Normalized to: Zoubian, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.02631 [pdf] - 2128527
Euclid preparation: VIII. The Complete Calibration of the
Colour-Redshift Relation survey: VLT/KMOS observations and data release
Euclid Collaboration;
Guglielmo, V.;
Saglia, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Galametz, A.;
Paltani, S.;
Bender, R.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Capak, P.;
Ilbert, O.;
Masters, D. C.;
Stern, D.;
Andreon, S.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R. A.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Casas, S.;
Castellano, M.;
Castignani, G.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gozaliasl, G.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hildebrandt, H.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Maraston, C.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. Benton;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nakajima, R.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Pasian, F.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pocino, A.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Riccio, G.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sanchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespi, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tramacere, A.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Whittaker, L.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2020-07-06
The Complete Calibration of the Colour-Redshift Relation survey (C3R2) is a
spectroscopic effort involving ESO and Keck facilities designed to empirically
calibrate the galaxy colour-redshift relation - P(z|C) to the Euclid depth
(i_AB=24.5) and is intimately linked to upcoming Stage IV dark energy missions
based on weak lensing cosmology. The aim is to build a spectroscopic
calibration sample that is as representative as possible of the galaxies of the
Euclid weak lensing sample. In order to minimise the number of spectroscopic
observations to fill the gaps in current knowledge of the P(z|C),
self-organising map (SOM) representations of the galaxy colour space have been
constructed. Here we present the first results of an ESO@ VLT Large Programme
approved in the context of C3R2, which makes use of the two VLT optical and
near-infrared multi-object spectrographs, FORS2 and KMOS. This paper focuses on
high-quality spectroscopic redshifts of high-z galaxies observed with the KMOS
spectrograph in the H- and K-bands. A total of 424 highly-reliable z are
measured in the 1.3<=z<=2.5 range, with total success rates of 60.7% in the
H-band and 32.8% in the K-band. The newly determined z fill 55% of high and 35%
of lower priority empty SOM grid cells. We measured Halpha fluxes in a 1."2
radius aperture from the spectra of the spectroscopically confirmed galaxies
and converted them into star formation rates. In addition, we performed an SED
fitting analysis on the same sample in order to derive stellar masses, E(B-V),
total magnitudes, and SFRs. We combine the results obtained from the spectra
with those derived via SED fitting, and we show that the spectroscopic failures
come from either weakly star-forming galaxies (at z<1.7, i.e. in the H-band) or
low S/N spectra (in the K-band) of z>2 galaxies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.07676 [pdf] - 2084011
Euclid: Nonparametric point spread function field recovery through
interpolation on a graph Laplacian
Schmitz, M. A.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Mboula, F. Ngole;
Auricchio, N.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Capobianco, R. I. Vito;
Clédassou, R.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Garilli, B.;
Hormuth, F.;
Hu, D.;
Israel, H.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Mansutti, O.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R. J.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J. D.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Saglia, R. P.;
Schneider, P.;
Serrano, S.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vuerli, C.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2019-06-17, last modified: 2020-04-27
Context. Future weak lensing surveys, such as the Euclid mission, will
attempt to measure the shapes of billions of galaxies in order to derive
cosmological information. These surveys will attain very low levels of
statistical error, and systematic errors must be extremely well controlled. In
particular, the point spread function (PSF) must be estimated using stars in
the field, and recovered with high accuracy.
Aims. The aims of this paper are twofold. Firstly, we took steps toward a
nonparametric method to address the issue of recovering the PSF field, namely
that of finding the correct PSF at the position of any galaxy in the field,
applicable to Euclid. Our approach relies solely on the data, as opposed to
parametric methods that make use of our knowledge of the instrument. Secondly,
we studied the impact of imperfect PSF models on the shape measurement of
galaxies themselves, and whether common assumptions about this impact hold true
in an Euclid scenario.
