sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Wibig, T.

Normalized to: Wibig, T.

20 article(s) in total. 479 co-authors, from 1 to 8 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 4,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.01929  [pdf] - 1974460
Recognition and classification of the cosmic-ray events in images captured by CMOS/CCD cameras
Comments: 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2019)
Submitted: 2019-09-04, last modified: 2019-10-07
Muons and other ionizing radiation produced by cosmic rays and radiative decays affect CMOS/CCD sensor. When particles colliding with sensors atoms cause specific kind of noise on images recorded by cameras. We present a concept and preliminary implementation of method for recognizing those events and algorithms for image processing and their classification by machine learning. Our method consists of analyzing the shape of traces present in images recorded by a camera sensor and metadata related to an image like camera model, GPS location of camera, vertical and horizontal orientation of a camera sensor, timestamp of image acquisition, and other events recognized near-by sensors. The so created feature vectors are classified as either a muon-like event, an electron-like event or the other event, possibly noise. For muon-like events our method estimates azimuth of a muon track. Source of the data is database of CREDO (Cosmic-Ray Extremely Distributed Observatory) project and ESO (European Southern Observatory) archives. The telescope dark frames from ESO are analysed. CREDO project collected so far over 2 millions images of events from many kinds of cameralike: smartphones camera, laptop webcams and Internet of Things cameras localised around the globe.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.08805  [pdf] - 1948860
Search for ultra-high energy photons: observing the preshower effect with gamma-ray telescopes
Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures, International Cosmic Ray Conference 2019
Submitted: 2019-08-23, last modified: 2019-08-26
Ultra-high energy photons constitute one of the most important pieces of the astroparticle physics problems. Their observation may provide new insight on several phenomena such as supermassive particle annihilation or the GZK effect. Because of the absence of any significant photon identification by a leading experiments such as the Pierre Auger Observatory, we consider a screening phenomenon called preshower effect which could efficiently affect ultra-high energy photon propagation. This effect is a consequence of photon interactions with the geomagnetic field and results in large electromagnetic cascade of particles several thousands kilometers above the atmosphere. This collection of particles, called cosmic-ray ensembles (CRE), may reach the atmosphere and produce the well-known air showers. In this paper we propose to use gamma-ray telescopes to look for air showers induced by CRE. Possible sources of ultra-high energy photons include the GZK effect and Super Heavy Dark Matter particles. Simulations involving the preshower effect and detectors response are performed and properties of these peculiar air showers are investigated. The use of boosted decision trees to obtain the best cosmic-ray ensemble/hadron separation, the aperture and event rate predictions for a few models of photon production are also presented.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.09734  [pdf] - 1948935
Public engagement as a scientific tool to implement multi-messenger strategies with the Cosmic-Ray Extremely Distributed Observatory
Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures, Proceedings The New Era of Multi-Messenger Astrophysics - Asterics2019, 25 - 29 March, 2019 Groningen, The Netherlands
Submitted: 2019-08-26
