Normalized to: Ziour, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.4506 [pdf] - 260310
The recovery of General Relativity in massive gravity via the Vainshtein
mechanism
Submitted: 2010-07-26
We study in detail static spherically symmetric solutions of non linear
Pauli-Fierz theory. We obtain a numerical solution with a constant density
source. This solution shows a recovery of the corresponding solution of General
Relativity via the Vainshtein mechanism. This result has already been presented
by us in a recent letter, and we give here more detailed information on it as
well as on the procedure used to obtain it. We give new analytic insights upon
this problem, in particular for what concerns the question of the number of
solutions at infinity. We also present a weak field limit which allows to
capture all the salient features of the numerical solution, including the
Vainshtein crossover and the Yukawa decay.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.2943 [pdf] - 121242
k-Mouflage gravity
Submitted: 2009-05-18
We introduce a large class of scalar-tensor theories where gravity becomes
stronger at large distances via the exchange of a scalar that mixes with the
graviton. At small distances, i.e. large curvature, the scalar is screened via
an analog of the Vainshtein mechanism of massive gravity. The crossover
distance between the two regimes can be made cosmological by an appropriate
choice of the parameters.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.3101 [pdf] - 16468
Magnification Bias Corrections to Galaxy-Lensing Cross-Correlations
Submitted: 2008-09-18, last modified: 2009-05-05
Galaxy-galaxy or galaxy-quasar lensing can provide important information on
the mass distribution in the Universe. It consists of correlating the lensing
signal (either shear or magnification) of a background galaxy/quasar sample
with the number density of a foreground galaxy sample. However, the foreground
galaxy density is inevitably altered by the magnification bias due to the mass
between the foreground and the observer, leading to a correction to the
observed galaxy-lensing signal. The aim of this paper is to quantify this
correction. The single most important determining factor is the foreground
redshift z: the correction is small if the foreground galaxies are at low
redshifts but can become non-negligible for sufficiently high redshifts. For
instance, we find that for the multipole l=1000, the correction is above
1%*(5s-2)/b for z<0.37, and above 5%*(5s-2)/b for z<0.67, where s is the number
count slope of the foreground sample, and b its galaxy bias. These
considerations are particularly important for geometrical measures, such as the
Jain and Taylor ratio or its generalization by Zhang et al. Assuming
(5s-2)/b=1, we find that the foreground redshift should be limited to z<0.45 in
order to avoid biasing the inferred dark energy equation of state w by more
than 5%, and that even for a low foreground redshift (< 0.45), the background
samples must be well separated from the foreground to avoid incurring a bias of
similar magnitude. Lastly, we briefly comment on the possibility of obtaining
these geometrical measures without using galaxy shapes, using instead
magnification bias itself.