Methods. We extended the recently proposed resolved components analysis
approach, which performs super-resolution on a field of under-sampled
observations of a spatially varying, image-valued function. We added a spatial
interpolation component to the method, making it a true 2-dimensional PSF
model. We compared our approach to PSFEx, then quantified the impact of PSF
recovery errors on galaxy shape measurements through image simulations.
Results. Our approach yields an improvement over PSFEx in terms of the PSF
model and on observed galaxy shape errors, though it is at present far from
reaching the required Euclid accuracy. We also find that the usual formalism
used for the propagation of PSF model errors to weak lensing quantities no
longer holds in the case of an Euclid-like PSF. In particular, different shape
measurement approaches can react differently to the same PSF modeling errors.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.07326 [pdf] - 2085090
Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage
IV cosmic shear experiments
Deshpande, A. C.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Taylor, P. L.;
Casas, S.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J. L.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2019-12-16, last modified: 2020-04-01
Stage IV weak lensing experiments will offer more than an order of magnitude
leap in precision. We must therefore ensure that our analyses remain accurate
in this new era. Accordingly, previously ignored systematic effects must be
addressed. In this work, we evaluate the impact of the reduced shear
approximation and magnification bias, on the information obtained from the
angular power spectrum. To first-order, the statistics of reduced shear, a
combination of shear and convergence, are taken to be equal to those of shear.
However, this approximation can induce a bias in the cosmological parameters
that can no longer be neglected. A separate bias arises from the statistics of
shear being altered by the preferential selection of galaxies and the dilution
of their surface densities, in high-magnification regions. The corrections for
these systematic effects take similar forms, allowing them to be treated
together. We calculated the impact of neglecting these effects on the
cosmological parameters that would be determined from Euclid, using cosmic
shear tomography. To do so, we employed the Fisher matrix formalism, and
included the impact of the super-sample covariance. We also demonstrate how the
reduced shear correction can be calculated using a lognormal field forward
modelling approach. These effects cause significant biases in Omega_m, sigma_8,
n_s, Omega_DE, w_0, and w_a of -0.53 sigma, 0.43 sigma, -0.34 sigma, 1.36
sigma, -0.68 sigma, and 1.21 sigma, respectively. We then show that these
lensing biases interact with another systematic: the intrinsic alignment of
galaxies. Accordingly, we develop the formalism for an intrinsic
alignment-enhanced lensing bias correction. Applying this to Euclid, we find
that the additional terms introduced by this correction are sub-dominant.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.07367 [pdf] - 2077067
Euclid: The selection of quiescent and star-forming galaxies using
observed colours
Bisigello, L.;
Kuchner, U.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Andreon, S.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Duc, P. -A.;
Garilli, B.;
Humphrey, A.;
Maraston, C.;
Moresco, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Tortora, C.;
Zamorani, G.;
Auricchio, N.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Cropper, M. S.;
Dusini, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Masters, D. C.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Meylan, G.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sauvage, M.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-03-16
The Euclid mission will observe well over a billion galaxies out to $z\sim6$
and beyond. This will offer an unrivalled opportunity to investigate several
key questions for understanding galaxy formation and evolution. The first step
for many of these studies will be the selection of a sample of quiescent and
star-forming galaxies, as is often done in the literature by using well known
colour techniques such as the `UVJ' diagram. However, given the limited number
of filters available for the Euclid telescope, the recovery of such rest-frame
colours will be challenging. We therefore investigate the use of observed
Euclid colours, on their own and together with ground-based u-band
observations, for selecting quiescent and star-forming galaxies. The most
efficient colour combination, among the ones tested in this work, consists of
the (u-VIS) and (VIS-J) colours. We find that this combination allows users to
select a sample of quiescent galaxies complete to above $\sim70\%$ and with
less than 15$\%$ contamination at redshifts in the range $0.75<z<1$. For
galaxies at high-z or without the u-band complementary observations, the
(VIS-Y) and (J-H) colours represent a valid alternative, with $>65\%$
completeness level and contamination below 20$\%$ at $1<z<2$ for finding
quiescent galaxies. In comparison, the sample of quiescent galaxies selected
with the traditional UVJ technique is only $\sim20\%$ complete at $z<3$, when
recovering the rest-frame colours using mock Euclid observations. This shows
