Normalized to: Zaprudin, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.01751 [pdf] - 1799916
Long-term optical monitoring of TeV emitting Blazars
Nilsson, K.;
Lindfors, E.;
Takalo, L. O.;
Reinthal, R.;
Berdyugin, A.;
Ciprini, A. Sillanpää S.;
Halkola, A.;
Heinämäki, P.;
Hovatta, T.;
Kadenius, V.;
Nurmi, P.;
Ostorero, L.;
Pasanen, M.;
Rekola, R.;
Saarinen, J.;
Sainio, J.;
Tuominen, T.;
Villforth, C.;
Vornanen, T.;
Zaprudin, B.
Submitted: 2018-10-01
We present 10 years of R-band monitoring data of 31 northern blazars which
were either detected at very high energy (VHE) gamma rays or listed as
potential VHE gamma-ray emitters. The data comprise 11820 photometric data
points in the R-band obtained in 2002-2012. We analyze the light curves by
determining their power spectral density (PSD) slopes assuming a power-law
dependence with a single slope $\beta$ and a Gaussian probability density
function (PDF). We use the multiple fragments variance function (MFVF) combined
with a forward-casting approach and likelihood analysis to determine the slopes
and perform extensive simulations to estimate the uncertainties of the derived
slopes. We also look for periodic variations via Fourier analysis and quantify
the false alarm probability through a large number of simulations. Comparing
the obtained PSD slopes to values in the literature, we find the slopes in the
radio band to be steeper than those in the optical and gamma rays. Our
periodicity search yielded one target, Mrk 421, with a significant (p<5%)
period. Finding one significant period among 31 targets is consistent with the
expected false alarm rate, but the period found in Mrk~421 is very strong and
deserves further consideration}.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.10235 [pdf] - 1590381
Evidence of sub-surface energy storage in comet 67P from the outburst of
2016 July 3
Agarwal, J.;
Della Corte, V.;
Feldman, P. D.;
Geiger, B.;
Merouane, S.;
Bertini, I.;
Bodewits, D.;
Fornasier, S.;
Gruen, E.;
Hasselmann, P.;
Hilchenbach, M.;
Hoefner, S.;
Ivanovski, S.;
Kolokolova, L.;
Pajola, M.;
Rotundi, A.;
Sierks, H.;
Steffl, A. J.;
Thomas, N.;
A'Hearn, M. F.;
Barbieri, C.;
Barucci, M. A.;
Bertaux, J. -L.;
Boudreault, S.;
Cremonese, G.;
Da Deppo, V.;
Davidsson, B.;
Debei, S.;
De Cecco, M.;
Deller, J. F.;
Feaga, L. M.;
Fischer, H.;
Fulle, M.;
Gicquel, A.;
Groussin, O.;
Guettler, C.;
Gutierrez, P. J.;
Hofmann, M.;
Hornung, K.;
Hviid, S. F.;
Ip, W. -H.;
Jorda, L.;
Keller, H. U.;
Kissel, J.;
Knollenberg, J.;
Koch, A.;
Koschny, D.;
Kramm, J. -R.;
Kuehrt, E.;
Kueppers, M.;
Lamy, P. L.;
Langevin, Y.;
Lara, L. M.;
Lazzarin, M.;
Lin, Z. -Y.;
Moreno, J. J. Lopez;
Lowry, S. C.;
Marzari, F.;
Mottola, S.;
Naletto, G.;
Oklay, N.;
Parker, J. Wm.;
Rodrigo, R.;
Rynoe, J.;
Shi, X.;
Stenzel, O.;
Tubiana, C.;
Vincent, J. -B.;
Weaver, H. A.;
Zaprudin, B.
Submitted: 2017-10-27
On 3 July 2016, several instruments on board ESA's Rosetta spacecraft
detected signs of an outburst event on comet 67P, at a heliocentric distance of
3.32 AU from the sun, outbound from perihelion. We here report on the inferred
properties of the ejected dust and the surface change at the site of the
outburst. The activity coincided with the local sunrise and continued over a
time interval of 14 - 68 minutes. It left a 10m-sized icy patch on the surface.
