Normalized to: Xin, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.00941 [pdf] - 2128166
The LSST DESC Data Challenge 1: Generation and Analysis of Synthetic
Images for Next Generation Surveys
Sánchez, F. Javier;
Walter, Chris W.;
Awan, Humna;
Chiang, James;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Gawiser, Eric;
Glanzman, Tom;
Kirkby, David P.;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Slosar, Anže;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Burke, Colin J.;
Digel, Seth W.;
Jarvis, Mike;
Johnson, Tony;
Kelly, Heather;
Krughoff, Simon;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Marshall, Phil J.;
Peterson, John R.;
Price, Paul A.;
Sembroski, Glenn;
Van Klaveren, Brian;
Wiesner, Matthew P.;
Xin, Bo
Submitted: 2020-01-03, last modified: 2020-07-05
Data Challenge 1 (DC1) is the first synthetic dataset produced by the Rubin
Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Dark Energy Science
Collaboration (DESC). DC1 is designed to develop and validate data reduction
and analysis and to study the impact of systematic effects that will affect the
LSST dataset. DC1 is comprised of $r$-band observations of 40 deg$^{2}$ to
10-year LSST depth. We present each stage of the simulation and analysis
process: a) generation, by synthesizing sources from cosmological N-body
simulations in individual sensor-visit images with different observing
conditions; b) reduction using a development version of the LSST Science
Pipelines; and c) matching to the input cosmological catalog for validation and
testing. We verify that testable LSST requirements pass within the fidelity of
DC1. We establish a selection procedure that produces a sufficiently clean
extragalactic sample for clustering analyses and we discuss residual sample
contamination, including contributions from inefficiency in star-galaxy
separation and imperfect deblending. We compute the galaxy power spectrum on
the simulated field and conclude that: i) survey properties have an impact of
50\% of the statistical uncertainty for the scales and models used in DC1 ii) a
selection to eliminate artifacts in the catalogs is necessary to avoid biases
in the measured clustering; iii) the presence of bright objects has a
significant impact (2- to 6-$\sigma$) in the estimated power spectra at small
scales ($\ell > 1200$), highlighting the impact of blending in studies at small
angular scales in LSST;
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.12417 [pdf] - 2119207
Mitigation of LEO Satellite Brightness and Trail Effects on the Rubin
Observatory LSST
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Ivezić, Željko;
Bradshaw, Andrew;
Rawls, Meredith L.;
Xin, Bo;
Yoachim, Peter;
Parejko, John;
Greene, Jared;
Sholl, Michael;
Abbott, Timothy M. C.;
Polin, Daniel
Submitted: 2020-06-22
We report studies on mitigation of optical effects of bright Low-Earth-Orbit
(LEO) satellites on Vera C. Rubin Observatory and its Legacy Survey of Space
and Time (LSST). These include options for pointing the telescope to avoid
satellites, laboratory investigations of bright trails on the Rubin Observatory
LSST Camera sensors, algorithms for correcting image artifacts caused by bright
trails, experiments on darkening SpaceX Starlink satellites, and ground-based
follow-up observations. Starlink satellites with no brightness mitigation are
presently g ~ 5.1 mag, and an initial experiment "DarkSat" is g ~ 6.1 mag.
Future Starlink darkening plans may reach g ~ 7 mag, a brightness level that
enables non-linear image artifact correction to the same level as background
noise. However, the satellite trails will still exist at S/N ~ 100, generating
systematics that may impact data analysis and limiting some science. LEO
satellite trails are wider than a point-spread function because satellites are
slightly out of focus due to their finite distance; for Rubin Observatory's
8.4-m mirror and a satellite at 550 km, this widening effect is about 3 arcsec,
which helps avoid saturation by decreasing the trail's peak surface brightness.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.10487 [pdf] - 1922563
Future Uses of the LSST Facility: Input from the LSST Project Science
Team
Kahn, S.;
Blum, Robert;
Claver, Chuck;
Connolly, Andrew;
Guy, Leanne;
Ivezić, Željko;
Lupton, Robert H.;
O'Mullane, William;
Ritz, Steven;
Strauss, Michael;
Stubbs, Christopher;
Thomas, Sandrine J.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Xin, Bo
Submitted: 2019-07-21
In this white paper, we discuss future uses of the LSST facility after the
planned 10-year survey is complete. We expect the LSST survey to profoundly
affect the scientific landscape over the next ten years, and it is likely that
unexpected discoveries may drive its future scientific program. We discuss
