Normalized to: Wald, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.00873 [pdf] - 1916951
Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings
Submitted: 2019-06-03, last modified: 2019-06-17
The presence of a bright "photon ring" surrounding a dark "black hole shadow"
has been discussed as an important feature of the observational appearance of
emission originating near a black hole. We clarify the meaning and relevance of
these heuristics with analytic calculations and numerical toy models. The
standard usage of the term "shadow" describes the appearance of a black hole
illuminated from all directions, including from behind the observer. A backlit
black hole casts a somewhat larger shadow. Neither shadow heuristic is
particularly relevant to understanding the appearance of emission originating
near the black hole, where the emission profile and gravitational redshift play
the dominant roles in determining the observed size of the central dark area. A
photon ring results from light rays that orbit near the black hole before
escaping to infinity, where they arrive near a ring-shaped "critical curve" on
the image plane. Although the brightness can become arbitrarily large near this
critical curve in the case of optically thin emitting matter, we show that the
enhancement is only logarithmic, and hence is of no relevance to present
observations. For optically thin emission from a geometrically thin or thick
disk, photons that make only a fraction of an orbit will generically give rise
to a much wider "lensing ring," which is a demagnified image of the back of the
disk, superimposed on top of the direct emission. The lensing ring is centered
at a radius ~5% larger than the photon ring and its width is ~0.5-1M. It can be
relatively brighter by a factor of 2-3 and thus could provide a significant
feature in high resolution images. Nevertheless, the characteristic features of
the observed image are dominated by the location and properties of the emitting
matter near the black hole. We comment on the recent M87* Event Horizon
Telescope observations and mass measurement.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.00859 [pdf] - 1462977
A Variational Principle for the Axisymmetric Stability of Rotating
Relativistic Stars
Submitted: 2016-06-02, last modified: 2016-08-25
It is well known that all rotating perfect fluid stars in general relativity
are unstable to certain non-axisymmetric perturbations via the
Chandrasekhar-Friedman-Schutz (CFS) instability. However, the mechanism of the
CFS instability requires, in an essential way, the loss of angular momentum by
gravitational radiation and, in many instances, it acts on too long a timescale
to be physically/astrophysically relevant. It is therefore of interest to
examine the stability of rotating, relativistic stars to axisymmetric
perturbations, where the CFS instability does not occur. In this paper, we
provide a Rayleigh-Ritz type variational principle for testing the stability of
perfect fluid stars to axisymmetric perturbations, which generalizes to
axisymmetric perturbations of rotating stars a variational principle given by
Chandrasekhar for spherical perturbations of static, spherical stars. Our
variational principle provides a lower bound to the rate of exponential growth
in the case of instability. The derivation closely parallels the derivation of
a recently obtained variational principle for analyzing the axisymmetric
stability of black holes.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.06789 [pdf] - 1415061
A Simple, Heuristic Derivation of our "No Backreaction" Results
Submitted: 2016-01-25
We provide a simple discussion of our results on the backreaction effects of
density inhomogeneities in cosmology, without mentioning one-parameter families
or weak limits. Emphasis is placed on the manner in which "averaging" is done
and the fact that one is solving Einstein's equation. The key assumptions and
results that we rigorously derived within our original mathematical framework
are thereby explained in a heuristic way.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.06452 [pdf] - 1302448
Comments on Backreaction
Submitted: 2015-06-21, last modified: 2015-10-29
We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al.
[arXiv:1505.07800]
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.8084 [pdf] - 898642
How well is our universe described by an FLRW model?
