Normalized to: Zhu, H.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.05240 [pdf] - 2131974
LAMOST Medium-Resolution Spectral Survey of Galactic Nebula (LAMOST
MRS-N): An overview of Scientific goals and Survey plan
Wu, Chao-Jian;
Wu, Hong;
Zhang, Wei;
Ren, Juan-Juan;
Chen, Jian-Jun;
Hsia, Chih-Hao;
Wu, Yu-Zhong;
Zhu, Hui;
Li, Bin;
Hou, Yong-Hui;
Wang, Jun-Lin;
Yu, Shuo-Ran;
Collaboration, LAMOST MRS
Submitted: 2020-07-10
Since Sep. 2018, LAMOST started the medium-resolution (R $\sim 7500$)
spectral survey (MRS). We proposed the spectral survey of Galactic nebulae,
including \hii\ regions, HH objects, supernova remnants, planetary nebulae and
the special stars with MRS (LAMOST MRS-N). LAMOST MRS-N covers about 1700
square degrees of the northern Galactic plane within $40^\circ < l < 215^\circ$
and $-5^\circ < b < 5^\circ$. In this 5-year survey, we plan to observe about
500 thousand nebulae spectra. According to the commissioning observations, the
nebulae spectra can provide precise radial velocity with uncertainty less than
1 km s$^{-1}$. These high-precision spectral data are of great significance to
our understanding of star formation and evolution.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.14946 [pdf] - 2122761
Hadronic vs leptonic models for $\gamma$-ray emission from VER J2227+608
Submitted: 2020-06-24
Recent observations of VER J2227+608 reveal a broken power $\gamma$-ray
spectrum with the spectral index increasing from $\sim 1.8$ in the GeV energy
range to $\sim 2.3$ in the TeV range. Such a spectral break can be attributed
to radiative energy loss of energetic electrons in the leptonic scenario for
the $\gamma$-ray emission, which, in combination with characteristic age of the
nearby pulsar, can be used to constrain magnetic field in the emission region.
We show that the radio and X-ray observations can also be explained in such a
scenario. In the hadronic scenario, the spectral break can be attributed to
diffusion of energetic ions in a turbulent medium and detailed spectral
measurement can be used to constrain the diffusion coefficient. These two
models, however, predict drastically different spectra above 100 TeV, which
will be uncovered with future high-resolution observations, such as LHAASO
and/or CTA.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07383 [pdf] - 2114304
Quantifying the Line-of-Sight Halo Contribution to the Dark Matter
Convergence Power Spectrum from Strong Gravitational Lenses
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Galaxy-galaxy strong gravitational lenses have become a popular probe of dark
matter (DM) by providing a window into structure formation on the smallest
scales. In particular, the convergence power spectrum of subhalos within
lensing galaxies has been suggested as a promising observable to study DM.
However, the distances involved in strong-lensing systems are vast, and we
expect the relevant volume to contain line-of-sight (LOS) halos that are not
associated with the main lens. We develop a formalism to calculate the effect
of LOS halos as an effective convergence power spectrum. The multi-lens plane
equation couples the angular deflections of consecutive lens planes, but by
assuming that the perturbations due to the LOS halos are small, we show that
they can be projected onto the main-lens plane as effective subhalos. We test
our formalism by simulating lensing systems using the full multi-plane lens
equation and find excellent agreement. We show how the relative contribution of
LOS halos and subhalos depends on the source and lens redshift, as well as the
assumed halo and subhalo mass functions. For a fiducial system with fraction of
DM halo mass in substructure $f_{\rm sub}=0.4\%$ for subhalo masses
$[10^5-10^8]\rm{M}_{\odot}$, the interloper contribution to the power spectrum
is at least several times greater than that of subhalos for source redshifts
$z_s\gtrsim0.5$. Furthermore, it is likely that for the SLACS and BELLS lenses
the interloper contribution dominates: $f_{\rm sub}\gtrsim2\%$ ($4\%$) is
needed for subhalos to dominate in SLACS (BELLS), which is higher than current
upper bounds on $f_{\rm sub}$ for our mass range. Since the halo mass function
is better understood from first principles, the dominance of interlopers in
galaxy-galaxy lenses with high-quality imaging can be seen as a significant
advantage when translating this observable into a constraint on DM.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.02318 [pdf] - 2080898
Reconstruction with velocities
Submitted: 2019-10-05, last modified: 2020-04-07
Reconstruction is becoming a crucial procedure of galaxy clustering analysis
for future spectroscopic redshift surveys to obtain subpercent level
measurement of the baryon acoustic oscillation scale. Most reconstruction
algorithms rely on an estimation of the displacement field from the observed
galaxy distribution. However, the displacement reconstruction degrades near the
survey boundary due to incomplete data and the boundary effects extend to
$\sim100\,\mathrm{Mpc}/h$ within the interior of the survey volume. We study
the possibility of using radial velocities measured from the cosmic microwave
background observation through the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect to
improve performance near the boundary. We find that the boundary effect can be
reduced to $\sim30-40\,\mathrm{Mpc}/h$ with the velocity information from
Simons Observatory. This is especially helpful for dense low redshift surveys
where the volume is relatively small and a large fraction of total volume is
affected by the boundary.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.01038 [pdf] - 2057968
Gravitational couplings in Chameleon models
Submitted: 2020-03-02
We consider cosmological models where dark energy is described by a dynamical
field equipped with the Chameleon screening mechanism, which serves to hide its
effects in local dense regions and to conform to Solar System observations. In
these models, there is no universal gravitational coupling and here we study
the effective couplings that determine the force between massive objects,
$G_N$, and the propagation of gravitational waves, $G_{gw}$. In particular, we
revisit the Chameleon screening mechanism without neglecting the time
dependence of the galactic environment where local regions are embedded in, and
analyze the induced time evolution on $G_N$ and $G_{gw}$, which can be tested
with Lunar Laser Ranging and direct gravitational waves observations. We
explicitly show how and why these two couplings generically differ. We also
find that due to the particular way the Chameleon screening mechanism works,
their time evolutions are highly suppressed in the weak-field non-relativistic
approximation.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.00361 [pdf] - 2049096
Measuring dark matter-neutrino relative velocity on cosmological scales
Submitted: 2019-05-01, last modified: 2020-02-15
We present a new method to measure neutrino masses using the dark
matter-neutrino relative velocity. The relative motion between dark matter and
neutrinos results in a parity-odd bispectrum which can be measured from
cross-correlation of different cosmic fields. This new method is not affected
by most systematics which are parity even and not limited by the knowledge of
optical depth to the cosmic microwave background. We estimate the detectability
of the relative velocity effect and find that the minimal sum of neutrino
masses could be detected at high significance with upcoming surveys.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.02233 [pdf] - 2027940
Cosmic Reionization On Computers: The Galaxy-Halo Connection between $5
\leq z \leq10$
Submitted: 2020-01-07
We explore the connection between the stellar component of galaxies and their
host halos during the epoch of reionization ($5 \leq z\leq10$) using the CROC
(Cosmic Reionization on Computers) simulations. We compare simulated galaxies
with observations and find that CROC underpredicts the abundance of luminous
galaxies when compared to observed UV luminosity functions, and analogously the
most massive galaxies when compared to observed stellar mass functions. We can
trace the deficit of star formation to high redshifts, where the slope of the
star formation rate to stellar mass relation is consistent with observations,
but the normalization is systematically low. This results in a star formation
rate density and stellar mass density that is systematically offset from
observations. However, the less luminous or lower stellar mass objects have
luminosities and stellar masses that agree fairly well with observational data.
We explore the stellar-to-halo mass ratio, a key quantity that is difficult to
measure at high redshifts and that models do not consistently predict. In CROC,
the stellar-to-halo mass ratio {\it decreases} with redshift, a trend opposite
to some abundance matching studies. These discrepancies uncover where future
effort should be focused in order to improve the fidelity of modeling cosmic
reionization. We also compare the CROC galaxy bias with observational
measurements using Lyman-Break Galaxy (LBG) samples. The good agreement of
simulation and data shows that the clustering of dark matter halos is properly
captured in CROC.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.08217 [pdf] - 2021195
Nonlinear Reconstruction of the Velocity Field
Submitted: 2019-08-22, last modified: 2019-12-30
We propose a new velocity reconstruction method based on the displacement
estimation by recently developed methods. The velocity is first reconstructed
by transfer functions in Lagrangian space and then mapped into Eulerian space.
