sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Wagner, L.

Normalized to: Wagner, L.

4 article(s) in total. 366 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 8,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1907.07446  [pdf] - 1929897
Resonance strengths in the 14N(p,gamma)15O astrophysical key reaction measured with activation
Comments: Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. C
Submitted: 2019-07-17
The 14N(p,gamma)15O reaction plays a vital role in various astrophysical scenarios. Its reaction rate must be accurately known in the present era of high precision astrophysics. The cross section of the reaction is often measured relative to a low energy resonance, the strength of which must therefore be determined precisely. The activation method, based on the measurement of 15O decay, has not been used in modern measurements of the 14N(p,gamma)15O reaction. The aim of the present work is to provide strength data for two resonances in the 14N(p,gamma)15O reaction using the activation method. The obtained values are largely independent from previous data measured by in-beam gamma-spectroscopy and are free from some of their systematic uncertainties. Solid state TiN targets were irradiated with a proton beam provided by the Tandetron accelerator of Atomki using a cyclic activation. The decay of the produced 15O isotopes was measured by detecting the 511 keV positron annihilation gamma-rays. The strength of the Ep = 278 keV resonance was measured to be 13.4 +- 0.8 meV while for the Ep = 1058 keV resonance the strength is 442 +- 27 meV. The obtained Ep = 278 keV resonance strength is in fair agreement with the values recommended by two recent works. On the other hand, the Ep = 1058 keV resonance strength is about 20% higher than the previous value. The discrepancy may be caused in part by a previously neglected finite target thickness correction. As only the low energy resonance is used as a normalization point for cross section measurements, the calculated astrophysical reaction rate of the 14N(p,gamma)15O reaction and therefore the astrophysical consequences are not changed by the present results.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.02464  [pdf] - 1859121
4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals
de Jong, R. S.; Agertz, O.; Berbel, A. Agudo; Aird, J.; Alexander, D. A.; Amarsi, A.; Anders, F.; Andrae, R.; Ansarinejad, B.; Ansorge, W.; Antilogus, P.; Anwand-Heerwart, H.; Arentsen, A.; Arnadottir, A.; Asplund, M.; Auger, M.; Azais, N.; Baade, D.; Baker, G.; Baker, S.; Balbinot, E.; Baldry, I. K.; Banerji, M.; Barden, S.; Barklem, P.; Barthélémy-Mazot, E.; Battistini, C.; Bauer, S.; Bell, C. P. M.; Bellido-Tirado, O.; Bellstedt, S.; Belokurov, V.; Bensby, T.; Bergemann, M.; Bestenlehner, J. M.; Bielby, R.; Bilicki, M.; Blake, C.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Boeche, C.; Boland, W.; Boller, T.; Bongard, S.; Bongiorno, A.; Bonifacio, P.; Boudon, D.; Brooks, D.; Brown, M. J. I.; Brown, R.; Brüggen, M.; Brynnel, J.; Brzeski, J.; Buchert, T.; Buschkamp, P.; Caffau, E.; Caillier, P.; Carrick, J.; Casagrande, L.; Case, S.; Casey, A.; Cesarini, I.; Cescutti, G.; Chapuis, D.; Chiappini, C.; Childress, M.; Christlieb, N.; Church, R.; Cioni, M. -R. L.; Cluver, M.; Colless, M.; Collett, T.; Comparat, J.; Cooper, A.; Couch, W.; Courbin, F.; Croom, S.; Croton, D.; Daguisé, E.; Dalton, G.; Davies, L. J. M.; Davis, T.; de