Normalized to: Von Kienlin, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.06335 [pdf] - 2128303
INTEGRAL discovery of a burst with associated radio emission from the
magnetar SGR 1935+2154
Mereghetti, S.;
Savchenko, V.;
Ferrigno, C.;
Götz, D.;
Rigoselli, M.;
Tiengo, A.;
Bazzano, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Coleiro, A.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.;
Doyle, M.;
Goldwurm, A.;
Hanlon, L.;
Jourdain, E.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Lutovinov, A.;
Martin-Carrillo, A.;
Molkov, S.;
Natalucci, L.;
Onori, F.;
Panessa, F.;
Rodi, J.;
Rodriguez, J.;
Sánchez-Fernández, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Ubertini, P.
Submitted: 2020-05-13, last modified: 2020-07-05
We report on INTEGRAL observations of the soft $\gamma$-ray repeater SGR
1935+2154 performed between 2020 April 28 and May 3. Several short bursts with
fluence of $\sim10^{-7}-10^{-6}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ were detected by the IBIS
instrument in the 20-200 keV range. The burst with the hardest spectrum,
discovered and localized in real time by the INTEGRAL Burst Alert System, was
spatially and temporally coincident with a short and very bright radio burst
detected by the CHIME and STARE2 radio telescopes at 400-800 MHz and 1.4 GHz,
respectively. Its lightcurve shows three narrow peaks separated by $\sim$29 ms
time intervals, superimposed on a broad pulse lasting $\sim$0.6 s. The
brightest peak had a delay of 6.5$\pm$1.0 ms with respect to the 1.4 GHz radio
pulse (that coincides with the second and brightest component seen at lower
frequencies). The burst spectrum, an exponentially cut-off power law with
photon index $\Gamma=0.7_{-0.2}^{+0.4}$ and peak energy $E_p=65\pm5$ keV, is
harder than those of the bursts usually observed from this and other magnetars.
By the analysis of an expanding dust scattering ring seen in X-rays with the
{\it Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory} XRT instrument, we derived a distance of
4.4$_{-1.3}^{+2.8}$ kpc for SGR 1935+2154, independent of its possible
association with the supernova remnant G57.2+0.8. At this distance, the burst
20-200 keV fluence of $(6.1\pm 0.3)\times10^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ corresponds to
an isotropic emitted energy of $\sim1.4\times10^{39}$ erg. This is the first
burst with a radio counterpart observed from a soft $\gamma$-ray repeater and
it strongly supports models based on magnetars that have been proposed for
extragalactic fast radio bursts.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07251 [pdf] - 2113441
Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long $\gamma$-ray burst
Acciari, V. A.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Engels, A. Arbet;
Baack, D.;
Babić, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bellizzi, L.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berti, A.;
Besenrieder, J.;
Bhattacharyya, W.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bošnjak, Ž.;
Busetto, G.;
Carosi, R.;
Ceribella, G.;
Chai, Y.;
Chilingaryan, A.;
Cikota, S.;
Colak, S. M.;
Colin, U.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Delfino, M.;
Delgado, J.;
Depaoli, D.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Espiñeira, E. Do Souto;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Donini, A.;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fattorini, A.;
Ferrara, G.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Foffano, L.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Fruck, C.;
Fukami, S.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gasparyan, S.;
Gaug, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Godinović, N.;
Green, D.;
Guberman, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Herrera, J.;
Hoang, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hütten, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inoue, S.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jouvin, L.;
Kerszberg, D.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
Lamastra, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Leone, F.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
López-Oramas, A.;
Loporchio, S.;
Fraga, B. Machado de Oliveira;
Maggio, C.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Mićanović, S.;
Miceli, D.;
Minev, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Molina, E.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende, D.;
Moreno, V.;
Moretti, E.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Neustroev, V.;
Nigro, C.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninci, D.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogués, L.;
Nozaki, S.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Peñil, P.;
Peresano, M.;
Persic, M.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Righi, C.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Saha, L.;
Sahakyan, N.;
Saito, T.;
Sakurai, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sitarek, J.;
Šnidarić, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Somero, A.;
Stamerra, A.;
Strom, D.;
Strzys, M.;
Suda, Y.;
Surić, T.;
Takahashi, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres-Albà, N.;
Tosti, L.;
Vagelli, V.;
van Scherpenberg, J.;
Vanzo, G.;
Acosta, M. Vazquez;
Vigorito, C. F.;
Vitale, V.;
Vovk, I.;
Will, M.;
Zarić, D.;
Nava, L.;
Veres, P.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Arimoto, M.;
Tak, D.;
Asano, K.;
Axelsson, M.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Gill, R.;
Granot, J.;
McEnery, J.;
Razzaque, S.;
Piron, F.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Campana, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
O'Brien, P.;
Capalbi, M.;
D'Aì, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Starling, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
Ursi, A.;
Tavani, M.;
Cardillo, M.;
Casentini, C.;
Piano, G.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Pittori, C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Parmiggiani, N.;
Anderson, G. E.;
Anderson, J. P.;
Bernardi, G.;
Bolmer, J.;
Caballero-García, M. D.;
Carrasco, I. M.;
Castellón, A.;
Segura, N. Castro;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Cherukuri, S. V.;
Cockeram, A. M.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Di Dato, A.;
Diretse, R.;
Fender, R. P.;
Fernández-García, E.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Greiner, J.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Heintz, K. E.;
Heywood, I.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Inserra, C.;
Izzo, L.;
Jaiswal, V.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Japelj, J.;
Kankare, E.;
Kann, D. A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Klose, S.;
Levan, A. J.;
Li, X. Y.;
Lotti, S.;
Maguire, K.;
Malesani, D. B.;
Manulis, I.;
Marongiu, M.;
Martin, S.;
Melandri, A.;
Michałowski, M.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Misra, K.;
Moin, A.;
Mooley, K. P.;
Nasri, S.;
Nicholl, M.;
Noschese, A.;
Novara, G.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Peretti, E.;
del Pulgar, C. J. Pérez;
Pérez-Torres, M. A.;
Perley, D. A.;
Piro, L.;
Ragosta, F.;
Resmi, L.;
Ricci, R.;
Rossi, A.;
Sánchez-Ramírez, R.;
Selsing, J.;
Schulze, S.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, I. A.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Stevens, J.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Thóne, C. C.;
Tiengo, A.;
Tremou, E.;
Troja, E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Vergani, S. D.;
Wieringa, M.;
Woudt, P. A.;
Xu, D.;
Yaron, O.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) originate from ultra-relativistic jets
launched from the collapsing cores of dying massive stars. They are
characterised by an initial phase of bright and highly variable radiation in
the keV-MeV band that is likely produced within the jet and lasts from
milliseconds to minutes, known as the prompt emission. Subsequently, the
interaction of the jet with the external medium generates external shock waves,
responsible for the afterglow emission, which lasts from days to months, and
occurs over a broad energy range, from the radio to the GeV bands. The
afterglow emission is generally well explained as synchrotron radiation by
electrons accelerated at the external shock. Recently, an intense, long-lasting
emission between 0.2 and 1 TeV was observed from the GRB 190114C. Here we
present the results of our multi-frequency observational campaign of
GRB~190114C, and study the evolution in time of the GRB emission across 17
orders of magnitude in energy, from $5\times10^{-6}$ up to $10^{12}$\,eV. We
find that the broadband spectral energy distribution is double-peaked, with the
TeV emission constituting a distinct spectral component that has power
comparable to the synchrotron component. This component is associated with the
afterglow, and is satisfactorily explained by inverse Compton upscattering of
synchrotron photons by high-energy electrons. We find that the conditions
required to account for the observed TeV component are not atypical, supporting
the possibility that inverse Compton emission is commonly produced in GRBs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.03006 [pdf] - 2105547
Evaluation of Automated Fermi GBM Localizations of Gamma-ray Bursts
Goldstein, Adam;
Fletcher, Corinne;
Veres, Peter;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Cleveland, William H.;
Gibby, Melissa H.;
Hui, C. Michelle;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burns, Eric;
Hamburg, Rachel;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Malacaria, Christian;
Paciesas, William S.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2019-09-06, last modified: 2020-04-19
The capability of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) to localize
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is evaluated for two different automated algorithms:
the GBM Team's RoboBA algorithm and the independently developed BALROG
algorithm. Through a systematic study utilizing over 500 GRBs with known
locations from instruments like Swift and the Fermi LAT, we directly compare
the effectiveness of, and accurately estimate the systematic uncertainty for,
both algorithms. We show simple adjustments to the GBM Team's RoboBA, in
operation since early 2016, yields significant improvement in the systematic
uncertainty, removing the long tail identified in the systematic, and improves
the overall accuracy. The systematic uncertainty for the updated RoboBA
localizations is $1.8^\circ$ for 52% of GRBs and $4.1^\circ$ for the remaining
48%. Both from public reporting by BALROG and our systematic study, we find the
systematic uncertainty of $1-2^\circ$ quoted in GCN circulars for bright GRBs
localized by BALROG is an underestimate of the true magnitude of the
systematic, which we find to be $2.7^\circ$ for 74% of GRBs and $33^\circ$ for
the remaining 26%. We show that, once the systematic uncertainty is considered,
the RoboBA 90% localization confidence regions can be more than an order of
magnitude smaller in area than those produced by BALROG.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11460 [pdf] - 2078735
The Fourth Fermi-GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: A Decade of Data
von Kienlin, A.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burns, E.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Kocevski, D.;
Mailyan, B.;
Malacaria, C.;
Poolakkil, S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Veres, P.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2020-02-26, last modified: 2020-04-14
We present the fourth in a series of catalogs of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
observed with Fermi's Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (Fermi-GBM). It extends the six
year catalog by four more years, now covering the ten year time period from
trigger enabling on 2008 July 12 to 2018 July 11. During this time period GBM
triggered almost twice a day on transient events of which we identifyied 2356
as cosmic GRBs. Additional trigger events were due to solar are events,
magnetar burst activities, and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes. The intention of
the GBM GRB catalog series is to provide updated information to the community
on the most important observables of the GBM-detected GRBs. For each GRB the
location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak
flux, and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the
50-300 keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the
instrument reference system is observed and also for a broader energy band from
10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy detectors.
Furthermore, information is given on the settings of the triggering criteria
and exceptional operational conditions during years 7 to 10 in the mission.
This fourth catalog is an official product of the Fermi-GBM science team, and
the data files containing the complete results are available from the
High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.10605 [pdf] - 2050215
Fermi and Swift Observations of GRB 190114C: Tracing the Evolution of
High-Energy Emission from Prompt to Afterglow
Ajello, M.;
Arimoto, M.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Berretta, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bottacini, E.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Burns, E.;
Buson, S.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Chen, S.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Costantin, D.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
DeKlotz, M.;
Luque, P. de la Torre;
de Palma, F.;
Desai, A.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Venere, L.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Fegan, S. J.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Gill, R.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Granot, J.;
Green, D.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Grondin, M. H.;
Guiriec, S.;
Hays, E.;
Horan, D.;
Jóhannesson, G.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kovac'evic', M.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Lemoine-Goumard, M.;
Li, J.;
Liodakis, I.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lovellette, M. N.;
Lubrano, P.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
Manfreda, A.;
Martí-Devesa, G.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Mereu, I.;
Meyer, M.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mitthumsiri, W.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Moretti, E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paliya, V. S.;
Paneque, D.;
Pei, Z.;
Persic, M.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Petrosian, V.;
Piron, F.;
Poon, H.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Rainò, S.;
Rando, R.;
Rani, B.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Ryde, F.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Serini, D.;
Sgrò, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Tajima, H.;
Takagi, K.;
Takahashi, M. N.;
Tak, D.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Valverde, J.;
Van Klaveren, B.;
Wood, K.;
Yassine, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W.;
Giles, M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hui, M.;
Malacaria, C.;
Preece, R.;
Roberts, O.;
Veres, P.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cenko, S. B.;
O'Brien, P.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Lien, A.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
D'Elia, V.;
D'A, A.;
Perri, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Capalbi, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Stamatikos, M.
Submitted: 2019-09-23, last modified: 2020-01-23
We report on the observations of gamma-ray burst (GRB) 190114C by the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. The
early-time observations reveal multiple emission components that evolve
independently, with a delayed power-law component that exhibits significant
spectral attenuation above 40 MeV in the first few seconds of the burst. This
power-law component transitions to a harder spectrum that is consistent with
the afterglow emission observed at later times. This afterglow component is
clearly identifiable in the GBM and BAT light curves as a slowly fading
emission component on which the rest of the prompt emission is superimposed. As
a result, we are able to constrain the transition from internal shock to
external shock dominated emission. We find that the temporal and spectral
evolution of the broadband afterglow emission can be well modeled as
synchrotron emission from a forward shock propagating into a wind-like
circumstellar environment and find that high-energy photons observed by Fermi
LAT are in tension with the theoretical maximum energy that can be achieved
through synchrotron emission from a shock. These violations of the maximum
synchrotron energy are further compounded by the detection of very high energy
(VHE) emission above 300 GeV by MAGIC concurrent with our observations. We
conclude that the observations of VHE photons from GRB 190114C necessitates
either an additional emission mechanism at very high energies that is hidden in
the synchrotron component in the LAT energy range, an acceleration mechanism
that imparts energy to the particles at a rate that is faster than the electron
synchrotron energy loss rate, or revisions of the fundamental assumptions used
in estimating the maximum photon energy attainable through the synchrotron
process.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.06158 [pdf] - 1878715
Fermi GBM GRBs with characteristics similar to GRB 170817A
von Kienlin, A.;
Veres, P.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Hamburg, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Preece, R. D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Malacaria, C.
Submitted: 2019-01-18, last modified: 2019-04-18
We present a search for gamma-ray bursts in the Fermi-GBM 10 year catalog
that show similar characteristics to GRB 170817A, the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a GRB identified as a binary neutron star (BNS) merger via
gravitational wave observations. Our search is focused on a non-thermal pulse,
followed by a thermal component, as observed for GRB 170817A. We employ search
methods based on the measured catalog parameters and Bayesian Block analysis.
Our multi-pronged approach, which includes examination of the localization and
spectral properties of the thermal component, yields a total of 13 candidates,
including GRB 170817A and the previously reported similar burst, GRB 150101B.
The similarity of the candidates is likely caused by the same processes that
shaped the gamma-ray signal of GRB 170817A, thus providing evidence of a nearby
sample of short GRBs resulting from BNS merger events. Some of the newly
identfied counterparts were observed by other space telescopes and ground
observatories, but none of them have a measured redshift. We present an
analysis of this sub-sample, and we discuss two models. From uncovering 13
candidates during a time period of ten years we predict that Fermi-GBM will
trigger on-board on about one burst similar to GRB 170817A per year.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.09431 [pdf] - 1775655
Magnetic shielding of soft protons in future X-ray telescopes: the case
of the ATHENA Wide Field Imager
Fioretti, Valentina;
Bulgarelli, Andrea;
Molendi, Silvano;
Lotti, Simone;
Macculi, Claudio;
Barbera, Marco;
Mineo, Teresa;
Piro, Luigi;
Cappi, Massimo;
Dadina, Mauro;
Meidinger, Norbert;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Rau, Arne
Submitted: 2018-08-28
Both the interplanetary space and the Earth magnetosphere are populated by
low energy ($\leq300$ keV) protons that are potentially able to scatter on the
reflecting surface of Wolter-I optics of X-ray focusing telescopes and reach
the focal plane. This phenomenon, depending on the X-ray instrumentation, can
dramatically increase the background level, reducing the sensitivity or, in the
most extreme cases, compromising the observation itself. The use of a magnetic
diverter, deflecting protons away from the field of view, requires a detailed
characterization of their angular and energy distribution when exiting the
mirror. We present the first end-to-end Geant4 simulation of proton scattering
by X-ray optics and the consequent interaction with the diverter field and the
X-ray detector assembly, selecting the ATHENA Wide Field Imager as a case study
for the evaluation of the residual soft proton induced background. We obtain
that, in absence of a magnetic diverter, protons are indeed funneled towards
the focal plane, with a focused Non X-ray Background well above the level
required by ATHENA science objectives ($5\times10^{-4}$ counts cm$^{-2}$
s$^{-1}$ keV$^{-1}$), for all the plasma regimes encountered in both L1 and L2
orbits. These results set the proton diverter as a mandatory shielding system
on board the ATHENA mission and all high throughput X-ray telescopes operating
in the interplanetary space. For a magnetic field computed to deflect 99\% of
the protons that would otherwise reach the WFI, Geant4 simulations show that
this configuration, in the assumption of a uniform field, would efficiently
shield the focal plane, yielding a residual background level of the order or
below the requirement.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.02866 [pdf] - 1740032
Fermi GBM Observations of GRB 150101B: A Second Nearby Event with a
Short Hard Spike and a Soft Tail
Burns, E.;
Veres, P.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
McEnery, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Hui, C. M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mailyan, B.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Siellez, K.;
Stanbro, M.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2018-07-08, last modified: 2018-08-06
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star
merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as
GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the
closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of
a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent
two-component nature is phenomenologically similar to that of GRB 170817A.
