sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Zou, Jin-Hang

Normalized to: Zou, J.

6 article(s) in total. 218 co-authors, from 1 to 7 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 7,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.15386  [pdf] - 2129460
Search For Electron-Antineutrinos Associated With Gravitational-Wave Events GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and GW170817 at Daya Bay
An, F. P.; Balantekin, A. B.; Band, H. R.; Bishai, M.; Blyth, S.; Cao, G. F.; Cao, J.; Chang, J. F.; Chang, Y.; Chen, H. S.; Chen, S. M.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y. X.; Cheng, J.; Cheng, Z. K.; Cherwinka, J. J.; Chu, M. C.; Cummings, J. P.; Dalager, O.; Deng, F. S.; Ding, Y. Y.; Diwan, M. V.; Dohnal, T.; Dove, J.; Dvorak, M.; Dwyer, D. A.; Gallo, J. P.; Gonchar, M.; Gong, G. H.; Gong, H.; Gu, W. Q.; Guo, J. Y.; Guo, L.; Guo, X. H.; Guo, Y. H.; Guo, Z.; Hackenburg, R. W.; Hans, S.; He, M.; Heeger, K. M.; Heng, Y. K.; Higuera, A.; Hor, Y. K.; Hsiung, Y. B.; Hu, B. Z.; Hu, J. R.; Hu, T.; Hu, Z. J.; Huang, H. X.; Huang, X. T.; Huang, Y. B.; Huber, P.; Jaffe, D. E.; Jen, K. L.; Ji, X. L.; Ji, X. P.; Johnson, R. A.; Jones, D.; Kang, L.; Kettell, S. H.; Kohn, S.; Kramer, M.; Langford, T. J.; Lee, J.; Lee, J. H. C.; Lei, R. T.; Leitner, R.; Leung, J. K. C.; Li, F.; Li, J. J.; Li, Q. J.; Li, S.; Li, S. C.; Li, W. D.; Li, X. N.; Li, X. Q.; Li, Y. F.; Li, Z. B.; Liang, H.; Lin, C. J.; Lin, G. L.; Lin, S.; Ling, J. J.; Link, J. M.; Littenberg, L.; Littlejohn, B. R.; Liu, J. C.; Liu, J. L.; Lu, C.; Lu, H. Q.; Lu, J. S.; Luk, K. B.; Ma, X. B.; Ma, X. Y.; Ma, Y. Q.; Marshall, C.; Caicedo, D. A. Martinez; McDonald, K. T.; McKeown, R. D.; Meng, Y.; Napolitano, J.; Naumov, D.; Naumova, E.; Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P.; Olshevskiy, A.; Pan, H. -R.; Park, J.; Patton, S.; Peng, J. C.; Pun, C. S. J.; Qi, F. Z.; Qi, M.; Qian, X.; Raper, N.; Ren, J.; Reveco, C. Morales; Rosero, R.; Roskovec, B.; Ruan, X. C.; Steiner, H.; Sun, J. L.; Tmej, T.; Treskov, K.; Tse, W. -H.; Tull, C. E.; Viren, B.; Vorobel, V.; Wang, C. H.; Wang, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, N. Y.; Wang, R. G.; Wang, W.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. F.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z. M.; Wei, H. Y.; Wei, L. H.; Wen, L. J.; Whisnant, K.; White, C. G.; Wong, H. L. H.; Worcester, E.; Wu, D. R.; Wu, F. L.; Wu, Q.; Wu, W. J.; Xia, D. M.; Xie, Z. Q.; Xing, Z. Z.; Xu, J. L.; Xu, T.; Xue, T.; Yang, C. G.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y. Z.; Yao, H. F.; Ye, M.; Yeh, M.; Young, B. L.; Yu, H. Z.; Yu, Z. Y.; Yue, B. B.; Zeng, S.; Zeng, Y.; Zhan, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, F. Y.; Zhang, H. H.; Zhang, J. W.; Zhang, Q. M.; Zhang, X. T.; Zhang, Y. M.; Zhang, Y. X.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Zhang, Z. J.; Zhang, Z. P.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhuang, H. L.; Zou, J. H.
