalized to: Demeautis, C.

2 article(s) in total. 227 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 44,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422  [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.; Ďurech, J.; Oszkiewicz, D. A.; Behrend, R.; Carry, B.; Delbo', M.; Adam, O.; Afonina, V.; Anquetin, R.; Antonini, P.; Arnold, L.; Audejean, M.; Aurard, P.; Bachschmidt, M.; Badue, B.; Barbotin, E.; Barroy, P.; Baudouin, P.; Berard, L.; Berger, N.; Bernasconi, L.; Bosch, J-G.; Bouley, S.; Bozhinova, I.; Brinsfield, J.; Brunetto, L.; Canaud, G.; Caron, J.; Carrier, F.; Casalnuovo, G.; Casulli, S.; Cerda, M.; Chalamet, L.; Charbonnel, S.; Chinaglia, B.; Cikota, A.; Colas, F.; Coliac, J-F.; Collet, A.; Coloma, J.; Conjat, M.; Conseil, E.; Costa, R.; Crippa, R.; Cristofanelli, M.; Damerdji, Y.; Debackere, A.; Decock, A.; Déhais, Q.; Déléage, T.; Delmelle, S.; Demeautis, C.; Dróżdż, M.; Dubos, G.; Dulcamara, T.; Dumont, M.; Durkee, R.; Dymock, R.; del Valle, A. Escalante; Esseiva, N.; Esseiva, R.; Esteban, M.; Fauchez, T.; Fauerbach, M.; Fauvaud, M.; Fauvaud, S.; Forné, E.; Fournel, C.; Fradet, D.; Garlitz, J.; Gerteis, O.; Gillier, C.; Gillon, M.; Giraud, R.; Godard, J-P.; Goncalves, R.; Hamanowa, H.; Hamanowa, H.; Hay, K.; Hellmich, S.; Heterier, S.; Higgins, D.; Hirsch, R.; Hodosan, G.; Hren, M.; Hygate, A.; Innocent, N.; Jacquinot, H.; Jawahar, S.; Jehin, E.; Jerosimic, L.; Klotz, A.; Koff, W.; Korlevic, P.; Kosturkiewicz, E.; Krafft, P.; Krugly, Y.; Kugel, F.; Labrevoir, O.; Lecacheux, J.; Lehký, M.; Leroy, A.; Lesquerbault, B.; Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.; Lutz, M.; Mallecot, B.; Manfroid, J.; Manzini, F.; Marciniak, A.; Martin, A.; Modave, B.; Montaigut, R.; Montier, J.; Morelle, E.; Morton, B.; Mottola, S.; Naves, R.; Nomen, J.; Oey, J.; Ogłoza, W.; Paiella, M.; Pallares, H.; Peyrot, A.; Pilcher, F.; Pirenne, J-F.; Piron, P.; Polinska, M.; Polotto, M.; Poncy, R.; Previt, J. P.; Reignier, F.; Renauld, D.; Ricci, D.; Richard, F.; Rinner, C.; Risoldi, V.; Robilliard, D.; Romeuf, D.; Rousseau, G.; Roy, R.; Ruthroff, J.; Salom, P. A.; Salvador, L.; Sanchez, S.; Santana-Ros, T.; Scholz, A.; Séné, G.; Skiff, B.; Sobkowiak, K.; Sogorb, P.; Soldán, F.; Spiridakis, A.; Splanska, E.; Sposetti, S.; Starkey, D.; Stephens, R.; Stiepen, A.; Stoss, R.; Strajnic, J.; Teng, J-P.; Tumolo, G.; Vagnozzi, A.; Vanoutryve, B.; Vugnon, J. M.; Warner, B. D.; Waucomont, M.; Wertz, O.; Winiarski, M.; Wolf, M.