The Cosmic-Ray Extremely Distributed Observatory (CREDO) uses the hunt for particle cascades from deep space as a vehicle for a unique "bottom-up" approach to scientific research. By engaging the non-specialist public of all ages as "citizen scientists" we create opportunities for lifelong learning for individuals as well as for cooperation and the sharing of common educational tools amongst institutions. The discoveries of these citizen scientists will feed directly into a pioneering new area of scientific research oriented on Cosmic Ray Ensembles (CRE). The detection (or non-detection) of such particle groups promises to open up a new method for exploring our universe, and a new channel on the multi-messenger stage, oriented on both astro- and geo-investigations. The opportunities this would create for cross-disciplinary research are significant and beneficial for individuals, networks of institutions and the global communities of both professional scientists and science enthusiasts.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.10334  [pdf] - 1905637
Cosmic ray ensembles as signatures of ultra-high energy photons interacting with the solar magnetic field
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-11-26, last modified: 2019-06-25
Propagation of ultra-high energy photons in the solar magnetosphere gives rise to cascades comprising thousands of photons. We study the cascade development using Monte Carlo simulations and find that the photons in the cascades are spatially extended over hundreds of kilometers as they arrive at the top of the Earth's atmosphere. We compare results from simulations which use two models of the solar magnetic field, and show that although signatures of such cascades are different for the models used, for practical detection purpose in the ground-based detectors, they are similar.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.05230  [pdf] - 1643587
Cosmic-Ray Extremely Distributed Observatory: a global cosmic ray detection framework
Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1709.05196
Submitted: 2017-09-15, last modified: 2018-01-12
The main objective of the Cosmic-Ray Extremely Distributed Observatory (CREDO) is the detection and analysis of extended cosmic ray phenomena, so-called super-preshowers (SPS), using existing as well as new infrastructure (cosmic-ray observatories, educational detectors, single detectors etc.). The search for ensembles of cosmic ray events initiated by SPS is yet an untouched ground, in contrast to the current state-of-the-art analysis, which is focused on the detection of single cosmic ray events. Theoretical explanation of SPS could be given either within classical (e.g., photon-photon interaction) or exotic (e.g., Super Heavy Dark Matter decay or annihilation) scenarios, thus detection of SPS would provide a better understanding of particle physics, high energy astrophysics and cosmology. The ensembles of cosmic rays can be classified based on the spatial and temporal extent of particles constituting the ensemble. Some classes of SPS are predicted to have huge spatial distribution, a unique signature detectable only with a facility of the global size. Since development and commissioning of a completely new facility with such requirements is economically unwarranted and time-consuming, the global analysis goals are achievable when all types of existing detectors are merged into a worldwide network. The idea to use the instruments in operation is based on a novel trigger algorithm: in parallel to looking for neighbour surface detectors receiving the signal simultaneously, one should also look for spatially isolated stations clustered in a small time window.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1706.05872  [pdf] - 1584857
Universal cosmic rays energy spectrum and the mass composition at the 'ankle' and above
Comments:
Submitted: 2017-06-19