High resolution simulations are used to test the performance. We find that the
new reconstruction method outperforms the standard velocity reconstruction in
the sense of better cross-correlation coefficient, less velocity misalignment
and smaller amplitude difference. We conclude that this new method has the
potential to improve the large-scale structure sciences involving a velocity
reconstruction, such as kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich measurement and supernova
cosmology.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.06179 [pdf] - 2006565
Cosmic Reionization On Computers: Reionization Histories of Present-day
Galaxies
Submitted: 2019-03-14, last modified: 2019-11-28
We examine the reionization history of present-day galaxies by explicitly
tracing the building blocks of halos from the Cosmic Reionization On Computers
project. We track dark matter particles that belong to $z=0$ halos to trace the
neutral fractions at corresponding positions during rapid global reionization.
The resulting particle reionization histories allow us to explore different
definitions of a halo's reionization redshift and to account for the neutral
content of the interstellar medium. Consistent with previous work, we find a
systematic trend of reionization redshift with mass - present day halos with
higher masses have earlier reionization times. Finally, we quantify the spread
of reionization times within each halo, which also has a mass dependence.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02322 [pdf] - 1950521
Automated Lensing Learner: Automated Strong Lensing Identification with
a Computer Vision Technique
Submitted: 2017-04-07, last modified: 2019-08-27
Forthcoming surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) and
Euclid necessitate automatic and efficient identification methods of strong
lensing systems. We present a strong lensing identification approach that
utilizes a feature extraction method from computer vision, the Histogram of
Oriented Gradients (HOG), to capture edge patterns of arcs. We train a
supervised classifier model on the HOG of mock strong galaxy-galaxy lens images
similar to observations from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and LSST. We
assess model performance with the area under the curve (AUC) of a Receiver
Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Models trained on 10,000 lens and
non-lens containing images images exhibit an AUC of 0.975 for an HST-like
sample, 0.625 for one exposure of LSST, and 0.809 for 10-year mock LSST
observations. Performance appears to continually improve with the training set
size. Models trained on fewer images perform better in absence of the lens
galaxy light. However, with larger training data sets, information from the
lens galaxy actually improves model performance, indicating that HOG captures
much of the morphological complexity of the arc finding problem. We test our
classifier on data from the Sloan Lens ACS Survey and find that small scale
image features reduces the efficiency of our trained model. However, these
preliminary tests indicate that some parameterizations of HOG can compensate
for differences between observed mock data. One example best-case
parameterization results in an AUC of 0.6 in the F814 filter image with other
parameterization results equivalent to random performance.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.00125 [pdf] - 2025437
Identifying Solar Flare Precursors Using Time Series of SDO/HMI Images
and SHARP Parameters
Chen, Yang;
Manchester, Ward B.;
Hero, Alfred O.;
Toth, Gabor;
DuFumier, Benoit;
Zhou, Tian;
Wang, Xiantong;
Zhu, Haonan;
Sun, Zeyu;
Gombosi, Tamas I.
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-08-03
We present several methods towards construction of precursors, which show
great promise towards early predictions, of solar flare events in this paper. A
data pre-processing pipeline is built to extract useful data from multiple
sources, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) and Solar
Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI), to prepare
inputs for machine learning algorithms. Two classification models are
presented: classification of flares from quiet times for active regions and
classification of strong versus weak flare events. We adopt deep learning
algorithms to capture both the spatial and temporal information from HMI
magnetogram data. Effective feature extraction and feature selection with raw
magnetogram data using deep learning and statistical algorithms enable us to
train classification models to achieve almost as good performance as using
active region parameters provided in HMI/Space-Weather HMI-Active Region Patch
(SHARP) data files. Case studies show a significant increase in the prediction
score around 20 hours before strong solar flare events.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.06213 [pdf] - 1966852
Dust destruction in non-radiative shocks
Submitted: 2019-07-14, last modified: 2019-07-29
Supernova remnant (SNR) shock waves are the main place where interstellar
dust grains are destroyed. However, the dust destruction efficiency in
non-radiative shocks is still not well known. One way to estimate the fraction
of dust destroyed is to compare the difference between postshock gas abundances
and preshock medium total abundances when the preshock elemental depletion
factors are known. We compare the postshock gas abundances of 16 SNRs in Large
Magellanic Cloud (LMC) with the LMC interstellar medium abundances that we
derived based on 69 slow-rotating early B-type stars. We find that, on average,
$\sim$61\% of Si rich dust grains are destroyed in the shock while the fraction
of dust destroyed is only $\sim$40\% for Fe rich dust grains. This result
supports the idea that the high depletion of Fe in the diffuse neutral medium
is not caused by the resilience of Fe rich grains but because of faster growth
rate. This work also presents a potential way to constrain the chemical
composition of interstellar dust.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12295 [pdf] - 1966904
The kinematic distances of SNR G16.7+0.1 and G15.9+0.2 by analyzing HI
absorption spectra
Submitted: 2019-07-29
We build HI absorption spectra towards Supernova Remnant (SNRs) G16.7+0.1 and
G15.9+0.2 using the THOR survey data. With the absorption spectra, we give a
new distance range of 7 to 16 kpc for G15.9+0.2. We also resolve the
near/far-side distance ambiguity of G16,7+0.1 and confirm its kinematic
distance of about 14 kpc. In addition, we analyze the CO (J=3-2) spectra
towards G16.7+0.1 and find obvious CO emission at the 20 kms$^{-1}$ OH 1720 MHz
maser site. This supports Reynoso and Mangum (2000)'s suggestions that the
velocity difference between the maser and southern molecular cloud is caused by
the shock acceleration. We discuss the impact of the distances on other
physical parameters of the two SNRs.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.02773 [pdf] - 1931449
The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) Science White
Paper
Bai, X.;
Bi, B. Y.;
Bi, X. J.;
Cao, Z.;
Chen, S. Z.;
Chen, Y.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cui, X. H.;
Dai, Z. G.;
della Volpe, D.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Sciascio, Giuseppe;
Fan, Y. Z.;
Giacalone, J.;
Guo, Y. Q.;
He, H. H.;
He, T. L.;
Heller, M.;
Huang, D.;
Huang, Y. F.;
Jia, H.;
Ksenofontov, L. T.;
Leahy, D.;
Li, F.;
Li, Z.;
Liang, E. W.;
Lipari, P.;
Liu, R. Y.;
Liu, Y.;
Liu, S.;
Ma, X.;
Martineau-Huynh, O.;
Martraire, D.;
Montaruli, T.;
Ruffolo, D.;
Stenkin, Y. V.;
Su, H. Q.;
Tam, T.;
Tang, Q. W.;
Tian, W. W.;
Vallania, P.;
Vernetto, S.;
Vigorito, C.;
Wang, J. . C.;
Wang, L. Z.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, X. Y.;
Wang, X. J.;
Wang, Z. X.;
Wei, D. M.;
Wei, J. J.;
Wu, D.;
Wu, H. R.;
Wu, X. F.;
Yan, D. H.;
Yang, A. Y.;
Yang, R. Z.;
Yao, Z. G.;
Yin, L. Q.;
Yuan, Q.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M. F.;
Zhang, S. S.;
Zhang, X.;
Zhao, Y.;
Zhou, X. X.;
Zhu, F. R.;
Zhu, H.