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e., classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive 3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies, which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission. This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth asteroids.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1301.6943  [pdf] - 620042
Asteroids' physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution
Hanuš, J.; Ďurech, J.; Brož, M.; Marciniak, A.; Warner, B. D.; Pilcher, F.; Stephens, R.; Behrend, R.; Carry, B.; Čapek, D.; Antonini, P.; Audejean, M.; Augustesen, K.; Barbotin, E.; Baudouin, P.; Bayol, A.; Bernasconi, L.; Borczyk, W.; Bosch, J. -G.; Brochard, E.; Brunetto, L.; Casulli, S.; Cazenave, A.; Charbonnel, S.; Christophe, B.; Colas, F.; Coloma, J.; Conjat, M.; Cooney, W.; Correira, H.; Cotrez, V.; Coupier, A.; Crippa, R.; Cristofanelli, M.; Dalmas, Ch.; Danavaro, C.; Demeautis, C.; Droege, T.; Durkee, R.; Esseiva, N.; Esteban, M.; Fagas, M.; Farroni, G.; Fauvaud, M.; Fauvaud, S.; Del Freo, F.; Garcia, L.; Geier, S.; Godon, C.; Grangeon, K.; Hamanowa, H.; Hamanowa, H.; Heck, N.; Hellmich, S.; Higgins, D.; Hirsch, R.; Husarik, M.; Itkonen, T.; Jade, O.; Kamiński, K.; Kankiewicz, P.; Klotz, A.; Koff, R. A.; Kryszczyńska, A.; Kwiatkowski, T.; Laffont, A.; Leroy, A.; Lecacheux, J.; Leonie, Y.; Leyrat, C.; Manzini, F.; Martin, A.; Masi, G.; Matter, D.; Michałowski, J.; Michałowski, M. J.; Michałowski, T.; Michelet, J.; Michelsen, R.; Morelle, E.; Mottola, S.; Naves, R.; Nomen, J.; Oey, J.; Ogloza, W.; Oksanen, A.; Oszkiewicz, D.; Pääkkönen, P.; Paiella, M.; Pallares, H.; Paulo, J.; Pavic, M.; Payet, B.; Polińska, M.; Polishook, D.; Poncy, R.; Revaz, Y.; Rinner, C.; Rocca, M.; Roche, A.; Romeuf, D.; Roy, R.; Saguin, H.; Salom, P. A.; Sanchez, S.; Santacana, G.; Santana-Ros, T.; Sareyan, J. -P.; Sobkowiak, K.; Sposetti, S.; Starkey, D.; Stoss, R.; Strajnic, J.; Teng, J. -P.; Tregon, B.; Vagnozzi, A.; Velichko, F. P.; Waelchli, N.; Wagrez, K.; Wücher, H.
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A, January 15, 2013
Submitted: 2013-01-29
The larger number of models of asteroid shapes and their rotational states derived by the lightcurve inversion give us better insight into both the nature of individual objects and the whole asteroid population. With a larger statistical sample we can study the physical properties of asteroid populations, such as main-belt asteroids or individual asteroid families, in more detail. Shape models can also be used in combination with other types of observational data (IR, adaptive optics images, stellar occultations), e.g., to determine sizes and thermal properties. We use all available photometric data of asteroids to derive their physical models by the lightcurve inversion method and compare the observed pole latitude distributions of all asteroids with known convex shape models with the simulated pole latitude distributions. We used classical dense photometric lightcurves from several sources and sparse-in-time photometry from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff, Catalina Sky Survey, and La Palma surveys (IAU codes 689, 703, 950) in the lightcurve inversion method to determine asteroid convex models and their rotational states. We also extended a simple dynamical model for the spin evolution of asteroids used in our previous paper. We present 119 new asteroid models derived from combined dense and sparse-in-time photometry. We discuss the reliability of asteroid shape models derived only from Catalina Sky Survey data (IAU code 703) and present 20 such models. By using different values for a scaling parameter cYORP (corresponds to the magnitude of the YORP momentum) in the dynamical model for the spin evolution and by comparing synthetics and observed pole-latitude distributions, we were able to constrain the typical values of the cYORP parameter as between 0.05 and 0.6.