We have used recently published data from the Pierre Auger Observatory and the Telescope Array Project to conclude some inferences concerning the origin and composition of ultra high-energy cosmic rays (UHECR). We advocate for model the UHECR flux as a combination of the Galactic and Extragalactic components exchanging the dominant role at the famous feature of the energy spectrum called 'the ankle'. We put a special emphasis on the individual experiment energy resolution and possible biases it introduces. We have eventually combined the data from both big experiments to the one 'world average' UHECR spectrum and we used it, supported by the analysis of the distribution of the Extensive Air Shower (EAS) development maximum depth to find the UHECR mass composition of both: Galactic and Extragalactic components. We studied the dependence of the on mass composition on the cosmic ray source distribution in space. We present results for some models existing in the literature. We found the evidence of the deficit of Extragalactic sources in the vicinity of the Galaxy of the the UHECR, what is in concordance with the small scale anisotropy analysis results.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1507.06773  [pdf] - 1251987
Cosmic Ray contribution to the WMAP polarization data on the Cosmic Microwave Background
Comments:
Submitted: 2015-07-24
We have updated our analysis of the 9-year WMAP data using the collection of polarization maps looking for the presence of additional evidence for a finite 'cosmic ray foreground' for the CMB. We have given special attention to high Galactic latitudes, where the recent BICEP2 findings were reported. The method of examining the correlation with the observed gamma ray flux proposed in our earlier papers and applied to the polarization data shows that the foreground related to cosmic rays is still observed even at high Galactic altitudes and conclusions about gravitational waves are not yet secure. Theory has it that there is important information about inflationary gravitational waves in the fine structure of the CMB polarization properties (polarization vector and angle) and it is necessary to examine further the conclusions that can be gained from studies of the CMB maps, in view of the disturbing foreground effects.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.2478  [pdf] - 662659
An evaluation of the exposure in nadir observation of the JEM-EUSO mission
Adams, J. H.; Ahmad, S.; Albert, J. -N.; Allard, D.; Ambrosio, M.; Anchordoqui, L.; Anzalone, A.; Arai, Y.; Aramo, C.; Asano, K.; Ave, M.; Barrillon, P.; Batsch, T.; Bayer, J.; Belenguer, T.; Bellotti, R.; Berlind, A. A.; Bertaina, M.; Biermann, P. L.; Biktemerova, S.; Blaksley, C.; Blecki, J.; Blin-Bondil, S.; Bluemer, J.; Bobik, P.; Bogomilov, M.; Bonamente, M.; Briggs, M. S.; Briz, S.; Bruno, A.; Cafagna, F.; Campana, D.; Capdevielle, J-N.; Caruso, R.; Casolino, M.; Cassardo, C.; Castellini, G.; Catalano, O.; Cellino, A.; Chikawa, M.; Christl, M. J.; Connaughton, V.; Cortes, J. F.; Crawford, H. J.; Cremonini, R.; Csorna, S.; D'Olivo, J. C.; Dagoret-Campagne, S.; de Castro, A. J.; De Donato, C.; de la Taille, C.; del Peral, L.; Dell'Oro, A.; De Pascale, M. P.; Di Martino, M.; Distratis, G.; Dupieux, M.; Ebersoldt, A.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Engel, R.; Falk, S.; Fang, K.; Fenu, F.; Fernandez-Gomez, I.; Ferrarese, S.; Franceschi, A.; Fujimoto, J.; Galeotti, P.; Garipov, G.; Geary, J.; Giaccari, U. G.; Giraudo, G.; Gonchar, M.; Alvarado, C. Gonzalez; Gorodetzky, P.; Guarino, F.; Guzman, A.; Hachisu, Y.; Harlov, B.; Haungs, A.; Carretero, J. Hernandez; Higashide, K.; Iguchi, T.; Ikeda, H.; Inoue, N.; Inoue, S.; Insolia, A.; Isgrio, F.; Itow, Y.; Joven, E.; Judd, E. G.; Jung, A.; Kajino, F.; Kajino, T.; Kaneko, I.; Karadzhov, Y.; Karczmarczyk, J.; Katahira, K.; Kawai, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Keilhauer, B.; Khrenov, B. A.; Kim, Jeong-Sook; Kim, Soon-Wook; Kim, Sug-Whan; Kleifges, M.; Klimov, P. A.; Ko, S. H.; Kolev, D.; Kreykenbohm, I.; Kudela, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Kuznetsov, E.; La Rosa, G.; Lee, J.; Licandro, J.; Lim, H.; Lopez, F.; Maccarone, M. C.; Mannheim, K.; Marcelli, L.; Marini, A.; Martin-Chassard, G.; Martinez, O.; Masciantonio, G.; Mase, K.; Matev, R.; Maurissen, A.; Medina-Tanco, G.; Mernik, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Mizumoto, Y.; Modestino, G.; Monnier-Ragaigne, D.; Rios, J. A. Morales