While GRB 170817A was distinct from the previously known population of short
gamma-ray bursts in terms of its prompt intrinsic energetics, GRB 150101B is
not. Despite these differences, GRB 150101B can be modeled as a more on-axis
version of GRB 170817A. Identifying a similar signature in two of the closest
short gamma-ray bursts suggests the soft tail is common, but generally
undetectable in more distant events. If so, it will be possible to identify
nearby short gamma-ray bursts from the prompt gamma-ray emission alone, aiding
the search for kilonovae.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.05359 [pdf] - 1618459
INTEGRAL results on the electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational
waves
Mereghetti, S.;
Savchenko, V.;
Ferrigno, C.;
Kuulkers, E.;
Ubertini, P.;
Bazzano, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Brandt, S.;
Chenevez, J.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.;
Diehl, R.;
Hanlon, L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Laurent, P.;
Lebrun, F.;
Lutovinov, A.;
Martin-Carrillo, A.;
Natalucci, L.;
Roques, J. P.;
Siegert, T.;
Sunyaev, R.
Submitted: 2018-01-16
Thanks to its high orbit and a set of complementary detectors providing
continuous coverage of the whole sky, the INTEGRAL satellite has unique
capabilities for the identification and study of the electromagnetic radiation
associated to gravitational waves signals and, more generally, for
multi-messenger astrophysics. Here we briefly review the results obtained
during the first two observing runs of the advanced LIGO/Virgo interferometers.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02305 [pdf] - 1630338
On the interpretation of the Fermi GBM transient observed in coincidence
with LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Kocevski, D.;
Littenberg, T.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Racusin, J.;
Shawhan, P.;
Veitch, J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W.;
Giles, M. M.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Stanbro, M.;
Veres, P.
Submitted: 2018-01-07
The weak transient detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 s
after GW150914 has generated much speculation regarding its possible
association with the black-hole binary merger. Investigation of the GBM data by
Connaughton et al. (2016) revealed a source location consistent with GW150914
and a spectrum consistent with a weak, short Gamma-Ray Burst.
Greiner et al. (2016) present an alternative technique for fitting
background-limited data in the low-count regime, and call into question the
spectral analysis and the significance of the detection of GW150914-GBM
presented in Connaughton et al. (2016). The spectral analysis of Connaughton et
al. (2016) is not subject to the limitations of the low-count regime noted by
Greiner et al. (2016). We find Greiner et al. (2016) used an inconsistent
source position and did not follow the steps taken in Connaughton et al. (2016)
to mitigate the statistical shortcomings of their software when analyzing this
weak event. We use the approach of Greiner et al. (2016) to verify that our
original spectral analysis is not biased.
The detection significance of GW150914-GBM is established empirically, with a
False Alarm Rate (FAR) of $\sim 10^{-4}$~Hz. A post-trials False Alarm
Probability (FAP) of $2.2 \times 10^{-3}$ ($2.9 \sigma$) of this transient
being associated with GW150914 is based on the proximity in time to the GW
event of a transient with that FAR. The FAR and the FAP are unaffected by the
spectral analysis that is the focus of Greiner et al. (2016).
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05449 [pdf] - 1589766
INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with
the Gravitational Wave Event GW170817
Savchenko, V.;
Ferrigno, C.;
Kuulkers, E.;
Bazzano, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Brandt, S.;
Chenevez, J.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.;
Diehl, R.;
Domingo, A.;
Hanlon, L.;
Jourdain, E.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Laurent, P.;
Lebrun, F.;
Lutovinov, A.;
Martin-Carrillo, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Natalucci, L.;
Rodi, J.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Ubertini, P.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We report the e INTernational Gamma-ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL)
detection of the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A (discovered by Fermi-GBM)
with a signal-to-noise ratio of 4.6, and, for the first time, its association
with the gravitational waves (GWs) from binary neutron star (BNS) merging event
GW170817 detected by the LIGO and Virgo observatories. The significance of
association between the gamma-ray burst observed by INTEGRAL and GW170817 is
3.2 $\sigma$, while the association between the Fermi-GBM and INTEGRAL
detections is 4.2 $\sigma$. GRB 170817A was detected by the SPI-ACS instrument
about 2 s after the end of the gravitational wave event. We measure a fluence
of $(1.4 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.6) \times$10$^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2})$ (75--2000 keV),
where, respectively, the statistical error is given at the 1 $\sigma$
confidence level, and the systematic error corresponds to the uncertainty in
the spectral model and instrument response.
We also report on the pointed follow-up observations carried out by INTEGRAL,
starting 19.5 h after the event, and lasting for 5.4 days. We provide a
stringent upper limit on any electromagnetic signal in a very broad energy
range, from 3 keV to 8 MeV, constraining the soft gamma-ray afterglow flux to
$<7.1\times$10$^{-11}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (80--300 keV). Exploiting the
unique capabilities of INTEGRAL, we constrained the gamma-ray line emission
from radioactive decays that are expected to be the principal source of the
energy behind a kilonova event following a BNS coalescence. Finally, we put a
stringent upper limit on any delayed bursting activity, for example from a
newly formed magnetar.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05446 [pdf] - 1589764
An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications:
Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A
Goldstein, A.;
Veres, P.;
Burns, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Preece, R. D.;
Poolakkil, S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Hui, C. M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Christensen, N.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Siellez, K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Broida, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
McEnery, J.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Stanbro, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately
1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated
with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of
gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from a single astrophysical
source and marks the start of gravitational-wave multi-messenger astronomy. We
report the GBM observations and analysis of this ordinary short GRB, which
extraordinarily confirms that at least some short GRBs are produced by binary
compact mergers.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.03719 [pdf] - 1585846
INTEGRAL observations of GW170104
Savchenko, V.;
Ferrigno, C.;
Bozzo, E.;
Bazzano, A.;
Brandt, S.;
Chenevez, J.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.;
Diehl, R.;
Hanlon, L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kuulkers, E.;
Laurent, P.;
Lebrun, F.;
Lutovinov, A.;
Martin-Carillo, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Roques, J. P.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Ubertini, P.
Submitted: 2017-07-12, last modified: 2017-08-18
We used data from the INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory
(INTEGRAL) to set upper-limits on the ${\gamma}$-ray and hard X-ray prompt
emission associated with the gravitational wave event GW170104, discovered by
the LIGO/Virgo collaboration. The unique omni-directional viewing capability of
the instruments on-board INTEGRAL allowed us to examine the full 90% confidence
level localization region of the LIGO trigger. Depending on the particular
spectral model assumed and the specific position within this region, the upper
limits inferred from the INTEGRAL observations range from F${\gamma}$=1.9x10-7
erg cm-2 to F${\gamma}$=10-6 erg cm-2 (75 keV - 2 MeV energy range). This
translates into a ratio between the prompt energy released in ${\gamma}$-rays
along the direction to the observer and the gravitational wave energy of
E${\gamma}$/EGW <2.6x10-5 . Using the INTEGRAL results, we can not confirm the
${\gamma}$-ray proposed counterpart to GW170104 by the AGILE team with the MCAL
instrument. The reported flux of the AGILE/MCAL event, E2, is not compatible
with the INTEGRAL upper limits within most of the 90% LIGO localization region.
There is only a relatively limited portion of the sky where the sensitivity of
the INTEGRAL instruments was not optimal and the lowest allowed fluence
estimated for E2 would still be compatible with the INTEGRAL results. This
region was also observed independently by Fermi/GBM and AstroSAT, from which,
as far as we are aware, there are no reports of any significant detection of a
prompt high-energy event.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.07947 [pdf] - 1580686
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts During
the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run and Implications for the Origin of GRB
150906B
LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Virgo Collaboration;
IPN Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Belgin, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
D'alya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devenson, J.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Galiana, A. Fern'andez;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, Whansun;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGrath, C.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tippens, T.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.
Submitted: 2016-11-23, last modified: 2017-06-21
We present the results of the search for gravitational waves (GWs) associated
with $\gamma$-ray bursts detected during the first observing run of the
Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). We find no
evidence of a GW signal for any of the 41 $\gamma$-ray bursts for which LIGO
data are available with sufficient duration. For all $\gamma$-ray bursts, we
place lower bounds on the distance to the source using the optimistic
assumption that GWs with an energy of $10^{-2}M_\odot c^2$ were emitted within
the $16$-$500\,$Hz band, and we find a median 90% confidence limit of 71$\,$Mpc
at 150$\,$Hz. For the subset of 19 short/hard $\gamma$-ray bursts, we place
lower bounds on distance with a median 90% confidence limit of 90$\,$Mpc for
binary neutron star (BNS) coalescences, and 150 and 139$\,$Mpc for neutron
star-black hole coalescences with spins aligned to the orbital angular momentum
and in a generic configuration, respectively. These are the highest distance
limits ever achieved by GW searches. We also discuss in detail the results of
the search for GWs associated with GRB 150906B, an event that was localized by
the InterPlanetary Network near the local galaxy NGC 3313, which is at a
luminosity distance of 54$\,$Mpc ($z=0.0124$). Assuming the $\gamma$-ray
emission is beamed with a jet half-opening angle $\leq 30^{\circ}$, we exclude
a BNS and a neutron star-black hole in NGC 3313 as the progenitor of this event
with confidence $>99$%. Further, we exclude such progenitors up to a distance
of 102$\,$Mpc and 170$\,$Mpc, respectively.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.01633 [pdf] - 1582380
INTEGRAL IBIS, SPI, and JEM-X observations of LVT151012
Savchenko, V.;
Bazzano, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Brandt, S.;
Chenevez, J.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.;
Diehl, R.;
Ferrigno, C.;
Hanlon, L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kuulkers, E.;
Laurent, P.;
Lebrun, F.;
Lutovinov, A.;
Martin-Carrillo, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Natalucci, L.;
Roques, J. P.;
Siegert, T.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Ubertini, P.
Submitted: 2017-04-05
During the first observing run of LIGO, two gravitational wave events and one
lower-significance trigger (LVT151012) were reported by the LIGO/Virgo
collaboration. At the time of LVT151012, the INTErnational Gamma-Ray
Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL) was pointing at a region of the sky
coincident with the high localization probability area of the event and thus
permitted us to search for its electromagnetic counterpart (both prompt and
afterglow emission). The imaging instruments on-board INTEGRAL (IBIS/ISGRI,
IBIS/PICsIT, SPI, and the two JEM-X modules) have been exploited to attempt the
detection of any electromagnetic emission associated with LVT151012 over 3
decades in energy (from 3 keV to 8 MeV). The omni-directional instruments
on-board the satellite, i.e. the SPI-ACS and IBIS monitored the entire
LVT151012 localization region at energies above 75 keV. We did not find any
significant transient source that was spatially and/or temporally coincident
with LVT151012, obtaining tight upper limits on the associated hard X-ray and
$\gamma$-ray radiation. For typical spectral models, the upper limits on the
fluence of the emission from any 1 s long-lasting counterpart of LVT151012
ranges from $F_{\gamma}=$3.5$\times$10$^{-8}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ (20 - 200 keV) to
$F_{\gamma}$=7.1$\times$10$^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ (75 - 2000 keV), constraining
the ratio of the isotropic equivalent energy released in the electromagnetic
emission to the total energy of the gravitational waves:
$E_{75-2000~keV}/E_{GW}<$4.4$\times$10$^{-5}$. Finally, we provide an
exhaustive summary of the capabilities of all instruments on-board INTEGRAL to
hunt for $\gamma$-ray counterparts of gravitational wave events, exploiting
both serendipitous and pointed follow-up observations. This will serve as a
reference for all future searches.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.03339 [pdf] - 1436485
The Spectral Sharpness Angle of Gamma-ray Bursts
Submitted: 2016-07-12
We explain the results of Yu et al. (2015b) of the novel sharpness angle
measurement to a large number of spectra obtained from the Fermi gamma-ray
burst monitor. The sharpness angle is compared to the values obtained from
various representative emission models: blackbody, single-electron synchrotron,
synchrotron emission from a Maxwellian or power-law electron distribution. It
is found that more than 91% of the high temporally and spectrally resolved
spectra are inconsistent with any kind of optically thin synchrotron emission
model alone. It is also found that the limiting case, a single temperature
Maxwellian synchrotron function, can only contribute up to 58+23 -18% of the
peak flux. These results show that even the sharpest but non-realistic case,
the single-electron synchrotron function, cannot explain a large fraction of
the observed spectra. Since any combination of physically possible synchrotron
spectra added together will always further broaden the spectrum, emission
mechanisms other than optically thin synchrotron radiation are likely required
in a full explanation of the spectral peaks or breaks of the GRB prompt
emission phase.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04901 [pdf] - 1530839
Searching the Gamma-ray Sky for Counterparts to Gravitational Wave
Sources: Fermi GBM and LAT Observations of LVT151012 and GW151226
Racusin, J. L.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Connaughton, V.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Jenke, P.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Broida, J.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Littenberg, T.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Stanbro, M.;
Veres, P.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Ackermann, M.;
Albert, A.;
Atwood, W. B.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Ballet, J.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bloom, E. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buson, S.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caragiulo, M.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Charles, E.;
Chiang, J.;
Ciprini, S.;
Costanza, F.;
Cuoco, A.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Palma, F.;
Desiante, R.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Mauro, M.;
Di Venere, L.;
Drell, P. S.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Ferrara, E. C.;
Focke, W. B.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Gill, R.;
Giroletti, M.;
Glanzman, T.;
Granot, J.;
Green, D.;
Grove, J. E.;
Guillemot, L.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harding, A. K.;
Jogler, T.;
Johannesson, G.;
Kamae, T.;
Kensei, S.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Li, J.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Magill, J. D.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Ormes, J. F.;
Paneque, D.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Piron, F.;
Pivato, G.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Raino, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Scargle, J. D.;
Sgro, C.;
Simone, D.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Smith, D. A.;
Spada, F.;
Spinelli, P.;
Suson, D. J.;
Tajima, H.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
Vianello, G.;
Wood, K. S.;
Wood, M.
Submitted: 2016-06-15
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope
(LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and
candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected
by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT
data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated
pipelines and new techniques for char- acterizing the upper limits across a
large area of the sky. Due to the partial GBM and LAT coverage of the large
LIGO localization regions at the trigger times for both events, dif- ferences
in source distances and masses, as well as the uncertain degree to which
emission from these sources could be beamed, these non-detections cannot be
used to constrain the variety of theoretical models recently applied to explain
the candidate GBM counterpart to GW150914.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.03920 [pdf] - 1439752
Fermi GBM Observations of LIGO Gravitational Wave event GW150914
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Jenke, P.;
Littenberg, T.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Racusin, J.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Giles, M. M.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
Sparke, L.;
Stanbro, M.;
Toelge, K.;
Veres, P.
