Normalized to: DeGrave, K.

**4** article(s) in total. **6** co-authors, from **1** to **3** common article(s). Median position in authors list is **1,0**.

[1] oai:arXiv.org:1807.03841 [pdf] - 1732789

Validating Forward Modeling and Inversions of Helioseismic Holography
Measurements

Comments: accepted for publication by the Astrophysical J

Submitted: **2018-07-10**

Here we use synthetic data to explore the performance of forward models and
inverse methods for helioseismic holography. Specifically, this work presents
the first comprehensive test of inverse modeling for flows using
lateral-vantage (deep-focus) holography. We derive sensitivity functions in the
Born approximation. We then use these sensitivity functions in a series of
forward models and inversions of flows from a publicly available
magnetohydrodynamic quiet-Sun simulation. The forward travel times computed
using the kernels generally compare favorably with measurements obtained by
applying holography, in a lateral-vantage configuration, on a 15-hour time
series of artificial Dopplergrams extracted from the simulation. Inversions for
the horizontal flow components are able to reproduce the flows in the upper 3Mm
of the domain, but are compromised by noise at greater depths.

[2] oai:arXiv.org:1504.01422 [pdf] - 1095664

Helioseismic Investigation of Modeled and Observed Supergranule
Structure

Comments:

Submitted: **2015-04-06**

The subsurface structure of an "average" supergranule is derived from
existing HMI pipeline time-distance data products and compared to the best
helioseismic flow model detailed in Duvall and Hanasoge (2013). We find that
significant differences exist between them. Unlike the shallow structure
predicted by the model, the average HMI supergranule is very extended in depth,
exhibiting horizontal outflow down to $7$--$10$~Mm, followed by a weak inflow
reaching a depth of $\sim20$~Mm below the photosphere. The maximal velocities
in the horizontal direction for the average supergranule are much smaller than
the model, and its near-surface flow field RMS value is about an order of
magnitude smaller than the often-quoted values of
$\sim250-350$~$\rm{m\,s^{-1}}$ for supergranulation. Much of the overall HMI
supergranule structure and its weak flow amplitudes can be explained by
examining the HMI pipeline averaging kernels for the near-surface inversions,
which are found to be very broad in depth, and nearly identical to one another
in terms of sensitivity along the $z$-direction. We also show that
forward-modeled travel times in the Born approximation using the model (derived
from a ray theory approach) are inconsistent with measured travel times for an
average supergranule at any distance. Our findings suggest systematic
inaccuracies in the typical techniques used to study supergranulation,
confirming some of the results in Duvall and Hanasoge (2013).

[3] oai:arXiv.org:1408.2262 [pdf] - 1216215

Time-Distance Helioseismology of Two Realistic Sunspot Simulations

Comments:

Submitted: **2014-08-10**, last modified: **2014-08-14**

Linear time-distance helioseismic inversions are carried out using several
filtering schemes to determine vector flow velocities within two
$\sim100^2\,{\rm Mm^2}\times 20\,{\rm Mm}$ realistic magnetohydrodynamic
sunspot simulations of 25~hr. One simulation domain contains a model of a full
sunspot (i.e. one with both an umbra and penumbra), while the other contains a
pore (i.e. a spot without a penumbra). The goal is to test current helioseismic
methods using these state-of-the-art simulations of magnetic structures. We
find that horizontal flow correlations between inversion and simulation flow
maps are reasonably high ($\sim0.5$--0.8) in the upper 3~Mm at distances
exceeding 25--30~Mm from spot center, but are substantially lower at smaller
distances and larger depths. Inversions of forward-modeled travel times
consistently outperform those of our measured travel times in terms of
horizontal flow correlations, suggesting that our inability to recover flow
structure near these active regions is largely due to the fact that we are
unable to accurately measure travel times near strong magnetic features. In
many cases the velocity amplitudes from the inversions underestimate those of
the simulations by up to 50\%, possibly indicating nonlinearity of the forward
problem. In every case, we find that our inversions are unable to recover the
vertical flow structure of the simulations at any depth.

[4] oai:arXiv.org:1404.4645 [pdf] - 1209038

Validating Time-Distance Helioseismology With Realistic Quiet Sun
Simulations

Comments:

Submitted: **2014-04-17**

Linear time-distance helioseismic inversions are carried out for vector flow
velocities using travel times measured from two $\sim 100^2\,{\rm Mm^2}\times
20\,{\rm Mm}$ realistic magnetohydrodynamic quiet-Sun simulations of about 20
hr. The goal is to test current seismic methods on these state-of-the-art
simulations. Using recent three-dimensional inversion schemes, we find that
inverted horizontal flow maps correlate well with the simulations in the upper
$\sim 3$ Mm of the domains for several filtering schemes, including
phase-speed, ridge, and combined phase-speed and ridge measurements. In several
cases, however, the velocity amplitudes from the inversions severely
underestimate those of the simulations, possibly indicating nonlinearity of the
forward problem. We also find that, while near-surface inversions of the
vertical velocites are best using phase-speed filters, in almost all other
example cases these flows are irretrievable due to noise, suggesting a need for
statistical averaging to obtain better inferences.