Normalized to: Weller, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.00050 [pdf] - 2126330
A DESGW Search for the Electromagnetic Counterpart to the LIGO/Virgo
Gravitational Wave Binary Neutron Star Merger Candidate S190510g
DES Collaboration;
Garcia, A.;
Morgan, R.;
Herner, K.;
Palmese, A.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Santana-Silva, L.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Allam, S.;
Wiesner, M.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Sako, M.;
Kessler, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Scolnic, D.;
E., F. Olivares;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Sherman, N.;
Conselice, C.;
Chen, H.;
Foley, R. J.;
Doctor, Z.;
Horvath, J.;
Howell, D. A.;
Kilpatrick, C. D.;
Casares, J.;
Cooke, J.;
Rest, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Varga, T. N.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2020-06-30
We present the results from a search for the electromagnetic counterpart of
the LIGO/Virgo event S190510g using the Dark Energy Camera (DECam). S190510g is
a binary neutron star (BNS) merger candidate of moderate significance detected
at a distance of 227$\pm$92 Mpc and localized within an area of 31 (1166)
square degrees at 50\% (90\%) confidence. While this event was later classified
as likely non-astrophysical in nature within 30 hours of the event, our short
latency search and discovery pipeline identified 11 counterpart candidates, all
of which appear consistent with supernovae following offline analysis and
spectroscopy by other instruments. Later reprocessing of the images enabled the
recovery of 6 more candidates. Additionally, we implement our candidate
selection procedure on simulated kilonovae and supernovae under DECam observing
conditions (e.g., seeing, exposure time) with the intent of quantifying our
search efficiency and making informed decisions on observing strategy for
future similar events. This is the first BNS counterpart search to employ a
comprehensive simulation-based efficiency study. We find that using the current
follow-up strategy, there would need to be 19 events similar to S190510g for us
to have a 99\% chance of detecting an optical counterpart, assuming a
GW170817-like kilonova. We further conclude that optimization of observing
plans, which should include preference for deeper images over multiple color
information, could result in up to a factor of 1.5 reduction in the total
number of followups needed for discovery.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.10162 [pdf] - 2117715
$\mu_{\star}$ Masses: Weak Lensing Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
Year 1 redMaPPer Clusters using Stellar Masses
Pereira, M. E. S.;
Palmese, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
McClintock, T.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Burgad, J.;
Annis, J.;
Farahi, A.;
Lin, H.;
Choi, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Esteves, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
MacCrann, N.;
Roodman, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
Shin, T.;
von der Linden, A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2020-06-17
We present the weak lensing mass calibration of the stellar mass based
$\mu_{\star}$ mass proxy for redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1. For the first time we are able to perform a calibration of
$\mu_{\star}$ at high redshifts, $z>0.33$. In a blinded analysis, we use $\sim
6,000$ clusters split into 12 subsets spanning the ranges $0.1 \leqslant
z<0.65$ and $\mu_{\star}$ up to $\sim 5.5 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}$, and infer
the average masses of these subsets through modelling of their stacked weak
lensing signal. In our model we account for the following sources of systematic
uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors, miscentring,
cluster-member contamination of the source sample, deviations from the NFW halo
profile, halo triaxiality and projection effects. We use the inferred masses to
estimate the joint mass--$\mu_{\star}$--$z$ scaling relation given by $\langle
M_{200c} | \mu_{\star},z \rangle = M_0 (\mu_{\star}/5.16\times 10^{12}
\mathrm{M_{\odot}})^{F_{\mu_{\star}}} ((1+z)/1.35)^{G_z}$. We find $M_0= (1.14
\pm 0.07) \times 10^{14} \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ with $F_{\mu_{\star}}= 0.76 \pm
0.06$ and $G_z= -1.14 \pm 0.37$. We discuss the use of $\mu_{\star}$ as a
complementary mass proxy to the well-studied richness $\lambda$ for: $i)$
exploring the regimes of low $z$, $\lambda<20$ and high $\lambda$, $z \sim 1$;
$ii)$ testing systematics such as projection effects for applications in
cluster cosmology.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.09757 [pdf] - 2101566
Studying Type II supernovae as cosmological standard candles using the
Dark Energy Survey
de Jaeger, T.;
Galbany, L.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Förster, F.;
Hamuy, M.;
Brown, P. J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Gutiérrez, C. P.;
Inserra, C.;
Lewis, G F.;
Möller, A.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Brout, D.;
Carollo, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Macaulay, E.;
Nichol, B.;
Sako, M.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Costanzi, M.;
Crocce, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R.
Submitted: 2020-05-19
Despite vast improvements in the measurement of the cosmological parameters,
the nature of dark energy and an accurate value of the Hubble constant (H$_0$)
in the Hubble-Lema\^itre law remain unknown. To break the current impasse, it
is necessary to develop as many independent techniques as possible, such as the
use of Type II supernovae (SNe II). The goal of this paper is to demonstrate
the utility of SNe II for deriving accurate extragalactic distances, which will
be an asset for the next generation of telescopes where more-distant SNe II
will be discovered. More specifically, we present a sample from the Dark Energy
Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN) consisting of 15 SNe II with photometric and
spectroscopic information spanning a redshift range up to 0.35. Combining our
DES SNe with publicly available samples, and using the standard candle method
(SCM), we construct the largest available Hubble diagram with SNe II in the
Hubble flow (70 SNe II) and find an observed dispersion of 0.27 mag. We
demonstrate that adding a colour term to the SN II standardisation does not
reduce the scatter in the Hubble diagram. Although SNe II are viable as
distance indicators, this work points out important issues for improving their
utility as independent extragalactic beacons: find new correlations, define a
more standard subclass of SNe II, construct new SN II templates, and dedicate
more observing time to high-redshift SNe II. Finally, for the first time, we
perform simulations to estimate the redshift-dependent distance-modulus bias
due to selection effects.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05929 [pdf] - 2089021
Blinding multi-probe cosmological experiments
Muir, J.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Elsner, F.;
Krause, E.;
Roodman, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Zuntz, J.;
Collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2019-11-13, last modified: 2020-05-04
The goal of blinding is to hide an experiment's critical results -- here the
inferred cosmological parameters -- until all decisions affecting its analysis
have been finalised. This is especially important in the current era of
precision cosmology, when the results of any new experiment are closely
scrutinised for consistency or tension with previous results. In analyses that
combine multiple observational probes, like the combination of galaxy
clustering and weak lensing in the Dark Energy Survey (DES), it is challenging
to blind the results while retaining the ability to check for (in)consistency
between different parts of the data. We propose a simple new blinding
transformation that works by modifying the summary statistics that are input to
parameter estimation, such as two-point correlation functions. The
transformation shifts the measured statistics to new values that are consistent
with (blindly) shifted cosmological parameters, while preserving internal
(in)consistency. We apply the blinding transformation to simulated data for the
projected DES Year 3 galaxy clustering and weak lensing analysis, demonstrating
that practical blinding is achieved without significant perturbation of
internal-consistency checks, as measured here by degradation of the $\chi^2$
between data and best-fitting model. Our blinding method conserves $\chi^2$
more precisely as experiments evolve to higher precision.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.03262 [pdf] - 2124579
CODEX clusters. The Survey, the Catalog, and Cosmology of the X-ray
Luminosity Function
Finoguenov, A.;
Rykoff, E.;
Clerc, N.;
Costanzi, M.;
Hagstotz, S.;
Chitham, J. Ider;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Capasso, R.;
Comparat, J.;
Damsted, S.;
Dupke, R.;
Erfanianfar, G.;
Henry, J. Patrick;
Kaefer, F.;
Kneib, J-P.;
Lindholm, V.;
Rozo, E.;
van Waerbeke, L.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-12-06, last modified: 2020-04-29
Large area catalogs of galaxy clusters constructed from ROSAT All Sky Survey
provide the base for our knowledge on the population of clusters thanks to the
long-term multiwavelength efforts on their follow-up. Advent of large area
photometric surveys superseding in depth previous all-sky data allows us to
revisit the construction of X-ray cluster catalogs, extending the study to
lower cluster masses and to higher redshifts and to provide the modelling of
the selection function. We perform a wavelet detection of X-ray sources and
make extensive simulations of the detection of clusters in the RASS data. We
assign an optical richness to each of the 24,788 detected X-ray sources in the
10,382 square degrees of SDSS BOSS area, using redMaPPer version 5.2. We name
this survey COnstrain Dark Energy with X-ray (CODEX) clusters. We show that
there is no obvious separation of sources on galaxy clusters and AGN, based on
distribution of systems on their richness. This is a combination of increasing
number of galaxy groups and their selection as identification of an X-ray
sources either by chance or due to groups hosting an AGN. To clean the sample,
we use a cut on the optical richness at the level corresponding to the 10\%
completeness of the survey and include it into the modelling of cluster
selection function. We present the X-ray catalog extending to a redshift of 0.6
down to X-ray fluxes of $10^{-13}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. We provide the
modelling of the sample selection and discuss the redshift evolution of the
high end of the X-ray luminosity function (XLF). Our results on $z<0.3$ XLF are
in agreement with previous studies, while we provide new constraints on the
$0.3<z<0.6$ XLF. We find a lack of strong redshift evolution of the XLF,
provide exact modeling of the effect of low number statistics and AGN
contamination and present the resulting constraints on the flat $\Lambda$CDM.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10454 [pdf] - 2129267
The impact of spectroscopic incompleteness in direct calibration of
redshift distributions for weak lensing surveys
Hartley, W. G.;
Chang, C.;
Samani, S.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Davis, T. M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Asorey, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Kuehn, K.;
King, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
DeRose, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchon, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-03-23
Obtaining accurate distributions of galaxy redshifts is a critical aspect of
weak lensing cosmology experiments. One of the methods used to estimate and
validate redshift distributions is apply weights to a spectroscopic sample so
that their weighted photometry distribution matches the target sample. In this
work we estimate the \textit{selection bias} in redshift that is introduced in
this procedure. We do so by simulating the process of assembling a
spectroscopic sample (including observer-assigned confidence flags) and
highlight the impacts of spectroscopic target selection and redshift failures.
We use the first year (Y1) weak lensing analysis in DES as an example data set
but the implications generalise to all similar weak lensing surveys. We find
that using colour cuts that are not available to the weak lensing galaxies can
introduce biases of $\Delta~z\sim0.015$ in the weighted mean redshift of
different redshift intervals. To assess the impact of incompleteness in
spectroscopic samples, we select only objects with high observer-defined
confidence flags and compare the weighted mean redshift with the true mean. We
find that the mean redshift of the DES Y1 weak lensing sample is typically
biased at the $\Delta~z=0.005-0.05$ level after the weighting is applied. The
bias we uncover can have either sign, depending on the samples and redshift
interval considered. For the highest redshift bin, the bias is larger than the
uncertainties in the other DES Y1 redshift calibration methods, justifying the
decision of not using this method for the redshift estimations. We discuss
several methods to mitigate this bias.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.03382 [pdf] - 2060924
Physical parameter space of bimetric theory and SN1a constraints
Submitted: 2020-03-06
Bimetric theory describes a massless and a massive spin-2 field with fully
non-linear (self-)interactions. It has a rich phenomenology and has been
successfully tested with several data sets. However, the observational
constraints have not been combined in a consistent framework, yet. We propose a
parametrization of bimetric solutions in terms of the effective cosmological
constant $\Lambda$ and the mass $m_\mathrm{FP}$ of the spin-2 field as well as
its coupling strength to ordinary matter $\bar\alpha$. This simplifies choosing
priors in statistical analysis and allows to directly constrain these
parameters with observational data not only from local systems but also from
cosmology. By identifying the physical vacuum of bimetric theory these
parameters are uniquely determined. We work out the dictionary for the new
parametrization for various submodels and present the implied consistency
constraints on the physical parameter space. We then apply the dictionary to
derive observational constraints from SN1a on the physical parameters. As a
result we find that even self-accelerating models with a heavy spin-2 field are
in perfect agreement with current supernova data.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.10834 [pdf] - 2055410
Validation of Selection Function, Sample Contamination and Mass
Calibration in Galaxy Cluster Samples
Grandis, S.;
Klein, M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Paulus, M.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Capasso, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Stark, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-02-25, last modified: 2020-02-26
We construct and validate the selection function of the MARD-Y3 sample. This
sample was selected through optical follow-up of the 2nd ROSAT faint source
catalog (2RXS) with Dark Energy Survey year 3 (DES-Y3) data. The selection
function is modeled by combining an empirically constructed X-ray selection
function with an incompleteness model for the optical follow-up. We validate
the joint selection function by testing the consistency of the constraints on
the X-ray flux--mass and richness--mass scaling relation parameters derived
from different sources of mass information: (1) cross-calibration using SPT-SZ
clusters, (2) calibration using number counts in X-ray, in optical and in both
X-ray and optical while marginalizing over cosmological parameters, and (3)
other published analyses. We find that the constraints on the scaling relation
from the number counts and SPT-SZ cross-calibration agree, indicating that our
modeling of the selection function is adequate. Furthermore, we apply a largely
cosmology independent method to validate selection functions via the
computation of the probability of finding each cluster in the SPT-SZ sample in
the MARD-Y3 sample and vice-versa. This test reveals no clear evidence for
MARD-Y3 contamination, SPT-SZ incompleteness or outlier fraction. Finally, we
discuss the prospects of the techniques presented here to limit systematic
selection effects in future cluster cosmological studies.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11124 [pdf] - 2055421
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster
Abundances and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, Tim;
Aguena, Michel;
Alarcon, Alex;
Allam, Sahar;
Allen, Steve;
Annis, James;
Avila, Santiago;
Bacon, David;
Bermeo, Alberto;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bhargava, Sunayana;
Bocquet, Sebastian;
Brooks, David;
Brout, Dillon;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Burke, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco Javier;
Cawthon, Ross;
Chang, Chihway;
Chen, Xinyi;
Choi, Ami;
Costanzi, Matteo;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz;
Davis, Tamara;
De Vicente, Juan;
DeRose, Joseph;
Desai, Shantanu;
Diehl, H. Thomas;
Dietrich, Jörg;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Eckert, Kathleen;
Eifler, Tim;
Elvin-Poole, Jack;
Estrada, Juan;
Everett, Spencer;
Evrard, August;
Farahi, Arya;
Ferrero, Ismael;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gatti, Marco;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Gerdes, David;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Giles, Paul;
Grandis, Sebastian;
Gruen, Daniel;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gschwend, Julia;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will;
Hinton, Samuel;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Hoyle, Ben;
Huterer, Dragan;
James, David;
Jarvis, Mike;
Jeltema, Tesla;
Johnson, Margaret;
Kent, Stephen;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kron, Richard;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lahav, Ofer;
Li, Ting;
Lidman, Christopher;
Lima, Marcos;
Lin, Huan;
MacCrann, Niall;
Maia, Marcio;
Mantz, Adam;
Marshall, Jennifer;
Martini, Paul;
Mayers, Julian;
Melchior, Peter;
Mena, Juan;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miquel, Ramon;
Mohr, Joe;
Nichol, Robert;
Nord, Brian;
Ogando, Ricardo;
Palmese, Antonella;
Paz-Chinchon, Francisco;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Prat, Judit;
Rau, Markus Michael;
Romer, Kathy;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rooney, Philip;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sako, Masao;
Samuroff, Simon;
Sanchez, Carles;
Saro, Alexandro;
Scarpine, Vic;
Schubnell, Michael;
Scolnic, Daniel;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Sheldon, Erin;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Thomas, Daniel;
To, Chun-Hao;
Troxel, Michael A.;
Tucker, Douglas;
Varga, Tamas Norbert;
von der Linden, Anja;
Walker, Alistair;
Wechsler, Risa;
Weller, Jochen;
Wilkinson, Reese;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Yanny, Brian;
Zhang, Zhuowen;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2020-02-25
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of
redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset.
Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as
were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in
surprisingly low values for $S_8 =\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm
0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $\Omega_{\rm
m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $\sigma_8-\Omega_{\rm m}$ posteriors in
$2.4\sigma$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6\sigma$ with the
Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding
changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with
other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact
that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations,
cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster
analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence
of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant
physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent
constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest
that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather
than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness
threshold ($\lambda \ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other
probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by
our model.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.00436 [pdf] - 2028341
The bias of cosmic voids in the presence of massive neutrinos
Submitted: 2019-05-01, last modified: 2020-01-09
Cosmic voids offer an extraordinary opportunity to study the effects of
massive neutrinos on cosmological scales. Because they are freely streaming,
neutrinos can penetrate the interior of voids more easily than cold dark matter
or baryons, which makes their relative contribution to the mass budget in voids
much higher than elsewhere in the Universe. In simulations it has recently been
shown how various characteristics of voids in the matter distribution are
affected by neutrinos, such as their abundance, density profiles, dynamics, and
clustering properties. However, the tracers used to identify voids in
observations (e.g., galaxies or halos) are affected by neutrinos as well, and
isolating the unique neutrino signatures inherent to voids becomes more
difficult. In this paper we make use of the DEMNUni suite of simulations to
investigate the clustering bias of voids in Fourier space as a function of
their core density and compensation. We find a clear dependence on the sum of
neutrino masses that remains significant even for void statistics extracted
from halos. In particular, we observe that the amplitude of the linear void
bias increases with neutrino mass for voids defined in dark matter, whereas
this trend gets reversed and slightly attenuated when measuring the relative
void-halo bias using voids identified in the halo distribution. Finally, we
argue how the original behaviour can be restored when considering observations
of the total matter distribution (e.g. via weak lensing), and comment on
scale-dependent effects in the void bias that may provide additional
information on neutrinos in the future.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.01724 [pdf] - 2026608
Updated design of the CMB polarization experiment satellite LiteBIRD
Sugai, H.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Akiba, Y.;
Alonso, D.;
Arnold, K.;
Aumont, J.;
Austermann, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Banerji, R.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Basak, S.;
Beall, J.;
Beckman, S.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Borrill, J.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Buzzelli, A.;
Calabrese, E.;
Casas, F. J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chan, V.;
Chinone, Y.;
Cliche, J. -F.;
Columbro, F.;
Cukierman, A.;
Curtis, D.;
Danto, P.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Haan, T.;
De Petris, M.;
Dickinson, C.;
Dobbs, M.;
Dotani, T.;
Duband, L.;
Ducout, A.;
Duff, S.;
Duivenvoorden, A.;
Duval, J. -M.;
Ebisawa, K.;
Elleflot, T.;
Enokida, H.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Errard, J.;
Essinger-Hileman, T.;
Finelli, F.;
Flauger, R.;
Franceschet, C.;
Fuskeland, U.;
Ganga, K.;
Gao, J. -R.;
Génova-Santos, R.;
Ghigna, T.;
Gomez, A.;
Gradziel, M. L.;
Grain, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Hargrave, P.;
Hasebe, T.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hattori, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hill, C.;
Hilton, G.;
Hirota, Y.;
Hivon, E.;
Hlozek, R.;
Hoang, D. -T.;
Hubmayr, J.;
Ichiki, K.;
Iida, T.;
Imada, H.;
Ishimura, K.;
Ishino, H.;
Jaehnig, G. C.;
Jones, M.;
Kaga, T.;
Kashima, S.;
Kataoka, Y.;
Katayama, N.;
Kawasaki, T.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kibayashi, A.;
Kikuchi, T.;
Kimura, K.;
Kisner, T.;
Kobayashi, Y.;
Kogiso, N.;
Kogut, A.;
Kohri, K.;
Komatsu, E.;
Komatsu, K.;
Konishi, K.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kuo, C. L.;
Kurinsky, N.;
Kushino, A.;
Kuwata-Gonokami, M.;
Lamagna, L.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lee, A. T.;
Linder, E.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Maki, M.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Mathon, R.;
Matsumura, T.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Minami, Y.;
Mistuda, K.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mot, B.;
Murata, Y.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Nagai, M.;
Nagata, R.;
Nakamura, S.;
Namikawa, T.;
Natoli, P.;
Nerva, S.;
Nishibori, T.;
Nishino, H.;
Nomura, Y.;
Noviello, F.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Ochi, H.;
Ogawa, H.;
Ogawa, H.;
Ohsaki, H.;
Ohta, I.;
Okada, N.;
Okada, N.;
Pagano, L.;
Paiella, A.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Piacentini, F.;
Pisano, G.;
Polenta, G.;
Poletti, D.;
Prouvé, T.;
Puglisi, G.;
Rambaud, D.;
Raum, C.;
Realini, S.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Roudil, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Russell, M.;
Sakurai, H.;
Sakurai, Y.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Sekimoto, Y.;
Sherwin, B. D.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Shirron, P.;
Signorelli, G.;
Smecher, G.;
Spizzi, P.;
Stever, S. L.;
Stompor, R.;
Sugiyama, S.;
Suzuki, A.;
Suzuki, J.;
Switzer, E.;
Takaku, R.;
Takakura, H.;
Takakura, S.;
Takeda, Y.;
Taylor, A.;
Taylor, E.;
Terao, Y.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Thorne, B.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tomida, H.;
Trappe, N.;
Tristram, M.;
Tsuji, M.;
Tsujimoto, M.;
Tucker, C.;
Ullom, J.;
Uozumi, S.;
Utsunomiya, S.;
Van Lanen, J.;
Vermeulen, G.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vissers, M.;
Vittorio, N.;
Voisin, F.;
Walker, I.;
Watanabe, N.;
Wehus, I.;
Weller, J.;
Westbrook, B.;
Winter, B.;
Wollack, E.;
Yamamoto, R.;
Yamasaki, N. Y.;
Yanagisawa, M.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yumoto, J.;
Zannoni, M.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-01-06
Recent developments of transition-edge sensors (TESs), based on extensive
experience in ground-based experiments, have been making the sensor techniques
mature enough for their application on future satellite CMB polarization
experiments. LiteBIRD is in the most advanced phase among such future
satellites, targeting its launch in Japanese Fiscal Year 2027 (2027FY) with
JAXA's H3 rocket. It will accommodate more than 4000 TESs in focal planes of
reflective low-frequency and refractive medium-and-high-frequency telescopes in
order to detect a signature imprinted on the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
by the primordial gravitational waves predicted in cosmic inflation. The total
wide frequency coverage between 34GHz and 448GHz enables us to extract such
weak spiral polarization patterns through the precise subtraction of our
Galaxy's foreground emission by using spectral differences among CMB and
foreground signals. Telescopes are cooled down to 5Kelvin for suppressing
thermal noise and contain polarization modulators with transmissive half-wave
plates at individual apertures for separating sky polarization signals from
artificial polarization and for mitigating from instrumental 1/f noise. Passive
cooling by using V-grooves supports active cooling with mechanical coolers as
well as adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators. Sky observations from the
second Sun-Earth Lagrangian point, L2, are planned for three years. An
international collaboration between Japan, USA, Canada, and Europe is sharing
various roles. In May 2019, the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science
(ISAS), JAXA selected LiteBIRD as the strategic large mission No. 2.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.04121 [pdf] - 2061583
The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey
Bleem, L. E.;
Bocquet, S.;
Stalder, B.;
Gladders, M. D.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Allen, S. W.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Annis, J.;
Ashby, M. L. N.;
Austermann, J. E.;
Avila, S.;
Avva, J. S.;
Bayliss, M.;
Beall, J. A.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blake, C.;
Brodwin, M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Citron, R.;
Moran, C. Corbett;
Costanzi, M.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, W.;
Flaugher, B.;
Floyd, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gallicchio, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gilbert, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, N.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N.;
Henning, J. W.;
Heymans, C.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huang, N.;
Hubmayr, J.;
Irwin, K. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Joudaki, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Knox, L.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lee, A. T.;
Li, D.;
Lidman, C.;
Lowitz, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Mahler, G.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McDonald, M.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nibarger, J. P.;
Noble, G.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Palmese, A.;
Parkinson, D.;
Patil, S.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Ramachandra, N. S.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
González, J. D. Remolina;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Saliwanchik, B. R.;
Sanchez, E.;
Saro, A.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schrabback, T.;
Serrano, S.;
Sharon, K.;
Sievers, C.;
Smecher, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, C.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Veach, T.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Weller, J.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2019-10-09, last modified: 2019-12-13
We describe the observations and resultant galaxy cluster catalog from the
2770 deg$^2$ SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey (SPT-ECS). Clusters are identified
via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect, and confirmed with a combination of
archival and targeted follow-up data, making particular use of data from the
Dark Energy Survey (DES). With incomplete followup we have confirmed as
clusters 244 of 266 candidates at a detection significance $\xi \ge 5$ and an
additional 204 systems at $4<\xi<5$. The confirmed sample has a median mass of
$M_{500c} \sim {4.4 \times 10^{14} M_\odot h_{70}^{-1}}$, a median redshift of
$z=0.49$, and we have identified 44 strong gravitational lenses in the sample
thus far. Radio data are used to characterize contamination to the SZ signal;
the median contamination for confirmed clusters is predicted to be $\sim$1% of
the SZ signal at the $\xi>4$ threshold, and $<4\%$ of clusters have a predicted
contamination $>10\% $ of their measured SZ flux. We associate SZ-selected
clusters, from both SPT-ECS and the SPT-SZ survey, with clusters from the DES
redMaPPer sample, and find an offset distribution between the SZ center and
central galaxy in general agreement with previous work, though with a larger
fraction of clusters with significant offsets. Adopting a fixed Planck-like
cosmology, we measure the optical richness-to-SZ-mass ($\lambda-M$) relation
and find it to be 28% shallower than that from a weak-lensing analysis of the
DES data---a difference significant at the 4 $\sigma$ level---with the
relations intersecting at $\lambda=60$ . The SPT-ECS cluster sample will be
particularly useful for studying the evolution of massive clusters and, in
combination with DES lensing observations and the SPT-SZ cluster sample, will
be an important component of future cosmological analyses.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.01386 [pdf] - 1996113
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and
light around cosmic voids
Fang, Y.;
Hamaus, N.;
Jain, B.;
Pandey, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Kovács, A.;
Chang, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Choi, A.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-09-03, last modified: 2019-11-11
What are the mass and galaxy profiles of cosmic voids? In this paper we use
two methods to extract voids in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaGiC
galaxy sample to address this question. We use either 2D slices in projection,
or the 3D distribution of galaxies based on photometric redshifts to identify
voids. For the mass profile, we measure the tangential shear profiles of
background galaxies to infer the excess surface mass density. The
signal-to-noise ratio for our lensing measurement ranges between 10.7 and 14.0
for the two void samples. We infer their 3D density profiles by fitting models
based on N-body simulations and find good agreement for void radii in the range
15-85 Mpc. Comparison with their galaxy profiles then allows us to test the
relation between mass and light at the 10%-level, the most stringent test to
date. We find very similar shapes for the two profiles, consistent with a
linear relationship between mass and light both within and outside the void
radius. We validate our analysis with the help of simulated mock catalogues and
estimate the impact of photometric redshift uncertainties on the measurement.