Submitted: 2016-02-11, last modified: 2016-06-01
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst
Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic
counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of
the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914
reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event,
with a false alarm probability of 0.0022 (2.9$\sigma$). This weak transient
lasting 1 s was not detected by any other instrument and does not appear
connected with other previously known astrophysical, solar, terrestrial, or
magnetospheric activity. Its localization is ill-constrained but consistent
with the direction of GW150914. The duration and spectrum of the transient
event are consistent with a weak short Gamma-Ray Burst arriving at a large
angle to the direction in which Fermi was pointing, where the GBM detector
response is not optimal. If the GBM transient is associated with GW150914, this
electromagnetic signal from a stellar mass black hole binary merger is
unexpected. We calculate a luminosity in hard X-ray emission between 1~keV and
10~MeV of $1.8^{+1.5}_{-1.0} \times 10^{49}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. Future joint
observations of GW events by LIGO/Virgo and Fermi GBM could reveal whether the
weak transient reported here is a plausible counterpart to GW150914 or a chance
coincidence, and will further probe the connection between compact binary
mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01264 [pdf] - 1447654
Investigation of Primordial Black Hole Bursts using Interplanetary
Network Gamma-ray Bursts
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Hurley, K.;
MacGibbon, J. H;
Svinkin, D. S;
Aptekar, R. L;
Golenetskii, S. V;
Frederiks, D. D;
Pal'shin, V. D;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Kozyrev, A. S;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohmori, N.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A;
McTiernan, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-03, last modified: 2016-04-27
The detection of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) in the solar neighborhood would have
very important implications for GRB phenomenology. The leading theories for
cosmological GRBs would not be able to explain such events. The final bursts of
evaporating Primordial Black Holes (PBHs), however, would be a natural
explanation for local GRBs. We present a novel technique that can constrain the
distance to gamma-ray bursts using detections from widely separated,
non-imaging spacecraft. This method can determine the actual distance to the
burst if it is local. We applied this method to constrain distances to a sample
of 36 short duration GRBs detected by the Interplanetary Network (IPN) that
show observational properties that are expected from PBH evaporations. These
bursts have minimum possible distances in the 10^13-10^18 cm (7-10^5 AU) range,
consistent with the expected PBH energetics and with a possible origin in the
solar neighborhood, although none of the bursts can be unambiguously
demonstrated to be local. Assuming these bursts are real PBH events, we
estimate lower limits on the PBH burst evaporation rate in the solar
neighborhood.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.07612 [pdf] - 1400531
The 3rd Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Six Years
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Meegan, Charles A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Paciesas, William S.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Burns, Eric;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Cleveland, William H.;
Collazzi, Andrew C.;
Connaughto, Valerie;
Diekmann, Anne M.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Gibby, Melissa H.;
Giles, Misty M.;
Goldstein, Adam M.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Jenke, Peter A.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
McBreen, Sheila;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Sparke, Linda S.;
Stanbro, Matthew;
Veres, Peter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Younes, George;
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Zhang, Binbin
Submitted: 2016-03-24
Since its launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has
triggered and located on average approximately two gamma-ray bursts (GRB) every
three days. Here we present the third of a series of catalogs of GRBs detected
by GBM, extending the second catalog by two more years, through the middle of
July 2014. The resulting list includes 1405 triggers identified as GRBs. The
intention of the GBM GRB catalog is to provide information to the community on
the most important observables of the GBM detected GRBs. For each GRB the
location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak
flux and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the
50-300~keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the
instrument reference system is observed, and also for a broader energy band
from 10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy NaI(Tl)
detectors. Using statistical methods to assess clustering, we find that the
hardness and duration of GRBs are better fitted by a two-component model with
short-hard and long-soft bursts, than by a model with three components.
Furthermore, information is provided on the settings and modifications of the
triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions during years five
and six in the mission. This third catalog is an official product of the Fermi
GBM science team, and the data files containing the complete results are
available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center
(HEASARC).
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04180 [pdf] - 1388932
INTEGRAL upper limits on gamma-ray emission associated with the
gravitational wave event GW150914
Savchenko, V.;
Ferrigno, C.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Natalucci, L.;
Bazzano, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Brandt, S.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.;
Diehl, R.;
Hanlon, L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kuulkers, E.;
Laurent, P.;
Lebrun, F.;
Roques, J. P.;
Ubertini, P.;
Weidenspointner, G.
Submitted: 2016-02-12, last modified: 2016-03-07
Using observations of the INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory
(INTEGRAL), we put upper limits on the gamma-ray and hard X-ray prompt emission
associated with the gravitational wave event GW150914, discovered by the
LIGO/Virgo collaboration. The omni-directional view of the INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS has
allowed us to constrain the fraction of energy emitted in the hard X-ray
electromagnetic component for the full high-probability sky region of LIGO
trigger. Our upper limits on the hard X-ray fluence at the time of the event
range from $F_{\gamma}=2 \times 10^{-8}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ to $F_{\gamma}=10^{-6}$
erg cm$^{-2}$ in the 75 keV - 2 MeV energy range for typical spectral models.
Our results constrain the ratio of the energy promptly released in gamma-rays
in the direction of the observer to the gravitational wave energy
E$_\gamma/$E$_\mathrm{GW}<10^{-6}$. We discuss the implication of gamma-ray
limits on the characteristics of the gravitational wave source, based on the
available predictions for prompt electromagnetic emission.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.05206 [pdf] - 1385453
The Fermi GBM gamma-ray burst time-resolved spectral catalog: brightest
bursts in the first four years
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Preece, Robert D.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Cleveland, William H.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Goldstein, Adam;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Rau, Arne;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Veres, Péter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen;
Zhang, Bin-Bin;
van Eerten, Hendrik J.
Submitted: 2016-01-20
We aim to obtain high-quality time-resolved spectral fits of gamma-ray bursts
(GRBs) observed by the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope. We perform time-resolved spectral analysis with high
temporal and spectral resolution of the brightest bursts observed by Fermi GBM
in its first 4 years of mission. We present the complete catalog containing
1,491 spectra from 81 bursts with high spectral and temporal resolution.
Distributions of parameters, statistics of the parameter populations,
parameter-parameter and parameter-uncertainty correlations, and their exact
values are obtained and presented as main results in this catalog. We report a
criterion that is robust enough to automatically distinguish between different
spectral evolutionary trends between bursts. We also search for plausible
blackbody emission components and find that only 3 bursts (36 spectra in total)
show evidence of a pure Planck function. It is observed that the averaged
time-resolved low-energy power-law index and peak energy are slightly harder
than the time-integrated values. Time-resolved spectroscopic results should be
used when interpreting physics from the observed spectra, instead of the
time-integrated results.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05589 [pdf] - 1304031
The sharpness of gamma-ray burst prompt emission spectra
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2015-10-02
We aim to obtain a measure of the curvature of time-resolved spectra that can
be compared directly to theory. This tests the ability of models such as
synchrotron emission to explain the peaks or breaks of GBM prompt emission
spectra. We take the burst sample from the official Fermi GBM GRB time-resolved
spectral catalog. We re-fit all spectra with a measured peak or break energy in
the catalog best-fit models in various energy ranges, which cover the curvature
around the spectral peak or break, resulting in a total of 1,113 spectra being
analysed. We compute the sharpness angles under the peak or break of the
triangle constructed under the model fit curves and compare to the values
obtained from various representative emission models: blackbody,
single-electron synchrotron, synchrotron emission from a Maxwellian or
power-law electron distribution. We find that 35% of the time-resolved spectra
are inconsistent with the single-electron synchrotron function, and 91% are
inconsistent with the Maxwellian synchrotron function. The single temperature,
single emission time and location blackbody function is found to be sharper
than all the spectra. No general evolutionary trend of the sharpness angle is
observed, neither per burst nor for the whole population. It is found that the
limiting case, a single temperature Maxwellian synchrotron function, can only
contribute up to $58^{+23}_{-18}$% of the peak flux. Our results show that even
the sharpest but non-realistic case, the single-electron synchrotron function,
cannot explain a large fraction of the observed GRB prompt spectra. Because of
the fact that any combination of physically possible synchrotron spectra added
together will always further broaden the spectrum, emission mechanisms other
than optically thin synchrotron radiation are likely required in a full
explanation of the spectral peaks or breaks of the GRB prompt emission phase.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.03478 [pdf] - 1247575
Gamma-Ray Burst observations with Fermi
Submitted: 2015-07-13
After seven years of science operation, the Fermi mission has brought great
advances in the study of Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs). Over 1600 GRBs have been
detected by the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor, and more than 100 of these are also
detected by the Large Area Telescope above 30 MeV. We will give an overview of
these observations, presenting the common properties in the GRB temporal and
spectral behavior at high energies. We will also highlight the unique
characteristics of some individual bursts. The main physical implications of
these results will be discussed, along with open questions regarding GRB
modeling in their prompt and temporally-extended emission phases.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.02961 [pdf] - 1005759
Compton scattering in terrestrial gamma-ray flashes detected with the
Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Cramer, Eric;
McBreen, Sheila;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Foley, Suzanne;
Tierney, David;
Chaplin, Vandiver L.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Stanbro, Matthew;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Dwyer, Joseph;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2015-05-12
Terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) are short intense flashes of gamma rays
associated with lightning activity in thunderstorms. Using Monte Carlo
simulations of the relativistic runaway electron avalanche (RREA) process,
theoretical predictions for the temporal and spectral evolution of TGFs are
compared to observations made with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board
the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. Assuming a single source altitude of 15
km, a comparison of simulations to data is performed for a range of empirically
chosen source electron variation time scales. The data exhibit a clear
softening with increased source distance, in qualitative agreement with
theoretical predictions. The simulated spectra follow this trend in the data,
but tend to underestimate the observed hardness. Such a discrepancy may imply
that the basic RREA model is not sufficient. Alternatively, a TGF beam that is
tilted with respect to the zenith could produce an evolution with source
distance that is compatible with the data. Based on these results, we propose
that the source electron distributions of TGFs observed by GBM vary on time
scales of at least tens of microseconds, with an upper limit of approx. 100
microseconds.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.02971 [pdf] - 1005761
Pulse properties of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes detected by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Foley, Suzanne;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Tierney, David;
McBreen, Sheila;
Dwyer, Joseph;
Chaplin, Vandiver L.;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Byrne, David;
Cramer, Eric;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Greiner, Jochen;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2015-05-12
The Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board the Fermi Gamma-ray Space
Telescope has triggered on over 300 terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) since
its launch in June 2008. With 14 detectors, GBM collects on average ~100 counts
per triggered TGF, enabling unprecedented studies of the time profiles of TGFs.
Here we present the first rigorous analysis of the temporal properties of a
large sample of TGFs (278), including the distributions of the rise and fall
times of the individual pulses and their durations. A variety of time profiles
are observed with 19 of TGFs having multiple pulses separated in time and 31
clear cases of partially overlapping pulses. The effect of instrumental dead
time and pulse pileup on the temporal properties are also presented. As the
observed gamma ray pulse structure is representative of the electron flux at
the source, TGF pulse parameters are critical to distinguish between
relativistic feedback discharge and lightning leader models. We show that at
least 67% of TGFs at satellite altitudes are significantly asymmetric. For the
asymmetric pulses, the rise times are almost always shorter than the fall
times. Those which are not are consistent with statistical fluctuations. The
median rise time for asymmetric pulses is ~3 times shorter than for symmetric
pulses while their fall times are comparable. The asymmetric shapes observed
are consistent with the relativistic feedback discharge model when Compton
scattering of photons between the source and Fermi is included, and
instrumental effects are taken into account.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.04152 [pdf] - 1055850
The Five Year Fermi/GBM Magnetar Burst Catalog
Collazzi, A. C.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Younes, G. A.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Gogus, E.;
Lin, L.;
Granot, J.;
Finger, M. H.;
Chaplin, V. L.;
Huppenkothen, D.;
Watts, A. L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Baring, M. G.;
Gruber, D.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Gehrels, N.;
McEnery, J.;
van der Klis, M.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.
Submitted: 2015-03-13, last modified: 2015-04-13
Since launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected
many hundreds of bursts from magnetar sources. While the vast majority of these
bursts have been attributed to several known magnetars, there is also a small
sample of magnetar-like bursts of unknown origin. Here we present the Fermi/GBM
magnetar catalog, giving the results of the temporal and spectral analyses of
440 magnetar bursts with high temporal and spectral resolution. This catalog
covers the first five years of GBM magnetar observations, from July 2008 to
June 2013. We provide durations, spectral parameters for various models,
fluences and peak fluxes for all the bursts, as well as a detailed temporal
analysis for SGR J1550-5418 bursts. Finally, we suggest that some of the bursts
of unknown origin are associated with the newly discovered magnetar 3XMM
J185246.6+0033.7.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.2685 [pdf] - 1223104
Localization of Gamma-Ray Bursts using the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Connaughton, V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Goldstein, A.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Greiner, J.;
Gruber, D.;
Jenke, P.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Pelassa, V.;
Xiong, S.;
Yu, H. -F.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Burgess, J. M.;
Byrne, D.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Foley, S.;
Giles, M. M.;
Guiriec, S.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
McGlynn, S.;
Tierney, D.;
Zhang, B. -B.
Submitted: 2014-11-10
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected over 1400 Gamma-Ray
Bursts (GRBs) since it began science operations in July, 2008. We use a subset
of over 300 GRBs localized by instruments such as Swift, the Fermi Large Area
Telescope, INTEGRAL, and MAXI, or through triangulations from the
InterPlanetary Network (IPN), to analyze the accuracy of GBM GRB localizations.
We find that the reported statistical uncertainties on GBM localizations, which
can be as small as 1 degree, underestimate the distance of the GBM positions to
the true GRB locations and we attribute this to systematic uncertainties. The
distribution of systematic uncertainties is well represented (68% confidence
level) by a 3.7 degree Gaussian with a non-Gaussian tail that contains about
10% of GBM-detected GRBs and extends to approximately 14 degrees. A more
complex model suggests that there is a dependence of the systematic uncertainty
on the position of the GRB in spacecraft coordinates, with GRBs in the
quadrants on the Y-axis better localized than those on the X-axis.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.7602 [pdf] - 1286908
Synchrotron Cooling in Energetic Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Greiner, Jochen;
van Eerten, Hendrik;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Goldstein, Adam;
Gruber, David;
Jenke, Peter A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Zhang, Bin-Bin
Submitted: 2014-10-28
We study the time-resolved spectra of eight GRBs observed by Fermi GBM in its
first five years of mission, with 1 keV - 1 MeV fluence $f>1.0\times10^{-4}$
erg cm$^{-2}$ and signal-to-noise level $\text{S/N}\geq10.0$ above 900 keV. We
aim to constrain in detail the spectral properties of GRB prompt emission on a
time-resolved basis and to discuss the theoretical implications of the fitting
results in the context of various prompt emission models. We perform
time-resolved spectral analysis using a variable temporal binning technique
according to optimal S/N criteria, resulting in a total of 299 time-resolved
spectra. We fit the Band function to all spectra and obtain the distributions
for the low-energy power-law index $\alpha$, the high-energy power-law index
$\beta$, the peak energy in the observed $\nu F_\nu$ spectrum $E_\text{p}$, and
the difference between the low- and high-energy power-law indices $\Delta
s=\alpha-\beta$. Using the distributions of $\Delta s$ and $\beta$, the
electron population index $p$ is found to be consistent with the "moderately
fast" scenario which fast- and slow-cooling scenarios cannot be distinguished.
We also apply a physically motivated synchrotron model, which is a triple
power-law with constrained power-law indices and a blackbody component, to test
for consistency with a synchrotron origin for the prompt emission and obtain
the distributions for the two break energies $E_\text{b,1}$ and $E_\text{b,2}$,
the middle segment power-law index $\beta$, and the Planck function temperature
$kT$. A synchrotron model is found consistent with the majority of
time-resolved spectra for these eight energetic Fermi GBM bursts with good
high-energy photon statistics, as long as both the cooling and injection break
are included and the leftmost spectral slope is lifted either by inclusion of a
thermal component or when an evolving magnetic field is accounted for.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4210 [pdf] - 863113
GROND coverage of the main peak of Gamma-Ray Burst 130925A
Greiner, J.;
Yu, H. -F.;
Krühler, T.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Beloborodov, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bolmer, J.;
van Eerten, H.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Elliott, J.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Graham, J. F.;
Hurley, K.;
Kann, D. A.;
Klose, S.;
Guelbenzu, A. Nicuesa;
Rau, A.;
Schady, P.;
Schmidl, S.;
Sudilovsky, V.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Tanga, M.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Varela, K.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X. -L.
Submitted: 2014-07-16
Prompt or early optical emission in gamma-ray bursts is notoriously difficult
to measure, and observations of the dozen cases show a large variety of
properties. Yet, such early emission promises to help us achieve a better
understanding of the GRB emission process(es).
We performed dedicated observations of the ultra-long duration (T90 about
7000 s) GRB 130925A in the optical/near-infrared with the 7-channel "Gamma-Ray
Burst Optical and Near-infrared Detector" (GROND) at the 2.2m MPG/ESO
telescope. We detect an optical/NIR flare with an amplitude of nearly 2 mag
which is delayed with respect to the keV--MeV prompt emission by about 300--400
s. The decay time of this flare is shorter than the duration of the flare (500
s) or its delay.