Laverny, P.; Deason, A.; Dionies, F.; Disseau, K.; Doel, P.; Döscher, D.; Driver, S. P.; Dwelly, T.; Eckert, D.; Edge, A.; Edvardsson, B.; Youssoufi, D. El; Elhaddad, A.; Enke, H.; Erfanianfar, G.; Farrell, T.; Fechner, T.; Feiz, C.; Feltzing, S.; Ferreras, I.; Feuerstein, D.; Feuillet, D.; Finoguenov, A.; Ford, D.; Fotopoulou, S.; Fouesneau, M.; Frenk, C.; Frey, S.; Gaessler, W.; Geier, S.; Fusillo, N. Gentile; Gerhard, O.; Giannantonio, T.; Giannone, D.; Gibson, B.; Gillingham, P.; González-Fernández, C.; Gonzalez-Solares, E.; Gottloeber, S.; Gould, A.; Grebel, E. K.; Gueguen, A.; Guiglion, G.; Haehnelt, M.; Hahn, T.; Hansen, C. J.; Hartman, H.; Hauptner, K.; Hawkins, K.; Haynes, D.; Haynes, R.; Heiter, U.; Helmi, A.; Aguayo, C. Hernandez; Hewett, P.; Hinton, S.; Hobbs, D.; Hoenig, S.; Hofman, D.; Hook, I.; Hopgood, J.; Hopkins, A.; Hourihane, A.; Howes, L.; Howlett, C.; Huet, T.; Irwin, M.; Iwert, O.; Jablonka, P.; Jahn, T.; Jahnke, K.; Jarno, A.; Jin, S.; Jofre, P.; Johl, D.; Jones, D.; Jönsson, H.; Jordan, C.; Karovicova, I.; Khalatyan, A.; Kelz, A.; Kennicutt, R.; King, D.; Kitaura, F.; Klar, J.; Klauser, U.; Kneib, J.; Koch, A.; Koposov, S.; Kordopatis, G.; Korn, A.; Kosmalski, J.; Kotak, R.; Kovalev, M.; Kreckel, K.; Kripak, Y.; Krumpe, M.; Kuijken, K.; Kunder, A.; Kushniruk, I.; Lam, M. I; Lamer, G.; Laurent, F.; Lawrence, J.; Lehmitz, M.; Lemasle, B.; Lewis, J.; Li, B.; Lidman, C.; Lind, K.; Liske, J.; Lizon, J. -L.; Loveday, J.; Ludwig, H. -G.; McDermid, R. M.; Maguire, K.; Mainieri, V.; Mali, S.; Mandel, H.; Mandel, K.; Mannering, L.; Martell, S.; Delgado, D. Martinez; Matijevic, G.; McGregor, H.; McMahon, R.; McMillan, P.; Mena, O.; Merloni, A.; Meyer, M. J.; Michel, C.; Micheva, G.; Migniau, J. -E.; Minchev, I.; Monari, G.; Muller, R.; Murphy, D.; Muthukrishna, D.; Nandra, K.; Navarro, R.; Ness, M.; Nichani, V.; Nichol, R.; Nicklas, H.; Niederhofer, F.; Norberg, P.; Obreschkow, D.; Oliver, S.; Owers, M.; Pai, N.; Pankratow, S.; Parkinson, D.; Parry, I.; Paschke, J.; Paterson, R.; Pecontal, A.; Phillips, D.; Pillepich, A.; Pinard, L.; Pirard, J.; Piskunov, N.; Plank, V.; Plüschke, D.; Pons, E.; Popesso, P.; Power, C.; Pragt, J.; Pramskiy, A.; Pryer, D.; Quattri, M.; Queiroz, A. B. de Andrade; Quirrenbach, A.; Rahurkar, S.; Raichoor, A.; Ramstedt, S.; Rau, A.; Recio-Blanco, A.; Reiss, R.; Renaud, F.; Revaz, Y.; Rhode, P.; Richard, J.; Richter, A. D.; Rix, H. -W.; Robotham, A. S. G.; Roelfsema, R.; Romaniello, M.; Rosario, D.; Rothmaier, F.; Roukema, B.; Ruchti, G.; Rupprecht, G.; Rybizki, J.; Ryde, N.; Saar, A.; Sadler, E.; Sahlén, M.; Salvato, M.; Sassolas, B.; Saunders, W.; Saviauk, A.; Sbordone, L.; Schmidt, T.; Schnurr, O.; Scholz, R. -D.; Schwope, A.; Seifert, W.; Shanks, T.; Sheinis, A.; Sivov, T.; Skúladóttir, Á.; Smartt, S.; Smedley, S.; Smith, G.; Smith, R.; Sorce, J.; Spitler, L.; Starkenburg, E.; Steinmetz, M.; Stilz, I.; Storm, J.; Sullivan, M.; Sutherland, W.; Swann, E.; Tamone, A.; Taylor, E. N.; Teillon, J.; Tempel, E.; ter Horst, R.; Thi, W. -F.; Tolstoy, E.; Trager, S.; Traven, G.; Tremblay, P. -E.; Tresse, L.; Valentini, M.; van de Weygaert, R.; Ancker, M. van den; Veljanoski, J.; Venkatesan, S.; Wagner, L.; Wagner, K.; Walcher, C. J.; Waller, L.; Walton, N.; Wang, L.; Winkler, R.; Wisotzki, L.; Worley, C. C.; Worseck, G.; Xiang, M.; Xu, W.; Yong, D.; Zhao, C.; Zheng, J.; Zscheyge, F.; Zucker, D.
