Normalized to: Wolf, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02378 [pdf] - 1893289
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy
Survey: Photometric Pipeline and Light Curve Data Release
Brout, D.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Kessler, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, T. M.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lasker, J.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Allam, S.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Brown, P.;
Castander, F. J.;
Childress, M.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
Herner, K.;
Kasai, E.;
March, M.;
Morganson, E.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Wester, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-06-01
We present griz light curves of 251 Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) from the
first 3 years of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program's (DES-SN)
spectroscopically classified sample. The photometric pipeline described in this
paper produces the calibrated fluxes and associated uncertainties used in the
cosmological parameter analysis (Brout et al. 2018-SYS, DES Collaboration et
al. 2018) by employing a scene modeling approach that simultaneously forward
models a variable transient flux and temporally constant host galaxy. We inject
artificial point sources onto DECam images to test the accuracy of our
photometric method. Upon comparison of input and measured artificial supernova
fluxes, we find flux biases peak at 3 mmag. We require corrections to our
photometric uncertainties as a function of host galaxy surface brightness at
the transient location, similar to that seen by the DES Difference Imaging
Pipeline used to discover transients. The public release of the light curves
can be found at https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/sn.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02374 [pdf] - 1880991
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy
Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Angus, C.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, P.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kovacs, E.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Spinka, H.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swann, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wiseman, P.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-10
We present the first cosmological parameter constraints using measurements of
type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN). The analysis uses a subsample of 207 spectroscopically confirmed SNe
Ia from the first three years of DES-SN, combined with a low-redshift sample of
122 SNe from the literature. Our "DES-SN3YR" result from these 329 SNe Ia is
based on a series of companion analyses and improvements covering SN Ia
discovery, spectroscopic selection, photometry, calibration, distance bias
corrections, and evaluation of systematic uncertainties. For a flat LCDM model
we find a matter density Omega_m = 0.331 +_ 0.038. For a flat wCDM model, and
combining our SN Ia constraints with those from the cosmic microwave background
(CMB), we find a dark energy equation of state w = -0.978 +_ 0.059, and Omega_m
= 0.321 +_ 0.018. For a flat w0waCDM model, and combining probes from SN Ia,
CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations, we find w0 = -0.885 +_ 0.114 and wa =
-0.387 +_ 0.430. These results are in agreement with a cosmological constant
and with previous constraints using SNe Ia (Pantheon, JLA).
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02381 [pdf] - 1876407
Steve: A hierarchical Bayesian model for Supernova Cosmology
Hinton, S. R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Kim, A. G.;
Brout, D.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Kessler, R.;
Lasker, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Childress, M.;
Morganson, E.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-01
We present a new Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM) named Steve for performing
type Ia supernova (SNIa) cosmology fits. This advances previous works by
including an improved treatment of Malmquist bias, accounting for additional
sources of systematic uncertainty, and increasing numerical efficiency. Given
light curve fit parameters, redshifts, and host-galaxy masses, we fit Steve
simultaneously for parameters describing cosmology, SNIa populations, and
systematic uncertainties. Selection effects are characterised using Monte-Carlo
simulations. We demonstrate its implementation by fitting realisations of SNIa
datasets where the SNIa model closely follows that used in Steve. Next, we
validate on more realistic SNANA simulations of SNIa samples from the Dark
Energy Survey and low-redshift surveys. These simulated datasets contain more
than $60\,000$ SNeIa, which we use to evaluate biases in the recovery of
cosmological parameters, specifically the equation-of-state of dark energy,
$w$. This is the most rigorous test of a BHM method applied to SNIa cosmology
fitting, and reveals small $w$-biases that depend on the simulated SNIa
properties, in particular the intrinsic SNIa scatter model. This $w$-bias is
less than $0.03$ on average, less than half the statistical uncertainty on
$w$.These simulation test results are a concern for BHM cosmology fitting
applications on large upcoming surveys, and therefore future development will
focus on minimising the sensitivity of Steve to the SNIa intrinsic scatter
model.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.09565 [pdf] - 1791507
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy
Survey: Survey Overview and Supernova Spectroscopy
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Kim, A. G.;
Möller, A.;
Sako, M.;
Castander, F. J.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Lidman, C.;
Scolnic, D.;
Brout, D.;
Davis, T. M.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kessler, R.;
Lasker, J.;
Macaulay, E.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Zhang, B.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Casas, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crawford, S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Graham, M. L.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Wiseman, P.;
Zheng, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2018-11-23
We present spectroscopy from the first three seasons of the Dark Energy
Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN). We describe the supernova spectroscopic
program in full: strategy, observations, data reduction, and classification. We
have spectroscopically confirmed 307 supernovae, including 251 type Ia
supernovae (SNe Ia) over a redshift range of $0.017 < z < 0.85$. We determine
the effective spectroscopic selection function for our sample, and use it to
investigate the redshift-dependent bias on the distance moduli of SNe Ia we
have classified. We also provide a full overview of the strategy, observations,
and data products of DES-SN, which has discovered 12,015 likely supernovae
during these first three seasons. The data presented here are used for the
first cosmology analysis by DES-SN ('DES-SN3YR'), the results of which are
given in DES Collaboration (2018a).
