Normalized to: Wright, I.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.00192 [pdf] - 1557861
Decay of COSAC and Ptolemy Mass Spectra at Comet
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Krüger, Harald;
Goesmann, Fred;
Giri, Chaitanya;
Wright, Ian;
Morse, Andrew;
Bredehöft, Jan Hendrik;
Ulamec, Stephan;
Cozzoni, Barbara;
Ehrenfreund, Pascale;
Gautier, Thomas;
McKenna-Lawlor, Susan;
Raulin, Francois;
Steininger, Harald;
Szopa, Cyril
Submitted: 2017-02-01
The Rosetta lander Philae successfully landed on the nucleus of comet
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 12 November 2014. Philae is equipped with two gas
analyzers: The Cometary Sampling and Composition experiment (COSAC) and the gas
chromatograph and mass spectrometer Ptolemy. On 12 to 14 November 2014 both
instruments measured the organic composition of the comet nucleus material
through seven measurements in sniffing mode during Philae's hopping and at its
final landing site Abydos. We compare the temporal evolution of intensities of
several ion species identified by both mass spectrometers. For COSAC this is
the first analysis of the temporal behaviour of the measured ion species. All
ion species showed the highest intensities in the first spectra measured by
both instruments about 20 to 30 minutes after Philae's first touchdown at
Agilkia, and a decay during the six consecutive measurements at Abydos. Both
instruments measured a nearly identical decay of the water peak (m/z 18), and
also CO (m/z 28) behaved similarly. In the COSAC measurements the peak at m/z
44 decays much slower than all the other ion species, including the water peak.
In particular, the m/z 44 peak decays much slower in the COSAC measurements
than in the Ptolemy data. This supports our earlier interpretation that COSAC
for the first time analyzed a regolith sample from a cometary nucleus in situ,
while Ptolemy measured cometary gas from the ambient coma. The m/z 44 peak
measured by COSAC was likely dominated by organic species, whereas the peak
measured by Ptolemy was interpreted to be mostly due to $CO_2$. Ion species
heavier than m/z 30 tend to decay somewhat slower in the COSAC measurements
than in the Ptolemy data, which may be related to differences in the exhaust
designs between both instruments.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05893 [pdf] - 1411421
Subsurface characterization of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's Abydos site
Brugger, B.;
Mousis, O.;
Morse, A.;
Marboeuf, U.;
Jorda, L.;
Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.;
Andrews, D.;
Barber, S.;
Lamy, P.;
Luspay-Kuti, A.;
Mandt, K.;
Morgan, G.;
Sheridan, S.;
Vernazza, P.;
Wright, I. P.
Submitted: 2016-03-18
On November 12, 2014, the ESA/Rosetta descent module Philae landed on the
Abydos site of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Aboard this module, the Ptolemy
mass spectrometer measured a CO/CO2 ratio of 0.07 +/- 0.04 which differs
substantially from the value obtained in the coma by the Rosetta/ROSINA
instrument, suggesting a heterogeneity in the comet nucleus. To understand this
difference, we investigated the physico-chemical properties of the Abydos
subsurface leading to CO/CO2 ratios close to that observed by Ptolemy at the
surface of this region. We used a comet nucleus model that takes into account
different water ice phase changes (amorphous ice, crystalline ice and
clathrates), as well as diffusion of molecules throughout the pores of the
matrix. The input parameters of the model were optimized for the Abydos site
and the ROSINA CO/CO2 measured ratio is assumed to correspond to the bulk value
in the nucleus. We find that all considered structures of water ice are able to
reproduce the Ptolemy observation with a time difference not exceeding ~50
days, i.e. lower than ~2% on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's orbital period. The
suspected heterogeneity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's nucleus is also found
possible only if it is constituted of crystalline ices. If the icy phase is
made of amorphous ice or clathrates, the difference between Ptolemy and
ROSINA's measurements would rather originate from the spatial variations in
illumination on the nucleus surface. An eventual new measurement of the CO/CO2
ratio at Abydos by Ptolemy could be decisive to distinguish between the three
water ice structures.