Our methodology can be used for cosmological applications, including tests of
gravity with voids. This is especially promising when the lensing profiles are
combined with spectroscopic measurements of void dynamics via redshift-space
distortions.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02499 [pdf] - 1995367
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological
Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, S.;
Lemos, P.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Raveri, M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-11-08
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models
dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a
combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the
first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external
data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated
scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $\Omega_k$, 2) number of relativistic species
$N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying
equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$
(alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$),
and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $\mu_0$ and $\Sigma_0$ that
modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck
CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements
from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on
curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external
data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find
$\Omega_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm
eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying
equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23},
-0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p,
w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1
combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the
temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the
present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $\Sigma_0=
0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(\Sigma_0,
\mu_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with
external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.02951 [pdf] - 1995564
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: the lensing imprint of cosmic voids
on the Cosmic Microwave Background
Vielzeuf, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Demirbozan, U.;
Fosalba, P.;
Baxter, E.;
Hamaus, N.;
Huterer, D.;
Miquel, R.;
Nadathur, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchón, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Noarbe, I. Sevilla-;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2019-11-06
Cosmic voids gravitationally lens the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
radiation, resulting in a distinct imprint on degree scales. We use the
simulated CMB lensing convergence map from the MICE N-body simulation to
calibrate our detection strategy for a given void definition and galaxy tracer
density. We then identify cosmic voids in DES Year 1 data and stack the Planck
2015 lensing convergence map on their locations, probing the consistency of
simulated and observed void lensing signals. When fixing the shape of the
stacked convergence profile to that calibrated from simulations, we find
imprints at the $3{\sigma}$ significance level for various analysis choices.
The best measurement strategies based on the MICE calibration process yield
$S/N \sim 4$ for DES Y1, and the best-fit amplitude recovered from the data is
consistent with expectations from MICE ($A \sim 1$). Given these results as
well as the agreement between them and N-body simulations, we conclude that the
previously reported excess integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) signal associated with
cosmic voids in DES Y1 has no counterpart in the Planck CMB lensing map.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02212 [pdf] - 1922933
Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT and Planck
Prat, J.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Shin, T.;
Sánchez, C.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Nicola, A.;
Omori, Y.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Chown, R.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, W. B.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
de Haan, T.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Knox, L.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-07-25
Correlations between tracers of the matter density field and gravitational
lensing are sensitive to the evolution of the matter power spectrum and the
expansion rate across cosmic time. Appropriately defined ratios of such
correlation functions, on the other hand, depend only on the angular diameter
distances to the tracer objects and to the gravitational lensing source planes.
Because of their simple cosmological dependence, such ratios can exploit
available signal-to-noise down to small angular scales, even where directly
modeling the correlation functions is difficult. We present a measurement of
lensing ratios using galaxy position and lensing data from the Dark Energy
Survey, and CMB lensing data from the South Pole Telescope and Planck,
obtaining the highest precision lensing ratio measurements to date. Relative to
the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model, we find a best fit lensing ratio amplitude
of $A = 1.1 \pm 0.1$. We use the ratio measurements to generate cosmological
constraints, focusing on the curvature parameter. We demonstrate that
photometrically selected galaxies can be used to measure lensing ratios, and
argue that future lensing ratio measurements with data from a combination of
LSST and Stage-4 CMB experiments can be used to place interesting cosmological
constraints, even after considering the systematic uncertainties associated
with photometric redshift and galaxy shear estimation.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07193 [pdf] - 2113957
A DECam Search for Explosive Optical Transients Associated with IceCube
Neutrinos
Morgan, R.;
Bechtol, K.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Herner, K.;
Doctor, Z.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Neilson, K. N.;
Kowalski, M.;
Palmese, A.;
Swann, E.;
Thomas, B. P.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Garcia, A.;
Brout, D.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Neilsen, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-07-16
To facilitate multimessenger studies with TeV and PeV astrophysical
neutrinos, the IceCube Collaboration has developed a realtime alert system for
the highest confidence and best localized neutrino events. In this work we
investigate the likelihood of association between realtime high-energy neutrino
alerts and explosive optical transients, with a focus on core-collapse
supernovae (CC SNe) as candidate neutrino sources. We report results from
triggered optical follow-up observations of two IceCube alerts, IC170922A and
IC171106A, with Blanco/DECam ($gri$ to 24th magnitude in $\sim6$ epochs). Based
on a suite of simulated supernova light curves, we develop and validate
selection criteria for CC SNe exploding in coincidence with neutrino alerts.
The DECam observations are sensitive to CC SNe at redshifts $z \lesssim 0.3$.
At redshifts $z \lesssim 0.1$, our selection criteria reduce background SNe
contamination to a level below the predicted signal. For the IC170922A
(IC171106A) follow-up observations, we expect that 12.1% (9.5%) of coincident
CC SNe at $z \lesssim 0.3$ are recovered, and that on average, 0.23 (0.07)
unassociated SNe in the 90% containment regions also pass our selection
criteria. We find two total candidate CC SNe that are temporally coincident
with the neutrino alerts, but none in the 90% containment regions, which is
statistically consistent with expected rates of background CC SNe for these
observations. Given the signal efficiencies and background rates derived from
this pilot study, we estimate that to determine whether CC SNe are the dominant
contribution to the total TeV-PeV energy IceCube neutrino flux at the $3\sigma$
confidence level, DECam observations similar to those of this work would be
needed for $\sim200$ neutrino alerts, though this number falls to $\sim60$
neutrino alerts if redshift information is available for all candidates.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.04707 [pdf] - 1905883
Euclid preparation III. Galaxy cluster detection in the wide photometric
survey, performance and algorithm selection
Euclid Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Vannier, M.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Adami, C.;
Ascaso, B.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Cappi, A.;
Díaz-Sánchez, A.;
Durret, F.;
Farrens, S.;
Gonzalez, A. H.;
Iovino, A.;
Licitra, R.;
Maturi, M.;
Mei, S.;
Merson, A.;
Munari, E.;
Pelló, R.;
Ricci, M.;
Rocci, P. F.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Sarron, F.;
Amoura, Y.;
Andreon, S.;
Apostolakos, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baugh, C. M.;
Borgani, S.;
Brodwin, M.;
Castander, F.;
Castignani, G.;
Cucciati, O.;
De Lucia, G.;
Dubath, P.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Mamon, G. A.;
Melin, J. B.;
Moscardini, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Radovich, M.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sereno, M.;
Weller, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Corcione, L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Sirri, G.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Zamorani, G.
Submitted: 2019-06-11, last modified: 2019-06-19
Galaxy cluster counts in bins of mass and redshift have been shown to be a
competitive probe to test cosmological models. This method requires an
efficient blind detection of clusters from surveys with a well-known selection
function and robust mass estimates. The Euclid wide survey will cover 15000
deg$^2$ of the sky in the optical and near-infrared bands, down to magnitude 24
in the $H$-band. The resulting data will make it possible to detect a large
number of galaxy clusters spanning a wide-range of masses up to redshift $\sim
2$. This paper presents the final results of the Euclid Cluster Finder
Challenge (CFC). The objective of these challenges was to select the cluster
detection algorithms that best meet the requirements of the Euclid mission. The
final CFC included six independent detection algorithms, based on different
techniques, such as photometric redshift tomography, optimal filtering,
hierarchical approach, wavelet and friend-of-friends algorithms. These
algorithms were blindly applied to a mock galaxy catalog with representative
Euclid-like properties. The relative performance of the algorithms was assessed
by matching the resulting detections to known clusters in the simulations.
Several matching procedures were tested, thus making it possible to estimate
the associated systematic effects on completeness to $<3$%. All the tested
algorithms are very competitive in terms of performance, with three of them
reaching $>80$% completeness for a mean purity of 80% down to masses of
$10^{14}$ M$_{\odot}$ and up to redshift $z=2$. Based on these results, two
algorithms were selected to be implemented in the Euclid pipeline, the AMICO
code, based on matched filtering, and the PZWav code, based on an adaptive
wavelet approach. [abridged]
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01136 [pdf] - 1966790
Producing a BOSS-CMASS sample with DES imaging
Lee, S.;
Huff, E. M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Choi, A.;
Hirata, C.;
Honscheid, K.;
MacCrann, N.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Cawthon, R.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2019-06-03
We present a sample of galaxies with the Dark Energy Survey (DES) photometry
that replicates the properties of the BOSS CMASS sample. The CMASS galaxy
sample has been well characterized by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)
collaboration and was used to obtain the most powerful redshift-space galaxy
clustering measurements to date. A joint analysis of redshift-space distortions
(such as those probed by CMASS from SDSS) and a galaxy-galaxy lensing
measurement for an equivalent sample from DES can provide powerful cosmological
constraints. Unfortunately, the DES and SDSS-BOSS footprints have only minimal
overlap, primarily on the celestial equator near the SDSS Stripe 82 region.
Using this overlap, we build a robust Bayesian model to select CMASS-like
galaxies in the remainder of the DES footprint. The newly defined DES-CMASS
(DMASS) sample consists of 117,293 effective galaxies covering $1,244 {\rm
deg}^2$. Through various validation tests, we show that the DMASS sample
selected by this model matches well with the BOSS CMASS sample, specifically in
the South Galactic cap (SGC) region that includes Stripe 82. Combining
measurements of the angular correlation function and the clustering-z
distribution of DMASS, we constrain the difference in mean galaxy bias and mean
redshift between the BOSS CMASS and DMASS samples to be $\Delta b =
0.010^{+0.045}_{-0.052}$ and $\Delta z = \left( 3.46^{+5.48}_{-5.55} \right)
\times 10^{-3}$ for the SGC portion of CMASS, and $\Delta b =
0.044^{+0.044}_{-0.043} $ and $\Delta z= ( 3.51^{+4.93}_{-5.91}) \times
10^{-3}$ for the full CMASS sample. These values indicate that the mean bias of
galaxies and mean redshift in the DMASS sample is consistent with both CMASS
samples within $1\sigma$.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01018 [pdf] - 2088970
Monte Carlo Control Loops for cosmic shear cosmology with DES Year 1
Kacprzak, T.;
Herbel, J.;
Nicola, A.;
Sgier, R.;
Tarsitano, F.;
Bruderer, C.;
Amara, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Secco, L. F.;
Zuntz, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Vikram, V.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-06-03
Weak lensing by large-scale structure is a powerful probe of cosmology and of
the dark universe. This cosmic shear technique relies on the accurate
measurement of the shapes and redshifts of background galaxies and requires
precise control of systematic errors. The Monte Carlo Control Loops (MCCL) is a
forward modelling method designed to tackle this problem. It relies on the
Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) to produce simulated images tuned to match
the target data statistically, followed by calibrations and tolerance loops. We
present the first end-to-end application of this method, on the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Year 1 wide field imaging data. We simultaneously measure the
shear power spectrum $C_{\ell}$ and the redshift distribution $n(z)$ of the
background galaxy sample. The method includes maps of the systematic sources,
Point Spread Function (PSF), an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC)
inference of the simulation model parameters, a shear calibration scheme, and
the fast estimation of the covariance matrix. We find a close statistical
agreement between the simulations and the DES Y1 data using an array of
diagnostics. In a non-tomographic setting, we derive a set of $C_\ell$ and
$n(z)$ curves that encode the cosmic shear measurement, as well as the
systematic uncertainty. Following a blinding scheme, we measure the combination
of $\Omega_m$, $\sigma_8$, and intrinsic alignment amplitude $A_{\rm{IA}}$,
defined as $S_8D_{\rm{IA}} = \sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}D_{\rm{IA}}$, where
$D_{\rm{IA}}=1-0.11(A_{\rm{IA}}-1)$. We find
$S_8D_{\rm{IA}}=0.895^{+0.054}_{-0.039}$, where systematics are at the level of
roughly 60\% of the statistical errors. We discuss these results in the context
of earlier cosmic shear analyses of the DES Y1 data. Our findings indicate that
this method and its fast runtime offer good prospects for cosmic shear
measurements with future wide-field surveys.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.07726 [pdf] - 1908604
On Model Selection in Cosmology
Submitted: 2019-01-23, last modified: 2019-05-10
We review some of the common methods for model selection: the goodness of
fit, the likelihood ratio test, Bayesian model selection using Bayes factors,
and the classical as well as the Bayesian information theoretic approaches. We
illustrate these different approaches by comparing models for the expansion
history of the Universe. In the discussion we highlight the premises and
objectives entering these different approaches to model selection and finally
recommend the information theoretic approach.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08042 [pdf] - 1971206
Mass Variance from Archival X-ray Properties of Dark Energy Survey
Year-1 Galaxy Clusters
Farahi, A.;
Chen, X.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Bhargava, S.;
Giles, P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Jeltema, T.;
Hilton, M.;
Bermeo, A.;
Mayers, J.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Collins, C.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantz, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Zhang, Y.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-03-19
Using archival X-ray observations and a log-normal population model, we
estimate constraints on the intrinsic scatter in halo mass at fixed optical
richness for a galaxy cluster sample identified in Dark Energy Survey Year-One
(DES-Y1) data with the redMaPPer algorithm. We examine the scaling behavior of
X-ray temperatures, $T_X$, with optical richness, $\lambda_{RM}$, for clusters
in the redshift range $0.2<z<0.7$. X-ray temperatures are obtained from Chandra
and XMM observations for 58 and 110 redMaPPer systems, respectively. Despite
non-uniform sky coverage, the $T_X$ measurements are $> 50\%$ complete for
clusters with $\lambda_{RM} > 130$. Regression analysis on the two samples
produces consistent posterior scaling parameters, from which we derive a
combined constraint on the residual scatter, $\sigma_{\ln Tx | \lambda} = 0.275
\pm 0.019$. Joined with constraints for $T_X$ scaling with halo mass from the
Weighing the Giants program and richness--temperature covariance estimates from
the LoCuSS sample, we derive the richness-conditioned scatter in mass,
$\sigma_{\ln M | \lambda} = 0.30 \pm 0.04\, _{({\rm stat})} \pm 0.09\, _{({\rm
sys})}$, at an optical richness of approximately 70. Uncertainties in external
parameters, particularly the slope and variance of the $T_X$--mass relation and
the covariance of $T_X$ and $\lambda_{RM}$ at fixed mass, dominate the
systematic error. The $95\%$ confidence region from joint sample analysis is
relatively broad, $\sigma_{\ln M | \lambda} \in [0.14, \, 0.55]$, or a factor
ten in variance.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.07812 [pdf] - 1830517
More out of less: an excess integrated Sachs-Wolfe signal from
supervoids mapped out by the Dark Energy Survey
Kovács, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Hamaus, N.;
Miranda, V.;
Nadathur, S.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruendl, R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, K.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-19, last modified: 2019-01-29
The largest structures in the cosmic web probe the dynamical nature of dark
energy through their integrated Sachs-Wolfe imprints. In the strength of the
signal, typical cosmic voids have shown good consistency with expectation
$A_{\rm ISW}=\Delta T^{\rm data} / \Delta T^{\rm theory}=1$, given the
substantial cosmic variance. Discordantly, large-scale hills in the
gravitational potential, or supervoids, have shown excess signals. In this
study, we mapped out 87 new supervoids in the total 5000 deg$^2$ footprint of
the Dark Energy Survey at $0.2<z<0.9$ to probe these anomalous claims. We found
an excess imprinted profile with $ A_{\rm ISW}\approx4.1\pm2.0$ amplitude. The
combination with independent BOSS data reveals an ISW imprint of supervoids at
the $3.3\sigma$ significance level with an enhanced $A_{\rm
ISW}\approx5.2\pm1.6$ amplitude. The tension with $\Lambda$CDM predictions is
equivalent to $2.6\sigma$ and remains unexplained.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06209 [pdf] - 1794662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic
Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Camacho, H.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chan, K. C.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manera, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-12-09
We present angular diameter distance measurements obtained by locating the
BAO scale in the distribution of galaxies selected from the first year of Dark
Energy Survey data. We consider a sample of over 1.3 million galaxies
distributed over a footprint of 1318 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1$ and
a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. This sample was selected, as
fully described in a companion paper, using a color/magnitude selection that
optimizes trade-offs between number density and redshift uncertainty. We
investigate the BAO signal in the projected clustering using three conventions,
the angular separation, the co-moving transverse separation, and spherical
harmonics. Further, we compare results obtained from template based and machine
learning photometric redshift determinations. We use 1800 simulations that
approximate our sample in order to produce covariance matrices and allow us to
validate our distance scale measurement methodology. We measure the angular
diameter distance, $D_A$, at the effective redshift of our sample divided by
the true physical scale of the BAO feature, $r_{\rm d}$. We obtain close to a 4
per cent distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff}=0.81)/r_{\rm d} = 10.75\pm
0.43 $. These results are consistent with the flat $\Lambda$CDM concordance
cosmological model supported by numerous other recent experimental results. All
data products are publicly available here:
https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y1a1/bao
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.09795 [pdf] - 1785791
DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using
simulated Dark Energy Surveys
MacCrann, N.;
DeRose, J.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Blazek, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Crocce, M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Jain, B.;
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gruen, D.;
Zuntz, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Prat, J.;
Wang, M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Busha, M. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Huterer, D.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-03-26, last modified: 2018-11-14
We use mock galaxy survey simulations designed to resemble the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data to validate and inform cosmological parameter
estimation. When similar analysis tools are applied to both simulations and
real survey data, they provide powerful validation tests of the DES Y1
cosmological analyses presented in companion papers. We use two suites of
galaxy simulations produced using different methods, which therefore provide
independent tests of our cosmological parameter inference. The cosmological
analysis we aim to validate is presented in DES Collaboration et al. (2017) and
uses angular two-point correlation functions of galaxy number counts and weak
lensing shear, as well as their cross-correlation, in multiple redshift bins.
While our constraints depend on the specific set of simulated realisations
available, for both suites of simulations we find that the input cosmology is
consistent with the combined constraints from multiple simulated DES Y1
realizations in the $\Omega_m-\sigma_8$ plane. For one of the suites, we are
able to show with high confidence that any biases in the inferred
$S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ and $\Omega_m$ are smaller than the DES Y1
$1-\sigma$ uncertainties. For the other suite, for which we have fewer
realizations, we are unable to be this conclusive; we infer a roughly 70%
probability that systematic biases in the recovered $\Omega_m$ and $S_8$ are
sub-dominant to the DES Y1 uncertainty. As cosmological analyses of this kind
become increasingly more precise, validation of parameter inference using
survey simulations will be essential to demonstrate robustness.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.09456 [pdf] - 1996667
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methods for Cluster Cosmology and
Application to the SDSS
Costanzi, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Simet, M.;
Zhang, Y.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Mantz, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Jeltema, T.;
Gruen, D.;
McClintock, S. Allen T.;
Romer, A. K.;
von der Linden, A.;
Farahi, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Giles, P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Bhargava, S.;
Bermeo-Hernandez, A.;
Chen, X.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2018-10-22
We perform the first blind analysis of cluster abundance data. Specifically,
we derive cosmological constraints from the abundance and weak-lensing signal
of \redmapper\ clusters of richness $\lambda\geq 20$ in the redshift range
$z\in[0.1,0.3]$ as measured in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We
simultaneously fit for cosmological parameters and the richness--mass relation
of the clusters. For a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model with massive
neutrinos, we find $S_8 \equiv
\sigma_{8}(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}=0.79^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$. This value is both
consistent and competitive with that derived from cluster catalogues selected
in different wavelengths. Our result is also consistent with the combined
probes analyses by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Kilo-Degree Survey
(KiDS), and with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies as measured
by \planck. We demonstrate that the cosmological posteriors are robust against
variation of the richness--mass relation model and to systematics associated
with the calibration of the selection function. In combination with Baryon
Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) data, we
constrain the Hubble rate to be $h=0.66\pm 0.02$, independent of the CMB.
Future work aimed at improving our understanding of the scatter of the
richness--mass relation has the potential to significantly improve the
precision of our cosmological posteriors. The methods described in this work
were developed for use in the forthcoming analysis of cluster abundances in the
DES. Our SDSS analysis constitutes the first part of a staged-unblinding
analysis of the full DES data set.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02441 [pdf] - 1945701
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1
galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing
Omori, Y.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Kirk, D.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Simard, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak
lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an
effective overlapping area of 1289 deg$^{2}$. With the combined measurements
from four source galaxy redshift bins, we reject the hypothesis of no lensing
with a significance of $10.8\sigma$. When employing angular scale cuts, this
significance is reduced to $6.8\sigma$, which remains the highest
signal-to-noise measurement of its kind to date. We fit the amplitude of the
correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial
$\Lambda$CDM model, finding $A = 0.99 \pm 0.17$. We additionally use the
correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias,
obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally,
when performing a cosmological analysis under the $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain
the marginalized constraints of $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.261^{+0.070}_{-0.051}$ and
$S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.660^{+0.085}_{-0.100}$.
These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies,
galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT and Planck data.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.05257 [pdf] - 1811023
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methodology and Projections for Joint
Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point
Functions
Baxter, E. J.;
Omori, Y.;
Chang, C.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Choi, A.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
Holder, G. P.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Nicola, A.;
Pandey, S.;
Prat, J.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-02-14, last modified: 2018-10-04
Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational
lensing-induced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) collaboration used a joint fit to two-point correlations between these
observables to place tight constraints on cosmology (DES Collaboration et al.
2017). In this work, we develop the methodology to extend the DES year one
joint probes analysis to include cross-correlations of the optical survey
observables with gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
as measured by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Using simulated
analyses, we show how the resulting set of five two-point functions increases
the robustness of the cosmological constraints to systematic errors in galaxy
lensing shear calibration. Additionally, we show that contamination of the
SPT+Planck CMB lensing map by the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect is a
potentially large source of systematic error for two-point function analyses,
but show that it can be reduced to acceptable levels in our analysis by masking
clusters of galaxies and imposing angular scale cuts on the two-point
functions. The methodology developed here will be applied to the analysis of
data from the DES, the SPT, and Planck in a companion work.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02322 [pdf] - 1924924
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering,
Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Knox, L.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Luong-Van, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Padin, S.;
Pandey, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pryke, C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zahn, O.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three
cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,
and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These
three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical
imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and
millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from
the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy
density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between
these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological
models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation
functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)
yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test
for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the
Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.
Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields
$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.
These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the
first year DES joint-probes analysis.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00039 [pdf] - 1767415
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of
redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shin, T.;
Melchior, P.;
DeRose, J.;
Seitz, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
von der Linden, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Mantz, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Allen, S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Farahi, A.;
Hamaus, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
Israel, H.;
Li, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Morris, G.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pollina, G.;
Rau, M. M.;
Simet, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-30, last modified: 2018-09-12
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}|\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=-0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semi-analytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halo--mass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01536 [pdf] - 1747811
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Avila, S.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sanchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Moller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
ONeill, C. R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-08-28
We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of large-scale structure and lensing
correlations. Two-point correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.06808 [pdf] - 1751714
The Splashback Feature around DES Galaxy Clusters: Galaxy Density and
Weak Lensing Profiles
Chang, C.;
Baxter, E.;
Jain, B.;
Sánchez, C.;
Adhikari, S.;
Varga, T. N.;
Fang, Y.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kim, A. G.;
Prat, J.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Palmese, A.;
Rapetti, D.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-18, last modified: 2018-07-31
Splashback refers to the process of matter that is accreting onto a dark
matter halo reaching its first orbital apocenter and turning around in its
orbit. The cluster-centric radius at which this process occurs, r_sp, defines a
halo boundary that is connected to the dynamics of the cluster. A rapid decline
in the halo profile is expected near r_sp. We measure the galaxy number density
and weak lensing mass profiles around redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the first
year Dark Energy Survey (DES) data. For a cluster sample with mean M_200m mass
~2.5 x 10^14 M_sun, we find strong evidence of a splashback-like steepening of
the galaxy density profile and measure r_sp=1.13 +/- 0.07 Mpc/h, consistent
with earlier SDSS measurements of More et al. (2016) and Baxter et al. (2017).
Moreover, our weak lensing measurement demonstrates for the first time the
existence of a splashback-like steepening of the matter profile of galaxy
clusters. We measure r_sp=1.34 +/- 0.21 Mpc/h from the weak lensing data, in
good agreement with our galaxy density measurements. For different cluster and
galaxy samples, we find that consistent with LCDM simulations, r_sp scales with
R_200m and does not evolve with redshift over the redshift range of 0.3--0.6.
We also find that potential systematic effects associated with the redMaPPer
algorithm may impact the location of r_sp. We discuss progress needed to
understand the systematic uncertainties and fully exploit forthcoming data from
DES and future surveys, emphasizing the importance of more realistic mock
catalogs and independent cluster samples.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05045 [pdf] - 1722433
Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and
lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Krause, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hilbert, S.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Prat, J.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-10-13, last modified: 2018-07-24
We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved large-scale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and counts-in-cells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
N-body simulation realizations and log-normal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear two-point functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07072 [pdf] - 1767527
Modeling projection effects in optically-selected cluster catalogues
Costanzi, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Farahi, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Mantz, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Mandelbaum, R.;
DeRose, J.;
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Zhang, Y.;
Weller, J.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Aguena, M.