Submitted: 2014-07-30, last modified: 2014-10-16
Extremely well! In the $\Lambda$CDM model, the spacetime metric, $g_{ab}$, of
our universe is approximated by an FLRW metric, $g_{ab}^{(0)}$, to about 1 part
in $10^4$ or better on both large and small scales, except in the immediate
vicinity of very strong field objects, such as black holes. However,
derivatives of $g_{ab}$ are not close to derivatives of $g_{ab}^{(0)}$, so
there can be significant differences in the behavior of geodesics and huge
differences in curvature. Consequently, observable quantities in the actual
universe may differ significantly from the corresponding observables in the
FLRW model. Nevertheless, as we shall review here, we have proven general
results showing that---within the framework of our approach to treating
backreaction---the large matter inhomogeneities that occur on small scales
cannot produce significant effects on large scales, so $g_{ab}^{(0)}$ satisfies
Einstein's equation with the averaged stress-energy tensor of matter as its
source. We discuss the flaws in some other approaches that have suggested that
large backreaction effects may occur. As we also will review here, with a
suitable "dictionary," Newtonian cosmologies provide excellent approximations
to cosmological solutions to Einstein's equation (with dust and a cosmological
constant) on all scales. Our results thereby provide strong justification for
the mathematical consistency and validity of the $\Lambda$CDM model within the
context of general relativistic cosmology.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.0177 [pdf] - 773412
Dynamic and Thermodynamic Stability of Relativistic, Perfect Fluid Stars
Submitted: 2013-08-31, last modified: 2013-12-22
We consider perfect fluid bodies (stars) in general relativity, characterized
by particle number density and entropy per particle. A star is said to be in
dynamic equilibrium if it is a stationary, axisymmetric solution to the
Einstein-fluid equations with circular flow. We prove that for a star in
dynamic equilibrium, the necessary and sufficient condition for thermodynamic
equilibrium (extremum of total entropy S) is constancy of angular velocity
(\Omega), redshifted temperature, and redshifted chemical potential. Friedman
previously identified positivity of canonical energy, E, as a criterion for
dynamic stability and argued that all rotating stars are dynamically unstable
to sufficiently nonaxisymmetric perturbations (the CFS instability), so our
main focus is on axisymmetric stability. We show that for a star in dynamic
equilibrium, mode stability holds with respect to all axisymmetric
perturbations if E is positive on a certain subspace, V, of axisymmetric
Lagrangian perturbations that, in particular, have no Lagrangian change in
angular momentum density. Conversely, if E fails to be positive on V, then
there exist perturbations that can't become asymptotically stationary at late
times. We further show that for a star in thermodynamic equilibrium, the
canonical energy in the rotating frame, E_r, is related to second order changes
in ADM mass, M, and angular momentum, J, by E_r = \delta^2 M - \Omega \delta^2
J. Thus, positivity of E_r for perturbations with \delta J = 0 is a necessary
condition for thermodynamic stability (local maximum of S). For axisymmetric
perturbations we have E = E_r, so a necessary condition for thermodynamic
stability with respect to axisymmetric perturbations is positivity of E on all
perturbations with \delta J = 0, not merely on the perturbations in V. Many of
our results are in close parallel to results of Hollands and Wald for the
theory of black holes.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.5117 [pdf] - 773428
Turning Point Instabilities for Relativistic Stars and Black Holes
Submitted: 2013-10-18, last modified: 2013-12-10
In the light of recent results relating dynamic and thermodynamic stability
of relativistic stars and black holes, we re-examine the relationship between
"turning points"---i.e., extrema of thermodynamic variables along a
one-parameter family of solutions---and instabilities. We give a proof of
Sorkin's general result---showing the existence of a thermodynamic instability
on one side of a turning point---that does not rely on heuristic arguments
involving infinite dimensional manifold structure. We use the turning point
results to prove the existence of a dynamic instability of black rings in 5
spacetime dimensions in the region where $c_J > 0$, in agreement with a result
of Figueras, Murata, and Reall.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.2318 [pdf] - 769751
Examples of backreaction of small scale inhomogeneities in cosmology
Submitted: 2013-04-08, last modified: 2013-06-19
In previous work, we introduced a new framework to treat large scale
backreaction effects due to small scale inhomogeneities in general relativity.