Comments: 14 pages, 12 figures, 8 tables
Submitted: 2020-06-27, last modified: 2020-07-07
Providing a possible connection between neutrino emission and gravitational-wave (GW) bursts is important to our understanding of the physical processes that occur when black holes or neutron stars merge. In the Daya Bay experiment, using data collected from December 2011 to August 2017, a search has been performed for electron-antineutrino signals coinciding with detected GW events, including GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and GW170817. We used three time windows of $\mathrm{\pm 10~s}$, $\mathrm{\pm 500~s}$, and $\mathrm{\pm 1000~s}$ relative to the occurrence of the GW events, and a neutrino energy range of 1.8 to 100 MeV to search for correlated neutrino candidates. The detected electron-antineutrino candidates are consistent with the expected background rates for all the three time windows. Assuming monochromatic spectra, we found upper limits (90% confidence level) on electron-antineutrino fluence of $(1.13~-~2.44) \times 10^{11}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ at 5 MeV to $8.0 \times 10^{7}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ at 100 MeV for the three time windows. Under the assumption of a Fermi-Dirac spectrum, the upper limits were found to be $(5.4~-~7.0)\times 10^{9}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ for the three time windows.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2007.01124  [pdf] - 2126906
Evidence for gravitational-wave dominated emission in the central engine of short GRB 200219A
Comments: 21 pages, 2 Tables, 7 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ Letters
Submitted: 2020-06-30
GRB 200219A is a short gamma-ray burst (GRB) with an extended emission (EE) lasting $\sim 90$s. By analyzing data observed with the {\em Swift}/BAT and {\em Fermi}/GBM, we find that a cutoff power law (CPL) model can adequately well fit the spectra of the initial short pulse with $\rm E_{p}=1387^{+232}_{-134}$ keV. More interestingly, together with the EE component and early X-ray data, it exhibits a plateau emission smoothly connected with a $\sim t^{-1}$ segment, and followed by an extremely steep decay. The short GRB composed of those three segments is unique in the {\em Swift} era, and is very difficult to explain with the standard internal/external shock model of a black hole central engine, but could be consistent with the prediction of a magnetar central engine from the merger of an NS binary. We suggest that the plateau emission followed by a $\sim t^{-1}$ decay phase is powered by the spin-down of millisecond magnetar, which loses its rotation energy via GW quadrupole radiation. Then, the abrupt drop decay is caused by magnetar collapsing into black hole before switching to the EM-dominated emission. This is the first short GRB for which the X-ray emission has such an intriguing feature powered by magnetar via GW-dominated radiation. If this is the case, one can estimate the physical parameters of a magnetar, the GW signal powered by magnetar and the merger-nova emission are also discussed.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.00375  [pdf] - 2122014
Physical Implications of the Sub-threshold GRB GBM-190816 and its Associated Sub-threshold Gravitational Wave Event
Comments: 23 pages, 12 figures. Accepted by ApJ
Submitted: 2019-12-01, last modified: 2020-06-25
The LIGO-Virgo and Fermi collaborations recently reported a possible joint detection of a sub-threshold gravitational wave (GW) event and a sub-threshold gamma-ray burst (GRB), GBM-190816, that occurred 1.57 s after the merger. We perform an independent analysis of the publicly available data and investigate the physical implications of this potential association. By carefully studying the following properties of GBM-190816 using Fermi/GBM data, including signal-to-noise ratio, duration, f-parameter, spectral properties, energetic properties, and its compliance with some GRB statistical correlations, we confirm that this event is likely a typical short GRB. Assuming its association with the sub-threshold GW event, the inferred luminosity is $1.47_{-1.04}^{+3.40} \times 10^{49}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Based on the available information of the sub-threshold GW event, we infer the mass ratio q of the compact binary as $q=2.26_{-1.43}^{+2.75}$ according to the reported range of luminosity distance. If the heavier compact object has a mass > 3 solar masses, q can be further constrained to $q=2.26_{-0.12}^{+2.75}$. The leading physical scenario invokes an NS-BH merger system with the NS tidally disrupted. Within this scenario, we constrain the physical properties of such a system to produce a GRB. The GW data may also allow an NS-BH system with no tidal disruption of the NS or a BH-BH merger. We apply the charged compact binary coalescence (cCBC) theory (for both a constant charge and an increasing charge for the merging members) to derive the model parameters to account for GBM-190816 and found that the required parameters are extreme. Finally, we argue that the fact that the observed GW-GRB delay time scale is comparable to that of GW170817/GRB 170817A suggests that the GW-GRB time delay of these two cases is mainly defined by the time scale for the jet to propagate to the GRB emission site.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.11479  [pdf] - 2102959
