The epoch of reionization (EoR) marks the end of the Cosmic Dawn and the beginning of large-scale structure formation in the universe. The impulsive ionization fronts (I-fronts) heat and ionize the gas within the reionization bubbles in the intergalactic medium (IGM). The temperature during this process is a key yet uncertain ingredient in current models. Typically, reionization simulations assume that all baryonic species are in instantaneous thermal equilibrium with each other during the passage of an I-front. Here we present a new model of the temperature evolution for the ionization front by studying non-equilibrium effects. In particular, we include the energy transfer between major baryon species ($e^{-}$, \HI, \HII, \HeI, and \HeII) and investigate their impacts on the post-ionization front temperature $T_{\mathrm{re}}$. For a better step-size control when solving the stiff equations, we implement an implicit method and construct an energy transfer rate matrix. We find that the assumption of equilibration is valid for a low-speed ionization front ($\lessapprox\ 10^9~\mathrm{cm}/\mathrm{s}$), but deviations from equilibrium occur for faster fronts. The post-front temperature $T_{\mathrm{re}}$ is lower by up to 19.7\% (at $3\times 10^9$ cm/s) or 30.8\% (at $10^{10}$ cm/s) relative to the equilibrium case.

Different inflationary models predict oscillatory features in the primordial power spectrum. These can leave an imprint on both the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and the large-scale structure (LSS) of our Universe, that can be searched for with current data. Inspired by the axion-monodromy model of inflation, we search for primordial oscillations that are logarithmic in wavenumber, using both CMB data from the Planck satellite and LSS data from the WiggleZ galaxy survey. We find that, within our search range for the new oscillation parameters (amplitude, frequency and phase), both CMB-only and CMB+LSS data yield the same best-fit oscillation frequency of $\log_{10}\omega=1.5$, improving the fit over $\Lambda$CDM by $\Delta\chi^2\! =\! -9$ and $\Delta\chi^2\! =\! -13$ (roughly corresponding to $2\sigma$ and $2.8\sigma$ significance), respectively. Bayesian evidence for the log-oscillation model versus $\Lambda$CDM indicates a very slight preference for the latter. Future CMB and LSS data will further probe this scenario.