Comments: Part of the 4MOST issue of The Messenger, published in preparation of 4MOST Community Workshop, see http://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2019/4MOST.html
Submitted: 2019-03-06, last modified: 2019-04-01
We introduce the 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), a new high-multiplex, wide-field spectroscopic survey facility under development for the four-metre-class Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) at Paranal. Its key specifications are: a large field of view (FoV) of 4.2 square degrees and a high multiplex capability, with 1624 fibres feeding two low-resolution spectrographs ($R = \lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 6500$), and 812 fibres transferring light to the high-resolution spectrograph ($R \sim 20\,000$). After a description of the instrument and its expected performance, a short overview is given of its operational scheme and planned 4MOST Consortium science; these aspects are covered in more detail in other articles in this edition of The Messenger. Finally, the processes, schedules, and policies concerning the selection of ESO Community Surveys are presented, commencing with a singular opportunity to submit Letters of Intent for Public Surveys during the first five years of 4MOST operations.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.10847  [pdf] - 1613148
Astrophysical S-factor of the $^{14}\textrm{N(p,}\gamma\textrm{)}^{15}\textrm{O}$ reaction at 0.4 -- 1.3\,MeV
Comments: Submitted to Phys. Rev. C
Submitted: 2017-11-29
The $^{14}\textrm{N(p,}\gamma\textrm{)}^{15}\textrm{O}$ reaction is the slowest reaction of the carbon-nitrogen cycle of hydrogen burning and thus determines its rate. The precise knowledge of its rate is required to correctly model hydrogen burning in asymptotic giant branch stars. In addition, it is a necessary ingredient for a possible solution of the solar abundance problem by using the solar $^{13}$N and $^{15}$O neutrino fluxes as probes of the carbon and nitrogen abundances in the solar core. After the downward revision of its cross section due to a much lower contribution by one particular transition, capture to the ground state in $^{15}$O, the evaluated total uncertainty is still 8\%, in part due to an unsatisfactory knowledge of the excitation function over a wide energy range. The present work reports precise S-factor data at twelve energies between 0.357-1.292~MeV for the strongest transition, capture to the 6.79~MeV excited state in $^{15}$O, and at ten energies between 0.479-1.202~MeV for the second strongest transition, capture to the ground state in $^{15}$O. An R-matrix fit is performed to estimate the impact of the new data on astrophysical energies. The recently suggested slight enhancement of the 6.79~MeV transition at low energy could not be confirmed. The present extrapolated zero-energy S-factors are $S_{6.79}(0)$~=~1.24$\pm$0.11~keV~barn and $S_{\rm GS}(0)$~=~0.19$\pm$0.05~keV~barn.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1503.00457  [pdf] - 969853
Cosmic-ray induced background intercomparison with actively shielded HPGe detectors at underground locations
Comments: Minor errors corrected; final version
Submitted: 2015-03-02, last modified: 2015-03-24
The main background above 3\,MeV for in-beam nuclear astrophysics studies with $\gamma$-ray detectors is caused by cosmic-ray induced secondaries. The two commonly used suppression methods, active and passive shielding, against this kind of background were formerly considered only as alternatives in nuclear astrophysics experiments. In this work the study of the effects of active shielding against cosmic-ray induced events at a medium deep location is performed. Background spectra were recorded with two actively shielded HPGe detectors. The experiment was located at 148\,m below the surface of the Earth in the Reiche Zeche mine in Freiberg, Germany. The results are compared to data with the same detectors at the Earth's surface, and at depths of 45\,m and 1400\,m, respectively.