Yoldacs, A. Kupcu
Normalized to: Yoldacs, A.
1 article(s) in total. 33 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 26,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.2958 [pdf] - 22458
Rise and fall of the X-ray flash 080330: an off-axis jet?
Guidorzi, C.;
Clemens, C.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Granot, J.;
Melandri, A.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
Klotz, A.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Covino, S.;
Greiner, J.;
Malesani, D.;
Mao, J.;
Mundell, C. G.;
Steele, I. A.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Margutti, R.;
Bersier, D.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
D'Elia, V.;
Fugazza, D.;
Genet, F.;
Gomboc, A.;
Kruehler, T.;
Yoldacs, A. Kupcu;
Moretti, A.;
Mottram, C. J.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Smith, R. J.;
Szokoly, G.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Gehrels, N.
Submitted: 2009-03-17
X-ray flashes (XRFs) are a class of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with the peak
energy of the time-integrated spectrum, Ep, below 30 keV, whereas classical
GRBs have Ep of a few hundreds keV. Apart from Ep and the lower luminosity, the
properties of XRFs are typical of the classical GRBs. Yet, the nature of XRFs
and the differences from that of GRBs are not understood. In addition, there is
no consensus on the interpretation of the shallow decay phase observed in most
X-ray afterglows of both XRFs and GRBs. We examine in detail the case of XRF
080330 discovered by Swift at the redshift of 1.51. This burst is
representative of the XRF class and exhibits an X-ray shallow decay. The rich
and broadband (from NIR to UV) photometric data set we collected across this
phase makes it an ideal candidate to test the off-axis jet interpretation
proposed to explain both the softness of XRFs and the shallow decay phase. We
present prompt gamma-ray, early and late IR/visible/UV and X-ray observations
of the XRF 080330. We derive a SED from NIR to X-ray bands across the plateau
phase with a power-law index of 0.79 +- 0.01 and negligible rest-frame dust
extinction. The multi-wavelength evolution of the afterglow is achromatic from
~10^2 s out to ~8x10^4 s. We describe the temporal evolution of the
multi-wavelength afterglow within the context of the standard afterglow model
and show that a single-component jet viewed off-axis explains the observations
(abriged).