Normalized to: Zibin, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06211 [pdf] - 1927941
Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lpez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-08-02
We report on the implications for cosmic inflation of the 2018 Release of the
Planck CMB anisotropy measurements. The results are fully consistent with the
two previous Planck cosmological releases, but have smaller uncertainties
thanks to improvements in the characterization of polarization at low and high
multipoles. Planck temperature, polarization, and lensing data determine the
spectral index of scalar perturbations to be $n_\mathrm{s}=0.9649\pm 0.0042$ at
68% CL and show no evidence for a scale dependence of $n_\mathrm{s}.$ Spatial
flatness is confirmed at a precision of 0.4% at 95% CL with the combination
with BAO data. The Planck 95% CL upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio,
$r_{0.002}<0.10$, is further tightened by combining with the BICEP2/Keck Array
BK15 data to obtain $r_{0.002}<0.056$. In the framework of single-field
inflationary models with Einstein gravity, these results imply that: (a)
slow-roll models with a concave potential, $V" (\phi) < 0,$ are increasingly
favoured by the data; and (b) two different methods for reconstructing the
inflaton potential find no evidence for dynamics beyond slow roll.
Non-parametric reconstructions of the primordial power spectrum consistently
confirm a pure power law. A complementary analysis also finds no evidence for
theoretically motivated parameterized features in the Planck power spectrum, a
result further strengthened for certain oscillatory models by a new combined
analysis that includes Planck bispectrum data. The new Planck polarization data
provide a stringent test of the adiabaticity of the initial conditions. The
polarization data also provide improved constraints on inflationary models that
predict a small statistically anisotropic quadrupolar modulation of the
primordial fluctuations. However, the polarization data do not confirm physical
models for a scale-dependent dipolar modulation.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.02552 [pdf] - 1896098
Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-06-06
Analysis of the Planck 2018 data set indicates that the statistical
properties of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies
are in excellent agreement with previous studies using the 2013 and 2015 data
releases. In particular, they are consistent with the Gaussian predictions of
the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, yet also confirm the presence of several
so-called "anomalies" on large angular scales. The novelty of the current
study, however, lies in being a first attempt at a comprehensive analysis of
the statistics of the polarization signal over all angular scales, using either
maps of the Stokes parameters, $Q$ and $U$, or the $E$-mode signal derived from
these using a new methodology (which we describe in an appendix). Although
remarkable progress has been made in reducing the systematic effects that
contaminated the 2015 polarization maps on large angular scales, it is still
the case that residual systematics (and our ability to simulate them) can limit
some tests of non-Gaussianity and isotropy. However, a detailed set of null
tests applied to the maps indicates that these issues do not dominate the
analysis on intermediate and large angular scales (i.e., $\ell \lesssim 400$).
In this regime, no unambiguous detections of cosmological non-Gaussianity, or
of anomalies corresponding to those seen in temperature, are claimed. Notably,
the stacking of CMB polarization signals centred on the positions of
temperature hot and cold spots exhibits excellent agreement with the
$\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, and also gives a clear indication of how
Planck provides state-of-the-art measurements of CMB temperature and
polarization on degree scales.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.03143 [pdf] - 1630131
Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry with CMB polarization
Submitted: 2017-04-11, last modified: 2018-02-05
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies exhibit a
large-scale dipolar power asymmetry. To determine whether this is due to a
real, physical modulation or is simply a large statistical fluctuation requires
the measurement of new modes. Here we forecast how well CMB polarization data
from \Planck\ and future experiments will be able to confirm or constrain
physical models for modulation. Fitting several such models to the \Planck\
temperature data allows us to provide predictions for polarization asymmetry.
While for some models and parameters \Planck\ polarization will decrease error
bars on the modulation amplitude by only a small percentage, we show,
importantly, that cosmic-variance-limited (and in some cases even \Planck)
polarization data can decrease the errors by considerably better than the
expectation of $\sqrt 2$ based on simple $\ell$-space arguments. We project
that if the primordial fluctuations are truly modulated (with parameters as
indicated by \Planck\ temperature data) then \Planck\ will be able to make a
2$\sigma$ detection of the modulation model with 20--75\% probability,
increasing to 45--99\% when cosmic-variance-limited polarization is considered.
