sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Zhuang, Renlin

Normalized to: Zhuang, R.

6 article(s) in total. 156 co-authors, from 1 to 26 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 123,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.11071  [pdf] - 2099842
Identification of a non-thermal X-ray burst with the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 and a fast radio burst with Insight-HXMT
Comments: 24 pages, 10 figures, Submitted to Nature on May 9th, 2020. Subject to press embargo until date TBA
Submitted: 2020-05-22
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are short pulses observed in radio band from cosmological distances, some of which emit repeating bursts. The physical origins of these mysterious events have been subject to wide speculations and heated debates. One class of models invoke soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs), or magnetars, as the sources of FRBs. Magnetars are rotating neutron stars with extremely strong magnetic field and can sporadically emit bursts from X-ray ($\sim$keV) to soft gamma-ray ($\sim$sub-MeV) with duration from $10^{-2}$~s to $10^2$~s. However, even though some bright radio bursts have been observed from some magnetars, no FRB-like events had been detected to be associated with any magnetar burst, including one giant flare, and no radio burst has been associated with any X-ray event from any magnetar. Therefore, there is still no observational evidence for magnetar-FRB association up to today. Recently, a pair of FRB-like bursts (FRB~200428 hereafter) separated by 30 milliseconds (ms) were detected from the general direction of the Galactic magnetar SGR~J1935+2154. Here we report the detection of a non-thermal X-ray burst in the 1-250 keV energy band with the Insight-HXMT satellite, which we identify as emitted from SGR~J1935+2154. The burst showed two hard peaks with a separation of $\sim30$ ms, consistent with the separation between the two bursts in FRB~200428. The delay time between the double radio and X-ray peaks is $\sim8.57$ s, fully consistent with the dispersion delay of FRB~200428. We thus identify the non-thermal X-ray burst is associated with FRB~200428 whose high energy counterpart is the two hard peaks in X-ray. Our results suggest that the non-thermal X-ray burst and FRB~200428 share the same physical origin in an explosive event from SGR~J1935+2154.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2004.13307  [pdf] - 2085316
Insight-HXMT insight into switch of the accretion mode: the case of the X-ray pulsar 4U 1901+03
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures, accepted by JHEAP
Submitted: 2020-04-28
We use the In data collected during the 2019 outburst from X-ray pulsar 4U 1901+03 to complement the orbital parameters reported by Fermi/GBM. Using the Insight-HXMT, we examine the correlation between the derivative of the intrinsic spin frequency and bolometric flux based on accretion torque models. It was found that the pulse profiles significantly evolve during the outburst. The existence of two types of the profile's pattern discovered in the Insight-HXMT data indicates that this source experienced transition between a super-critical and a sub-critical accretion regime during its 2019 outburst. Based on the evolution of the pulse profiles and the torque model, we derive the distance to 4U 1901+03 as 12.4+-0.2 kpc.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:2004.12946  [pdf] - 2115294
The evolution of the broadband temporal features observed in the black-hole transient MAXI J1820+070 with Insight-HXMT
Comments: Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2020-04-27
We study the evolution of the temporal properties of MAXI 1820+070 during the 2018 outburst in its hard state from MJD 58190 to 58289 with Insight-HXMT in a broad energy band 1-150 keV. We find different behaviors of the hardness ratio, the fractional rms and time lag before and after MJD 58257, suggesting a transition occurred at around this point. The observed time lags between the soft photons in the 1-5 keV band and the hard photons in higher energy bands, up to 150 keV, are frequency-dependent: the time lags in the low-frequency range, 2-10 mHz, are both soft and hard lags with a timescale of dozens of seconds but without a clear trend along the outburst; the time lags in the high-frequency range, 1-10 Hz, are only hard lags with a timescale of tens of milliseconds; first increase until around MJD 58257 and decrease after this date. The high-frequency time lags are significantly correlated to the photon index derived from the fit to the quasi-simultaneous NICER spectrum in the 1-10 keV band. This result is qualitatively consistent with a model in which the high-frequency time lags are produced by Comptonization in a jet.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:2004.00791  [pdf] - 2119922
