sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Wilk, Kevin

Normalized to: Wilk, K.

4 article(s) in total. 2 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1906.01048  [pdf] - 2065169
Understanding nebular spectra of Type Ia supernovae
Comments: 19 pages, 14 figures, will be submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-06-03
In this study, we present one-dimensional, non-local-thermodynamic-equilibrium, radiative transfer simulations (using CMFGEN) in which we introduce micro-clumping at nebular times into two Type Ia supernova ejecta models. We use one sub-Chandrasekhar (sub-M$_{\rm Ch}$) ejecta with 1.02 M$_\odot$ and one M$_{\rm Ch}$ ejecta model with 1.40 M$_\odot$. We introduce clumping factors $f=$0.33,0.25, and 0.10 which are constant throughout the ejecta and compared to the unclumped $f=1.0$ case. We find that clumping is a natural mechanism to reduce the ionization of the ejecta, reducing emission from [Fe III], [Ar III], and [S III] by a factor of a few. For decreasing values of the clumping factor $f$, the [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda$7291,7324 doublet became a dominant cooling line for our M$_{\rm Ch}$ model but still weak in our sub-M$_{\rm Ch}$ model. Strong [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda$7291,7324 indicates non-thermal heating in that region and may constrain explosion modelling. Due to the low abundance of stable nickel, our sub-M$_{\rm Ch}$ model never showed the [Ni II] 1.939 micron diagnostic feature for all clumping values.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1905.05798  [pdf] - 1890523
Solving the gamma-ray radiative transfer equation for supernovae
Comments: 9 pages, 7 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-05-14
We present a new relativistic radiative-transfer code for $\gamma$-rays of energy less than 5 MeV in supernova (SN) ejecta. This code computes the opacities, the prompt emissivity (i.e. decay), and the scattering emissivity, and solves for the intensity in the co-moving frame. Because of the large expansion velocities of SN ejecta, we ignore redistribution effects associated with thermal motions. The energy deposition is calculated from the energy removed from the radiation field by scattering or photoelectric absorption. This new code yields comparable results to an independent Monte Carlo code. However, both yield non-trivial differences with the results from a pure absorption treatment of $\gamma$-ray transport. A synthetic observer's frame spectrum is also produced from the CMF intensity. At early times when the optical depth to $\gamma$-rays is large, the synthetic spectrum show asymmetric line profiles with redshifted absorption as seen in SN 2014J. This new code is integrated within CMFGEN and allows for an accurate and fast computation of the decay energy deposition in SN ejecta.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.08724  [pdf] - 1779621
Impact of clumping on core-collapse supernova radiation
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A on 7 Aug. 2018
Submitted: 2018-08-27
There is both observational and theoretical evidence that the ejecta of core-collapse supernovae (SNe) are structured. Rather than being smooth and homogeneous, the material is made of over-dense and under-dense regions of distinct composition. Here, we explore the effect of clumping on the SN radiation during the photospheric phase using 1-D non-local thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer and an ejecta model arising from a blue-supergiant explosion (yielding a Type II-peculiar SN). Neglecting chemical segregation, we adopt a velocity-dependent volume-filling factor approach that assumes that the clumps are small but does not change the column density along any sightline. We find that clumping boosts the recombination rate in the photospheric layers, leading to a faster recession of the photosphere, an increase in bolometric luminosity, and a reddening of the SN colors through enhanced blanketing. The SN bolometric light curve peaks earlier and transitions faster to the nebular phase. On the rise to maximum, the strongest luminosity contrast between our clumped and smooth models is obtained at the epoch when the photosphere has receded to ejecta layers where the clumping factor is only 0.5 -- this clumping factor may be larger in Nature. Clumping is seen to have a similar influence in a Type II-Plateau SN model. As we neglect both porosity and chemical segregation our models underestimate the true impact of clumping. These results warrant further study of the influence of clumping on the observables of other SN types during the photospheric phase.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.00105  [pdf] - 1608559
Ejecta Mass Diagnostics of Type Ia Supernovae
Comments: 25 pages, 24 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-10-31
We present one-dimensional non-local thermodynamic equilibrium time-dependent radiative transfer simulations (using CMFGEN) of two sub-Chandrasekhar (sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$), one $M_{\rm Ch}$ and one super-$M_{\rm Ch}$ Type Ia SN ejecta models. Three originate from $M_{\rm Ch}$ delayed detonation models, and the fourth is a sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ detonation model. Ejecta masses are 1.02, 1.04, 1.40, and 1.70 M$_\odot$, and all models have 0.62 M$_\odot$ of $^{56}{\rm Ni}$. Sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ model light curves evolve faster, reaching bolometric maximum 2--3 days earlier and having 3--4 days shorter bolometric half light widths. The models vary by $\sim$12 per cent at maximum bolometric luminosity and by 0.17 mag in $B_{\rm max}$. While $\Delta M_{15}(B)$ increases with ejecta mass it only varies by $\sim$5 per cent around 1 mag. Sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ models are 0.25 mag bluer in $B-R$ at $B_{\rm max}$. Optical spectra share many similarities, but lower mass models exhibit less UV line blanketing during the photospheric phase. At nebular times, significant NIR spectroscopic differences are seen. In particular, emission lines of the Ca II NIR triplet; [S III] $\lambda\lambda$9068,9530; [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda$7291,7324; [Ar III] $\lambda\lambda$7135,7751; and [Ni II] 1.939 $\mu$m are stronger in higher mass models. The [Ni II] 1.939 $\mu$m line is absent in the sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ detonation model, and provides a valuable potential tool to distinguish sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ explosions from $M_{\rm Ch}$ explosions. In general, the nebular phase models are too highly ionized. We attribute this to the neglect of clumping and/or the distribution of intermediate mass and iron group elements. The two sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ models, while exploded by different mechanisms, can be distinguished in the $J$ and $H$ bands at late times (e.g., $+200$ days).