Submitted: 2019-05-07
The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) project is a new
generation multi-component instrument, to be built at 4410 meters of altitude
in the Sichuan province of China, with the aim to study with unprecedented
sensitivity the spec trum, the composition and the anisotropy of cosmic rays in
the energy range between 10$^{12}$ and 10$^{18}$ eV, as well as to act
simultaneously as a wide aperture (one stereoradiant), continuously-operated
gamma ray telescope in the energy range between 10$^{11}$ and $10^{15}$ eV. The
experiment will be able of continuously surveying the TeV sky for steady and
transient sources from 100 GeV to 1 PeV, t hus opening for the first time the
100-1000 TeV range to the direct observations of the high energy cosmic ray
sources. In addition, the different observables (electronic, muonic and
Cherenkov/fluorescence components) that will be measured in LHAASO will allow
to investigate origin, acceleration and propagation of the radiation through a
measurement of energy spec trum, elemental composition and anisotropy with
unprecedented resolution. The remarkable sensitivity of LHAASO in cosmic rays
physics and gamma astronomy would play a key-role in the comprehensive general
program to explore the High Energy Universe. LHAASO will allow important
studies of fundamental physics (such as indirect dark matter search, Lorentz
invariance violation, quantum gravity) and solar and heliospheric physics. In
this document we introduce the concept of LHAASO and the main science goals,
providing an overview of the project.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09208 [pdf] - 1854198
Inflation and Dark Energy from spectroscopy at $z > 2$
Ferraro, Simone;
Wilson, Michael J.;
Abidi, Muntazir;
Alonso, David;
Ansarinejad, Behzad;
Armstrong, Robert;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Avelino, Arturo;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Bandura, Kevin;
Battaglia, Nicholas;
Bavdhankar, Chetan;
Bernal, José Luis;
Beutler, Florian;
Biagetti, Matteo;
Blanc, Guillermo A.;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Borrill, Julian;
Frye, Brenda;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Bull, Philip;
Burgess, Cliff;
Byrnes, Christian T.;
Cai, Zheng;
Castander, Francisco J;
Castorina, Emanuele;
Chang, Tzu-Ching;
Chaves-Montero, Jonás;
Chen, Shi-Fan;
Chen, Xingang;
Balland, Christophe;
Yèche, Christophe;
Cohn, J. D.;
Coulton, William;
Courtois, Helene;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
D'Amico, Guido;
Dawson, Kyle;
Delabrouille, Jacques;
Dey, Arjun;
Doré, Olivier;
Douglass, Kelly A.;
Yutong, Duan;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Eggemeier, Alexander;
Eisenstein, Daniel;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Font-Ribera, Andreu;
Foreman, Simon;
García-Bellido, Juan;
Gerbino, Martina;
Gluscevic, Vera;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
Green, Daniel;
Guy, Julien;
Hahn, ChangHoon;
Hanany, Shaul;
Handley, Will;
Hathi, Nimish;
Hawken, Adam J.;
Hernández-Aguayo, César;
Hložek, Renée;
Huterer, Dragan;
Ishak, Mustapha;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Karagiannis, Dionysios;
Keeley, Ryan E.;
Kehoe, Robert;
Khatri, Rishi;
Kim, Alex;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Kollmeier, Juna A.;
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Krolewski, Alex;
L'Huillier, Benjamin;
Landriau, Martin;
Levi, Michael;
Liguori, Michele;
Linder, Eric;
Lukić, Zarija;
de la Macorra, Axel;
Plazas, Andrés A.;
Marshall, Jennifer L.;
Martini, Paul;
Masui, Kiyoshi;
McDonald, Patrick;
Meerburg, P. Daniel;
Meyers, Joel;
Mirbabayi, Mehrdad;
Moustakas, John;
Myers, Adam D.;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Newburgh, Laura;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Niz, Gustavo;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Palunas, Povilas;
Percival, Will J.;
Piacentini, Francesco;
Pieri, Matthew M.;
Piro, Anthony L.;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Rhodes, Jason;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Rossi, Graziano;
Rudie, Gwen C.;
Samushia, Lado;
Sasaki, Misao;
Schaan, Emmanuel;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schmittfull, Marcel;
Schubnell, Michael;
Sehgal, Neelima;
Senatore, Leonardo;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Simon, Joshua D.;
Simon, Sara;
Slepian, Zachary;
Slosar, Anže;
Sridhar, Srivatsan;
Stebbins, Albert;
Escoffier, Stephanie;
Switzer, Eric R.;
Tarlé, Gregory;
Trodden, Mark;
Uhlemann, Cora;
Urenña-López, L. Arturo;
Di Valentino, Eleonora;
Vargas-Magaña, M.;
Wang, Yi;
Watson, Scott;
White, Martin;
Xu, Weishuang;
Yu, Byeonghee;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zheng, Yi;
Zhu, Hong-Ming
Submitted: 2019-03-21
The expansion of the Universe is understood to have accelerated during two
epochs: in its very first moments during a period of Inflation and much more
recently, at $z < 1$, when Dark Energy is hypothesized to drive cosmic
acceleration. The undiscovered mechanisms behind these two epochs represent
some of the most important open problems in fundamental physics. The large
cosmological volume at $2 < z < 5$, together with the ability to efficiently
target high-$z$ galaxies with known techniques, enables large gains in the
study of Inflation and Dark Energy. A future spectroscopic survey can test the
Gaussianity of the initial conditions up to a factor of ~50 better than our
current bounds, crossing the crucial theoretical threshold of
$\sigma(f_{NL}^{\rm local})$ of order unity that separates single field and
multi-field models. Simultaneously, it can measure the fraction of Dark Energy
at the percent level up to $z = 5$, thus serving as an unprecedented test of
the standard model and opening up a tremendous discovery space.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.05616 [pdf] - 1817224
Gravitational redshift profiles of MaNGA BCGs
Submitted: 2019-01-16, last modified: 2019-01-18
The gravitational potential well of an $M>10^{13}$ $M_\odot$ galaxy will lead
to a gravitational redshift differential of order 1 km/s between the galaxy
core and its outskirts. Current surveys of massive galaxies with spatially
resolved spectroscopy have reached a size which makes feasible attempts to
detect gravitational redshifts within galaxies. We use spectra from the Mapping
Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) experiment to attempt a
measurement of the averaged stellar redshift profile of large elliptical
galaxies. We find that systematic effects (possibly related to charge transfer
or wavelength calibration accuracy) make the standard MaNGA data pipeline
unsuitable for measuring the relevant sub km/s wavelength shifts. We therefore
develop a cross-correlation technique to mitigate these effects, but caution
that we are working beyond the design accuracy of the MaNGA experiment. With a
sample of $272$ galaxies in halos with $\log (M/M_\odot)>13$, we attempt a
measurement of the gravitational redshift profile, achieving $1 \sigma$ errors
of size $\sim 0.5$ km/s, but are unable to make a significant detection of the
signal. Even without a detection, our measurement can be used to limit the dark
matter mass within the half light radius of elliptical galaxies to $1.2$ times
the stellar mass, at the 68% confidence level. We also perform weighting scheme
tests and split sample tests, and address target selection issues and other
relativistic effects, including the transverse Doppler effect and relativistic
beaming of stars. Future detections could lead to new constraints on the galaxy
mass distribution that are different from kinematic and lensing determinations
and open a window on galaxy properties and tests of gravity.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.05615 [pdf] - 1817223
Effects of baryons on the gravitational redshift profile of {\Lambda}CDM
halos
Submitted: 2019-01-16
Gravitational redshifts and other relativistic effects are beginning to be
studied in the context of galaxy clustering. Distortions consistent with those
expected in General Relativity have been measured in galaxy cluster redshift
profiles by Wojtak et al. and others and in the the cross-correlation function
of galaxy populations by Alam et al. On scales below ~20 Mpc/$h$ simulations
have shown that gravitational redshift dominates over other effects. However,
this signal is related to the shape and depth of gravitational potentials, and
therefore the matter density in galaxies and galaxy clusters that is
responsible for them. We investigate the effects of baryonic physics on the
gravitational redshift profiles of massive (group and cluster-sized) halos. We
compare the profiles of different components in halos taken from the
MassiveBlack-II cosmological hydrodynamic simulation and a dark matter-only
version of the same simulation. We find that inclusion of baryons, cooling,
star formation and feedback significantly alters the relevant inner density
profiles. These baryonic effects lead to overall increases in both
gravitational redshifts and the transverse relativistic Doppler effects by up
to ~50% for group size halos. We show how modified Navarro Frenk White halo
profiles can be used to parametrize these differences, and provide relevant
halo profile fits.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.02882 [pdf] - 1920816
The Distance Measurements of Supernova Remnants in The Fourth Galactic
Quadrant
Submitted: 2019-01-09
We take advantage of the red clump stars to build the relation of the optical
extinction (AV) and distance in each direction of supernova remnants (SNRs)
with known extinction in the fourth Galactic quadrant. The distances of 9 SNRs
are well determined by this method. Their uncertainties range from 10% to 30%,
which is significantly improved for 8 SNRs, G279.0+1.1, G284.3-1.8, G296.1-0.5,
G299.2-2.9, G308.4-1.4, G309.2-0.6, G309.8- 2.6, G332.4-0.4. In addition, SNR
G284.3-1.8 with the new distance of 5.5 kpc is not likely associated with the
PSR J1016-5857 at 3 kpc.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.07062 [pdf] - 1786847
Recovering lost 21 cm radial modes via cosmic tidal reconstruction
Submitted: 2016-10-22, last modified: 2018-11-16
21 cm intensity mapping has emerged as a promising technique to map the
large-scale structure of the Universe, at redshifts $z$ from 1 to 10.
