Normalized to: Wall, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.02617 [pdf] - 1971433
GALEX Absolute Calibration and Extinction Coefficients Based on White
Dwarfs
Submitted: 2019-09-05
We use 1837 DA white dwarfs with high signal to noise ratio spectra and Gaia
parallaxes to verify the absolute calibration and extinction coefficients for
the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX). We use white dwarfs within 100 pc to
verify the linearity correction to the GALEX data. We find that the linearity
correction is valid for magnitudes brighter than 15.95 and 16.95 for the Far
Ultraviolet (FUV) and Near Ultraviolet (NUV) bands, respectively. We also use
DA white dwarfs beyond 250 pc to calculate extinction coefficients in the FUV
and NUV bands; $R_{\rm FUV}=8.01 \pm 0.07$ and $R_{\rm NUV}=6.72 \pm 0.04$.
These are consistent with the predicted extinction coefficients for Milky Way
type dust in the FUV, but smaller than predictions in the NUV. With well
understood optical spectra and state-of-the-art model atmosphere analysis,
these white dwarfs currently provide the best constraints on the extinction
coefficients for the GALEX data.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.06154 [pdf] - 1531664
XENON100 Dark Matter Results from a Combination of 477 Live Days
XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C. D.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-09-20, last modified: 2017-01-12
We report on WIMP search results of the XENON100 experiment, combining three
runs summing up to 477 live days from January 2010 to January 2014. Data from
the first two runs were already published. A blind analysis was applied to the
last run recorded between April 2013 and January 2014 prior to combining the
results. The ultra-low electromagnetic background of the experiment, ~$5 \times
10^{-3}$ events/(keV$_{\mathrm{ee}}\times$kg$\times$day) before electronic
recoil rejection, together with the increased exposure of 48 kg $\times$ yr
improves the sensitivity. A profile likelihood analysis using an energy range
of (6.6 - 43.3) keV$_{\mathrm{nr}}$ sets a limit on the elastic,
spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section for WIMP masses above 8
GeV/$c^2$, with a minimum of 1.1 $\times 10^{-45}$ cm$^2$ at 50 GeV/$c^2$ and
90% confidence level. We also report updated constraints on the elastic,
spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections obtained with the same data. We set
upper limits on the WIMP-neutron (proton) cross section with a minimum of 2.0
$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^2$ (52$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^2$) at a WIMP mass of 50
GeV/$c^2$, at 90% confidence level.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.06262 [pdf] - 1530726
A low-mass dark matter search using ionization signals in XENON100
XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Bruenner, E. Brown S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buss, A.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Galloway, M.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Linde, F.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C. D.;
von Sivers, M.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-05-20, last modified: 2016-12-19
We perform a low-mass dark matter search using an exposure of
30\,kg$\times$yr with the XENON100 detector. By dropping the requirement of a
scintillation signal and using only the ionization signal to determine the
interaction energy, we lowered the energy threshold for detection to 0.7\,keV
for nuclear recoils. No dark matter detection can be claimed because a complete
background model cannot be constructed without a primary scintillation signal.
Instead, we compute an upper limit on the WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section
under the assumption that every event passing our selection criteria could be a
signal event. Using an energy interval from 0.7\,keV to 9.1\,keV, we derive a
limit on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section that excludes WIMPs
with a mass of 6\,GeV/$c^2$ above $1.4 \times 10^{-41}$\,cm$^2$ at 90\%
confidence level.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.07501 [pdf] - 1395004
Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment
The XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P.;
Breskin, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Galloway, M.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
von Sivers, M.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-12-23, last modified: 2016-04-15
The XENON1T experiment is currently in the commissioning phase at the
Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy. In this article we study the
experiment's expected sensitivity to the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon
interaction cross section, based on Monte Carlo predictions of the electronic
and nuclear recoil backgrounds.
