sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Wakayama, Mariko

Normalized to: Wakayama, M.

3 article(s) in total. 6 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 4,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.07756  [pdf] - 1981844
Glueball scattering cross section in lattice SU(2) Yang-Mills theory
Comments: 9 pages, 9 figures. Full paper of the letter arXiv:1910.01440 [hep-ph]
Submitted: 2019-10-17
We calculate the scattering cross section between $0^{++}$ glueballs of the SU(2) Yang-Mills theory on lattice using the indirect (HAL QCD) method. We employ the cluster-decomposition error reduction technique and use all space-time symmetries to improve the signal. The relation between the interglueball cross section and the scale parameter $\Lambda$ is determined as $\sigma_{\phi \phi}$ = (3.5 - 8.0) $\Lambda^{-2}$ (stat.+sys.). From the observational constraints of galactic collisions, we obtain the lower bound $\Lambda$ > 60 MeV. We also discuss the naturalness of the Yang-Mills theory as the theory explaining dark matter.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.01440  [pdf] - 1973253
Dark matter scattering cross section in Yang-Mills theory
Comments: 4 pages, 2 figures. Letter. It will be followed by a full paper
Submitted: 2019-10-03
We calculate for the first time the scattering cross section between lightest glueballs in SU(2) pure Yang-Mills theory, which are good candidates of dark matter. In the first step, we evaluate the interglueball potential on lattice using the time-dependent formalism of the HAL QCD method, with one lattice spacing. The statistical accuracy is improved by employing the cluster-decomposition error reduction technique and by using all space-time symmetries. We then derive the scattering phase shift and the scattering cross section at low energy, which is compared with the observational constraint on the dark matter self-scattering. We determine the lower bound on the scale parameter of the SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, as $\Lambda$ > 60 MeV.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1401.1212  [pdf] - 791852
Do Giant Molecular Clouds Care About the Galactic Structure?
Comments: 21 pages, 14 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2014-01-06
We investigate the impact of galactic environment on the properties of simulated giant molecular clouds formed in a M83-type barred spiral galaxy. Our simulation uses a rotating stellar potential to create the grand design features and resolves down to 1.5 pc. From the comparison of clouds found in the bar, spiral and disc regions, we find that the typical GMC is environment independent, with a mass of 5e+5 Msun and radius 11 pc. However, the fraction of clouds in the property distribution tails varies between regions, with larger, more massive clouds with a higher velocity dispersion being found in greatest proportions in the bar, spiral and then disc. The bar clouds also show a bimodality that is not reflected in the spiral and disc clouds except in the surface density, where all three regions show two distinct peaks. We identify these features as being due to the relative proportion of three cloud types, classified via the mass-radius scaling relation, which we label A, B and C. Type A clouds have the typical values listed above and form the largest fraction in each region. Type B clouds are massive giant molecular associations while Type C clouds are unbound, transient clouds that form in dense filaments and tidal tails. The fraction of each clouds type depends on the cloud-cloud interactions, which cause mergers to build up the GMA Type Bs and tidal features in which the Type C clouds are formed. The number of cloud interactions is greatest in the bar, followed by the spiral, causing a higher fraction of both cloud types compared to the disc. While the cloud types also exist in lower resolution simulations, their identification becomes more challenging as they are not well separated populations on the mass-radius relation or distribution plots. Finally, we compare the results for three star formation models to estimate the star formation rate and efficiency in each region.