We stress that these results are quite model dependent. Cosmic variance in
temperature is important: combining statistically isotropic polarization with
temperature data will spuriously increase the significance of the temperature
signal with 30\% probability for \Planck.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.10134 [pdf] - 1644724
Closing in on the large-scale CMB power asymmetry
Submitted: 2017-09-28
Measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature
anisotropies have revealed a dipolar asymmetry in power at the largest scales,
in apparent contradiction with the statistical isotropy of standard
cosmological models. The significance of the effect is not very high, and is
dependent on a posteriori choices. Nevertheless, a number of models have been
proposed that produce a scale-dependent asymmetry. We confront several such
models for a physical, position-space modulation with CMB temperature
observations. We find that, while some models that maintain the standard
isotropic power spectrum are allowed, others, such as those with modulated
tensor or uncorrelated isocurvature modes, can be ruled out on the basis of the
overproduction of isotropic power. This remains the case even when an extra
isocurvature mode fully anti-correlated with the adiabatic perturbations is
added to suppress power on large scales.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.02114 [pdf] - 1579600
Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Gjerlow, E.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-07, last modified: 2017-09-14
We present the implications for cosmic inflation of the Planck measurements
of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies in both temperature and
polarization based on the full Planck survey. The Planck full mission
temperature data and a first release of polarization data on large angular
scales measure the spectral index of curvature perturbations to be
$n_\mathrm{s} = 0.968 \pm 0.006$ and tightly constrain its scale dependence to
$d n_s/d \ln k =-0.003 \pm 0.007$ when combined with the Planck lensing
likelihood. When the high-$\ell$ polarization data is included, the results are
consistent and uncertainties are reduced. The upper bound on the
tensor-to-scalar ratio is $r_{0.002} < 0.11$ (95% CL), consistent with the
B-mode polarization constraint $r< 0.12$ (95% CL) obtained from a joint
BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck analysis. These results imply that $V(\phi)
\propto \phi^2$ and natural inflation are now disfavoured compared to models
predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio, such as $R^2$ inflation. Three
independent methods reconstructing the primordial power spectrum are
investigated. The Planck data are consistent with adiabatic primordial
perturbations. We investigate inflationary models producing an anisotropic
modulation of the primordial curvature power spectrum as well as generalized
models of inflation not governed by a scalar field with a canonical kinetic
term. The 2015 results are consistent with the 2013 analysis based on the
nominal mission data.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.02618 [pdf] - 1551524
Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry: from temperature to k
space to lensing
Submitted: 2015-12-08, last modified: 2017-03-22
One of the most intriguing hints of a departure from the standard
cosmological model is a large-scale dipolar power asymmetry in the cosmic
microwave background (CMB). If not a statistical fluke, its origins must lie in
the modulation of the position-space fluctuations via a physical mechanism,
which requires the observation of new modes to confirm or refute. We introduce
an approach to describe such a modulation in k space and calculate its effects
on the CMB temperature and lensing. We fit the k-space modulation parameters to
Planck 2015 temperature data and show that CMB lensing will not provide us with
enough independent information to confirm or refute such a mechanism. However,
our approach elucidates some poorly understood aspects of the asymmetry, in
particular that it is weakly constrained. Also, it will be particularly useful
in predicting the effectiveness of polarization in testing a physical
modulation.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.08853 [pdf] - 1486793
Planck 2015 results. III. LFI systematic uncertainties
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Catalano, A.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Keihäen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Levrier, F.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Noviello, F.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-07-31, last modified: 2016-02-08
We present the current accounting of systematic effect uncertainties for the
Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) that are relevant to the 2015 release of the
Planck cosmological results, showing the robustness and consistency of our data
set, especially for polarization analysis. We use two complementary approaches:
(i) simulations based on measured data and physical models of the known
systematic effects; and (ii) analysis of difference maps containing the same
sky signal ("null-maps"). The LFI temperature data are limited by instrumental
noise. At large angular scales the systematic effects are below the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) temperature power spectrum by several orders of
magnitude. In polarization the systematic uncertainties are dominated by
calibration uncertainties and compete with the CMB $E$-modes in the multipole
range 10--20. Based on our model of all known systematic effects, we show that
these effects introduce a slight bias of around $0.2\,\sigma$ on the
reionization optical depth derived from the 70\,GHz $EE$ spectrum using the 30
and 353\,GHz channels as foreground templates. At 30\,GHz the systematic
effects are smaller than the Galactic foreground at all scales in temperature
and polarization, which allows us to consider this channel as a reliable
template of synchrotron emission. We assess the residual uncertainties due to
LFI effects on CMB maps and power spectra after component separation and show
that these effects are smaller than the CMB amplitude at all scales. We also
assess the impact on non-Gaussianity studies and find it to be negligible. Some
residuals still appear in null maps from particular sky survey pairs,
particularly at 30 GHz, suggesting possible straylight contamination due to an
imperfect knowledge of the beam far sidelobes.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.07135 [pdf] - 1483209
Planck 2015 results. XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Aluri, P. K.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Pant, N.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-06-23, last modified: 2016-01-22
We test the statistical isotropy and Gaussianity of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropies using observations made by the Planck satellite.