various operations and instrument options that could be considered for an
extended LSST mission beyond ten years.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.2366 [pdf] - 1934226
LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data
Products
Ivezić, Željko;
Kahn, Steven M.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Abel, Bob;
Acosta, Emily;
Allsman, Robyn;
Alonso, David;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Andrew, John;
Angel, James Roger P.;
Angeli, George Z.;
Ansari, Reza;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Araujo, Constanza;
Armstrong, Robert;
Arndt, Kirk T.;
Astier, Pierre;
Aubourg, Éric;
Auza, Nicole;
Axelrod, Tim S.;
Bard, Deborah J.;
Barr, Jeff D.;
Barrau, Aurelian;
Bartlett, James G.;
Bauer, Amanda E.;
Bauman, Brian J.;
Baumont, Sylvain;
Becker, Andrew C.;
Becla, Jacek;
Beldica, Cristina;
Bellavia, Steve;
Bianco, Federica B.;
Biswas, Rahul;
Blanc, Guillaume;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Blandford, Roger D.;
Bloom, Josh S.;
Bogart, Joanne;
Bond, Tim W.;
Borgland, Anders W.;
Borne, Kirk;
Bosch, James F.;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Brackett, Craig A.;
Bradshaw, Andrew;
Brandt, William Nielsen;
Brown, Michael E.;
Bullock, James S.;
Burchat, Patricia;
Burke, David L.;
Cagnoli, Gianpietro;
Calabrese, Daniel;
Callahan, Shawn;
Callen, Alice L.;
Chandrasekharan, Srinivasan;
Charles-Emerson, Glenaver;
Chesley, Steve;
Cheu, Elliott C.;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Chiang, James;
Chirino, Carol;
Chow, Derek;
Ciardi, David R.;
Claver, Charles F.;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Cockrum, Joseph J.;
Coles, Rebecca;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Cook, Kem H.;
Cooray, Asantha;
Covey, Kevin R.;
Cribbs, Chris;
Cui, Wei;
Cutri, Roc;
Daly, Philip N.;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Daruich, Felipe;
Daubard, Guillaume;
Daues, Greg;
Dawson, William;
Delgado, Francisco;
Dellapenna, Alfred;
de Peyster, Robert;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Digel, Seth W.;
Doherty, Peter;
Dubois, Richard;
Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory P.;
Durech, Josef;
Economou, Frossie;
Eracleous, Michael;
Ferguson, Henry;
Figueroa, Enrique;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Focke, Warren;
Foss, Michael D.;
Frank, James;
Freemon, Michael D.;
Gangler, Emmanuel;
Gawiser, Eric;
Geary, John C.;
Gee, Perry;
Geha, Marla;
Gessner, Charles J. B.;
Gibson, Robert R.;
Gilmore, D. Kirk;
Glanzman, Thomas;
Glick, William;
Goldina, Tatiana;
Goldstein, Daniel A.;
Goodenow, Iain;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Gressler, William J.;
Gris, Philippe;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Guyonnet, Augustin;
Haller, Gunther;
Harris, Ron;
Hascall, Patrick A.;
Haupt, Justine;
Hernandez, Fabio;
Herrmann, Sven;
Hileman, Edward;
Hoblitt, Joshua;
Hodgson, John A.;
Hogan, Craig;
Huang, Dajun;
Huffer, Michael E.;
Ingraham, Patrick;
Innes, Walter R.;
Jacoby, Suzanne H.;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jammes, Fabrice;
Jee, James;
Jenness, Tim;
Jernigan, Garrett;
Jevremović, Darko;
Johns, Kenneth;
Johnson, Anthony S.;
Johnson, Margaret W. G.;
Jones, R. Lynne;
Juramy-Gilles, Claire;
Jurić, Mario;
Kalirai, Jason S.;
Kallivayalil, Nitya J.;
Kalmbach, Bryce;
Kantor, Jeffrey P.;
Karst, Pierre;
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Kelly, Heather;
Kessler, Richard;
Kinnison, Veronica;
Kirkby, David;
Knox, Lloyd;
Kotov, Ivan V.;
Krabbendam, Victor L.;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Kubánek, Petr;
Kuczewski, John;
Kulkarni, Shri;
Ku, John;
Kurita, Nadine R.;
Lage, Craig S.;
Lambert, Ron;
Lange, Travis;
Langton, J. Brian;
Guillou, Laurent Le;
Levine, Deborah;
Liang, Ming;
Lim, Kian-Tat;
Lintott, Chris J.;
Long, Kevin E.;
Lopez, Margaux;
Lotz, Paul J.;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Lust, Nate B.;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Marsh, Darren S.;
Marshall, Philip J.;
Marshall, Stuart;
May, Morgan;
McKercher, Robert;
McQueen, Michelle;
Meyers, Joshua;
Migliore, Myriam;
Miller, Michelle;
Mills, David J.;
Miraval, Connor;
Moeyens, Joachim;
Monet, David G.;
Moniez, Marc;
Monkewitz, Serge;
Montgomery, Christopher;
Mueller, Fritz;
Muller, Gary P.;
Arancibia, Freddy Muñoz;
Neill, Douglas R.;
Newbry, Scott P.;
Nief, Jean-Yves;
Nomerotski, Andrei;
Nordby, Martin;
O'Connor, Paul;
Oliver, John;
Olivier, Scot S.;
Olsen, Knut;
O'Mullane, William;
Ortiz, Sandra;
Osier, Shawn;
Owen, Russell E.;
Pain, Reynald;
Palecek, Paul E.;
Parejko, John K.;
Parsons, James B.;
Pease, Nathan M.;
Peterson, J. Matt;
Peterson, John R.;
Petravick, Donald L.;
Petrick, M. E. Libby;