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.00591 [pdf] - 1751774
New Science, New Media: An Assessment of the Online Education and Public
Outreach Initiatives of The Dark Energy Survey
Wolf, R. C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Nord, B.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Biron, L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Das, R.;
Ferte, A.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Jennings, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Li, T. S.;
Lingard, T.;
Moller, A.;
Muir, J.;
Nagasawa, D. Q.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-02, last modified: 2018-09-18
As large-scale international collaborations become the standard for astronomy
research, a wealth of opportunities have emerged to create innovative education
and public outreach (EPO) programming. In the past two decades, large
collaborations have focused EPO strategies around published data products.
Newer collaborations have begun to explore other avenues of public engagement
before and after data are made available. We present a case study of the online
EPO program of The Dark Energy Survey, currently one of the largest
international astronomy collaborations actively taking data. DES EPO is unique
at this scale in astronomy, as far as we are aware, as it evolved organically
from scientists' passion for EPO and is entirely organized and implemented by
the volunteer efforts of collaboration scientists. We summarize the strategy
and implementation of eight EPO initiatives. For content distributed via social
media, we present reach and user statistics over the 2016 calendar year. DES
EPO online products reached ~2,500 users per post, and 94% of these users
indicate a predisposition to science-related interests. We find no obvious
correlation between post type and post reach, with the most popular posts
featuring the intersections of science and art and/or popular culture. We
conclude that one key issue of the online DES EPO program was designing
material which would inspire new interest in science. The greatest difficulty
of the online DES EPO program was sustaining scientist participation and
collaboration support; the most successful programs are those which capitalized
on the hobbies of participating scientists. We present statistics and
recommendations, along with observations from individual experience, as a
potentially instructive resource for scientists or EPO professionals interested
in organizing EPO programs and partnerships for large science collaborations or
organizations.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01536 [pdf] - 1747811
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Avila, S.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sanchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Moller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
ONeill, C. R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-08-28
We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of large-scale structure and lensing
correlations. Two-point correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01532 [pdf] - 1681410
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak
lensing source galaxies
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Rau, M. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Alarcon, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gatti, M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Mudd, D.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-11
We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensing-weighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z-\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30-band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, pre-seeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weak-lensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photo-z procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.02474 [pdf] - 1662599
A Bayesian approach to truncated data sets: An application to Malmquist
bias in Supernova Cosmology
Submitted: 2018-04-06
Large scale astronomical surveys are going wider and deeper than ever before.
However, astronomers, cosmologists and theorists continue to face the perennial
issue that their data sets are often incomplete in magnitude space and must be
carefully treated in order to avoid Malmquist bias, especially in the field of
supernova cosmology. Historically, cosmological parameter inference in
supernova cosmology was done using $\chi^2$ methodology; however, recent years
have seen a rise in the use of Bayesian Hierarchical Models. In this paper we
develop a Bayesian Hierarchical methodology to account for magnitude limited
surveys and present a specific application to cosmological parameter inference
and model selection in supernova cosmology.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.04535 [pdf] - 1637609
Studying the Ultraviolet Spectrum of the First Spectroscopically
Confirmed Supernova at redshift two
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Galbany, L.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Inserra, C.;
Lidman, C.;
Rest, A.;
Schirmer, M.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Zheng, W.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Angus, C. R.;
Brown, P. J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Finley, D. A.;
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.;
Gutierrez, C. P.;
Kessler, R.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Marriner, J.;
Moller, A.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Prajs, S.;
Thomas, R.;
Wolf, R.;
Zenteno, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miguel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-11
We present observations of DES16C2nm, the first spectroscopically confirmed
hydrogen-free superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) at redshift z~2. DES16C2nm was
discovered by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Supernova Program, with follow-up
photometric data from the Hubble Space Telescope, Gemini, and the European
Southern Observatory Very Large Telescope supplementing the DES data.
