sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Yankelevich, Victoria

Normalized to: Yankelevich, V.

5 article(s) in total. 167 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055  [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Comments: 15 pages, 8 figures
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC) between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration: Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$, whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes. Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273  [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes
Euclid Collaboration; Blanchard, A.; Camera, S.; Carbone, C.; Cardone, V. F.; Casas, S.; Ilić, S.; Kilbinger, M.; Kitching, T.; Kunz, M.; Lacasa, F.; Linder, E.; Majerotto, E.; Markovič, K.; Martinelli, M.; Pettorino, V.; Pourtsidou, A.; Sakr, Z.; Sánchez, A. G.; Sapone, D.; Tutusaus, I.; Yahia-Cherif, S.; Yankelevich, V.; Andreon, S.; Aussel, H.; Balaguera-Antolínez, A.; Baldi, M.; Bardelli, S.; Bender, R.; Biviano, A.; Bonino, D.; Boucaud, A.; Bozzo, E.; Branchini, E.; Brau-Nogue, S.; Brescia, M.; Brinchmann, J.; Burigana, C.; Cabanac, R.; Capobianco, V.; Cappi, A.; Carretero, J.; Carvalho, C. S.; Casas, R.; Castander, F. J.; Castellano, M.; Cavuoti, S.; Cimatti, A.; Cledassou, R.; Colodro-Conde, C.; Congedo, G.; Conselice, C. J.; Conversi, L.; Copin, Y.; Corcione, L.; Coupon, J.; Courtois, H. M.; Cropper, M.; Da Silva, A.; de la Torre, S.; Di Ferdinando, D.; Dubath, F.; Ducret, F.; Duncan, C. A. J.; Dupac, X.; Dusini, S.; Fabbian, G.; Fabricius, M.; Farrens, S.; Fosalba, P.; Fotopoulou, S.; Fourmanoit, N.; Frailis, M.; Franceschi, E.; Franzetti, P.; Fumana, M.; Galeotta, S.; Gillard, W.; Gillis, B.; Giocoli, C.; Gómez-Alvarez, P.; Graciá-Carpio, J.; Grupp, F.; Guzzo, L.; Hoekstra, H.; Hormuth, F.; Israel, H.; Jahnke, K.; Keihanen, E.; Kermiche, S.; Kirkpatrick, C. C.; Kohley, R.; Kubik, B.; Kurki-Suonio, H.; Ligori, S.; Lilje, P. B.; Lloro, I.; Maino, D.; Maiorano, E.; Marggraf, O.; Martinet, N.; Marulli, F.; Massey, R.; Medinaceli, E.; Mei, S.; Mellier, Y.; Metcalf, B.; Metge, J. J.; Meylan, G.; Moresco, M.; Moscardini, L.; Munari, E.; Nichol, R. C.; Niemi, S.; Nucita, A. A.; Padilla, C.; Paltani, S.; Pasian, F.; Percival, W. J.; Pires, S.; Polenta, G.; Poncet, M.; Pozzetti, L.; Racca, G. D.; Raison, F.; Renzi, A.; Rhodes, J.; Romelli, E.; Roncarelli, M.; Rossetti, E.; Saglia, R.; Schneider, P.; Scottez, V.; Secroun, A.; Sirri, G.; Stanco, L.; Starck, J. -L.; Sureau, F.; Tallada-Crespí, P.; Tavagnacco, D.; Taylor, A. N.; Tenti, M.; Tereno, I.; Toledo-Moreo, R.; Torradeflot, F.; Valenziano, L.; Vassallo, T.; Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes; Viel, M.; Wang, Y.; Zacchei, A.; Zoubian, J.; Zucca, E.
Comments: 75 pages, 13 figures, 18 tables. Acknowledgements include Authors' contributions. Abstract abridged
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations, reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at least a factor of three.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1807.07076  [pdf] - 1794086
Cosmological information in the redshift-space bispectrum
Comments: 24 pages, 15 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS. Minor changes to match the published version. Includes updated HOD model for Euclid galaxies. Conclusions unchanged
Submitted: 2018-07-18, last modified: 2018-12-07
We use the Fisher-matrix formalism to investigate whether the galaxy bispectrum in redshift space, $B$, contains additional cosmological information with respect to the power spectrum, $P$. We focus on a $Euclid$-like survey and consider cosmological models dominated by dark energy and cold dark matter with Gaussian primordial perturbations. After discussing the phenomenology of redshift-space distortions for the bispectrum, we derive an expression for the cross-covariance between $B$ and $P$ at leading order in perturbation theory. Our equation generalizes previous results that did not consider binning in the orientation of wavevector triangles with respect to the line of sight. By considering Fourier modes with wavenumber $k<0.15 \,h$ Mpc$^{-1}$, we find that $B$ and $P$ set similar constraints on the cosmological parameters. Generally, error bars moderately improve when the two probes are combined together. For instance, the joint 68.3 per cent credible region for the parameters that describe a dynamical dark-energy equation of state shrinks by a factor of 2.6 with respect to only using the power spectrum. Regrettably, this improvement is cancelled out when the clustering analysis is combined with priors based on current studies of the cosmic microwave background. In this case, combining $B$ and $P$ does not give any appreciable benefit other than allowing a precise determination of galaxy bias. Finally, we discuss how results depend on the binning strategy for the clustering statistics as well as on the maximum wavenumber. We also show that only considering the bispectrum monopole leads to a significant loss of information.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1503.04650  [pdf] - 1707630
Towards accurate rescaling of a halo mass function
Comments: 7 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in Open Astronomy
Submitted: 2015-03-16, last modified: 2018-06-29
We investigate the precision within which a simulated dark matter halo mass function can be rescaled to a different set of cosmological parameters. Our tests show that the accuracy almost linearly depends on the difference of the cosmological parameters and amounts to few percent in the case of WMAP5 and PLANCK parameters. The rescaling allows thus to obtain a mass function with better precision than the one given by Sheth-Mo-Tormen approximation and even more modern fits currently used in literature.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1401.3704  [pdf] - 956953
Notes on counter-orbiting globular clusters in the Milky Way
Comments: 9 pages, 6 figures
Submitted: 2014-01-15, last modified: 2014-07-07
It is argued that Galactic globular clusters rotating retrograde may originate from prograde globular clusters that change their angular momenturm due to gravitational perturbations from the Magellanic Cloud galaxies. It is shown that those galactic globular clusters with orbits near the Lagrangiane point of the system "Milky Way - Maggellanic Clouds" can change the sign of their angular momentum in few Gyr time scale.