sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Webb, D. F.

Normalized to: Webb, D.

13 article(s) in total. 273 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 8,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2001.06683  [pdf] - 2037577
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study Final Report
Gaudi, B. Scott; Seager, Sara; Mennesson, Bertrand; Kiessling, Alina; Warfield, Keith; Cahoy, Kerri; Clarke, John T.; Domagal-Goldman, Shawn; Feinberg, Lee; Guyon, Olivier; Kasdin, Jeremy; Mawet, Dimitri; Plavchan, Peter; Robinson, Tyler; Rogers, Leslie; Scowen, Paul; Somerville, Rachel; Stapelfeldt, Karl; Stark, Christopher; Stern, Daniel; Turnbull, Margaret; Amini, Rashied; Kuan, Gary; Martin, Stefan; Morgan, Rhonda; Redding, David; Stahl, H. Philip; Webb, Ryan; Alvarez-Salazar, Oscar; Arnold, William L.; Arya, Manan; Balasubramanian, Bala; Baysinger, Mike; Bell, Ray; Below, Chris; Benson, Jonathan; Blais, Lindsey; Booth, Jeff; Bourgeois, Robert; Bradford, Case; Brewer, Alden; Brooks, Thomas; Cady, Eric; Caldwell, Mary; Calvet, Rob; Carr, Steven; Chan, Derek; Cormarkovic, Velibor; Coste, Keith; Cox, Charlie; Danner, Rolf; Davis, Jacqueline; Dewell, Larry; Dorsett, Lisa; Dunn, Daniel; East, Matthew; Effinger, Michael; Eng, Ron; Freebury, Greg; Garcia, Jay; Gaskin, Jonathan; Greene, Suzan; Hennessy, John; Hilgemann, Evan; Hood, Brad; Holota, Wolfgang; Howe, Scott; Huang, Pei; Hull, Tony; Hunt, Ron; Hurd, Kevin; Johnson, Sandra; Kissil, Andrew; Knight, Brent; Kolenz, Daniel; Kraus, Oliver; Krist, John; Li, Mary; Lisman, Doug; Mandic, Milan; Mann, John; Marchen, Luis; Marrese-Reading, Colleen; McCready, Jonathan; McGown, Jim; Missun, Jessica; Miyaguchi, Andrew; Moore, Bradley; Nemati, Bijan; Nikzad, Shouleh; Nissen, Joel; Novicki, Megan; Perrine, Todd; Pineda, Claudia; Polanco, Otto; Putnam, Dustin; Qureshi, Atif; Richards, Michael; Riggs, A. J. Eldorado; Rodgers, Michael; Rud, Mike; Saini, Navtej; Scalisi, Dan; Scharf, Dan; Schulz, Kevin; Serabyn, Gene; Sigrist, Norbert; Sikkia, Glory; Singleton, Andrew; Shaklan, Stuart; Smith, Scott; Southerd, Bart; Stahl, Mark; Steeves, John; Sturges, Brian; Sullivan, Chris; Tang, Hao; Taras, Neil; Tesch, Jonathan; Therrell, Melissa; Tseng, Howard; Valente, Marty; Van Buren, David; Villalvazo, Juan; Warwick, Steve; Webb, David; Westerhoff, Thomas; Wofford, Rush; Wu, Gordon; Woo, Jahning; Wood, Milana; Ziemer, John; Arney, Giada; Anderson, Jay; Maíz-Apellániz, Jesús; Bartlett, James; Belikov, Ruslan; Bendek, Eduardo; Cenko, Brad; Douglas, Ewan; Dulz, Shannon; Evans, Chris; Faramaz, Virginie; Feng, Y. Katherina; Ferguson, Harry; Follette, Kate; Ford, Saavik; García, Miriam; Geha, Marla; Gelino, Dawn; Götberg, Ylva; Hildebrandt, Sergi; Hu, Renyu; Jahnke, Knud; Kennedy, Grant; Kreidberg, Laura; Isella, Andrea; Lopez, Eric; Marchis, Franck; Macri, Lucas; Marley, Mark; Matzko, William; Mazoyer, Johan; McCandliss, Stephan; Meshkat, Tiffany; Mordasini, Christoph; Morris, Patrick; Nielsen, Eric; Newman, Patrick; Petigura, Erik; Postman, Marc; Reines, Amy; Roberge, Aki; Roederer, Ian; Ruane, Garreth; Schwieterman, Edouard; Sirbu, Dan; Spalding, Christopher; Teplitz, Harry; Tumlinson, Jason; Turner, Neal; Werk, Jessica; Wofford, Aida; Wyatt, Mark; Young, Amber; Zellem, Rob
Comments: Full report: 498 pages. Executive Summary: 14 pages. More information about HabEx can be found here: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/habex/
Submitted: 2020-01-18, last modified: 2020-01-26
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, has been designed to be the Great Observatory of the 2030s. For the first time in human history, technologies have matured sufficiently to enable an affordable space-based telescope mission capable of discovering and characterizing Earthlike planets orbiting nearby bright sunlike stars in order to search for signs of habitability and biosignatures. Such a mission can also be equipped with instrumentation that will enable broad and exciting general astrophysics and planetary science not possible from current or planned facilities. HabEx is a space telescope with unique imaging and multi-object spectroscopic capabilities at wavelengths ranging from ultraviolet (UV) to near-IR. These capabilities allow for a broad suite of compelling science that cuts across the entire NASA astrophysics portfolio. HabEx has three primary science goals: (1) Seek out nearby worlds and explore their habitability; (2) Map out nearby planetary systems and understand the diversity of the worlds they contain; (3) Enable new explorations of astrophysical systems from our own solar system to external galaxies by extending our reach in the UV through near-IR. This Great Observatory science will be selected through a competed GO program, and will account for about 50% of the HabEx primary mission. The preferred HabEx architecture is a 4m, monolithic, off-axis telescope that is diffraction-limited at 0.4 microns and is in an L2 orbit. HabEx employs two starlight suppression systems: a coronagraph and a starshade, each with their own dedicated instrument.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.04839  [pdf] - 1847092
