Normalized to: Wagner, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07446 [pdf] - 1929897
Resonance strengths in the 14N(p,gamma)15O astrophysical key reaction
measured with activation
Gyürky, Gy.;
Halász, Z.;
Kiss, G. G.;
Szücs, T.;
Csík, A.;
Török, Zs.;
Huszánk, R.;
Kohan, M. G.;
Wagner, L.;
Fülöp, Zs.
Submitted: 2019-07-17
The 14N(p,gamma)15O reaction plays a vital role in various astrophysical
scenarios. Its reaction rate must be accurately known in the present era of
high precision astrophysics. The cross section of the reaction is often
measured relative to a low energy resonance, the strength of which must
therefore be determined precisely. The activation method, based on the
measurement of 15O decay, has not been used in modern measurements of the
14N(p,gamma)15O reaction. The aim of the present work is to provide strength
data for two resonances in the 14N(p,gamma)15O reaction using the activation
method. The obtained values are largely independent from previous data measured
by in-beam gamma-spectroscopy and are free from some of their systematic
uncertainties. Solid state TiN targets were irradiated with a proton beam
provided by the Tandetron accelerator of Atomki using a cyclic activation. The
decay of the produced 15O isotopes was measured by detecting the 511 keV
positron annihilation gamma-rays. The strength of the Ep = 278 keV resonance
was measured to be 13.4 +- 0.8 meV while for the Ep = 1058 keV resonance the
strength is 442 +- 27 meV. The obtained Ep = 278 keV resonance strength is in
fair agreement with the values recommended by two recent works. On the other
hand, the Ep = 1058 keV resonance strength is about 20% higher than the
previous value. The discrepancy may be caused in part by a previously neglected
finite target thickness correction. As only the low energy resonance is used as
a normalization point for cross section measurements, the calculated
astrophysical reaction rate of the 14N(p,gamma)15O reaction and therefore the
astrophysical consequences are not changed by the present results.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.02464 [pdf] - 1859121
4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals
de Jong, R. S.;
Agertz, O.;
Berbel, A. Agudo;
Aird, J.;
Alexander, D. A.;
Amarsi, A.;
Anders, F.;
Andrae, R.;
Ansarinejad, B.;
Ansorge, W.;
Antilogus, P.;
Anwand-Heerwart, H.;
Arentsen, A.;
Arnadottir, A.;
Asplund, M.;
Auger, M.;
Azais, N.;
Baade, D.;
Baker, G.;
Baker, S.;
Balbinot, E.;
Baldry, I. K.;
Banerji, M.;
Barden, S.;
Barklem, P.;
Barthélémy-Mazot, E.;
Battistini, C.;
Bauer, S.;
Bell, C. P. M.;
Bellido-Tirado, O.;
Bellstedt, S.;
Belokurov, V.;
Bensby, T.;
Bergemann, M.;
Bestenlehner, J. M.;
Bielby, R.;
Bilicki, M.;
Blake, C.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Boeche, C.;
Boland, W.;
Boller, T.;
Bongard, S.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bonifacio, P.;
Boudon, D.;
Brooks, D.;
Brown, M. J. I.;
Brown, R.;
Brüggen, M.;
Brynnel, J.;
Brzeski, J.;
Buchert, T.;
Buschkamp, P.;
Caffau, E.;
Caillier, P.;
Carrick, J.;
Casagrande, L.;
Case, S.;
Casey, A.;
Cesarini, I.;
Cescutti, G.;
Chapuis, D.;
Chiappini, C.;
Childress, M.;
Christlieb, N.;
Church, R.;
Cioni, M. -R. L.;
Cluver, M.;
Colless, M.;
Collett, T.;
Comparat, J.;
Cooper, A.;
Couch, W.;
Courbin, F.;
Croom, S.;
Croton, D.;
Daguisé, E.;
Dalton, G.;
Davies, L. J. M.;
Davis, T.;
de Laverny, P.;
Deason, A.;
Dionies, F.;
Disseau, K.;
Doel, P.;
Döscher, D.;
Driver, S. P.;
Dwelly, T.;
Eckert, D.;
Edge, A.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Youssoufi, D. El;
Elhaddad, A.;
Enke, H.;
Erfanianfar, G.;
Farrell, T.;
