Normalized to: Zic, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.12073 [pdf] - 1791768
Numerical Simulation of Coronal Waves interacting with Coronal Holes: I.
Basic Features
Submitted: 2018-11-29
We developed a new numerical code that is able to perform 2.5D simulations of
a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) wave propagation in the corona, and its interaction
with a low density region, such as a coronal hole (CH). We show that the impact
of the wave on the CH leads to different effects, such as reflection and
transmission of the incoming wave, stationary features at the CH boundary, or
formation of a density depletion. We present a comprehensive analysis of the
morphology and kinematics of primary and secondary waves, that is, we describe
in detail the temporal evolution of density, magnetic field, plasma flow
velocity, phase speed and position of the wave amplitude. Effects like
reflection, refraction and transmission of the wave strongly support the theory
that large scale disturbances in the corona are fast MHD waves and build the
major distinction to the competing pseudo-wave theory. The formation of
stationary bright fronts was one of the main reasons for the development of
pseudo-waves. Here we show that stationary bright fronts can be produced by the
interactions of an MHD wave with a CH. We find secondary waves that are
traversing through the CH and we show that one part of these traversing waves
leaves the CH again, while another part is being reflected at the CH boundary
inside the CH. We observe a density depletion that is moving in the opposite
direction of the primary wave propagation. We show that the primary wave pushes
the CH boundary to the right, caused by the wave front exerting dynamic
pressure on the CH.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.05505 [pdf] - 1532674
Understanding the Physical Nature of Coronal "EIT Waves"
Long, David M.;
Bloomfield, D. Shaun;
Chen, Peng-Fei;
Downs, Cooper;
Gallagher, Peter T.;
Kwon, Ryun Young;
Vanninathan, Kamalam;
Veronig, Astrid M.;
Vourlidas, Angelos;
Vrsnak, Bojan;
Warmuth, Alexander;
Zic, Tomislav
Submitted: 2016-11-16
For almost 20 years the physical nature of globally propagating waves in the
solar corona (commonly called "EIT waves") has been controversial and subject
to debate. Additional theories have been proposed over the years to explain
observations that did not fit with the originally proposed fast-mode wave
interpretation. However, the incompatibility of observations made using the
Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) onboard the Solar and Heliospheric
Observatory with the fast-mode wave interpretation was challenged by differing
viewpoints from the twin Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory spacecraft and
higher spatial/temporal resolution data from the Solar Dynamics Observatory. In
this article, we reexamine the theories proposed to explain "EIT waves" to
identify measurable properties and behaviours that can be compared to current
and future observations. Most of us conclude that "EIT waves" are best
described as fast-mode large-amplitude waves/shocks that are initially driven
by the impulsive expansion of an erupting coronal mass ejection in the low
corona.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.07750 [pdf] - 1444228
On the Propagation of a Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejection during March
15 -- 17, 2015
Wang, Yuming;
Zhang, Quanhao;
Liu, Jiajia;
Shen, Chenglong;
Shen, Fang;
Yang, Zicai;
Zic, T.;
Vrsnak, B.;
Webb, D. F.;
Liu, Rui;
Wang, S.;
Zhang, Jie;
Hu, Qiang;
Zhuang, Bin
Submitted: 2016-07-26
The largest geomagnetic storm so far in the solar cycle 24 was produced by a
fast coronal mass ejection (CME) originating on 2015 March 15. It was an
initially west-oriented CME and expected to only cause a weak geomagnetic
disturbance. Why did this CME finally cause such a large geomagnetic storm? We
try to find some clues by investigating its propagation from the Sun to 1 AU.
First, we reconstruct the CME's kinematic properties in the corona from the
SOHO and SDO imaging data with the aid of the graduated cylindrical shell (GCS)
model. It is suggested that the CME propagated to the west
$\sim$$33^\circ$$\pm$$10^\circ$ away from the Sun-Earth line with a speed of
about 817 km s$^{-1}$ before leaving the field of view of the SOHO/LASCO C3
camera. A magnetic cloud (MC) corresponding to this CME was measured in-situ by
the Wind spacecraft two days later. By applying two MC reconstruction methods,
we infer the configuration of the MC as well as some kinematic information,
which implies that the CME possibly experienced an eastward deflection on its
way to 1 AU. However, due to the lack of observations from the STEREO
spacecraft, the CME's kinematic evolution in interplanetary space is not clear.
In order to fill this gap, we utilize numerical MHD simulation, drag-based CME
propagation model (DBM) and the model for CME deflection in interplanetary
space (DIPS) to recover the propagation process, especially the trajectory, of
the CME from $30 R_S$ to 1 AU. It is suggested that the trajectory of the CME
was deflected toward the Earth by about $12^\circ$, consistent with the
implication from the MC reconstruction at 1 AU. This eastward deflection
probably contributed to the CME's unexpected geoeffectiveness by pushing the
center of the initially west-oriented CME closer to the Earth.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4687 [pdf] - 853316
Combined Multipoint Remote and In Situ Observations of the Asymmetric
Evolution of a Fast Solar Coronal Mass Ejection
Rollett, T.;
Moestl, C.;
Temmer, M.;
Frahm, R. A.;
Davies, J. A.;
Veronig, A. M.;
Vrsnak, B.;
Amerstorfer, U. V.;
Farrugia, C. J.;
Zic, T.;
Zhang, T. L.