Our results are based mainly on the full Planck mission for temperature, but
also include some polarization measurements.
In particular, we consider the CMB anisotropy maps derived from the
multi-frequency Planck data by several component-separation methods. For the
temperature anisotropies, we find excellent agreement between results based on
these sky maps over both a very large fraction of the sky and a broad range of
angular scales, establishing that potential foreground residuals do not affect
our studies.
Tests of skewness, kurtosis, multi-normality, N-point functions, and
Minkowski functionals indicate consistency with Gaussianity, while a power
deficit at large angular scales is manifested in several ways, for example low
map variance. The results of a peak statistics analysis are consistent with the
expectations of a Gaussian random field. The "Cold Spot" is detected with
several methods, including map kurtosis, peak statistics, and mean temperature
profile. We thoroughly probe the large-scale dipolar power asymmetry, detecting
it with several independent tests, and address the subject of a posteriori
correction. Tests of directionality suggest the presence of angular clustering
from large to small scales, but at a significance that is dependent on the
details of the approach. We perform the first examination of polarization data,
finding the morphology of stacked peaks to be consistent with the expectations
of statistically isotropic simulations. Where they overlap, these results are
consistent with the Planck 2013 analysis based on the nominal mission data and
provide our most thorough view of the statistics of the CMB fluctuations to
date.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5087 [pdf] - 1250057
Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Helou, G.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Reinecke, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Türler, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2015-07-22
Our velocity relative to the rest frame of the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) generates a dipole temperature anisotropy on the sky which has been well
measured for more than 30 years, and has an accepted amplitude of v/c =
0.00123, or v = 369km/s. In addition to this signal generated by Doppler
boosting of the CMB monopole, our motion also modulates and aberrates the CMB
temperature fluctuations (as well as every other source of radiation at
cosmological distances). This is an order 0.1% effect applied to fluctuations
which are already one part in roughly one hundred thousand, so it is quite
small. Nevertheless, it becomes detectable with the all-sky coverage, high
angular resolution, and low noise levels of the Planck satellite. Here we
report a first measurement of this velocity signature using the aberration and
modulation effects on the CMB temperature anisotropies, finding a component in
the known dipole direction, (l,b)=(264, 48) [deg], of 384km/s +- 78km/s (stat.)
+- 115km/s (syst.). This is a significant confirmation of the expected
velocity.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5082 [pdf] - 929663
Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Hiraud, Y.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vernle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Treguer-Goudineau, J.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
White, M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2015-02-03
We analyse the implications of the Planck data for cosmic inflation. The
Planck nominal mission temperature anisotropy measurements, combined with the
WMAP large-angle polarization, constrain the scalar spectral index to $n_s =
0.9603 \pm 0.0073$, ruling out exact scale invariance at over 5 $\sigma$.
