Normalized to: Zaire, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.13285 [pdf] - 2006783
Dipolar stability in spherical simulations: the impact of an inner
stable zone
Submitted: 2019-11-29
Magnetic fields vary in complexity for different stars. The stability of
dipolar magnetic fields is known to depend on different quantities, e.g., the
stellar rotation, the stratification, and the intensity of convective motions.
Here, we study the dipolar stability in a system with an inner stable zone. We
present preliminary results of dynamo simulations using the Rayleigh number as
a control parameter. The stiffness of the stable zone is accordingly varied to
keep a constant ratio of the Brunt-Vaisala frequency to the angular velocity.
Similarly to the completely convective spherical shell, we find that a
transition exists between a regime where the magnetic field is dipolar to a
multipolar regime when the Rossby number is increased. The value of the Rossby
number at the transition is very close to the one of the fully convective case.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.07978 [pdf] - 1920796
What sets the magnetic field strength and cycle period in solar-type
stars?
Submitted: 2018-10-18, last modified: 2019-05-13
Two fundamental properties of stellar magnetic fields have been determined by
observations for solar-like stars with different Rossby numbers (Ro), namely,
the magnetic field strength and the magnetic cycle period. The field strength
exhibits two regimes: 1) for fast rotation it is independent of Ro, 2) for slow
rotation it decays with Ro following a power law. For the magnetic cycle period
two regimes of activity, the active and inactive branches, also have been
identified. For both of them, the longer the rotation period, the longer the
activity cycle. Using global dynamo simulations of solar like stars with Rossby
numbers between ~0.4 and ~2, this paper explores the relevance of rotational
shear layers in determining these observational properties. Our results,
consistent with non-linear alpha^2-Omega dynamos, show that the total magnetic
field strength is independent of the rotation period. Yet at surface levels,
the origin of the magnetic field is determined by Ro. While for Ro<1 it is
generated in the convection zone, for Ro>1 strong toroidal fields are generated
at the tachocline and rapidly emerge towards the surface. In agreement with the
observations, the magnetic cycle period increases with the rotational period.
However, a bifurcation is observed for Ro~1, separating a regime where
oscillatory dynamos operate mainly in the convection zone, from the regime
where the tachocline has a predominant role. In the latter the cycles are
believed to result from the periodic energy exchange between the dynamo and the
magneto-shear instabilities developing in the tachocline and the radiative
interior.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02057 [pdf] - 1590822
Magnetic field generation in PMS stars with and without radiative core
Submitted: 2017-11-06
Recent observations of the magnetic field in pre-main sequence stars suggest
that the magnetic field topology changes as a function of age. The presence of
a tachocline could be an important factor in the development of magnetic field
with higher multipolar modes. In this work we performed MHD simulations using
the EULAG-MHD code to study the magnetic field generation and evolution in
models that mimic stars at two evolutionary stages. The stratification for both
stellar phases was computed by fitting stellar structure profiles obtained with
the ATON stellar evolution code. The first stage is at $1.1 \mathrm{Myr}$, when
the star is completely convective. The second stage is at $14 \mathrm{Myrs}$,
when the star is partly convective, with a radiative core developed up to
$30\%$ of the stellar radius. In this proceedings we present a preliminary
analysis of the resulting mean-flows and magnetic field. The mean-flow analysis
shown that the star rotate almost rigidly on the fully convective phase,
whereas at the partially convective phase there is differential rotation with
conical contours of iso-rotation. As for the mean magnetic field both
simulations show similarities with respect to the field evolution. However, the
topology of the magnetic field is different.