While we cannot offer a straightforward explanation, we discuss the
implications of the flare properties and suggest ways toward understanding it.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.6639 [pdf] - 848128
Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts detected
by the InterPlanetary Network
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Alemic, A.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Amariutei, D.;
Andersen, M.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Augustus, H.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barbet, M.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belczynski, C.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, Sukanta;
Bosi, L.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Buchman, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burman, R.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castaldi, G.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Celerier, C.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C.;
Colombini, M.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Croce, R. P.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, C.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dickson, J.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Dominguez, E.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edo, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Gräf, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C. J.;
Gushwa, K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, J.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, W.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hart, M.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horrom, T.;
Hoske, D.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Huerta, E.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
Jang, H.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Ji, Y.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karlen, J.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keiser, G. M.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N. G.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nanda;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, P. J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. Le;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libbrecht, K.;
Libson, A.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lopez, E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Ma, Y.;
Macdonald, E. P.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Maglione, C.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mangini, N. M.;
Mansell, G.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martinelli, L.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McLin, K.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meinders, M.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A. H.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Omar, S.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, R.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ortega, W.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, H.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poteomkin, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Ramirez, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Recchia, S.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Reula, O.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S. B.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sankar, S.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schilling, R.;
Schilman, M.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Singh, R.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Staley, A.;
Stebbins, J.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tao, J.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Tellez, G.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Tshilumba, D.;
Tuennermann, H.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Heijningen, J.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, K.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wolovick, N.;
Worden, J.;
Wu, Y.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, Fan;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Atteia, J. L.;
Cline, T.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Palmer, D.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Terada, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2014-03-26, last modified: 2014-04-17
We present the results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
223 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the InterPlanetary Network (IPN) in
2005-2010 during LIGO's fifth and sixth science runs and Virgo's first, second
and third science runs. The IPN satellites provide accurate times of the bursts
and sky localizations that vary significantly from degree scale to hundreds of
square degrees. We search for both a well-modeled binary coalescence signal,
the favored progenitor model for short GRBs, and for generic, unmodeled
gravitational wave bursts. Both searches use the event time and sky
localization to improve the gravitational-wave search sensitivity as compared
to corresponding all-time, all-sky searches. We find no evidence of a
gravitational-wave signal associated with any of the IPN GRBs in the sample,
nor do we find evidence for a population of weak gravitational-wave signals
associated with the GRBs. For all IPN-detected GRBs, for which a sufficient
duration of quality gravitational-wave data is available, we place lower bounds
on the distance to the source in accordance with an optimistic assumption of
gravitational-wave emission energy of $10^{-2}M_{\odot}c^2$ at 150 Hz, and find
a median of 13 Mpc. For the 27 short-hard GRBs we place 90% confidence
exclusion distances to two source models: a binary neutron star coalescence,
with a median distance of 12Mpc, or the coalescence of a neutron star and black
hole, with a median distance of 22 Mpc. Finally, we combine this search with
previously published results to provide a population statement for GRB searches
in first-generation LIGO and Virgo gravitational-wave detectors, and a
resulting examination of prospects for the advanced gravitational-wave
detectors.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.2756 [pdf] - 1208919
Quasi-Periodic Oscillations in Short Recurring Bursts of the Soft-Gamma
Repeater J1550-5418
Huppenkothen, Daniela;
D'Angelo, Caroline;
Watts, Anna L.;
Heil, Lucy;
van der Klis, Michiel;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Baring, Matthew G.;
Gogus, Ersin;
Granot, Jonathan;
Kaneko, Yuki;
Lin, Lin;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Younes, George
Submitted: 2014-04-10
The discovery of quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) in magnetar giant flares
has opened up prospects for neutron star asteroseismology. The scarcity of
giant flares makes a search for QPOs in the shorter, far more numerous bursts
from Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs) desirable. In Huppenkothen et al (2013), we
developed a Bayesian method for searching for QPOs in short magnetar bursts,
taking into account the effects of the complicated burst structure, and have
shown its feasibility on a small sample of bursts. Here, we apply the same
method to a much larger sample from a burst storm of 286 bursts from SGR
J1550-5418. We report a candidate signal at 260 Hz in a search of the
individual bursts, which is fairly broad. We also find two QPOs at 93 Hz and
one at 127 Hz, when averaging periodograms from a number of bursts in
individual triggers, at frequencies close to QPOs previously observed in
magnetar giant flares. Finally, for the first time, we explore the overall
burst variability in the sample, and report a weak anti-correlation between the
power-law index of the broadband model characterising aperiodic burst
variability, and the burst duration: shorter bursts have steeper power law
indices than longer bursts. This indicates that longer bursts vary over a
broader range of time scales, and are not simply longer versions of the short
bursts.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6015 [pdf] - 1203538
Time resolved spectroscopy of SGR J1550-5418 bursts detected with
Fermi/GBM
Younes, G.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Baring, M. G.;
Granot, J.;
Watts, A. L.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Collazzi, A.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gorgone, N.;
Gogus, E.;
Gruber, D.;
Grunblatt, S.;
Huppenkothen, D.;
Kaneko, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.;
van der Klis, M.;
Lin, L.;
Mcenery, J.;
van Putten, T.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.
Submitted: 2014-02-24
We report on time-resolved spectroscopy of the 63 brightest bursts of SGR
J1550-5418, detected with Fermi/Gamma-ray Burst Monitor during its 2008-2009
intense bursting episode. We performed spectral analysis down to 4 ms
time-scales, to characterize the spectral evolution of the bursts. Using a
Comptonized model, we find that the peak energy, E_peak, anti-correlates with
flux, while the low-energy photon index remains constant at -0.8 up to a flux
limit F~10^-5 erg s-1 cm-2. Above this flux value the E_peak-flux correlation
changes sign, and the index positively correlates with flux reaching 1 at the
highest fluxes. Using a two black-body model, we find that the areas and fluxes
of the two emitting regions correlate positively. Further, we study here for
the first time, the evolution of the temperatures and areas as a function of
flux. We find that the area-kT relation follows lines of constant luminosity at
the lowest fluxes, R^2 \propto kT^-4, with a break at higher fluxes ($F>10^-5.5
erg s-1 cm-2). The area of the high-kT component increases with flux while its
temperature decreases, which we interpret as due to an adiabatic cooling
process. The area of the low-kT component, on the other hand, appears to
saturate at the highest fluxes, towards R_max~30 km. Assuming that crust quakes
are responsible for SGR bursts and considering R_max as the maximum radius of
the emitting photon-pair plasma fireball, we relate this saturation radius to a
minimum excitation radius of the magnetosphere, and put a lower limit on the
internal magnetic field of SGR J1550-5418, B_int>~4.5x10^15 G.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.5080 [pdf] - 789271
The 2nd Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Four Years
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Byrne, David;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Cleveland, William;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Collazzi, Andrew C.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Layden, Emily;
McBreen, Sheila;
McGlynn, Sinead;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Younes, George;
Yu, Hoi-Fung
Submitted: 2014-01-20, last modified: 2014-01-24
This is the second of a series of catalogs of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
observed with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM). It extends the first
two-year catalog by two more years, resulting in an overall list of 953 GBM
triggered GRBs. The intention of the GBM GRB catalog is to provide information
to the community on the most important observables of the GBM detected GRBs.
For each GRB the location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the
duration, peak flux and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are
calculated for the 50 - 300 keV energy band, where the maximum energy release
of GRBs in the instrument reference system is observed and also for a broader
energy band from 10 - 1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBMs
low-energy detectors. Furthermore, information is given on the settings and
modifications of the triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions
during years three and four in the mission. This second catalog is an official
product of the Fermi GBM science team, and the data files containing the
complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science
Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.5069 [pdf] - 791904
The Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Catalog: Four Years Of Data
Gruber, David;
Goldstein, Adam;
von Ahlefeld, Victoria Weller;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Byrne, Dave;
Cleveland, William H.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty M.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Layden, Emily;
Lin, Lin;
Meegan, Charles A.;
McGlynn, Sinéad;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pelassa, Véronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Younes, George;
Yu, Hoi-Fung
Submitted: 2014-01-20, last modified: 2014-01-22
In this catalog we present the updated set of spectral analyses of GRBs
detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) during its first four years
of operation. It contains two types of spectra, time-integrated spectral fits
and spectral fits at the brightest time bin, from 943 triggered GRBs. Four
different spectral models were fitted to the data, resulting in a compendium of
more than 7500 spectra. The analysis was performed similarly, but not
identically to Goldstein et al. 2012. All 487 GRBs from the first two years
have been re-fitted using the same methodology as that of the 456 GRBs in years
three and four. We describe, in detail, our procedure and criteria for the
analysis, and present the results in the form of parameter distributions both
for the observer-frame and rest-frame quantities. The data files containing the
complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science
Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5734 [pdf] - 755152
The ultraluminous GRB 110918A
Frederiks, D. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Mangano, V.;
Oates, S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Kokomov, A. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
Starr, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Goldstein, J.
Submitted: 2013-11-22
GRB 110918A is the brightest long GRB detected by Konus-WIND during its 19
years of continuous observations and the most luminous GRB ever observed since
the beginning of the cosmological era in 1997. We report on the final IPN
localization of this event and its detailed multiwavelength study with a number
of space-based instruments. The prompt emission is characterized by a typical
duration, a moderare $E_{peak}$ of the time-integrated spectrum, and strong
hard-to-soft evolution. The high observed energy fluence yields, at z=0.984, a
huge isotropic-equivalent energy release $E_{iso}=(2.1\pm0.1)\times10^{54}$
erg. The record-breaking energy flux observed at the peak of the short, bright,
hard initial pulse results in an unprecedented isotropic-equivalent luminosity
$L_{iso}=(4.7\pm0.2)\times10^{54}$erg s$^{-1}$. A tail of the soft gamma-ray
emission was detected with temporal and spectral behavior typical of that
predicted by the synchrotron forward-shock model. Swift/XRT and Swift/UVOT
observed the bright afterglow from 1.2 to 48 days after the burst and revealed
no evidence of a jet break. The post-break scenario for the afterglow is
preferred from our analysis, with a hard underlying electron spectrum and
ISM-like circumburst environment implied. We conclude that, among multiple
reasons investigated, the tight collimation of the jet must have been a key
ingredient to produce this unusually bright burst. The inferred jet opening
angle of 1.7-3.4 deg results in reasonable values of the collimation-corrected
radiated energy and the peak luminosity, which, however, are still at the top
of their distributions for such tightly collimated events. We estimate a
detection horizon for a similar ultraluminous GRB of $z\sim7.5$ for Konus-WIND,
and $z\sim12$ for Swift/BAT, which stresses the importance of GRBs as probes of
the early Universe.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5581 [pdf] - 750298
The First Pulse of the Extremely Bright GRB 130427A: A Test Lab for
Synchrotron Shocks
Preece, R.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
von Kienlin, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Byrne, D.;
Chaplin, V.;
Cleveland, W.;
Collazzi, A. C.;
Connaughton, V.;
Diekmann, A.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Foley, S.;
Gibby, M.;
Giles, M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Greiner, J.;
Gruber, D.;
Jenke, P.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
McBreen, S.;
Meegan, C.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Pelassa, V.;
Tierney, D.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.;
Xiong, S.;
Younes, G.;
Yu, H. -F.;
Ackermann, M.;
Ajello, M.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Bonamente, E.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brigida, M.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Buson, S.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cecchi, C.;
Charles, E.;
Chekhtman, A.;
Chiang, J.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Claus, R.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Conrad, J.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Angelis, A.;
de Palma, F.;
Dermer, C. D.;
Desiante, R.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Venere, L.;
Drell, P. S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Germani, S.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Godfrey, G.;
Granot, J.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Guiriec, S.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Harding, A. K.;
Hayashida, M.;
Iyyani, S.;
Jogler, T.;
Jóannesson, G.;
Kawano, T.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kuss, M.;
Lande, J.;
Larsson, J.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lovellette, M. N.;
Lubrano, P.;
Mayer, M.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Moretti, E.;
Morselli, A.;
Murgia, S.;
Nemmen, R.;
Nuss, E.;
Nymark, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohsugi, T.;
Okumura, A.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Piron, F.;
Pivato, G.;
Porter, T. A.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Rainò, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Ritz, S.;
Roth, M.;
Ryde, F.;
Sartori, A.;
Scargle, J. D.;
Schulz, A.;
Sgrò, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Suson, D. J.;
Tajima, H.;
Takahashi, H.;
Thayer, J. G.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Tibaldo, L.;
Tinivella, M.;
Torres, D. F.;
Tosti, G.;
Troja, E.;
Usher, T. L.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Vasileiou, V.;
Vianello, G.;
Vitale, V.;
Werner, M.;
Winer, B. L.;
Wood, K. S.;
Zhu, S.
Submitted: 2013-11-21
Gamma-ray burst (GRB) 130427A is one of the most energetic GRBs ever
observed. The initial pulse up to 2.5 s is possibly the brightest well-isolated
pulse observed to date. A fine time resolution spectral analysis shows
power-law decays of the peak energy from the onset of the pulse, consistent
with models of internal synchrotron shock pulses. However, a strongly
correlated power-law behavior is observed between the luminosity and the
spectral peak energy that is inconsistent with curvature effects arising in the
relativistic outflow. It is difficult for any of the existing models to account
for all of the observed spectral and temporal behaviors simultaneously.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.6785 [pdf] - 713385
The Hot and Energetic Universe: The Wide Field Imager (WFI) for Athena+
Rau, A.;
Meidinger, N.;
Nandra, K.;
Porro, M.;
Barret, D.;
Santangelo, A.;
Schmid, C.;
Struder, L.;
Tenzer, C.;
Wilms, J.;
Amoros, C.;
Andritschke, R.;
Aschauer, F.;
Bahr, A.;
Gunther, B.;
Furmetz, M.;
Ott, B.;
Perinati, E.;
Rambaud, D.;
Reiffers, J.;
Treis, J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Weidenspointner, G.
Submitted: 2013-08-30
The Wide Field Imager (WFI) is one of the two scientific instruments proposed
for the Athena+ X-ray observatory. It will provide imaging in the 0.1-15 keV
band over a wide field, simultaneously with spectrally and time-resolved photon
counting. The instrument is designed to make optimal use of the grasp
(collecting area times solid angle product) provided by the optical design of
the Athena+ mirror system (Willingale et al. 2013), by combining a sensitive
approx. 40' diameter field of view (baseline; 50' goal) DEPFET detector with a
pixel size properly sampling the angular resolution of 5 arc sec on-axis (half
energy width).This synthesis makes the WFI a very powerful survey instrument,
significantly surpassing currently existing capabilities (Nandra et al. 2013;
Aird et al. 2013). In addition, the WFI will provide unprecedented simultaneous
high-time resolution and high count rate capabilities for the observation of
bright sources with low pile-up and high efficiency. In this paper, we
summarize the instrument design, the status of the technology development, and
the baseline performance.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.1825 [pdf] - 648928
Three years of Fermi GBM Earth Occultation Monitoring: Observations of
Hard X-ray/Soft Gamma-Ray Sources
Jenke, P.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Case, Gary L.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Rodi, James;
Camero-Arranz, Ascension;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Beklen, Elif;
Finger, Mark H.;
Bhat, Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughto, Valerie;
Greiner, Jochen;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2013-04-05
The Gamma ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope
has been providing continuous data to the astronomical community since 2008
August 12. We will present the results of the analysis of the first three years
of these continuous data using the Earth occultation technique to monitor a
catalog of 209 sources. Although the occultation technique is in principle
quite simple, in practice there are many complications including the dynamic
instrument response, source confusion, and scattering in the Earth's
atmosphere, which will be described. We detect 99 sources, including 40
low-mass X-ray binary/neutron star systems, 31 high-mass X-ray binary/neutron
star systems, 12 black hole binaries, 12 active galaxies, 2 other sources, plus
the Crab Nebula and the Sun. Nine of these sources are detected in the 100-300
keV band, including seven black-hole binaries, the active galaxy Cen A, and the
Crab. The Crab and Cyg X-1 are also detected in the 300-500 keV band. GBM
provides complementary data to other sky monitors below 100 keV and is the only
all-sky monitor above 100 keV. In our fourth year of monitoring, we have
already increased the number of transient sources detected and expect several
of the weaker persistent sources to cross the detection threshold. I will
briefly discuss these new sources and what to expect from our five year
occultation catalog.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.5203 [pdf] - 617260
GRB 080407: an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN
Pal'shin, V.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Boynton, W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Rau, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Zhang, X.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Del Monte, E.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-22
We present observations of the extremely long GRB 080704 obtained with the
instruments of the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The observations reveal two
distinct emission episodes, separated by a ~1500 s long period of quiescence.