Submitted: 2018-07-18
The cosmological utility of galaxy cluster catalogues is primarily limited by
our ability to calibrate the relation between halo mass and observable mass
proxies such as cluster richness, X-ray luminosity or the Sunyaev-Zeldovich
signal. Projection effects are a particularly pernicious systematic effect that
can impact observable mass proxies; structure along the line of sight can both
bias and increase the scatter of the observable mass proxies used in cluster
abundance studies. In this work, we develop an empirical method to characterize
the impact of projection effects on redMaPPer cluster catalogues. We use
numerical simulations to validate our method and illustrate its robustness. We
demonstrate that modeling of projection effects is a necessary component for
cluster abundance studies capable of reaching $\approx 5\%$ mass calibration
uncertainties (e.g. the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 sample). Specifically,
ignoring the impact of projection effects in the observable--mass relation ---
i.e. marginalizing over a log-normal model only --- biases the posterior of the
cluster normalization condition $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm
m}/0.3)^{1/2}$ by $\Delta S_8 =0.05$, more than twice the uncertainty in the
posterior for such an analysis.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.07400 [pdf] - 1871387
Joint halo mass function for modified gravity and massive neutrinos I:
simulations and cosmological forecasts
Submitted: 2018-06-19
We present a halo mass function accurate over the full relevant Hu-Sawicki
$f(R)$ parameter space based on spherical collapse calculations and calibrated
to a suite of modified gravity $N$-body simulations that include massive
neutrinos. We investigate the ability of current and forthcoming galaxy cluster
observations to detect deviations from general relativity while constraining
the total neutrino mass and including systematic uncertainties. Our results
indicate that the degeneracy between massive neutrino and modify gravity
effects is a limiting factor for the current searches for new gravitational
physics with clusters of galaxies, but future surveys will be able to break the
degeneracy.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.06860 [pdf] - 1897828
On the relative bias of void tracers in the Dark Energy Survey
Pollina, G.;
Hamaus, N.;
Paech, K.;
Dolag, K.;
Weller, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Jain, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2018-06-18
Luminous tracers of large-scale structure are not entirely representative of
the distribution of mass in our Universe. As they arise from the highest peaks
in the matter density field, the spatial distribution of luminous objects is
biased towards those peaks. On large scales, where density fluctuations are
mild, this bias simply amounts to a constant offset in the clustering amplitude
of the tracer, known as linear bias. In this work we focus on the relative bias
between galaxies and galaxy clusters that are located inside and in the
vicinity of cosmic voids, extended regions of relatively low density in the
large-scale structure of the Universe. With the help of hydro-dynamical
simulations we verify that the relation between galaxy and cluster overdensity
around voids remains linear. Hence, the void-centric density profiles of
different tracers can be linked by a single multiplicative constant. This
amounts to the same value as the relative linear bias between tracers for the
largest voids in the sample. For voids of small sizes, which typically arise in
higher density regions, this constant has a higher value, possibly showing an
environmental dependence similar to that observed for the linear bias itself.
We confirm our findings by analysing mocks and data obtained during the first
year of observations by the Dark Energy Survey. As a side product, we present
the first catalogue of three-dimensional voids extracted from a photometric
survey with a controlled photo-z uncertainty. Our results will be relevant in
forthcoming analyses that attempt to use voids as cosmological probes.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.00917 [pdf] - 1688564
Baryon Content in a Sample of 91 Galaxy Clusters Selected by the South
Pole Telescope at 0.2 < z < 1.25
Chiu, I.;
Mohr, J. J.;
McDonald, M.;
Bocquet, S.;
Desai, S.;
Klein, M.;
Israel, H.;
Ashby, M. L. N.;
Stanford, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Brodwin, M.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bayliss, M.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bleem, L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Bulbul, E.;
Capasso, R.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garmire, G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gonzalez, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, N.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hlavacek-L., J.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kraft, R.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Murray, S.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rapetti, D.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sharon, K.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stalder, B.;
Stern, C.;
Strazzullo, V.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-11-02, last modified: 2018-05-24
We estimate total mass ($M_{500}$), intracluster medium (ICM) mass
($M_{\mathrm{ICM}}$) and stellar mass ($M_{\star}$) in a Sunyaev-Zel'dovich
effect (SZE) selected sample of 91 galaxy clusters with masses
$M_{500}\gtrsim2.5\times10^{14}M_{\odot}$ and redshift $0.2 < z < 1.25$ from
the 2500 deg$^2$ South Pole Telescope SPT-SZ survey. The total masses $M_{500}$
are estimated from the SZE observable, the ICM masses $M_{\mathrm{ICM}}$ are
obtained from the analysis of $Chandra$ X-ray observations, and the stellar
masses $M_{\star}$ are derived by fitting spectral energy distribution
templates to Dark Energy Survey (DES) $griz$ optical photometry and $WISE$ or
$Spitzer$ near-infrared photometry. We study trends in the stellar mass, the
ICM mass, the total baryonic mass and the cold baryonic fraction with cluster
mass and redshift. We find significant departures from self-similarity in the
mass scaling for all quantities, while the redshift trends are all
statistically consistent with zero, indicating that the baryon content of
clusters at fixed mass has changed remarkably little over the past $\approx9$
Gyr. We compare our results to the mean baryon fraction (and the stellar mass
fraction) in the field, finding that these values lie above (below) those in
cluster virial regions in all but the most massive clusters at low redshift.
Using a simple model of the matter assembly of clusters from infalling groups
with lower masses and from infalling material from the low density environment
or field surrounding the parent halos, we show that the measured mass trends
without strong redshift trends in the stellar mass scaling relation could be
explained by a mass and redshift dependent fractional contribution from field
material. Similar analyses of the ICM and baryon mass scaling relations provide
evidence for the so-called "missing baryons" outside cluster virial regions.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01532 [pdf] - 1681410
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak
lensing source galaxies
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Rau, M. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Alarcon, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gatti, M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Mudd, D.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-11
We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensing-weighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z-\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30-band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, pre-seeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weak-lensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photo-z procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01538 [pdf] - 1747812
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic
Shear
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Zuntz, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Blazek, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Samuroff, S.;
Prat, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Davis, C.;
Ferté, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Amara, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Choi, A.;
De Vicente, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krawiec, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Peacock, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Stebbins, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-04-30
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state
$w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$ -- $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05162 [pdf] - 1716953
Density split statistics: joint model of counts and lensing in cells
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
McClintock, T.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Seitz, S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Hilbert, S.;
Jain, B.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-14, last modified: 2018-04-24
We present density split statistics, a framework that studies lensing and
counts-in-cells as a function of foreground galaxy density, thereby providing a
large-scale measurement of both 2-point and 3-point statistics. Our method
extends our earlier work on trough lensing and is summarized as follows: given
a foreground (low redshift) population of galaxies, we divide the sky into
subareas of equal size but distinct galaxy density. We then measure lensing
around uniformly spaced points separately in each of these subareas, as well as
counts-in-cells statistics (CiC). The lensing signals trace the matter density
contrast around regions of fixed galaxy density. Through the CiC measurements
this can be related to the density profile around regions of fixed matter
density. Together, these measurements constitute a powerful probe of cosmology,
the skewness of the density field and the connection of galaxies and matter.
In this paper we show how to model both the density split lensing signal and
CiC from basic ingredients: a non-linear power spectrum, clustering hierarchy
coefficients from perturbation theory and a parametric model for galaxy bias
and shot-noise. Using N-body simulations, we demonstrate that this model is
sufficiently accurate for a cosmological analysis on year 1 data from the Dark
Energy Survey.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01597 [pdf] - 1636571
Planck 2015 results. XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster
counts
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Weller, J.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2018-02-19
We present cluster counts and corresponding cosmological constraints from the
Planck full mission data set. Our catalogue consists of 439 clusters detected
via their Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) signal down to a signal-to-noise ratio of 6,
and is more than a factor of 2 larger than the 2013 Planck cluster cosmology
sample. The counts are consistent with those from 2013 and yield compatible
constraints under the same modelling assumptions. Taking advantage of the
larger catalogue, we extend our analysis to the two-dimensional distribution in
redshift and signal-to-noise. We use mass estimates from two recent studies of
gravitational lensing of background galaxies by Planck clusters to provide
priors on the hydrostatic bias parameter, $(1-b)$. In addition, we use lensing
of cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature fluctuations by Planck
clusters as an independent constraint on this parameter. These various
calibrations imply constraints on the present-day amplitude of matter
fluctuations in varying degrees of tension with those from the Planck analysis
of primary fluctuations in the CMB; for the lowest estimated values of $(1-b)$
the tension is mild, only a little over one standard deviation, while it
remains substantial ($3.7\,\sigma$) for the largest estimated value. We also
examine constraints on extensions to the base flat $\Lambda$CDM model by
combining the cluster and CMB constraints. The combination appears to favour
non-minimal neutrino masses, but this possibility does little to relieve the
overall tension because it simultaneously lowers the implied value of the
Hubble parameter, thereby exacerbating the discrepancy with most current
astrophysical estimates. Improving the precision of cluster mass calibrations
from the current 10%-level to 1% would significantly strengthen these combined
analyses and provide a stringent test of the base $\Lambda$CDM model.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.06748 [pdf] - 1589976
Evidence for Dynamically Driven Formation of the GW170817 Neutron Star
Binary in NGC 4993
Palmese, A.;
Hartley, W.;
Tarsitano, F.;
Conselice, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Lin, H.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Tucker, D.;
Brout, D.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Fruchter, A.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Herner, K.;
Levan, A. J.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Misra, K.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-18, last modified: 2017-11-13
We present a study of NGC 4993, the host galaxy of the GW170817 gravitational
wave event, the GRB170817A short gamma-ray burst (sGRB) and the AT2017gfo
kilonova. We use Dark Energy Camera imaging, AAT spectra and publicly available
data, relating our findings to binary neutron star (BNS) formation scenarios
and merger delay timescales. NGC4993 is a nearby (40 Mpc) early-type galaxy,
with $i$-band S\'ersic index $n=4.0$ and low asymmetry ($A=0.04\pm 0.01$).
These properties are unusual for sGRB hosts. However, NGC4993 presents
shell-like structures and dust lanes indicative of a recent galaxy merger, with
the optical transient located close to a shell. We constrain the star formation
history (SFH) of the galaxy assuming that the galaxy merger produced a star
formation burst, but find little to no on-going star formation in either
spatially-resolved broadband SED or spectral fitting. We use the best-fit SFH
to estimate the BNS merger rate in this type of galaxy, as $R_{NSM}^{gal}=
5.7^{+0.57}_{-3.3} \times 10^{-6} {\rm yr}^{-1}$. If star formation is the only
considered BNS formation scenario, the expected number of BNS mergers from
early-type galaxies detectable with LIGO during its first two observing seasons
is $0.038^{+0.004}_{-0.022}$, as opposed to $\sim 0.5$ from all galaxy types.
Hypothesizing that the binary system formed due to dynamical interactions
during the galaxy merger, the subsequent time elapsed can constrain the delay
time of the BNS coalescence. By using velocity dispersion estimates and the
position of the shells, we find that the galaxy merger occurred $t_{\rm
mer}\lesssim 200~{\rm Myr}$ prior to the BNS coalescence.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.00403 [pdf] - 1739830
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Measurement from DES Y1,
BAO, and D/H Data
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Henning, J. W.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Park, Y.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Reil, K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-11-01
We combine Dark Energy Survey Year 1 clustering and weak lensing data with
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN)
experiments to constrain the Hubble constant. Assuming a flat $\Lambda$CDM
model with minimal neutrino mass ($\sum m_\nu = 0.06$ eV) we find
$H_0=67.2^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$ km/s/Mpc (68% CL). This result is completely
independent of Hubble constant measurements based on the distance ladder,
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies (both temperature and
polarization), and strong lensing constraints. There are now five data sets
that: a) have no shared observational systematics; and b) each constrain the
Hubble constant with a few percent level precision. We compare these five
independent measurements, and find that, as a set, the differences between them
are significant at the $2.1\sigma$ level ($\chi^2/dof=20.1/11$, probability to
exceed=4%). This difference is low enough that we consider the data sets
statistically consistent with each other. The best fit Hubble constant obtained
by combining all five data sets is $H_0 = 69.1^{+0.4}_{-0.6}$ km/s/Mpc.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05459 [pdf] - 1589775
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical
Counterpart
Soares-Santos, M.;
Holz, D. E.;
Annis, J.;
Chornock, R.;
Herner, K.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Butler, R. E.;
Palmese, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Lin, H.;
Scolnic, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Neilsen, E.;
Marriner, J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Blanchard, P.;
Brown, D. A.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E. R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Durret, F.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S . S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hanna, C.;
Kasen, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Medina, G. E.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Muir, J.;
Nicholl, M.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stebbins, A.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) discovery of the optical
counterpart of the first binary neutron star merger detected through
gravitational wave emission, GW170817. Our observations commenced 10.5 hours
post-merger, as soon as the localization region became accessible from Chile.
We imaged 70 deg$^2$ in the $i$ and $z$ bands, covering 93\% of the initial
integrated localization probability, to a depth necessary to identify likely
optical counterparts (e.g., a kilonova). At 11.4 hours post-merger we detected
a bright optical transient located $10.6''$ from the nucleus of NGC\,4993 at
redshift $z=0.0098$, consistent (for $H_0 = 70$\, km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) with
the distance of $40 \pm 8$\, Mpc reported by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
and the Virgo Collaboration (LVC). At detection the transient had magnitudes
$i\approx 17.30$ and $z\approx 17.45$, and thus an absolute magnitude of $M_i =
-15.7$, in the luminosity range expected for a kilonova. We identified 1,500
potential transient candidates. Applying simple selection criteria aimed at
rejecting background events such as supernovae, we find the transient
associated with NGC\,4993 as the only remaining plausible counterpart, and
reject chance coincidence at the 99.5\% confidence level. We therefore conclude
that the optical counterpart we have identified near NGC\,4993 is associated
with GW170817. This discovery ushers in the era of multi-messenger astronomy
with gravitational waves, and demonstrates the power of DECam to identify the
optical counterparts of gravitational-wave sources.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05840 [pdf] - 1589828
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-IR Light Curves and Comparison
to Kilonova Models
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Villar, V. A.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.;
Chornock, R.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Fong, W.;
Margutti, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Butler, R. E.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drout, M. R.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Guillochon, J.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Neilsen,, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Palmese, A.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Smith, N.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Balbinot, E.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Cook, E. R.;
Durret, F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Medina, G. E.;
Muir, J.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wester, W.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present UV, optical, and NIR photometry of the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a gravitational wave source from Advanced LIGO/Virgo, the binary
neutron star merger GW170817. Our data set extends from the discovery of the
optical counterpart at $0.47$ days to $18.5$ days post-merger, and includes
observations with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), Gemini-South/FLAMINGOS-2
(GS/F2), and the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}). The spectral energy
distribution (SED) inferred from this photometry at $0.6$ days is well
described by a blackbody model with $T\approx 8300$ K, a radius of $R\approx
4.5\times 10^{14}$ cm (corresponding to an expansion velocity of $v\approx
0.3c$), and a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\approx 5\times10^{41}$ erg
s$^{-1}$. At $1.5$ days we find a multi-component SED across the optical and
NIR, and subsequently we observe rapid fading in the UV and blue optical bands
and significant reddening of the optical/NIR colors. Modeling the entire data
set we find that models with heating from radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni, or
those with only a single component of opacity from $r$-process elements, fail
to capture the rapid optical decline and red optical/NIR colors. Instead,
models with two components consistent with lanthanide-poor and lanthanide-rich
ejecta provide a good fit to the data, the resulting "blue" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.01$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.3$c, and the "red" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.04$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.1$c. These ejecta masses are broadly
consistent with the estimated $r$-process production rate required to explain
the Milky Way $r$-process abundances, providing the first evidence that BNS
mergers can be a dominant site of $r$-process enrichment.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00992 [pdf] - 1648618
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods
and Systematics Characterization
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Davis, C.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rau, M. M.;
DeRose, J.;
De Vicente, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hoyle, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.
Submitted: 2017-09-04
We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clustering-based method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we cross-correlate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo-$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo-$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forest-based photo-$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo-$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.06176 [pdf] - 1580431
On the linearity of tracer bias around voids
Submitted: 2016-10-19, last modified: 2017-08-23
The large-scale structure of the universe can only be observed via luminous
tracers of the dark matter. However, the clustering statistics of tracers are
biased and depend on various properties, such as their host-halo mass and
assembly history. On very large scales this tracer bias results in a constant
offset in the clustering amplitude, known as linear bias. Towards smaller
nonlinear scales, this is no longer the case and tracer bias becomes a
complicated function of scale and time. We focus on tracer bias centred on
cosmic voids, depressions of the density field that spatially dominate the
universe. We consider three types of tracers: galaxies, galaxy clusters and
AGN, extracted from the hydrodynamical simulation Magneticum Pathfinder. In
contrast to common clustering statistics that focus on auto-correlations of
tracers, we find that void-tracer cross-correlations are successfully described
by a linear-bias relation. The tracer-density profile of voids can thus be
related to their matter-density profile by a single number. We show that it
coincides with the linear tracer bias extracted from the large-scale
auto-correlation function and expectations from theory, if sufficiently large
voids are considered. For smaller voids we observe a shift towards higher
values. This has important consequences on cosmological parameter inference, as
the problem of unknown tracer bias is alleviated up to a constant number. The
smallest scales in existing datasets become accessible to simpler models,
providing numerous modes of the density field that have been disregarded so
far, but may help to further reduce statistical errors in constraining
cosmology.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.05328 [pdf] - 1583433
Multipole analysis of redshift-space distortions around cosmic voids
Submitted: 2017-05-15, last modified: 2017-07-11
We perform a comprehensive redshift-space distortion analysis based on cosmic
voids in the large-scale distribution of galaxies observed with the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey. To this end, we measure multipoles of the void-galaxy
cross-correlation function and compare them with standard model predictions in
cosmology. Merely considering linear-order theory allows us to accurately
describe the data on the entire available range of scales and to probe
void-centric distances down to about $2h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. Common systematics,
such as the Fingers-of-God effect, scale-dependent galaxy bias, and nonlinear
clustering do not seem to play a significant role in our analysis. We constrain
the growth rate of structure via the redshift-space distortion parameter
$\beta$ at two median redshifts, $\beta(\bar{z}=0.32)=0.599^{+0.134}_{-0.124}$
and $\beta(\bar{z}=0.54)=0.457^{+0.056}_{-0.054}$, with a precision that is
competitive with state-of-the-art galaxy-clustering results. While the
high-redshift constraint perfectly agrees with model expectations, we observe a
mild $2\sigma$ deviation at $\bar{z}=0.32$, which increases to $3\sigma$ when
the data is restricted to the lowest available redshift range of $0.15<z<0.33$.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.09359 [pdf] - 1585253
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated
Likelihood Analyses
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Zuntz, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Blazek, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
MacCrann, N.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Ferte, A.;
Kokron, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Miranda, V.;
Omori, Y.;
Porredon, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-06-28
We present the methodology for and detail the implementation of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) 3x2pt DES Year 1 (Y1) analysis, which combines
configuration-space two-point statistics from three different cosmological
probes: cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering, using data
from the first year of DES observations. We have developed two independent
modeling pipelines and describe the code validation process. We derive
expressions for analytical real-space multi-probe covariances, and describe
their validation with numerical simulations. We stress-test the inference
pipelines in simulated likelihood analyses that vary 6-7 cosmology parameters
plus 20 nuisance parameters and precisely resemble the analysis to be presented
in the DES 3x2pt analysis paper, using a variety of simulated input data
vectors with varying assumptions.
We find that any disagreement between pipelines leads to changes in assigned
likelihood $\Delta \chi^2 \le 0.045$ with respect to the statistical error of
the DES Y1 data vector. We also find that angular binning and survey mask do
not impact our analytic covariance at a significant level. We determine lower
bounds on scales used for analysis of galaxy clustering (8 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) and
galaxy-galaxy lensing (12 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) such that the impact of modeling
uncertainties in the non-linear regime is well below statistical errors, and
show that our analysis choices are robust against a variety of systematics.
These tests demonstrate that we have a robust analysis pipeline that yields
unbiased cosmological parameter inferences for the flagship 3x2pt DES Y1
analysis. We emphasize that the level of independent code development and
subsequent code comparison as demonstrated in this paper is necessary to
produce credible constraints from increasingly complex multi-probe analyses of
current data.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.04516 [pdf] - 1935364
Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Survey requirements and mission
design
Delabrouille, J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Achúcarro, A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Allison, R.;
Arroja, F.;
Artal, E.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Banerji, R.;
Barbosa, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Baselmans, J. J. A.;
Basu, K.;
Battistelli, E. S.;
Battye, R.;
Baumann, D.;
Benoît, A.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bideaud, A.;
Biesiada, M.;
Bilicki, M.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonato, M.;
Borrill, J.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brinckmann, T.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Buzzelli, A.;
Cabass, G.;
Cai, Z. -Y.;
Calvo, M.;
Caputo, A.;
Carvalho, C. -S.;
Casas, F. J.;
Castellano, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Charles, I.;
Chluba, J.;
Clements, D. L.;
Clesse, S.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colantoni, I.;
Contreras, D.;
Coppolecchia, A.;
Crook, M.;
D'Alessandro, G.;
D'Amico, G.;
da Silva, A.;
de Avillez, M.;
de Gasperis, G.;
De Petris, M.;
de Zotti, G.;
Danese, L.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Desjacques, V.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doyle, S.;
Durrer, R.;
Dvorkin, C.;
Eriksen, H. -K.;
Errard, J.;
Feeney, S.;
Fernández-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Franceschet, C.;
Fuskeland, U.;
Galli, S.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gomez, A.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Grandis, S.;
Greenslade, J.;
Goupy, J.;
Hagstotz, S.;
Hanany, S.;
Handley, W.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Hervias-Caimapo, C.;
Hills, M.;
Hindmarsh, M.;
Hivon, E.;
Hoang, D. T.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Hu, B.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamagna, L.;
Lapi, A.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Brun, A. M. C. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lizarraga, J.;
Luzzi, G.;
Macìas-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Martin, S.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Martins, C. J. A. P.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McCarthy, D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mennella, A.;
Mohr, J.;
Molinari, D.;
Monfardini, A.;
Montier, L.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Notari, A.;
Noviello, F.;
Oppizzi, F.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Pagano, L.;
Paiella, A.;
Pajer, E.;
Paoletti, D.;
Paradiso, S.;
Partridge, R. B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patil, S. P.;
Perdereau, O.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pisano, G.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Pollo, A.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Poulin, V.;
Prêle, D.;
Quartin, M.;
Ravenni, A.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ringeval, C.;
Roest, D.;
Roman, M.;
Roukema, B. F.;
Rubino-Martin, J. -A.;
Salvati, L.;
Scott, D.;
Serjeant, S.;
Signorelli, G.;
Starobinsky, A. A.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Tan, C. Y.;
Tartari, A.;
Tasinato, G.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torrado, J.;
Tramonte, D.;
Trappe, N.;
Triqueneaux, S.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tucker, C.;
Urrestilla, J.;
Väliviita, J.;
Van de Weygaert, R.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vennin, V.;
Verde, L.;
Vermeulen, G.;
Vielva, P.;
Vittorio, N.;
Voisin, F.;
Wallis, C.;
Wandelt, B.;
Wehus, I.;
Weller, J.;
Young, K.;
Zannoni, M.
Submitted: 2017-06-14
Future observations of cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarisation have
the potential to answer some of the most fundamental questions of modern
physics and cosmology. In this paper, we list the requirements for a future CMB
polarisation survey addressing these scientific objectives, and discuss the
design drivers of the CORE space mission proposed to ESA in answer to the "M5"
call for a medium-sized mission. The rationale and options, and the
methodologies used to assess the mission's performance, are of interest to
other future CMB mission design studies. CORE is designed as a near-ultimate
CMB polarisation mission which, for optimal complementarity with ground-based
observations, will perform the observations that are known to be essential to
CMB polarisation scienceand cannot be obtained by any other means than a
dedicated space mission.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05552 [pdf] - 1572642
Cosmology from Cosmic Shear with DES Science Verification Data
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bacon, D.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Bruderer, C.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Erickson, B.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Hirsch, M.;
Honscheid, K.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Kwan, J.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Refregier, A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rowe, B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sabiu, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sako, M.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Seo, H.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2017-05-03
We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science
Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV data, which is less
than 3\% of the full DES survey area. Using cosmic shear 2-point measurements
over three redshift bins we find $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.81
\pm 0.06$ (68\% confidence), after marginalising over 7 systematics parameters
and 3 other cosmological parameters. We examine the robustness of our results
to the choice of data vector and systematics assumed, and find them to be
stable. About $20$\% of our error bar comes from marginalising over shear and
photometric redshift calibration uncertainties. The current state-of-the-art
cosmic shear measurements from CFHTLenS are mildly discrepant with the
cosmological constraints from Planck CMB data; our results are consistent with
both datasets. Our uncertainties are $\sim$30\% larger than those from CFHTLenS
when we carry out a comparable analysis of the two datasets, which we attribute
largely to the lower number density of our shear catalogue. We investigate
constraints on dark energy and find that, with this small fraction of the full
survey, the DES SV constraints make negligible impact on the Planck
constraints. The moderate disagreement between the CFHTLenS and Planck values
of $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ is present regardless of the value of
$w$.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.06890 [pdf] - 1580445
Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark
Energy Survey Science Verification data
Melchior, P.;
Gruen, D.;
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Sheldon, E.;
Rozo, E.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Clampitt, J.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kacprzak, T.;
MacCrann, N.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Saro, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-10-21, last modified: 2017-04-28
We use weak-lensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of
optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification
data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer
clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq
\lambda \leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass
density contrast profiles with a model that accounts for seven distinct sources
of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors;
cluster-member contamination; miscentering; deviations from the NFW halo
profile; halo triaxiality; and line-of-sight projections. We combine the
inferred cluster masses to estimate the joint scaling relation between mass,
richness and redshift, $\mathcal{M}(\lambda,z) \varpropto M_0 \lambda^{F}
(1+z)^{G}$. We find $M_0 \equiv \langle
M_{200\mathrm{m}}\,|\,\lambda=30,z=0.5\rangle=\left[ 2.35 \pm 0.22\ \rm{(stat)}
\pm 0.12\ \rm{(sys)} \right] \cdot 10^{14}\ M_\odot$, with $F =
1.12\,\pm\,0.20\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.06\ \rm{(sys)}$ and $G = 0.18\,\pm\,
0.75\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.24\ \rm{(sys)}$. The amplitude of the mass-richness
relation is in excellent agreement with the weak-lensing calibration of
redMaPPer clusters in SDSS by Simet et al. (2016) and with the Saro et al.