Petry, Cathy E.;
Pierfederici, Francesco;
Pietrowicz, Stephen;
Pike, Rob;
Pinto, Philip A.;
Plante, Raymond;
Plate, Stephen;
Price, Paul A.;
Prouza, Michael;
Radeka, Veljko;
Rajagopal, Jayadev;
Rasmussen, Andrew P.;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Reil, Kevin A.;
Reiss, David J.;
Reuter, Michael A.;
Ridgway, Stephen T.;
Riot, Vincent J.;
Ritz, Steve;
Robinson, Sean;
Roby, William;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rosing, Wayne;
Roucelle, Cecille;
Rumore, Matthew R.;
Russo, Stefano;
Saha, Abhijit;
Sassolas, Benoit;
Schalk, Terry L.;
Schellart, Pim;
Schindler, Rafe H.;
Schmidt, Samuel;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Schneider, Michael D.;
Schoening, William;
Schumacher, German;
Schwamb, Megan E.;
Sebag, Jacques;
Selvy, Brian;
Sembroski, Glenn H.;
Seppala, Lynn G.;
Serio, Andrew;
Serrano, Eduardo;
Shaw, Richard A.;
Shipsey, Ian;
Sick, Jonathan;
Silvestri, Nicole;
Slater, Colin T.;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Smith, R. Chris;
Sobhani, Shahram;
Soldahl, Christine;
Storrie-Lombardi, Lisa;
Stover, Edward;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Street, Rachel A.;
Stubbs, Christopher W.;
Sullivan, Ian S.;
Sweeney, Donald;
Swinbank, John D.;
Szalay, Alexander;
Takacs, Peter;
Tether, Stephen A.;
Thaler, Jon J.;
Thayer, John Gregg;
Thomas, Sandrine;
Thukral, Vaikunth;
Tice, Jeffrey;
Trilling, David E.;
Turri, Max;
Van Berg, Richard;
Berk, Daniel Vanden;
Vetter, Kurt;
Virieux, Francoise;
Vucina, Tomislav;
Wahl, William;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Walsh, Brian;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Daniel L.;
Wang, Shin-Yawn;
Warner, Michael;
Wiecha, Oliver;
Willman, Beth;
Winters, Scott E.;
Wittman, David;
Wolff, Sidney C.;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
Wu, Xiuqin;
Xin, Bo;
Yoachim, Peter;
Zhan, Hu
Submitted: 2008-05-15, last modified: 2018-05-23
(Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in
the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of
science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will
have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is
driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking
an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and
mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at
Cerro Pach\'{o}n in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m
effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg$^2$ field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel
camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second
exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given
night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000
square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5$\sigma$
point-source depth in a single visit in $r$ will be $\sim 24.5$ (AB). The
project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations
by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg$^2$ with
$\delta<+34.5^\circ$, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, $ugrizy$,
covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time
will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a
18,000 deg$^2$ region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the
anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to $r\sim27.5$. The
remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a
Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products,
including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion
objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02845 [pdf] - 1775544
A Study of the Point Spread Function in SDSS Images
Submitted: 2018-05-08
We use SDSS imaging data in $ugriz$ passbands to study the shape of the point
spread function (PSF) profile and the variation of its width with wavelength
and time. We find that the PSF profile is well described by theoretical
predictions based on von K\'{a}rm\'{a}n's turbulence theory. The observed PSF
radial profile can be parametrized by only two parameters, the profile's full
width at half maximum (FWHM) and a normalization of the contribution of an
empirically determined "instrumental" PSF. The profile shape is very similar to
the "double gaussian plus power-law wing" decomposition used by SDSS image
processing pipeline, but here it is successfully modeled with two free model
parameters, rather than six as in SDSS pipeline. The FWHM variation with
wavelength follows the $\lambda^{\alpha}$ power law, where $\alpha \approx-0.3$
and is correlated with the FWHM itself. The observed behavior is much better
described by von K\'{a}rm\'{a}n's turbulence theory with the outer scale
parameter in the range 5$-$100 m, than by the Kolmogorov's turbulence theory.