Historical astronomical data: urgent need for preservation, digitization enabling scientific exploration
Comments: 8 pages, White Paper submitted to ASTRO2020 Decadal Survey
Submitted: 2019-03-12
Over the past decades and even centuries, the astronomical community has accumulated a signif-icant heritage of recorded observations of a great many astronomical objects. Those records con-tain irreplaceable information about long-term evolutionary and non-evolutionary changes in our Universe, and their preservation and digitization is vital. Unfortunately, most of those data risk becoming degraded and thence totally lost. We hereby call upon the astronomical community and US funding agencies to recognize the gravity of the situation, and to commit to an interna-tional preservation and digitization efforts through comprehensive long-term planning supported by adequate resources, prioritizing where the expected scientific gains, vulnerability of the origi-nals and availability of relevant infrastructure so dictates. The importance and urgency of this issue has been recognized recently by General Assembly XXX of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in its Resolution B3: "on preservation, digitization and scientific exploration of his-torical astronomical data". We outline the rationale of this promotion, provide examples of new science through successful recovery efforts, and review the potential losses to science if nothing it done.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1809.09674  [pdf] - 1757320
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study Interim Report
Comments: 212 Pages
Submitted: 2018-09-25
For the first time in human history, technologies have matured sufficiently to enable a mission capable of discovering and characterizing habitable planets like Earth orbiting sunlike stars other than the Sun. At the same time, such a platform would enable unique science not possible from ground-based facilities. This science is broad and exciting, ranging from new investigations of our own solar system to a full range of astrophysics disciplines. The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, is one of four studies currently being undertaken by NASA in preparation for the 2020 Astrophysics Decadal Survey. HabEx has been designed to be the Great Observatory of the 2030s, with community involvement through a competed and funded Guest Observer (GO) program. This interim report describes the HabEx baseline concept, which is a space-based 4-meter diameter telescope mission concept with ultraviolet (UV), optical, and near-infrared (near-IR) imaging and spectroscopy capabilities. More information on HabEx can be found at https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/habex
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.08215  [pdf] - 1738473
Beyond sunspots: Studies using the McIntosh Archive of global solar magnetic field patterns
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-08-24
In 1964 (Solar Cycle 20; SC 20), Patrick McIntosh began creating hand-drawn synoptic maps of solar magnetic features, based on H$\alpha$ images. These synoptic maps were unique in that they traced magnetic polarity inversion lines, and connected widely separated filaments, fibril patterns, and plage corridors to reveal the large-scale organization of the solar magnetic field. Coronal hole boundaries were later added to the maps, which were produced, more or less continuously, into 2009 (i.e., the start of SC 24). The result was a record of $\sim45$ years ($\sim570$ Carrington rotations), or nearly four complete solar cycles of synoptic maps. We are currently scanning, digitizing and archiving these maps, with the final, searchable versions publicly available at NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information. In this paper we present preliminary scientific studies using the archived maps from SC 23. We show the global evolution of closed magnetic structures (e.g., sunspots, plage, and filaments) in relation to open magnetic structures (e.g., coronal holes), and examine how both relate to the shifting patterns of large-scale positive and negative polarity regions.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1806.00644  [pdf] - 1721156
Streamer Blowout Coronal Mass Ejections: Their Properties and Relation to the Coronal Magnetic Field Structure
Comments: 21 pages. 9 figures, accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2018-06-02
