Normalized to: Yadav, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.13996 [pdf] - 2097435
Simulations Show that Vortex Flows could Heat the Chromosphere in Solar
Plage
Submitted: 2020-04-29
The relationship between vortex flows at different spatial scales and their
contribution to the energy balance in the chromosphere is not yet fully
understood. We perform three-dimensional (3D) radiation-magnetohydrodynamic
(MHD) simulations of a unipolar solar plage region at a spatial resolution of
10 km using the MURaM code. We use the swirling-strength criterion that mainly
detects the smallest vortices present in the simulation data. We additionally
degrade our simulation data to smooth-out the smaller vortices, so that also
the vortices at larger spatial scales can be detected. Vortex flows at various
spatial scales are found in our simulation data for different effective spatial
resolutions. We conclude that the observed large vortices are likely clusters
of much smaller ones that are not yet resolved by observations. We show that
the vertical Poynting flux decreases rapidly with reduced effective spatial
resolutions and is predominantly carried by the horizontal plasma motions
rather than vertical flows. Since the small-scale horizontal motions or the
smaller vortices carry most of the energy, the energy transported by vortices
deduced from low resolution data is grossly underestimated. In full resolution
simulation data, the Poynting flux contribution due to vortices is more than
adequate to compensate for the radiative losses in plage, indicating their
importance for chromospheric heating.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.04378 [pdf] - 2053989
Large-Scale Mixing in a Violent Oxygen-Neon Shell Merger Prior to a
Core-Collapse Supernova
Submitted: 2019-05-10, last modified: 2019-12-06
We present a seven-minute long $4\pi$-3D simulation of a shell merger event
in a non-rotating $18.88\, M_\odot$ supernova progenitor before the onset of
gravitational collapse. The key motivation is to capture the large-scale mixing
and asymmetries in the wake of the shell merger before collapse using a
self-consistent approach. The $4\pi$ geometry is crucial as it allows us to
follow the growth and evolution of convective modes on the largest possible
scales. We find significant differences between the kinematic, thermodynamic
and chemical evolution of the 3D and the 1D model. The 3D model shows vigorous
convection leading to more efficient mixing of nuclear species. In the 3D case
the entire oxygen shell attains convective Mach numbers of $\mathord{\approx}\,
0.1$, whereas in the 1D model, the convective velocities are much lower and
there is negligible overshooting across convective boundaries. In the 3D case,
the convective eddies entrain nuclear species from the neon (and carbon) layers
into the deeper part of the oxygen burning shell, where they burn and power a
violent convection phase with outflows. This is a prototypical model of a
convective-reactive system. Due to the strong convection and the resulting
efficient mixing, the interface between the neon layer and the silicon-enriched