de los; Mot, B.; Murakami, T.; Nagano, M.; Nagata, M.; Nagataki, S.; Nakamura, T.; Nam, J. W.; Nam, S.; Nam, K.; Napolitano, T.; Naumov, D.; Neronov, A.; Nomoto, K.; Ogawa, T.; Ohmori, H.; Olinto, A. V.; Orleanski, P.; Osteria, G.; Pacheco, N.; Panasyuk, M. I.; Parizot, E.; Park, I. H.; Pastircak, B.; Patzak, T.; Paul, T.; Pennypacker, C.; Peter, T.; Picozza, P.; Pollini, A.; Prieto, H.; Reardon, P.; Reina, M.; Reyes, M.; Ricci, M.; Rodriguez, I.; Frias, M. D. Rodriguez; Ronga, F.; Rothkaehl, H.; Roudil, G.; Rusinov, I.; Rybczynski, M.; Sabau, M. D.; Cano, G. Saez; Saito, A.; Sakaki, N.; Sakata, M.; Salazar, H.; Sanchez, S.; Santangelo, A.; Cruz, L. Santiago; Palomino, M. Sanz; Saprykin, O.; Sarazin, F.; Sato, H.; Sato, M.; Schanz, T.; Schieler, H.; Scotti, V.; Scuderi, M.; Segreto, A.; Selmane, S.; Semikoz, D.; Serra, M.; Sharakin, S.; Shibata, T.; Shimizu, H. M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shirahama, T.; Siemieniec-Ozieb, G.; Lopez, H. H. Silva; Sledd, J.; Slominska, K.; Sobey, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Supanitsky, D.; Suzuki, M.; Szabelska, B.; Szabelski, J.; Tajima, F.; Tajima, N.; Tajima, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Takami, H.; Takeda, M.; Takizawa, Y.; Tenzer, C.; Tibolla, O.; Tkachev, L.; Tomida, T.; Tone, N.; Trillaud, F.; Tsenov, R.; Tsuno, K.; Tymieniecka, T.; Uchihori, Y.; Vaduvescu, O.; Valdes-Galicia, J. F.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vankova, G.; Vigorito, C.; Villasenor, L.; von Ballmoos, P.; Wada, S.; Watanabe, J.; Watanabe, S.; Watts, J.; Weber, M.; Weiler, T. J.; Wibig, T.; Wiencke, L.; Wille, M.; Wilms, J.; Wlodarczyk, Z.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yang, J.; Yano, H.; Yashin, I. V.; Yonetoku, D.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, S.; Young, R.; Zamora, A.; Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Comments: published in Astroparticle Physics by the JEM-EUSO Collaboration
Submitted: 2013-05-11
We evaluate the exposure during nadir observations with JEM-EUSO, the Extreme Universe Space Observatory, on-board the Japanese Experiment Module of the International Space Station. Designed as a mission to explore the extreme energy Universe from space, JEM-EUSO will monitor the Earth's nighttime atmosphere to record the ultraviolet light from tracks generated by extensive air showers initiated by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In the present work, we discuss the particularities of space-based observation and we compute the annual exposure in nadir observation. The results are based on studies of the expected trigger aperture and observational duty cycle, as well as, on the investigations of the effects of clouds and different types of background light. We show that the annual exposure is about one order of magnitude higher than those of the presently operating ground-based observatories.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1204.5065  [pdf] - 554284
The JEM-EUSO Mission: Status and Prospects in 2011
Collaboration, The JEM-EUSO; :; Adams, J. H.; Ahmad, S.; Albert, J. -N.; Allard, D.; Ambrosio, M.; Anchordoqui, L.; Anzalone, A.; Arai, Y.; Aramo, C.; Asano, K.; Barrillon, P.; Batsch, T.; Bayer, J.; Belenguer, T.; Bellotti, R.; Berlind, A. A.; Bertaina, M.; Biermann, P. L.; Biktemerova, S.; Blaksley, C.; Blecki, J.; Blin-Bondil, S.; Bluemer, J.; Bobik, P.; Bogomilov, M.; Bonamente, M.; Briggs, M. S.; Briz, S.; Bruno, A.; Cafagna, F.; Campana, D.; Capdevielle, J-N.; Caruso, R.; Casolino, M.; Cassardo, C.; Castellini, G.; Catalano, O.; Cellino, A.; Chikawa, M.; Christl, M. J.; Connaughton, V.; Cortes, J. F.; Crawford, H. J.; Cremonini, R.; Csorna, S.; D'Olivo, J. C.; Dagoret-Campagne, S.; de Castro, A. J.; De Donato, C.; de la Taille, C.; De Pascale, M. P.; del Peral, L.; Dell'Oro, A.; Di Martino, M.; Distrati, G.; Dupieux, M.; Ebersoldt, A.