The total burst duration is about 2100 s. We compare the temporal and spectral
characteristics of this burst with those obtained for other ultra-long GRBs and
discuss these characteristics in the context of different models.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4859 [pdf] - 1159175
Anomalies in low-energy Gamma-Ray Burst spectra with the Fermi Gamma-Ray
Burst Monitor
Tierney, Dave;
McBreen, Sheila;
Preece, Robert D.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McGlynn, Sinead;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pelassa, Veronique;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2013-01-21
A Band function has become the standard spectral function used to describe
the prompt emission spectra of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). However, deviations
from this function have previously been observed in GRBs detected by BATSE and
in individual GRBs from the \textit{Fermi} era. We present a systematic and
rigorous search for spectral deviations from a Band function at low energies in
a sample of the first two years of high fluence, long bursts detected by the
\textit{Fermi} Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). The sample contains 45 bursts
with a fluence greater than 2$\times10^{-5}$ erg / cm$^{2}$ (10 - 1000 keV). An
extrapolated fit method is used to search for low-energy spectral anomalies,
whereby a Band function is fit above a variable low-energy threshold and then
the best fit function is extrapolated to lower energy data. Deviations are
quantified by examining residuals derived from the extrapolated function and
the data and their significance is determined via comprehensive simulations
which account for the instrument response. This method was employed for both
time-integrated burst spectra and time-resolved bins defined by a signal to
noise ratio of 25 $\sigma$ and 50 $\sigma$. Significant deviations are evident
in 3 bursts (GRB\,081215A, GRB\,090424 and GRB\,090902B) in the time-integrated
sample ($\sim$ 7%) and 5 bursts (GRB\,090323, GRB\,090424, GRB\,090820,
GRB\,090902B and GRB\,090926A) in the time-resolved sample ($\sim$ 11%).} The
advantage of the systematic, blind search analysis is that it can demonstrate
the requirement for an additional spectral component without any prior
knowledge of the nature of that extra component. Deviations are found in a
large fraction of high fluence GRBs; fainter GRBs may not have sufficient
statistics for deviations to be found using this method.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.6053 [pdf] - 1151675
The Fermi-GBM X-ray burst monitor: thermonuclear bursts from 4U 0614+09
Linares, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Jenke, P.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Camero-Arranz, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Chakrabarty, D.;
Beklen, E.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Finger, M.;
Paciesas, W.;
Preece, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2012-09-26
Thermonuclear bursts from slowly accreting neutron stars (NSs) have proven
difficult to detect, yet they are potential probes of the thermal properties of
the neutron star interior. During the first year of a systematic all-sky search
for X-ray bursts using the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) aboard the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope we have detected 15 thermonuclear bursts from the NS
low-mass X-ray binary 4U 0614+09, when it was accreting at nearly 1% of the
Eddington limit. We measured an average burst recurrence time of 12+/-3 d (68%
confidence interval) between March 2010 and March 2011, classified all bursts
as normal duration bursts and placed a lower limit on the recurrence time of
long/intermediate bursts of 62 d (95% confidence level). We discuss how
observations of thermonuclear bursts in the hard X-ray band compare to pointed
soft X-ray observations, and quantify such bandpass effects on measurements of
burst radiated energy and duration. We put our results for 4U 0614+09 in the
context of other bursters and briefly discuss the constraints on ignition
models. Interestingly, we find that the burst energies in 4U 0614+09 are on
average between those of normal duration bursts and those measured in
long/intermediate bursts. Such a continuous distribution in burst energy
provides a new observational link between normal and long/intermediate bursts.
We suggest that the apparent bimodal distribution that defined normal and
long/intermediate duration bursts during the last decade could be due to an
observational bias towards detecting only the longest and most energetic bursts
from slowly accreting NSs.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.2216 [pdf] - 1123285
Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts during
LIGO science run 6 and Virgo science runs 2 and 3
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Virgo Collaboration;
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M.;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Ceron, E. Amador;
Amariutei, D.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Arain, M. A.;
Araya, M. C.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Atkinson, D.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S.;
Barayoga, J. C. B.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Bastarrika, M.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Bebronne, M.;
Beck, D.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Belopolski, I.;
Benacquista, M.;
Berliner, J. M.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beveridge, N.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biswas, R.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bland, B.;
Blom, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bondarescu, R.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burguet--Castell, J.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cannon, K.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chen, W.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Chow, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, C. T. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Conte, A.;
Conte, R.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordier, M.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cruise, A. M.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, R. M.;
Dahl, K.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Dannenberg, R.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
del Prete, M.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Emilio, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edgar, M.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Endröczi, G.;
Engel, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, K.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, Y.;
Farr, B. F.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Flanigan, M.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Forte, L. A.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fujimoto, M. -K.;
Fulda, P. J.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garufi, F.;
Gáspár, M. E.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Geng, R.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Gergely, L. Á.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gil-Casanova, S.;
Gill, C.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goggin, L. M.;
González, G.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Gray, N.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Greverie, C.;
Grosso, R.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gupta, R.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, T.;
Hallam, J. M.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardt, A.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Hayau, J. -F.;
Heefner, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hendry, M. A.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Herrera, V.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Holtrop, M.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
James, E.;
Jang, Y. J.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jesse, E.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kasturi, R.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kelley, D.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Keresztes, Z.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, B. K.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, H.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, Y. M.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kranz, O.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnamurthy, S.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Lawrie, C.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leonor, I.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Liguori, N.;
Lindquist, P. E.;
Liu, Y.;
Liu, Z.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lodhia, D.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marandi, A.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McKechan, D. J. A.;
McWilliams, S.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Melissinos, A. C.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Moe, B.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohanty, S. D.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mori, T.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mosca, S.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow--Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nash, T.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Necula, V.;
Nelson, J.;
Neri, I.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E.;
Nuttall, L.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Page, A.;
Palladino, L.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoletti, R.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parisi, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patel, P.;
Pedraza, M.;
Peiris, P.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Persichetti, G.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pietka, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Pletsch, H. J.;
Plissi, M. V.;
Poggiani, R.;
Pöld, J.;
Postiglione, F.;
Prato, M.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rankins, B.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Re, V.;
Redwine, K.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Robinson, E. L.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rodriguez, C.;
Rodruck, M.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Röver, C.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sainathan, P.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santamaría, L.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Santostasi, G.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Sato, S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R. L.;
Schilling, R.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sibley, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G. R.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Somiya, K.;
Sorazu, B.;
Soto, J.;
Speirits, F. C.;
Sperandio, L.;
Stefszky, M.;
Stein, A. J.;
Stein, L. C.;
Steinert, E.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sung, M.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Taffarello, L.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, J. R.;
Taylor, R.;
ter Braack, A. P. M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Thüring, A.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Torres, C.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Tournefier, E.;
Tucker, E.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tseng, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Putten, S.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vavoulidis, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veltkamp, C.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Villar, A. E.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Wallace, L.;
Wan, Y.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Z.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Willems, P. A.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Willke, B.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wooley, R.;
Worden, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yu, P.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, F.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, W.;
Zhao, C.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Jenke, P. A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X. -L.
Submitted: 2012-05-10, last modified: 2012-09-24
We present the results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
154 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) that were detected by satellite-based gamma-ray
experiments in 2009-2010, during the sixth LIGO science run and the second and
third Virgo science runs. We perform two distinct searches: a modeled search
for coalescences of either two neutron stars or a neutron star and black hole;
and a search for generic, unmodeled gravitational-wave bursts. We find no
evidence for gravitational-wave counterparts, either with any individual GRB in
this sample or with the population as a whole. For all GRBs we place lower
bounds on the distance to the progenitor, under the optimistic assumption of a
gravitational-wave emission energy of 10^-2 M c^2 at 150 Hz, with a median
limit of 17 Mpc. For short hard GRBs we place exclusion distances on binary
neutron star and neutron star-black hole progenitors, using astrophysically
motivated priors on the source parameters, with median values of 16 Mpc and 28
Mpc respectively. These distance limits, while significantly larger than for a
search that is not aided by GRB satellite observations, are not large enough to
expect a coincidence with a GRB. However, projecting these exclusions to the
sensitivities of Advanced LIGO and Virgo, which should begin operation in 2015,
we find that the detection of gravitational waves associated with GRBs will
become quite possible.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.1434 [pdf] - 1124621
Broadband Spectral Investigations of SGR J1550-5418 Bursts
Lin, Lin;
Gogus, Ersin;
Baring, Matthew G.;
Granot, Jonathan;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Kaneko, Yuki;
van der Horst, Alexander;
Gruber, David;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Younes, George;
Watts, Anna L.;
Gehrels, Neil
Submitted: 2012-07-05
We present the results of our broadband spectral analysis of 42 SGR
J1550-5418 bursts simultaneously detected with the Swift/X-ray Telescope (XRT)
and the Fermi/Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), during the 2009 January active
episode of the source. The unique spectral and temporal capabilities of the XRT
Windowed Timing mode have allowed us to extend the GBM spectral coverage for
these events down to the X-ray domain (0.5-10 keV). Our earlier analysis of the
GBM data found that the SGR J1550-5418 burst spectra were described equally
well with a Comptonized model or with two blackbody functions; the two models
were statistically indistinguishable. Our new broadband (0.5 - 200 keV)
spectral fits show that, on average, the burst spectra are better described
with two blackbody functions than with the Comptonized model. Thus, our joint
XRT/GBM analysis clearly shows for the first time that the SGR J1550-5418 burst
spectra might naturally be expected to exhibit a more truly thermalized
character, such as a two-blackbody or even a multi-blackbody signal. Using the
Swift and RXTE timing ephemeris for SGR J1550-5418 we construct the
distribution of the XRT burst counts with spin phase and find that it is not
correlated with the persistent X-ray emission pulse phase from SGR J1550-5418.
These results indicate that the burst emitting sites on the neutron star need
not be co-located with hot spots emitting the bulk of the persistent X-ray
emission. Finally, we show that there is a significant pulse phase dependence
of the XRT burst counts, likely demonstrating that the surface magnetic field
of SGR J1550-5418 is not uniform over the emission zone, since it is
anticipated that regions with stronger surface magnetic field could trigger
bursts more efficiently.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.3585 [pdf] - 1093039
Three years of Fermi GBM Earth Occultation Monitoring: Observations of
Hard X-ray/Soft Gamma-Ray Sources
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Case, Gary L.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Rodi, James;
Camero-Arranz, Ascension;
Jenke, Peter;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Beklen, Elif;
Finger, Mark;
Bhat, Narayan;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Greiner, Jochen;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2012-01-17, last modified: 2012-06-22
The Gamma ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board Fermi has been providing
continuous data to the astronomical community since 2008 August 12. In this
paper we present the results of the analysis of the first three years of these
continuous data using the Earth occultation technique to monitor a catalog of
209 sources. From this catalog, we detect 99 sources, including 40 low-mass
X-ray binary/neutron star systems, 31 high-mass X-ray binary neutron star
systems, 12 black hole binaries, 12 active galaxies, 2 other sources, plus the
Crab Nebula, and the Sun. Nine of these sources are detected in the 100-300 keV
band, including seven black-hole binaries, the active galaxy Cen A, and the
Crab. The Crab and Cyg X-1 are also detected in the 300-500 keV band. GBM
provides complementary data to other sky-monitors below 100 keV and is the only
all-sky monitor above 100 keV. Up-to-date light curves for all of the catalog
sources can be found at http://heastro.phys.lsu.edu/gbm/.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.4915 [pdf] - 546432
Detection of spectral evolution in the bursts emitted during the
2008-2009 active episode of SGR J1550 - 5418
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Gruber, David;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Granot, Jonathan;
Baring, Matthew G.;
Göğüş, Ersin;
Huppenkothen, Daniela;
Kaneko, Yuki;
Lin, Lin;
Watts, Anna L.;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Greiner, Jochen;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne
Submitted: 2012-06-21
In early October 2008, the Soft Gamma Repeater SGRJ1550 - 5418 (1E 1547.0 -
5408, AXJ155052 - 5418, PSR J1550 - 5418) became active, emitting a series of
bursts which triggered the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) after which a
second especially intense activity period commenced in 2009 January and a
third, less active period was detected in 2009 March-April. Here we analyze the
GBM data all the bursts from the first and last active episodes. We performed
temporal and spectral analysis for all events and found that their temporal
characteristics are very similar to the ones of other SGR bursts, as well the
ones reported for the bursts of the main episode (average burst durations \sim
170 ms). In addition, we used our sample of bursts to quantify the systematic
uncertainties of the GBM location algorithm for soft gamma-ray transients to <
8 deg. Our spectral analysis indicates significant spectral evolution between
the first and last set of events. Although the 2008 October events are best fit
with a single blackbody function, for the 2009 bursts an Optically Thin Thermal
Bremsstrahlung (OTTB) is clearly preferred. We attribute this evolution to
changes in the magnetic field topology of the source, possibly due to effects
following the very energetic main bursting episode.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.1876 [pdf] - 1077880
Panchromatic Observations of SN 2011dh Point to a Compact Progenitor
Star
Soderberg, Alicia M.;
Margutti, R.;
Zauderer, B. A.;
Krauss, M.;
Katz, B.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Dittmann, J. A.;
Nakar, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Kawai, N.;
Hurley, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Toizumi, T.;
Morii, M.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Gurwell, M.;
Petitpas, G.;
Rupen, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Fransson, C.;
Brunthaler, A.;
Bietenholz, M. F.;
Chugai, N.;
Grindlay, J.;
Copete, A.;
Connaughton, V.;
Briggs, M.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Rau, A.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2011-07-10, last modified: 2012-05-17
We report the discovery and detailed monitoring of X-ray emission associated
with the Type IIb SN 2011dh using data from the Swift and Chandra satellites,
placing it among the best studied X-ray supernovae to date. We further present
millimeter and radio data obtained with the SMA, CARMA, and EVLA during the
first three weeks after explosion. Combining these observations with early
optical photometry, we show that the panchromatic dataset is well-described by
non-thermal synchrotron emission (radio/mm) with inverse Compton scattering
(X-ray) of a thermal population of optical photons. In this scenario, the shock
partition fractions deviate from equipartition by a factor, (e_e/e_B) ~ 30. We
derive the properties of the shockwave and the circumstellar environment and
find a shock velocity, v~0.1c, and a progenitor mass loss rate of ~6e-5
M_sun/yr. These properties are consistent with the sub-class of Type IIb SNe
characterized by compact progenitors (Type cIIb) and dissimilar from those with
extended progenitors (Type eIIb). Furthermore, we consider the early optical
emission in the context of a cooling envelope model to estimate a progenitor
radius of ~1e+11 cm, in line with the expectations for a Type cIIb SN.
Together, these diagnostics are difficult to reconcile with the extended radius
of the putative yellow supergiant progenitor star identified in archival HST
observations, unless the stellar density profile is unusual. Finally, we
searched for the high energy shock breakout pulse using X-ray and gamma-ray
observations obtained during the purported explosion date range. Based on the
compact radius of the progenitor, we estimate that the breakout pulse was
detectable with current instruments but likely missed due to their limited
temporal/spatial coverage. [Abridged]
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.2363 [pdf] - 563775
SN 2010ay is a Luminous and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova within a
Low-metallicity Host Galaxy
Sanders, Nathan E.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Valenti, S.;
Foley, R. J.;
Chornock, R.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Berger, E.;
Smartt, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Narayan, G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Terada, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Cline, T.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Grav, T.;
Heasley, J. N.;
Hodapp, K. W.;
Jedicke, R.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. -P.;
Luppino, G. A.;
Lupton, R. H.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Monet, D. G.;
Morgan, J. S.;
Onaka, P. M.;
Price, P. A.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Waterson, M. F.