(2015) calibration based on abundance matching of SPT-detected clusters. Our
results extend the redshift range over which the mass-richness relation of
redMaPPer clusters has been calibrated with weak lensing from $z\leq 0.3$ to
$z\leq0.8$. Calibration uncertainties of shear measurements and photometric
redshift estimates dominate our systematic error budget and require substantial
improvements for forthcoming studies.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10456 [pdf] - 1935351
Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Cluster Science
Melin, J. -B.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Hagstotz, S.;
Diego, J. M.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Luzzi, G.;
Martins, C. J. A. P.;
Grandis, S.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Ferraro, S.;
Tramonte, D.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Macìas-Pérez, J. F.;
Achúcarro, A.;
Ade, P.;
Allison, R.;
Ashdown, M.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Banerji, R.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Baselmans, J.;
Basu, K.;
Battye, R. A.;
Baumann, D.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bonato, M.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brinckmann, T.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Buzzelli, A.;
Cai, Z. -Y.;
Calvo, M.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Castellano, M. G.;
Challinor, A.;
Chluba, J.;
Clesse, S.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colantoni, I.;
Coppolecchia, A.;
Crook, M.;
D'Alessandro, G.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
De Petris, M.;
De Zotti, G.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Errard, J.;
Feeney, S. M.;
Fernández-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Galli, S.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Greenslade, J.;
Hanany, S.;
Handley, W.;
Hervias-Caimapo, C.;
Hills, M.;
Hivon, E.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamagna, L.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Brun, A. M. C. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Maffei, B.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
McCarthy, D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Molinari, D.;
Monfardini, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Notari, A.;
Paiella, A.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Piat, M.;
Pisano, G.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Pollo, A.;
Poulin, V.;
Quartin, M.;
Roman, M.;
Salvati, L.;
Tartari, A.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trappe, N.;
Triqueneaux, S.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucker, C.;
Väliviita, J.;
van de Weygaert, R.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vennin, V.;
Vielva, P.;
Vittorio, N.;
Weller, J.;
Young, K.;
Zannoni, M.
Submitted: 2017-03-30
We examine the cosmological constraints that can be achieved with a galaxy
cluster survey with the future CORE space mission. Using realistic simulations
of the millimeter sky, produced with the latest version of the Planck Sky
Model, we characterize the CORE cluster catalogues as a function of the main
mission performance parameters. We pay particular attention to telescope size,
key to improved angular resolution, and discuss the comparison and the
complementarity of CORE with ambitious future ground-based CMB experiments that
could be deployed in the next decade. A possible CORE mission concept with a
150 cm diameter primary mirror can detect of the order of 50,000 clusters
through the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect (SZE). The total yield increases
(decreases) by 25% when increasing (decreasing) the mirror diameter by 30 cm.
The 150 cm telescope configuration will detect the most massive clusters
($>10^{14}\, M_\odot$) at redshift $z>1.5$ over the whole sky, although the
exact number above this redshift is tied to the uncertain evolution of the
cluster SZE flux-mass relation; assuming self-similar evolution, CORE will
detect $\sim 500$ clusters at redshift $z>1.5$. This changes to 800 (200) when
increasing (decreasing) the mirror size by 30 cm. CORE will be able to measure
individual cluster halo masses through lensing of the cosmic microwave
background anisotropies with a 1-$\sigma$ sensitivity of $4\times10^{14}
M_\odot$, for a 120 cm aperture telescope, and $10^{14} M_\odot$ for a 180 cm
one. [abridged]
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.02018 [pdf] - 1580820
Cross-correlation of galaxies and galaxy clusters in the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey and the importance of non-Poissonian shot noise
Submitted: 2016-12-06
We present measurements of angular cross power spectra between galaxies and
optically-selected galaxy clusters in the final photometric sample of the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We measure the auto- and cross-correlations between
galaxy and cluster samples, from which we extract the effective biases and
study the shot noise properties. We model the non-Poissonian shot noise by
introducing an effective number density of tracers and fit for this quantity.
We find that we can only describe the cross-correlation of galaxies and galaxy
clusters, as well as the auto-correlation of galaxy clusters, on the relevant
scales using a non-Poissonian shot noise contribution.
The values of effective bias we finally measure for a volume-limited sample
are $b_{cc}=4.09 \pm 0.47$ for the cluster auto-correlation and $b_{gc}=2.15
\pm 0.09$ for the galaxy-cluster cross-correlation. We find that these results
are consistent with expectations from the auto-correlations of galaxies and
clusters and are in good agreement with previous studies. The main result is
two-fold: firstly we provide a measurement of the cross-correlation of galaxies
and clusters, which can be used for further cosmological analysis, and secondly
we describe an effective treatment of the shot noise.
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.03982 [pdf] - 1503913
Cosmic Voids and Void Lensing in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification Data
Sánchez, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Kovacs, A.;
Jain, B.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Nadathur, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Hamaus, N.;
Huterer, D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Amara, A.;
Bonnett, C.;
DeRose, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
Miquel, R.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-05-12, last modified: 2016-10-21
Galaxies and their dark matter halos populate a complicated filamentary
network around large, nearly empty regions known as cosmic voids. Cosmic voids
are usually identified in spectroscopic galaxy surveys, where 3D information
about the large-scale structure of the Universe is available. Although an
increasing amount of photometric data is being produced, its potential for void
studies is limited since photometric redshifts induce line-of-sight position
errors of $\sim50$ Mpc/$h$ or more that can render many voids undetectable. In
this paper we present a new void finder designed for photometric surveys,
validate it using simulations, and apply it to the high-quality photo-$z$
redMaGiC galaxy sample of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES-SV)
data. The algorithm works by projecting galaxies into 2D slices and finding
voids in the smoothed 2D galaxy density field of the slice. Fixing the
line-of-sight size of the slices to be at least twice the photo-$z$ scatter,
the number of voids found in these projected slices of simulated spectroscopic
and photometric galaxy catalogs is within 20% for all transverse void sizes,
and indistinguishable for the largest voids of radius $\sim 70$ Mpc/$h$ and
larger. The positions, radii, and projected galaxy profiles of photometric
voids also accurately match the spectroscopic void sample. Applying the
algorithm to the DES-SV data in the redshift range $0.2<z<0.8$, we identify 87
voids with comoving radii spanning the range 18-120 Mpc/$h$, and carry out a
stacked weak lensing measurement. With a significance of $4.4\sigma$, the
lensing measurement confirms the voids are truly underdense in the matter field
and hence not a product of Poisson noise, tracer density effects or systematics
in the data. It also demonstrates, for the first time in real data, the
viability of void lensing studies in photometric surveys.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04538 [pdf] - 1477626
A DECam Search for an Optical Counterpart to the LIGO Gravitational Wave
Event GW151226
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chornock, R.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fox, D. B.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Lin, H.;
Margutti, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Neilsen, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, N.;
Sobreira, F.;
Strampelli, G. M.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-06-14, last modified: 2016-09-08
We report the results of a Dark Energy Camera (DECam) optical follow-up of
the gravitational wave (GW) event GW151226, discovered by the Advanced LIGO
detectors. Our observations cover 28.8 deg$^2$ of the localization region in
the $i$ and $z$ bands (containing 3% of the BAYESTAR localization probability),
starting 10 hours after the event was announced and spanning four epochs at
$2-24$ days after the GW detection. We achieve $5\sigma$ point-source limiting
magnitudes of $i\approx21.7$ and $z\approx21.5$, with a scatter of $0.4$ mag,
in our difference images. Given the two day delay, we search this area for a
rapidly declining optical counterpart with $\gtrsim 3\sigma$ significance
steady decline between the first and final observations. We recover four
sources that pass our selection criteria, of which three are cataloged AGN. The
fourth source is offset by $5.8$ arcsec from the center of a galaxy at a
distance of 187 Mpc, exhibits a rapid decline by $0.5$ mag over $4$ days, and
has a red color of $i-z\approx 0.3$ mag. These properties roughly match the
expectations for a kilonova. However, this source was detected several times,
starting $94$ days prior to GW151226, in the Pan-STARRS Survey for Transients
(dubbed as PS15cdi) and is therefore unrelated to the GW event. Given its
long-term behavior, PS15cdi is likely a Type IIP supernova that transitioned
out of its plateau phase during our observations, mimicking a kilonova-like
behavior. We comment on the implications of this detection for contamination in
future optical follow-up observations.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.01784 [pdf] - 1472880
Constraints on Cosmology and Gravity from the Dynamics of Voids
Submitted: 2016-02-04, last modified: 2016-08-31
The Universe is mostly composed of large and relatively empty domains known
as cosmic voids, whereas its matter content is predominantly distributed along
their boundaries. The remaining material inside them, either dark or luminous
matter, is attracted to these boundaries and causes voids to expand faster and
to grow emptier over time. Using the distribution of galaxies centered on voids
identified in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and adopting minimal assumptions on
the statistical motion of these galaxies, we constrain the average matter
content $\Omega_\mathrm{m}=0.281\pm0.031$ in the Universe today, as well as the
linear growth rate of structure $f/b=0.417\pm0.089$ at median redshift
$\bar{z}=0.57$, where $b$ is the galaxy bias ($68\%$ C.L.). These values
originate from a percent-level measurement of the anisotropic distortion in the
void-galaxy cross-correlation function, $\varepsilon = 1.003\pm0.012$, and are
robust to consistency tests with bootstraps of the data and simulated mock
catalogs within an additional systematic uncertainty of half that size. They
surpass (and are complementary to) existing constraints by unlocking
cosmological information on smaller scales through an accurate model of
nonlinear clustering and dynamics in void environments. As such, our analysis
furnishes a powerful probe of deviations from Einstein's general relativity in
the low-density regime which has largely remained untested so far. We find no
evidence for such deviations in the data at hand.
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00329 [pdf] - 1516249
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Aleksic, J.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brunner, R. J.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Caminha, G. B.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlsen, J.;
Carnero-Rosell, A.;
Carollo, M.;
Carrasco-Kind, M.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Clerkin, L.;
Collett, T.;
Conselice, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Estrada, J.;
Etherington, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fabbri, J.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Rosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Guarnieri, P.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Jouvel, S.;
Kessler, R.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
Maraston, C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Merson, A.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morice-Atkinson, X.;
Naidoo, K.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Ostrovski, F.;
Palmese, A.;
Papadopoulos, A.;
Peiris, H.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reed, S. L.;
Refregier, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Soumagnac, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Whiteway, L.;
Wilcox, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2016-01-03, last modified: 2016-08-19
This overview article describes the legacy prospect and discovery potential
of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) beyond cosmological studies, illustrating it
with examples from the DES early data. DES is using a wide-field camera (DECam)
on the 4m Blanco Telescope in Chile to image 5000 sq deg of the sky in five
filters (grizY). By its completion the survey is expected to have generated a
catalogue of 300 million galaxies with photometric redshifts and 100 million
stars. In addition, a time-domain survey search over 27 sq deg is expected to
yield a sample of thousands of Type Ia supernovae and other transients. The
main goals of DES are to characterise dark energy and dark matter, and to test
alternative models of gravity; these goals will be pursued by studying large
scale structure, cluster counts, weak gravitational lensing and Type Ia
supernovae. However, DES also provides a rich data set which allows us to study
many other aspects of astrophysics. In this paper we focus on additional
science with DES, emphasizing areas where the survey makes a difference with
respect to other current surveys. The paper illustrates, using early data (from
`Science Verification', and from the first, second and third seasons of
observations), what DES can tell us about the solar system, the Milky Way,
galaxy evolution, quasars, and other topics. In addition, we show that if the
cosmological model is assumed to be Lambda+ Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) then
important astrophysics can be deduced from the primary DES probes. Highlights
from DES early data include the discovery of 34 Trans Neptunian Objects, 17
dwarf satellites of the Milky Way, one published z > 6 quasar (and more
confirmed) and two published superluminous supernovae (and more confirmed).
[64]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.03904 [pdf] - 1442670
Detection of the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect with DES Year 1 and
SPT
Soergel, B.;
Flender, S.;
Story, K. T.;
Bleem, L.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Rykoff, E.;
Benson, B. A.;
Crawford, T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Habib, S.;
Heitmann, K.;
Holder, G.;
Jain, B.;
Rozo, E.;
Saro, A.;
Weller, J.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Armstrong, R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Chiu, I.;
Chown, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Keisler, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McDonald, M.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Omori, Y.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rapetti, D.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Saliwanchik, B. R.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stark, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Whitehorn, N.
Submitted: 2016-03-12, last modified: 2016-07-25
We detect the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) effect with a statistical
significance of $4.2 \sigma$ by combining a cluster catalogue derived from the
first year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) with CMB temperature maps from
the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SPT-SZ) Survey. This measurement
is performed with a differential statistic that isolates the pairwise kSZ
signal, providing the first detection of the large-scale, pairwise motion of
clusters using redshifts derived from photometric data. By fitting the pairwise
kSZ signal to a theoretical template we measure the average central optical
depth of the cluster sample, $\bar{\tau}_e = (3.75 \pm 0.89)\cdot 10^{-3}$. We
compare the extracted signal to realistic simulations and find good agreement
with respect to the signal-to-noise, the constraint on $\bar{\tau}_e$, and the
corresponding gas fraction. High-precision measurements of the pairwise kSZ
signal with future data will be able to place constraints on the baryonic
physics of galaxy clusters, and could be used to probe gravity on scales $
\gtrsim 100$ Mpc.
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.06294 [pdf] - 1443823
Stacking for machine learning redshifts applied to SDSS galaxies
Submitted: 2016-02-19, last modified: 2016-06-16
We present an analysis of a general machine learning technique called
'stacking' for the estimation of photometric redshifts. Stacking techniques can
feed the photometric redshift estimate, as output by a base algorithm, back
into the same algorithm as an additional input feature in a subsequent learning
round. We shown how all tested base algorithms benefit from at least one
additional stacking round (or layer). To demonstrate the benefit of stacking,
we apply the method to both unsupervised machine learning techniques based on
self-organising maps (SOMs), and supervised machine learning methods based on
decision trees. We explore a range of stacking architectures, such as the
number of layers and the number of base learners per layer. Finally we explore
the effectiveness of stacking even when using a successful algorithm such as
AdaBoost. We observe a significant improvement of between 1.9% and 21% on all
computed metrics when stacking is applied to weak learners (such as SOMs and
decision trees). When applied to strong learning algorithms (such as AdaBoost)
the ratio of improvement shrinks, but still remains positive and is between
0.4% and 2.5% for the explored metrics and comes at almost no additional
computational cost.
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.08214 [pdf] - 1423613
Anomaly detection for machine learning redshifts applied to SDSS
galaxies
Submitted: 2015-03-27, last modified: 2016-06-15
We present an analysis of anomaly detection for machine learning redshift
estimation. Anomaly detection allows the removal of poor training examples,
which can adversely influence redshift estimates. Anomalous training examples
may be photometric galaxies with incorrect spectroscopic redshifts, or galaxies
with one or more poorly measured photometric quantity. We select 2.5 million
'clean' SDSS DR12 galaxies with reliable spectroscopic redshifts, and 6730
'anomalous' galaxies with spectroscopic redshift measurements which are flagged
as unreliable. We contaminate the clean base galaxy sample with galaxies with
unreliable redshifts and attempt to recover the contaminating galaxies using
the Elliptical Envelope technique. We then train four machine learning
architectures for redshift analysis on both the contaminated sample and on the
preprocessed 'anomaly-removed' sample and measure redshift statistics on a
clean validation sample generated without any preprocessing. We find an
improvement on all measured statistics of up to 80% when training on the
anomaly removed sample as compared with training on the contaminated sample for
each of the machine learning routines explored. We further describe a method to
estimate the contamination fraction of a base data sample.
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.06280 [pdf] - 1423622
Tuning target selection algorithms to improve galaxy redshift estimates
Submitted: 2015-08-25, last modified: 2016-06-15
We showcase machine learning (ML) inspired target selection algorithms to
determine which of all potential targets should be selected first for
spectroscopic follow up. Efficient target selection can improve the ML redshift
uncertainties as calculated on an independent sample, while requiring less
targets to be observed. We compare the ML targeting algorithms with the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) target order, and with a random targeting algorithm.
The ML inspired algorithms are constructed iteratively by estimating which of
the remaining target galaxies will be most difficult for the machine learning
methods to accurately estimate redshifts using the previously observed data.
This is performed by predicting the expected redshift error and redshift offset
(or bias) of all of the remaining target galaxies. We find that the predicted
values of bias and error are accurate to better than 10-30% of the true values,
even with only limited training sample sizes. We construct a hypothetical
follow-up survey and find that some of the ML targeting algorithms are able to
obtain the same redshift predictive power with 2-3 times less observing time,
as compared to that of the SDSS, or random, target selection algorithms. The
reduction in the required follow up resources could allow for a change to the
follow-up strategy, for example by obtaining deeper spectroscopy, which could
improve ML redshift estimates for deeper test data.
[68]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.00180 [pdf] - 1682434
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
Amendola, Luca;
Appleby, Stephen;
Avgoustidis, Anastasios;
Bacon, David;
Baker, Tessa;
Baldi, Marco;
Bartolo, Nicola;
Blanchard, Alain;
Bonvin, Camille;
Borgani, Stefano;
Branchini, Enzo;
Burrage, Clare;
Camera, Stefano;
Carbone, Carmelita;
Casarini, Luciano;
Cropper, Mark;
de Rham, Claudia;
Dietrich, Joerg P.;
Di Porto, Cinzia;
Durrer, Ruth;
Ealet, Anne;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Finelli, Fabio;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Guzzo, Luigi;
Heavens, Alan;
Heisenberg, Lavinia;
Heymans, Catherine;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Hollenstein, Lukas;
Holmes, Rory;
Horst, Ole;
Hwang, Zhiqi;
Jahnke, Knud;
Kitching, Thomas D.;
Koivisto, Tomi;
Kunz, Martin;
La Vacca, Giuseppe;
Linder, Eric;
March, Marisa;
Marra, Valerio;
Martins, Carlos;
Majerotto, Elisabetta;
Markovic, Dida;
Marsh, David;
Marulli, Federico;
Massey, Richard;
Mellier, Yannick;
Montanari, Francesco;
Mota, David F.;
Nunes, Nelson J.;
Percival, Will;
Pettorino, Valeria;
Porciani, Cristiano;
Quercellini, Claudia;
Read, Justin;
Rinaldi, Massimiliano;
Sapone, Domenico;
Sawicki, Ignacy;
Scaramella, Roberto;
Skordis, Constantinos;
Simpson, Fergus;
Taylor, Andy;
Thomas, Shaun;
Trotta, Roberto;
Verde, Licia;
Vernizzi, Filippo;
Vollmer, Adrian;
Wang, Yun;
Weller, Jochen;
Zlosnik, Tom
Submitted: 2016-06-01
Euclid is a European Space Agency medium class mission selected for launch in
2020 within the Cosmic Vision 2015 2025 program. The main goal of Euclid is to
understand the origin of the accelerated expansion of the universe. Euclid will
explore the expansion history of the universe and the evolution of cosmic
structures by measuring shapes and redshifts of galaxies as well as the
distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky. Although
the main driver for Euclid is the nature of dark energy, Euclid science covers
a vast range of topics, from cosmology to galaxy evolution to planetary
research. In this review we focus on cosmology and fundamental physics, with a
strong emphasis on science beyond the current standard models. We discuss five
broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial
conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data
analysis. This review has been planned and carried out within Euclid's Theory
Working Group and is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that
will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid
mission.
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05040 [pdf] - 1470597
Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey
Science Verification data
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Amara, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Marian, L.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Suchyta, E.;
Aleksić, J.;
Bacon, D.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Chang, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Hartley, W.;
Huff, E. M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Melchior, P.;
Nicola, A.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-03-16
Shear peak statistics has gained a lot of attention recently as a practical
alternative to the two point statistics for constraining cosmological
parameters. We perform a shear peak statistics analysis of the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data, using weak gravitational lensing
measurements from a 139 deg$^2$ field. We measure the abundance of peaks
identified in aperture mass maps, as a function of their signal-to-noise ratio,
in the signal-to-noise range $0<\mathcal S / \mathcal N<4$. To predict the peak
counts as a function of cosmological parameters we use a suite of $N$-body
simulations spanning 158 models with varying $\Omega_{\rm m}$ and $\sigma_8$,
fixing $w = -1$, $\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.04$, $h = 0.7$ and $n_s=1$, to which we
have applied the DES SV mask and redshift distribution. In our fiducial
analysis we measure $\sigma_{8}(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.6}=0.77 \pm 0.07$, after
marginalising over the shear multiplicative bias and the error on the mean
redshift of the galaxy sample. We introduce models of intrinsic alignments,
blending, and source contamination by cluster members. These models indicate
that peaks with $\mathcal S / \mathcal N>4$ would require significant
corrections, which is why we do not include them in our analysis. We compare
our results to the cosmological constraints from the two point analysis on the
SV field and find them to be in good agreement in both the central value and
its uncertainty. We discuss prospects for future peak statistics analysis with
upcoming DES data.
[70]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04199 [pdf] - 1418778
A Dark Energy Camera Search for Missing Supergiants in the LMC After the
Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Annis, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Chornock, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, N.;
Sobreira, F.;
Walker, A. R.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Fischer, J.;
Fong, W.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fox, D. B.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Karliner, I.;
Kasen, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Ogando, R.;
Peoples, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Quataert, E.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Stebbins, A.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2016-02-12, last modified: 2016-02-18
The collapse of the core of a star is expected to produce gravitational
radiation. While this process will usually produce a luminous supernova, the
optical signatue could be subluminous and a direct collapse to a black hole,
with the star just disappearing, is possible. The gravitational wave event
GW150914 reported by the LIGO Virgo Collaboration (LVC) on 2015 September 16,
was detected by a burst analysis and whose high probability spatial
localization included the Large Magellanic Cloud. Shortly after the
announcement of the event, we used the Dark Energy Camera to observe 102
deg$^2$ of the localization area, including a 38 deg$^2$ area centered on the
LMC. Using a catalog of 152 LMC luminous red supergiants, candidates to undergo
a core collapse without a visible supernova, we find that the positions of 144
of these are inside our images, and that all are detected - none have
disappeared. There are other classes of candidates: we searched existing
catalogs of red supergiants, yellow supergiants, Wolf-Rayet stars, and luminous
blue variable stars, recovering all that were inside the imaging area. Based on
our observations, we conclude that it is unlikely that GW150914 was caused by
the core collapse of a supergiant in the LMC, consistent with the LIGO
Collaboration analyses of the gravitational wave form as best described by a
binary black hole merger. We discuss how to generalize this search for future
very nearby core collapse candidates.
[71]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04198 [pdf] - 1418777
A Dark Energy Camera Search for an Optical Counterpart to the First
Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Soares-Santos, M.;
Kessler, R.;
Berger, E.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Chen, H.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sobreira, F.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brown, D. A.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Chornock, R.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drout, M. R.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fernandez, E.;
Fischer, J.;
Fong, W.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fox, D. B.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Karliner, I.;
Kasen, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Margutti, R.;
Martini, P.;
Matheson, T.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Peoples, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Quataert, E.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, N.;
Smith, R. C.;
Stebbins, A.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-02-12, last modified: 2016-02-18
We report initial results of a deep search for an optical counterpart to the
gravitational wave event GW150914, the first trigger from the Advanced LIGO
gravitational wave detectors. We used the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) to image a
102 deg$^2$ area, corresponding to 38% of the initial trigger high-probability
sky region and to 11% of the revised high-probability region. We observed in i
and z bands at 4-5, 7, and 24 days after the trigger. The median $5\sigma$
point-source limiting magnitudes of our search images are i=22.5 and z=21.8
mag. We processed the images through a difference-imaging pipeline using
templates from pre-existing Dark Energy Survey data and publicly available
DECam data. Due to missing template observations and other losses, our
effective search area subtends 40 deg$^{2}$, corresponding to 12% total
probability in the initial map and 3% of the final map. In this area, we search
for objects that decline significantly between days 4-5 and day 7, and are
undetectable by day 24, finding none to typical magnitude limits of i=
21.5,21.1,20.1 for object colors (i-z)=1,0,-1, respectively. Our search
demonstrates the feasibility of a dedicated search program with DECam and bodes
well for future research in this emerging field.
[72]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05551 [pdf] - 1341811
CMB lensing tomography with the DES Science Verification galaxies
Giannantonio, T.;
Fosalba, P.;
Cawthon, R.;
Omori, Y.;
Crocce, M.;
Elsner, F.;
Leistedt, B.;
Dodelson, S.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Holder, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Carretero, J.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crittenden, R.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Krause, E.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Ross, A. J.;
Simard, G.;
Soergel, B.;
Stark, A.;
Story, K. T.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Weller, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Saliwanchik, B. R.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2016-01-18
We measure the cross-correlation between the galaxy density in the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and the lensing of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) as reconstructed with the Planck satellite and the
South Pole Telescope (SPT). When using the DES main galaxy sample over the full
redshift range $0.2 < z < 1.2$, a cross-correlation signal is detected at $6
\sigma$ and $4\sigma$ with SPT and Planck respectively. We then divide the DES
galaxies into five photometric redshift bins, finding significant ($>$$2
\sigma$) detections in all bins. Comparing to the fiducial Planck cosmology, we
find the redshift evolution of the signal matches expectations, although the
amplitude is consistently lower than predicted across redshift bins. We test
for possible systematics that could affect our result and find no evidence for
significant contamination. Finally, we demonstrate how these measurements can
be used to constrain the growth of structure across cosmic time. We find the
data are fit by a model in which the amplitude of structure in the $z<1.2$
universe is $0.73 \pm 0.16$ times as large as predicted in the LCDM Planck
cosmology, a $1.7\sigma$ deviation.
