Normalized to: Younger, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.07527 [pdf] - 1392956
Experience with wavefront sensor and deformable mirror interfaces for
wide-field adaptive optics systems
Basden, A. G.;
Atkinson, D.;
Bharmal, N. A.;
Bitenc, U.;
Brangier, M.;
Buey, T.;
Butterley, T.;
Cano, D.;
Chemla, F.;
Clark, P.;
Cohen, M.;
Conan, J. -M.;
de Cos, F. J.;
Dickson, C.;
Dipper, N. A.;
Dunlop, C. N.;
Feautrier, P.;
Fusco, T.;
Gach, J. L.;
Gendron, E.;
Geng, D.;
Goodsell, S. J.;
Gratadour, D.;
Greenaway, A. H.;
Guesalaga, A.;
Guzman, C. D.;
Henry, D.;
Holck, D.;
Hubert, Z.;
Huet, J. M.;
Kellerer, A.;
Kulcsar, C.;
Laporte, P.;
Roux, B. Le;
Looker, N.;
Longmore, A. J.;
Marteaud, M.;
Martin, O.;
Meimon, S.;
Morel, C.;
Morris, T. J.;
Myers, R. M.;
Osborn, J.;
Perret, D.;
Petit, C.;
Raynaud, H.;
Reeves, A. P.;
Rousset, G.;
Lasheras, F. Sanchez;
Rodriguez, M. Sanchez;
Santos, J. D.;
Sevin, A.;
Sivo, G.;
Stadler, E.;
Stobie, B.;
Talbot, G.;
Todd, S.;
Vidal, F.;
Younger, E. J.
Submitted: 2016-03-24
Recent advances in adaptive optics (AO) have led to the implementation of
wide field-of-view AO systems. A number of wide-field AO systems are also
planned for the forthcoming Extremely Large Telescopes. Such systems have
multiple wavefront sensors of different types, and usually multiple deformable
mirrors (DMs).
Here, we report on our experience integrating cameras and DMs with the
real-time control systems of two wide-field AO systems. These are CANARY, which
has been operating on-sky since 2010, and DRAGON, which is a laboratory
adaptive optics real-time demonstrator instrument. We detail the issues and
difficulties that arose, along with the solutions we developed. We also provide
recommendations for consideration when developing future wide-field AO systems.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.6008 [pdf] - 841191
Analysis of on-sky MOAO performance of CANARY using natural guide stars
Vidal, Fabrice;
Gendron, Eric;
Rousset, Gerard;
Morris, Tim;
Basden, Alastair;
Myers, Richard;
Brangier, Matthieu;
Chemla, Fanny;
Dipper, Nigel;
Gratadour, Damien;
Henry, David;
Hubert, Zoltan;
Longmore, Andy;
Martin, Olivier;
Talbot, Gordon;
Younger, Eddy
Submitted: 2014-06-23
The first on-sky results obtained by CANARY, the Multi-Object Adaptive Optics
(MOAO) demonstrator, are analysed. The data were recorded at the William
Herschel Telescope, at the end of September 2010. We describe the command and
calibrations algorithms used during the run and present the observing
conditions. The processed data are MOAO-loop engaged or disengaged slope
buffers, comprising the synchronised measurements of the four Natural Guide
Stars (NGS) wavefront sensors running in parallel, and near Infra-Red (IR)
images. We describe the method we use to establish the error budget of CANARY.
We are able to evaluate the to- mographic and the open loop errors, having
median values around 216 nm and 110 nm respectively. In addition, we identify
an unexpected residual quasi-static field aberration term of mean value 110 nm.
We present the detailed error budget analysed for three sets of data for three
different asterisms. We compare the experimental budgets with the numerically
simulated ones and demonstrate a good agreement. We find also a good agreement
between the computed error budget from the slope buffers and the measured
Strehl ratio on the IR images, ranging between 10% and 20% at 1 530 nm. These
results make us confident in our ability to establish the error budget of
future MOAO instruments.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.3209 [pdf] - 242735
The Durham adaptive optics real-time controller
Submitted: 2010-10-15
The Durham adaptive optics real-time controller was initially a proof of
concept design for a generic adaptive optics control system. It has since been
developed into a modern and powerful CPU based real-time control system,
capable of using hardware acceleration (including FPGAs and GPUs), based
primarily around commercial off the shelf hardware. It is powerful enough to be
used as the real-time controller for all currently planned 8~m class telescope
adaptive optics systems. Here we give details of this controller and the
concepts behind it, and report on performance including latency and jitter,
which is less than 10~$\mu$s for small adaptive optics systems.