Unfortunately, many of the key cross-correlations with the cosmic microwave
background and photo-$z$ galaxies have been thought to be impossible due to the
foreground contamination for radial modes with small wave numbers. In this
paper, we apply tidal reconstruction to the simulated 21 cm fields and recover
the lost large-scale radial modes successfully. We estimate the detectability
of the cross-correlation signals and find they can be detected at high
significance with current 21 cm experiments. The tidal field reconstruction
method opens up a new set of possibilities to probe the Universe and is
extremely valuable not only for 21 cm surveys but also for cosmic microwave
background and photometric-redshift observations.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.05012 [pdf] - 1920805
The Cross-correlation of KSZ Effect and 21 cm Intensity Mapping with
Tidal Reconstruction
Submitted: 2018-11-12
We discuss the possibility of studying diffuse baryon distributions with
kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) effect by correlating cosmic microwave
background (CMB) temperature fluctuations with density fluctuations from 21\,cm
intensity mapping (IM). The biggest challenge for the cross-correlation is the
loss of large-scale information in IM, due to foregrounds and the zero spacing
problem of interferometers. We apply the tidal reconstruction algorithm to
restore the lost large-scale modes, which increases the correlation by more
than a factor of three. With the predicted foreground level, we expect a
$\sim20\,\sigma$ detection of kSZ signal for $0.8\lesssim z\lesssim2.5$ with
CHIME and Planck, and a $\sim40\, \sigma$ detection with HIRAX and Planck. The
significance can be greatly increased with next-generation facilities of higher
spatial resolutions.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.06014 [pdf] - 1779708
Distances of Galactic Supernova Remnants Using Red Clump Stars
Submitted: 2018-10-14, last modified: 2018-11-05
We carry out a project to independently measure the distances of supernova
remnants (SNRs) in the first quadrant of the Galaxy. In this project, red clump
(RC) stars are used as standard candles and extinction probes to build the
optical extinction (A$_V$) - distance(D) relation in each direction of
extinction-known SNRs. 15 SNRs' distances are well determined. Among them, the
distances of G65.8-0.5, G66.0-0.0 and G67.6+0.9 are given for the first time.
We also obtain 32 upper/lower limits of distances, and the distances to
G5.7-0.1, G15.1-1.6, G28.8+1.5 and G78.2+2.1 are constrained. Most of the
distances measured by the RC method are consistent with previous results. The
RC method provides an independent access to the distances of SNRs.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.03218 [pdf] - 1633139
Nonlinear reconstruction of redshift space distortions
Submitted: 2017-11-08, last modified: 2018-02-10
We apply nonlinear reconstruction to the dark matter density field in
redshift space and solve for the nonlinear mapping from the initial Lagrangian
position to the final redshift space position. The reconstructed anisotropic
field inferred from the nonlinear displacement correlates with the linear
initial conditions to much smaller scales than the redshift space density
field. The number of linear modes in the density field is improved by a factor
of 30-40 after reconstruction. We thus expect this reconstruction approach to
substantially expand the cosmological information including baryon acoustic
oscillations and redshift space distortions for dense low-redshift large scale
structure surveys including for example SDSS main sample, DESI BGS, and 21 cm
intensity mapping surveys.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.04680 [pdf] - 1606961
Cosmic tidal reconstruction
Submitted: 2015-11-15, last modified: 2017-12-22
The gravitational coupling of a long-wavelength tidal field with small-scale
density fluctuations leads to anisotropic distortions of the locally measured
small-scale matter correlation function. Since the local correlation function
is known to be statistically isotropic in the absence of such tidal
interactions, the tidal distortions can be used to reconstruct the
long-wavelength tidal field and large-scale density field in analogy with the
cosmic microwave background lensing reconstruction. In this paper we present
the theoretical framework of cosmic tidal reconstruction and test the
reconstruction in numerical simulations. We find that the density field on
large scales can be reconstructed with good accuracy and the cross-correlation
coefficient between the reconstructed density field and the original density
field is greater than 0.9 on large scales $(k\lesssim0.1\ h/\mathrm{Mpc})$,
with the filter scale $\sim1.25\ \mathrm{Mpc}/h$. This is useful in the 21cm
intensity mapping survey, where the long-wavelength radial modes are lost due
to a foreground subtraction process.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.09638 [pdf] - 1606978
Nonlinear reconstruction
Submitted: 2016-11-29, last modified: 2017-12-21
We present a direct approach to nonparametrically reconstruct the linear
density field from an observed nonlinear map. We solve for the unique
displacement potential consistent with the nonlinear density and positive
definite coordinate transformation using a multigrid algorithm. We show that we
recover the linear initial conditions up to the nonlinear scale
($r_{\delta_r\delta_L}>0.5$ for $k\lesssim1\ h/\mathrm{Mpc}$) with minimal
computational cost. This reconstruction approach generalizes the linear
displacement theory to fully nonlinear fields, potentially substantially
expanding the baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift space distortions
information content of dense large scale structure surveys, including for
example SDSS main sample and 21cm intensity mapping initiatives.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.04770 [pdf] - 1589672
Disentangling the radio emission of the supernova remnant W51C
Submitted: 2017-10-12, last modified: 2017-11-10
We simulate the evolution of supernova remnant (SNR) W51C. The simulation
shows the existence of a new northeast edge. We present magnetic field
structure of the W51 complex (SNR W51C and two HII regions W51A/B) by employing
the 11 cm survey data of Effelsberg. This new edge is identified and overlaps
with W51A along the line of sight, which gives a new angular diameter of about
37' for the quasi-circular remnant. In addition, we assemble the OH spectral
lines (1612/1665/1720 MHz) towards the complex by employing the newly released
THOR (The HI OH Recombination line survey of Milky Way) data. We find that the
known 1720 MHz OH maser in the W51B/C overlap area is located away from the
detected 1612/1665MHz absorption region. The latter is sitting at the peak of
the HII region G49.2-0.35 within W51B.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.08301 [pdf] - 1582104
Halo nonlinear reconstruction
Submitted: 2017-03-24, last modified: 2017-09-29
We apply the nonlinear reconstruction method to simulated halo fields. For
halo number density $2.77\times 10^{-2}$ $(h^{-1} {\rm Mpc})^{-3}$ at $z=0$,
corresponding to the SDSS main sample density, we find the scale where the
noise saturates the linear signal is improved to $k\gtrsim0.36\ h {\rm
Mpc}^{-1}$, a factor of $2.29$ improvement in scale, or $12$ in number of
linear modes. The improvement is less for higher redshift or lower halo
density. We expect this to substantially improve the BAO accuracy of dense, low
redshift surveys, including the SDSS main sample, 6dFGS and 21cm intensity
mapping initiatives.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07855 [pdf] - 1588747
Relativistic distortions in the large-scale clustering of SDSS-III BOSS
CMASS galaxies
Submitted: 2017-09-22
General relativistic effects have long been predicted to subtly influence the
observed large-scale structure of the universe. The current generation of
galaxy redshift surveys have reached a size where detection of such effects is
becoming feasible. In this paper, we report the first detection of the redshift
asymmetry from the cross-correlation function of two galaxy populations which
is consistent with relativistic effects. The dataset is taken from the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey DR12 CMASS galaxy sample, and we detect the asymmetry at the
$2.7\sigma$ level by applying a shell-averaged estimator to the
cross-correlation function. Our measurement dominates at scales around $10$