Submitted: 2011-10-11, last modified: 2012-04-05
We report on our serendipitous pre-discovery detection and detailed follow-up
of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova (SN) 2010ay at z = 0.067 imaged by the
Pan-STARRS1 3pi survey just ~4 days after explosion. The SN had a peak
luminosity, M_R ~ -20.2 mag, significantly more luminous than known GRB-SNe and
one of the most luminous SNe Ib/c ever discovered. The absorption velocity of
SN 2010ay is v_Si ~ 19,000 km/s at ~40 days after explosion, 2-5 times higher
than other broad-lined SNe and similar to the GRB-SN 2010bh at comparable
epochs. Moreover, the velocity declines ~2 times slower than other SNe Ic-BL
and GRB-SNe. Assuming that the optical emission is powered by radioactive
decay, the peak magnitude implies the synthesis of an unusually large mass of
56 Ni, M_Ni = 0.9 M_solar. Modeling of the light-curve points to a total ejecta
mass, M_ej ~ 4.7 M_sol, and total kinetic energy, E_K ~ 11x10^51 ergs. The
ratio of M_Ni to M_ej is ~2 times as large for SN 2010ay as typical GRB-SNe and
may suggest an additional energy reservoir. The metallicity (log(O/H)_PP04 + 12
= 8.19) of the explosion site within the host galaxy places SN 2010ay in the
low-metallicity regime populated by GRB-SNe, and ~0.5(0.2) dex lower than that
typically measured for the host environments of normal (broad-lined) Ic
supernovae. We constrain any gamma-ray emission with E_gamma < 6x10^{48} erg
(25-150 keV) and our deep radio follow-up observations with the Expanded Very
Large Array rule out relativistic ejecta with energy, E > 10^48 erg. We
therefore rule out the association of a relativistic outflow like those which
accompanied SN 1998bw and traditional long-duration GRBs, but place
less-stringent constraints on a weak afterglow like that seen from XRF 060218.
These observations challenge the importance of progenitor metallicity for the
production of a GRB, and suggest that other parameters also play a key role.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.3157 [pdf] - 1116646
SGR J1550-5418 bursts detected with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor
during its most prolific activity
van der Horst, A. J.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Gorgone, N. M.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Baring, M. G.;
Guiriec, S.;
Gogus, E.;
Granot, J.;
Watts, A. L.;
Lin, L.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Chaplin, V. L.;
Finger, M. H.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Gruber, D.;
Harding, A. K.;
Kaper, L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
van der Klis, M.;
McBreen, S.;
Mcenery, J.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Pe'er, A.;
Preece, R. D.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Rau, A.;
Wachter, S.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.;
Woods, P. M.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.
Submitted: 2012-02-14, last modified: 2012-02-28
We have performed detailed temporal and time-integrated spectral analysis of
286 bursts from SGR J1550-5418 detected with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor
(GBM) in January 2009, resulting in the largest uniform sample of temporal and
spectral properties of SGR J1550-5418 bursts. We have used the combination of
broadband and high time-resolution data provided with GBM to perform
statistical studies for the source properties. We determine the durations,
emission times, duty cycles and rise times for all bursts, and find that they
are typical of SGR bursts. We explore various models in our spectral analysis,
and conclude that the spectra of SGR J1550-5418 bursts in the 8-200 keV band
are equally well described by optically thin thermal bremsstrahlung (OTTB), a
power law with an exponential cutoff (Comptonized model), and two black-body
functions (BB+BB). In the spectral fits with the Comptonized model we find a
mean power-law index of -0.92, close to the OTTB index of -1. We show that
there is an anti-correlation between the Comptonized Epeak and the burst
fluence and average flux. For the BB+BB fits we find that the fluences and
emission areas of the two blackbody functions are correlated. The
low-temperature BB has an emission area comparable to the neutron star surface
area, independent of the temperature, while the high-temperature blackbody has
a much smaller area and shows an anti-correlation between emission area and
temperature. We compare the properties of these bursts with bursts observed
from other SGR sources during extreme activations, and discuss the implications
of our results in the context of magnetar burst models.
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.3099 [pdf] - 1092977
The Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Two Years
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Lichti, Giselher;
Lin, Lin;
McBreen, Sheila;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2012-01-15
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is designed to enhance the scientific
return from Fermi in studying gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In its first two years
of operation GBM triggered on 491 GRBs. We summarize the criteria used for
triggering and quantify the general characteristics of the triggered GRBs,
including their locations, durations, peak flux, and fluence. This catalog is
an official product of the Fermi GBM science team, and the data files
containing the complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics
Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.2981 [pdf] - 483399
The Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Catalog: The First Two Years
Goldstein, Adam;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Preece, Robert D.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
McGlynn, Sinead;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave
Submitted: 2012-01-13
We present systematic spectral analyses of GRBs detected by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) during its first two years of operation. This
catalog contains two types of spectra extracted from 487 GRBs, and by fitting
four different spectral models, this results in a compendium of over 3800
spectra. The models were selected based on their empirical importance to the
spectral shape of many GRBs, and the analysis performed was devised to be as
thorough and objective as possible. We describe in detail our procedure and
criteria for the analyses, and present the bulk results in the form of
parameter distributions. This catalog should be considered an official product
from the Fermi GBM Science Team, and the data files containing the complete
results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive
Research Center (HEASARC).
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4064 [pdf] - 1084208
Temporal Deconvolution study of Long and Short Gamma-Ray Burst Light
curves
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Paciesas, William;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burgess, Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty M.;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
McBreen, Sheila;
Preece, Robert;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-09-19
The light curves of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) are believed to result from
internal shocks reflecting the activity of the GRB central engine. Their
temporal deconvolution can reveal potential differences in the properties of
the central engines in the two populations of GRBs which are believed to
originate from the deaths of massive stars (long) and from mergers of compact
objects (short). We present here the results of the temporal analysis of 42
GRBs detected with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray
Space Telescope. We deconvolved the profiles into pulses, which we fit with
lognormal functions. The distributions of the pulse shape parameters and
intervals between neighboring pulses are distinct for both burst types and also
fit with lognormal functions. We have studied the evolution of these parameters
in different energy bands and found that they differ between long and short
bursts. We discuss the implications of the differences in the temporal
properties of long and short bursts within the framework of the internal shock
model for GRB prompt emission.
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.0991 [pdf] - 415236
Burst and Persistent Emission Properties during the Recent Active
Episode of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 1E 1841-045
Lin, Lin;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Gogus, Ersin;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Watts, Anna L.;
Baring, Matthew G.;
Kaneko, Yuki;
Wijers, Ralph A. M. J.;
Woods, Peter M.;
Barthelmy, Scott;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Gehrels, Neil;
Goldstein, Adam;
Granot, Jonathan;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Mcenery, Julie;
Preece, Robert D.;
Tierney, David;
van der Klis, Michiel;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Zhang, Shuang Nan
Submitted: 2011-09-05
Swift/BAT detected the first burst from 1E 1841-045 in May 2010 with
intermittent burst activity recorded through at least July 2011. Here we
present Swift and Fermi/GBM observations of this burst activity and search for
correlated changes to the persistent X-ray emission of the source. The T90
durations of the bursts range between 18-140 ms, comparable to other magnetar
burst durations, while the energy released in each burst ranges between (0.8 -
25)E38 erg, which is in the low side of SGR bursts. We find that the bursting
activity did not have a significant effect on the persistent flux level of the
source. We argue that the mechanism leading to this sporadic burst activity in
1E 1841-045 might not involve large scale restructuring (either crustal or
magnetospheric) as seen in other magnetar sources.
[64]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.6024 [pdf] - 1579374
Constraints on the Synchrotron Shock Model for the Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray
Burst 090820A
Burgess, J. Michael;
Preece, Robert D.;
Baring, Matthew G.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-07-29
Discerning the radiative dissipation mechanism for prompt emission in
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) requires detailed spectroscopic modeling that straddles
the $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak in the 100 keV - 1 MeV range. Historically, empirical
fits such as the popular Band function have been employed with considerable
success in interpreting the observations. While extrapolations of the Band
parameters can provide some physical insight into the emission mechanisms
responsible for GRBs, these inferences do not provide a unique way of
discerning between models. By fitting physical models directly this degeneracy
can be broken, eliminating the need for empirical functions; our analysis here
offers a first step in this direction. One of the oldest, and leading,
theoretical ideas for the production of the prompt signal is the synchrotron
shock model (SSM). Here we explore the applicability of this model to a bright
{\it Fermi} GBM burst with a simple temporal structure, GRB {\it 090820}A. Our
investigation implements, for the first time, thermal and non-thermal
synchrotron emissivities in the RMFIT forward-folding spectral analysis
software often used in GBM burst studies. We find that these synchrotron
emissivities, together with a blackbody shape, provide at least as good a match
with the data as the Band GRB spectral fitting function. This success is
achieved in both time-integrated and time-resolved spectral fits.
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.2399 [pdf] - 1077924
Quasi-Periodic Pulsations in Solar Flares: new clues from the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Gruber, D.;
Lachowicz, P.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Greiner, J.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Kanbach, G.;
Rau, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Diehl, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.
Submitted: 2011-07-12, last modified: 2011-07-17
In the last four decades it has been observed that solar flares show
quasi-periodic pulsations (QPPs) from the lowest, i.e. radio, to the highest,
i.e. gamma-ray, part of the electromagnetic spectrum. To this day, it is still
unclear which mechanism creates such QPPs. In this paper, we analyze four
bright solar flares which show compelling signatures of quasi-periodic behavior
and were observed with the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (\gbm) onboard the Fermi
satellite. Because GBM covers over 3 decades in energy (8 keV to 40 MeV) it can
be a key instrument to understand the physical processes which drive solar
flares. We tested for periodicity in the time series of the solar flares
observed by GBM by applying a classical periodogram analysis. However, contrary
to previous authors, we did not detrend the raw light curve before creating the
power spectral density spectrum (PSD). To assess the significance of the
frequencies we made use of a method which is commonly applied for X-ray
binaries and Seyfert galaxies. This technique takes into account the underlying
continuum of the PSD which for all of these sources has a P(f) ~ f^{-\alpha}
dependence and is typically labeled red-noise. We checked the reliability of
this technique by applying it to a solar flare which was observed by the Reuven
Ramaty High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) which contains, besides
any potential periodicity from the Sun, a 4 s rotational period due to the
rotation of the spacecraft around its axis. While we do not find an intrinsic
solar quasi-periodic pulsation we do reproduce the instrumental periodicity.
Moreover, with the method adopted here, we do not detect significant QPPs in
the four bright solar flares observed by GBM. We stress that for the purpose of
such kind of analyses it is of uttermost importance to appropriately account
for the red-noise component in the PSD of these astrophysical sources.
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.2121 [pdf] - 966981
Fermi/GBM Observations of SGR J0501+4516 Bursts
Lin, Lin;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Baring, Matthew G.;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Woods, Peter M.;
Gogus, Ersin;
Kaneko, Yuki;
Scargle, Jeffrey;
Granot, Jonathan;
Preece, Robert;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Watts, Anna L.;
Wijers, Ralph A. M. J.;
Zhang, Shuang Nan;
Bhat, Narayan;
Finger, Mark H.;
Gehrels, Neil;
Harding, Alice;
Kaper, Lex;
Kaspi, Victoria;
Mcenery, Julie;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pe'er, Asaf;
Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico;
van der Klis, Michiel;
Wachter, Stefanie;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-07-11
We present our temporal and spectral analyses of 29 bursts from SGR
J0501+4516, detected with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor onboard the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope during the 13 days of the source activation in 2008
(August 22 to September 3). We find that the T90 durations of the bursts can be
fit with a log-normal distribution with a mean value of ~ 123 ms. We also
estimate for the first time event durations of Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts
in photon space (i.e., using their deconvolved spectra) and find that these are
very similar to the T90s estimated in count space (following a log-normal
distribution with a mean value of ~ 124 ms). We fit the time-integrated spectra
for each burst and the time-resolved spectra of the five brightest bursts with
several models. We find that a single power law with an exponential cutoff
model fits all 29 bursts well, while 18 of the events can also be fit with two
black body functions. We expand on the physical interpretation of these two
models and we compare their parameters and discuss their evolution. We show
that the time-integrated and time-resolved spectra reveal that Epeak decreases
with energy flux (and fluence) to a minimum of ~30 keV at F=8.7e-6 erg/cm2/s,
increasing steadily afterwards. Two more sources exhibit a similar trend: SGRs
J1550-5418 and 1806-20. The isotropic luminosity corresponding to these flux
values is roughly similar for all sources (0.4-1.5 e40 erg/s).
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.5495 [pdf] - 1076293
Rest-frame properties of 32 gamma-ray bursts observed by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Gruber, D.;
Greiner, J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Goldstein, A.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Nardini, M.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Burgess, J. M.;
Chaplin, V. L.;
Diehl, R.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Foley, S.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Guiriec, S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Lin, L.;
McBreen, S.;
Meegan, C. A.;
E., F. Olivares;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Tierney, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.
Submitted: 2011-04-28, last modified: 2011-05-03
Aims: In this paper we study the main spectral and temporal properties of
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed by Fermi/GBM. We investigate these key
properties of GRBs in the rest-frame of the progenitor and test for possible
intra-parameter correlations to better understand the intrinsic nature of these
events. Methods: Our sample comprises 32 GRBs with measured redshift that were
observed by GBM until August 2010. 28 of them belong to the long-duration
population and 4 events were classified as short/hard bursts. For all of these
events we derive, where possible, the intrinsic peak energy in the $\nu
F_{\nu}$ spectrum (\eprest), the duration in the rest-frame, defined as the
time in which 90% of the burst fluence was observed (\tninetyrest) and the
isotropic equivalent bolometric energy (\eiso). Results: The distribution of
\eprest has mean and median values of 1.1 MeV and 750 keV, respectively. A
log-normal fit to the sample of long bursts peaks at ~800 keV. No high-\ep
population is found but the distribution is biased against low \ep values. We
find the lowest possible \ep that GBM can recover to be ~ 15 keV. The
\tninetyrest distribution of long GRBs peaks at ~10 s. The distribution of
\eiso has mean and median values of $8.9\times 10^{52}$ erg and $8.2 \times
10^{52}$ erg, respectively. We confirm the tight correlation between \eprest
and \eiso (Amati relation) and the one between \eprest and the 1-s peak
luminosity ($L_p$) (Yonetoku relation). Additionally, we observe a parameter
reconstruction effect, i.e. the low-energy power law index $\alpha$ gets softer
when \ep is located at the lower end of the detector energy range. Moreover, we
do not find any significant cosmic evolution of neither \eprest nor
\tninetyrest.
