Normalized to: Zimer, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611846 [pdf] - 87232
XMM-Newton study of 0.012<z<0.024 groups. I: Overview of the IGM
thermodynamics
Submitted: 2006-11-28, last modified: 2006-11-29
We study the thermodynamic properties of the hot gas in a sample of groups in
the 0.012-0.024 redshift range, using XMM-Newton observations. We present
measurements of temperature, entropy, pressure and iron abundance.
Non-parametric fits are used to derive the mean properties of the sample and to
study dispersion in the values of entropy and pressure. The scaling of the
entropy at 0.2r500 matches well the results of Ponman et al. (2003). However,
compared to cool clusters, the groups in our sample reveal larger entropy at
inner radii and a substantially flatter slope in the entropy in the outskirts,
compared to both the prediction of pure gravitational heating and to
observations of clusters. This difference corresponds to the systematically
flatter group surface brightness profiles, reported previously. The scaled
pressure profiles can be well approximated with a Sersic model with n=4. We
find that groups exhibit a systematically larger dispersion in pressure,
compared to clusters of galaxies, while the dispersion in entropy is similar.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611858 [pdf] - 316621
The Two-dimensional XMM-Newton Group Survey: z<0.012 groups
Submitted: 2006-11-28
We present the results of the 2-dimensional XMM-Newton Group Survey (2dXGS),
an archival study of nearby galaxy groups. In this paper we consider eleven
nearby systems (z<0.012) in Mulchaey et al. (2003), which span a broad range in
X-ray luminosity from 10^40 to 10^43 ergs/s. We measure the iron abundance and
temperature distribution in these systems and derive pressure and entropy maps.
We find statistically significant evidence for structure in the entropy and
pressure of the gas component of seven groups on the 10-20% level. The
XMM-Newton data for the three groups with best statistics also suggest patchy
metalicity distributions within the central 20--50 kpc of the brightest group
galaxy, probed with 2-10 kpc resolution. This provides insights into the
processes associated with thermalization of the stellar mass loss. Analysis of
the global properties of the groups reveals a subclass of X-ray faint groups,
which are characterized by both higher entropy and lower pressure. We suggest
that the merger history of the central elliptical is responsible for both the
source and the observed thermodynamical properties of the hot gas of the X-ray
faint groups.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0505419 [pdf] - 73189
Cluster scaling and its redshift evolution from XMM-Newton
Submitted: 2005-05-19
We put together the results of XMM-Newton observations of a number of
representative group and cluster samples at low and high redshifts. These
results confirm the entropy ramp as an explanation of the observed scaling
relations. We observe a mild evolution in the entropy of clusters. The observed
degree of evolution is consistent with expectations of the shock heating at a
fixed overdensity (500) with respect to the critical density in LCDM. The study
of the evolution in the pressure scaling imposes strong requirements in the
definition of the average temperature of the cluster. The scaling temperature
should be consistent to better than the 10% level. Once such a consistency is
achieved, no additional evolution in the pressure has been detected in addition
to the prediction of the shock heating in the LCDM Universe.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0110046 [pdf] - 45104
The L_x-sigma Relation For Poor Groups of Galaxies
Submitted: 2001-10-01
We use a sample of 20 poor groups of galaxies to study the low L_x tail of
the L_x-sigma relationship. We have obtained redshifts for fainter members and
deep X-ray imaging of these groups. We find that the L_x-sigma relationship
derived for the rich clusters in the sample of Mushotzky & Scharf (1997) is
consistent with the data for our 20 poor groups. However, it is not possible to
reach strong conclusions about differences in the L_x-sigma relationship for
groups and clusters in general at the present time because of significant
differences between various cluster samples.