[73]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05360 [pdf] - 1327439
Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in
the DES Science Verification data
Crocce, M.;
Carretero, J.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sanchez, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Sanchez, C.;
Bonnett, C.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Brunner, R. J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Cawthon, R.;
Fosalba, P.;
Hartley, W.;
Kim, E. J.;
Leistedt, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Santiago, B.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-19, last modified: 2015-12-15
We study the clustering of galaxies detected at $i<22.5$ in the Science
Verification observations of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). Two-point
correlation functions are measured using $2.3\times 10^6$ galaxies over a
contiguous 116 deg$^2$ region in five bins of photometric redshift width
$\Delta z = 0.2$ in the range $0.2 < z < 1.2.$ The impact of photometric
redshift errors are assessed by comparing results using a template-based
photo-$z$ algorithm (BPZ) to a machine-learning algorithm (TPZ). A companion
paper (Leistedt et al 2015) presents maps of several observational variables
(e.g. seeing, sky brightness) which could modulate the galaxy density. Here we
characterize and mitigate systematic errors on the measured clustering which
arise from these observational variables, in addition to others such as
Galactic dust and stellar contamination. After correcting for systematic
effects we measure galaxy bias over a broad range of linear scales relative to
mass clustering predicted from the Planck $\Lambda$CDM model, finding agreement
with CFHTLS measurements with $\chi^2$ of 4.0 (8.7) with 5 degrees of freedom
for the TPZ (BPZ) redshifts. We test a "linear bias" model, in which the galaxy
clustering is a fixed multiple of the predicted non-linear dark-matter
clustering. The precision of the data allow us to determine that the linear
bias model describes the observed galaxy clustering to $2.5\%$ accuracy down to
scales at least $4$ to $10$ times smaller than those on which linear theory is
expected to be sufficient.
[74]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04535 [pdf] - 1378743
Cross-correlation of gravitational lensing from DES Science Verification
data with SPT and Planck lensing
Kirk, D.;
Omori, Y.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Larsen, P.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Holder, G.;
Jain, B.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
Nicola, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Sheldon, E.;
Story, K. T.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We measure the cross-correlation between weak lensing of galaxy images and of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of gravitational lensing on
different sources will be correlated if the lensing is caused by the same mass
fluctuations. We use galaxy shape measurements from 139 deg$^{2}$ of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and overlapping CMB lensing from
the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. The DES source galaxies have a
median redshift of $z_{\rm med} {\sim} 0.7$, while the CMB lensing kernel is
broad and peaks at $z{\sim}2$. The resulting cross-correlation is maximally
sensitive to mass fluctuations at $z{\sim}0.44$. Assuming the Planck 2015
best-fit cosmology, the amplitude of the DES$\times$SPT cross-power is found to
be $A = 0.88 \pm 0.30$ and that from DES$\times$Planck to be $A = 0.86 \pm
0.39$, where $A=1$ corresponds to the theoretical prediction. These are
consistent with the expected signal and correspond to significances of $2.9
\sigma$ and $2.2 \sigma$ respectively. We demonstrate that our results are
robust to a number of important systematic effects including the shear
measurement method, estimator choice, photometric redshift uncertainty and CMB
lensing systematics. Significant intrinsic alignment of galaxy shapes would
increase the cross-correlation signal inferred from the data; we calculate a
value of $A = 1.08 \pm 0.36$ for DES$\times$SPT when we correct the
observations with a simple IA model. With three measurements of this
cross-correlation now existing in the literature, there is not yet reliable
evidence for any deviation from the expected LCDM level of cross-correlation,
given the size of the statistical uncertainties and the significant impact of
systematic errors, particularly IAs. We provide forecasts for the expected
signal-to-noise of the combination of the five-year DES survey and SPT-3G.
[75]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05090 [pdf] - 1324854
Weak lensing by galaxy troughs in DES Science Verification data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bonnett, C.;
Hartley, W.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Krause, E.;
Mana, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Seitz, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-17, last modified: 2015-12-08
We measure the weak lensing shear around galaxy troughs, i.e. the radial
alignment of background galaxies relative to underdensities in projections of
the foreground galaxy field over a wide range of redshift in Science
Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey. Our detection of the shear
signal is highly significant (10 to 15$\sigma$ for the smallest angular scales)
for troughs with the redshift range z in [0.2,0.5] of the projected galaxy
field and angular diameters of 10 arcmin...1{\deg}. These measurements probe
the connection between the galaxy, matter density, and convergence fields. By
assuming galaxies are biased tracers of the matter density with Poissonian
noise, we find agreement of our measurements with predictions in a fiducial
Lambda cold dark matter model. The prediction for the lensing signal on large
trough scales is virtually independent of the details of the underlying model
for the connection of galaxies and matter. Our comparison of the shear around
troughs with that around cylinders with large galaxy counts is consistent with
a symmetry between galaxy and matter over- and underdensities. In addition, we
measure the two-point angular correlation of troughs with galaxies which, in
contrast to the lensing signal, is sensitive to galaxy bias on all scales. The
lensing signal of troughs and their clustering with galaxies is therefore a
promising probe of the statistical properties of matter underdensities and
their connection to the galaxy field.
[76]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.05156 [pdf] - 1530367
Planck intermediate results. XL. The Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal from the
Virgo cluster
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oppermann, N.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Soler, J. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Weller, J.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-11-16
The Virgo cluster is the largest Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) source in the sky,
both in terms of angular size and total integrated flux. Planck's wide angular
scale and frequency coverage, together with its high sensitivity, allow a
detailed study of this large object through the SZ effect. Virgo is well
resolved by Planck, showing an elongated structure, which correlates well with
the morphology observed from X-rays, but extends beyond the observed X-ray
signal. We find a good agreement between the SZ signal (or Compton paranmeter,
y_c) observed by Planck and the expected signal inferred from X-ray
observations and simple analytical models. Due to its proximity to us, the gas
beyond the virial radius can be studied with unprecedented sensitivity by
integrating the SZ signal over tens of square degrees. We study the signal in
the outskirts of Virgo and compare it with analytical models and a constrained
simulation of the environment of Virgo. Planck data suggest that significant
amounts of low-density plasma surround Virgo out to twice the virial radius. We
find the SZ signal in the outskirts of Virgo to be consistent with a simple
model that extrapolates the inferred pressure at lower radii while assuming
that the temperature stays in the keV range beyond the virial radius. The
observed signal is also consistent with simulations and points to a shallow
pressure profile in the outskirts of the cluster. This reservoir of gas at
large radii can be linked with the hottest phase of the elusive warm/hot
intergalactic medium. Taking the lack of symmetry of Virgo into account, we
find that a prolate model is favoured by the combination of SZ and X-ray data,
in agreement with predictions.
[77]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01494 [pdf] - 1411201
The Imprint of f(R) Gravity on Non-Linear Structure Formation
Submitted: 2015-11-04
We test the imprint of f(R) modified gravity on the halo mass function, using
N-body simulations and a theoretical model developed in (Kopp et al. 2013). We
find a very good agreement between theory and simulations. We extend the
theoretical model to the conditional mass function and apply it to the
prediction of the linear halo bias in f(R) gravity. Using the halo model we
obtain a prediction for the non-linear matter power spectrum accurate to ~10%
at z=0 and up to k=2h/Mpc. We also study halo profiles for the f(R) models and
find a deviation from the standard general relativity result up to 40%,
depending on the halo masses and redshift. This has not been pointed out in
previous analysis. Finally we study the number density and profiles of voids
identified in these f(R) N-body simulations. We underline the effect of the
bias and the sampling to identify voids. We find significant deviation from GR
when measuring the f(R) void profiles with fR0<-10^{-6}.
[78]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.1225 [pdf] - 1298080
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
Amendola, Luca;
Appleby, Stephen;
Bacon, David;
Baker, Tessa;
Baldi, Marco;
Bartolo, Nicola;
Blanchard, Alain;
Bonvin, Camille;
Borgani, Stefano;
Branchini, Enzo;
Burrage, Clare;
Camera, Stefano;
Carbone, Carmelita;
Casarini, Luciano;
Cropper, Mark;
deRham, Claudia;
di Porto, Cinzia;
Ealet, Anne;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Finelli, Fabio;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Guzzo, Luigi;
Heavens, Alan;
Heisenberg, Lavinia;
Heymans, Catherine;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Hollenstein, Lukas;
Holmes, Rory;
Horst, Ole;
Jahnke, Knud;
Kitching, Thomas D.;
Koivisto, Tomi;
Kunz, Martin;
La Vacca, Giuseppe;
March, Marisa;
Majerotto, Elisabetta;
Markovic, Katarina;
Marsh, David;
Marulli, Federico;
Massey, Richard;
Mellier, Yannick;
Mota, David F.;
Nunes, Nelson;
Percival, Will;
Pettorino, Valeria;
Porciani, Cristiano;
Quercellini, Claudia;
Read, Justin;
Rinaldi, Massimiliano;
Sapone, Domenico;
Scaramella, Roberto;
Skordis, Constantinos;
Simpson, Fergus;
Taylor, Andy;
Thomas, Shaun;
Trotta, Roberto;
Verde, Licia;
Vernizzi, Filippo;
Vollmer, Adrian;
Wang, Yun;
Weller, Jochen;
Zlosnik, Tom
Submitted: 2012-06-06, last modified: 2015-10-22
Euclid is a European Space Agency medium class mission selected for launch in
2019 within the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme. The main goal of Euclid is
to understand the origin of the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Euclid
will explore the expansion history of the Universe and the evolution of cosmic
structures by measuring shapes and redshifts of galaxies as well as the
distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky. Although
the main driver for Euclid is the nature of dark energy, Euclid science covers
a vast range of topics, from cosmology to galaxy evolution to planetary
research. In this review we focus on cosmology and fundamental physics, with a
strong emphasis on science beyond the current standard models. We discuss five
broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial
conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data
analysis. This review has been planned and carried out within Euclid's Theory
Working Group and is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that
will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid
mission.
[79]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05353 [pdf] - 1490633
Joint Analysis of Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing and Galaxy Clustering:
Methodology and Forecasts for DES
Park, Y.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Jain, B.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Honscheid, K.;
Rozo, E.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sánchez, C.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B;
Allam, S.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-19, last modified: 2015-09-16
The joint analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering is a
promising method for inferring the growth function of large scale structure.
This analysis will be carried out on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES),
with its measurements of both the distribution of galaxies and the tangential
shears of background galaxies induced by these foreground lenses. We develop a
practical approach to modeling the assumptions and systematic effects affecting
small scale lensing, which provides halo masses, and large scale galaxy
clustering. Introducing parameters that characterize the halo occupation
distribution (HOD), photometric redshift uncertainties, and shear measurement
errors, we study how external priors on different subsets of these parameters
affect our growth constraints. Degeneracies within the HOD model, as well as
between the HOD and the growth function, are identified as the dominant source
of complication, with other systematic effects sub-dominant. The impact of HOD
parameters and their degeneracies necessitate the detailed joint modeling of
the galaxy sample that we employ. We conclude that DES data will provide
powerful constraints on the evolution of structure growth in the universe,
conservatively/optimistically constraining the growth function to 7.9\%/4.8\%
with its first-year data that covered over 1000 square degrees, and to
3.9\%/2.3\% with its full five-year data that will survey 5000 square degrees,
including both statistical and systematic uncertainties.
[80]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[81]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.03002 [pdf] - 1248536
Wide-Field Lensing Mass Maps from DES Science Verification Data:
Methodology and Detailed Analysis
Vikram, V.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brout, D.;
Busha, M.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hartley, W.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
Lin, H.;
Melchior, P.;
Peiris, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2015-04-12, last modified: 2015-07-20
Weak gravitational lensing allows one to reconstruct the spatial distribution
of the projected mass density across the sky. These "mass maps" provide a
powerful tool for studying cosmology as they probe both luminous and dark
matter. In this paper, we present a weak lensing mass map reconstructed from
shear measurements in a 139 sq. deg area from the Dark Energy Survey (DES)
Science Verification (SV) data. We compare the distribution of mass with that
of the foreground distribution of galaxies and clusters. The overdensities in
the reconstructed map correlate well with the distribution of optically
detected clusters. We demonstrate that candidate superclusters and voids along
the line of sight can be identified, exploiting the tight scatter of the
cluster photometric redshifts. We cross-correlate the mass map with a
foreground magnitude-limited galaxy sample from the same data. Our measurement
gives results consistent with mock catalogs from N-body simulations that
include the primary sources of statistical uncertainties in the galaxy,
lensing, and photo-z catalogs. The statistical significance of the
cross-correlation is at the 6.8-sigma level with 20 arcminute smoothing. A
major goal of this study is to investigate systematic effects arising from a
variety of sources, including PSF and photo-z uncertainties. We make maps
derived from twenty variables that may characterize systematics and find the
principal components. We find that the contribution of systematics to the
lensing mass maps is generally within measurement uncertainties. In this work,
we analyze less than 3% of the final area that will be mapped by the DES; the
tools and analysis techniques developed in this paper can be applied to
forthcoming larger datasets from the survey.
[82]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.07814 [pdf] - 1296193
Constraints on the Richness-Mass Relation and the Optical-SZE Positional
Offset Distribution for SZE-Selected Clusters
Saro, A.;
Bocquet, S.;
Rozo, E.;
Benson, B. A.;
Mohr, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Bleem, L.;
Dodelson, S.;
Melchior, P.;
Sobreira, F.;
Upadhyay, V.;
Weller, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Bayliss, M.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brodwin, M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Capasso, R.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Chiu, I.;
Covarrubias, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
de Haan, T.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Cunha, C. E;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gupta, N.;
Hennig, C.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, Paul;
McDonald, M.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Stalder, B.;
Stark, A. A.;
Strazzullo, V.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D.;
Vikram, V.;
von der Linden, A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Wester, W.;
Zenteno, A.;
Ziegler, K. E.
Submitted: 2015-06-25
We cross-match galaxy cluster candidates selected via their
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (SZE) signatures in 129.1 deg$^2$ of the South Pole
Telescope 2500d SPT-SZ survey with optically identified clusters selected from
the Dark Energy Survey (DES) science verification data. We identify 25 clusters
between $0.1\lesssim z\lesssim 0.8$ in the union of the SPT-SZ and redMaPPer
(RM) samples. RM is an optical cluster finding algorithm that also returns a
richness estimate for each cluster. We model the richness $\lambda$-mass
relation with the following function $\langle\ln\lambda|M_{500}\rangle\propto
B_\lambda\ln M_{500}+C_\lambda\ln E(z)$ and use SPT-SZ cluster masses and RM
richnesses $\lambda$ to constrain the parameters. We find $B_\lambda=
1.14^{+0.21}_{-0.18}$ and $C_\lambda=0.73^{+0.77}_{-0.75}$. The associated
scatter in mass at fixed richness is $\sigma_{\ln M|\lambda} =
0.18^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ at a characteristic richness $\lambda=70$. We demonstrate
that our model provides an adequate description of the matched sample, showing
that the fraction of SPT-SZ selected clusters with RM counterparts is
consistent with expectations and that the fraction of RM selected clusters with
SPT-SZ counterparts is in mild tension with expectation. We model the
optical-SZE cluster positional offset distribution with the sum of two
Gaussians, showing that it is consistent with a dominant, centrally peaked
population and a sub-dominant population characterized by larger offsets. We
also cross-match the RM catalog with SPT-SZ candidates below the official
catalog threshold significance $\xi=4.5$, using the RM catalog to provide
optical confirmation and redshifts for additional low-$\xi$ SPT-SZ
candidates.In this way, we identify 15 additional clusters with $\xi\in
[4,4.5]$ over the redshift regime explored by RM in the overlapping region
between DES science verification data and the SPT-SZ survey.
[83]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.02165 [pdf] - 1378567
Next Generation Cosmology: Constraints from the Euclid Galaxy Cluster
Survey
Sartoris, B.;
Biviano, A.;
Fedeli, C.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Borgani, S.;
Costanzi, M.;
Giocoli, C.;
Moscardini, L.;
Weller, J.;
Ascaso, B.;
Bardelli, S.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Viana, P. T. P
Submitted: 2015-05-08
We study the characteristics of the galaxy cluster samples expected from the
European Space Agency's Euclid satellite and forecast constraints on
cosmological parameters describing a variety of cosmological models. The method
used in this paper, based on the Fisher Matrix approach, is the same one used
to provide the constraints presented in the Euclid Red Book (Laureijs et
al.2011). We describe the analytical approach to compute the selection function
of the photometric and spectroscopic cluster surveys. Based on the photometric
selection function, we forecast the constraints on a number of cosmological
parameter sets corresponding to different extensions of the standard LambdaCDM
model. The dynamical evolution of dark energy will be constrained to Delta
w_0=0.03 and Delta w_a=0.2 with free curvature Omega_k, resulting in a
(w_0,w_a) Figure of Merit (FoM) of 291. Including the Planck CMB covariance
matrix improves the constraints to Delta w_0=0.02, Delta w_a=0.07 and a
FoM=802. The amplitude of primordial non-Gaussianity, parametrised by f_NL,
will be constrained to \Delta f_NL ~ 6.6 for the local shape scenario, from
Euclid clusters alone. Using only Euclid clusters, the growth factor parameter
\gamma, which signals deviations from GR, will be constrained to Delta
\gamma=0.02, and the neutrino density parameter to Delta Omega_\nu=0.0013 (or
Delta \sum m_\nu=0.01). We emphasise that knowledge of the observable--mass
scaling relation will be crucial to constrain cosmological parameters from a
cluster catalogue. The Euclid mission will have a clear advantage in this
respect, thanks to its imaging and spectroscopic capabilities that will enable
internal mass calibration from weak lensing and the dynamics of cluster
galaxies. This information will be further complemented by wide-area
multi-wavelength external cluster surveys that will already be available when
Euclid flies. [Abridged]
[84]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.06759 [pdf] - 1224201
Data augmentation for machine learning redshifts applied to SDSS
galaxies
Submitted: 2015-01-27, last modified: 2015-04-01
We present analyses of data augmentation for machine learning redshift
estimation. Data augmentation makes a training sample more closely resemble a
test sample, if the two base samples differ, in order to improve measured
statistics of the test sample. We perform two sets of analyses by selecting
800k (1.7M) SDSS DR8 (DR10) galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts. We construct
a base training set by imposing an artificial r band apparent magnitude cut to
select only bright galaxies and then augment this base training set by using
simulations and by applying the K-correct package to artificially place
training set galaxies at a higher redshift.
We obtain redshift estimates for the remaining faint galaxy sample, which are
not used during training. We find that data augmentation reduces the error on
the recovered redshifts by 40% in both sets of analyses, when compared to the
difference in error between the ideal case and the non augmented case. The
outlier fraction is also reduced by at least 10% and up to 80% using data
augmentation.
We finally quantify how the recovered redshifts degrade as one probes to
deeper magnitudes past the artificial magnitude limit of the bright training
sample. We find that at all apparent magnitudes explored, the use of data
augmentation with tree based methods provide a estimate of the galaxy redshift
with a negligible bias, although the error on the recovered values increases as
we probe to deeper magnitudes. These results have applications for surveys
which have a spectroscopic training set which forms a biased sample of all
photometric galaxies, for example if the spectroscopic detection magnitude
limit is shallower than the photometric limit.
[85]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.4696 [pdf] - 1222632
Feature importance for machine learning redshifts applied to SDSS
galaxies
Submitted: 2014-10-17, last modified: 2015-03-10
We present an analysis of importance feature selection applied to photometric
redshift estimation using the machine learning architecture Decision Trees with
the ensemble learning routine Adaboost (hereafter RDF). We select a list of 85
easily measured (or derived) photometric quantities (or `features') and
spectroscopic redshifts for almost two million galaxies from the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey Data Release 10. After identifying which features have the most
predictive power, we use standard artificial Neural Networks (aNN) to show that
the addition of these features, in combination with the standard magnitudes and
colours, improves the machine learning redshift estimate by 18% and decreases
the catastrophic outlier rate by 32%. We further compare the redshift estimate
using RDF with those from two different aNNs, and with photometric redshifts
available from the SDSS. We find that the RDF requires orders of magnitude less
computation time than the aNNs to obtain a machine learning redshift while
reducing both the catastrophic outlier rate by up to 43%, and the redshift
error by up to 25%. When compared to the SDSS photometric redshifts, the RDF
machine learning redshifts both decreases the standard deviation of residuals
scaled by 1/(1+z) by 36% from 0.066 to 0.041, and decreases the fraction of
catastrophic outliers by 57% from 2.32% to 0.99%.
[86]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.4285 [pdf] - 996594
Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark
Energy Survey Science Verification data
Melchior, P.;
Suchyta, E.;
Huff, E.;
Hirsch, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Rykoff, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bacon, D.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S.;
Clampitt, J.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
Jouvel, S.;
Krause, E.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Patton, K.;
Plazas, A.;
Rowe, B.;
Vikram, V.;
Wilcox, H.;
Young, J.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S. S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bernstein, J. P.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Depoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G. R.;
Jarvis, M.;
Karliner, I.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B. D.;
Reil, K.;
Roe, N. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B. X.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Sypniewski, A. J.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A.;
Wechsler, R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2014-05-16, last modified: 2015-02-28
We measure the weak-lensing masses and galaxy distributions of four massive
galaxy clusters observed during the Science Verification phase of the Dark
Energy Survey. This pathfinder study is meant to 1) validate the DECam imager
for the task of measuring weak-lensing shapes, and 2) utilize DECam's large
field of view to map out the clusters and their environments over 90 arcmin. We
conduct a series of rigorous tests on astrometry, photometry, image quality,
PSF modeling, and shear measurement accuracy to single out flaws in the data
and also to identify the optimal data processing steps and parameters. We find
Science Verification data from DECam to be suitable for the lensing analysis
described in this paper. The PSF is generally well-behaved, but the modeling is
rendered difficult by a flux-dependent PSF width and ellipticity. We employ
photometric redshifts to distinguish between foreground and background
galaxies, and a red-sequence cluster finder to provide cluster richness
estimates and cluster-galaxy distributions. By fitting NFW profiles to the
clusters in this study, we determine weak-lensing masses that are in agreement
with previous work. For Abell 3261, we provide the first estimates of redshift,
weak-lensing mass, and richness. In addition, the cluster-galaxy distributions
indicate the presence of filamentary structures attached to 1E 0657-56 and RXC
J2248.7-4431, stretching out as far as 1 degree (approximately 20 Mpc),
showcasing the potential of DECam and DES for detailed studies of degree-scale
features on the sky.
[87]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.4540 [pdf] - 940322
Constraining dark sector perturbations II: ISW and CMB lensing
tomography
Submitted: 2014-09-16, last modified: 2015-02-10
Any Dark Energy (DE) or Modified Gravity (MG) model that deviates from a
cosmological constant requires a consistent treatment of its perturbations,
which can be described in terms of an effective entropy perturbation and an
anisotropic stress. We have considered a recently proposed generic
parameterisation of DE/MG perturbations and compared it to data from the Planck
satellite and six galaxy catalogues, including temperature-galaxy (Tg), CMB
lensing-galaxy and galaxy-galaxy (gg) correlations. Combining these observables
of structure formation with tests of the background expansion allows us to
investigate the properties of DE/MG both at the background and the perturbative
level. Our constraints on DE/MG are mostly in agreement with the cosmological
constant paradigm, while we also find that the constraint on the equation of
state w (assumed to be constant) depends on the model assumed for the
perturbation evolution. We obtain $w=-0.92^{+0.20}_{-0.16}$ (95% CL; CMB+gg+Tg)
in the entropy perturbation scenario; in the anisotropic stress case the result
is $w=-0.86^{+0.17}_{-0.16}$. Including the lensing correlations shifts the
results towards higher values of w. If we include a prior on the expansion
history from recent Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements, we find
that the constraints tighten closely around $w=-1$, making it impossible to
measure any DE/MG perturbation evolution parameters. If, however, upcoming
observations from surveys like DES, Euclid or LSST show indications for a
deviation from a cosmological constant, our formalism will be a useful tool
towards model selection in the dark sector.
[88]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.04291 [pdf] - 923038
Cosmology from the EoR/Cosmic Dawn with the SKA
Pritchard, Jonathan;
Ichiki, Kiyotomo;
Mesinger, Andrei;
Metcalf, Robert Benton;
Pourtsidou, Alkistis;
Santos, Mario;
Abdalla, Filipe;
Chang, Tzu-Ching;
Chen, Xuelei;
Weller, Jochen;
Zaroubi, Saleem
Submitted: 2015-01-18
The SKA will build upon early detections of the EoR by precursor instruments,
such as MWA, PAPER, and LOFAR, and planned instruments, such as HERA, to make
the first high signal-to-noise measurements of fluctuations in the 21 cm
brightness temperature from both reionization and the cosmic dawn. This will
allow both imaging and statistical maps of the 21cm signal at redshifts z = 6 -
27 and constrain the underlying cosmology and evolution of the density field.
This era includes nearly 60% of the (in principle) observable volume of the
Universe and many more linear modes than the CMB, presenting an opportunity for
SKA to usher in a new level of precision cosmology. This optimistic picture is
complicated by the need to understand and remove the effect of astrophysics, so
that systematics rather than statistics will limit constraints. This chapter
describes the cosmological, as opposed to astrophysical, information available
to SKA. Key areas for discussion include: cosmological parameters constraints
using 21cm fluctuations as a tracer of the density field; lensing of the 21cm
signal, constraints on heating via exotic physics such as decaying or
annihilating dark matter; impact of fundamental physics such as non-Gaussianity
or warm dark matter on the source population; and constraints on the bulk flows
arising from the decoupling of baryons and photons at z = 1000. The chapter
explores the path to separating cosmology from astrophysics, for example via
velocity space distortions and separation in redshift. We discuss new
opportunities for extracting cosmology made possible by the sensitivity of SKA
Phase 1 and explores the advances achievable with SKA2.
[89]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.5868 [pdf] - 910688
Galaxy Cluster Science with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect
Submitted: 2014-12-18
Studying galaxy clusters through their Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) imprint on the
Cosmic Microwave Background has many important advantages. The total SZ signal
is an accurate and precise tracer of the total pressure in the intra-cluster
medium and of cluster mass, the key observable for using clusters as
cosmological probes. Band 5 observations with SKA-MID towards cluster surveys
from the next generation of X-ray telescopes such as e-ROSITA and from Euclid
will provide the robust mass estimates required to exploit these samples. This
will be especially important for high redshift systems, arising from the SZ's
unique independence to redshift. In addition, galaxy clusters are very
interesting astrophysical systems in their own right, and the SKA's excellent
surface brightness sensitivity down to small angular scales will allow us to
explore the detailed gas physics of the intra-cluster medium.