The ejected material comprised refractory grains of several hundred microns in
size, and sub-micron-sized water ice grains. The high dust mass production rate
is incompatible with the free sublimation of crystalline water ice under solar
illumination as the only acceleration process. Additional energy stored near
the surface must have increased the gas density. We suggest a pressurized
sub-surface gas reservoir, or the crystallization of amorphous water ice as
possible causes.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.10539 [pdf] - 1584026
The 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko observation campaign in support of the
Rosetta mission
Snodgrass, C.;
A'Hearn, M. F.;
Aceituno, F.;
Afanasiev, V.;
Bagnulo, S.;
Bauer, J.;
Bergond, G.;
Besse, S.;
Biver, N.;
Bodewits, D.;
Boehnhardt, H.;
Bonev, B. P.;
Borisov, G.;
Carry, B.;
Casanova, V.;
Cochran, A.;
Conn, B. C.;
Davidsson, B.;
Davies, J. K.;
de León, J.;
de Mooij, E.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Delacruz, M.;
DiSanti, M. A.;
Drew, J. E.;
Duffard, R.;
Edberg, N. J. T.;
Faggi, S.;
Feaga, L.;
Fitzsimmons, A.;
Fujiwara, H.;
Gibb, E. L.;
Gillon, M.;
Green, S. F.;
Guijarro, A.;
Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.;
Gutiérrez, P. J.;
Hadamcik, E.;
Hainaut, O.;
Haque, S.;
Hedrosa, R.;
Hines, D.;
Hopp, U.;
Hoyo, F.;
Hutsemékers, D.;
Hyland, M.;
Ivanova, O.;
Jehin, E.;
Jones, G. H.;
Keane, J. V.;
Kelley, M. S. P.;
Kiselev, N.;
Kleyna, J.;
Kluge, M.;
Knight, M. M.;
Kokotanekova, R.;
Koschny, D.;
Kramer, E.;
López-Moreno, J. J.;
Lacerda, P.;
Lara, L. M.;
Lasue, J.;
Lehto, H. J.;
Levasseur-Regourd, A. C.;
Licandro, J.;
Lin, Z. Y.;
Lister, T.;
Lowry, S. C.;
Mainzer, A.;
Manfroid, J.;
Marchant, J.;
McKay, A. J.;
McNeill, A.;
Meech, K. J.;
Micheli, M.;
Mohammed, I.;
Monguió, M.;
Moreno, F.;
Muñoz, O.;
Mumma, M. J.;
Nikolov, P.;
Opitom, C.;
Ortiz, J. L.;
Paganini, L.;
Pajuelo, M.;
Pozuelos, F. J.;
Protopapa, S.;
Pursimo, T.;
Rajkumar, B.;
Ramanjooloo, Y.;
Ramos, E.;
Ries, C.;
Riffeser, A.;
Rosenbush, V.;
Rousselot, P.;
Ryan, E. L.;
Santos-Sanz, P.;
Schleicher, D. G.;
Schmidt, M.;
Schulz, R.;
Sen, A. K.;
Somero, A.;
Sota, A.;
Stinson, A.;
Sunshine, J.;
Thompson, A.;
Tozzi, G. P.;
Tubiana, C.;
Villanueva, G. L.;
Wang, X.;
Wooden, D. H.;
Yagi, M.;
Yang, B.;
Zaprudin, B.;
Zegmott, T. J.
Submitted: 2017-05-30
We present a summary of the campaign of remote observations that supported
the European Space Agency's Rosetta mission. Telescopes across the globe (and
in space) followed comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from before Rosetta's
arrival until nearly the end of mission in September 2016. These provided
essential data for mission planning, large-scale context information for the
coma and tails beyond the spacecraft, and a way to directly compare 67P with
other comets. The observations revealed 67P to be a relatively `well behaved'
comet, typical of Jupiter family comets and with activity patterns that repeat
from orbit-to-orbit. Comparison between this large collection of telescopic
observations and the in situ results from Rosetta will allow us to better
understand comet coma chemistry and structure. This work is just beginning as
the mission ends -- in this paper we present a summary of the ground-based
observations and early results, and point to many questions that will be
addressed in future studies.