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Engel, R.; Falk, S.; Fang, K.; Fenu, F.; Ferrarese, S.; Fernandez-Gomez, I.; Franceschi, A.; Fujimoto, J.; Galeotti, P.; Garipov, G.; Geary, J.; Giaccari, U. G.; Giraudo, G.; Gonchar, M.; Alvarado, C. Gonzalez; Gorodetzky, P.; Guarino, F.; Guzman, A.; Hachisu, Y.; Harlov, B.; Haungs, A.; Carretero, J. Hernandez; Higashide, K.; Iguchi, T.; Ikeda, H.; Inoue, N.; Inoue, S.; Insolia, A.; Isgro, F.; Itow, Y.; Joven, E.; Judd, E. G.; Jung, A.; Kajino, F.; Kajino, T.; Kaneko, I.; Karadzhov, Y.; Karczmarczyk, J.; Katahira, K.; Kawai, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Keilhauer, B.; Khrenov, B. A.; Kim, Jeong-Sook; Kim, Soon-Wook; Kim, Sug-Whan; Kleifges, M.; Klimov, P. A.; Ko, S. H.; Kolev, D.; Kreykenbohm, I.; Kudela, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Kuznetsov, E.; La Rosa, G.; Lee, J.; Licandro, J.; Lim, H.; Lopez, F.; Maccarone, M. C.; Marcelli, L.; Marini, A.; Martin-Chassard, G.; Martinez, O.; Masciantonio, G.; Mase, K.; Matev, R.; Maurissen, A.; Medina-Tanco, G.; Mernik, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Mizumoto, Y.; Modestino, G.; Monnier-Ragaigne, D.; Rıos, J. A. Morales de los; Mot, B.; Murakami, T.; Nagano, M.; Nagata, M.; Nagataki, S.; Nam, J. W.; Nam, S.; Nam, K.; Napolitano, T.; Naumov, D.; Neronov, A.; Nomoto, K.; Ogawa, T.; Ohmori, H.; Olinto, A. V.; Orleanski, P.; Osteria, G.; Pacheco, N.; Panasyuk, M. I.; Parizot, E.; Park, I. H.; Pastircak, B.; Patzak, T.; Paul, T.; Pennypacker, C.; Peter, T.; Picozza, P.; Pollini, A.; Prieto, H.; Reardon, P.; Reina, M.; Reyes, M.; Ricci, M.; Rodrıguez, I.; Frıas, M. D. Rodrıguez; Ronga, F.; Rothkaehl, H.; Roudil, G.; Rusinov, I.; Rybczynski, M.; Sabau, M. D.; Cano, G. Saez; Saito, A.; Sakaki, N.; Sakata, M.; Salazar, H.; Sanchez, S.; Santangelo, A.; Cruz, L. Santiago; Palomino, M. Sanz; Saprykin, O.; Sarazin, F.; Sato, H.; Sato, M.; Schanz, T.; Schieler, H.; Scotti, V.; Scuderi, M.; Segreto, A.; Selmane, S.; Semikoz, D.; Serra, M.; Sharakin, S.; Shibata, T.; Shimizu, H. M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shirahama, T.; Siemieniec-Ozieblo, G.; Lopez, H. H. Silva; Sledd, J.; Slominska, K.; Sobey, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Supanitsky, D.; Suzuki, M.; Szabelska, B.; Szabelski, J.; Tajima, F.; Tajima, N.; Tajima, T.; Takami, H.; Nakamura, T.; Takeda, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Takizawa, Y.; Tenzer, C.; Tkachev, L.; Tomida, T.; Tone, N.; Trillaud, F.; Tsenov, R.; Tsuno, K.; Tymieniecka, T.; Uchihori, Y.; Vaduvescu, O.; Valdes-Galicia, J. F.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vankova, G.; Vigorito, C.; Villasenor, L.; von Ballmoos, P.; Wada, S.; Watanabe, J.; Watanabe, S.; Watts, J.; Weber, M.; Weiler, T. J.; Wibig, T.; Wiencke, L.; Wille, M.; Wilms, J.; Wlodarczyk, Z.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yang, J.; Yano, H.; Yashin, I. V.; Yonetoku, D.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, S.; Young, R.; Zamora, A.; Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Comments: 33 contributions plus index
Submitted: 2012-04-23
Contributions of the JEM-EUSO Collaboration to the 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing, August, 2011.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1012.4562  [pdf] - 1042692
The knee in the cosmic ray energy spectrum: a pulsar/supernova origin?
Comments:
Submitted: 2010-12-21
The origin of the prominent 'knee' in the cosmic ray energy spectrum at an energy of several PeV is still uncertain. A recent mechanism has shown promise, however; this involves particles from a very young pulsar interacting with the radiation field from a very young supernova remnant. The ensuing nuclear reaction of the particles with the photons by way of e+e- production then causes the characteristic knee. In an earlier paper we argued that the mechanism would imply only one source of a very rare type - if it were to explain the spectral shape. Here we examine the mechanism in more detail and conclude that for even a single source to work its characteristics would need to be so unusual that the mechanism would not be possible for any known type of pulsar-supernova combination.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1009.0600  [pdf] - 1034674