We considered one-parameter families of spacetimes for which such backreaction
effects can occur, and we proved that, provided the weak energy condition on
matter is satisfied, the leading effect of small scale inhomogeneities on large
scale dynamics is to produce a traceless effective stress-energy tensor that
itself satisfies the weak energy condition. In this work, we illustrate the
nature of our framework by providing two explicit examples of one-parameter
families with backreaction. The first, based on previous work of Berger, is a
family of polarized vacuum Gowdy spacetimes on a torus, which satisfies all of
the assumptions of our framework. As the parameter approaches its limiting
value, the metric uniformly approaches a smooth background metric, but
spacetime derivatives of the deviation of the metric from the background metric
do not converge uniformly to zero. The limiting metric has nontrivial
backreaction from the small scale inhomogeneities, with an effective
stress-energy that is traceless and satisfies the weak energy condition, in
accord with our theorems. Our second one-parameter family consists of metrics
which have a uniform Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker limit. This family
satisfies all of our assumptions with the exception of the weak energy
condition for matter. In this case, the limiting metric has an effective
stress-energy tensor which is not traceless. We emphasize the importance of
imposing energy conditions on matter in studies of backreaction.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.1818 [pdf] - 549668
Measure and Probability in Cosmology
Submitted: 2012-02-08
General relativity has a Hamiltonian formulation, which formally provides a
canonical (Liouville) measure on the space of solutions. In ordinary
statistical physics, the Liouville measure is used to compute probabilities of
macrostates, and it would seem natural to use the similar measure arising in
general relativity to compute probabilities in cosmology, such as the
probability that the universe underwent an era of inflation. Indeed, a number
of authors have used the restriction of this measure to the space of
homogeneous and isotropic universes with scalar field matter
(minisuperspace)---namely, the Gibbons-Hawking-Stewart measure---to make
arguments about the likelihood of inflation. We argue here that there are at
least four major difficulties with using the measure of general relativity to
make probability arguments in cosmology: (1) Equilibration does not occur on
cosmological length scales. (2) Even in the minisuperspace case, the measure of
phase space is infinite and the computation of probabilities depends very
strongly on how the infinity is regulated. (3) The inhomogeneous degrees of
freedom must be taken into account (we illustrate how) even if one is
interested only in universes that are very nearly homogeneous. The measure
depends upon how the infinite number of degrees of freedom are truncated, and
how one defines "nearly homogeneous." (4) In a universe where the second law of
thermodynamics holds, one cannot make use of our knowledge of the present state
of the universe to "retrodict" the likelihood of past conditions.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.2997 [pdf] - 494476
Newtonian and Relativistic Cosmologies
Submitted: 2011-11-13, last modified: 2012-02-07
Cosmological N-body simulations are now being performed using Newtonian
gravity on scales larger than the Hubble radius. It is well known that a
uniformly expanding, homogeneous ball of dust in Newtonian gravity satisfies
the same equations as arise in relativistic FLRW cosmology, and it also is
known that a correspondence between Newtonian and relativistic dust cosmologies
continues to hold in linearized perturbation theory in the marginally
bound/spatially flat case. Nevertheless, it is far from obvious that Newtonian
gravity can provide a good global description of an inhomogeneous cosmology
when there is significant nonlinear dynamical behavior at small scales. We
investigate this issue in the light of a perturbative framework that we have
recently developed, which allows for such nonlinearity at small scales. We
propose a relatively straightforward "dictionary"---which is exact at the
linearized level---that maps Newtonian dust cosmologies into general
relativistic dust cosmologies, and we use our "ordering scheme" to determine
the degree to which the resulting metric and matter distribution solve
Einstein's equation. We find that Einstein's equation fails to hold at "order
1" at small scales and at "order $\epsilon$" at large scales. We then find the
additional corrections to the metric and matter distribution needed to satisfy
Einstein's equation to these orders. While these corrections are of some
interest in their own right, our main purpose in calculating them is that their
smallness should provide a criterion for the validity of the original
dictionary (as well as simplified versions of this dictionary). We expect that,
in realistic Newtonian cosmologies, these additional corrections will be very
small; if so, this should provide strong justification for the use of Newtonian