We present a comprehensive analysis of a particular class of coronal mass ejection (CME) event, called streamer-blowout CME (SBOs). The events are characterized by a gradual swelling of the overlying streamer, lasting hours to days, followed by a slow, wide CME, generally exhibiting a 3-part structure, which leaves the streamer significantly depleted in its wake. We identify 909 SBO events in the LASCO/C2 observations between 1996 and 2015. The average blowout lasts for 40.5 hours but the evacuation can take days for some events. SBO-CMEs are wider and more massive than the average CME. Their properties generally vary during and between solar cycles. Their minimum (maximum) monthly occurrence rate of one (six) events in cycle 23 has doubled in cycle 24---a probable manifestation of the weaker global fields in the current cycle. The locations of SBOs follow the tilt of the global dipole (but not from 2014 onwards), do not correlate with sunspot numbers and exhibit flux rope morphology at a much higher rate (61%) than regular CMEs (40%). We propose that these characteristics are consistent with SBOs arising from extended polarity inversion lines outside active regions (e.g. quiet sun and polar crown filaments) through the release, via reconnection, of magnetic energy, likely accumulated via differential rotation.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1805.04172  [pdf] - 1680884
Solar Polar Diamond Explorer (SPDEx): Understanding the Origins of Solar Activity Using a New Perspective
Comments: 3 pages, 1 figure. White paper submitted in response to ideas for the Next Generation Solar Physics Mission Concepts
Submitted: 2018-05-10
Our knowledge of the Sun, its atmosphere, long term activity and space weather potential is severely limited by the lack of good observations of the polar and far-side regions. Observations from a polar vantage point would revolutionize our understanding of the mechanism of solar activity cycles, polar magnetic field reversals, the internal structure and dynamics of the Sun and its atmosphere. Only with extended (many day) observations of the polar regions can the polar flows be determined down to the tachocline where the dynamo is thought to originate. Rapid short period polar orbits, using in situ and remote sensing instrumentation, distributed over a small number of spacecraft, will provide continuous 360o coverage of the solar surface and atmosphere in both longitude and latitude for years on end. This unprecedented full coverage will enable breakthrough studies of the physical connection between the solar interior, the solar atmosphere, the solar wind, solar energetic particles and the inner heliosphere at large. A potential implementation, the Solar Polar Diamond Explorer (SPDEx) built upon the Solar Polar Imager mission design, involves up to four small spacecraft in a 0.48-AU orbit with an inclination of 75o. The orbit is achieved using solar sails or ion engines, both technologies already demonstrated in space.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.07750  [pdf] - 1444228
On the Propagation of a Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejection during March 15 -- 17, 2015
Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures, 1 table, accepted by JGR - Space Physics
Submitted: 2016-07-26
The largest geomagnetic storm so far in the solar cycle 24 was produced by a fast coronal mass ejection (CME) originating on 2015 March 15. It was an initially west-oriented CME and expected to only cause a weak geomagnetic disturbance. Why did this CME finally cause such a large geomagnetic storm? We try to find some clues by investigating its propagation from the Sun to 1 AU. First, we reconstruct the CME's kinematic properties in the corona from the SOHO and SDO imaging data with the aid of the graduated cylindrical shell (GCS) model. It is suggested that the CME propagated to the west $\sim$$33^\circ$$\pm$$10^\circ$ away from the Sun-Earth line with a speed of about 817 km s$^{-1}$ before leaving the field of view of the SOHO/LASCO C3 camera. A magnetic cloud (MC) corresponding to this CME was measured in-situ by the Wind spacecraft two days later. By applying two MC reconstruction methods, we infer the configuration of the MC as well as some kinematic information, which implies that the CME possibly experienced an eastward deflection on its way to 1 AU. However, due to the lack of observations from the STEREO spacecraft, the CME's kinematic evolution in interplanetary space is not clear. In order to fill this gap, we utilize numerical MHD simulation, drag-based CME propagation model (DBM) and the model for CME deflection in interplanetary space (DIPS) to recover the propagation process, especially the trajectory, of the CME from $30 R_S$ to 1 AU. It is suggested that the trajectory of the CME was deflected toward the Earth by about $12^\circ$, consistent with the implication from the MC reconstruction at 1 AU. This eastward deflection probably contributed to the CME's unexpected geoeffectiveness by pushing the center of the initially west-oriented CME closer to the Earth.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.05284  [pdf] - 1494761
Relationship of EUV Irradiance Coronal Dimming Slope and Depth to Coronal Mass Ejection Speed and Mass
Comments: 15 pages, 9 figures, ApJ
Submitted: 2016-07-18
Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) coronal dimmings are often observed in response to solar eruptive events. These phenomena can be generated via several different physical processes. For space weather, the most important of these is the temporary void left behind by a coronal mass ejection (CME). Massive, fast CMEs tend to leave behind a darker void that also usually corresponds to minimum irradiance for the cooler coronal emissions. If the dimming is associated with a solar flare, as is often the case, the flare component of the irradiance light curve in the cooler coronal emission can be isolated and removed using simultaneous measurements of warmer coronal lines. We apply this technique to 37 dimming events identified during two separate two-week periods in 2011, plus an event on 2010 August 7 analyzed in a previous paper, to parameterize dimming in terms of depth and slope. We provide statistics on which combination of wavelengths worked best for the flare-removal method, describe the fitting methods applied to the dimming light curves, and compare the dimming parameters with corresponding CME parameters of mass and speed. The best linear relationships found are $$ \begin{align} v_{CME} \Big[\frac{km}{s} \Big] & \approx 2.36 \times 10^6 \Big[\frac{km}{\%} \Big] \times s_{dim} \Big[\frac{\%}{s} \Big] \\ m_{CME} [g] & \approx 2.59 \times 10^{15} \Big[\frac{g}{\%} \Big] \times \sqrt{d_{dim}} [\%]. \end{align} $$ These relationships could be used for space weather operations of estimating CME mass and speed using near-realtime irradiance dimming measurements.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1301.5862  [pdf] - 1159260
Bright Ray-like Features in the Aftermath of CMEs: White Light vs UV Spectra
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2013-01-24
Current sheets are important signatures of magnetic reconnection in the eruption of confined solar magnetic structures. Models of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) involve formation of a current sheet connecting the ejected flux rope with the post eruption magnetic loops. Current sheets have been identified in white light images of CMEs as narrow rays trailing the outward moving CME core, and in ultraviolet spectra as narrow bright features emitting the Fe XVIII line. In this work samples of rays detected in white light images or in ultraviolet spectra have been analyzed. Temperatures, widths, and line intensities of the rays have been measured, and their correlation to the CME properties has been studied. The samples show a wide range of temperatures with hot, coronal and cool rays. In some cases, the UV spectra support the identification of rays as current sheets, but they show that some white light rays are cool material from the CME core. In many cases, both hot and cool material are present, but offset from each other along the UltraViolet Coronagraph Spectrometer (UVCS) slit. We find that about 18% of the white light rays show very hot gas consistent with the current sheet interpretation, while about 23% show cold gas that we attribute to cool prominence material draining back from the CME core. The remaining events have ordinary coronal temperatures, perhaps because they have relaxed back to a quiescent state.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1209.2866  [pdf] - 1151380
Multi-point shock and flux rope analysis of multiple interplanetary coronal mass ejections around 2010 August 1 in the inner heliosphere
Comments: 19 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables, accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2012-09-13
We present multi-point in situ observations of a complex sequence of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) which may serve as a benchmark event for numerical and empirical space weather prediction models. On 2010 August 1, instruments on various space missions (Solar Dynamics Observatory/ Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Solar-TErrestrial-RElations-Observatory) monitored several CMEs originating within tens of degrees from solar disk center. We compare their imprints on four widely separated locations, spanning 120 degree in heliospheric longitude, with radial distances from the Sun ranging from MESSENGER (0.38 AU) to Venus Express (VEX, at 0.72 AU) to Wind, ACE and ARTEMIS near Earth, and STEREO-B close to 1 AU. Calculating shock and flux rope parameters at each location points to a non-spherical shape of the shock, and shows the global configuration of the interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), which have interacted, but do not seem to have merged. VEX and STEREO-B observed similar magnetic flux ropes (MFRs), in contrast to structures at Wind. The geomagnetic storm was intense, reaching two minima in the Dst index (~ -100 nT), caused by the sheath region behind the shock and one of two observed MFRs. MESSENGER received a glancing blow of the ICMEs, and the events missed STEREO-A entirely. The observations demonstrate how sympathetic solar eruptions may immerse at least 1/3 of the heliosphere in the ecliptic with their distinct plasma and magnetic field signatures. We also emphasize the difficulties in linking the local views derived from single-spacecraft observations to a consistent global picture, pointing to possible alterations from the classical picture of ICMEs.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1201.2968  [pdf] - 1092967