oxygen layer disappears during the evolution, and silicon is mixed far out into
merged oxygen/neon shell. Neon entrained inwards by convective downdrafts
burns, resulting in lower neon mass in the 3D model compared to the 1D model at
time of collapse. In addition, the 3D model develops remarkable large-scale,
large-amplitude asymmetries, which may have important implications for the
impending gravitational collapse and the subsequent explosion.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.12975 [pdf] - 1911830
Observation of seasonal variation of atmospheric multiple-muon events in
the NOvA Near Detector
Acero, M. A.;
Adamson, P.;
Aliaga, L.;
Alion, T.;
Allakhverdian, V.;
Altakarli, S.;
Anmov, N.;
Antoshkin, A.;
Aurisano, A.;
Back, A.;
Backhouse, C.;
Baird, M.;
Balashov, N.;
Baldi, P.;
Bambah, B. A.;
Bashar, S.;
Bays, K.;
Bending, S.;
Bernstein, R.;
Bhatnagar, V.;
Bhuyan, B.;
Bian, J.;
Blair, J.;
Booth, A. C.;
Bour, P.;
Bromberg, C.;
Buchanan, N.;
Butkevich, A.;
Calvez, S.;
Campbell, M.;
Carroll, T. J.;
Catano-Mur, E.;
Cedeno, A.;
Childress, S.;
Choudhary, B. C.;
Chowdhury, B.;
Coan, T. E.;
Colo, M.;
Corwin, L.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Davies, G. S.;
Derwent, P. F.;
Ding, P.;
Djurcic, Z.;
Doyle, D.;
Dukes, E. C.;
Duyang, H.;
Edayath, S.;
Ehrlich, R.;
Feldman, G. J.;
Filip, P.;
Flanagan, W.;
Frank, M. J.;
Gallagher, H. R.;
Gandrajula, R.;
Gao, F.;
Germani, S.;
Giri, A.;
Gomes, R. A.;
Goodman, M. C.;
Grichine, V.;
Groh, M.;
Group, R.;
Guo, B.;
Habig, A.;
Hakl, F.;
Hartnell, J.;
Hatcher, R.;
Hatzikoutelis, A.;
Heller, K.;
Hewes, J.;
Himmel, A.;
Holin, A.;
Howard, B.;
Huang, J.;
Hylen, J.;
Jediny, F.;
Johnson, C.;
Judah, M.;
Kakorin, I.;
Kalra, D.;
Kaplan, D. M.;
Keloth, R.;
Klimov, O.;
Koerner, L. W.;
Kolupaeva, L.;
Kotelnikov, S.;
Kreymer, A.;
Kulenberg, Ch.;
Kumar, A.;
Kuruppu, C. D.;
Kus, V.;
Lackey, T.;
Lang, K.;
Lin, S.;
Lokajicek, M.;
Lozier, J.;
Luchuk, S.;
Magill, S.;
Mann, W. A.;
Marshak, M. L.;
Matveev, V.;
Mendez, D. P.;
Messier, M. D.;
Meyer, H.;
Miao, T.;
Miller, W. H.;
Mishra, S. R.;
Mislivec, A.;
Mohanta, R.;
Moren, A.;
Mualem, L.;
Muether, M.;
Mufson, S.;
Mulder, K.;
Murphy, R.;
Musser, J.;
Naples, D.;
Nayak, N.;
Nelson, J. K.;
Nichol, R.;
Nikseresht, G.;
Niner, E.;
Norman, A.;
Nosek, T.;
Olshevskiy, A.;
Olson, T.;
Paley, J.;
Patterson, R. B.;
Pawloski, G.;
Petrova, O.;
Petti, R.;
Phan, D. D.;
Plunkett, R. K.;
Potukuchi, B.;
Principato, C.;
Psihas, F.;
Raj, V.;
Rameika, R. A.;
Rebel, B.;
Rojas, P.;
Ryabov, V.;
Samoylov, O.;
Sanchez, M. C.;
Schreiner, P.;
Seong, I. S.;
Shanahan, P.;
Sheshukov, A.;
Singh, P.;
Singh, V.;
Smith, E.;
Smolik, J.;
Snopok, P.;
Solomey, N.;
Song, E.;
Sousa, A.;
Soustruznik, K.;
Strait, M.;
Suter, L.;
Sutton, A.;
Talaga, R. L.;
Tas, P.;
Thayyullathil, R. B.;
Thomas, J.;
Tiras, E.;
Tognini, S. C.;
Torbunov, D.;
Tripathi, J.;
Tsaris, A.;
Torun, Y.;
Urheim, J.;
Vahle, P.;
Vasel, J.;
Vinton, L.;
Vokac, P.;
Vrba, T.;
Wallbank, M.;
Wang, B.;
Warburton, T. K.;
Wetstein, M.;
While, M.;
Whittington, D.;
Wojcicki, S. G.;
Wolcott, J.;
Yadav, N.;
Dombara, A. Yallappa;
Yonehara, K.;
Yu, S.;
Zadorozhnyy, S.;
Zalesak, J.;
Zwaska, R.