Fechner, T.;
Feiz, C.;
Feltzing, S.;
Ferreras, I.;
Feuerstein, D.;
Feuillet, D.;
Finoguenov, A.;
Ford, D.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frenk, C.;
Frey, S.;
Gaessler, W.;
Geier, S.;
Fusillo, N. Gentile;
Gerhard, O.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Giannone, D.;
Gibson, B.;
Gillingham, P.;
González-Fernández, C.;
Gonzalez-Solares, E.;
Gottloeber, S.;
Gould, A.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guiglion, G.;
Haehnelt, M.;
Hahn, T.;
Hansen, C. J.;
Hartman, H.;
Hauptner, K.;
Hawkins, K.;
Haynes, D.;
Haynes, R.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Aguayo, C. Hernandez;
Hewett, P.;
Hinton, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hoenig, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Hook, I.;
Hopgood, J.;
Hopkins, A.;
Hourihane, A.;
Howes, L.;
Howlett, C.;
Huet, T.;
Irwin, M.;
Iwert, O.;
Jablonka, P.;
Jahn, T.;
Jahnke, K.;
Jarno, A.;
Jin, S.;
Jofre, P.;
Johl, D.;
Jones, D.;
Jönsson, H.;
Jordan, C.;
Karovicova, I.;
Khalatyan, A.;
Kelz, A.;
Kennicutt, R.;
King, D.;
Kitaura, F.;
Klar, J.;
Klauser, U.;
Kneib, J.;
Koch, A.;
Koposov, S.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Korn, A.;
Kosmalski, J.;
Kotak, R.;
Kovalev, M.;
Kreckel, K.;
Kripak, Y.;
Krumpe, M.;
Kuijken, K.;
Kunder, A.;
Kushniruk, I.;
Lam, M. I;
Lamer, G.;
Laurent, F.;
Lawrence, J.;
Lehmitz, M.;
Lemasle, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, B.;
Lidman, C.;
Lind, K.;
Liske, J.;
Lizon, J. -L.;
Loveday, J.;
Ludwig, H. -G.;
McDermid, R. M.;
Maguire, K.;
Mainieri, V.;
Mali, S.;
Mandel, H.;
Mandel, K.;
Mannering, L.;
Martell, S.;
Delgado, D. Martinez;
Matijevic, G.;
McGregor, H.;
McMahon, R.;
McMillan, P.;
Mena, O.;
Merloni, A.;
Meyer, M. J.;
Michel, C.;
Micheva, G.;
Migniau, J. -E.;
Minchev, I.;
Monari, G.;
Muller, R.;
Murphy, D.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nandra, K.;
Navarro, R.;
Ness, M.;
Nichani, V.;
Nichol, R.;
Nicklas, H.;
Niederhofer, F.;
Norberg, P.;
Obreschkow, D.;
Oliver, S.;
Owers, M.;
Pai, N.;
Pankratow, S.;
Parkinson, D.;
Parry, I.;
Paschke, J.;
Paterson, R.;
Pecontal, A.;
Phillips, D.;
Pillepich, A.;
Pinard, L.;
Pirard, J.;
Piskunov, N.;
Plank, V.;
Plüschke, D.;
Pons, E.;
Popesso, P.;
Power, C.;
Pragt, J.;
Pramskiy, A.;
Pryer, D.;
Quattri, M.;
Queiroz, A. B. de Andrade;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rahurkar, S.;
Raichoor, A.;
Ramstedt, S.;
Rau, A.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Reiss, R.;
Renaud, F.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rhode, P.;
Richard, J.;
Richter, A. D.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Robotham, A. S. G.;
Roelfsema, R.;
Romaniello, M.;
Rosario, D.;
Rothmaier, F.;
Roukema, B.;
Ruchti, G.;
Rupprecht, G.;
Rybizki, J.;
Ryde, N.;
Saar, A.;
Sadler, E.;
Sahlén, M.;
Salvato, M.;
Sassolas, B.;
Saunders, W.;
Saviauk, A.;
Sbordone, L.;
Schmidt, T.;
Schnurr, O.;
Scholz, R. -D.;
Schwope, A.;
Seifert, W.;
Shanks, T.;
Sheinis, A.;
Sivov, T.;
Skúladóttir, Á.;
Smartt, S.;
Smedley, S.;
Smith, G.;
Smith, R.;
Sorce, J.;
Spitler, L.;
Starkenburg, E.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Stilz, I.;
Storm, J.;
Sullivan, M.;
Sutherland, W.;
Swann, E.;
Tamone, A.;
Taylor, E. N.;
Teillon, J.;
Tempel, E.;
ter Horst, R.;
Thi, W. -F.;
Tolstoy, E.;
Trager, S.;
Traven, G.;
Tremblay, P. -E.;
Tresse, L.;
Valentini, M.;
van de Weygaert, R.;
Ancker, M. van den;
Veljanoski, J.;
Venkatesan, S.;
Wagner, L.;
Wagner, K.;
Walcher, C. J.;
Waller, L.;
Walton, N.;
Wang, L.;
Winkler, R.;
Wisotzki, L.;
Worley, C. C.;
Worseck, G.;
Xiang, M.;
Xu, W.;
Yong, D.;
Zhao, C.;
Zheng, J.;
Zscheyge, F.;
Zucker, D.