Planck establishes an upper bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r < 0.11
(95% CL). The Planck data thus shrink the space of allowed standard
inflationary models, preferring potentials with V" < 0. Exponential potential
models, the simplest hybrid inflationary models, and monomial potential models
of degree n > 2 do not provide a good fit to the data. Planck does not find
statistically significant running of the scalar spectral index, obtaining $d
n_s/d ln k = -0.0134 \pm 0.0090$. Several analyses dropping the slow-roll
approximation are carried out, including detailed model comparison and
inflationary potential reconstruction. We also investigate whether the
primordial power spectrum contains any features. We find that models with a
parameterized oscillatory feature improve the fit $\chi^2$ by ~ 10; however,
Bayesian evidence does not prefer these models. We constrain several
single-field inflation models with generalized Lagrangians by combining power
spectrum data with bounds on $f_\mathrm{NL}$ measured by Planck. The fractional
primordial contribution of CDM isocurvature modes in the curvaton and axion
scenarios has upper bounds of 0.25% or 3.9% (95% CL), respectively. In models
with arbitrarily correlated CDM or neutrino isocurvature modes, an
anticorrelation can improve $\chi^2$ by approximatively 4 as a result of
slightly lowering the theoretical prediction for the $\ell<40$ multipoles
relative to the higher multipoles. Nonetheless, the data are consistent with
adiabatic initial conditions.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.3831 [pdf] - 866675
Nowhere to hide: closing in on cosmological homogeneity
Submitted: 2014-09-12
Homogeneity is a crucial, but poorly tested, assumption in cosmology. We
introduce a new approach which allows us to place limits on the presence of
localized structures within essentially our entire observable volume, using
cosmic microwave background secondary anisotropies. We find that structures
cannot exceed roughly 20 times their expected amplitude over most of our
observable volume. Similarly, we place tight constraints on statistical
inhomogeneity within our volume, performing the first power spectrum
reconstruction using secondary anisotropies alone. We find that the standard
model passes this important new consistency test. Our approach probes
homogeneity over vastly larger volumes and scales than previous studies based
on surveys.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.4442 [pdf] - 863717
Comment on "A Supervoid Imprinting the Cold Spot in the Cosmic Microwave
Background"
Submitted: 2014-08-19
Recently Finelli et al. [http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1555] found evidence for a
relatively nearby (z = 0.16) void in a galaxy catalogue in the direction of the
cosmic microwave background (CMB) Cold Spot. Using a perturbative calculation,
they also claimed that such a void would produce a CMB decrement comparable to
that of the observed Cold Spot, mainly via the nonlinear Rees-Sciama effect.
Here I calculate the effect of such a void using a fully general relativistic
model and show that, to the contrary, the linear integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect
dominates and produces a substantially weaker decrement than observed.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.4866 [pdf] - 837123
Scalar-tensor correlations and large-scale power suppression
Submitted: 2014-04-18, last modified: 2014-06-09
Recent measurements from the BICEP2 cosmic microwave background polarization
experiment indicate the presence of primordial gravitational waves with
surprisingly large amplitude. If these results are confirmed, they point to a
discrepancy with temperature anisotropy power spectrum measurements and suggest
that extensions to the standard cosmological model may be required to resolve
the discrepancy. One intriguing extension is an anticorrelation between tensors
and scalars to naturally suppress the temperature power. Here I examine this
possibility and show that such a suppression is not possible in the presence of
a general form of anticorrelation.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5062 [pdf] - 832330
Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Aussel, H.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Barrena, R.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bethermin, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Blanchard, A.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bourdin, H.;
Bowyer, J. W.;
Bridges, M.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carr, R.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casale, M.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Déchelette, T.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fabre, O.;
Falgarone, E.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Filliard, C.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Freschi, M.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Frommert, M.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gallegos, J.;
Galli, S.;
Gandolfo, B.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Gilfanov, M.;
Girard, D.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hansen, M.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Hempel, A.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Ho, S.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hou, Z.;
Hovest, W.;
Huey, G.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jasche, J.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kalberla, P.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Kerp, J.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lavabre, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Leroy, C.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Li, C.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lowe, S.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matsumura, T.;
Matthai, F.;
Maurin, L.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McDonald, A.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Millea, M.;
Miniscalco, R.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Nesvadba, N. P. H.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
North, C.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Orieux, F.;
Osborne, S.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Paykari, P.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Pullen, A. R.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Rahlin, A.;
Räth, C.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Riazuelo, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ringeval, C.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanselme, L.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schiavon, F.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Smith, K.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Tuttlebee, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vibert, L.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Winkel, B.;
Xia, J. -Q.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-06-05
The ESA's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early Universe and its
subsequent evolution, was launched 14 May 2009 and has been scanning the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously since 12 August 2009. This paper
gives an overview of the mission and its performance, the processing, analysis,
and characteristics of the data, the scientific results, and the science data
products and papers in the release. The science products include maps of the
CMB and diffuse extragalactic foregrounds, a catalogue of compact Galactic and
extragalactic sources, and a list of sources detected through the SZ effect.
The likelihood code used to assess cosmological models against the Planck data
and a lensing likelihood are described. Scientific results include robust
support for the standard six-parameter LCDM model of cosmology and improved
measurements of its parameters, including a highly significant deviation from
scale invariance of the primordial power spectrum. The Planck values for these
parameters and others derived from them are significantly different from those
previously determined. Several large-scale anomalies in the temperature
distribution of the CMB, first detected by WMAP, are confirmed with higher
confidence. Planck sets new limits on the number and mass of neutrinos, and has
measured gravitational lensing of CMB anisotropies at greater than 25 sigma.