h$^{-1}$Mpc, larger than those over which the gravitational redshift profile
has been recently measured in galaxy clusters, but smaller than scales for
which linear perturbation theory is likely to be accurate. The detection
significance varies by 0.5$\sigma$ with the details of our measurement and
tests for systematic effects. We have also devised two null tests to check for
various survey systematics and show that both results are consistent with the
null hypothesis. We measure the dipole moment of the cross-correlation
function, and from this the asymmetry is also detected, at the $2.8 \sigma$
level. The amplitude and scale-dependence of the clustering asymmetries are
approximately consistent with the expectations of General Relativity and a
biased galaxy population, within large uncertainties. We explore theoretical
predictions using numerical simulations in a companion paper.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07856 [pdf] - 1588748
Relativistic Effects on Galaxy Redshift Samples due to Target Selection
Submitted: 2017-09-22
In a galaxy redshift survey the objects to be targeted for spectra are
selected from a photometrically observed sample. The observed magnitudes and
colours of galaxies in this parent sample will be affected by their peculiar
velocities, through relativistic Doppler and relativistic beaming effects. In
this paper we compute the resulting expected changes in galaxy photometry. The
magnitudes of the relativistic effects are a function of redshift, stellar
mass, galaxy velocity and velocity direction. We focus on the CMASS sample from
the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
(BOSS), which is selected on the basis of colour and magnitude. We find that
0.10\% of the sample ($\sim 585$ galaxies) has been scattered into the targeted
region of colour-magnitude space by relativistic effects, and conversely 0.09\%
of the sample ($\sim 532$ galaxies) has been scattered out. Observational
consequences of these effects include an asymmetry in clustering statistics,
which we explore in a companion paper. Here we compute a set of weights which
can be used to remove the effect of modulations introduced into the density
field inferred from a galaxy sample. We conclude by investigating the possible
effects of these relativistic modulation on large scale clustering of the
galaxy sample.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07859 [pdf] - 1588749
N-body simulations of gravitational redshifts and other relativistic
distortions of galaxy clustering
Submitted: 2017-09-22
Large redshift surveys of galaxies and clusters are providing the first
opportunities to search for distortions in the observed pattern of large-scale
structure due to such effects as gravitational redshift. We focus on non-linear
scales and apply a quasi-Newtonian approach using N-body simulations to predict
the small asymmetries in the cross-correlation function of two galaxy different
populations. Following recent work by Bonvin et al., Zhao and Peacock and
Kaiser on galaxy clusters, we include effects which enter at the same order as
gravitational redshift: the transverse Doppler effect, light-cone effects,
relativistic beaming, luminosity distance perturbation and wide-angle effects.
We find that all these effects cause asymmetries in the cross-correlation
functions. Quantifying these asymmetries, we find that the total effect is
dominated by the gravitational redshift and luminosity distance perturbation at
small and large scales, respectively. By adding additional subresolution
modelling of galaxy structure to the large-scale structure information, we find
that the signal is significantly increased, indicating that structure on the
smallest scales is important and should be included. We report on comparison of
our simulation results with measurements from the SDSS/BOSS galaxy redshift
survey in a companion paper.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07854 [pdf] - 1588746
Relativistic asymmetries in the galaxy cross-correlation function
Submitted: 2017-09-22
We study the asymmetry in the two-point cross-correlation function of two
populations of galaxies focusing in particular on the relativistic effects that
include the gravitational redshift. We derive the cross-correlation function on
small and large scales using two different approaches: General Relativistic and
Newtonian perturbation theory. Following recent work by Bonvin et al.,
Gaztanaga et al. and Croft, we calculate the dipole and the shell estimator
with the two procedures and we compare our results. We find that while General
Relativistic Perturbation Theory (GRPT) is able to make predictions of
relativistic effects on very large, obviously linear scales (r > 50 Mpc/h), the
presence of non-linearities physically occurring on much smaller scales (down
to those describing galactic potential wells) can strongly affect the asymmetry
estimators. These can lead to cancellations of the relativistic terms, and sign
changes in the estimators on scales up to r ~ 50 Mpc/h. On the other hand, with
an appropriate non-linear gravitational potential, the results obtained using
Newtonian theory can successfully describe the asymmetry on smaller, non-linear
scales (r < 20 Mpc/h) where gravitational redshift is the dominant term. On
larger scales the asymmetry is much smaller in magnitude, and measurement is
not within reach of current observations. This is in agreement with the
observational results obtained by Gaztnaga et al. and the first detection of
relativistic effects (on (r < 20 Mpc/h) scales) by Alam et al.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.01545 [pdf] - 1580538
Cosmological neutrino simulations at extreme scale
Emberson, J. D.;
Yu, Hao-Ran;
Inman, Derek;
Zhang, Tong-Jie;
Pen, Ue-Li;
Harnois-Deraps, Joachim;
Yuan, Shuo;
Teng, Huan-Yu;
Zhu, Hong-Ming;
Chen, Xuelei;
Xing, Zhi-Zhong
Submitted: 2016-11-04, last modified: 2017-07-28
Constraining neutrino mass remains an elusive challenge in modern physics.
Precision measurements are expected from several upcoming cosmological probes
of large-scale structure. Achieving this goal relies on an equal level of
precision from theoretical predictions of neutrino clustering. Numerical
simulations of the non-linear evolution of cold dark matter and neutrinos play
a pivotal role in this process. We incorporate neutrinos into the cosmological
N-body code CUBEP3M and discuss the challenges associated with pushing to the
extreme scales demanded by the neutrino problem. We highlight code
optimizations made to exploit modern high performance computing architectures
and present a novel method of data compression that reduces the phase-space
particle footprint from 24 bytes in single precision to roughly 9 bytes. We
scale the neutrino problem to the Tianhe-2 supercomputer and provide details of
our production run, named TianNu, which uses 86% of the machine (13,824 compute
nodes). With a total of 2.97 trillion particles, TianNu is currently the
world's largest cosmological N-body simulation and improves upon previous
neutrino simulations by two orders of magnitude in scale. We finish with a
discussion of the unanticipated computational challenges that were encountered
during the TianNu runtime.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.07109 [pdf] - 1585025
The gas-to-extinction ratio and the gas distribution in the Galaxy
Submitted: 2017-06-21, last modified: 2017-07-25
We investigate the relation between the optical extinction ($A_V$) and the
hydrogen column density ($N_H$) determined from X-ray observations of a large
sample of Galactic sightlines toward 35 supernova remnants, 6 planetary
nebulae, and 70 X-ray binaries for which $N_H$ was determined in the literature
with solar abundances. We derive an average ratio of
${N_H}/{A_V}=(2.08\pm0.02)\times10^{21}{\rm H\, cm^{-2}\, mag^{-1}}$ for the
whole Galaxy. We find no correlation between ${N_H}/{A_V}$ and the number
density of hydrogen, the distance away from the Galactic centre, and the
distance above or below the Galactic plane. The ${N_H}/{A_V}$ ratio is
generally invariant across the Galaxy, with
${N_H}/{A_V}=(2.04\pm0.05)\times10^{21}{\rm H\, cm^{-2}\, mag^{-1}}$ for the
1st and 4th Galactic quadrants and ${N_H}/{A_V}=(2.09\pm0.03)\times10^{21}{\rm
H\, cm^{-2}\, mag^{-1}}$ for the 2nd and 3rd Galactic quadrants. We also
explore the distribution of hydrogen in the Galaxy by enlarging our sample with
additional 74 supernova remnants for which both $N_H$ and distances are known.