Discovery of delayed spin-up behavior following two large glitches in the Crab pulsar, and the statistics of such processes
Ge, M. Y.; Zhang, S. N.; Lu, F. J.; Li, T. P.; Yuan, J. P.; Zheng, X. P.; Huang, Y.; Zheng, S. J.; Chen, Y. P.; Chang, Z.; Tuo, Y. L.; Cheng, Q.; Güngör, C.; Song, L. M.; Xu, Y. P.; Cao, X. L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C. Z.; Zhang, S.; Qu, J. L.; Bu, Q. C.; Cai, C.; Chen, G.; Chen, L.; Chen, M. Z.; Chen, T. X.; Chen, Y. B.; Cui, W.; Cui, W. W.; Deng, J. K.; Dong, Y. W.; Du, Y. Y.; Fu, M. X.; Gao, G. H.; Gao, H.; Gao, M.; Gu, Y. D.; Guan, J.; Guo, C. C.; Han, D. W.; Hao, L. F.; Huo, J.; Jia, S. M.; Jiang, L. H.; Jiang, W. C.; Jin, C. J.; Jin, J.; Jin, Y. J.; Kong, L. D.; Li, B.; Li, D.; Li, C. K.; Li, G.; Li, M. S.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Li, X. B.; Li, X. F.; Li, Y. G.; Li, Z. W.; Li, Z. X.; Liu, Z. Y.; Liang, X. H.; Liao, J. Y.; Liu, G. Q.; Liu, H. W.; Liu, X. J.; Liu, Y. N.; Lu, B.; Lu, X. F.; Luo, Q.; Luo, T.; Ma, X.; Meng, B.; Nang, Y.; Nie, J. Y.; Ou, G.; Sai, N.; Shang, R. C.; Song, X. Y.; Sun, L.; Tan, Y.; Tao, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, G. F.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. B.; Wang, M.; Wang, N.; Wang, W. S.; Wang, Y. D.; Wang, Y. S.; Wen, X. Y.; Wen, Z. G.; Wu, B. B.; Wu, B. Y.; Wu, M.; Xiao, G. C.; Xiao, S.; Xiong, S. L.; Xu, Y. H.; Yan, W. M.; Yang, J. W.; Yang, S.; Yang, Y. J.; Yang, Y. J.; Yi, Q. B.; Yin, Q. Q.; You, Y.; Yue, Y. L.; Zhang, A. M.; Zhang, C. M.; Zhang, D. P.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, H. M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, W. C.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, W. Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. F.; Zhang, Y. J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z. L.; Zhao, H. S.; Zhao, X. F.; Zheng, W.; Zhou, D. K.; Zhou, J. F.; Zhou, X.; Zhuang, R. L.; Zhu, Y. X.; Zhu, Y.
Comments: 25 pages, 8 figures
Submitted: 2020-04-01
Glitches correspond to sudden jumps of rotation frequency ($\nu$) and its derivative ($\dot{\nu}$) of pulsars, the origin of which remains not well understood yet, partly because the jump processes of most glitches are not well time-resolved. There are three large glitches of the Crab pulsar, detected in 1989, 1996 and 2017, which were found to have delayed spin-up processes before the normal recovery processes. Here we report two additional glitches of the Crab pulsar occurred in 2004 and 2011 for which we discovered delayed spin up processes, and present refined parameters of the largest glitch occurred in 2017. The initial rising time of the glitch is determined as $<0.48$ hour. We also carried out a statistical study of these five glitches with observed spin-up processes. The two glitches occurred in 2004 and 2011 have delayed spin-up time scales ($\tau_{1}$) of $1.7\pm0.8$\,days and $1.6\pm0.4$\,days, respectively. We find that the $\Delta{\nu}$ vs. $|\Delta{\dot\nu}|$ relation of these five glitches is similar to those with no detected delayed spin-up process, indicating that they are similar to the others in nature except that they have larger amplitudes. For these five glitches, the amplitudes of the delayed spin-up process ($|\Delta{\nu}_{\rm d1}|$) and recovery process ($\Delta{\nu}_{\rm d2}$), their time scales ($\tau_{1}$, $\tau_{2}$), and permanent changes in spin frequency ($\Delta{\nu}_{\rm p}$) and total frequency step ($\Delta{\nu}_{\rm g}$) have positive correlations. From these correlations, we suggest that the delayed spin-up processes are common for all glitches, but are too short and thus difficult to be detected for most glitches.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.10889  [pdf] - 2097371
A search for prompt gamma-ray counterparts to fast radio bursts in the Insight-HXMT data
Comments: 15 pages, 3 figures, 6 tables, accepted by A&A
Submitted: 2020-03-24