that our new methodology is the most suitable one when only Euclid bands, along
with u-band imaging, are available.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.04310 [pdf] - 1994125
Euclid preparation: V. Predicted yield of redshift 7<z<9 quasars from
the wide survey
Euclid Collaboration;
Barnett, R.;
Warren, S. J.;
Mortlock, D. J.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Conselice, C.;
Hewett, P. C.;
Willott, C. J.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Clédassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dusini, S.;
Ealet, A.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mansutti, O.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S. M.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Paykari, P.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pettorino, V.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-08-12, last modified: 2019-11-05
We provide predictions of the yield of $7<z<9$ quasars from the Euclid wide
survey, updating the calculation presented in the Euclid Red Book in several
ways. We account for revisions to the Euclid near-infrared filter wavelengths;
we adopt steeper rates of decline of the quasar luminosity function (QLF;
$\Phi$) with redshift, $\Phi\propto10^{k(z-6)}$, $k=-0.72$, and a further
steeper rate of decline, $k=-0.92$; we use better models of the contaminating
populations (MLT dwarfs and compact early-type galaxies); and we use an
improved Bayesian selection method, compared to the colour cuts used for the
Red Book calculation, allowing the identification of fainter quasars, down to
$J_{AB}\sim23$. Quasars at $z>8$ may be selected from Euclid $OYJH$ photometry
alone, but selection over the redshift interval $7<z<8$ is greatly improved by
the addition of $z$-band data from, e.g., Pan-STARRS and LSST. We calculate
predicted quasar yields for the assumed values of the rate of decline of the
QLF beyond $z=6$. For the case that the decline of the QLF accelerates beyond
$z=6$, with $k=-0.92$, Euclid should nevertheless find over 100 quasars with
$7.0<z<7.5$, and $\sim25$ quasars beyond the current record of $z=7.5$,
including $\sim8$ beyond $z=8.0$. The first Euclid quasars at $z>7.5$ should be
found in the DR1 data release, expected in 2024. It will be possible to
determine the bright-end slope of the QLF, $7<z<8$, $M_{1450}<-25$, using 8m
class telescopes to confirm candidates, but follow-up with JWST or E-ELT will
be required to measure the faint-end slope. Contamination of the candidate
lists is predicted to be modest even at $J_{AB}\sim23$. The precision with
which $k$ can be determined over $7<z<8$ depends on the value of $k$, but
assuming $k=-0.72$ it can be measured to a 1 sigma uncertainty of 0.07.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.10521 [pdf] - 2068949
Euclid preparation: VI. Verifying the Performance of Cosmic Shear
Experiments
Euclid Collaboration;
Paykari, P.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Azzollini, R.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Cropper, M.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Kannawadi, A.;
Miller, L.;
Aussel, H.;
Conti, I. F.;
Auricchio, N.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Borsato, E.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Charles, Y.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Fabbian, G.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gracia-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hormuth, F.;
Ilic, S.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Laureijs, R.;
Mignant, D. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martinet, N.;
Massey, F. Marulli R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Schrabback, T.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Taylor, A.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vannier, M.;
Vassallo, T.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-23
Our aim is to quantify the impact of systematic effects on the inference of
cosmological parameters from cosmic shear. We present an end-to-end approach
that introduces sources of bias in a modelled weak lensing survey on a
galaxy-by-galaxy level. Residual biases are propagated through a pipeline from
galaxy properties (one end) through to cosmic shear power spectra and
cosmological parameter estimates (the other end), to quantify how imperfect
knowledge of the pipeline changes the maximum likelihood values of dark energy
parameters. We quantify the impact of an imperfect correction for charge
transfer inefficiency (CTI) and modelling uncertainties of the point spread
function (PSF) for Euclid, and find that the biases introduced can be corrected
to acceptable levels.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273 [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological
probes
Euclid Collaboration;
Blanchard, A.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Casas, S.;
Ilić, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Linder, E.;
Majerotto, E.;
Markovič, K.;
Martinelli, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Andreon, S.;
Aussel, H.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Ducret, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gómez-Alvarez, P.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Racca, G. D.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes;
Viel, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies
to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic
structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms
of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on
different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different
observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present
validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise
for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community
with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We
describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied
to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the
required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their
development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations,
reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less
than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on
the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their
own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We
find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining
freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different
cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be
reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a
pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of
cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological
constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at
least a factor of three.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.1523 [pdf] - 936215
The 0.1<z<1.65 evolution of the bright end of the [OII] luminosity
function
Comparat, Johan;
Richard, Johan;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Ilbert, Olivier;
Gonzalez-Perez, V.;
Tresse, Laurence;
Zoubian, Julien;
Arnouts, Stephane;
Bacon, Roland;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Baugh, Carlton;
Delubac, Timothee;
Ealet, Anne;
Escoffier, Stephanie;
Ge, Jian;
Jullo, Eric;
Lacey, Cedric;
Ross, Nicholas P.;
Schlegel, David;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Steele, Oliver;
Tasca, Lidia;
Yeche, Christophe;
Lesser, Michael;
Jiang, Zhaoji;
Jing, Yipeng;
Fan, Zhou;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Ma, Jun;
Nie, Jundan;
Wang, Jiali;
Wu, Zhenyu;
Zhang, Tianmeng;
Zhou, Xu;
Zhou, Zhimin;
Zou, Hu
Submitted: 2014-08-07, last modified: 2014-12-19
We present the [OII] luminosity function measured in the redshift range
0.1<z<1.65 with unprecedented depth and accuracy. Our measurements are based on
medium resolution flux-calibrated spectra of emission line galaxies with the
FORS2 instrument at VLT and with the SDSS-III/BOSS spectrograph. The FORS2
spectra and the corresponding catalog containing redshifts and line fluxes are
released along with this paper.
In this work we use a novel method to combine the aforementioned surveys with
GAMA, zCOSMOS and VVDS, which have different target selection, producing a
consistent weighting scheme to derive the [OII] luminosity function.
The measured luminosity function is in good agreement with previous
independent estimates. The comparison with two state-of-the-art semi-analytical
models is good, which is encouraging for the production of mock catalogs of
[OII] flux limited surveys. We observe the bright end evolution over 8.5 Gyr:
we measure the decrease of log L* from 42.4 erg/s at redshift 1.44 to 41.2 at
redshift 0.165 and we find that the faint end slope flattens when redshift
decreases.
This measurement confirms the feasibility of the target selection of future
baryonic acoustic oscillation surveys aiming at observing [OII] flux limited
samples.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.2461 [pdf] - 654262
The ELG target selection with the BOSS survey
Submitted: 2013-01-11, last modified: 2013-04-19
The Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) feature in the power spectrum of
galaxies can be used as a standard ruler to probe the accelerated expansion of
the Universe. In this paper, we study several galaxy selection schemes aiming
at building an emission-line galaxy (ELG) sample in the redshift range $0.6 < z
< 1.7$, that would be suitable for future BAO studies using the Baryonic
Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) spectrograph on the Sloan Digital Sky
Survey (SDSS) telescope. We explore two different color selections using both
the SDSS and the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS)
photometry in the $u, g, r, i$ bands and evaluate their performance for
selecting bright ELG. This study confirms the feasibility of massive ELG
surveys using the BOSS spectrographs on the SDSS telescope for a BAO detection
at redshift $z\sim1$, in particular for the proposed eBOSS experiment.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.4321 [pdf] - 619484
Investigating Emission Line Galaxy Surveys with the Sloan Digital Sky
Survey Telescope
Comparat, Johan;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Escoffier, Stephanie;
Zoubian, Julien;
Ealet, Anne;
Lamareille, Fabrice;
Mostek, N.;
Steele, Oliver;
Aubourg, Eric;
Bailey, Stephen;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Brownstein, Joel;
Dawson, Kyle;
Ge, Jian;
Ilbert, Olivier;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
Maraston, Claudia;
Percival, Will;
Ross, Nicholas P.;
Schimd, Carlo;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Thomas, Daniel;
Tinker, Jeremy L.;
Weaver, Benjamin A.