We find that, between the Galactic radius of 2 kpc to 10 kpc, the vertical
distribution of hydrogen can be roughly described by a Gaussian function with a
scale height of $h=75.5\pm12.4\,{\rm pc}$ and a mid-plane density of
$n_{H}(0)=1.11\pm0.15\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$, corresponding to a total gas surface
density of ${\sum}_{gas}{\sim}7.0\,{M_{\bigodot}}\,{\rm pc^{-2}}$. We also
compile $N_H$ from 19 supernova remnants and 29 X-ray binaries for which $N_H$
was determined with subsolar abundances. We obtain
${N_H}/{A_V}=(2.47\pm0.04)\times10^{21}{\rm H\, cm^{-2}\, mag^{-1}}$ which
exceeds that derived with solar abundances by $\sim$20%. We suggest that in
future studies one may simply scale $N_H$ derived from subsolar abundances by a
factor of $\sim$1.2 when converting to $N_H$ of solar abundances.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.04188 [pdf] - 1585902
The revised distance of supernova remnant G15.4+0.1
Submitted: 2017-07-13
We measure the distance to the supernova remnant G15.4+0.1 which is likely
associated with TeV source HESS J1818-154. We build the neutral hydrogen (HI)
absorption and 13CO spectra to supernova remnant G15.4+0.1 by employing the
data from the Southern Galactic Plane Survey (SGPS) and the HI/OH/Recombination
line survey (THOR). The maximum absorption velocity of about 140 km/s
constrains its lower limit distance of about 8.0 kpc. Further, the fact that
the HI emission feature at about 95 km/s seems no corresponding absorption
suggests that G15.4+0.1 has likely an upper limit distance of about 10.5 kpc.
13CO spectrum to the remnant supports our measurement. The new distance revises
parameters on its associated pulsar wind nebula and TeV source.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.09742 [pdf] - 1582200
Isobaric Reconstruction of the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation
Submitted: 2017-03-28, last modified: 2017-05-16
In this paper, we report a significant recovery of the linear baryonic
acoustic oscillation (BAO) signature by applying the isobaric reconstruction
algorithm to the non-linear matter density field. Assuming only the
longitudinal component of the displacement being cosmologically relevant, this
algorithm iteratively solves the coordinate transform between the Lagrangian
and Eulerian frames without requiring any specific knowledge of the dynamics.
For dark matter field, it produces the non-linear displacement potential with
very high fidelity. The reconstruction error at the pixel level is within a few
percent, and is caused only by the emergence of the transverse component after
the shell-crossing. As it circumvents the strongest non-linearity of the
density evolution, the reconstructed field is well-described by linear theory
and immune from the bulk-flow smearing of the BAO signature. Therefore this
algorithm could significantly improve the measurement accuracy of the sound
horizon scale. For a perfect large-scale structure survey at redshift zero
without Poisson or instrumental noise, the fractional error is reduced by a
factor of 2.7, very close to the ideal limit with linear power spectrum and
Gaussian covariance matrix.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.07112 [pdf] - 1538402
Nonlinear $E$-mode clustering in Lagrangian space
Submitted: 2016-10-22, last modified: 2017-02-14
We study the nonlinear $E$-mode clustering in Lagrangian space by using large
scale structure $N$-body simulations and use the displacement field information
in Lagrangian space to recover the primordial linear density field. We find
that, compared to Eulerian nonlinear density fields, the $E$-mode displacement
fields in Lagrangian space improves the cross-correlation scale $k$ with
initial density field by a factor of 6-7, containing two orders of magnitude
more primordial information. This illustrates ability of potential density
reconstruction algorithms, to improve the baryonic acoustic oscillation
measurements from current and future large scale structure surveys.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.09354 [pdf] - 1567599
Measurement of the Cold Dark Matter-Neutrino Dipole in the TianNu
Simulation
Submitted: 2016-10-28
Measurements of neutrino mass in cosmological observations rely on two point
statistics that are hindered by significant degeneracies with the optical depth
and galaxy bias. The relative velocity effect between cold dark matter and
neutrinos induces a large scale dipole into the matter density field and may be
able to provide orthogonal constraints to standard techniques. We numerically
investigate this dipole in the TianNu Simulation, which contains cold dark
matter and 50 meV neutrinos. We first compute the dipole using a new linear
response technique where we treat the displacement caused by the relative
velocity as a phase in Fourier space and then integrate the matter power
spectrum over redshift. Then, we compute the dipole numerically in real space
using the simulation density and velocity fields. We find excellent agreement
between the linear response and N-body methods. Utilizing the dipole as an
observational tool will require two tracers of the matter distribution that are
differently biased with respect to the neutrino density.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.08968 [pdf] - 1858860
Differential Neutrino Condensation onto Cosmic Structure
Yu, Hao-Ran;
Emberson, J. D.;
Inman, Derek;
Zhang, Tong-Jie;
Pen, Ue-Li;
Harnois-Déraps, Joachim;
Yuan, Shuo;
Teng, Huan-Yu;
Zhu, Hong-Ming;
Chen, Xuelei;
Xing, Zhi-Zhong;
Du, Yunfei;
Zhang, Lilun;
Lu, Yutong;
Liao, XiangKe
Submitted: 2016-09-28
Astrophysical techniques have pioneered the discovery of neutrino mass
properties. Current cosmological observations give an upper bound on neutrino
masses by attempting to disentangle the small neutrino contribution from the
sum of all matter using precise theoretical models. We discover the
differential neutrino condensation effect in our TianNu N-body simulation.
Neutrino masses can be inferred using this effect by comparing galaxy
properties in regions of the universe with different neutrino relative
abundance (i.e. the local neutrino to cold dark matter density ratio). In
"neutrino-rich"' regions, more neutrinos can be captured by massive halos
compared to "neutrino-poor" regions. This effect differentially skews the halo
mass function and opens up the path to independent neutrino mass measurements
in current or future galaxy surveys.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07041 [pdf] - 1485196
Primordial density and BAO reconstruction
Submitted: 2016-09-22
We present a new method to reconstruct the primordial (linear) density field
using the estimated nonlinear displacement field. The divergence of the
displacement field gives the reconstructed density field. We solve the
nonlinear displacement field in the 1D cosmology and show the reconstruction
results. The new reconstruction algorithm recovers a lot of linear modes and
reduces the nonlinear damping scale significantly. The successful 1D
reconstruction results imply the new algorithm should also be a promising
technique in the 3D case.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.1660 [pdf] - 1403666
Probing Neutrino Hierarchy and Chirality via Wakes
Submitted: 2014-12-04, last modified: 2016-05-09
The relic neutrinos are expected to acquire a bulk relative velocity with
respect to the dark matter at low redshifts, and neutrino wakes are expected to
develop downstream of the dark matter halos. We propose a method of measuring
the neutrino mass based on this mechanism. This neutrino wake will cause a
dipole distortion of the galaxy-galaxy lensing pattern. This effect could be
detected by combining upcoming lensing surveys with a low redshift galaxy
survey or a 21 cm intensity mapping survey, which can map the neutrino flow
field. The data obtained with LSST and Euclid should enable us to make a
positive detection if the three neutrino masses are quasidegenerate with each
neutrino mass of $\sim$0.1 eV, and a future high precision 21 cm lensing survey
would allow the normal hierarchy and inverted hierarchy cases to be
distinguished, and even the right-handed Dirac neutrinos may be detectable.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.3422 [pdf] - 1403661
Measurement of Neutrino Masses from Relative Velocities
Submitted: 2013-11-14, last modified: 2016-05-09
We present a new technique to measure neutrino masses using their flow field
relative to dark matter. Present day streaming motions of neutrinos relative to
dark matter and baryons are several hundred km/s, comparable with their thermal
velocity dispersion. This results in a unique dipole anisotropic distortion of
the matter-neutrino cross power spectrum, which is observable through the
dipole distortion in the cross correlation of different galaxy populations.
Such a dipole vanishes if not for this relative velocity and so it is a clean
signature for neutrino mass. We estimate the size of this effect and find that
current and future galaxy surveys may be sensitive to these signature
distortions.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.03269 [pdf] - 1385447
Kinematic Distance of Galactic Planetary Nebulae
Submitted: 2016-01-13
We construct \HI~absorption spectra for 18 planetary nebulae (PNe) and their
background sources using the data from the International Galactic Plane Survey.