[90]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.1364 [pdf] - 1202053
Computation of the Halo Mass Function Using Physical Collapse
Parameters: Application to Non-Standard Cosmologies
Submitted: 2013-12-04, last modified: 2014-11-11
In this article we compare the halo mass function predicted by the excursion
set theory with a drifting diffusive barrier against the results of N-body
simulations for several cosmological models. This includes the standard LCDM
case for a large range of halo masses, models with different types of
primordial non-Gaussianity, and the Ratra-Peebles quintessence model of Dark
Energy. We show that in all those cosmological scenarios, the abundance of dark
matter halos can be described by a drifting diffusive barrier, where the two
parameters describing the barrier have physical content. In the case of the
Gaussian LCDM, the statistics are precise enough to actually predict those
parameters at different redshifts from the initial conditions. Furthermore, we
found that the stochasticity in the barrier is nonnegligible making the simple
deterministic spherical collapse model a bad approximation even at very high
halo masses. We also show that using the standard excursion set approach with a
barrier inspired by peak patches leads to inconsistent predictions of the halo
mass function.
[91]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5062 [pdf] - 832330
Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Aussel, H.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Barrena, R.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bethermin, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Blanchard, A.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bourdin, H.;
Bowyer, J. W.;
Bridges, M.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carr, R.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casale, M.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Déchelette, T.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fabre, O.;
Falgarone, E.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Filliard, C.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Freschi, M.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Frommert, M.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gallegos, J.;
Galli, S.;
Gandolfo, B.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Gilfanov, M.;
Girard, D.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hansen, M.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Hempel, A.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Ho, S.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hou, Z.;
Hovest, W.;
Huey, G.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jasche, J.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kalberla, P.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Kerp, J.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lavabre, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Leroy, C.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Li, C.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lowe, S.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matsumura, T.;
Matthai, F.;
Maurin, L.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McDonald, A.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Millea, M.;
Miniscalco, R.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Nesvadba, N. P. H.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
North, C.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Orieux, F.;
Osborne, S.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Paykari, P.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Pullen, A. R.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Rahlin, A.;
Räth, C.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Riazuelo, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ringeval, C.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanselme, L.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schiavon, F.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Smith, K.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Tuttlebee, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vibert, L.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Winkel, B.;
Xia, J. -Q.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-06-05
The ESA's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early Universe and its
subsequent evolution, was launched 14 May 2009 and has been scanning the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously since 12 August 2009. This paper
gives an overview of the mission and its performance, the processing, analysis,
and characteristics of the data, the scientific results, and the science data
products and papers in the release. The science products include maps of the
CMB and diffuse extragalactic foregrounds, a catalogue of compact Galactic and
extragalactic sources, and a list of sources detected through the SZ effect.
The likelihood code used to assess cosmological models against the Planck data
and a lensing likelihood are described. Scientific results include robust
support for the standard six-parameter LCDM model of cosmology and improved
measurements of its parameters, including a highly significant deviation from
scale invariance of the primordial power spectrum. The Planck values for these
parameters and others derived from them are significantly different from those
previously determined. Several large-scale anomalies in the temperature
distribution of the CMB, first detected by WMAP, are confirmed with higher
confidence. Planck sets new limits on the number and mass of neutrinos, and has
measured gravitational lensing of CMB anisotropies at greater than 25 sigma.
Planck finds no evidence for non-Gaussianity in the CMB. Planck's results agree
well with results from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. Planck
finds a lower Hubble constant than found in some more local measures. Some
tension is also present between the amplitude of matter fluctuations derived
from CMB data and that derived from SZ data. The Planck and WMAP power spectra
are offset from each other by an average level of about 2% around the first
acoustic peak.
[92]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5080 [pdf] - 1165434
Planck 2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Barrena, R.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Blanchard, A.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bourdin, H.;
Bridges, M.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-03-28
We present constraints on cosmological parameters using number counts as a
function of redshift for a sub-sample of 189 galaxy clusters from the Planck SZ
(PSZ) catalogue. The PSZ is selected through the signature of the
Sunyaev--Zeldovich (SZ) effect, and the sub-sample used here has a
signal-to-noise threshold of seven, with each object confirmed as a cluster and
all but one with a redshift estimate. We discuss the completeness of the sample
and our construction of a likelihood analysis. Using a relation between mass
$M$ and SZ signal $Y$ calibrated to X-ray measurements, we derive constraints
on the power spectrum amplitude $\sigma_8$ and matter density parameter
$\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$ in a flat $\Lambda$CDM model. We test the robustness of
our estimates and find that possible biases in the $Y$--$M$ relation and the
halo mass function are larger than the statistical uncertainties from the
cluster sample. Assuming the X-ray determined mass to be biased low relative to
the true mass by between zero and 30%, motivated by comparison of the observed
mass scaling relations to those from a set of numerical simulations, we find
that $\sigma_8=0.75\pm 0.03$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}=0.29\pm 0.02$, and
$\sigma_8(\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}/0.27)^{0.3} = 0.764 \pm 0.025$. The value of
$\sigma_8$ is degenerate with the mass bias; if the latter is fixed to a value
of 20% we find $\sigma_8(\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}/0.27)^{0.3}=0.78\pm 0.01$ and a
tighter one-dimensional range $\sigma_8=0.77\pm 0.02$. We find that the larger
values of $\sigma_8$ and $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$ preferred by Planck's
measurements of the primary CMB anisotropies can be accommodated by a mass bias
of about 40%. Alternatively, consistency with the primary CMB constraints can
be achieved by inclusion of processes that suppress power on small scales
relative to the $\Lambda$CDM model, such as a component of massive neutrinos
(abridged).
[93]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.0287 [pdf] - 778556
Combining clustering and abundances of galaxy clusters to test cosmology
and primordial non-Gaussianity
Submitted: 2013-03-01, last modified: 2014-01-31
We present the clustering of galaxy clusters as a useful addition to the
common set of cosmological observables. The clustering of clusters probes the
large-scale structure of the Universe, extending galaxy clustering analysis to
the high-peak, high-bias regime. Clustering of galaxy clusters complements the
traditional cluster number counts and observable-mass relation analyses,
significantly improving their constraining power by breaking existing
calibration degeneracies. We use the maxBCG galaxy clusters catalogue to
constrain cosmological parameters and cross-calibrate the mass-observable
relation, using cluster abundances in richness bins and weak-lensing mass
estimates. We then add the redshift-space power spectrum of the sample,
including an effective modelling of the weakly non-linear contribution and
allowing for an arbitrary photometric redshift smoothing. The inclusion of the
power spectrum data allows for an improved self-calibration of the scaling
relation. We find that the inclusion of the power spectrum typically brings a
$\sim 50$ per cent improvement in the errors on the fluctuation amplitude
$\sigma_8$ and the matter density $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}$. Finally, we apply this
method to constrain models of the early universe through the amount of
primordial non-Gaussianity of the local type, using both the variation in the
halo mass function and the variation in the cluster bias. We find a constraint
on the amount of skewness $f_{\mathrm{NL}} = 12 \pm 157 $ ($1\sigma$) from the
cluster data alone.
[94]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.1349 [pdf] - 773389
Improved Primordial Non-Gaussianity Constraints from Measurements of
Galaxy Clustering and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect
Submitted: 2013-03-06, last modified: 2013-12-18
We present the strongest robust constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity
(PNG) from currently available galaxy surveys, combining large-scale clustering
measurements and their cross-correlations with the cosmic microwave background.
We update the data sets used by Giannantonio et al. (2012), and broaden that
analysis to include the full set of two-point correlation functions between all
surveys. In order to obtain the most reliable constraints on PNG, we advocate
the use of the cross-correlations between the catalogs as a robust estimator
and we perform an extended analysis of the possible systematics to reduce their
impact on the results. To minimize the impact of stellar contamination in our
luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample, we use the recent Baryon Oscillations
Spectroscopic Survey catalog of Ross et al. (2011). We also find evidence for a
new systematic in the NVSS radio galaxy survey similar to, but smaller than,
the known declination-dependent issue; this is difficult to remove without
affecting the inferred PNG signal, and thus we do not include the NVSS
auto-correlation function in our analyses. We find no evidence of primordial
non-Gaussianity; for the local-type configuration we obtain for the skewness
parameter $ -36 < f_{\mathrm{NL}} < 45 $ at 95 % c.l. ($5 \pm 21$ at $1\sigma$)
when using the most conservative part of our data set, improving previous
results; we also find no evidence for significant kurtosis, parameterized by
$g_{\mathrm{NL}}$. In addition to PNG, we simultaneously constrain dark energy
and find that it is required with a form consistent with a cosmological
constant.
[95]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.3233 [pdf] - 750667
Spherical collapse and halo mass function in f(R) theories
Submitted: 2013-06-13, last modified: 2013-11-23
We compute the critical density of collapse for spherically symmetric
overdensities in a class of f(R) modified gravity models. For the first time we
evolve the Einstein, scalar field and non-linear fluid equations, making the
minimal simplifying assumptions that the metric potentials and scalar field
remain quasi-static throughout the collapse. Initially evolving a top hat
profile, we find that the density threshold for collapse depends significantly
on the initial conditions imposed, specifically the choice of size and shape.
By imposing `natural' initial conditions, we obtain a fitting function for the
spherical collapse delta_c as a function of collapse redshift, mass of the
overdensity and f_{R0}, the background scalar field value at z=0. By extending
delta_c into drifting and diffusing barrier within the context of excursion set
theory, we obtain a realistic mass function that might be used to confront this
class of scalar-tensor models with observations of dark matter halos. The
proposed analytic formula for the halo mass function was tested against Monte
Carlo random walks for a wide class of moving barriers and can therefore be
applied to other modified gravity theories.
[96]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.2423 [pdf] - 739030
Fermion condensate from torsion in the reheating era after inflation
Submitted: 2013-07-09, last modified: 2013-10-28
The inclusion of Dirac fermions in Einstein-Cartan gravity leads to a
four-fermion interaction mediated by non-propagating torsion, which can allow
for the formation of a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer condensate. By considering a
simplified model in 2+1 spacetime dimensions, we show that even without an
excess of fermions over antifermions, the nonthermal distribution arising from
preheating after inflation can give rise to a fermion condensate generated by
torsion. We derive the effective Lagrangian for the spacetime-dependent pair
field describing the condensate in the extreme cases of nonrelativistic and
massless fermions, and show that it satisfies the Gross-Pitaevski equation for
a gapless, propagating mode.
[97]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.7977 [pdf] - 758976
Modified gravity with logarithmic curvature corrections and the
structure of relativistic stars
Submitted: 2013-07-30, last modified: 2013-08-12
We consider the effect of a logarithmic f(R) theory, motivated by the form of
the one-loop effective action arising from gluons in curved spacetime, on the
structure of relativistic stars. In addition to analysing the consistency
constraints on the potential of the scalar degree of freedom, we discuss the
possibility of observational features arising from a fifth force in the
vicinity of the neutron star surface. We find that the model exhibits a
chameleon effect that completely suppresses the effect of the modification on
scales exceeding a few radii, but close to the surface of the neutron star, the
deviation from General Relativity can significantly affect the surface redshift
that determines the shift in absorption (or emission) lines. We also use the
method of perturbative constraints to solve the modified
Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkov equations for normal and self-bound neutron stars
(quark stars).
[98]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.6982 [pdf] - 714268
Cluster Probes of Dark Energy Clustering
Submitted: 2013-05-29
Cluster abundances are oddly insensitive to canonical early dark energy.
Early dark energy with sound speed equal to the speed of light cannot be
distinguished from a quintessence model with the equivalent expansion history
for $z<2$ but negligible early dark energy density, despite the different early
growth rate. However, cold early dark energy, with a sound speed much smaller
than the speed of light, can give a detectable signature. Combining cluster
abundances with cosmic microwave background power spectra can determine the
early dark energy fraction to 0.3 % and distinguish a true sound speed of 0.1
from 1 at 99 % confidence. We project constraints on early dark energy from the
Euclid cluster survey, as well as the Dark Energy Survey, using both current
and projected Planck CMB data, and assess the impact of cluster mass
systematics. We also quantify the importance of dark energy perturbations, and
the role of sound speed during a crossing of $w=-1$.
[99]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4124 [pdf] - 615950
Pathway to the Square Kilometre Array - The German White Paper -
Aharonian, F.;
Arshakian, T. G.;
Allen, B.;
Banerjee, R.;
Beck, R.;
Becker, W.;
Bomans, D. J.;
Breitschwerdt, D.;
Brüggen, M.;
Brunthaler, A.;
Catinella, B.;
Champion, D.;
Ciardi, B.;
Crocker, R.;
de Avillez, M. A.;
Dettmar, R. J.;
Engels, D.;
Enßlin, T.;
Enke, H.;
Fieseler, T.;
Gizon, L.;
Hackmann, E.;
Hartmann, B.;
Henkel, C.;
Hoeft, M.;
Iapichino, L.;
Innes, D.;
James, C.;
Jasche, J.;
Jones, D.;
Kagramanova, V.;
Kauffmann, G.;
Keane, E.;
Kerp, J.;
Klöckner, H. -R.;
Kokkotas, K.;
Kramer, M.;
Krause, M.;
Krause, M.;
Krupp, N.;
Kunz, J.;
Lämmerzahl, C.;
Lee, K. J.;
List, M.;
Liu, K.;
Lobanov, A.;
Mann, G.;
Merloni, A.;
Middelberg, E.;
Niemeyer, J.;
Noutsos, A.;
Perlick, V.;
Reich, W.;
Richter, P.;
Roy, A.;
Saintonge, A.;
Schäfer, G.;
Schaffner-Bielich, J.;
Schinnerer, E.;
Schleicher, D.;
Schneider, P.;
Schwarz, D. J.;
Sedrakian, A.;
Sesana, A.;
Smolčić, V.;
Solanki, S.;
Tuffs, R.;
Vetter, M.;
Weber, E.;
Weller, J.;
Wex, N.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Zwaan, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-16
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is the most ambitious radio telescope ever
planned. With a collecting area of about a square kilometre, the SKA will be
far superior in sensitivity and observing speed to all current radio
facilities. The scientific capability promised by the SKA and its technological
challenges provide an ideal base for interdisciplinary research, technology
transfer, and collaboration between universities, research centres and
industry. The SKA in the radio regime and the European Extreme Large Telescope
(E-ELT) in the optical band are on the roadmap of the European Strategy Forum
for Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) and have been recognised as the essential
facilities for European research in astronomy.
This "White Paper" outlines the German science and R&D interests in the SKA
project and will provide the basis for future funding applications to secure
German involvement in the Square Kilometre Array.
[100]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.4131 [pdf] - 1158556
Planck Intermediate Results. XI: The gas content of dark matter halos:
the Sunyaev-Zeldovich-stellar mass relation for locally brightest galaxies
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Barrena, R.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bourdin, H.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Démoclès, J.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frommert, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leonardi, R.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Luzzi, G.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Mei, S.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Piffaretti, R.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Spencer, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wang, W.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, S. D. M.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2012-12-17
We present the scaling relation between Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) signal and
stellar mass for almost 260,000 locally brightest galaxies (LBGs) selected from
the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). These are predominantly the central
galaxies of their dark matter halos. We calibrate the stellar-to-halo mass
conversion using realistic mock catalogues based on the Millennium Simulation.
Applying a multi-frequency matched filter to the Planck data for each LBG, and
averaging the results in bins of stellar mass, we measure the mean SZ signal
down to $M_\ast\sim 2\times 10^{11} \Msolar$, with a clear indication of signal
at even lower stellar mass. We derive the scaling relation between SZ signal
and halo mass by assigning halo properties from our mock catalogues to the real
LBGs and simulating the Planck observation process. This relation shows no
evidence for deviation from a power law over a halo mass range extending from
rich clusters down to $M_{500}\sim 2\times 10^{13} \Msolar$, and there is a
clear indication of signal down to $M_{500}\sim 4\times 10^{12} \Msolar$.
Planck's SZ detections in such low-mass halos imply that about a quarter of all
baryons have now been seen in the form of hot halo gas, and that this gas must
be less concentrated than the dark matter in such halos in order to remain
consistent with X-ray observations. At the high-mass end, the measured SZ
signal is 20% lower than found from observations of X-ray clusters, a
difference consistent with Malmquist bias effects in the X-ray sample.
[101]
oai:arXiv.org:1204.2743 [pdf] - 968286
Planck intermediate results. III. The relation between galaxy cluster
mass and Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bhatia, R.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borgani, S.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bourdin, H.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Coulais, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frommert, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jagemann, T.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leonardi, R.;
Liddle, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Luzzi, G.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Munshi, D.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Osborne, S.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Piffaretti, R.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Weller, J.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2012-04-12, last modified: 2012-09-14
We examine the relation between the galaxy cluster mass M and
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect signal D_A^2 Y for a sample of 19 objects for
which weak lensing (WL) mass measurements obtained from Subaru Telescope data
are available in the literature. Hydrostatic X-ray masses are derived from
XMM-Newton archive data and the SZ effect signal is measured from Planck
all-sky survey data. We find an M_WL-D_A^2 Y relation that is consistent in
slope and normalisation with previous determinations using weak lensing masses;
however, there is a normalisation offset with respect to previous measures
based on hydrostatic X-ray mass-proxy relations. We verify that our SZ effect
measurements are in excellent agreement with previous determinations from
Planck data. For the present sample, the hydrostatic X-ray masses at R_500 are
on average ~ 20 per cent larger than the corresponding weak lensing masses, at
odds with expectations. We show that the mass discrepancy is driven by a
difference in mass concentration as measured by the two methods, and, for the
present sample, the mass discrepancy and difference in mass concentration is
especially large for disturbed systems. The mass discrepancy is also linked to
the offset in centres used by the X-ray and weak lensing analyses, which again
is most important in disturbed systems. We outline several approaches that are
needed to help achieve convergence in cluster mass measurement with X-ray and
weak lensing observations.
[102]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.3376 [pdf] - 1453902
Planck Intermediate Results. IV. The XMM-Newton validation programme for
new Planck galaxy clusters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borgani, S.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Brown, M. L.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Carvalho, P.;
Catalano, A.;
Cayón, L.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frommert, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
González-Riestra, R.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Hempel, A.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jagemann, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leonardi, R.;
Liddle, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Luzzi, G.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mann, R.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Osborne, S.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Piffaretti, R.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Stanford, A.;
Stivoli, F.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2012-05-15, last modified: 2012-08-20
We present the final results from the XMM-Newton validation follow-up of new
Planck galaxy cluster candidates. We observed 15 new candidates, detected with
signal-to-noise ratios between 4.0 and 6.1 in the 15.5-month nominal Planck
survey. The candidates were selected using ancillary data flags derived from
the ROSAT All Sky Survey (RASS) and Digitized Sky Survey all-sky maps, with the
aim of pushing into the low SZ flux, high-z regime and testing RASS flags as
indicators of candidate reliability. 14 new clusters were detected by XMM,
including 2 double systems. Redshifts lie in the range 0.2 to 0.9, with 6
clusters at z>0.5. Estimated M500 range from 2.5 10^14 to 8 10^14 Msun. We
discuss our results in the context of the full XMM validation programme, in
which 51 new clusters have been detected. This includes 4 double and 2 triple
systems, some of which are chance projections on the sky of clusters at
different z. We find that association with a RASS-BSC source is a robust
indicator of the reliability of a candidate, whereas association with a FSC
source does not guarantee that the SZ candidate is a bona fide cluster.
Nevertheless, most Planck clusters appear in RASS maps, with a significance
greater than 2 sigma being a good indication that the candidate is a real
cluster. The full sample gives a Planck sensitivity threshold of Y500 ~ 4 10^-4
arcmin^2, with indication for Malmquist bias in the YX-Y500 relation below this
level. The corresponding mass threshold depends on z. Systems with M500 > 5
10^14 Msun at z > 0.5 are easily detectable with Planck. The newly-detected
clusters follow the YX-Y500 relation derived from X-ray selected samples.
Compared to X-ray selected clusters, the new SZ clusters have a lower X-ray
luminosity on average for their mass. There is no indication of departure from
standard self-similar evolution in the X-ray versus SZ scaling properties.
(abridged)
[103]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.0327 [pdf] - 534505
Probing dark energy with the next generation X-ray surveys of galaxy
clusters
Submitted: 2011-12-01, last modified: 2012-07-09
We present forecasts on the capability of future wide-area high-sensitivity
X-ray surveys of galaxy clusters to yield constraints on the parameters
defining the Dark Energy (DE) equation of state (EoS). Our analysis is carried
out for future X-ray surveys which have enough sensitivity to provide accurate
measurements of X-ray mass proxies and Fe-line based redshifts for about 2x10^4
clusters. We base our analysis on the Fisher Matrix formalism, by combining
information on the cluster number counts and power spectrum, also including,
for the first time in the analysis of the large scale cluster distribution, the
effect of linear redshift-space distortions (RSDs). This study is performed
with the main purpose of dissecting the cosmological information provided by
geometrical and growth tests, which are both included in the analysis of number
counts and clustering of galaxy clusters. We compare cosmological constraints
obtained by assuming different levels of prior knowledge of the parameters
which define the observable-mass X-ray relation. This comparison further
demonstrates the fundamental importance of having a well calibrated
observable-mass relation and, most importantly, its redshift evolution. Such a
calibration can be achieved only by having at least $\sim 10^3$ net photon
counts for each cluster included in the survey. We show that RSDs in the power
spectrum analysis carry important cosmological information also when traced
with galaxy clusters and the DE FoM increases by a factor of 8. Besides
confirming the potential that large cluster surveys have in constraining the
nature of DE, our analysis emphasizes that a full exploitation of the
cosmological information carried by such surveys requires not only a large
statistic but also a robust measurement of the mass proxies and redshifts for a
significant fraction of the cluster sample, derived from the same X-ray survey
data.
[104]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.3984 [pdf] - 1123484
On the Validity of Cosmological Fisher Matrix Forecasts
Submitted: 2012-05-17, last modified: 2012-06-01
We present a comparison of Fisher matrix forecasts for cosmological probes
with Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) posterior likelihood estimation methods.
We analyse the performance of future Dark Energy Task Force (DETF) stage-III
and stage- IV dark-energy surveys using supernovae, baryon acoustic
oscillations and weak lensing as probes. We concentrate in particular on the
dark-energy equation of state parameters w0 and wa. For purely geometrical
probes, and especially when marginalising over wa, we find considerable
disagreement between the two methods, since in this case the Fisher matrix can
not reproduce the highly non-elliptical shape of the likelihood function. More
quantitatively, the Fisher method underestimates the marginalized errors for
purely geometrical probes between 30%-70%. For cases including structure
formation such as weak lensing, we find that the posterior probability contours
from the Fisher matrix estimation are in good agreement with the MCMC contours
and the forecasted errors only changing on the 5% level. We then explore
non-linear transformations resulting in physically-motivated parameters and
investigate whether these parameterisations exhibit a Gaussian behaviour. We
conclude that for the purely geometrical probes and, more generally, in cases
where it is not known whether the likelihood is close to Gaussian, the Fisher
matrix is not the appropriate tool to produce reliable forecasts.
[105]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.0237 [pdf] - 519781
Inflationary predictions in scalar-tensor DBI inflation
Submitted: 2011-11-01, last modified: 2012-05-31
The scalar-tensor Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) inflation scenario provides a
simple mechanism to reduce the large values of the boost factor associated with
single field models with DBI action, whilst still being able to drive 60 efolds
of inflation. Using a slow-roll approach, we obtain an analytical expression
for the spectral index of the perturbations and, moreover, determine
numerically the regions of the parameter space of the model capable of giving
rise to a power spectrum with amplitude and spectral index within the observed
bounds. We find that regions that exhibit significant DBI effects throughout
the inflationary period can be discarded by virtue of a blue-tilted spectral
index, however, there are a number of viable cases --- associated with a more
red-tilted spectral index --- for which the boost factor is initially
suppressed by the effect of the coupling between the fields, but increases
later to moderate values.
[106]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.5595 [pdf] - 1453894
Planck Intermediate Results. I. Further validation of new Planck
clusters with XMM-Newton
The Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bourdin, H.;
Brown, M. L.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Catalano, A.;
Cayón, L.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giard, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
González-Riestra, R.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Hempel, A.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jagemann, T.;
Jasche, J.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leonardi, R.;
Liddle, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Luzzi, G.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mann, R.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Osborne, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stivoli, F.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Weller, J.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2011-12-23, last modified: 2012-05-10
We present further results from the ongoing XMM-Newton validation follow-up
of Planck cluster candidates, detailing X-ray observations of eleven candidates
detected at a signal-to-noise ratio of 4.5<S/N<5.3 in the same 10-month survey
maps used in the construction of the Early SZ sample. The sample was selected
in order to test internal SZ quality flags, and the pertinence of these flags
is discussed in light of the validation results. Ten of the candidates are
found to be bona fide clusters lying below the RASS flux limit. Redshift
estimates are available for all confirmed systems via X-ray Fe-line
spectroscopy. They lie in the redshift range 0.19<z<0.94, demonstrating
Planck's capability to detect clusters up to high z. The X-ray properties of
the new clusters appear to be similar to previous new detections by Planck at
lower z and higher SZ flux: the majority are X-ray underluminous for their
mass, estimated using Y_X as mass proxy, and many have a disturbed morphology.
We find tentative indication for Malmquist bias in the Y_SZ-Y_X relation, with
a turnover at Y_SZ \sim 4 e-4 arcmin^2. We present additional new optical
redshift determinations with ENO and ESO telescopes of candidates previously
confirmed with XMM-Newton. The X-ray and optical redshifts for a total of 20
clusters are found to be in excellent agreement. We also show that useful lower
limits can be put on cluster redshifts using X-ray data only via the use of the
Y_X vs. Y_SZ and X-ray flux F_X vs. Y_SZ relations.