[68]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4079 [pdf] - 1941794
Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts from Six Magnetars
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abernathy, M.;
Accadia, T.;
Acerneseac, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R.;
Affeldt, C.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G. S.;
Ceron, E. Amador;
Amariutei, D.;
Amin, R. S.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Antonuccia, F.;
Arai, K.;
Arain, M. A.;
Araya, M. C.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astonea, P.;
Atkinson, D.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S.;
Barker, D.;
Barnum, S.;
Baroneac, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barriga, P.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Bastarrika, M.;
Bastiab, A.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauera, Th. S.;
Behnke, B.;
Bekera, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Belletoile, A.;
Belopolski, I.;
Benacquista, M.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beveridge, N.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birindellia, S.;
Biswas, R.;
Bitossia, M.;
Bizouarda, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bland, B.;
Bloma, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bondarescu, R.;
Bondub, F.;
Bonelliab, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschia, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosia, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Boyle, M.;
Braccinia, S.;
Bradaschiaa, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brilleta, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brissona, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brummit, A.;
Budzyńskib, R.;
Bulikbc, T.;
Bultenab, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burguet--Castell, J.;
Burmeister, O.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnolia, G.;
Cain, J.;
Calloniab, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campagnaab, E.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cannon, K.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavaliera, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cellaa, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarinib, E.;
Chaibia, O.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chalkley, E.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, C. T. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D.;
Clark, J.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Clevaa, F.;
Cocciaab, E.;
Colacinoab, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Collaab, A.;
Colombinib, M.;
Conte, R.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsia, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulona, J. -P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cruise, A. M.;
Culter, R. M.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dahl, K.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Dannenberg, R.;
D'Antonioa, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Das, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Daviera, M.;
Davies, G.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
De Rosaab, R.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
del Preteac, M.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Di Fiorea, L.;
Di Lietoab, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Emilioac, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilioa, A.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Dorsher, S.;
Douglas, E. S. D.;
Dragocd, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edgar, M.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Engel, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafoneab, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, Y.;
Farr, B. F.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Ferranteab, I.;
Fidecaroab, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Flanigan, M.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Fortea, L. A.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fourniera, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frascaab, S.;
Frasconia, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoniab, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garofoli, J. A.;
Garufiab, F.;
Gáspár, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennaia, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazottoa, A.;
Gill, C.;
Goetz, E.;
Goggin, L. M.;
González, G.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Greveriea, C.;
Grosso, R.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidiab, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gupta, R.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hage, B.;
Hallam, J. M.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Hayaub, J. -F.;
Hayler, T.;
Heefner, J.;
Heitmann, H.;
Helloa, P.;
Hendry, M. A.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Herrera, V.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Jaranowskid, P.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, R.;
Ju, L.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kells, W.;
Kelner, M.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, H.;
Kim, N.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kopparapu, R.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalskab, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnamurthy, S.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królakae, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Leong, J.;
Leonor, I.;
Leroya, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, J.;
Lia, T. G. F.;
Liguoriab, N.;
Lindquist, P. E.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lodhia, D.;
Lorenzinia, M.;
Lorietteb, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdoa, G.;
Lu, P.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majoranaa, E.;
Maksimovicb, I.;
Mana, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovaniac, M.;
Marandi, A.;
Marchesonia, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelliab, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McKechan, D. J. A.;
Meadors, G.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Melissinos, A. C.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merill, L.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Milanoab, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkova, Y.;
Mino, Y.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Moe, B.;
Moesta, P.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohanty, S. D.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgiaab, A.;
Moscaab, S.;
Moscatellia, V.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow--Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Munch, J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nash, T.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Neriab, I.;
Newton, G.;
Nishida, E.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oldenburg, R. G.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Page, A.;
Pagliaroliac, G.;
Palladinoac, L.;
Palombaa, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paolettia, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parameswaran, A.;
Pardiab, S.;
Parisiab, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquietiab, R.;
Passuelloa, D.;
Patel, P.;
Pathak, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Penn, S.;
Peralta, C.;
Perreca, A.;
Persichettiab, G.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichota, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanniab, F.;
Pietkad, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Pletsch, H. J.;
Plissi, M. V.;
Podkaminer, J.;
Poggianiab, R.;
Pöld, J.;
Postiglione, F.;
Prato, M.;
Predoi, V.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodiab, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturoa, M.;
Puppoa, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabelingab, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C. R.;
Rankins, B.;
Rapagnaniab, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Reab, V.;
Redwine, K.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbaua, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricciab, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Roberts, P.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robineta, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Robinson, E. L.;
Rocchia, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romanoac, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińskacf, D.;
Röver, C.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sakata, S.;
Sakosky, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Salit, M.;
Sammut, L.;
de la Jordana, L. Sancho;
Sandberg, V.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santamaría, L.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Santostasi, G.;
Saraf, S.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Sato, S.;
Satterthwaite, M.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Schilling, R.;
Schlamminger, S.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Searle, A. C.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Weerathunga, T. Shihan;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sibley, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R.;
Somiya, K.;
Sorazu, B.;
Soto, J.;
Speirits, F. C.;
Sperandioab, L.;
Stefszky, M.;
Stein, A. J.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturaniab, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sung, M.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Szokoly, G. P.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, J. R.;
Taylor, R.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Thüring, A.;
Titsler, C.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toncelliab, A.;
Tonelliab, M.;
Torreac, O.;
Torres, C.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travassoab, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trias, M.;
Tseng, K.;
Turner, L.;
Ugolini, D.;
Urbanek, K.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vaishnav, B.;
Vajenteab, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Brandab, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Puttena, S.;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vavoulidisa, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovatoc, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veltkamp, C.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetranoab, F.;
Viceréab, A.;
Villar, A. E.;
Vineta, J. -Y.;
Voccaa, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Wallace, L.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Wasa, M.;
Wei, P.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wen, S.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Willems, P. A.;
Williams, H. R.;
Williams, L.;
Willke, B.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Woan, G.;
Wooley, R.;
Worden, J.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yu, P.;
Yvert, M.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, Z.;
Zhao, C.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Boynton, W. V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cline, T. L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J. O;
Golovin, D.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Kaneko, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Lin, L.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Ohno, M.;
Palshin, V. D.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Terada, Y.;
Yamaoka, K.
Submitted: 2010-11-17, last modified: 2011-04-15
Soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) are thought to
be magnetars: neutron stars powered by extreme magnetic fields. These rare
objects are characterized by repeated and sometimes spectacular gamma-ray
bursts. The burst mechanism might involve crustal fractures and excitation of
non-radial modes which would emit gravitational waves (GWs). We present the
results of a search for GW bursts from six galactic magnetars that is sensitive
to neutron star f-modes, thought to be the most efficient GW emitting
oscillatory modes in compact stars. One of them, SGR 0501+4516, is likely ~1
kpc from Earth, an order of magnitude closer than magnetars targeted in
previous GW searches. A second, AXP 1E 1547.0-5408, gave a burst with an
estimated isotropic energy >10^{44} erg which is comparable to the giant
flares. We find no evidence of GWs associated with a sample of 1279
electromagnetic triggers from six magnetars occurring between November 2006 and
June 2009, in GW data from the LIGO, Virgo, and GEO600 detectors. Our lowest
model-dependent GW emission energy upper limits for band- and time-limited
white noise bursts in the detector sensitive band, and for f-mode ringdowns (at
1090 Hz), are 3.0x10^{44} d_1^2 erg and 1.4x10^{47} d_1^2 erg respectively,
where d_1 = d_{0501} / 1 kpc and d_{0501} is the distance to SGR 0501+4516.
These limits on GW emission from f-modes are an order of magnitude lower than
any previous, and approach the range of electromagnetic energies seen in SGR
giant flares for the first time.
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.2679 [pdf] - 300664
When A Standard Candle Flickers
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Baumgartner, Wayne H.;
Beklen, Elif;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Camero-Arranz, Ascension;
Case, Gary L.;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Finger, Mark H.;
Gehrels, Neil;
Greiner, Jochen;
Jahoda, Keith;
Jenke, Peter;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Krimm, Hans A.;
Kuulkers, Erik;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Natalucci, Lorenzo;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert;
Rodi, James C.;
Shaposhnikov, Nikolai;
Skinner, Gerald K.;
Swartz, Doug;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Diehl, Roland;
Zhang, Xiao-Ling
Submitted: 2010-10-13, last modified: 2011-02-03
The Crab Nebula is the only hard X-ray source in the sky that is both bright
enough and steady enough to be easily used as a standard candle. As a result,
it has been used as a normalization standard by most X-ray/gamma ray
telescopes. Although small-scale variations in the nebula are well-known, since
the start of science operations of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) in
August 2008, a ~ 7% (70 mcrab) decline has been observed in the overall Crab
Nebula flux in the 15 - 50 keV band, measured with the Earth occultation
technique. This decline is independently confirmed with three other
instruments: the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (Swift/BAT), the Rossi X-ray
Timing Explorer Proportional Counter Array (RXTE/PCA), and the INTErnational
Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory Imager on Board INTEGRAL (IBIS). A similar
decline is also observed in the ~3 - 15 keV data from the RXTE/PCA and INTEGRAL
Joint European Monitor (JEM-X) and in the 50 - 100 keV band with GBM and
INTEGRAL/IBIS. Observations from 100 to 500 keV with GBM suggest that the
decline may be larger at higher energies. The pulsed flux measured with
RXTE/PCA since 1999 is consistent with the pulsar spin-down, indicating that
the observed changes are nebular. Correlated variations in the Crab Nebula flux
on a ~3 year timescale are also seen independently with the PCA, BAT, and IBIS
from 2005 to 2008, with a flux minimum in April 2007. As of August 2010, the
current flux has declined below the 2007 minimum.
[70]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.3325 [pdf] - 1051490
First-year Results of Broadband Spectroscopy of the Brightest Fermi-GBM
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Lichti, Giselher;
Bhat, P. N.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kippen, Marc;
Lin, Lin;
McBreen, Sheila;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-01-17
We present here our results of the temporal and spectral analysis of a sample
of 52 bright and hard gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed with the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM) during its first year of operation (July 2008-July 2009).
Our sample was selected from a total of 253 GBM GRBs based on each event peak
count rate measured between 0.2 and 40MeV. The final sample comprised 34 long
and 18 short GRBs. These numbers show that the GBM sample contains a much
larger fraction of short GRBs, than the CGRO/BATSE data set, which we explain
as the result of our (different) selection criteria and the improved GBM
trigger algorithms, which favor collection of short, bright GRBs over BATSE. A
first by-product of our selection methodology is the determination of a
detection threshold from the GBM data alone, above which GRBs most likely will
be detected in the MeV/GeV range with the Large Area Telescope (LAT) onboard
Fermi. This predictor will be very useful for future multiwavelength GRB follow
ups with ground and space based observatories. Further we have estimated the
burst durations up to 10MeV and for the first time expanded the duration-energy
relationship in the GRB light curves to high energies. We confirm that GRB
durations decline with energy as a power law with index approximately -0.4, as
was found earlier with the BATSE data and we also notice evidence of a possible
cutoff or break at higher energies. Finally, we performed time-integrated
spectral analysis of all 52 bursts and compared their spectral parameters with
those obtained with the larger data sample of the BATSE data. We find that the
two parameter data sets are similar and confirm that short GRBs are in general
harder than longer ones.
[71]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2458 [pdf] - 956040
A New Derivation of GRB Jet Opening Angles from the Prompt Gamma-Ray
Emission
Goldstein, Adam;
Preece, Robert D.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
McBreen, Sheila;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-01-12
The jet opening angle of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is an important parameter
for determining the characteristics of the progenitor, and the information
contained in the opening angle gives insight into the relativistic outflow and
the total energy that is contained in the burst. Unfortunately, a confident
inference of the jet opening angle usually requires broadband measurement of
the afterglow of the GRB, from the X-ray down to the radio and from minutes to
days after the prompt gamma-ray emission, which may be difficult to obtain. For
this reason, very few of all detected GRBs have constrained jet angles. We
present an alternative approach to derive jet opening angles from the prompt
emission of the GRB, given that the GRB has a measurable Epeak and fluence, and
which does not require any afterglow measurements. We present the distribution
of derived jet opening angles for the first two years of the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM) operation, and we compare a number of our derived opening
angles to the reported opening angles using the traditional afterglow method.
We derive the collimation-corrected gamma-ray energy, E_{\gamma}, for GRBs with
redshift and find that some of the GRBs in our sample are inconsistent with a
proto-magnetar progenitor. Finally, we show that the use of the derived jet
opening angles results in a tighter correlation between the rest-frame Epeak
and E_{\gamma} than has previously been presented, which places long GRBs and
short GRBs onto one empirical power law.
[72]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.1099 [pdf] - 1042912
Fermi/GBM observations of the ultra-long GRB 091024: A burst with an
optical flash
Gruber, D.;
Krühler, T.;
Foley, S.;
Nardini, M.;
Burlon, D.;
Rau, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
Greiner, J.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burgess, J. M.;
Chaplin, V. L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Diehl, R.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Guiriec, S.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Lin, L.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Tierney, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.
Submitted: 2011-01-05
In this paper we examine gamma-ray and optical data of GRB 091024, a
gamma-ray burst (GRB) with an extremely long duration of T90~1020 s, as
observed with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). We present spectral
analysis of all three distinct emission episodes using data from Fermi/GBM.
Because of the long nature of this event, many ground-based optical telescopes
slewed to its location within a few minutes and thus were able to observe the
GRB during its active period. We compare the optical and gamma-ray light
curves. Furthermore, we estimate a lower limit on the bulk Lorentz factor from
the variability and spectrum of the GBM light curve and compare it with that
obtained from the peak time of the forward shock of the optical afterglow. From
the spectral analysis we note that, despite its unusually long duration, this
burst is similar to other long GRBs, i.e. there is spectral evolution (both the
peak energy and the spectral index vary with time) and spectral lags are
measured. We find that the optical light curve is highly anti-correlated to the
prompt gamma-ray emission, with the optical emission reaching the maximum
during an epoch of quiescence in the prompt emission. We interpret this
behavior as the reverse shock (optical flash), expected in the
internal-external shock model of GRB emission but observed only in a handful of
GRBs so far. The lower limit on the initial Lorentz factor deduced from the
variability time scale ($\Gamma_{min}=195_{-110}^+{90}$)is consistent within
the error to the one obtained using the peak time of the forward shock
($\Gamma_0=120$) and is also consistent with Lorentz factors of other long
GRBs.
[73]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.4658 [pdf] - 1042704
Radio and Gamma-Ray Constraints on the Emission Geometry and Birthplace
of PSR J2043+2740
Noutsos, A.;
Abdo, A. A.;
Ackermann, M.;
Ajello, M.;
Ballet, J.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Berenji, B.;
Bonamente, E.;
Borgland, A. W.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brez, A.;
Brigida, M.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Busetto, G.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Camilo, F.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Casandjian, J. M.;
Cecchi, C.;
Celik, O.;
Chaty, S.;
Chekhtman, A.;
Chiang, J.;
Ciprini, S.;
Claus, R.;
Cognard, I.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Cutini, S.;
Dermer, C. D.;
de Palma, F.;
Drell, P. S.;
Dumora, D.;
Espinoza, C. M.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Ferrara, E. C.;
Focke, W. B.;
Frailis, M.;
Freire, P. C. C.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Germani, S.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Godfrey, G.;
Grandi, P.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Grove, J. E.;
Guillemot, L.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harding, A. K.;
Hughes, R. E.;
Jackson, M. S.;
Johannesson, G.;
Johnson, A. S.;
Johnson, T. J.;
Johnson, W. N.;
Johnston, S.;
Kamae, T.;
Katagiri, H.;
Kataoka, J.;
Knoedlseder, J.;
Kramer, M.;
Kuss, M.;
Lande, J.;
Lee, S. -H.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lovellette, M. N.;
Lubrano, P.;
Lyne, A. G.;
Makeev, A.;
Marelli, M.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Mehault, J.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monte, C.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Murgia, S.;
Naumann-Godo, M.;
Nolan, P. L.;
Nuss, E.;
Ohsugi, T.;
Okumura, A.;
Omodei, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Ormes, J. F.;
Panetta, J. H.;
Parent, D.;
Pelassa, V.;
Pepe, M.;
Persic, M.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Piron, F.;
Porter, T. A.;
Rain, S.;
Ray, P. S.;
Razzano, M.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Reposeur, T.;
Romani, R. W.;
Sadrozinski, H. F. -W.;
Sander, A.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Sgro, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Smith, D. A.;
Smith, P. D.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Stappers, B. W.;
Strickman, M. S.;
Suson, D. J.;
Takahashi, H.;
Tanaka, T.;
Theureau, G.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Thorsett, S. E.;
Tibolla, O.;
Torres, D. F.;
Tramacere, A.;
Usher, T. L.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Vianello, G.;
Vilchez, N.;
Villata, M.;
Vitale, V.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Waite, A. P.;
Wang, P.;
Watters, K.;
Weltevrede, P.;
Winer, B. L.;
Wood, K. S.;
Ziegler, M.
Submitted: 2010-12-21
We report on the first year of Fermi gamma-ray observations of pulsed
high-energy emission from the old PSR J2043+2740. The study of the gamma-ray
efficiency of such old pulsars gives us an insight into the evolution of
pulsars' ability to emit in gammma rays as they age. The gamma-ray lightcurve
of this pulsar above 0.1 GeV is clearly defined by two sharp peaks,
0.353+/-0.035 periods apart. We have combined the gamma-ray profile
characteristics of PSR J2043+2740 with the geometrical properties of the
pulsar's radio emission, derived from radio polarization data, and constrained
the pulsar-beam geometry in the framework of a Two Pole Caustic and an Outer
Gap model. The ranges of magnetic inclination and viewing angle were determined
to be {alpha,zeta}~{52-57,61-68} for the Two Pole Caustic model, and
{alpha,zeta}~{62-73,74-81} and {alpha,zeta}~{72-83,60-75} for the Outer Gap
model. Based on this geometry, we assess possible birth locations for this
pulsar and derive a likely proper motion, sufficiently high to be measurable
with VLBI. At a characteristic age of 1.2 Myr, PSR J2043+2740 is the third
oldest of all discovered, non-recycled, gamma-ray pulsars: it is twice as old
as the next oldest, PSR J0357+32, and younger only than the recently discovered
PSR J1836+5925 and PSR J2055+25, both of which are at least 5 and 10 times less
energetic, respectively.
[74]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.4601 [pdf] - 289034
Detection of a Thermal Spectral Component in the Prompt Emission of GRB
100724B
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, Michael;
Ryde, Felix;
Daigne, Frédéric;
Mészáros, Peter;
Goldstein, Adam;
McEnery, Julie;
Omodei, Nicola;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Camero-Arranz, Ascensión;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty M.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William;
Preece, Robert;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2010-10-21, last modified: 2010-11-30
Observations of GRB 100724B with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) find
that the spectrum is dominated by the typical Band functional form, which is
usually taken to represent a non-thermal emission component, but also includes
a statistically highly significant thermal spectral contribution. The
simultaneous observation of the thermal and non-thermal components allows us to
confidently identify the two emission components. The fact that these seem to
vary independently favors the idea that the thermal component is of
photospheric origin while the dominant non-thermal emission occurs at larger
radii. Our results imply either a very high efficiency for the non-thermal
process, or a very small size of the region at the base of the flow, both quite
challenging for the standard fireball model. These problems are resolved if the
jet is initially highly magnetized and has a substantial Poynting flux.