Planck finds no evidence for non-Gaussianity in the CMB. Planck's results agree
well with results from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. Planck
finds a lower Hubble constant than found in some more local measures. Some
tension is also present between the amplitude of matter fluctuations derived
from CMB data and that derived from SZ data. The Planck and WMAP power spectra
are offset from each other by an average level of about 2% around the first
acoustic peak.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5090 [pdf] - 1165440
Planck intermediate results. XIII. Constraints on peculiar velocities
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Democles, J.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Doerl, U.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Frommert, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Genova-Santos, R. T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jasche, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leonardi, R.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Osborne, S.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Puisieux, S.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Roman, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Spencer, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Welikala, N.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-03-30
Using \Planck\ data combined with the Meta Catalogue of X-ray detected
Clusters of galaxies (MCXC), we address the study of peculiar motions by
searching for evidence of the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect (kSZ). By
implementing various filters designed to extract the kSZ generated at the
positions of the clusters, we obtain consistent constraints on the radial
peculiar velocity average, root mean square (rms), and local bulk flow
amplitude at different depths. For the whole cluster sample of average redshift
0.18, the measured average radial peculiar velocity with respect to the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) radiation at that redshift, i.e., the kSZ monopole,
amounts to $72 \pm 60$ km s$^{-1}$. This constitutes less than 1% of the
relative Hubble velocity of the cluster sample with respect to our local CMB
frame. While the linear $\Lambda$CDM prediction for the typical cluster radial
velocity rms at $z=0.15$ is close to 230km s$^{-1}$, the upper limit imposed by
\Planck\ data on the cluster subsample corresponds to 800 km s$^{-1}$ at 95%
confidence level, i.e., about three times higher. \Planck\ data also set strong
constraints on the local bulk flow in volumes centred on the Local Group. There
is no detection of bulk flow as measured in any comoving sphere extending to
the maximum redshift covered by the cluster sample. A blind search for bulk
flows in this sample has an upper limit of 254 km s$^{-1}$ (95% confidence
level) dominated by CMB confusion and instrumental noise, indicating that the
Universe is largely homogeneous on Gpc scales. In this context, in conjunction
with supernova observations, \Planck\ is able to rule out a large class of
inhomogeneous void models as alternatives to dark energy or modified gravity.
The \Planck\ constraints on peculiar velocities and bulk flows are thus
consistent with the $\Lambda$CDM scenario.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.3068 [pdf] - 480028
Can decaying modes save void models for acceleration?
Submitted: 2011-08-15, last modified: 2011-12-01
The unexpected dimness of Type Ia supernovae (SNe), apparently due to
accelerated expansion driven by some form of dark energy or modified gravity,
has led to attempts to explain the observations using only general relativity
with baryonic and cold dark matter, but by dropping the standard assumption of
homogeneity on Hubble scales. In particular, the SN data can be explained if we
live near the centre of a Hubble-scale void. However, such void models have
been shown to be inconsistent with various observations, assuming the void
consists of a pure growing mode. Here it is shown that models with significant
decaying mode contribution today can be ruled out on the basis of the expected
cosmic microwave background spectral distortion. This essentially closes one of
the very few remaining loopholes in attempts to rule out void models, and
strengthens the evidence for Hubble-scale homogeneity.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.0909 [pdf] - 394340
Linear kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect and void models for
acceleration
Submitted: 2011-05-04, last modified: 2011-08-02
There has been considerable recent interest in cosmological models in which
the current apparent acceleration is due to a very large local underdensity, or
void, instead of some form of dark energy. Here we examine a new proposal to
constrain such models using the linear kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) effect
due to structure within the void. The simplified "Hubble bubble" models
previously studied appeared to predict far more kSZ power than is actually
observed, independently of the details of the initial conditions and evolution
of perturbations in such models. We show that the constraining power of the kSZ
effect is considerably weakened (though still impressive) under a fully
relativistic treatment of the problem, and point out several theoretical
ambiguities and observational shortcomings which further qualify the results.
Nevertheless, we conclude that a very large class of void models is ruled out
by the combination of kSZ and other methods.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.1305 [pdf] - 1042399
No evidence for anomalously low variance circles on the sky
Submitted: 2010-12-06, last modified: 2011-04-06
In a recent paper, Gurzadyan & Penrose claim to have found directions on the
sky centred on which are circles of anomalously low variance in the cosmic
microwave background (CMB). These features are presented as evidence for a
particular picture of the very early Universe. We attempted to repeat the
analysis of these authors, and we can indeed confirm that such variations do
exist in the temperature variance for annuli around points in the data.
