sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Wygoda, N.

Normalized to: Wygoda, N.

4 article(s) in total. 6 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.00969  [pdf] - 1824356
Type Ia supernovae have two physical width-luminosity relations and they favor sub-Chandrasekhar and direct collision models. I. Bolometric
Comments: Computer codes for extracting $t_0$ from observations and models and for calculating gamma-ray transfer in 1D-3D are provided
Submitted: 2017-11-02, last modified: 2019-01-29
While the width-luminosity relation (WLR) among type Ia supernovae (slower is brighter) has been extensively studied, its physical basis has not been convincingly identified. In particular, the 'width' has not been quantitatively linked yet to a physical time scale. We demonstrate that there are two robust fundamental time scales that 1. can be calculated based on integral quantities of the ejecta, with little dependence on radiation transfer modeling and 2. can be inferred from observations. The first is the gamma-ray escape time $t_0$, which determines the long-term evolution of the bolometric light curve and is studied in this Paper I. The second is the recombination time of $^{56}$Fe and $^{56}$Co, which sets the long-term color evolution of the emitted light and is studied in Paper II. Here we show that the gamma-ray escape time $t_0$ can be derived with $\sim 15\%$ accuracy from bolometric observations based on first principles. When applied to a sample of supernovae, the observed values of $t_0$ span a narrow range of $30-45$ days for the wide range of observed $^{56}\rm Ni$ masses $0.1M_{\odot}\lesssim M_{^{56}\rm Ni}\lesssim 1 M_{\odot}$. %This (trivial) bolometric WLR This narrow range of the gamma-ray escape time across the range of luminosities (a trivial WLR) is consistent with central detonations and direct collisions of sub-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs (WDs) but not with delayed detonation models for explosions of Chandrasekhar mass WDs, which are therefore disfavored as the primary channel for the population of type Ia supernovae. Computer codes for extracting $t_0$ from observations and models and for calculating gamma-ray transfer in 1D-3D are provided.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1805.06907  [pdf] - 1824374
Type Ia supernovae have two physical width-luminosity relations and they favor sub-Chandrasekhar and direct collision models - II. Color evolution
Comments: The Monte Carlo radiation transfer code URILIGHT used for the numerical calculations is provided
Submitted: 2018-05-17, last modified: 2019-01-29
While the width-luminosity relation (WLR) among type Ia supernovae (slower is brighter) is one of the best studied properties of this type of events, its physical basis has not been identified convincingly. The 'luminosity' is known to be related to a clear physical quantity -- the amount of $^{56}$Ni synthesized, but the 'width' has not been quantitatively linked yet to a physical time scale. We show that the recombination time of $^{56}$Fe and $^{56}$Co from doubly to singly ionized states causes the typical observed break in the color curve B-V due to a cliff in the mean opacities, and is a robust width measure of the light curve, which is insensitive to radiation transfer uncertainties. A simple photospheric model is shown to predict the recombination time to an accuracy of $\sim5$ days, allowing a quantitative understanding of the color WLR. Two physical times scales of the width luminosity relation are shown to be set by two column densities -- the total column density which sets the gamma-ray escape time $t_0$ (previous Paper I) and the $^{56}$Ni column density which sets the recombination time (this Paper II). Central detonations of sub-$\rm M_{ch}$ WDs and direct WD collision models have gamma-ray escape times and recombination times which are consistent with observations across the luminosity range of type Ia's. Delayed detonation Chandrasekhar mass models have recombination times that are broadly consistent with observations, with tension at the bright end of the luminosity range and inconsistent gamma-ray escape times at the faint end.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1504.01056  [pdf] - 1429355
The energy budget of GRBs based on updated prompt \& afterglow observations
Comments: An expanded discussion of the absence of energy injection and 'flat X-ray phases' in the majority of bursts
Submitted: 2015-04-04, last modified: 2015-11-23
We compare the isotropic equivalent 15-2000 keV gamma-ray energy, E_gamma, emitted by a sample of 91 swift Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) with known redshifts, with the isotropic equivalent fireball energy, E_fb, as estimated within the fireball model framework from X-ray afterglow observations of these bursts. The uncertainty in E_gamma, which spans the range of ~10^51 erg to ~10^53.5 erg, is approximately 25% on average, due mainly to the extrapolation from the BAT detector band to the 15-2000 keV band. The uncertainty in E_fb is approximately a factor of 2, due mainly to the X-ray measurements' scatter. We find E_gamma and E_fb to be tightly correlated. The average(std) of {\eta}^11hr_gamma is approximately log_10(E_gamma/(3{\epsilon} _eE^11hr_fb)) are -0.34(0.60), and the upper limit on the intrinsic spread of {\eta}_gamma is approximately 0.5 ({\epsilon}_e is the fraction of shocked plasma energy carried by electrons and E^x hr_fb is inferred from the X-ray flux at x hours). We also find that E_fb inferred from X-ray observations at 3 and 11 hours are similar, with an average(std) of log_10(E^3hr_fb/E^11hr_fb) of 0.04(0.28). The small variance of {\eta}_gamma implies that burst-to-burst variations in {\epsilon}_e and in the efficiency of fireball energy conversion to gamma-rays are small, and suggests that both are of order unity. The small variance of {\eta}_gamma and the similarity of E^3hr_fb and E^11hr_fb further imply that {\epsilon}_e does not vary significantly with shock Lorentz factor, and that for most bursts the modification of fireball energy during the afterglow phase, by processes such as radiative losses or extended duration energy injection, are not significant. Finally, our results imply that if fireballs are indeed jets, then the jet opening angle satisfies {\theta}>0.1 for most cases. [abridged]
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1102.5618  [pdf] - 1052387
Relativistic Jet Dynamics and Calorimetry of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2011-02-28
We present numerical solutions of the 2D relativistic hydrodynamics equations describing the deceleration and expansion of highly relativistic conical jets, of opening angles 0.05<theta<0.2, propagating into a medium of uniform density. Jet evolution is followed from a collimated relativistic outflow through to the quasi-spherical non-relativistic phase. We show that relativistic sideways expansion becomes significant beyond the radius R at which the expansion Lorentz factor drops to 1/theta. This is consistent with simple analytic estimates, which predict faster sideways expansion than has been claimed based on earlier numerical modeling. For t>R/c the emission of radiation from the jet blast wave is similar to that of a spherical blast wave carrying the same energy. Thus, the total (calorimetric) energy of GRB blast waves may be estimated with only a small fractional error based on t>R/c observations.