Spectroscopic observations confirm DES16C2nm to be at z=1.998, and
spectroscopically similar to Gaia16apd (a SLSN-I at z=0.102), with a peak
absolute magnitude of U=-22.26$\pm$0.06. The high redshift of DES16C2nm
provides a unique opportunity to study the ultraviolet (UV) properties of
SLSNe-I. Combining DES16C2nm with ten similar events from the literature, we
show that there exists a homogeneous class of SLSNe-I in the UV (~2500A), with
peak luminosities in the (rest-frame) U band, and increasing absorption to
shorter wavelengths. There is no evidence that the mean photometric and
spectroscopic properties of SLSNe-I differ between low (z<1) and high redshift
(z>1), but there is clear evidence of diversity in the spectrum at <2000A,
possibly caused by the variations in temperature between events. No significant
correlations are observed between spectral line velocities and photometric
luminosity. Using these data, we estimate that SLSNe-I can be discovered to
z=3.8 by DES. While SLSNe-I are typically identified from their blue observed
colors at low redshift (z<1), we highlight that at z>2 these events appear
optically red, peaking in the observer-frame z-band. Such characteristics are
critical to identify these objects with future facilities such as the Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope, Euclid, and the Wide-Field Infrared Survey
Telescope, which should detect such SLSNe-I to z=3.5, 3.7, and 6.6,
respectively.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00992 [pdf] - 1648618
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods
and Systematics Characterization
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Davis, C.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rau, M. M.;
DeRose, J.;
De Vicente, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hoyle, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.
Submitted: 2017-09-04
We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clustering-based method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we cross-correlate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo-$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo-$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forest-based photo-$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo-$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.02290 [pdf] - 1622248
Chemical Abundance Analysis of Three $\alpha$-Poor, Metal-Poor Stars in
the Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxy Horologium I
Nagasawa, D. Q.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Simon, J. D.;
Hansen, T. T.;
Li, T. S.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Balbinot, E.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Pace, A. B.;
Strigari, L. E.;
Pellegrino, C. M.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Suntzeff, N. B.;
Bechtol, K.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
March, M.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.
Submitted: 2017-08-07
We present chemical abundance measurements of three stars in the ultra-faint
dwarf galaxy Horologium I, a Milky Way satellite discovered by the Dark Energy
Survey. Using high resolution spectroscopic observations we measure the
metallicity of the three stars as well as abundance ratios of several
$\alpha$-elements, iron-peak elements, and neutron-capture elements. The
abundance pattern is relatively consistent among all three stars, which have a
low average metallicity of [Fe/H] $\sim -2.6$ and are not $\alpha$-enhanced
([$\alpha$/Fe] $\sim 0.0$). This result is unexpected when compared to other
low-metallicity stars in the Galactic halo and other ultra-faint dwarfs and
hints at an entirely different mechanism for the enrichment of Hor I compared
to other satellites. We discuss possible scenarios that could lead to this
observed nucleosynthetic signature including extended star formation, a
Population III supernova, and a possible association with the Large Magellanic
Cloud.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.03087 [pdf] - 1511907
A new approach for obtaining cosmological constraints from Type Ia
Supernovae using Approximate Bayesian Computation
Submitted: 2016-11-09
Cosmological parameter estimation techniques that robustly account for
systematic measurement uncertainties will be crucial for the next generation of
cosmological surveys. We present a new analysis method, superABC, for obtaining
cosmological constraints from Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) light curves using
Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) without any likelihood assumptions. The
ABC method works by using a forward model simulation of the data where
systematic uncertainties can be simulated and marginalized over. A key feature
of the method presented here is the use of two distinct metrics, the `Tripp'
and `Light Curve' metrics, which allow us to compare the simulated data to the