simulations to describe relativistic cosmologies, even on scales larger than
the Hubble radius.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4920 [pdf] - 344257
A new framework for analyzing the effects of small scale inhomogeneities
in cosmology
Submitted: 2010-11-22, last modified: 2011-04-07
We develop a new, mathematically precise framework for treating the effects
of nonlinear phenomena occurring on small scales in general relativity. Our
approach is an adaptation of Burnett's formulation of the "shortwave
approximation", which we generalize to analyze the effects of matter
inhomogeneities as well as gravitational radiation. Our framework requires the
metric to be close to a "background metric", but allows arbitrarily large
stress-energy fluctuations on small scales. We prove that, within our
framework, if the matter stress-energy tensor satisfies the weak energy
condition (i.e., positivity of energy density in all frames), then the only
effect that small scale inhomogeneities can have on the dynamics of the
background metric is to provide an "effective stress-energy tensor" that is
traceless and has positive energy density---corresponding to the presence of
gravitational radiation. In particular, nonlinear effects produced by small
scale inhomogeneities cannot mimic the effects of dark energy. We also develop
"perturbation theory" off of the background metric. We derive an equation for
the "long-wavelength part" of the leading order deviation of the metric from
the background metric, which contains the usual terms occurring in linearized
perturbation theory plus additional contributions from the small-scale
inhomogeneities. Under various assumptions concerning the absence of
gravitational radiation and the non-relativistic behavior of the matter, we
argue that the "short wavelength" deviations of the metric from the background
metric near a point $x$ should be accurately described by Newtonian gravity,
taking into account only the matter lying within a "homogeneity lengthscale" of
$x$. Finally, we argue that our framework should provide an accurate
description of the actual universe.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0509108 [pdf] - 111966
Can the Acceleration of Our Universe Be Explained by the Effects of
Inhomogeneities?
Submitted: 2005-09-27, last modified: 2005-11-14
No. It is simply not plausible that cosmic acceleration could arise within
the context of general relativity from a back-reaction effect of
inhomogeneities in our universe, without the presence of a cosmological
constant or ``dark energy.'' We point out that our universe appears to be
described very accurately on all scales by a Newtonianly perturbed FLRW metric.
(This assertion is entirely consistent with the fact that we commonly encounter
$\delta \rho/\rho > 10^{30}$.) If the universe is accurately described by a
Newtonianly perturbed FLRW metric, then the back-reaction of inhomogeneities on
the dynamics of the universe is negligible. If not, then it is the burden of an
alternative model to account for the observed properties of our universe. We
emphasize with concrete examples that it is {\it not} adequate to attempt to
justify a model by merely showing that some spatially averaged quantities
behave the same way as in FLRW models with acceleration. A quantity
representing the ``scale factor'' may ``accelerate'' without there being any
physically observable consequences of this acceleration. It also is {\it not}
adequate to calculate the second-order stress energy tensor and show that it
has a form similar to that of a cosmological constant of the appropriate
magnitude. The second-order stress energy tensor is gauge dependent, and if it
were large, contributions of higher perturbative order could not be neglected.
We attempt to clear up the apparent confusion between the second-order stress
energy tensor arising in perturbation theory and the ``effective stress energy
tensor'' arising in the ``shortwave approximation.''
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-th/0210001 [pdf] - 116991
Comment on Inflation and Alternative Cosmology
Submitted: 2002-09-30
We respond to, and comment upon, a number of points raised in a recent paper
by Kofman, Linde, and Mukhanov.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0205058 [pdf] - 1237409
An Alternative to Inflation
Submitted: 2002-05-15, last modified: 2002-05-31
Inflationary models are generally credited with explaining the large scale
homogeneity, isotropy, and flatness of our universe as well as accounting for
the origin of structure (i.e., the deviations from exact homogeneity) in our
universe. We argue that the explanations provided by inflation for the
homogeneity, isotropy, and flatness of our universe are not satisfactory, and
that a proper explanation of these features will require a much deeper
understanding of the initial state of our universe. On the other hand,
inflationary models are spectacularly successful in providing an explanation of
the deviations from homogeneity. We point out here that the fundamental
mechanism responsible for providing deviations from homogeneity -- namely, the