Young Supernova Remnants and the Knee in the Cosmic Ray Sectrum
Comments:
Submitted: 2010-09-03
It has recently been suggested that neutron stars inside the shells of young supernova remnants (SNR) are the sources of PeV cosmic rays and that the interaction of the particles with the radiation field in the SNR causes electron pair production, which has relevance to recent observations of 'high' positron fluxes. Furthermore, the character of the interaction is such that the well-known knee in the cosmic ray energy spectrum can be explained. Our examination of the mechanism leads us to believe that the required parameters of SN and pulses are so uncommon that the knee and positron fraction can only be explained if a single, local and recent SN - and associated pulsar - are concerned.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:0712.3403  [pdf] - 8355
Heavy Cosmic Ray Nuclei from Extragalactic Sources above 'The Ankle'
Comments: 10 pages
Submitted: 2007-12-20
A very recent observation by the Auger Observatory group claims strong evidence for cosmic rays above 56 EeV being protons from Active Galactic Nuclei. If, as would be expected, the particles above the ankle at about 2 EeV are almost all of extragalactic origin then it follows that the characteristics of the nuclear interactions of such particles would need to be very different from conventional expectation -- a result that follows from the measured positions of 'shower maximum' in the Auger' work. Our own analysis gives a different result, viz that the detected particles are still 'massive' specifically with a mean value of <ln A> = 2.2 +- 0.8. The need for a dramatic change in the nuclear physics disappears.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:0709.3763  [pdf] - 1934175
The MAGIC Project: Contributions to ICRC 2007
Albert, J.; Aliu, E.; Anderhub, H.; Antoranz, P.; Armada, A.; Baixeras, C.; Barrio, J. A.; Bartko, H.; Bastieri, D.; Becker, J. K.; Bednarek, W.; Berger, K.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bock, R. K.; Bordas, P.; Bosch-Ramon, V.; Bretz, T.; Britvitch, I.; Cabras, G.; Camara, M.; Carmona, E.; Chilingarian, A.; Coarasa, J. A.; Commichau, S.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Costado, M. T.; Curtef, V.; Danielyan, V.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; Delgado, C.; Reyes, R. de los; De Lotto, B.; De Maria, M.; De Sabata, F.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Errando, M.; Fagiolini, M.; Ferenc, D.; Fernández, E.; Firpo, R.; Flix, J.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fuchs, M.; Galante, N.; García-López, R. J.; Garczarczyk, M.; Gaug, M.; Giller, M.; Goebel, F.; Hakobyan, D.; Hayashida, M.; Hengstebeck, T.; Herrero, A.; Höhne, D.; Hose, J.; Hsu, C. C.; Jacon, P.; Jogler, T.; Kosyra, R.; Kranich, D.; Kritzer, R.; Laille, A.; Lindfors, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; López, J.; López, M.; Lorenz, E.; Majumdar, P.; Maneva, G.; Mannheim, K.; Mansutti, O.; Mariotti, M.; Martínez, M.; Mazin, D.; Merck, C.; Meucci, M.; Meyer, M.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mizobuchi, S.; Moralejo, A.; Nieto, D.; Nilsson, K.; Ninkovic, J.; na-Wilhelmi, E. O; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Paneque, D.; Paoletti, R.; Paredes, J. M.; Pasanen, M.; Pascoli, D.; Pauss, F.; Pegna, R.; Persic, M.; Peruzzo, L.; Piccioli, A.; Prandini, E.; Puchades, N.; Raymers, A.; Rhode, W.; Ribó, M.; Rico, J.; Rissi, M.; Robert, A.; Rügamer, S.; Saggion, A.; Saito, T. Y.; Sánchez, A.; Sartori, P.; Scalzotto, V.; Scapin, V.; Schmitt, R.; Schweizer, T.; Shayduk, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shore, S. N.; Sidro, N.; Sillanpää, A.; Sobczynska, D.; Spanier, F.; Stamerra, A.; Stark, L. S.; Takalo, L.; Temnikov, P.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Torres, D. F.; Turini, N.; Vankov, H.; Venturini, A.; Vitale, V.; Wagner, R. M.; Wibig, T.; Wittek, W.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Zapatero, J.; .