However, we find that this variation is entirely expected in a sky which
contains the usual CMB anisotropies. In other words, properly simulated
Gaussian CMB data contain just the sorts of variations claimed. Gurzadyan &
Penrose have not found evidence for pre-Big Bang phenomena, but have simply
re-discovered that the CMB contains structure.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.6262 [pdf] - 338465
Non-standard morphological relic patterns in the cosmic microwave
background
Submitted: 2011-03-31
Statistically anomalous signals in the microwave background have been
extensively studied in general in multipole space, and in real space mainly for
circular and other simple patterns. In this paper we search for a range of
non-trivial patterns in the temperature data from WMAP 7-year observations. We
find a very significant detection of a number of such features and discuss
their consequences for the essential character of the cosmos.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.3725 [pdf] - 355513
Precision cosmology defeats void models for acceleration
Submitted: 2010-07-21, last modified: 2011-03-24
The suggestion that we occupy a privileged position near the centre of a
large, nonlinear, and nearly spherical void has recently attracted much
attention as an alternative to dark energy. Putting aside the philosophical
problems with this scenario, we perform the most complete and up-to-date
comparison with cosmological data. We use supernovae and the full cosmic
microwave background spectrum as the basis of our analysis. We also include
constraints from radial baryonic acoustic oscillations, the local Hubble rate,
age, big bang nucleosynthesis, the Compton y-distortion, and for the first time
include the local amplitude of matter fluctuations, \sigma_8. These all paint a
consistent picture in which voids are in severe tension with the data. In
particular, void models predict a very low local Hubble rate, suffer from an
"old age problem", and predict much less local structure than is observed.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.2990 [pdf] - 397183
Tilted Physics: A Cosmologically Dipole-Modulated Sky
Submitted: 2010-11-12
Physical constants and cosmological parameters could vary with position. On
the largest scales such variations would manifest themselves as gradients
across our Hubble volume, leading to dipole-modulation of the cosmic microwave
anisotropies. This generically leads to a correlation between adjacent
multipoles in the spherical harmonics expansion of the sky, a distinctive
signal which should be searched for in future data sets.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0273 [pdf] - 282639
Spatial and temporal tuning in void models for acceleration
Submitted: 2010-09-01, last modified: 2010-11-03
There has been considerable interest in recent years in cosmological models
in which we inhabit a very large, underdense void as an alternative to dark
energy. A longstanding objection to this proposal is that observations limit
our position to be very close to the void centre. By selecting from a family of
void profiles that fit supernova luminosity data, we carefully determine how
far from the centre we could be. To do so, we use the observed dipole component
of the cosmic microwave background, as well as an additional stochastic
peculiar velocity arising from primordial perturbations. We find that we are
constrained to live within 80 Mpc of the centre of a void--a somewhat weaker
constraint than found in previous studies, but nevertheless a strong violation
of the Copernican principle. By considering how such a Gpc-scale void would
appear on the microwave sky, we also show that there can be a maximum of one of
these voids within our Hubble radius. Hence, the constraint on our position
corresponds to a fraction of the Hubble volume of order 10^{-8}. Finally, we
use the fact that void models only look temporarily similar to a
cosmological-constant-dominated universe to argue that these models are not
free of temporal fine-tuning.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.3761 [pdf] - 16589
Can we avoid dark energy?