Interactions between Coronal Mass Ejections Viewed in Coordinated Imaging and In Situ Observations
Comments: Accepted for publication in ApJ Letters
Submitted: 2012-01-13
The successive coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from 2010 July 30 - August 1 present us the first opportunity to study CME-CME interactions with unprecedented heliospheric imaging and in situ observations from multiple vantage points. We describe two cases of CME interactions: merging of two CMEs launched close in time and overtaking of a preceding CME by a shock wave. The first two CMEs on August 1 interact close to the Sun and form a merged front, which then overtakes the July 30 CME near 1 AU, as revealed by wide-angle imaging observations. Connections between imaging observations and in situ signatures at 1 AU suggest that the merged front is a shock wave, followed by two ejecta observed at Wind which seem to have already merged. In situ measurements show that the CME from July 30 is being overtaken by the shock at 1 AU and is significantly compressed, accelerated and heated. The interaction between the preceding ejecta and shock also results in variations in the shock strength and structure on a global scale, as shown by widely separated in situ measurements from Wind and STEREO B. These results indicate important implications of CME-CME interactions for shock propagation, particle acceleration and space weather forecasting.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:0902.3705  [pdf] - 1001497
Morphology and density of post-CME current sheets
Comments:
Submitted: 2009-02-23
Eruption of a coronal mass ejection (CME) drags and "opens" the coronal magnetic field, presumably leading to the formation of a large-scale current sheet and the field relaxation by magnetic reconnection. We analyze physical characteristics of ray-like coronal features formed in the aftermath of CMEs, to check if the interpretation of this phenomenon in terms of reconnecting current sheet is consistent with the observations. The study is focused on measurements of the ray width, density excess, and coronal velocity field as a function of the radial distance. The morphology of rays indicates that they occur as a consequence of Petschek-like reconnection in the large scale current sheet formed in the wake of CME. The hypothesis is supported by the flow pattern, often showing outflows along the ray, and sometimes also inflows into the ray. The inferred inflow velocities range from 3 to 30 km s$^{-1}$, consistent with the narrow opening-angle of rays, adding up to a few degrees. The density of rays is an order of magnitude larger than in the ambient corona. The density-excess measurements are compared with the results of the analytical model in which the Petschek-like reconnection geometry is applied to the vertical current sheet, taking into account the decrease of the external coronal density and magnetic field with height. The model results are consistent with the observations, revealing that the main cause of the density excess in rays is a transport of the dense plasma from lower to larger heights by the reconnection outflow.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:0802.3616  [pdf] - 10386
A bright coronal downflow seen in multi-wavelength observations: evidence of a bifurcating flux-rope?
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures
Submitted: 2008-02-25
Aims: To study the origin and characteristics of a bright coronal downflow seen after a coronal mass ejection associated with erupting prominences on 5 March 2000. Methods: This study extends that of Tripathi et al. (A&A, v. 449, pp. 369) based on the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT), the Soft X-ray Telescope (SXT) and the Large Angle Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) observations. We combined those results with an analysis of the observations taken by the H${\alpha}$ and the Mk4 coronagraphs at the Mauna Loa Solar Observatory (MLSO). The combined data-set spans a broad range of temperature as well as continuous observations from the solar surface out to 30 R$_{\sun}$. Results: The downflow started at around 1.6R$_{\sun}$ and contained both hot and cold gas. The downflow was observed in the H${\alpha}$ and the Mk4 coronagraphs as well as the EIT and the SXT and was approximately co-spatial and co-temporal providing evidence of multi-thermal plasma. The H${\alpha}$ and Mk4 images show cusp-shaped structures close to the location where the downflow started. Mk4 observations reveal that the speed of the downflow in the early phase was substantially higher than the free-fall speed, implying a strong downward acceleration near the height at which the downflow started. Conclusions: The origin of the downflow was likely to have been magnetic reconnection taking place inside the erupting flux rope that led to its bifurcation.