Comments: HTML file with clickable links to papers
Submitted: 2007-09-24, last modified: 2007-12-10
The MAGIC Project: Contributions to ICRC 2007, Merida, Mexico. Contents pages for the Contribution on behalf of the MAGIC Collaboration to the 30th ICRC that took place in July 2007 in Merida, Mexico. The contents are in html form with clickable links to the papers that exist on the Astrophysics archive. We hope that this will make it easier to access the output of the conference in a systematic way. Comments on how useful this is/ how it could be improved should be sent to michela.demaria@iuav.it.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0702153  [pdf] - 89207
Comment on the "Second dip as a signature of ultrahigh energy proton interactions with cosmic microwave background radiation" by V.Berezinsky, A.Gazizov and K.Kachelriess
Comments: 4 pages
Submitted: 2007-02-06
A new feature in the spectrum of ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) has been announced in the paper by Berezinsky, Gazizov and Kachelriess. The ratio of the solution of the exact transport equation to its solution in the continuous energy loss limit shows intriguing features which, according to the Authors, are related to the very nature of the energy loss processes of UHECR:the very sharp second dip predicted at 6.3x10^19 eV can be used as an energy calibration point and also as the UHECR mass indicator for big future cosmic ray experiments. In the present paper we would like to advocate that this statement is an overinterpretation. The second dip is a result of an inapproriate approximation used, and thus it can't help to understand the nature of UHECR in any way.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0602231  [pdf] - 79807
Flux upper limit of gamma-ray emission by GRB050713a from MAGIC Telescope observations
Albert, J.; Aliu, E.; Anderhub, H.; Antoranz, P.; Armada, A.; Asensio, M.; Baixeras, C.; Barrio, J. A.; Bartelt, M.; Bartko, H.; Bastieri, D.; Bavikadi, R.; Bednarek, W.; Berger, K.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bisesi, E.; Bock, R. K.; Bretz, T.; Britvitch, I.; Camara, M.; Chilingarian, A.; Ciprini, S.; Coarasa, J. A.; Commichau, S.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Curtef, V.; Danielyan, V.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; Reyes, R. de los; De Lotto, B.; Domingo-Santamaria, E.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Errando, M.; Fagiolini, M.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez, E.; Firpo, R.; Flix, J.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Galante, N.; Garczarczyk, M.; Gaug, M.; Giller, M.; Goebel, F.; Hakobyan, D.; Hayashida, M.; Hengstebeck, T.; Hohne, D.; Hose, J.; Jacon, P.; Kalekin, O.; Kranich, D.; Laille, A.; Lenisa, T.; Liebing, P.; Lindfors, E.; Longo, F.; Lopez, J.; Lopez, M.; Lorenz, E.; Lucarelli, F.; Majumdar, P.; Maneva, G.; Mannheim, K.; Mariotti, M.; Martinez, M.; Mase, K.; Mazin, D.; Meucci, M.; Meyer, M.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mizobuchi, S.; Moralejo, A.; Nilsson, K.; Ona-Wilhelmi, E.; Orduna, R.; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Paneque, D.; Paoletti, R.; Pasanen, M.; Pascoli, D.; Pauss, F.; Pavel, N.; Pegna, R.; Persic, M.; Peruzzo, L.; Piccioli, A.; Prandini, E.; Rico, J.; Rhode, W.; Riegel, B.; Rissi, M.; Robert, A.; Rugamer, S.; Saggion, A.; Sanchez, A.; Sartori, P.; Scalzotto, V.; Schmitt, R.; Schweizer, T.; Shayduk, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shore, S.; Sidro, N.; Sillanpaa, A.; Sobczynska, D.; Stamerra, A.; Stark, L. S.; Takalo, L.; Temnikov, P.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Tonello, N.; Torres, A.; Torres, D. F.; Turini, N.; Vankov, H.; Vardanyan, A.; Vitale, V.; Wagner, R. M.; Wibig, T.; Wittek, W.; Zapatero, J.
Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures, submitted to ApJ
Submitted: 2006-02-10
The long-duration GRB050713a was observed by the MAGIC Telescope, 40 seconds after the burst onset, and followed up for 37 minutes, until twilight. The observation, triggered by a SWIFT alert, covered energies above ~175 GeV. Using standard MAGIC analysis, no evidence for a gamma signal was found. As the redshift of the GRB was not measured directly, the flux upper limit, estimated by MAGIC, is still compatible with the assumption of an unbroken power-law spectrum extending from a few hundred keV to our energy range.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409397  [pdf] - 67478
Foreground contributions to the Cosmic Microwave Background
Comments: 15 pages
Submitted: 2004-09-16, last modified: 2005-06-21
A detailed search has been made for evidence of foreground contributions to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) WMAP, such foregrounds being related to our Galaxy. We find remarkable results. On the largest angular scales we find significant differences between the power in the fluctuations for positive and negative Galactic latitudes and between the four Galactic Quadrants. There are also differences between the power spectrum at latitudes within 10 deg of the Plane and at higher latitudes. The `slope' of the power spectrum has similar variations. In an effort to find the origin of these Galactic-style effects we have examined the evidence from Galactic gamma rays, specifically from the EGRET instrument. A correlation is found between gamma ray intensities and the CMB and other cosmic ray indicators. Most of the large scale Galactic asymmetries (eg north, south difference and Quadrant variations) have analogues in cosmic ray asymmetries and also in some other Galactic properties, such as the column density of gas. Thus, it is possible to hypothesise on direct cosmic ray-induced contributions, although it may be that cosmic rays are simply the indicators of Galactic `conditions' which are influencing the residual CMB fluctuations. Irrespective of the actual cause of the correlations we have endeavoured to extrapolate to the situation where the residual foreground is minimised. The effect on the usually-derived cosmological properties - universal matter content, ionization, the tensor contribution, tilt and curvature - is briefly examined.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0410624  [pdf] - 68473
At what particle energy do extragalactic cosmic rays start to predominate?