Submitted: 2014-07-17
We present an analysis of the fast coronal mass ejection (CME) of 2012 March
7, which was imaged by both STEREO spacecraft and observed in situ by
MESSENGER, Venus Express, Wind and Mars Express. Based on detected arrivals at
four different positions in interplanetary space, it was possible to strongly
constrain the kinematics and the shape of the ejection. Using the white-light
heliospheric imagery from STEREO-A and B, we derived two different kinematical
profiles for the CME by applying the novel constrained self-similar expansion
method. In addition, we used a drag-based model to investigate the influence of
the ambient solar wind on the CME's propagation. We found that two preceding
CMEs heading in different directions disturbed the overall shape of the CME and
influenced its propagation behavior. While the Venus-directed segment underwent
a gradual deceleration (from ~2700 km/s at 15 R_sun to ~1500 km/s at 154
R_sun), the Earth-directed part showed an abrupt retardation below 35 R_sun
(from ~1700 to ~900 km/s). After that, it was propagating with a quasi-constant
speed in the wake of a preceding event. Our results highlight the importance of
studies concerning the unequal evolution of CMEs. Forecasting can only be
improved if conditions in the solar wind are properly taken into account and if
attention is also paid to large events preceding the one being studied.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0629 [pdf] - 1116372
Characteristics of kinematics of a coronal mass ejection during the 2010
August 1 CME-CME interaction event
Temmer, Manuela;
Vrsnak, Bojan;
Rollett, Tanja;
Bein, Bianca;
de Koning, Curt A.;
Liu, Ying;
Bosman, Eckhard;
Davies, Jackie A.;
Möstl, Christian;
Zic, Tomislav;
Veronig, Astrid M.;
Bothmer, Volker;
Harrison, Richard;
Nitta, Nariaki;
Bisi, Mario;
Flor, Olga;
Eastwood, Jonathan;
Odstrcil, Dusan;
Forsyth, Robert
Submitted: 2012-02-03
We study the interaction of two successive coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
during the 2010 August 1 events using STEREO/SECCHI COR and HI data. We obtain
the direction of motion for both CMEs by applying several independent
reconstruction methods and find that the CMEs head in similar directions. This
provides evidence that a full interaction takes place between the two CMEs that
can be observed in the HI1 field-of-view. The full de-projected kinematics of
the faster CME from Sun to Earth is derived by combining remote observations
with in situ measurements of the CME at 1 AU. The speed profile of the faster
CME (CME2; ~1200 km/s) shows a strong deceleration over the distance range at
which it reaches the slower, preceding CME (CME1; ~700 km/s). By applying a
drag-based model we are able to reproduce the kinematical profile of CME2
suggesting that CME1 represents a magnetohydrodynamic obstacle for CME2 and
that, after the interaction, the merged entity propagates as a single structure
in an ambient flow of speed and density typical for quiet solar wind
conditions. Observational facts show that magnetic forces may contribute to the
enhanced deceleration of CME2. We speculate that the increase in magnetic
tension and pressure, when CME2 bends and compresses the magnetic field lines
of CME1, increases the efficiency of drag.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.3746 [pdf] - 27628
Analytic modeling of the Moreton wave kinematics
Submitted: 2009-08-26
The issue whether Moreton waves are flare-ignited or CME-driven, or a
combination of both, is still a matter of debate. We develop an analytical
model describing the evolution of a large-amplitude coronal wave emitted by the
expansion of a circular source surface in order to mimic the evolution of a
Moreton wave. The model results are confronted with observations of a strong
Moreton wave observed in association with the X3.8/3B flare/CME event from
January 17, 2005. Using different input parameters for the expansion of the
source region, either derived from the real CME observations (assuming that the
upward moving CME drives the wave), or synthetically generated scenarios
(expanding flare region, lateral expansion of the CME flanks), we calculate the
kinematics of the associated Moreton wave signature. Those model input
parameters are determined which fit the observed Moreton wave kinematics best.
Using the measured kinematics of the upward moving CME as the model input, we
are not able to reproduce the observed Moreton wave kinematics. The
observations of the Moreton wave can be reproduced only by applying a strong
and impulsive acceleration for the source region expansion acting in a piston
mechanism scenario. Based on these results we propose that the expansion of the
flaring region or the lateral expansion of the CME flanks is more likely the
driver of the Moreton wave than the upward moving CME front.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0707.1752 [pdf] - 3009
Large amplitude oscillatory motion along a solar filament
Submitted: 2007-07-12
Large amplitude oscillations of solar filaments is a phenomenon known for
more than half a century. Recently, a new mode of oscillations, characterized
by periodical plasma motions along the filament axis, was discovered. We
analyze such an event, recorded on 23 January 2002 in Big Bear Solar
Observatory H$\alpha$ filtergrams, in order to infer the triggering mechanism
and the nature of the restoring force. Motion along the filament axis of a
distinct buldge-like feature was traced, to quantify the kinematics of the
oscillatory motion. The data were fitted by a damped sine function, to estimate
the basic parameters of the oscillations. In order to identify the triggering
mechanism, morphological changes in the vicinity of the filament were analyzed.
The observed oscillations of the plasma along the filament was characterized by
an initial displacement of 24 Mm, initial velocity amplitude of 51 km/s, period
of 50 min, and damping time of 115 min. We interpret the trigger in terms of
poloidal magnetic flux injection by magnetic reconnection at one of the
filament legs. The restoring force is caused by the magnetic pressure gradient
along the filament axis. The period of oscillations, derived from the
linearized equation of motion (harmonic oscillator) can be expressed as
$P=\pi\sqrt{2}L/v_{A\phi}\approx4.4L/v_{A\phi}$, where $v_{A\phi}
=B_{\phi0}/\sqrt{\mu_0\rho}$ represents the Alfv\'en speed based on the
equilibrium poloidal field $B_{\phi0}$. Combination of our measurements with
some previous observations of the same kind of oscillations shows a good
agreement with the proposed interpretation.