We estimate the kinematic distances of these PNe, among which 15 objects'
kinematic distances are obtained for the first time. The distance uncertainties
of 13 PNe range from 10% to 50%, which is a significant improvement with
uncertainties of a factor two or three smaller than most of previous distance
measurements. We confirm that PN G030.2-00.1 is not a PN because of its large
distance found here.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.02788 [pdf] - 1247569
Suzaku observation and distance of supernova remnant G332.5-5.6
Submitted: 2015-07-10, last modified: 2015-07-15
We analyze the Suzaku XIS data of the central region of supernova remnant
G332.5-5.6. The X-ray data are well described by a single non-equilibrium
ionization thermal model, {\tt vnei}, with an absorbing hydrogen column density
of 1.4$^{+0.4}_{-0.1}$ $\times$ 10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$. The plasma is
characterized by an electron temperature of 0.49$^{+0.08}_{-0.06}$ keV with
subsolar abundances for O (0.58$^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$ solar value) and Fe
(0.72$^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$ solar value) and slightly overabundance for Mg
(1.23$^{+0.14}_{-0.14}$ solar value). It seems that the central X-ray emission
originates from projection effect or evaporation of residual clouds inside
G332.5-5.6. We estimate a distance of 3.0 $\pm$ 0.8 kpc for G332.5-5.6 based on
the extinction-distance relation. G332.5-5.6 has an age of 7 - 9 kyr.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.04645 [pdf] - 923523
Investigations of supernovae and supernova remnants in the era of SKA
Submitted: 2015-01-19
Two main physical mechanisms are used to explain supernova explosions:
thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf(Type Ia) and core collapse of a
massive star (Type II and Type Ib/Ic). Type Ia supernovae serve as distance
indicators that led to the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the
Universe. The exact nature of their progenitor systems however remain unclear.
Radio emission from the interaction between the explosion shock front and its
surrounding CSM or ISM provides an important probe into the progenitor star's
last evolutionary stage. No radio emission has yet been detected from Type Ia
supernovae by current telescopes. The SKA will hopefully detect radio emission
from Type Ia supernovae due to its much better sensitivity and resolution.
There is a 'supernovae rate problem' for the core collapse supernovae because
the optically dim ones are missed due to being intrinsically faint and/or due
to dust obscuration. A number of dust-enshrouded optically hidden supernovae
should be discovered via SKA1-MID/survey, especially for those located in the
innermost regions of their host galaxies. Meanwhile, the detection of
intrinsically dim SNe will also benefit from SKA1. The detection rate will
provide unique information about the current star formation rate and the
initial mass function. A supernova explosion triggers a shock wave which expels
and heats the surrounding CSM and ISM, and forms a supernova remnant (SNR). It
is expected that more SNRs will be discovered by the SKA. This may decrease the
discrepancy between the expected and observed numbers of SNRs. Several SNRs
have been confirmed to accelerate protons, the main component of cosmic rays,
to very high energy by their shocks. This brings us hope of solving the
Galactic cosmic ray origin's puzzle by combining the low frequency (SKA) and
very high frequency (Cherenkov Telescope Array: CTA) bands' observations of
SNRs.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.6211 [pdf] - 920419
Searching for stochastic gravitational waves using data from the two
co-located LIGO Hanford detectors
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Ceron, E. Amado.;
Amariutei, D.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Austin, L.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barnum, S. H.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Bebronne, M.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Belopolski, I.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berliner, J. M.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Bessis, D.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bhadbhade, T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Blom, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Bowers, J.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brannen, C. A.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderó.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castiglia, A.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Chow, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Constanci., M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordier, M.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Da.;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deleeuw, E.;
Deléglise, S.;
Pozzo, W. De.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
Rosa, R. D.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Fiore, L. D.;
Lieto, A. D.;
Palma, I. D.;
Virgilio, A. D.;
Dmitry, K.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, K.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fang, Q.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R.;
Flaminio, R.;
Foley, E.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fujimoto, M. -K.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Gergely, L.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gil-Casanova, S.;
Gill, C.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Griffo, C.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hall, B.;
Hall, E.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Heefner, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Horrom, T.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Hua, Z.;
Huang, V.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Iafrate, J.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
James, E.;
Jang, H.;
Jang, Y. J.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, D.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Hari.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Kasturi, R.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufman, K.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, B. K.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kremin, A.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kucharczyk, C.;
Kudla, S.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nand.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kurdyumov, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lawrie, C.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. -H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J. J.;
Lee, J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. L.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J. B.;
Lhuillier, V.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Litvine, V.;
Liu, F.;
Liu, H.;
Liu, Y.;
Liu, Z.;
Lloyd, D.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macarthur, J.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martini, G.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Mokler, F.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Mori, T.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Nash, T.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R.;
Necula, V.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nishida, E.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oppermann, P.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Larcher, W. Orteg.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Ou, J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Peiris, P.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pindor, B.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poole, V.;
Postiglione, F.;
Poux, C.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Re, V.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rodriguez, C.;
Rodruck, M.;
Roever, C.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Schilling, R.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G. R.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Soden, K.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Sperandio, L.;
Staley, A.;
Steinert, E.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevens, D.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Szeifert, G.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tang, L.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Braack, A. P. M. te.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. va. de.;
Broeck, C. Va. De.;
Putten, S. va. de.;
Sluys, M. V. va. de.;
Heijningen, J. va.;
Veggel, A. A. va.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veitch, J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Verma, S.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vitale, S.;
Vlcek, B.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vrinceanu, D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Wan, Y.;
Wang, J.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wibowo, S.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Worden, J.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yum, H.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, F.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2014-10-22, last modified: 2014-12-02
Searches for a stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) using
terrestrial detectors typically involve cross-correlating data from pairs of
detectors. The sensitivity of such cross-correlation analyses depends, among
other things, on the separation between the two detectors: the smaller the
separation, the better the sensitivity. Hence, a co-located detector pair is
more sensitive to a gravitational-wave background than a non-co-located
detector pair. However, co-located detectors are also expected to suffer from
correlated noise from instrumental and environmental effects that could
contaminate the measurement of the background. Hence, methods to identify and
mitigate the effects of correlated noise are necessary to achieve the potential
increase in sensitivity of co-located detectors. Here we report on the first
SGWB analysis using the two LIGO Hanford detectors and address the
complications arising from correlated environmental noise. We apply correlated
noise identification and mitigation techniques to data taken by the two LIGO
Hanford detectors, H1 and H2, during LIGO's fifth science run. At low
frequencies, 40 - 460 Hz, we are unable to sufficiently mitigate the correlated
noise to a level where we may confidently measure or bound the stochastic
gravitational-wave signal. However, at high frequencies, 460-1000 Hz, these
techniques are sufficient to set a $95%$ confidence level (C.L.) upper limit on
the gravitational-wave energy density of \Omega(f)<7.7 x 10^{-4} (f/ 900 Hz)^3,
which improves on the previous upper limit by a factor of $\sim 180$. In doing
so, we demonstrate techniques that will be useful for future searches using
advanced detectors, where correlated noise (e.g., from global magnetic fields)
may affect even widely separated detectors.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.8260 [pdf] - 1216035
Supernova remnant W49B and its environment
Submitted: 2014-07-30, last modified: 2014-08-03
We study Gamma-ray supernova remnant W49B and its environment using recent
radio and infrared data. {\it Spitzer} IRS low resolution data of W49B shows
shocked excitation lines of H$_{2}$ (0,0) S(0)-S(7) from the SNR-molecular
cloud interaction. The H$_2$ gas is composed of two components with temperature
of $\sim$260 K and $\sim$1060 K respectively. Various spectral lines from
atomic and ionic particles are detected towards W49B. We suggest the ionic
phase has an electron density of $\sim$500 cm${}^{-3}$ and a temperature of
$\sim$${10^4}$ K by the spectral line diagnoses. The mid- and far-infrared data
from {\it MSX}, {\it Spitzer} and {\it Herschel} reveals a 151 $\pm$ 20 K hot
dust component with a mass of 7.5 $\pm$ 6.6 $\times$ ${10}^{-4} {\Msol}$ and a
45 $\pm$ 4 K warm dust component with a mass of 6.4 $\pm$ 3.2 ${\Msol}$. The
hot dust is likely from materials swept up by the shock of W49B. The warm dust
may possibly originate from the evaporation of clouds interacting with W49B. We
build the HI absorption spectra of W49B and nearby four {\HII} regions (W49A,
G42.90+0.58, G42.43-0.26 and G43.19-0.53), and study the relation between W49B
and the surrounding molecular clouds by employing the 2.12 $\mu$m infrared and
CO data. We therefore obtain a kinematic distance of $\sim$10 kpc for W49B and
suggest that the remnant is likely associated with the CO cloud at about 40 km
s$^{-1}$.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.1053 [pdf] - 1403039
Methods and results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
gamma-ray bursts using the GEO600, LIGO, and Virgo detectors
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Alemic, A.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Amariutei, D.;
Andersen, M.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Augustus, H.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barbet, M.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belczynski, C.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, Sukanta;
Bosi, L.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Buchman, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burman, R.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castaldi, G.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Celerier, C.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C.;
Colombini, M.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Croce, R. P.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, C.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dickson, J.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Dominguez, E.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edo, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Gräf, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C. J.;
Gushwa, K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, J.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, W.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hart, M.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horrom, T.;
Hoske, D.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Huerta, E.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
Jang, H.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Ji, Y.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Haris, K.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karlen, J.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keiser, G. M.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N. G.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nanda;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, P. J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. Le;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libbrecht, K.;
Libson, A.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lopez, E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Ma, Y.;
Macdonald, E. P.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Maglione, C.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mangini, N. M.;
Mansell, G.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martinelli, L.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McLin, K.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meinders, M.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A. H.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Omar, S.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, R.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ortega, W.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, H.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poteomkin, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Ramirez, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Recchia, S.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Reula, O.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S. B.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sankar, S.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schilling, R.;
Schilman, M.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Singh, R.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Staley, A.;
Stebbins, J.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tao, J.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Tellez, G.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Tshilumba, D.;
Tuennermann, H.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Heijningen, J.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, K.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wolovick, N.;
Worden, J.;
Wu, Y.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, Fan;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S.;
Zweizig, J.;
Cain, J.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Gill, C.;
Jones, G.;
Patel, P.;
Rogstad, S.;
Trias, M.