No robust detection of prompt electromagnetic counterparts to fast radio bursts (FRBs) has yet been obtained, in spite of several multi-wavelength searches carried out so far. Specifically, X/gamma-ray counterparts are predicted by some models. We planned on searching for prompt gamma-ray counterparts in the Insight-Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (Insight-HXMT) data, taking advantage of the unique combination of large effective area in the keV-MeV energy range and of sub-ms time resolution. We selected 39 FRBs that were promptly visible from the High-Energy (HE) instrument aboard Insight-HXMT. After calculating the expected arrival times at the location of the spacecraft, we searched for a significant excess in both individual and cumulative time profiles over a wide range of time resolutions, from several seconds down to sub-ms scales. Using the dispersion measures in excess of the Galactic terms, we estimated the upper limits on the redshifts. No convincing signal was found and for each FRB we constrained the gamma-ray isotropic-equivalent luminosity and the released energy as a function of emission timescale. For the nearest FRB source, the periodic repeater FRB180916.J0158+65, we find $L_{\gamma,iso}<5.5\times 10^{47}$ erg/s over 1 s, whereas $L_{\gamma,iso}<10^{49}-10^{51}$ erg/s for the bulk of FRBs. The same values scale up by a factor of ~100 for a ms-long emission. Even on a timescale comparable with that of the radio pulse itself no keV-MeV emission is observed. A systematic association with either long or short GRBs is ruled out with high confidence, except for subluminous events, as is the case for core-collapse of massive stars (long) or binary neutron star mergers (short) viewed off axis. Only giant flares from extra-galactic magnetars at least ten times more energetic than Galactic siblings are ruled out for the nearest FRB.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.09613  [pdf] - 2064363
Overview to the Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (Insight-HXMT) Satellite
Zhang, ShuangNan; Li, TiPei; Lu, FangJun; Song, LiMing; Xu, YuPeng; Liu, CongZhan; Chen, Yong; Cao, XueLei; Bu, QingCui; Cai, Ce; Chang, Zhi; Chen, Gang; Chen, Li; Chen, TianXiang; Chen, Wei; Chen, YiBao; Chen, YuPeng; Cui, Wei; Cui, WeiWei; Deng, JingKang; Dong, YongWei; Du, YuanYuan; Fu, MinXue; Gao, GuanHua; Gao, He; Gao, Min; Ge, MingYu; Gu, YuDong; Guan, Ju; Gungor, Can; Guo, ChengCheng; Han, DaWei; Hu, Wei; Huang, Yan; Huang, Yue; Huo, Jia; Jia, ShuMei; Jiang, LuHua; Jiang, WeiChun; Jin, Jing; Jin, YongJie; Kong, Lingda; Li, Bing; Li, ChengKui; Li, Gang; Li, MaoShun; Li, Wei; Li, Xian; Li, XiaoBo; Li, XuFang; Li, YanGuo; Li, ZiJian; Li, ZhengWei; Liang, XiaoHua; Liao, JinYuan; Liu, Baisheng; Liu, GuoQing; Liu, HongWei; Liu, ShaoZhen; Liu, XiaoJing; Liu, Yuan; Liu, YiNong; Lu, Bo; Lu, XueFeng; Luo, Qi; Luo, Tao; Ma, Xiang; Meng, Bin; Nang, Yi; Nie, JianYin; Ou, Ge; Qu, JinLu; Sai, Na; Shang, RenCheng; Shen, GuoHong; Song, XinYing; Sun, Liang; Tan, Ying; Tao, Lian; Tao, WenHui; Tuo, YouLi; Wang, ChunQin; Wang, GuoFeng; Wang, HuanYu; Wang, Juan; Wang, WenShuai; Wang, YuSa; Wen, XiangYang; Wu, BoBing; Wu, Mei; Xiao, GuangCheng; Xiao, Shuo; Xiong, ShaoLin; Xu, He; Yan, LinLi; Yang, JiaWei; Yang, Sheng; Yang, YanJi; Yi, Qibin; Yu, JiaXi; Yuan, Bin; Zhang, AiMei; Zhang, ChunLei; Zhang, ChengMo; Zhang, Fan; Zhang, HongMei; Zhang, Juan; Zhang, Liang; Zhang, Qiang; Zhang, ShenYi; Zhang, Shu; Zhang, Tong; Zhang, Wei; Zhang, WanChang; Zhang, WenZhao; Zhang, Yi; Zhang, Yue; Zhang, YiFei; Zhang, YongJie; Zhang, Zhao; Zhang, Zhi; Zhang, ZiLiang; Zhao, HaiSheng; Zhao, JianLing; Zhao, XiaoFan; Zheng, ShiJie; Zhu, Yue; Zhu, YuXuan; Zhuang, Renlin; Zou, ChangLin
Comments: 29 pages, 40 figures, 6 tables, to appear in Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1910.04434
Submitted: 2019-10-21
As China's first X-ray astronomical satellite, the Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (HXMT), which was dubbed as Insight-HXMT after the launch on June 15, 2017, is a wide-band (1-250 keV) slat-collimator-based X-ray astronomy satellite with the capability of all-sky monitoring in 0.2-3 MeV. It was designed to perform pointing, scanning and gamma-ray burst (GRB) observations and, based on the Direct Demodulation Method (DDM), the image of the scanned sky region can be reconstructed. Here we give an overview of the mission and its progresses, including payload, core sciences, ground calibration/facility, ground segment, data archive, software, in-orbit performance, calibration, background model, observations and some preliminary results.