Submitted: 2012-07-18, last modified: 2012-10-03
The Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) feature in the power spectrum of
galaxies provides a standard ruler to probe the accelerated expansion of the
Universe. The current surveys covering a comoving volume sufficient to unveil
the BAO scale are limited to redshift $z \lesssim 0.7$. In this paper, we study
several galaxy selection schemes aiming at building an emission-line-galaxy
(ELG) sample in the redshift range $0.6<z<1.7$, that would be suitable for
future BAO studies using the Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS)
spectrograph on the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) telescope. We explore two
different colour selections using both the SDSS and the Canada France Hawai
Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHT-LS) photometry in the u, g, r, and i bands and
evaluate their performance selecting luminous ELG. From about 2,000 ELG, we
identified a selection scheme that has a 75 percent redshift measurement
efficiency. This result confirms the feasibility of massive ELG surveys using
the BOSS spectrograph on the SDSS telescope for a BAO detection at redshift
$z\sim1$, in particular the proposed eBOSS experiment, which plans to use the
SDSS telescope to combine the use of the BAO ruler with redshift space
distortions using emission line galaxies and quasars in the redshift
$0.6<z<2.2$.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1204.5151 [pdf] - 503259
The WFIRST Galaxy Survey Exposure Time Calculator
Submitted: 2012-04-23
This document describes the exposure time calculator for the Wide-Field
Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) high-latitude survey. The calculator works
in both imaging and spectroscopic modes. In addition to the standard ETC
functions (e.g. background and S/N determination), the calculator integrates
over the galaxy population and forecasts the density and redshift distribution
of galaxy shapes usable for weak lensing (in imaging mode) and the detected
emission lines (in spectroscopic mode). The source code is made available for
public use.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.3193 [pdf] - 429544
Euclid Definition Study Report
Laureijs, R.;
Amiaux, J.;
Arduini, S.;
Auguères, J. -L.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Cole, R.;
Cropper, M.;
Dabin, C.;
Duvet, L.;
Ealet, A.;
Garilli, B.;
Gondoin, P.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoar, J.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Holmes, R.;
Kitching, T.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Mellier, Y.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W.;
Rhodes, J.;
Criado, G. Saavedra;
Sauvage, M.;
Scaramella, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Warren, S.;
Bender, R.;
Castander, F.;
Cimatti, A.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Levi, M.;
Lilje, P.;
Meylan, G.;
Nichol, R.;
Pedersen, K.;
Popa, V.;
Lopez, R. Rebolo;
Rix, H. -W.;
Rottgering, H.;
Zeilinger, W.;
Grupp, F.;
Hudelot, P.;
Massey, R.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Miller, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Paulin-Henriksson, S.;
Pires, S.;
Saxton, C.;
Schrabback, T.;
Seidel, G.;
Walsh, J.;
Aghanim, N.;
Amendola, L.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Benabed, K.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Elbaz, D.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gavazzi, G.;
Helmi, A.;
Hook, I.;
Irwin, M.;
Kneib, J. -P.;
Kunz, M.;
Mannucci, F.;
Moscardini, L.;
Tao, C.;
Teyssier, R.;
Weller, J.;
Zamorani, G.;
Osorio, M. R. Zapatero;
Boulade, O.;
Foumond, J. J.;
Di Giorgio, A.;
Guttridge, P.;
James, A.;
Kemp, M.;
Martignac, J.;
Spencer, A.;
Walton, D.;
Blümchen, T.;
Bonoli, C.;
Bortoletto, F.;
Cerna, C.;
Corcione, L.;
Fabron, C.;
Jahnke, K.;
Ligori, S.;
Madrid, F.;
Martin, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Pamplona, T.;