Submitted: 2019-04-29, last modified: 2019-07-08
Using two years of data from the NOvA Near Detector at Fermilab, we report a
seasonal variation of cosmic ray induced multiple-muon event rates which has an
opposite phase to the seasonal variation in the atmospheric temperature. The
strength of the seasonal multipl$ increase as a function of the muon
multiplicity. However, no significant dependence of the strength of the
seasonal variation of the multiple-muon variation is seen as a function of the
muon zenith angle, or the spatial or angular separation between the correlated
muons.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.00815 [pdf] - 1579843
How multiple supernovae overlap to form superbubbles
Submitted: 2016-03-02, last modified: 2017-06-20
We explore the formation of superbubbles through energy deposition by
multiple supernovae (SNe) in a uniform medium. We use total energy conserving,
3-D hydrodynamic simulations to study how SNe correlated in space and time
create superbubbles. While isolated SNe fizzle out completely by $\sim 1$ Myr
due to radiative losses, for a realistic cluster size it is likely that
subsequent SNe go off within the hot/dilute bubble and sustain the shock till
the cluster lifetime. For realistic cluster sizes, we find that the bubble
remains overpressured only if, for a given $n_{g0}$, $N_{\rm OB}$ is
sufficiently large. While most of the input energy is still lost radiatively,
superbubbles can retain up to $\sim 5-10\%$ of the input energy in form of
kinetic+thermal energy till 10 Myr for ISM density $n_{g0} \approx 1$
cm$^{-3}$. We find that the mechanical efficiency decreases for higher
densities ($\eta_{\rm mech} \propto n_{g0}^{-2/3}$). We compare the radii and
velocities of simulated supershells with observations and the classical
adiabatic model. Our simulations show that the superbubbles retain only
$\lesssim 10\%$ of the injected energy, thereby explaining the observed smaller
size and slower expansion of supershells. We also confirm that a sufficiently
large ($\gtrsim 10^4$) number of SNe is required to go off in order to create a
steady wind with a stable termination shock within the superbubble. We show
that the mechanical efficiency increases with increasing resolution, and that
explicit diffusion is required to obtain converged results.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.00824 [pdf] - 1379020
Low frequency radio observations of SN 2011dh and the evolution of its
post-shock plasma properties
Submitted: 2016-03-02
We present late time, low frequency observations of SN 2011dh made using the
Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT). Our observations at $325\ \rm MHz$,
$610\ \rm MHz$ and $1280\ \rm MHz$ conducted between $93-421\ \rm days$ after
the explosion supplement the millimeter and centimeter wave observations
conducted between $4-15 \ \rm days$ after explosion using the Combined Array
for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA) and extensive radio
observations ($ 1.0-36.5\ \rm GHz$) conducted between $16-93\ \rm days$ after
explosion using Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA). We fit a synchrotron self
absorption model (SSA) to the $610\ \rm MHz$ and $1280\ \rm MHz$ radio light
curves. We use it to determine the radius ($R_{\rm p}$) and magnetic field
($B_{\rm p}$) at $173$ \& $323$ days after the explosion. A comparison of the
peak radio luminosity $L_{\rm op}$, with the product of the peak frequency
$\nu_{\rm p}$ and time to peak $t_{\rm p}$ shows that the supernova evolves
between the epochs of CARMA, JVLA and GMRT observations. It shows a general
slowing down of the expansion speed of the radio emitting region on a timescale
of several hundred days during which the shock is propagating through a
circumstellar medium set up by a wind with a constant mass loss parameter,
$\dot M/v_{\rm w}$. We derive the mass loss parameter ($A_{\star}$) based on
$610\ \rm MHz$ and $1280\ \rm MHz$ radio light curves, which are found to be
consistent with each other within error limits.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.3568 [pdf] - 1180729
Electron Cooling in a Young Radio Supernova: SN 2012aw
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Stockdale, Christopher;
Chandra, Poonam;
Smith, Randall;
Roy, Rupak;
Bose, Subhash;
Dwarkadas, Vikram;
Sutaria, Firoza;
Pooley, David
Submitted: 2013-11-14, last modified: 2014-01-08
We present the radio observations and modeling of an optically bright Type
II-P supernova (SN), SN 2012aw which exploded in the nearby galaxy Messier 95
(M95) at a distance of $10\ \rm Mpc$. The spectral index values calculated
using $C$, $X$ & $K$ bands are smaller than the expected values for optically
thin regime. During this time the optical bolometric light curve stays in the
plateau phase. We interpret the low spectral index values to be a result of
electron cooling. On the basis of comparison between Compton cooling timescale
and Synchrotron cooling timescale we find that inverse Compton cooling process
dominates over synchrotron cooling process. We therefore model the radio
emission as synchrotron emission from a relativistic electron population with a
high energy cutoff. The cutoff is determined by comparing the electron cooling