Submitted: 2008-09-22, last modified: 2008-12-21
The idea that we live near the centre of a large, nonlinear void has
attracted attention recently as an alternative to dark energy or modified
gravity. We show that an appropriate void profile can fit both the latest
cosmic microwave background and supernova data. However, this requires either a
fine-tuned primordial spectrum or a Hubble rate so low as to rule these models
out. We also show that measurements of the radial baryon acoustic scale can
provide very strong constraints. Our results present a serious challenge to
void models of acceleration.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:0808.2047 [pdf] - 15403
Gauging the cosmic microwave background
Submitted: 2008-08-14, last modified: 2008-12-21
We provide a new derivation of the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB), and find an exact expression that can be readily expanded
perturbatively. Close attention is paid to gauge issues, with the motivation to
examine the effect of super-Hubble modes on the CMB. We calculate a transfer
function that encodes the behaviour of the dipole, and examine its
long-wavelength behaviour. We show that contributions to the dipole from
adiabatic super-Hubble modes are strongly suppressed, even in the presence of a
cosmological constant, contrary to claims in the literature. We also introduce
a naturally defined CMB monopole, which exhibits closely analogous
long-wavelength behaviour. We discuss the geometrical origin of this
super-Hubble suppression, pointing out that it is a simple reflection of
adiabaticity, and hence argue that it will occur regardless of the matter
content.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:0804.1787 [pdf] - 11670
Scalar Perturbations on Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi Spacetimes
Submitted: 2008-04-10, last modified: 2008-07-11
In recent years there has been growing interest in verifying the
horizon-scale homogeneity of the Universe that follows from applying the
Copernican Principle to the observed isotropy. This program has been stimulated
by the discovery that a very large void, centred near us, can explain supernova
luminosity distance measurements without dark energy. It is crucial to confront
such models with as wide a variety of data as possible. With this application
in mind, I develop the relativistic theory of linear scalar perturbations on
spherically symmetric dust (Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi) spacetimes, using the
covariant 1 + 1 + 2 formalism. I show that the evolution of perturbations is
determined by a small set of new linear transfer functions. If decaying modes
are ignored (to be consistent with the standard inflationary paradigm), the
standard techniques of perturbation theory on homogeneous backgrounds, such as
harmonic expansion, can be applied, and results closely paralleling those of
familiar cosmological perturbation theory can be obtained.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:0804.1771 [pdf] - 11668
The cosmic variance of Omega
Submitted: 2008-04-10
How much can we know about our Universe? All of our observations are
restricted to a finite volume, and therefore our estimates of presumably global
cosmological parameters are necessarily based on incomplete information. Even
assuming that the Standard Model of cosmology is correct, this means that some
cosmological questions may be unanswerable. For example, is the curvature
parameter Omega_K positive, negative, or identically zero? If its magnitude is
sufficiently small, then due to cosmic variance no causal observation can ever
answer that question. In this article, we first describe the gauge problems
associated with defining the cosmic variance of cosmological parameters, then
describe a solution involving the use of parameters defined on the surface of
last scattering, and finally calculate the statistical variance of ideal
measurements of the matter, radiation, and curvature density parameters. We
find that Omega_K cannot be measured to better than about 1.5x10^(-5) (1
sigma), and that this limit has already begun to decrease due to the flattening
effect of dark energy. Proposed 21 cm hydrogen experiments, for example, make
this limit more than just a theoretical curiosity.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.4482 [pdf] - 2702
The Evolution of the Cosmic Microwave Background
Submitted: 2007-06-29, last modified: 2007-12-19
We discuss the time dependence and future of the Cosmic Microwave Background
(CMB) in the context of the standard cosmological model, in which we are now
entering a state of endless accelerated expansion. The mean temperature will
simply decrease until it reaches the effective temperature of the de Sitter
vacuum, while the dipole will oscillate as the Sun orbits the Galaxy. However,
the higher CMB multipoles have a richer phenomenology. The CMB anisotropy power
spectrum will for the most part simply project to smaller scales, as the
comoving distance to last scattering increases, and we derive a scaling
relation that describes this behaviour. However, there will also be a dramatic
increase in the integrated Sachs-Wolfe contribution at low multipoles. We also
discuss the effects of tensor modes and optical depth due to Thomson
scattering. We introduce a correlation function relating the sky maps at two
times and the closely related power spectrum of the difference map. We compute
the evolution both analytically and numerically, and present simulated future
sky maps.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:0709.4040 [pdf] - 5347
Observing the evolution of the CMB
Submitted: 2007-09-26
Most cosmological parameters are expected to change significantly only on
cosmological time scales, but given the large amount of information contained
within the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) sky, we can expect that changes in
the CMB should be observable on much shorter time scales. Here we quantify this
expectation, examining the detectability of the dominant effects on short time
scales. We find that an ideal future experiment with currently achievable
sensitivity could detect the changing dipole due to our galactic motion in
about 10 years, but that it would take around 4000 years to detect a change in
the higher order multipoles.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605709 [pdf] - 82396
How Many Universes Do There Need To Be?
