Normalized to: Zylberberg, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.1326 [pdf] - 148499
Cosmological Tests of General Relativity with Future Tomographic Surveys
Submitted: 2009-05-11, last modified: 2009-12-04
Future weak lensing surveys will map the evolution of matter perturbations
and gravitational potentials, yielding a new test of general relativity on
cosmic scales. They will probe the relations between matter overdensities,
local curvature, and the Newtonian potential. These relations can be modified
in alternative gravity theories or by the effects of massive neutrinos or
exotic dark energy fluids. We introduce two functions of time and scale which
account for any such modifications in the linear regime. We use a principal
component analysis to find the eigenmodes of these functions that cosmological
data will constrain. The number of constrained modes gives a model-independent
forecast of how many parameters describing deviations from general relativity
could be constrained, along with $w(z)$. The modes' scale and time dependence
tell us which theoretical models will be better tested.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.3791 [pdf] - 16598
Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic surveys
Submitted: 2008-09-23, last modified: 2009-04-13
In alternative theories of gravity, designed to produce cosmic acceleration
at the current epoch, the growth of large scale structure can be modified. We
study the potential of upcoming and future tomographic surveys such as DES and
LSST, with the aid of CMB and supernovae data, to detect departures from the
growth of cosmic structure expected within General Relativity. We employ
parametric forms to quantify the potential time- and scale-dependent variation
of the effective gravitational constant, and the differences between the two
Newtonian potentials. We then apply the Fisher matrix technique to forecast the
errors on the modified growth parameters from galaxy clustering, weak lensing,
CMB, and their cross-correlations across multiple photometric redshift bins. We
find that even with conservative assumptions about the data, DES will produce
non-trivial constraints on modified growth, and that LSST will do significantly
better.