Normalized to: Wiel, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.00896 [pdf] - 1527258
Rare Event Statistics Applied to Fast Radio Bursts
Submitted: 2016-12-02
Statistical interpretation of sparsely sampled event rates has become vital
for new transient surveys, particularly those aimed at detecting fast radio
bursts (FRBs). We provide an accessible reference for a number of simple, but
critical, statistical questions relevant for current transient and FRB research
and utilizing the negative binomial model for counts in which the count rate
parameter is uncertain or randomly biased from one study to the next. We apply
these methods to re-assess and update results from previous FRB surveys,
finding as follows. 1) Thirteen FRBs detected across five
high-Galactic-latitude (> 30$^\circ$) surveys are highly significant $(p =
5\times 10^{-5})$ evidence of a higher rate relative to the single FRB detected
across four low-latitude (< 5$^\circ$) surveys, even after accounting for
effects that dampen Galactic plane sensitivity. High- vs. mid-latitude (5 to
15$^\circ$) is marginally significant $(p = 0.03)$. 2) A meta analysis of
twelve heterogeneous surveys gives an FRB rate of 2866 sky$^{-1}$ day$^{-1}$
above 1 Jy at high Galactic latitude (95% confidence 1121 to 7328) and 285
sky$^{-1}$ day$^{-1}$ at low/mid latitudes (95% from 48 to 1701). 3) Using the
Parkes HTRU high-latitude setup requires 193 observing hours to achieve 50%
probability of detecting an FRB and 937 hours to achieve 95% probability, based
on the ten detections of (Champion et al. 2016) and appropriately accounting
for uncertainty in the unknown Poisson rate. 4) Two quick detections at Parkes
from a small number of high-latitude fields (Ravi et al. 2015; Petroff et al.
2015) tentatively favor a look long survey style relative to the scan wide HTRU
survey, but only at $p = 0.07$ significance.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.00458 [pdf] - 1580511
The Non-homogeneous Poisson Process for Fast Radio Burst Rates
Submitted: 2016-11-01
This paper presents the non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) for modeling
the rate of fast radio bursts (FRBs) and other infrequently observed
astronomical events. The NHPP, well-known in statistics, can model changes in
the rate as a function of both astronomical features and the details of an
observing campaign. This is particularly helpful for rare events like FRBs
because the NHPP can combine information across surveys, making the most of all
available information. The goal of the paper is two-fold. First, it is intended
to be a tutorial on the use of the NHPP. Second, we build an NHPP model that
incorporates beam patterns and a power law flux distribution for the rate of
FRBs. Using information from 12 surveys including 15 detections, we find an
all-sky FRB rate of 586.88 events per sky per day above a flux of 1 Jy (95\%
CI: 271.86, 923.72) and a flux power-law index of 0.91 (95\% CI: 0.57, 1.25).
Our rate is lower than other published rates, but consistent with the rate
given in Champion et al. 2016.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.1525 [pdf] - 1092783
Comparison of RFI Mitigation Strategies for Dispersed Pulse Detection
Submitted: 2012-01-06
Impulsive radio-frequency signals from astronomical sources are dispersed by
the frequency dependent index of refraction of the interstellar media and so
appear as chirped signals when they reach earth. Searches for dispersed
impulses have been limited by false detections due to radio frequency
interference (RFI) and, in some cases, artifacts of the instrumentation. Many
authors have discussed techniques to excise or mitigate RFI in searches for
fast transients, but comparisons between different approaches are lacking. This
work develops RFI mitigation techniques for use in searches for dispersed
pulses, employing data recorded in a "Fly's Eye" mode of the Allen Telescope
Array as a test case. We gauge the performance of several RFI mitigation
techniques by adding dispersed signals to data containing RFI and comparing
false alarm rates at the observed signal-to-noise ratios of the added signals.
We find that Huber filtering is most effective at removing broadband
interferers, while frequency centering is most effective at removing narrow
frequency interferers. Neither of these methods is effective over a broad range
of interferers. A method that combines Huber filtering and adaptive
interference cancellation provides the lowest number of false positives over
the interferers considered here. The methods developed here have application to
other searches for dispersed pulses in incoherent spectra, especially those
involving multiple beam systems.