Submitted: 2006-05-29, last modified: 2007-03-19
In the simplest cosmological models consistent with General Relativity, the
total volume of the Universe is either finite or infinite, depending on whether
or not the spatial curvature is positive. Current data suggest that the
curvature is very close to flat, implying that one can place a lower limit on
the total volume. In a Universe of finite age, the "particle horizon" defines
the patch of the Universe which is observable to us. Based on today's best-fit
cosmological parameters it is possible to constrain the number of observable
Universe sized patches, N_U. Specifically, using the new WMAP data, we can say
that there are at least 21 patches out there the same volume as ours, at 95%
confidence. Moreover, even if the precision of our cosmological measurements
continues to increase, density perturbations at the particle horizon size limit
us to never knowing that there are more than about 10^5 patches out there.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:physics/0511135 [pdf] - 119127
The Real Message in the Sky
Submitted: 2005-11-15
A recent paper by Hsu & Zee (physics/0510102) suggests that if a Creator
wanted to leave a message for us, and she wanted it to be decipherable to all
sentient beings, then she would place it on the most cosmic of all billboards,
the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) sky. Here we point out that the spherical
harmonic coefficients of the observed CMB anisotropies (or their squared
amplitudes at each multipole) depend on the location of the observer, in both
space and time. The amount of observer-independent information available in the
CMB is a small fraction of the total that any observer can measure. Hence a
lengthy message on the CMB sky is fundamentally no less observer-specific than
a communication hidden in this morning's tea-leaves. Nevertheless, the CMB sky
does encode a wealth of information about the structure of the cosmos and
possibly about the nature of physics at the highest energy levels. The Universe
has left us a message all on its own.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0108008 [pdf] - 113885
Dynamical Chaos and the Growth of Cosmological Fluctuations
Submitted: 2001-08-01
I demonstrate that instability in a system of homogeneous scalar fields leads
to the growth of super-Hubble metric perturbations. This generalizes the result
that parametric resonance can lead to the growth of cosmological perturbations.
Since dynamical chaos is common in multi-field quartically coupled systems, I
argue that the evolution of the fields after inflation must be examined to
determine whether the amplitude of cosmological metric perturbations is
underestimated in the standard inflationary calculations. I illustrate this
effect with a simple hybrid inflation model.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0007219 [pdf] - 113573
Backreaction and the Parametric Resonance of Cosmological Fluctuations
Submitted: 2000-07-20
We study the class of two-field inflationary Universe models \lambda\phi^4/4
+ g^2\chi^2\phi^2/2, in which parametric resonance during the initial stages of
reheating can lead to an exponential amplification of the amplitude of
cosmological fluctuations. Employing both analytical arguments and numerical
simulations, we determine the time at which backreaction of fluctuations on the
background fields shuts off the exponential growth, making use of the Hartree
approximation, and including scalar metric perturbations. For the case
g^2/\lambda=2, we find that the amplitude of fluctuations after preheating will
exceed the observational upper bound independent of the value of \lambda,
unless the duration of inflation is very long. Cosmological fluctuations are
acceptably small for g^2/\lambda>=8. We also find that the addition of
\chi-field self-interaction can limit the growth of fluctuations, and in the
negative-coupling case the system can become effectively single-field, removing
the resonance.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9901028 [pdf] - 104622
Limits on the gravity wave contribution to microwave anisotropies
Submitted: 1999-01-04, last modified: 1999-09-13
We present limits on the fraction of large angle microwave anisotropies which
could come from tensor perturbations. We use the COBE results as well as
smaller scale CMB observations, measurements of galaxy correlations, abundances
of galaxy clusters, and Lyman alpha absorption cloud statistics. Our aim is to
provide conservative limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio for standard
inflationary models. For power-law inflation, for example, we find T/S<0.52 at
95% confidence, with a similar constraint for phi^p potentials. However, for
models with tensor amplitude unrelated to the scalar spectral index it is still
currently possible to have T/S>1.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9904228 [pdf] - 106125
Gravity waves goodbye
Submitted: 1999-04-18
The detection of a stochastic background of long-wavelength gravitational
waves (tensors) in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy would be an
invaluable probe of the high energy physics of the early universe.
Unfortunately a combination of factors now makes such a detection seem
unlikely: the vast majority of the CMB signal appears to come from density
perturbations (scalars) - detailed fits to current observations indicate a
tensor-to-scalar quadrupole ratio of T/S < 0.5 for the simplest models; and on
the theoretical side the best-motivated inflationary models seem to require
very small T/S. Unfortunately CMB temperature anisotropies can only probe a
gravity wave signal down to T/S \sim 10% and optimistic assumptions about
polarization of the CMB only lower this another order of magnitude.