Prieto, E.;
Riva, M.;
Toledo, R.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Zerbi, F.;
Abdalla, F.;
Douspis, M.;
Grenet, C.;
Borgani, S.;
Bouwens, R.;
Courbin, F.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Dubath, P.;
Fontana, A.;
Frailis, M.;
Grazian, A.;
Koppenhöfer, J.;
Mansutti, O.;
Melchior, M.;
Mignoli, M.;
Mohr, J.;
Neissner, C.;
Noddle, K.;
Poncet, M.;
Scodeggio, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Shane, N.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Surace, C.;
Taylor, A.;
Verdoes-Kleijn, G.;
Vuerli, C.;
Williams, O. R.;
Zacchei, A.;
Altieri, B.;
Sanz, I. Escudero;
Kohley, R.;
Oosterbroek, T.;
Astier, P.;
Bacon, D.;
Bardelli, S.;
Baugh, C.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Bianchi, D.;
Biviano, A.;
Branchini, E.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V.;
Clements, D.;
Colombi, S.;
Conselice, C.;
Cresci, G.;
Deacon, N.;
Dunlop, J.;
Fedeli, C.;
Fontanot, F.;
Franzetti, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gow, J.;
Heavens, A.;
Hewett, P.;
Heymans, C.;
Holland, A.;
Huang, Z.;
Ilbert, O.;
Joachimi, B.;
Jennins, E.;
Kerins, E.;
Kiessling, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kotak, R.;
Krause, O.;
Lahav, O.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lombardi, M.;
Magliocchetti, M.;
Maguire, K.;
Majerotto, E.;
Maoli, R.;
Marulli, F.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCracken, H.;
McLure, R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Merson, A.;
Moresco, M.;
Nonino, M.;
Norberg, P.;
Peacock, J.;
Pello, R.;
Penny, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Di Porto, C.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Radovich, M.;
Rassat, A.;
Roche, N.;
Ronayette, S.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schneider, P.;
Semboloni, E.;
Serjeant, S.;
Simpson, F.;
Skordis, C.;
Smadja, G.;
Smartt, S.;
Spano, P.;
Spiro, S.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tilquin, A.;
Trotta, R.;
Verde, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Williger, G.;
Zhao, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2011-10-14
Euclid is a space-based survey mission from the European Space Agency
designed to understand the origin of the Universe's accelerating expansion. It
will use cosmological probes to investigate the nature of dark energy, dark
matter and gravity by tracking their observational signatures on the geometry
of the universe and on the cosmic history of structure formation. The mission
is optimised for two independent primary cosmological probes: Weak
gravitational Lensing (WL) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). The Euclid
payload consists of a 1.2 m Korsch telescope designed to provide a large field
of view. It carries two instruments with a common field-of-view of ~0.54 deg2:
the visual imager (VIS) and the near infrared instrument (NISP) which contains
a slitless spectrometer and a three bands photometer. The Euclid wide survey
will cover 15,000 deg2 of the extragalactic sky and is complemented by two 20
deg2 deep fields. For WL, Euclid measures the shapes of 30-40 resolved galaxies
per arcmin2 in one broad visible R+I+Z band (550-920 nm). The photometric
redshifts for these galaxies reach a precision of dz/(1+z) < 0.05. They are
derived from three additional Euclid NIR bands (Y, J, H in the range 0.92-2.0
micron), complemented by ground based photometry in visible bands derived from
public data or through engaged collaborations. The BAO are determined from a
spectroscopic survey with a redshift accuracy dz/(1+z) =0.001. The slitless
spectrometer, with spectral resolution ~250, predominantly detects Ha emission
line galaxies. Euclid is a Medium Class mission of the ESA Cosmic Vision
2015-2025 programme, with a foreseen launch date in 2019. This report (also
known as the Euclid Red Book) describes the outcome of the Phase A study.