One of the least understood processes in astrophysics is the formation of planetesimals from molecules and dust within protoplanetary disks. In fact, current methods have strong limitations when it comes to model the full dynamics in this phase of planet formation, where small dust aggregates collide and grow into bigger clusters. That is why microgravity experiments of the phenomena involved are important to reveal the underlying physics. Because previous experiments had some limitations, in particular short durations and constrained dimensions, a new mission to study the very first stages of planet formation is proposed here. This mission, called Magrathea, is focused on creating the best conditions for developing these experiments, using a satellite with a 6 $m^3$ test chamber. During the mission 28 experiments are performed using different dust compositions, sizes and shapes, to better understand under which conditions dust grains stick and aggregate. Each experiment should last up to one month, with relative collision velocities of up to 5 mm/s, and initial dust sizes between 1 $\mu$m and 1 mm. At least $10^6$ collisions per experiment should be recorded, to provide statistically significant results. Based on the scientific objectives and requirements, a preliminary analysis of the payload instrumentation is performed. From that a conceptual mission and spacecraft design is developed, together with a first approach to mission programmatic and risk analysis. The solution reached is a 1000 kg spacecraft, set on a 800 km Sun-synchronous orbit, with a total mission cost of around 438 MEuros.

Measurements of cosmological parameters via the distance-redshift relation usually rely on models that assume a homogenous universe. It is commonly presumed that the large-scale structure evident in our Universe has a negligible impact on the measurement if distances probed in observations are sufficiently large (compared to the scale of inhomogeneities) and are averaged over different directions on the sky. This presumption does not hold when considering the effect of the gravitational redshift caused by our local gravitational potential, which alters light coming from all distances and directions in the same way. Despite its small magnitude, this local gravitational redshift gives rise to noticeable effects in cosmological inference using SN Ia data. Assuming conservative prior knowledge of the local potential given by sampling a range of gravitational potentials at locations of Milky-Way-like galaxies identified in cosmological simulations, we show that ignoring the gravitational redshift effect in a standard data analysis leads to an additional systematic error of ~1 per cent in the determination of density parameters and the dark energy equation of state. We conclude that our local gravitational field affects our cosmological inference at a level that is important in future observations aiming to achieve percent-level accuracy.