Comments:
Submitted: 2004-10-26
We have argued [J. Szabelski et al. (2002)] that the well-known `ankle' in the cosmic ray energy spectrum, at logE (eV) ~ 18.7-19.0, marks the transition from mainly Galactic sources at lower energies to mainly extragalactic above. Recently, however, there have been claims for lower transitional energies, specifically from logE (eV) ~ 17.0 [G. Thompson et al. (2004)] via 17.2-17.8 [V.S. Berezinsky et al. (2004)] to 18.0 [A.M. Hillas (2004)]. In our model the ankle arises naturally from the sum of simple power law-spectra with slopes differing by ~ 1.8; from differential slope -3.8 for Galactic particles (near logE = 19) to ~ -2.0 for extragalactic sources. In the other models, on the other hand, the ankle is intrinsic to the extragalactic component alone, and arises from the shape of the rate of energy loss versus energy for the (assumed) protons interacting with the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Our detailed analysis of the world's data on the ultra-high energy spectrum shows that taken together, or separately, the resulting mean sharpness of the ankle (second difference of the log(intensity*E^3) with respect to logE) is consistent with our `mixed' model. For explanation in terms of extragalactic particles alone, however, the ankle will be at the wrong energy - for reasonable production models and of insufficient magnitude if, as seems likely, there is still a significant fraction of heavy nuclei at the ankle energy.
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0406511  [pdf] - 65668
No 'cut off' in the High Energy Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum
Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2004-06-23, last modified: 2004-08-26
It is often claimed that there should be a 'GZK cut-off" in the flux of extragalactic cosmic rays, arising from interactions between the cosmic rays and the cosmic micro-wave background photons (e.g. 1 and 2). Some experiments (3 and 4) show particles of even higher energy than this value and this has led to claims for exotic processes (e.g. 5 and 6). We contend that such claims are unnecessary - there is no predicted cut-off, rather a continuation of the injection spectrum at reduced intensity. We have combined the world's data and shown that the prediction for a rather flat injection spectrum (exponent: 1.9 - 2.2) in the case of universal particle injection provides a reasonable fit to the data. Conventional forms for the particle attenuation in the intergalactic medium (e.g. 7 and 8) have been assumed. Either protons or iron nuclei (or a mixture) will suffice. Attention is drawn to another aspect, too, that of the losses on the infra-red radiation which may be intense near to strong sources and for sources in galaxy clusters. The attendant magnetic fields near the sources leads to significantly long diffusion times through the strong infra-red fields. Two 'case histories' are considered.
[19]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0406641  [pdf] - 65798
Propagation of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays in Extragalactic Magnetic Fields
Comments: 23 pages
Submitted: 2004-06-29
In this paper we will discuss the problem of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR) and show that the idea of a Single Source Model established by Erlykin and Wolfendale (1997) to explain the features seen in cosmic ray energy spectra around the 10**15 eV region can be successfully applied also for the much higher energies. The propagation of UHECR (of energies higher than 10**19 eV) in extragalactic magnetic fields can no longer be described as a random walk (diffusion) process and the transition to rectilinear propagation gives a possible explanation for the so-called Greisen-Zatzepin-Kuzmin (GZK) cut-off which still remains an open question after almost 40 years. A transient "single source" located at a particular distance and producing UHECR for a finite time is the proposed solution.
[20]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9708236  [pdf] - 363192
Measurable difference in Cherenkov light between gamma and hadron induced EAS
Comments: 14 pages, 8 PostScript figures, LaTeX
Submitted: 1997-08-26
We describe the possibly measurable difference in the Cherenkov light component of EAS induced by an electromagnetic particle (e+, e- or gamma) and induced by a hadron (i.e. proton or heavier nuclei) in TeV range. The method can be applied in experiments which use wavefront sampling method of EAS Cherenkov light detection (e.g. THEMISTOCLE, ASGAT).