observed data set. The Tripp metric takes as input the parameters of models fit
to each light curve with the SALT-II method, whereas the Light Curve metric
uses the measured fluxes directly without model fitting. We apply the superABC
sampler to a simulated data set of $\sim$1000 SNe corresponding to the first
season of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program. Varying $\Omega_m, w_0,
\alpha$ and $\beta$ and a magnitude offset parameter, with no systematics we
obtain $\Delta(w_0) = w_0^{\rm true} - w_0^{\rm best \, fit} = -0.036\pm0.109$
(a $\sim11$% 1$\sigma$ uncertainty) using the Tripp metric and $\Delta(w_0) =
-0.055\pm0.068$ (a $\sim7$% 1$\sigma$ uncertainty) using the Light Curve
metric. Including 1% calibration uncertainties in four passbands, adding 4 more
parameters, we obtain $\Delta(w_0) = -0.062\pm0.132$ (a $\sim14$% 1$\sigma$
uncertainty) using the Tripp metric. Overall we find a $17$% increase in the
uncertainty on $w_0$ with systematics compared to without. We contrast this
with a MCMC approach where systematic effects are approximately included. We
find that the MCMC method slightly underestimates the impact of calibration
uncertainties for this simulated data set.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.06138 [pdf] - 1513524
Host Galaxy Identification for Supernova Surveys
Gupta, Ravi R.;
Kuhlmann, Steve;
Kovacs, Eve;
Spinka, Harold;
Kessler, Richard;
Goldstein, Daniel A.;
Liotine, Camille;
Pomian, Katarzyna;
D'Andrea, Chris B.;
Sullivan, Mark;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Finley, David A.;
Fischer, John A.;
Foley, Ryan J.;
Kim, Alex G.;
Papadopoulos, Andreas;
Sako, Masao;
Scolnic, Daniel M.;
Smith, Mathew;
Tucker, Brad E.;
Uddin, Syed;
Wolf, Rachel C.;
Yuan, Fang;
Abbott, Tim M. C.;
Abdalla, Filipe B.;
Benoit-Levy, Aurelien;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Brooks, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Cunha, Carlos E.;
da Costa, Luiz N.;
Desai, Shantanu;
Doel, Peter;
Eifler, Tim F.;
Evrard, August E.;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Gruen, Daniel;
Gruendl, Robert;
James, David J.;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Marshall, Jennifer L.;
Miquel, Ramon;
Plazas, Andres A.;
Romer, A. Kathy;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Schubnell, Michael;
Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio;
Sobreira, Flavia;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly E. C.;
Tarle, Gregory;
Walker, Alistair R.;
Wester, William
Submitted: 2016-04-20, last modified: 2016-06-24
Host galaxy identification is a crucial step for modern supernova (SN)
surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Large Synoptic Survey
Telescope (LSST), which will discover SNe by the thousands. Spectroscopic
resources are limited, so in the absence of real-time SN spectra these surveys
must rely on host galaxy spectra to obtain accurate redshifts for the Hubble
diagram and to improve photometric classification of SNe. In addition, SN
luminosities are known to correlate with host-galaxy properties. Therefore,
reliable identification of host galaxies is essential for cosmology and SN
science. We simulate SN events and their locations within their host galaxies
to develop and test methods for matching SNe to their hosts. We use both real
and simulated galaxy catalog data from the Advanced Camera for Surveys General
Catalog and MICECATv2.0, respectively. We also incorporate "hostless" SNe
residing in undetected faint hosts into our analysis, with an assumed hostless
rate of 5%. Our fully automated algorithm is run on catalog data and matches
SNe to their hosts with 91% accuracy. We find that including a machine learning
component, run after the initial matching algorithm, improves the accuracy
(purity) of the matching to 97% with a 2% cost in efficiency (true positive
rate). Although the exact results are dependent on the details of the survey
and the galaxy catalogs used, the method of identifying host galaxies we
outline here can be applied to any transient survey.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.02674 [pdf] - 1396853
SDSS-II Supernova Survey: An Analysis of the Largest Sample of Type Ia
Supernovae and Correlations with Host-Galaxy Spectral Properties
Wolf, Rachel C.;
D'Andrea, Chris B.;
Gupta, Ravi R.;
Sako, Masao;
Fischer, John A.;
Kessler, Rick;
Jha, Saurabh W.;
March, Marisa C.;
Scolnic, Daniel M.;
Fischer, Johanna-Laina;
Campbell, Heather;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Olmstead, Matthew D.;
Richmond, Michael;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Smith, Mathew
Submitted: 2016-02-08
Using the largest single-survey sample of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) to
date, we study the relationship between properties of SNe Ia and those of their
host galaxies, focusing primarily on correlations with Hubble residuals (HR).