Submitted: 2014-05-05, last modified: 2014-07-01
In this paper we report on a search for short-duration gravitational wave
bursts in the frequency range 64 Hz-1792 Hz associated with gamma-ray bursts
(GRBs), using data from GEO600 and one of the LIGO or Virgo detectors. We
introduce the method of a linear search grid to analyse GRB events with large
sky localisation uncertainties such as the localisations provided by the Fermi
Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM). Coherent searches for gravitational waves (GWs)
can be computationally intensive when the GRB sky position is not
well-localised, due to the corrections required for the difference in arrival
time between detectors. Using a linear search grid we are able to reduce the
computational cost of the analysis by a factor of O(10) for GBM events.
Furthermore, we demonstrate that our analysis pipeline can improve upon the sky
localisation of GRBs detected by the GBM, if a high-frequency GW signal is
observed in coincidence. We use the linear search grid method in a search for
GWs associated with 129 GRBs observed satellite-based gamma-ray experiments
between 2006 and 2011. The GRBs in our sample had not been previously analysed
for GW counterparts. A fraction of our GRB events are analysed using data from
GEO600 while the detector was using squeezed-light states to improve its
sensitivity; this is the first search for GWs using data from a squeezed-light
interferometric observatory. We find no evidence for GW signals, either with
any individual GRB in this sample or with the population as a whole. For each
GRB we place lower bounds on the distance to the progenitor, assuming a fixed
GW emission energy of $10^{-2} M_{\odot}c^{2}$, with a median exclusion
distance of 0.8 Mpc for emission at 500 Hz and 0.3 Mpc at 1 kHz. The reduced
computational cost associated with a linear search grid will enable rapid
searches for GWs associated with Fermi GBM events in the Advanced detector era.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.6639 [pdf] - 848128
Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts detected
by the InterPlanetary Network
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Alemic, A.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Amariutei, D.;
Andersen, M.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Augustus, H.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barbet, M.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belczynski, C.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, Sukanta;
Bosi, L.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Buchman, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burman, R.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castaldi, G.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Celerier, C.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C.;
Colombini, M.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Croce, R. P.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, C.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dickson, J.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Dominguez, E.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edo, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Gräf, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C. J.;
Gushwa, K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, J.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, W.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hart, M.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horrom, T.;
Hoske, D.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Huerta, E.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
Jang, H.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Ji, Y.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karlen, J.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keiser, G. M.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N. G.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nanda;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, P. J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. Le;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libbrecht, K.;
Libson, A.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lopez, E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Ma, Y.;
Macdonald, E. P.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Maglione, C.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mangini, N. M.;
Mansell, G.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martinelli, L.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McLin, K.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meinders, M.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A. H.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Omar, S.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, R.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ortega, W.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, H.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poteomkin, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Ramirez, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Recchia, S.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Reula, O.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S. B.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sankar, S.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schilling, R.;
Schilman, M.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Singh, R.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Staley, A.;
Stebbins, J.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tao, J.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Tellez, G.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Tshilumba, D.;
Tuennermann, H.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Heijningen, J.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, K.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wolovick, N.;
Worden, J.;
Wu, Y.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, Fan;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Atteia, J. L.;
Cline, T.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Palmer, D.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Terada, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2014-03-26, last modified: 2014-04-17
We present the results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
223 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the InterPlanetary Network (IPN) in
2005-2010 during LIGO's fifth and sixth science runs and Virgo's first, second
and third science runs. The IPN satellites provide accurate times of the bursts
and sky localizations that vary significantly from degree scale to hundreds of
square degrees. We search for both a well-modeled binary coalescence signal,
the favored progenitor model for short GRBs, and for generic, unmodeled
gravitational wave bursts. Both searches use the event time and sky
localization to improve the gravitational-wave search sensitivity as compared
to corresponding all-time, all-sky searches. We find no evidence of a
gravitational-wave signal associated with any of the IPN GRBs in the sample,
nor do we find evidence for a population of weak gravitational-wave signals
associated with the GRBs. For all IPN-detected GRBs, for which a sufficient
duration of quality gravitational-wave data is available, we place lower bounds
on the distance to the source in accordance with an optimistic assumption of
gravitational-wave emission energy of $10^{-2}M_{\odot}c^2$ at 150 Hz, and find
a median of 13 Mpc. For the 27 short-hard GRBs we place 90% confidence
exclusion distances to two source models: a binary neutron star coalescence,
with a median distance of 12Mpc, or the coalescence of a neutron star and black
hole, with a median distance of 22 Mpc. Finally, we combine this search with
previously published results to provide a population statement for GRB searches
in first-generation LIGO and Virgo gravitational-wave detectors, and a
resulting examination of prospects for the advanced gravitational-wave
detectors.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.7878 [pdf] - 1173056
Kinematic distance study of the planetary nebulae-supernova remnant-HII
region complex at G35.6-0.5
Submitted: 2013-07-30
Two possible planetary nebulae (PN G035.5-00.4 and IRAS 18551+0159), one
newly re-identified supernova remnant (SNR G35.6-0.4), and one HII region
(G35.6-0.5) form a line-of-sight-overlapped complex known as G35.6-0.5. We
analyze 21 cm HI absorption spectra towards the complex to constrain their
kinematic distances. PN G035.5-00.4 has a distance from 3.8+/-0.4 kpc to
5.4+/-0.7 kpc. IRAS 18551+0159 is at 4.3+/-0.5 kpc. We discuss the distance for
SNR 35.6-0.4, for which the previous estimate was 10.5 kpc, and find plausible
for it to be 3.6+/-0.4 kpc. The new distance of SNR G35.6-0.4 and the derived
mass for the ~55 km/s CO molecular cloud can accommodate an association with
HESS J1858+020. We also conclude that SNR G35.6-0.4 is unlikely associated with
PSR J1857+0210 or PSR J1857+0212, which are projected into the SNR area.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.6509 [pdf] - 685885
78 Pairs of Possible PSR-SNR Associations
Submitted: 2013-06-27
We discuss the criteria to associate PSRs with SNRs, and summary 78 pairs of
possible PSR-SNR associations which is the most complete sample so far. We
refine them into three categories according to degree of reliability. Statistic
study on PSR-SNR associations helps us understand massive star evolution and
constrain pulsar's theory models.