Submitted: 2019-03-06, last modified: 2019-04-01
We introduce the 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), a new
high-multiplex, wide-field spectroscopic survey facility under development for
the four-metre-class Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy
(VISTA) at Paranal. Its key specifications are: a large field of view (FoV) of
4.2 square degrees and a high multiplex capability, with 1624 fibres feeding
two low-resolution spectrographs ($R = \lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 6500$), and
812 fibres transferring light to the high-resolution spectrograph ($R \sim
20\,000$). After a description of the instrument and its expected performance,
a short overview is given of its operational scheme and planned 4MOST
Consortium science; these aspects are covered in more detail in other articles
in this edition of The Messenger. Finally, the processes, schedules, and
policies concerning the selection of ESO Community Surveys are presented,
commencing with a singular opportunity to submit Letters of Intent for Public
Surveys during the first five years of 4MOST operations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.10847 [pdf] - 1613148
Astrophysical S-factor of the
$^{14}\textrm{N(p,}\gamma\textrm{)}^{15}\textrm{O}$ reaction at 0.4 --
1.3\,MeV
Wagner, L.;
Akhmadaliev, S.;
Anders, M.;
Bemmerer, D.;
Caciolli, A.;
Gohl, St.;
Grieger, M.;
Junghans, A.;
Marta, M.;
Munnik, F.;
Reinhardt, T. P.;
Reinicke, S.;
Röder, M.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schwengner, R.;
Serfling, M.;
Takács, M. P.;
Szücs, T.;
Vomiero, A.;
Wagner, A.;
Zuber, K.
Submitted: 2017-11-29
The $^{14}\textrm{N(p,}\gamma\textrm{)}^{15}\textrm{O}$ reaction is the
slowest reaction of the carbon-nitrogen cycle of hydrogen burning and thus
determines its rate. The precise knowledge of its rate is required to correctly
model hydrogen burning in asymptotic giant branch stars. In addition, it is a
necessary ingredient for a possible solution of the solar abundance problem by
using the solar $^{13}$N and $^{15}$O neutrino fluxes as probes of the carbon
and nitrogen abundances in the solar core. After the downward revision of its
cross section due to a much lower contribution by one particular transition,
capture to the ground state in $^{15}$O, the evaluated total uncertainty is
still 8\%, in part due to an unsatisfactory knowledge of the excitation
function over a wide energy range. The present work reports precise S-factor
data at twelve energies between 0.357-1.292~MeV for the strongest transition,
capture to the 6.79~MeV excited state in $^{15}$O, and at ten energies between
0.479-1.202~MeV for the second strongest transition, capture to the ground
state in $^{15}$O. An R-matrix fit is performed to estimate the impact of the
new data on astrophysical energies. The recently suggested slight enhancement
of the 6.79~MeV transition at low energy could not be confirmed. The present
extrapolated zero-energy S-factors are $S_{6.79}(0)$~=~1.24$\pm$0.11~keV~barn
and $S_{\rm GS}(0)$~=~0.19$\pm$0.05~keV~barn.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.00457 [pdf] - 969853
Cosmic-ray induced background intercomparison with actively shielded
HPGe detectors at underground locations
Submitted: 2015-03-02, last modified: 2015-03-24
The main background above 3\,MeV for in-beam nuclear astrophysics studies
with $\gamma$-ray detectors is caused by cosmic-ray induced secondaries. The
two commonly used suppression methods, active and passive shielding, against
this kind of background were formerly considered only as alternatives in
nuclear astrophysics experiments. In this work the study of the effects of
active shielding against cosmic-ray induced events at a medium deep location is
performed. Background spectra were recorded with two actively shielded HPGe
detectors. The experiment was located at 148\,m below the surface of the Earth
in the Reiche Zeche mine in Freiberg, Germany. The results are compared to data
with the same detectors at the Earth's surface, and at depths of 45\,m and
1400\,m, respectively.