Our sample consists of 345 photometrically-classified or
spectroscopically-confirmed SNeIa discovered as part of the SDSS-II Supernova
Survey (SDSS-SNS). This analysis utilizes host-galaxy spectroscopy obtained
during the SDSS-I/II spectroscopic survey and from an ancillary program on the
SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) that obtained spectra
for nearly all host galaxies of SDSS-II SN candidates. In addition, we use
photometric host-galaxy properties from the SDSS-SNS data release (Sako et al.
2014) such as host stellar mass and star-formation rate. We confirm the
well-known relation between HR and host-galaxy mass and find a 3.6{\sigma}
significance of a non-zero linear slope. We also recover correlations between
HR and host-galaxy gas-phase metallicity and specific star-formation rate as
they are reported in the literature. With our large dataset, we examine
correlations between HR and multiple host-galaxy properties simultaneously and
find no evidence of a significant correlation. We also independently analyze
our spectroscopically-confirmed and photometrically-classified SNe Ia and
comment on the significance of similar combined datasets for future surveys.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.06043 [pdf] - 1359092
DES14X3taz: A Type I Superluminous Supernova Showing a Luminous, Rapidly
Cooling Initial Pre-Peak Bump
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Castander, F. J.;
Casas, R.;
Prajs, S.;
Papadopoulos, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Karpenka, N. V.;
Bernard, S. R.;
Brown, P.;
Cartier, R.;
Cooke, J.;
Curtin, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Howell, D. A.;
Inserra, C.;
Kessler, R.;
Lidman, C.;
Marriner, J.;
Nugent, P.;
Pritchard, T. A.;
Sako, M.;
Smartt, S.;
Smith, R. C.;
Spinka, H.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Zenteno, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2015-12-18, last modified: 2016-01-19
We present DES14X3taz, a new hydrogen-poor super luminous supernova (SLSN-I)
discovered by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) supernova program, with additional
photometric data provided by the Survey Using DECam for Superluminous
Supernovae (SUDSS). Spectra obtained using OSIRIS on the Gran Telescopio
CANARIAS (GTC) show DES14X3taz is a SLSN-I at z=0.608. Multi-color photometry
reveals a double-peaked light curve: a blue and relatively bright initial peak
that fades rapidly prior to the slower rise of the main light curve. Our
multi-color photometry allows us, for the first time, to show that the initial
peak cools from 22,000K to 8,000K over 15 rest-frame days, and is faster and
brighter than any published core-collapse supernova, reaching 30% of the
bolometric luminosity of the main peak. No physical Nickel powered model can
fit this initial peak. We show that a shock-cooling model followed by a
magnetar driving the second phase of the light curve can adequately explain the
entire light curve of DES14X3taz. Models involving the shock-cooling of
extended circumstellar material at a distance of ~400 solar radii are preferred
over the cooling of shock-heated surface layers of a stellar envelope. We
compare DES14X3taz to the few double-peaked SLSN-I events in the literature.
Although the rise-times and characteristics of these initial peaks differ,
there exists the tantalizing possibility that they can be explained by one
physical interpretation.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.02936 [pdf] - 1330162
Automated Transient Identification in the Dark Energy Survey
Goldstein, D. A.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Fischer, J. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nugent, P.;
Papadopoulos, A.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Banerji, M.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Covarrubias, R.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
James, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2015-04-12, last modified: 2015-12-21
We describe an algorithm for identifying point-source transients and moving
objects on reference-subtracted optical images containing artifacts of
processing and instrumentation. The algorithm makes use of the supervised
machine learning technique known as Random Forest. We present results from its
use in the Dark Energy Survey Supernova program (DES-SN), where it was trained
using a sample of 898,963 signal and background events generated by the
transient detection pipeline. After reprocessing the data collected during the
first DES-SN observing season (Sep. 2013 through Feb. 2014) using the
algorithm, the number of transient candidates eligible for human scanning
decreased by a factor of 13.4, while only 1 percent of the artificial Type Ia
supernovae (SNe) injected into search images to monitor survey efficiency were
lost, most of which were very faint events. Here we characterize the
algorithm's performance in detail, and we discuss how it can inform pipeline
design decisions for future time-domain imaging surveys, such as the Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope and the Zwicky Transient Facility. An implementation
of the algorithm and the training data used in this paper are available at
http://portal.nersc.gov/project/dessn/autoscan.