Stringent upper limits on pulsed radio emission during an active bursting phase of the Galactic magnetar SGRJ1935+2154
Comments: 28 pages, 7 figures, This version submitted to Nature. Subject to press embargo
Submitted: 2020-05-23, last modified: 2020-05-27
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are mysterious millisecond-duration radio transients observed from extragalactic distances. Magnetars have been long speculated as the possible engine to power repeating bursts from FRB sources, but no convincing evidence has been collected so far. Recently, a Galactic magnetar dubbed Soft Gamma-ray Repeater (SGR) J1935+2154 entered an active phase by emitting intense soft gamma-ray bursts. One fast radio burst with two peaks (hereafter FRB 200428) and a luminosity comparable to those of extragalactic FRBs was detected from the source in association with a soft $\gamma$-ray / hard X-ray flare. Here we report an eight-hour targeted observational campaign with the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) in four observing sessions, assisted by multi-wavelength (optical and hard X-rays) observations. During the third session, twenty-nine SGR bursts were detected by the {\it Fermi} Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM). Throughout the observing period, especially during the scrutinized epochs when SGR bursts reached the Earth, no single dispersed pulsed emission was detected by FAST. This places a fluence upper limit eight orders of magnitude deeper than the fluence of FRB 200428. Our results suggest that FRB -- SGR burst associations are rather rare. FRBs may be highly relativistic and geometrically beamed or may carry narrow spectra with the characteristic frequencies of the most bursts far outside the FAST band. More intriguingly, it is also possible that the physical condition to achieve coherent radiation in SGR bursts is contrived. Only under extreme conditions could an FRB be made in association with an SGR burst.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.12173  [pdf] - 1994260
CDF-S XT1 and XT2: White Dwarf Tidal Disruption Events by Intermediate-Mass Black Holes?
Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication in APJL
Submitted: 2019-09-26, last modified: 2019-09-27
Recently two fast X-ray transients (XT1 and XT2) have been reported from the search in the Chandra Deep Field (CDF) data. Each transient shows an initial plateau lasting around hundreds to thousands seconds followed by a rapid decay in the light curve. In particular, CDF-S XT2 is found to be associated with a galaxy at redshift z= 0.738 and was explained as a counterpart of a binary neutron-star merger event. In this paper, motivated by the short duration and decay slopes of the two transients, we consider an alternative interpretation in which both events are accretion-driven flares from tidal disruption of white dwarfs by intermediate-mass black holes. We derive a theoretical model of the accretion rate history, and find that it fits the observed X-ray light curves well. The extremely super-Eddington peak luminosity of XT2 can be explained by the beaming effect of the system, likely in the form of a jet.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.06664  [pdf] - 1867294
X-ray transient CDF-S XT2: the electromagnetic and gravitational-wave radiations of a supra-massive neutron star
Comments: 7 ppages, 4 figures, submitted
Submitted: 2019-04-14
The merging process of binary neutron stars is the source of the quadrupole gravitational-wave (GW) radiation. Its remnant can be either a supra-massive or a stable NS. Such evidence of magnetar signature has been supported indirectly by observed X-ray plateau of some gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) afterglow. Recently, Xue et al. (2019) discovered an X-ray transient CDF-S XT2 that is claimed to be powered by a stable magnetar from the merger of double NS. In this paper, we revisit the X-ray emission of CDF-S XT2 and find that it is more consistent with a supra-massive magnetar central engine, surviving thousands of seconds to collapse black hole. We present the comparisons of the X-ray plateau luminosity, break time, and the parameters of magnetar between CDF-S XT2 and other short GRBs with internal plateau samples. By adapting the collapse time to constrain the equation of state (EOS), we find that three EOSs (GM1, DD2, and DDME2) are consistent with the observational data. On the other hand, if the most released rotation energy of magnetar is dominated by GW radiation, we also constrain the upper limit of ellipticity of NS for given EOS, and it is in a range in $[0.89-1.8]\times 10^{-3}$. Its GW signal cannot be detected by aLIGO or even for more sensitive Einstein Telescope in the future.