Normalized to: Wilk, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01048 [pdf] - 2065169
Understanding nebular spectra of Type Ia supernovae
Submitted: 2019-06-03
In this study, we present one-dimensional,
non-local-thermodynamic-equilibrium, radiative transfer simulations (using
CMFGEN) in which we introduce micro-clumping at nebular times into two Type Ia
supernova ejecta models. We use one sub-Chandrasekhar (sub-M$_{\rm Ch}$) ejecta
with 1.02 M$_\odot$ and one M$_{\rm Ch}$ ejecta model with 1.40 M$_\odot$. We
introduce clumping factors $f=$0.33,0.25, and 0.10 which are constant
throughout the ejecta and compared to the unclumped $f=1.0$ case. We find that
clumping is a natural mechanism to reduce the ionization of the ejecta,
reducing emission from [Fe III], [Ar III], and [S III] by a factor of a few.
For decreasing values of the clumping factor $f$, the [Ca II]
$\lambda\lambda$7291,7324 doublet became a dominant cooling line for our
M$_{\rm Ch}$ model but still weak in our sub-M$_{\rm Ch}$ model. Strong [Ca II]
$\lambda\lambda$7291,7324 indicates non-thermal heating in that region and may
constrain explosion modelling. Due to the low abundance of stable nickel, our
sub-M$_{\rm Ch}$ model never showed the [Ni II] 1.939 micron diagnostic feature
for all clumping values.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.05798 [pdf] - 1890523
Solving the gamma-ray radiative transfer equation for supernovae
Submitted: 2019-05-14
We present a new relativistic radiative-transfer code for $\gamma$-rays of
energy less than 5 MeV in supernova (SN) ejecta. This code computes the
opacities, the prompt emissivity (i.e. decay), and the scattering emissivity,
and solves for the intensity in the co-moving frame. Because of the large
expansion velocities of SN ejecta, we ignore redistribution effects associated
with thermal motions. The energy deposition is calculated from the energy
removed from the radiation field by scattering or photoelectric absorption.
This new code yields comparable results to an independent Monte Carlo code.
However, both yield non-trivial differences with the results from a pure
absorption treatment of $\gamma$-ray transport. A synthetic observer's frame
spectrum is also produced from the CMF intensity. At early times when the
optical depth to $\gamma$-rays is large, the synthetic spectrum show asymmetric
line profiles with redshifted absorption as seen in SN 2014J. This new code is
integrated within CMFGEN and allows for an accurate and fast computation of the
decay energy deposition in SN ejecta.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.08724 [pdf] - 1779621
Impact of clumping on core-collapse supernova radiation
Submitted: 2018-08-27
There is both observational and theoretical evidence that the ejecta of
core-collapse supernovae (SNe) are structured. Rather than being smooth and
homogeneous, the material is made of over-dense and under-dense regions of
distinct composition. Here, we explore the effect of clumping on the SN
radiation during the photospheric phase using 1-D non-local thermodynamic
equilibrium radiative transfer and an ejecta model arising from a
blue-supergiant explosion (yielding a Type II-peculiar SN). Neglecting chemical
segregation, we adopt a velocity-dependent volume-filling factor approach that
assumes that the clumps are small but does not change the column density along
any sightline. We find that clumping boosts the recombination rate in the
photospheric layers, leading to a faster recession of the photosphere, an
increase in bolometric luminosity, and a reddening of the SN colors through
enhanced blanketing. The SN bolometric light curve peaks earlier and
transitions faster to the nebular phase. On the rise to maximum, the strongest
luminosity contrast between our clumped and smooth models is obtained at the
epoch when the photosphere has receded to ejecta layers where the clumping
factor is only 0.5 -- this clumping factor may be larger in Nature. Clumping is
seen to have a similar influence in a Type II-Plateau SN model. As we neglect
both porosity and chemical segregation our models underestimate the true impact
of clumping. These results warrant further study of the influence of clumping
on the observables of other SN types during the photospheric phase.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.00105 [pdf] - 1608559
Ejecta Mass Diagnostics of Type Ia Supernovae
Submitted: 2017-10-31
We present one-dimensional non-local thermodynamic equilibrium time-dependent
radiative transfer simulations (using CMFGEN) of two sub-Chandrasekhar
(sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$), one $M_{\rm Ch}$ and one super-$M_{\rm Ch}$ Type Ia SN
ejecta models. Three originate from $M_{\rm Ch}$ delayed detonation models, and
the fourth is a sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ detonation model. Ejecta masses are 1.02,
1.04, 1.40, and 1.70 M$_\odot$, and all models have 0.62 M$_\odot$ of
$^{56}{\rm Ni}$. Sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ model light curves evolve faster, reaching
bolometric maximum 2--3 days earlier and having 3--4 days shorter bolometric
half light widths. The models vary by $\sim$12 per cent at maximum bolometric
luminosity and by 0.17 mag in $B_{\rm max}$. While $\Delta M_{15}(B)$ increases
with ejecta mass it only varies by $\sim$5 per cent around 1 mag. Sub-$M_{\rm
Ch}$ models are 0.25 mag bluer in $B-R$ at $B_{\rm max}$. Optical spectra share
many similarities, but lower mass models exhibit less UV line blanketing during
the photospheric phase. At nebular times, significant NIR spectroscopic
differences are seen. In particular, emission lines of the Ca II NIR triplet;
[S III] $\lambda\lambda$9068,9530; [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda$7291,7324; [Ar III]
$\lambda\lambda$7135,7751; and [Ni II] 1.939 $\mu$m are stronger in higher mass
models. The [Ni II] 1.939 $\mu$m line is absent in the sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$
detonation model, and provides a valuable potential tool to distinguish
sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ explosions from $M_{\rm Ch}$ explosions. In general, the
nebular phase models are too highly ionized. We attribute this to the neglect
of clumping and/or the distribution of intermediate mass and iron group
elements. The two sub-$M_{\rm Ch}$ models, while exploded by different
mechanisms, can be distinguished in the $J$ and $H$ bands at late times (e.g.,
$+200$ days).