We also measure the temporal and angular structure functions for FWHM and
compare them to simulations and results from literature. The angular structure
function saturates at scales beyond 0.5$-$1.0 degree. The power spectrum of the
temporal behavior is found to be broadly consistent with a damped random walk
model with characteristic timescale in the range $\sim5-30$ minutes, though
data show a shallower high-frequency behavior. The latter is well fit by a
single power law with index in the range $-1.5$ to $-1.0$. A hybrid model is
likely needed to fully capture both the low-frequency and high-frequency
behavior of the temporal variations of atmospheric seeing.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.04839 [pdf] - 1298620
Curvature Wavefront Sensing for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
Submitted: 2015-06-16, last modified: 2015-10-22
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will use an active optics system
(AOS) to maintain alignment and surface figure on its three large mirrors.
Corrective actions fed to the LSST AOS are determined from information derived
from 4 curvature wavefront sensors located at the corners of the focal plane.
Each wavefront sensor is a split detector such that the halves are 1mm on
either side of focus. In this paper we describe the extensions to published
curvature wavefront sensing algorithms needed to address challenges presented
by the LSST, namely the large central obscuration, the fast f/1.23 beam,
off-axis pupil distortions, and vignetting at the sensor locations. We also
describe corrections needed for the split sensors and the effects from the
angular separation of different stars providing the intra- and extra-focal
images. Lastly, we present simulations that demonstrate convergence, linearity,
and negligible noise when compared to atmospheric effects when the algorithm
extensions are applied to the LSST optical system. The algorithm extensions
reported here are generic and can easily be adapted to other wide-field optical
systems including similar telescopes with large central obscuration and
off-axis curvature sensing.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.1979 [pdf] - 1151921
Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Star Challenge
Kitching, T. D.;
Rowe, B.;
Gill, M.;
Heymans, C.;
Massey, R.;
Witherick, D.;
Courbin, F.;
Georgatzis, K.;
Gentile, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Li, G. L.;
Mariglis, A. P.;
Meylan, G.;
Storkey, A.;
Xin, B.
Submitted: 2012-10-06
We present the results from the first public blind PSF reconstruction
challenge, the GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Star
Challenge. Reconstruction of a spatially varying PSF, sparsely sampled by
stars, at non-star positions is a critical part in the image analysis for weak
lensing where inaccuracies in the modelled ellipticity and size-squared can
impact the ability to measure the shapes of galaxies. This is of importance
because weak lensing is a particularly sensitive probe of dark energy, and can
be used to map the mass distribution of large scale structure. Participants in
the challenge were presented with 27,500 stars over 1300 images subdivided into
26 sets, where in each set a category change was made in the type or spatial
variation of the PSF. Thirty submissions were made by 9 teams. The best methods
reconstructed the PSF with an accuracy of ~0.00025 in ellipticity and ~0.00074
in size squared. For a fixed pixel scale narrower PSFs were found to be more
difficult to model than larger PSFs, and the PSF reconstruction was severely
degraded with the inclusion of an atmospheric turbulence model (although this
result is likely to be a strong function of the amplitude of the turbulence
power spectrum).
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.0571 [pdf] - 570193
Fast Shape Estimation for Galaxies and Stars
Submitted: 2012-03-02, last modified: 2012-10-02
Model fitting is frequently used to determine the shape of galaxies and the
point spread function, for examples, in weak lensing analyses or morphology
studies aiming at probing the evolution of galaxies. However, the number of
parameters in the model, as well as the number of objects, are often so large
as to limit the use of model fitting for future large surveys. In this article,
we propose a set of algorithms to speed up the fitting process. Our approach is
divided into three distinctive steps: centroiding, ellipticity measurement, and
profile fitting. We demonstrate that we can derive the position and ellipticity
of an object analytically in the first two steps and thus leave only a small
number of parameters to be derived through model fitting. The position,
ellipticity, and shape parameters can then used in constructing orthonomal
basis functions such as s\'ersiclets for better galaxy image reconstruction. We
assess the efficiency and accuracy of the algorithms with simulated images. We
have not taken into account the deconvolution of the point spread function,
which most weak lensing analyses do.