[107]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.4094 [pdf] - 1078114
The Non-Linear Matter Power Spectrum in Warm Dark Matter Cosmologies
Submitted: 2011-07-20, last modified: 2011-10-26
We investigate the non-linear evolution of the matter power spectrum by using
a large set of high-resolution N-body/hydrodynamic simulations. The linear
matter power in the initial conditions is consistently modified to accommodate
warm dark matter particles which induce a small scale cut-off in the power as
compared to standard cold dark matter scenarios. The impact of such thermal
relics is addressed at small scales with k > 1 h/Mpc and at z < 5, which are
particularly important for the next generation of Lyman-alpha forest, weak
lensing and galaxy clustering surveys. We quantify the mass and redshift
dependence of the warm dark matter non-linear matter power and we provide a
fitting formula which is accurate at the ~2% level below z=3 and for masses
m_wdm > 0.5 keV. The role of baryonic physics (cooling, star formation and
feedback recipes) on the warm dark matter induced suppression is also
quantified. Furthermore, we compare our findings with the halo model and show
their impact on the cosmic shear power spectra.
[108]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.3193 [pdf] - 429544
Euclid Definition Study Report
Laureijs, R.;
Amiaux, J.;
Arduini, S.;
Auguères, J. -L.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Cole, R.;
Cropper, M.;
Dabin, C.;
Duvet, L.;
Ealet, A.;
Garilli, B.;
Gondoin, P.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoar, J.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Holmes, R.;
Kitching, T.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Mellier, Y.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W.;
Rhodes, J.;
Criado, G. Saavedra;
Sauvage, M.;
Scaramella, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Warren, S.;
Bender, R.;
Castander, F.;
Cimatti, A.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Levi, M.;
Lilje, P.;
Meylan, G.;
Nichol, R.;
Pedersen, K.;
Popa, V.;
Lopez, R. Rebolo;
Rix, H. -W.;
Rottgering, H.;
Zeilinger, W.;
Grupp, F.;
Hudelot, P.;
Massey, R.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Miller, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Paulin-Henriksson, S.;
Pires, S.;
Saxton, C.;
Schrabback, T.;
Seidel, G.;
Walsh, J.;
Aghanim, N.;
Amendola, L.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Benabed, K.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Elbaz, D.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gavazzi, G.;
Helmi, A.;
Hook, I.;
Irwin, M.;
Kneib, J. -P.;
Kunz, M.;
Mannucci, F.;
Moscardini, L.;
Tao, C.;
Teyssier, R.;
Weller, J.;
Zamorani, G.;
Osorio, M. R. Zapatero;
Boulade, O.;
Foumond, J. J.;
Di Giorgio, A.;
Guttridge, P.;
James, A.;
Kemp, M.;
Martignac, J.;
Spencer, A.;
Walton, D.;
Blümchen, T.;
Bonoli, C.;
Bortoletto, F.;
Cerna, C.;
Corcione, L.;
Fabron, C.;
Jahnke, K.;
Ligori, S.;
Madrid, F.;
Martin, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Pamplona, T.;
Prieto, E.;
Riva, M.;
Toledo, R.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Zerbi, F.;
Abdalla, F.;
Douspis, M.;
Grenet, C.;
Borgani, S.;
Bouwens, R.;
Courbin, F.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Dubath, P.;
Fontana, A.;
Frailis, M.;
Grazian, A.;
Koppenhöfer, J.;
Mansutti, O.;
Melchior, M.;
Mignoli, M.;
Mohr, J.;
Neissner, C.;
Noddle, K.;
Poncet, M.;
Scodeggio, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Shane, N.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Surace, C.;
Taylor, A.;
Verdoes-Kleijn, G.;
Vuerli, C.;
Williams, O. R.;
Zacchei, A.;
Altieri, B.;
Sanz, I. Escudero;
Kohley, R.;
Oosterbroek, T.;
Astier, P.;
Bacon, D.;
Bardelli, S.;
Baugh, C.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Bianchi, D.;
Biviano, A.;
Branchini, E.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V.;
Clements, D.;
Colombi, S.;
Conselice, C.;
Cresci, G.;
Deacon, N.;
Dunlop, J.;
Fedeli, C.;
Fontanot, F.;
Franzetti, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gow, J.;
Heavens, A.;
Hewett, P.;
Heymans, C.;
Holland, A.;
Huang, Z.;
Ilbert, O.;
Joachimi, B.;
Jennins, E.;
Kerins, E.;
Kiessling, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kotak, R.;
Krause, O.;
Lahav, O.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lombardi, M.;
Magliocchetti, M.;
Maguire, K.;
Majerotto, E.;
Maoli, R.;
Marulli, F.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCracken, H.;
McLure, R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Merson, A.;
Moresco, M.;
Nonino, M.;
Norberg, P.;
Peacock, J.;
Pello, R.;
Penny, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Di Porto, C.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Radovich, M.;
Rassat, A.;
Roche, N.;
Ronayette, S.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schneider, P.;
Semboloni, E.;
Serjeant, S.;
Simpson, F.;
Skordis, C.;
Smadja, G.;
Smartt, S.;
Spano, P.;
Spiro, S.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tilquin, A.;
Trotta, R.;
Verde, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Williger, G.;
Zhao, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2011-10-14
Euclid is a space-based survey mission from the European Space Agency
designed to understand the origin of the Universe's accelerating expansion. It
will use cosmological probes to investigate the nature of dark energy, dark
matter and gravity by tracking their observational signatures on the geometry
of the universe and on the cosmic history of structure formation. The mission
is optimised for two independent primary cosmological probes: Weak
gravitational Lensing (WL) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). The Euclid
payload consists of a 1.2 m Korsch telescope designed to provide a large field
of view. It carries two instruments with a common field-of-view of ~0.54 deg2:
the visual imager (VIS) and the near infrared instrument (NISP) which contains
a slitless spectrometer and a three bands photometer. The Euclid wide survey
will cover 15,000 deg2 of the extragalactic sky and is complemented by two 20
deg2 deep fields. For WL, Euclid measures the shapes of 30-40 resolved galaxies
per arcmin2 in one broad visible R+I+Z band (550-920 nm). The photometric
redshifts for these galaxies reach a precision of dz/(1+z) < 0.05. They are
derived from three additional Euclid NIR bands (Y, J, H in the range 0.92-2.0
micron), complemented by ground based photometry in visible bands derived from
public data or through engaged collaborations. The BAO are determined from a
spectroscopic survey with a redshift accuracy dz/(1+z) =0.001. The slitless
spectrometer, with spectral resolution ~250, predominantly detects Ha emission
line galaxies. Euclid is a Medium Class mission of the ESA Cosmic Vision
2015-2025 programme, with a foreseen launch date in 2019. This report (also
known as the Euclid Red Book) describes the outcome of the Phase A study.
[109]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.0873 [pdf] - 1083823
Model-Independent Reconstruction of the Expansion History of the
Universe from Type Ia Supernovae
Submitted: 2011-09-05
Based on the largest homogeneously reduced set of Type Ia supernova
luminosity data currently available -- the Union2 sample -- we reconstruct the
expansion history of the Universe in a model-independent approach. Our method
tests the geometry of the Universe directly without reverting to any
assumptions made on its energy content. This allows us to constrain Dark Energy
models and non-standard cosmologies in a straightforward way. The applicability
of the presented method is not restricted to testing cosmological models. It
can be a valuable tool for pointing out systematic errors hidden in the
supernova data and planning future Type Ia supernova cosmology campaigns.
[110]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.1376 [pdf] - 1077123
Planck Early Results XXVI: Detection with Planck and confirmation by
XMM-Newton of PLCK G266.6-27.3, an exceptionally X-ray luminous and massive
galaxy cluster at z~1
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bhatia, R.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borgani, S.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Brown, M. L.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cantalupo, C. M.;
Cappellini, B.;
Carvalho, P.;
Catalano, A.;
Cayón, L.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, C.;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
D'Arcangelo, O.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giard, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
González-Riestra, R.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Heinämäki, P.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leroy, C.;
Liddle, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Luzzi, G.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marleau, F.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Nevalainen, J.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Paladini, R.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Piffaretti, R.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Saar, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sutton, D.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Türler, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Weller, J.;
White, S. D. M.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2011-06-07, last modified: 2011-07-27
We present first results on PLCK G266.6-27.3, a galaxy cluster candidate
detected at a signal-to-noise ratio of 5 in the Planck All Sky survey. An
XMM-Newton validation observation has allowed us to confirm that the candidate
is a bona fide galaxy cluster. With these X-ray data we measure an accurate
redshift, z = 0.94 +/- 0.02, and estimate the cluster mass to be M_500 = (7.8
+/- 0.8)e+14 solar masses. PLCK G266.6-27.3 is an exceptional system: its
luminosity of L_X(0.5-2.0 keV)=(1.4 +/- 0.05)e+45 erg/s, equals that of the two
most luminous known clusters in the z > 0.5 universe, and it is one of the most
massive clusters at z~1. Moreover, unlike the majority of high-redshift
clusters, PLCK G266.6-27.3 appears to be highly relaxed. This observation
confirms Planck's capability of detecting high-redshift, high-mass clusters,
and opens the way to the systematic study of population evolution in the
exponential tail of the mass function.
[111]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2024 [pdf] - 1453863
Planck Early Results VIII: The all-sky Early Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster
sample
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bhatia, R.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cantalupo, C. M.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Catalano, A.;
Cayón, L.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, C.;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Dörl, U.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores, I.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
González-Riestra, R.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Harrison, D.;
Heinämäki, P.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hovest, W.;
Hoyland, R. J.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Hurley-Walker, N.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knox, L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leonardi, R.;
Li, C.;
Liddle, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mann, R.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamie, M.;
Osborne, S.;
Pajot, F.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Piffaretti, R.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Saar, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, P.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Stanford, A.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Taburet, N.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Weller, J.;
White, S. D. M.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2011-07-07
We present the first all-sky sample of galaxy clusters detected blindly by
the Planck satellite through the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect from its six
highest frequencies. This early SZ (ESZ) sample is comprised of 189 candidates,
which have a high signal-to-noise ratio ranging from 6 to 29. Its high
reliability (purity above 95%) is further ensured by an extensive validation
process based on Planck internal quality assessments and by external
cross-identification and follow-up observations. Planck provides the first
measured SZ signal for about 80% of the 169 previously-known ESZ clusters.
Planck furthermore releases 30 new cluster candidates, amongst which 20 meet
the ESZ signal-to-noise selection criterion. At the submission date, twelve of
the 20 ESZ candidates were confirmed as new clusters, with eleven confirmed
using XMM-Newton snapshot observations, most of them with disturbed
morphologies and low luminosities. The ESZ clusters are mostly at moderate
redshifts (86% with z below 0.3) and span more than a decade in mass, up to the
rarest and most massive clusters with masses above 10^15 Msol.
[112]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.4369 [pdf] - 380162
Separate Universes Do Not Constrain Primordial Black Hole Formation
Submitted: 2010-12-20, last modified: 2011-06-17
Carr and Hawking showed that the proper size of a spherical overdense region
surrounded by a flat FRW universe cannot be arbitrarily large as otherwise the
region would close up on itself and become a separate universe. From this
result they derived a condition connecting size and density of the overdense
region ensuring that it is part of our universe. Carr used this condition to
obtain an upper bound for the density fluctuation amplitude with the property
that for smaller amplitudes the formation of a primordial black hole is
possible, while larger ones indicate a separate universe. In contrast, we find
that the appearance of a maximum is not a consequence of avoiding separate
universes but arises naturally from the geometry of the chosen slicing. Using
instead of density a volume fluctuation variable reveals that a fluctuation is
a separate universe iff this variable diverges on superhorizon scales. Hence
Carr's and Hawking's condition does not pose a physical constraint on density
fluctuations. The dynamics of primordial black hole formation with an initial
curvature fluctuation amplitude larger than the one corresponding to the
maximum density fluctuation amplitude was previously not considered in detail
and so we compare it to the well-known case where the amplitude is smaller by
presenting embedding and conformal diagrams of both types in dust spacetimes.
[113]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.1567 [pdf] - 955745
Embedding DBI inflation in scalar-tensor theory
Submitted: 2010-12-07, last modified: 2011-04-04
The Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) action has been widely studied as an interesting
example of a model of k-inflation in which the sound speed of the cosmological
perturbations differs from unity. In this article we consider a scalar-tensor
theory in which the matter component is a field with a DBI action. Transforming
to the Einstein frame, we explore the effect of the resulting coupling on the
background dynamics of the fields and the first-order perturbations. We find
that the coupling forces the scalar field into the minimum of its effective
potential. While the additional scalar field contributes significantly to the
energy density during inflation, the dynamics are determined by the DBI field,
which has the interesting effect of increasing the number of efolds of
inflation and decreasing the boost factor of the DBI field. Focusing on this
case, we show, with the benefit of numerical examples, that the power spectrum
of the primordial perturbations is determined by the behaviour of the
perturbations of the modified DBI field.
[114]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0218 [pdf] - 300252
Constraining warm dark matter with cosmic shear power spectra
Submitted: 2010-09-01, last modified: 2011-01-24
We investigate potential constraints from cosmic shear on the dark matter
particle mass, assuming all dark matter is made up of light thermal relic
particles. Given the theoretical uncertainties involved in making cosmological
predictions in such warm dark matter scenarios we use analytical fits to linear
warm dark matter power spectra and compare (i) the halo model using a mass
function evaluated from these linear power spectra and (ii) an analytical fit
to the non-linear evolution of the linear power spectra. We optimistically
ignore the competing effect of baryons for this work. We find approach (ii) to
be conservative compared to approach (i). We evaluate cosmological constraints
using these methods, marginalising over four other cosmological parameters.
Using the more conservative method we find that a Euclid-like weak lensing
survey together with constraints from the Planck cosmic microwave background
mission primary anisotropies could achieve a lower limit on the particle mass
of 2.5 keV.
[115]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.0295 [pdf] - 1042827
Modified Gravity: the CMB, Weak Lensing and General Parameterisations
Submitted: 2010-12-31
We examine general physical parameterisations for viable gravitational models
in the $f(R)$ framework. This is related to the mass of an additional scalar
field, called the scalaron, that is introduced by the theories. Using a simple
parameterisation for the scalaron mass $M(a)$ we show there is an exact
correspondence between the model and popular parameterisations of the modified
Poisson equation $\mu(a,k)$ and the ratio of the Newtonian potentials
$\eta(a,k)$. However, by comparing the aforementioned model against other
viable scalaron theories we highlight that the common form of $\mu(a,k)$ and
$\eta(a,k)$ in the literature does not accurately represent $f(R)$ behaviour.
We subsequently construct an improved description for the scalaron mass (and
therefore $\mu(a,k)$ and $\eta(a,k)$) which captures their essential features
and has benefits derived from a more physical origin. We study the scalaron's
observational signatures and show the modification to the background Friedmann
equation and CMB power spectrum to be small. We also investigate its effects in
the linear and non linear matter power spectrum--where the signatures are
evident--thus giving particular importance to weak lensing as a probe of these
models. Using this new form, we demonstrate how the next generation Euclid
survey will constrain these theories and its complementarity to current solar
system tests. In the most optimistic case Euclid, together with a Planck prior,
can constrain a fiducial scalaron mass $M_{0} = 9.4 \times 10^{-30}{\rm eV}$ at
the $\sim 20 %$ level. However, the decay rate of the scalaron mass, with
fiducial value $\nu = 1.5$, can be constrained to $\sim 3%$ uncertainty.
[116]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.2693 [pdf] - 1034298
Parameterizing scalar-tensor theories for cosmological probes
Submitted: 2010-08-16
We study the evolution of density perturbations for a class of $f(R)$ models
which closely mimic $\Lambda$CDM background cosmology. Using the quasi-static
approximation, and the fact that these models are equivalent to scalar-tensor
gravity, we write the modified Friedmann and cosmological perturbation
equations in terms of the mass $M$ of the scalar field. Using the perturbation
equations, we then derive an analytic expression for the growth parameter
$\gamma$ in terms of $M$, and use our result to reconstruct the linear matter
power spectrum. We find that the power spectrum at $z \sim 0$ is characterized
by a tilt relative to its General Relativistic form, with increased power on
small scales. We discuss how one has to modify the standard, constant $\gamma$
prescription in order to study structure formation for this class of models.
Since $\gamma$ is now scale and time dependent, both the amplitude and transfer
function associated with the linear matter power spectrum will be modified. We
suggest a simple parameterization for the mass of the scalar field, which
allows us to calculate the matter power spectrum for a broad class of $f(R)$
models.
[117]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.5304 [pdf] - 902872
A Quintom scenario with mixed kinetic terms
Submitted: 2009-12-29, last modified: 2010-06-21
We examine an extension of the quintom scenario of dark energy, in which a
canonical scalar field and a phantom field are coupled through a kinetic
interaction. We perform a phase space analysis and show that the kinetic
coupling gives rise to novel cosmological behaviour. In particular, we obtain
both quintessence-like and phantom-like late-time solutions, as well as
solutions that cross the phantom divide during the evolution of the universe.
[118]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.0841 [pdf] - 1025514
The potential of X-ray cluster surveys to constrain primordial
non-Gaussianity
Submitted: 2010-03-03, last modified: 2010-06-16
We present forecasts for constraints on deviations from Gaussian distribution
of primordial density perturbations from future X-ray surveys of galaxy
clusters. Our analysis is based on computing the Fisher-Matrix for number
counts and large-scale power spectrum of clusters. We consider a survey with
high-sensitivity and wide-area to detect about 2.5 x 10^5 extended sources.
Based on the self-calibration approach, and including Planck priors in our
analysis, we constrain 9 cosmological parameters and 4 nuisance parameters,
which define the relation between cluster mass and X-ray flux. Because of the
scale dependence of large-scale bias induced by local-shape non-Gaussianity, we
find that the power spectrum provides strong constraints on the non-Gaussianity
f_nl parameter, which complement the stringent constraints on the power
spectrum normalization, \sigma_8, from the number counts. To quantify the joint
constraints on theese two parameters, that specify the timing of structure
formation for a fixed background expansion, we define the figure-of-merit
FoM_SFT = (det[Cov(sigma_8,f_nl)])^{-1/2}. We find that our surveys constrain
deviations from Gaussianity with a precision of \Delta f_nl~10 at 1 \sigma
confidence level, with FoM_SFT~39. We point out that constraints on f_nl are
weakly sensitive to the uncertainties in the knowledge of nuisance parameters.
As an application of non-Gaussian constraints from available data, we analyse
the impact of positive skewness on the occurrence of XMMU-J2235, a massive
distant cluster discovered at z~1.4. We confirm that in a WMAP-7 Gaussian
Lambda CDM cosmology, within the survey volume, ~5x10^{-3} objects like this
are expected to be found: to increase this probability by a factor of at least
10, one needs to evade either the available constraints on f_nl or sigma_8.
[119]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.0061 [pdf] - 1937604
Euclid Imaging Consortium Science Book
Submitted: 2010-01-04
The energy density of the Universe is dominated by dark energy and dark
matter, two mysterious components which pose some of the most important
questions in fundamental science today. Euclid is a high-precision survey
mission designed to answer these questions by mapping the geometry of the dark
Universe. Euclid's Visible-NIR imaging and spectroscopy of the entire
extragalactic sky will further produce extensive legacy science for various
fields of astronomy. Over the 2008-2009 period, Euclid has been the object of
an ESA Assessment Phase in which the study of the Euclid Imaging instrument was
under the responsibility of the Euclid Imaging Consortium (EIC). The EIC
Science Book presents the studies done by the EIC science working groups in the
context of this study phase. We first give a brief description of the Euclid
mission and of the imaging instrument and surveys. We then summarise the
primary and legacy science which will be achieved with the Euclid imaging
surveys, along with the simulations and data handling scheme which have been
developed to optimise the instrument and ensure its science performance.
[120]
oai:arXiv.org:0910.1934 [pdf] - 902022
Quintessence dynamics with two scalar fields and mixed kinetic terms
Submitted: 2009-10-10, last modified: 2009-12-29
The dynamical properties of a model of dark energy in which two scalar fields
are coupled by a non-canonical kinetic term are studied. We show that overall
the addition of the coupling has only minor effects on the dynamics of the
two-field system for both potentials studied, even preserving many of the
features of the assisted quintessence scenario. The coupling of the kinetic
terms enlarges the regions of stability of the critical points. When the
potential is of an additive form, we find the kinetic coupling has an
interesting effect on the dynamics of the fields as they approach the
inflationary attractor, with the result that the combined equation of state of
the scalar fields can approach -1 during the transition from a matter dominated
universe to the recent period of acceleration.
[121]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.2843 [pdf] - 19519
Slow-Roll Inflation in the Presence of a Dark Energy Coupling
Submitted: 2008-12-15, last modified: 2009-05-18
In models of coupled dark energy, in which a dark energy scalar field couples
to other matter components, it is natural to expect a coupling to the inflaton
as well. We explore the consequences of such a coupling in the context of
single field slow-roll inflation. Assuming an exponential potential for the
quintessence field we show that the coupling to the inflaton causes the
quintessence field to be attracted towards the minimum of the effective
potential. If the coupling is large enough, the field is heavy and is located
at the minimum. We show how this affects the expansion rate and the slow-roll
of the inflaton field, and therefore the primordial perturbations generated
during inflation. We further show that the coupling has an important impact on
the processes of reheating and preheating.
[122]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.4863 [pdf] - 260217
Constraining Modified Gravity and Growth with Weak Lensing
Submitted: 2008-10-27
The idea that we live in a Universe undergoing a period of acceleration is a
strongly held notion in cosmology. As this can, potentially, be explained with
a modification to General Relativity we look at current cosmological data with
the purpose of testing aspects of gravity. Firstly we constrain a
phenomenological model (mDGP) motivated by a possible extra dimension. This is
characterised by $\alpha$ which interpolates between (LCDM) and (the Dvali
Gabadadze Porrati (DGP) model). In addition, we analyse general signatures of
modified gravity given by the growth parameter $\gamma$ and power spectrum
parameter $\Sigma$. We utilise Weak Lensing data (CFHTLS-wide) in combination
with Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs) and Supernovae data. We show that
current weak lensing data is not yet capable of constraining either model in
isolation. However we demonstrate that this probe is highly beneficial, for in
combination with BAOs and Supernovae we obtain $\alpha < 0.58$ and $\alpha <
0.91$ at $1\sigma$ and $2\sigma$, respectively. Without the lensing data no
constraint is possible. Both analyses disfavour the flat DGP braneworld model
($\alpha = 1$) at over $2\sigma$. We highlight these are insensitive to
potential systematics in the lensing data. For the growth signature $\gamma$ we
show that, in combination, these probes do not yet have sufficient constraining
power. Finally, we look beyond these present capabilities and demonstrate that
Euclid, a future weak lensing survey, will deeply probe the nature of gravity.
A $1\sigma$ error of 0.104 is found for $\alpha$ ($l_{max} = 500$) whereas for
the general modified signatures we forecast $1\sigma$ errors of 0.045 for
$\gamma$ and 0.25 for $\Sigma_{0}$ ($l_{max} = 500$), which is further
tightened to 0.038 for $\gamma$ and 0.069 for $\Sigma_{0}$ ($l_{max} = 10000$).
[123]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.0003 [pdf] - 16909
Deconstructing Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A Comparison of Methods
Submitted: 2008-10-01
The Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs) or baryon wiggles which are present
in the galaxy power spectrum at scales 100-150Mpc/h are powerful features with
which to constrain cosmology. The potential of these probes is such that these
are now included as primary science goals in the planning of several future
galaxy surveys. However, there is not a uniquely defined BAO Method in the
literature but a range of implementations. We study the assumptions and
cosmological performances of three different BAO methods: the full Fourier
space power spectrum [P(k)], the `wiggles only' in Fourier space and the
spherical harmonics power spectrum [C(l)]. We contrast the power of each method
to constrain cosmology for two fiducial surveys taken from the Dark Energy Task
Force (DETF) report and equivalent to future ground and space based
spectroscopic surveys. We find that, depending on the assumptions used, the
dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) can change by up to a factor of 35 for a
given fiducial model and survey. We compare our results with the DETF
implementation and, discuss the robustness of each probe, by quantifying the
dependence of the FoM with the wavenumber range. The more information used by a
method, the higher its statistical performance, but the higher its sensitivity
to systematics and implementations details.
[124]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.3140 [pdf] - 1000832
Complementarity of Future Dark Energy Probes
Submitted: 2008-07-20
In recent years a plethora of future surveys have been suggested to constrain
the nature of dark energy. In this paper we adapt a binning approach to the
equation of state factor ``w'' and discuss how future weak lensing, galaxy
cluster counts, Supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillation surveys constrain
the equation of state at different redshifts. We analyse a few representative
future surveys, namely DES, PS1, WFMOS, PS4, EUCLID, SNAP and SKA, and perform
a principal component analysis for the ``w'' bins. We also employ a prior from
Planck cosmic microwave background measurements on the remaining cosmological
parameters. We study at which redshifts a particular survey constrains the
equation of state best and how many principal components are significantly
determined. We then point out which surveys would be sufficiently
complementary. We find that weak lensing surveys, like EUCLID, would constrain
the equation of state best and would be able to constrain of the order of three
significant modes. Baryon acoustic oscillation surveys on the other hand
provide a unique opportunity to probe the equation of state at relatively high
redshifts.
[125]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612663 [pdf] - 316676
Accurate Realizations of the Ionized Gas in Galaxy Clusters: Calibrating
Feedback
Submitted: 2006-12-21, last modified: 2007-07-01
Using the full, three-dimensional potential of galaxy cluster halos (drawn
from an N-body simulation of the current, most favored cosmology), the
distribution of the X-ray emitting gas is found by assuming a polytropic
equation of state and hydrostatic equilibrium, with constraints from
conservation of energy and pressure balance at the cluster boundary. The
resulting properties of the gas for these simulated redshift zero clusters (the
temperature distribution, mass-temperature and luminosity-temperature
relations, and the gas fraction) are compared with observations in the X-ray of
nearby clusters. The observed properties are reproduced only under the
assumption that substantial energy injection from non-gravitational sources has
occurred. Our model does not specify the source, but star formation and AGN may
be capable of providing this energy, which amounts to 3 to 5 x10^{-5} of the
rest mass in stars (assuming ten percent of the gas initially in the cluster
forms stars). With the method described here it is possible to generate
realistic X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster maps and catalogs from N-body
simulations, with the distributions of internal halo properties (and their
trends with mass, location, and time) taken into account.