time scale $t_{cool}$ and the acceleration time scale $\tilde t_{acc}$. We
constrain the mass loss rate in the wind ($\dot M\sim 1.9\times10^{-6}\ \rm
M_{\odot}yr^{-1}$) and the equipartition factor between relativistic electrons
and the magnetic field ($\tilde \alpha=\epsilon_e/\epsilon_B\sim
1.12\times10^2$) through our modeling of radio emission. Although the time of
explosion is fairly well constrained by optical observations within about $2\
\rm days$, we explore the effect of varying the time of explosion to best fit
the radio light curves. The best fit is obtained for the explosion date as 2012
March 15.3 UT.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.7067 [pdf] - 1164915
The progenitor of SN 2011ja: Clues from circumstellar interaction
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Ray, Alak;
Smith, Randall;
Ryder, Stuart;
Yadav, Naveen;
Sutaria, Firoza;
Dwarkadas, Vikram V.;
Chandra, Poonam;
Pooley, David;
Roy, Rupak
Submitted: 2013-02-27, last modified: 2013-03-11
Massive stars, possibly red supergiants, which retain extended hydrogen
envelopes until core collapse, produce Type II Plateau (IIP) supernovae. The
ejecta from these explosions shock the circumstellar matter originating from
the mass loss of the progenitor during the final phases of its life. This
interaction accelerates particles to relativistic energies which then lose
energy via synchrotron radiation in the shock-amplified magnetic fields and
inverse Compton scattering against optical photons from the supernova. These
processes produce different signatures in the radio and X-ray part of the
electromagnetic spectrum. Observed together, they allow us to break the
degeneracy between shock acceleration and magnetic field amplification. In this
work we use X-rays observations from the Chandra and radio observations from
the ATCA to study the relative importance of processes which accelerate
particles and those which amplify magnetic fields in producing the non-thermal
radiation from SN 2011ja. We use radio observations to constrain the explosion
date. Multiple Chandra observations allow us to probe the history of variable
mass loss from the progenitor. The ejecta expands into a low density bubble
followed by interaction with a higher density wind from a red supergiant
consistent with ZAMS mass greater than 16 solar masses. Our results suggest
that a fraction of type IIP supernovae may interact with circumstellar media
set up by non-steady winds.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.4033 [pdf] - 599267
X-Ray emission from SN 2004dj: A Tale of Two Shocks
Submitted: 2012-06-18
Type IIP (Plateau) Supernovae are the most commonly observed variety of core
collapse events. They have been detected in a wide range of wavelengths from
radio, through optical to X-rays. The standard picture of a type IIP supernova
has the blastwave interacting with the progenitor's circumstellar matter to
produce a hot region bounded by a forward and a reverse shock. This region is
thought to be responsible for most of the X-ray and radio emission from these
objects. Yet the origin of X-rays from these supernovae is not well understood
quantitatively. The relative contributions of particle acceleration and
magnetic field amplification in generating the X-ray and radio emission need to
be determined. In this work we analyze archival Chandra observations of SN
2004dj, the nearest supernova since SN 1987A, along with published radio and
optical information. We determine the pre-explosion mass loss rate, blastwave
velocity, electron acceleration and magnetic field amplification efficiencies.
We find that a greater fraction of the thermal energy goes into accelerating
electrons than into amplifying magnetic fields. We conclude that the X-ray
emission arises out of a combination of inverse Compton scattering by
non-thermal electrons accelerated in the forward shock and thermal emission
from supernova ejecta heated by the reverse shock.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.3312 [pdf] - 1084877
Radio Detection of Green Peas: Implications for Magnetic Fields in Young
Galaxies
Submitted: 2011-10-14
Green Peas are a new class of young, emission line galaxies that were
discovered by citizen volunteers in the Galaxy Zoo project. Their low stellar
mass, low metallicity and very high star formation rates make Green Peas the
nearby (z~0.2) analogs of the Lyman-break Galaxies (LBGs) which account for the
bulk of the star formation in the early universe (z~2-5). They thus provide
accessible laboratories in the nearby Universe for understanding star
formation, supernova feedback, particle acceleration and magnetic field
amplification in early galaxies. We report the first direct radio detection of
Green Peas with low frequency GMRT observations and our stacking detection with
archival VLA FIRST data. We show that the radio emission implies that these
extremely young galaxies already have magnetic fields (>30 muG) even larger
than that of the Milky Way. This is at odds with the present understanding of
magnetic field growth based on amplification of seed fields by dynamo action
over a galaxy's lifetime. Our observations strongly favor models with
pregalactic magnetic fields at muG levels.