evolutionary behavior of quantum modes with wavelength larger than the Hubble
radius -- will operate whether or not inflation itself occurs. However, if
inflation did not occur, one must directly confront the issue of the initial
state of modes whose wavelength was larger than the Hubble radius at the time
at which they were "born". Under some simple hypotheses concerning the "birth
time" and initial state of these modes (but without any "fine tuning"), it is
shown that non-inflationary fluid models in the extremely early universe would
result in the same density perturbation spectrum and amplitude as inflationary
models, although there would be no "slow roll" enhancement of the scalar modes.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9708036 [pdf] - 1462701
A New Method for Determining Cumulative Gravitational Lensing Effects in
Inhomogeneous Universes
Submitted: 1997-08-04, last modified: 1998-05-12
We present a new approach to calculating the statistical distributions for
magnification, shear, and rotation of images of cosmological sources due to
gravitational lensing. In this approach one specifies an underlying
Robertson-Walker cosmological model together with relevant information on the
clumping of matter on scales much smaller than the Hubble radius. The geodesic
deviation equation is then integrated backwards in time until the desired
redshift is reached, using a Monte Carlo procedure wherein each photon beam in
effect ``creates its own universe'' as it propagates. The approach is somewhat
similar to that used in ``Swiss cheese'' models, but the ``cheese'' has been
completely eliminated, the matter distribution in the ``voids'' need not be
spherically symmetric, and the total mass in each void need equal the
corresponding Robertson-Walker mass only on average. We show that when the
matter in the universe consists of point masses, the statistical distributions
of the lensing images are essentially independent of both the mass spectrum and
clustering properties of the point masses, provided that the clustering is
spherical. We apply our results (i) to argue that the positive correlation
recently found between quasar luminosity and the number of absorption line
systems is not likely to be due to lensing, and (ii) to determine the amount of
``noise'' and possible bias produced by lensing in measurements of $q_0$ using
distant supernovae.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9506009 [pdf] - 92799
On the Injection Energy Distibution of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays
Submitted: 1995-06-01
We investigate the injection spectrum of ultra-high-energy (>10^{15} eV)
cosmic rays under the hypotheses that (1) these cosmic rays are protons and (2)
the sources of these cosmic rays are extra-galactic and are homogeneously
distributed in space. The most puzzling aspect of the observed
ultra-high-energy cosmic ray spectrum is the apparent nonexistence of a
``Greisen cut-off'' at about 10^{19.8} eV. We show that this fact could be
naturally explained if most (or all) of the cosmic rays presently observed
above about 10^{19.6} eV were initially injected with energy above the Greisen
cut-off. However, we find that the injection of cosmic rays above the Greisen
cut-off cannot account for the observed flux below about 10^{19.6} eV unless
the injection rate of these particles was enormously higher in the past, as
would be the case if the injection resulted from the decay of an ultra-massive
particle with lifetime of order 10^{9} yr. Even with such a rapid source
evolution, the observed cosmic ray spectrum below about 10^{18.5} eV cannot be
explained in this manner. However, we show that a 1/E^3 injection spectrum can
account for the observed spectrum below 10^{18.5} eV}, with the steepening
observed by the Fly's Eye group between 10^{17.6} eV and 10^{18.5} eV being
very naturally explained by e+ - e- production effects. This latter fact lends
support to the hypothesis that the cosmic rays in this energy regime are
protons. However, due to e+ - e- production effects, a 1/E^3 injection spectrum
cannot account for the observed flux above about 10^{18.5} eV.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9503039 [pdf] - 1469236
Photon Statistics Limits for Earth-Based Parallax Measurements of MACHO
Events
Submitted: 1995-03-08, last modified: 1995-03-12
We analyze the limitations imposed by photon counting statistics on
extracting useful information about MACHOs from Earth-based parallax
observations of microlensing events. We find that if one or more large (say
$2.5\,\rm m$) telescopes are dedicated to observing a MACHO event for several
nights near maximum amplification, then it is possible, in principle, to
measure the velocity of the MACHO well enough to distinguish between disk and
halo populations for events with $\omega {A_m}\!^2 \gta 1\,\rm day^{-1}$, where
$\omega^{-1}$ denotes the timescale of the event and $A_m$ denotes its maximum
amplification. Thus, if it turns out to be possible to reduce all other sources
of error to below that of photon statistics, it may be feasible to do useful
Earth-based parallax observations for high amplification events.