[126]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0603150 [pdf] - 80359
The Bound Mass of Substructures in Dark Matter Halos
Submitted: 2006-03-06, last modified: 2007-03-06
We present a new definition of subhalos in dissipationless dark matter N-body
simulations, based on the coherent identification of their dynamically bound
constituents. Whereas previous methods of determining the energetically bound
components of a subhalo ignored the contribution of all the remaining particles
in the halo (those not geometrically or dynamically associated with the
subhalo), our method allows for all the forces, both internal and external,
exerted on the subhalo. We demonstrate, using the output of a simulation at
different timesteps, that our new method is more accurate at identifying the
bound mass of a subhalo. We then compare our new method to previously adopted
means of identifying subhalos by applying each to a sample of 1838 virialized
halos extracted from a high resolution cosmological simulation. We find that
the subhalo distributions are similar in each case, and that the increase in
the binding energy of a subhalo from including all the particles located within
it is almost entirely balanced by the losses due to the external forces; the
net increase in the mass fraction of subhalos is roughly 10%, and the extra
substructures tending to reside in the inner parts of the system. Finally, we
compare the subhalo populations of halos to the sub-subhalo populations of
subhalos, finding the two distributions to be similar. This is a new and
interesting result, suggesting a self-similarity in the hierarchy substructures
within cluster mass halos.
[127]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0606552 [pdf] - 82992
The Cosmic Microwave Background and the Ionization History of the
Universe
Submitted: 2006-06-22, last modified: 2006-09-15
Details of how the primordial plasma recombined and how the universe later
reionized are currently somewhat uncertain. This uncertainty can restrict the
accuracy of cosmological parameter measurements from the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB). More positively, future CMB data can be used to constrain the
ionization history using observations. We first discuss how current
uncertainties in the recombination history impact parameter constraints, and
show how suitable parameterizations can be used to obtain unbiased parameter
estimates from future data. Some parameters can be constrained robustly,
however there is clear motivation to model recombination more accurately with
quantified errors. We then discuss constraints on the ionization fraction
binned in redshift during reionization. Perfect CMB polarization data could in
principle distinguish different histories that have the same optical depth. We
discuss how well the Planck satellite may be able to constrain the ionization
history, and show the currently very weak constraints from WMAP three-year
data.
[128]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609028 [pdf] - 84620
Probing Modified Gravity by Combining Supernovae and Galaxy Cluster
Surveys
Submitted: 2006-09-01
Possible explanations of the observed accelerated expansion of the Universe
are the introduction of a dark energy component or the modifications of gravity
at large distances. A particular difference between these scenarios is the
dynamics of the growth of structures. The redshift distribution of galaxy
clusters will probe this growth of structures with large precision. Here we
will investigate how proposed galaxy cluster surveys will allow one to
distinguish the modified gravity scenarios from dark energy models. We find
that cluster counts can distinguish the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati model from a
dark energy model, which has the same background evolution, as long as the
amplitude of the primordial power spectrum is constrained by a CMB experiment
like Planck. In order to achieve this, only a couple of hundred clusters in
bins of width Delta-z = 0.1 are required. This should be easily achievable with
forthcoming Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster counts, such as the South Pole Telescope
in conjunction with the Dark Energy Survey.
[129]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509856 [pdf] - 260650
Statistics of Physical Properties of Dark Matter Clusters
Submitted: 2005-09-28, last modified: 2006-08-30
We have identified over 2000 well resolved cluster halos, and also their
associated bound subhalos, from the output of a 1024^3 particle cosmological
N-body simulation (of box size 320 h^-1 Mpc and softening length 3.2 h^-1 kpc).
This has allowed us to measure halo quantities in a statistically meaningful
way, and for the first time analyse their distribution for a large and well
resolved sample. We characterize each halo in terms of its morphology,
concentration, spin, circular velocity and the fraction of their mass in
substructure. We also identify those halos that have not yet reached a state of
dynamical equilibrium using the virial theorem with an additional correction to
account for the surface pressure at the boundary. These amount to 3.4% of our
initial sample. For the virialized halos, we find a median of 5.6% of halo mass
is contained within substructure, with the distribution ranging between no
identified subhalos to 65%. The fraction of mass in substructure increases with
halo mass with logarithmic slope of 0.44 +- 0.06. Halos tend to have a prolate
morphology, becoming more so with increasing mass. Subhalos have a greater
orbital angular momentum per unit mass than their host halo. Furthermore, their
orbital angular momentum is typically well aligned with that of their host.
Overall, we find that dimensionless properties of dark matter halos do depend
on their mass, thereby demonstrating a lack of self-similarity.
[130]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510453 [pdf] - 76949
Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae
Submitted: 2005-10-15
We show that the current accelerated expansion of the Universe can be
explained without resorting to dark energy. Models of generalized modified
gravity, with inverse powers of the curvature can have late time accelerating
attractors without conflicting with solar system experiments. We have solved
the Friedman equations for the full dynamical range of the evolution of the
Universe. This allows us to perform a detailed analysis of Supernovae data in
the context of such models that results in an excellent fit. Hence, inverse
curvature gravity models represent an example of phenomenologically viable
models in which the current acceleration of the Universe is driven by curvature
instead of dark energy. If we further include constraints on the current
expansion rate of the Universe from the Hubble Space Telescope and on the age
of the Universe from globular clusters, we obtain that the matter content of
the Universe is 0.07 <= omega_m <= 0.21 (95% Confidence). Hence the inverse
curvature gravity models considered can not explain the dynamics of the
Universe just with a baryonic matter component.
[131]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510195 [pdf] - 76691
Constraining Dark Energy with the Dark Energy Survey: Theoretical
Challenges
Annis, James;
Bridle, Sarah;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Evrard, August E.;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Joshua A.;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Kravtsov, Andrey V.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lin, Huan;
Mohr, Joseph;
Stebbins, Albert;
Walker, Terence P.;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Weinberg, David H.;
Weller, Jochen
Submitted: 2005-10-06
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) will use a new imaging camera on the Blanco 4-m
telescope at CTIO to image 5000 square degrees of sky in the South Galactic Cap
in four optical bands, and to carry out repeat imaging over a smaller area to
identify and measure lightcurves of Type Ia supernovae. The main imaging area
overlaps the planned Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey of the South Pole Telescope. The
idea behind DES is to use four distinct and largely independent methods to
probe the properties of dark energy: baryon oscillations of the power spectrum,
abundance and spatial distribution of clusters, weak gravitational lensing, and
Type Ia supernovae. This white paper outlines, in broad terms, some of the
theoretical issues associated with the first three of these probes (the issues
for supernovae are mostly different in character), and with the general task of
characterizing dark energy and distinguishing it from alternative explanations
for cosmic acceleration. A companion white paper discusses the kind of
numerical simulations and other theoretical tools that will be needed to
address the these issues and to create mock catalogs that allow end-to-end
tests of analysis procedures. Although we have been thinking about these
problems in the specific context of DES, many of them are also relevant to
other planned dark energy studies.
[132]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510194 [pdf] - 76690
Dark Energy Studies: Challenges to Computational Cosmology
Annis, James;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Evrard, August E.;
Frieman, Joshua A.;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Kravtsov, Andrey V.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lin, Huan;
Mohr, Joseph;
Ricker, Paul M.;
Stebbins, Albert;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Weinberg, David H.;
Weller, Jochen
Submitted: 2005-10-06
The ability to test the nature of dark mass-energy components in the universe
through large-scale structure studies hinges on accurate predictions of sky
survey expectations within a given world model. Numerical simulations predict
key survey signatures with varying degrees of confidence, limited mainly by the
complex astrophysics of galaxy formation. As surveys grow in size and scale,
systematic uncertainties in theoretical modeling can become dominant. Dark
energy studies will challenge the computational cosmology community to
critically assess current techniques, develop new approaches to maximize
accuracy, and establish new tools and practices to efficiently employ globally
networked computing resources.
[133]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0405445 [pdf] - 64965
Fast Identification of Bound Structures in Large N-body Simulations
Submitted: 2004-05-24, last modified: 2005-09-13
We present an algorithm which is designed to allow the efficient
identification and preliminary dynamical analysis of thousands of structures
and substructures in large N-body simulations. First we utilise a refined
density gradient system (based on DENMAX) to identify the structures, and then
apply an iterative approximate method to identify unbound particles, allowing
fast calculation of bound substructures. After producing a catalog of separate
energetically bound substructures we check to see which of these are
energetically bound to adjacent substructures. For such bound complex subhalos,
we combine components and check if additional free particles are also bound to
the union, repeating the process iteratively until no further changes are
found. Thus our subhalos can contain more than one density maximum, but the
scheme is stable: starting with a small smoothing length initially produces
small structures which must be combined later, and starting with a large
smoothing length produces large structures within which sub-substructure is
found. We apply this algorithm to three simulations. Two which are using the
TPM algorithm by Bode et al. (2000) and one on a simulated halo by Diemand
(2004). For all these halos we find about 5-8% of the mass in substructures.
[134]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409574 [pdf] - 67655
Constraining Dark Energy with X-ray Galaxy Clusters, Supernovae and the
Cosmic Microwave Background
Submitted: 2004-09-24, last modified: 2005-04-05
We present new constraints on the evolution of dark energy from an analysis
of Cosmic Microwave Background, supernova and X-ray galaxy cluster data. Our
analysis employs a minimum of priors and exploits the complementary nature of
these data sets. We examine a series of dark energy models with up to three
free parameters: the current dark energy equation of state w_0, the early time
equation of state w_et and the scale factor at transition, a_t. From a combined
analysis of all three data sets, assuming a constant equation of state and that
the Universe is flat, we measure w_0=-1.05+0.10-0.12. Including w_et as a free
parameter and allowing a_t to vary over the range 0.5<a_t<0.95 where the data
sets have discriminating power, we measure w_0=-1.27+0.33-0.39 and
w_et=-0.66+0.44-0.62. We find no significant evidence for evolution in the dark
energy equation of state parameter with redshift. Marginal hints of evolution
in the supernovae data become less significant when the cluster constraints are
also included in the analysis. The complementary nature of the data sets leads
to a tight constraint on the mean matter density, Omega_m and alleviates a
number of other parameter degeneracies, including that between the scalar
spectral index n_s, the physical baryon density Omega_bh^2 and the optical
depth tau. This complementary nature also allows us to examine models in which
we drop the prior on the curvature. For non-flat models with a constant
equation of state, we measure w_0=-1.09+0.12-0.15 and Omega_de=0.70+-0.03. Our
analysis includes spatial perturbations in the dark energy fluid, assuming a
sound speed c_s^2 =1. For our most general dark energy model, not including
such perturbations would lead to spurious constraints on w_et which would be
tighter by approximately a factor two with the current data. (abridged)
[135]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407294 [pdf] - 66136
Constraints on the Primordial Power Spectrum from High Resolution
Lyman-alpha Forest Spectra and WMAP
Submitted: 2004-07-15, last modified: 2004-11-01
The combined analysis of the cosmic microwave background on large scales and
Lyman-alpha forest on small scales provides a sufficiently long lever arm to
obtain strong constraints on the slope and curvature of the power spectrum of
primordial density fluctuations. We present results from the combination of the
first year WMAP data and the dark matter power spectrum inferred by Viel et al.
(2004) for two different sets of high resolution and high signal-to-noise
quasar absorption spectra: the Croft et al. (2002) sample with a median
redshift z=2.72 and the LUQAS sample (Kim et al. 2004) with a median redshift
z=2.125. The best fit value for the {\it rms} fluctuation amplitude of matter
fluctuations is sigma_8 =0.94 +- 0.08 and n=0.99 +- 0.03, if we do not include
running of the spectral index. The best fit model with a running spectral index
has parameters n=0.959 +- 0.036 and n_run=-0.033 +- 0.025. The data is thus
consistent with a scale-free primordial power spectrum with no running of the
spectral index. We further include tensor modes and constrain the slow-roll
parameters of inflation.
[136]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0410392 [pdf] - 68241
Optimizing the yield of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster surveys
Submitted: 2004-10-15
We consider the optimum depth of a cluster survey selected using the
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect. By using simple models for the evolution of the
cluster mass function and detailed modeling for a variety of observational
techniques, we show that the optimum survey yield is achieved when the average
size of the clusters selected is close to the size of the telescope beam. For a
total power measurement, we compute the optimum noise threshold per beam as a
function of the beam size and then discuss how our results can be used in more
general situations. As a by-product we gain some insight into what is the most
advantageous instrumental set-up. In the case of beam switching observations
one is not severely limited if one manages to set the noise threshold close to
the point which corresponds to the optimum yield. By defining a particular
reference configuration, we show how our results can be applied to
interferometer observations. Considering a variety of alternative scenarios, we
discuss how robust our conclusions are to modifications in the cluster model
and cosmological parameters. The precise optimum is particularly sensitive to
the amplitude of fluctuations and the profile of the gas in the cluster.
[137]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0402149 [pdf] - 62663
Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM?
Submitted: 2004-02-06
We review the evidence for substructures from the anomalous flux ratios in
gravitational lenses. Using high-resolution numerical simulations, we show that
at typical image positions, the fraction of surface mass density in
substructures is <~ 0.5% with mass above 10^{-4} virial masses in the
``concordance'' LCDM cosmology. Substructures outside the virial radius (but
projected at typical lens image positions) only increase the fraction
moderately. Several effects, in particular baryonic settling and the
requirement of compactness, may further decrease the predictions by a factor of
few. The predicted fraction with appropriate properties thus appears to be
lower than that required by lensing, although both are still uncertain. More
speculative substructures such as massive black holes (M ~ 10^5-10^6 solar
masses) in the halo may offer viable alternatives.
[138]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0401340 [pdf] - 62210
Neutral hydrogen surveys for high redshift galaxy clusters and
proto-clusters
Submitted: 2004-01-16
We discuss the possibility of performing blind surveys to detect large-scale
features of the universe using 21cm emission. Using instruments with approx.
5'-10' resolution currently in the planning stage, it should be possible to
detect virialized galaxy clusters at intermediate redshifts using the combined
emission from their constituent galaxies, as well as less overdense structures,
such as proto-clusters and the `cosmic web', at higher redshifts. Using
semi-analytic methods we compute the number of virialized objects and those at
turnaround which might be detected by such surveys. We find a surprisingly
large number of objects might be detected even using small (approx. 5%)
bandwidths and elaborate on some issues pertinent to optimising the design of
the instrument and the survey strategy. The main uncertainty is the fraction of
neutral gas relative to the total dark matter within the object. We discuss
this issue in the context of the observations which are currently available.
[139]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0305568 [pdf] - 57041
Constraining cosmological parameters using Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster
surveys
Submitted: 2003-05-29, last modified: 2003-09-11
We discuss how future cluster surveys can constrain cosmological parameters
with particular reference to the properties of the dark energy component
responsible for the observed acceleration of the universe by probing the
evolution of the surface density of clusters as a function of redshift. We
explain how the abundance of clusters selected using their Sunyaev-Zel'dovich
effect can be computed as a function of the observed flux and redshift taking
into account observational effects due to a finite beam-size. By constructing
an idealized set of simulated observations for a fiducial model, we forecast
the likely constraints that might be possible for a variety of proposed surveys
which are assumed to be flux limited. We find that Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster
surveys can provide vital complementary information to those expected from
surveys for supernovae. We analyse the impact of statistical and systematic
uncertainties and find that they only slightly limit our ability to constrain
the equation of state of the dark energy component.
[140]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307104 [pdf] - 57817
Large Scale Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies and Dark Energy
Submitted: 2003-07-04, last modified: 2003-08-29
In this note we investigate the effects of perturbations in a dark energy
component with a constant equation of state on large scale cosmic microwave
background anisotropies. The inclusion of perturbations increases the large
scale power. We investigate more speculative dark energy models with w<-1 and
find the opposite behaviour. Overall the inclusion of perturbations in the dark
energy component increases the degeneracies. We generalise the parameterization
of the dark energy fluctuations to allow for an arbitrary const ant sound
speeds and show how constraints from cosmic microwave background experiments
change if this is included. Combining cosmic microwave background with large
scale structure, Hubble parameter and Supernovae observations we obtain
w=-1.02+-0.16 (1 sigma) as a constraint on the equation of state, which is
almost independent of the sound speed chosen. With the presented analysis we
find no significant constraint on the constant speed of sound of the dark
energy component.
[141]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0305526 [pdf] - 56999
Revealing the Nature of Dark Energy Using Bayesian Evidence
Submitted: 2003-05-28
We apply the Bayesian concept of `evidence' to reveal systematically the
nature of dark energy from present and future supernova luminosity distance
measurements. We express the unknown dark energy equation of state w(z) as a
low order polynomial in redshift and use evidence to find the polynomial order,
thereby establishing the minimum order required by the data. We apply this
method to the current supernova data, and with a prior -1 < w(z) < 1 and
Omega_m = 0.3 \pm 0.05, obtain a large probability of 91% for the cosmological
constant model, with the remaining 9% assigned to the two more complex models
tested. We also investigate the use of evidence for future supernova data sets
such as distances obtainable from surveys like the Supernova Acceleration Probe
(SNAP). Given a low uncertainty on the present day matter density we find that,
if the underlying dark energy model is only modestly evolving, then a constant
$w(z)$ fit is sufficient. However, if the evolution of the dark energy equation
of state to linear order is larger than |w_1| ~ 0.5, then the evolution can be
established with statistical significance. For models where we can assume the
prior -1 < w(z) < 1, the correct polynomial order can be established even for
modestly evolving equations of state.
[142]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0305465 [pdf] - 56938
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster surveys using a large beam
Submitted: 2003-05-23
Sunyaev Zel'dovich cluster surveys can be used to constrain cosmological
parameters. Extracting clusters from the primary anisotropies and the
unresolved background from very faint clusters is simple when the telescope
beam size is small (1 arcmin), but could be difficult if the beam is larger (8
arcmin). By reference to examples, we show that this is possible by carefully
designing the depth of the survey.
[143]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302306 [pdf] - 54933
Reconstructing the primordial power spectrum
Submitted: 2003-02-17, last modified: 2003-05-16
We reconstruct the shape of the primordial power spectrum from the latest
cosmic microwave background data, including the new results from the Wilkinson
Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and large scale structure data from the two
degree field galaxy redshift survey (2dFGRS). We tested four parameterizations
taking into account the uncertainties in four cosmological parameters. First we
parameterize the initial spectrum by a tilt and a running spectral index,
finding marginal evidence for a running spectral index only if the first three
WMAP multipoles (ell=2,3,4) are included in the analysis. Secondly, to
investigate further the low CMB large scale power, we modify the conventional
power-law spectrum by introducing a scale above which there is no power. We
find a preferred position of the cut at k_c ~ 3e-4 /Mpc although k_c=0 (no cut)
is not ruled out. Thirdly we use a model independent parameterization, with 16
bands in wavenumber, and find no obvious sign of deviation from a power law
spectrum on the scales investigated. Furthermore the values of the other
cosmological parameters defining the model remain relatively well constrained
despite the freedom in the shape of the initial power spectrum. Finally we
investigate a model motivated by double inflation, in which the power spectrum
has a break between two characteristic wavenumbers. We find that if a break is
required to be in the range 0.01 < k Mpc <0.1 then the ratio of amplitudes
across the break is constrained to be 1.23 +/- 0.14. Our results are consistent
with a power law spectrum that is featureless and close to scale invariant over
the wavenumber range 0.005 ~< k Mpc ~< 0.15, with a hint of a decrease in power
on the largest scales.
[144]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0110353 [pdf] - 45410
Constraining dark energy with Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cluster surveys
Submitted: 2001-10-15, last modified: 2002-05-23
We discuss the prospects of constraining the properties of a dark energy
component, with particular reference to a time varying equation of state, using
future cluster surveys selected by their Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect. We compute
the number of clusters expected for a given set of cosmological parameters and
propogate the errors expected from a variety of surveys. In the short term they
will constrain dark energy in conjunction with future observations of type Ia
supernovae, but may in time do so in their own right.
[145]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0106079 [pdf] - 144685
Future Supernovae observations as a probe of dark energy
Submitted: 2001-06-05, last modified: 2002-04-02
We study the potential impact of improved future supernovae data on our
understanding of the dark energy problem. We carefully examine the relative
utility of different fitting functions that can be used to parameterize the
dark energy models, and provide concrete reasons why a particular choice (based
on a parameterization of the equation of state) is better in almost all cases.
We discuss the details of a representative sample of dark energy models and
show how future supernova observations could distinguish among these. As a
specific example, we consider the proposed ``SNAP'' satellite which is planned
to observe around 2000 supernovae. We show how a SNAP-class data set taken
alone would be a powerful discriminator among a family of models that would be
approximated by a constant equation of state for the most recent epoch of
cosmic expansion. We show how this family includes most of the dark energy
models proposed so far. We then show how an independent measurement of
$\Omega_{\rm m}$ can allow SNAP to probe the evolution of the equation of state
as well, allowing further discrimination among a larger class of proposed dark
energy models. We study the impact of the satellite design parameters on this
method to distinguish the models and compare SNAP to alternative measurements.
We establish that if we exploit the full precision of SNAP it provides a very
powerful probe.
[146]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0008314 [pdf] - 144682
Opportunities for future supernova studies of cosmic acceleration
Submitted: 2000-08-21, last modified: 2001-04-25
We investigate the potential of a future supernova dataset, as might be
obtained by the proposed SNAP satellite, to discriminate among different ``dark
energy'' theories that describe an accelerating Universe. We find that many
such models can be distinguished with a fit to the effective
pressure-to-density ratio, $w$, of this energy. More models can be
distinguished when the effective slope, $dw/dz$, of a changing $w$ is also fit,
but only if our knowledge of the current mass density, $\Omega_m$, is improved.
We investigate the use of ``fitting functions'' to interpret luminosity
distance data from supernova searches, and argue in favor of a particular
preferred method, which we use in our analysis.
[147]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0008265 [pdf] - 37581
Cosmic concordance and the fine structure constant
Submitted: 2000-08-17
Recent measurements of a peak in the angular power spectrum of the cosmic
microwave background appear to suggest that geometry of the universe is close
to being flat. But if other accepted indicators of cosmological parameters are
also correct then the best fit model is marginally closed, with the peak in the
spectrum at larger scales than in a flat universe. Such observations can be
reconciled with a flat universe if the fine structure constant had a lower
value at earlier times, which would delay the recombination of electrons and
protons and also act to suppress secondary oscillations as observed. We discuss
evidence for a few percent increase in the fine structure constant between the
time of recombination and the present.
[148]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0004096 [pdf] - 1507833
Bubbles from dark energy ?
Submitted: 2000-04-06
In a model recently proposed by Albrecht and Skordis it was suggested that
the observed accelerated expansion of the universe could be caused by a scalar
field which is trapped in a local minimum of an exponential potential modified
by a polynomial prefactor. We show that scalar field cosmologies with this kind
of local minimum in the potential are stable and do not decay to the true
vacuum if they fulfill the observational constraints from the Type Ia
Supernovae experiments. Further we briefly sketch how this potential could be
related to a potential of interacting D-branes.
[149]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9908033 [pdf] - 107705
Inhomogeneous reionization and the polarization of the cosmic microwave
background
Submitted: 1999-08-04, last modified: 1999-10-07
In a universe with inhomogeneous reionization, the ionized patches create a
second order signal in the cosmic microwave background polarization anisotropy.
This signal originates in the coupling of the free electron fluctuation to the
quadruple moment of the temperature anisotropy. We examine the contribution
from a simple inhomogeneous reionization model and find that the signal from
such a process is below the detectable limits of the Planck Surveyor mission.
However t he signal is above the fundamental uncertainty limit from cosmic
variance, so th at a future detection with a high accuracy experiment on
sub-arcminute scales is possible.
[150]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9808269 [pdf] - 144713
Reionization by active sources and its effects on the cosmic microwave
background
Submitted: 1998-08-24, last modified: 1999-07-30
We investigate the possible effects of reionization by active sources on the
cosmic microwave background. We concentrate on the sources themselves as the
origin of reionization, rather than early object formation, introducing an
extra period of heating motivated by the active character of the perturbations.
Using reasonable parameters, this leads to four possibilities depending on the
time and duration of the energy input: delayed last scattering, double last
scattering, shifted last scattering and total reionization. We show that these
possibilities are only very weakly constrained by the limits on spectral
distortions from the COBE FIRAS measurements. We illustrate the effects of
these reionization possibilities on the angular power spectrum of temperature
anisotropies and polarization for simple passive isocurvature models and simple
coherent sources, observing the difference between passive and active models.
Finally, we comment on the implications of this work for more realistic active
sources, such as causal white noise and topological defect models. We show for
these models that non-standard ionization histories can shift the peak in the
CMB power to larger angular scales.
[151]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9906093 [pdf] - 106814
Early structure formation with cold plus hot dark matter --- a success
of strings plus inflation model
Submitted: 1999-06-04
Quantum fluctuations created during inflation can account for the observed
matter distribution in the linear regime if the universe has two components of
dark matter, one which is cold and collisionless, and the other which is hot
and free streams on small scales. However, this free streaming property of the
hot component prevents early structure formation, and since objects, such as
damped Lyman-$\alpha$ systems, have been observed at high redshift, it is
necessary to produce more power on small scales. Here, we show that the
situation can be improved substantially in models where cosmic strings are
formed at the end of inflation, and in which both inflation and strings
participate in the generation of structure.
[152]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9810203 [pdf] - 103319
Cosmic structure formation in Hybrid Inflation models
Submitted: 1998-10-13
A wide class of inflationary models, known as Hybrid Inflation models, may
produce topological defects during a phase transition at the end of the
inflationary epoch. We point out that, if the energy scale of these defects is
close to that of Grand Unification, then their effect on cosmic structure
formation and the generation of microwave background anisotropies cannot be
ignored. Therefore, it is possible for structure to be seeded by a combination
of the adiabatic perturbations produced during inflation and active
isocurvature perturbations produced by defects. Since the two mechanisms are
uncorrelated the power spectra can be computed by a weighted average of the
individual contributions. We investigate the possible observational
consequences of this with reference to general Hybrid Inflation models and also
a specific model based on Supergravity. These mixed perturbation scenarios have
some novel observational consequences and these are discussed qualitatively.