The total electronic recoil background in $1$ tonne fiducial volume and ($1$,
$12$) keV electronic recoil equivalent energy region, before applying any
selection to discriminate between electronic and nuclear recoils, is $(1.80 \pm
0.15) \cdot 10^{-4}$ ($\rm{kg} \cdot day \cdot keV)^{-1}$, mainly due to the
decay of $^{222}\rm{Rn}$ daughters inside the xenon target. The nuclear recoil
background in the corresponding nuclear recoil equivalent energy region ($4$,
$50$) keV, is composed of $(0.6 \pm 0.1)$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
radiogenic neutrons, $(1.8 \pm 0.3) \cdot 10^{-2}$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
coherent scattering of neutrinos, and less than $0.01$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$
from muon-induced neutrons.
The sensitivity of XENON1T is calculated with the Profile Likelihood Ratio
method, after converting the deposited energy of electronic and nuclear recoils
into the scintillation and ionization signals seen in the detector. We take
into account the systematic uncertainties on the photon and electron emission
model, and on the estimation of the backgrounds, treated as nuisance
parameters. The main contribution comes from the relative scintillation
efficiency $\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{eff}$, which affects both the signal from WIMPs
and the nuclear recoil backgrounds. After a $2$ y measurement in $1$ t fiducial
volume, the sensitivity reaches a minimum cross section of $1.6 \cdot 10^{-47}$
cm$^2$ at m$_\chi$=$50$ GeV/$c^2$.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07747 [pdf] - 1264865
Exclusion of Leptophilic Dark Matter Models using XENON100 Electronic
Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vitells, O.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
Laboratory experiments searching for galactic dark matter particles
scattering off nuclei have so far not been able to establish a discovery. We
use data from the XENON100 experiment to search for dark matter interacting
with electrons. With no evidence for a signal above the low background of our
experiment, we exclude a variety of representative dark matter models that
would induce electronic recoils. For axial-vector couplings to electrons, we
exclude cross-sections above 6x10^(-35) cm^2 for particle masses of m_chi = 2
GeV/c^2. Independent of the dark matter halo, we exclude leptophilic models as
explanation for the long-standing DAMA/LIBRA signal, such as couplings to
electrons through axial-vector interactions at a 4.4 sigma confidence level,
mirror dark matter at 3.6 sigma, and luminous dark matter at 4.6 sigma.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07748 [pdf] - 1268647
Search for Event Rate Modulation in XENON100 Electronic Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Meng, A. J. Melgarejo Fernandez. Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
We have searched for periodic variations of the electronic recoil event rate
in the (2-6) keV energy range recorded between February 2011 and March 2012
with the XENON100 detector, adding up to 224.6 live days in total. Following a
detailed study to establish the stability of the detector and its background
contributions during this run, we performed an un-binned profile likelihood
analysis to identify any periodicity up to 500 days. We find a global
significance of less than 1 sigma for all periods suggesting no statistically
significant modulation in the data. While the local significance for an annual
modulation is 2.8 sigma, the analysis of a multiple-scatter control sample and
the phase of the modulation disfavor a dark matter interpretation. The
DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation interpreted as a dark matter signature with
axial-vector coupling of WIMPs to electrons is excluded at 4.8 sigma.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.07698 [pdf] - 1342737
Lowering the radioactivity of the photomultiplier tubes for the XENON1T
dark matter experiment
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowksi, M. P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vitells, O.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Laubenstein, M.
Submitted: 2015-03-26
The low-background, VUV-sensitive 3-inch diameter photomultiplier tube R11410
has been developed by Hamamatsu for dark matter direct detection experiments
using liquid xenon as the target material. We present the results from the
joint effort between the XENON collaboration and the Hamamatsu company to
produce a highly radio-pure photosensor (version R11410-21) for the XENON1T
dark matter experiment. After introducing the photosensor and its components,
we show the methods and results of the radioactive contamination measurements
of the individual materials employed in the photomultiplier production. We then
discuss the adopted strategies to reduce the radioactivity of the various PMT
versions. Finally, we detail the results from screening 216 tubes with
ultra-low background germanium detectors, as well as their implications for the
expected electronic and nuclear recoil background of the XENON1T experiment.