[75]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.5045 [pdf] - 271636
Time-Resolved Spectroscopy of the 3 Brightest and Hardest Short
Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed with the FGST Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaugthon, Valerie;
Kara, Erin;
Daigne, Frederic;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Paciesas, William;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Foley, Suzanne;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burgess, Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
McBreen, Sheila;
Preece, Robert;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2010-09-25, last modified: 2010-11-30
From July 2008 to October 2009, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board
the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope (FGST) has detected 320 Gamma-Ray Bursts
(GRBs). About 20% of these events are classified as short based on their T90
duration below 2 s. We present here for the first time time-resolved
spectroscopy at timescales as short as 2 ms for the three brightest short GRBs
observed with GBM. The time-integrated spectra of the events deviate from the
Band function, indicating the existence of an additional spectral component,
which can be fit by a power-law with index ~-1.5. The time-integrated Epeak
values exceed 2 MeV for two of the bursts, and are well above the values
observed in the brightest long GRBs. Their Epeak values and their low-energy
power-law indices ({\alpha}) confirm that short GRBs are harder than long ones.
We find that short GRBs are very similar to long ones, but with light curves
contracted in time and with harder spectra stretched towards higher energies.
In our time-resolved spectroscopy analysis, we find that the Epeak values range
from a few tens of keV up to more than 6 MeV. In general, the hardness
evolutions during the bursts follows their flux/intensity variations, similar
to long bursts. However, we do not always see the Epeak leading the light-curve
rises, and we confirm the zero/short average light-curve spectral lag below 1
MeV, already established for short GRBs. We also find that the time-resolved
low-energy power-law indices of the Band function mostly violate the limits
imposed by the synchrotron models for both slow and fast electron cooling and
may require additional emission processes to explain the data. Finally, we
interpreted these observations in the context of the current existing models
and emission mechanisms for the prompt emission of GRBs.
[76]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.4953 [pdf] - 1040832
First Results from Fermi GBM Earth Occultation Monitoring: Observations
of Soft Gamma-Ray Sources Above 100 keV
Case, Gary L.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Rodi, James C.;
Jenke, Peter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Finger, Mark H.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Camero-Arranz, Ascencion;
Beklen, Elif;
Bhat, P. Narayan;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert;
Kippen, R. Marc;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Griener, Jochen
Submitted: 2010-09-24
The NaI and BGO detectors on the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on Fermi are
now being used for long-term monitoring of the hard X-ray/low energy gamma-ray
sky. Using the Earth occultation technique as demonstrated previously by the
BATSE instrument on the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory, GBM can be used to
produce multiband light curves and spectra for known sources and transient
outbursts in the 8 keV to 1 MeV energy range with its NaI detectors and up to
40 MeV with its BGO detectors. Over 85% of the sky is viewed every orbit, and
the precession of the Fermi orbit allows the entire sky to be viewed every ~26
days with sensitivity exceeding that of BATSE at energies below ~25 keV and
above ~1.5 MeV. We briefly describe the technique and present preliminary
results using the NaI detectors after the first two years of observations at
energies above 100 keV. Eight sources are detected with a significance greater
than 7 sigma: the Crab, Cyg X-1, SWIFT J1753.5-0127, 1E 1740-29, Cen A, GRS
1915+105, and the transient sources XTE J1752-223 and GX 339-4. Two of the
sources, the Crab and Cyg X-1, have also been detected above 300 keV.
[77]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2709 [pdf] - 231069
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the HETE-2 Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalog
Hurley, K.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Barthelmy, K. Harshman S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, C. E.;
Rossi, F.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Goldsten, R. Starr J.;
Gold, R.
Submitted: 2009-07-15, last modified: 2010-09-22
Between 2000 November and 2006 May, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network (IPN) detected 226 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were
also detected by the FREGATE experiment aboard the HETE-II spacecraft. During
this period, the IPN consisted of up to nine spacecraft, and using
triangulation, the localizations of 157 bursts were obtained. We present the
IPN localization data on these events.
[78]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.5544 [pdf] - 1018545
Discovery of a new Soft Gamma Repeater: SGR J0418+5729
van der Horst, A. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Gogus, E.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Wachter, S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Granot, J.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Woods, P. M.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J. R.;
Finger, M. H.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gelino, C. R.;
Gelino, D. M.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mazets, E. P.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Pe'er, A.;
Svinkin, D.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
van der Klis, M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Watts, A. L.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2009-11-30, last modified: 2010-01-19
On 2009 June 5, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray
Space Telescope triggered on two short, and relatively dim bursts with spectral
properties similar to Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts. Independent
localizations of the bursts by triangulation with the Konus-RF and with the
Swift satellite, confirmed their origin from the same, previously unknown,
source. The subsequent discovery of X-ray pulsations with the Rossi X-ray
Timing Explorer (RXTE), confirmed the magnetar nature of the new source, SGR
J0418+5729. We describe here the Fermi/GBM observations, the discovery and the
localization of this new SGR, and our infrared and Chandra X-ray observations.
We also present a detailed temporal and spectral study of the two GBM bursts.
SGR J0418+5729 is the second source discovered in the same region of the sky in
the last year, the other one being SGR J0501+4516. Both sources lie in the
direction of the galactic anti-center and presumably at the nearby distance of
~2 kpc (assuming they reside in the Perseus arm of our galaxy). The
near-threshold GBM detection of bursts from SGR J0418+5729 suggests that there
may be more such dim SGRs throughout our galaxy, possibly exceeding the
population of bright SGRs. Finally, using sample statistics, we conclude that
the implications of the new SGR discovery on the number of observable active
magnetars in our galaxy at any given time is <10, in agreement with our earlier
estimates.
[79]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[80]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.4636 [pdf] - 902526
Magnetar Twists: Fermi/Gamma ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detection of SGR
J1550-5418
Kaneko, Y.;
Gogus, E.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Granot, J.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Watts, A. L.;
Finger, M. H.;
Gehrels, N.;
Pe'er, A.;
van der Klis, M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wachter, S.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Woods, P. M.
Submitted: 2009-11-24, last modified: 2009-12-16
SGR J1550-5418 (previously known as AXP 1E 1547.0-5408 or PSR J1550-5418)
went into three active bursting episodes in 2008 October and in 2009 January
and March, emitting hundreds of typical Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts in
soft gamma-rays. The second episode was especially intense, and our untriggered
burst search on Fermi/GBM data (8-1000 keV) revealed ~450 bursts emitted over
24 hours during the peak of this activity. Using the GBM data, we identified a
~150-s-long enhanced persistent emission during 2009 January 22 that exhibited
intriguing timing and spectral properties: (i) clear pulsations up to ~110 keV
at the spin period of the neutron star (P ~ 2.07 s, the fastest of all
magnetars), (ii) an additional (to a power-law) blackbody component required
for the enhanced emission spectra with kT ~ 17 keV, (iii) pulsed fraction that
is strongly energy dependent and highest in the 50-74 keV energy band. A total
isotropic-equivalent energy emitted during this enhanced emission is estimated
to be 2.9 x 10^{40} (D/5 kpc)^2 erg. The estimated area of the blackbody
emitting region of ~0.046(D/5 kpc)^2 km^2 (roughly a few x 10^{-5} of the
neutron star area) is the smallest "hot spot" ever measured for a magnetar and
most likely corresponds to the size of magnetically-confined plasma near the
neutron star surface.
[81]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2462 [pdf] - 1002894
A new analysis of the short-duration, hard-spectrum GRB 051103, a
possible extragalactic SGR giant flare
Hurley, K.;
Rowlinson, A.;
Bellm, E.;
Perley, D.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshmann, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Nakagawa, Y. E.;
Smith, D. M.;
Cline, T.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Wiersema, K.;
Rol, E.;
Levan, A.;
Rhoads, J.;
Fruchter, A.;
Bersier, D.;
Kavelaars, J. J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Duncan, R. C.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Ricker, G.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2009-07-14, last modified: 2009-11-23
GRB 051103 is considered to be a candidate soft gamma repeater (SGR)
extragalactic giant magnetar flare by virtue of its proximity on the sky to
M81/M82, as well as its time history, localization, and energy spectrum. We
have derived a refined interplanetary network localization for this burst which
reduces the size of the error box by over a factor of two. We examine its time
history for evidence of a periodic component, which would be one signature of
an SGR giant flare, and conclude that this component is neither detected nor
detectable under reasonable assumptions. We analyze the time-resolved energy
spectra of this event with improved time- and energy resolution, and conclude
that although the spectrum is very hard, its temporal evolution at late times
cannot be determined, which further complicates the giant flare association. We
also present new optical observations reaching limiting magnitudes of R > 24.5,
about 4 magnitudes deeper than previously reported. In tandem with
serendipitous observations of M81 taken immediately before and one month after
the burst, these place strong constraints on any rapidly variable sources in
the region of the refined error ellipse proximate to M81. We do not find any
convincing afterglow candidates from either background galaxies or sources in
M81, although within the refined error region we do locate two UV bright star
forming regions which may host SGRs. A supernova remnant (SNR) within the error
ellipse could provide further support for an SGR giant flare association, but
we were unable to identify any SNR within the error ellipse. These data still
do not allow strong constraints on the nature of the GRB 051103 progenitor, and
suggest that candidate extragalactic SGR giant flares will be difficult,
although not impossible, to confirm.
[82]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.0450 [pdf] - 1003263
The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Meegan, Charles;
Lichti, Giselher;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald;
Greiner, Jochen;
Hoover, Andrew S.;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, Robert;
Steinle, Helmut;
Wallace, Mark S.;
Wilson, Robert B.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2009-08-04
The Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) will significantly augment the science
return from the Fermi Observatory in the study of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). The
primary objective of GBM is to extend the energy range over which bursts are
observed downward from the energy range of the Large Area Telescope (LAT) on
Fermi into the hard X-ray range where extensive previous data exist. A
secondary objective is to compute burst locations on-board to allow
re-orientiong the spacecraft so that the LAT can observe delayed emission from
bright bursts. GBM uses an array of twelve sodium iodide scintillators and two
bismuth germanate scintillators to detect gamma rays from ~8 keV to ~40 MeV
over the full unocculted sky. The on-board trigger threshold is ~0.7
photons/cm2/s (50-300 keV, 1 s peak). GBM generates on-board triggers for ~250
GRBs per year.
[83]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.0414 [pdf] - 26972
The Twin Magnetars: SGR 1627-41 and 1E 1547-5408
Mereghetti, S.;
Tiengo, A.;
Esposito, P.;
Vianello, G.;
De Luca, A.;
Gotz, D.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Israel, G. L.;
Stella, L.;
Rea, N.;
Turolla, R.;
Zane, S.
Submitted: 2009-08-04
We report on recent results obtained thanks to Target of Opportunity
observations of the two galactic sources SGR 1627-41 and 1E 1547-5408. These
two transient sources present several similarities which support the
interpretation of Anomalous X-ray Pulsars and Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters as a
single class of strongly magnetized neutron stars.
[84]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.1974 [pdf] - 315698
Strong bursts from the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 1547.0-5408 observed
with the INTEGRAL/SPI Anti-Coincidence Shield
Mereghetti, S.;
Gotz, D.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Esposito, P.;
Tiengo, A.;
Vianello, G.;
Israel, G. L.;
Stella, L.;
Turolla, R.;
Rea, N.;
Zane, S.
Submitted: 2009-03-11
In January 2009, multiple short bursts of soft gamma-rays were detected from
the direction of the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 1547.0-5408 by different
satellites. Here we report on the observations obtained with the INTEGRAL
SPI-ACS detector during the period with the strongest bursting activity. More
than 200 bursts were detected at energies above 80 keV in a few hours on
January 22. Among these, two remarkably bright events showed pulsating tails
lasting several seconds and modulated at the 2.1 s spin period of 1E
1547.0-5408. The energy released in the brightest of these bursts was of a few
10^43 erg, for an assumed distance of 10 kpc. This is smaller than that of the
three giant flares seen from soft gamma-ray repeaters, but higher than that of
typical bursts from soft gamma-ray repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars.
[85]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.2908 [pdf] - 19533
Ground-based calibration and characterization of the Fermi Gamma-Ray
Burst Monitor Detectors
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Lichti, Giselher G.;
Steinle, Helmut;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Hoover, Andrew S.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Krumrey, Michael;
Gerlach, Martin;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Greiner, Jochen;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2008-12-16
One of the scientific objectives of NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope is
the study of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
was designed to detect and localize bursts for the Fermi mission. By means of
an array of 12 NaI(Tl) (8 keV to 1 MeV) and two BGO (0.2 to 40 MeV)
scintillation detectors, GBM extends the energy range (20 MeV to > 300 GeV) of
Fermi's main instrument, the Large Area Telescope, into the traditional range
of current GRB databases. The physical detector response of the GBM instrument
to GRBs is determined with the help of Monte Carlo simulations, which are
supported and verified by on-ground individual detector calibration
measurements. We present the principal instrument properties, which have been
determined as a function of energy and angle, including the channel-energy
relation, the energy resolution, the effective area and the spatial
homogeneity.
[86]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.2577 [pdf] - 12722
INTEGRAL observations of the blazar Mrk 421 in outburst (Results of a
multi-wavelength campaign)
Lichti, G. G.;
Bottacini, E.;
Ajello, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Collmar, W.;
Falcone, A.;
Horan, D.;
Huber, S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lindfors, E.;
Morris, D.;
Nilsson, K.;
Petry, D.;
Rüger, M.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Spanier, F.;
Tornikoski, M.
Submitted: 2008-05-16
We report the results of a multi-wavelength campaign on the blazar Mrk 421
during outburst. We observed four strong flares at X-ray energies that were not
seen at other wavelengths (partially because of missing data). From the fastest
rise in the X-rays, an upper limit could be derived on the extension of the
emission region. A time lag between high-energy and low-energy X-rays was
observed, which allowed an estimation of the magnetic-field strength. The
spectral analysis of the X-rays revealed a slight spectral hardening of the
low-energy (3 - 43 keV) spectral index. The hardness-ratio analysis of the
Swift-XRT (0.2 - 10 keV) data indicated a small correlation with the intensity;
i. e., a hard-to-soft evolution was observed. At the energies of IBIS/ISGRI (20
- 150 keV), such correlations are less obvious. A multiwavelength spectrum was
composed and the X-ray and bolometric luminosities are calculated.
[87]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.1502 [pdf] - 359849
A Giant Flare from a Soft Gamma Repeater in the Andromeda Galaxy, M31
Submitted: 2007-12-10
The light curve, energy spectra, energetics, and IPN localization of an
exceedingly intense short duration hard spectrum burst, GRB 070201, obtained
from Konus-Wind, INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), and MESSENGER data are presented. The
total fluence of the burst and the peak flux are $S = 2.00_{-0.26}^{+0.10}
\times 10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ and $F_{max} = 1.61_{-0.50}^{+0.29} \times
10^{-3}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The IPN error box has an area of 446 square
arcminutes and covers the peripheral part of the M31 galaxy. Assuming that the
source of the burst is indeed in M31 at a distance of 0.78 Mpc, the measured
values of the fluence $S$ and maximum flux $F_{max}$ correspond to a total
energy of $Q = 1.5 \times 10^{45}$ erg, and a maximum luminosity $L = 1.2
\times 10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$. These data are in good agreement with the
corresponding characteristics of the previously observed giant flares from
other soft gamma repeaters. The evidence for the identification of this event
as a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the M31 galaxy is presented.
[88]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.0473 [pdf] - 3688
Cygnus X-3 transition from the ultrasoft to the hard state
Beckmann, V.;
Soldi, S.;
Belanger, G.;
Brandt, S.;
Caballero-Garcia, M. D.;
De Cesare, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
Grebenev, S.;
Vilhu, O.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.
Submitted: 2007-08-03, last modified: 2007-08-06
Aims: The nature of Cygnus X-3 is still not understood well. This binary
system might host a black hole or a neutron star. Recent observations by
INTEGRAL have shown that Cygnus X-3 was again in an extremely ultrasoft state.
Here we present our analysis of the transition from the ultrasoft state,
dominated by blackbody radiation at soft X-rays plus non-thermal emission in
the hard X-rays, to the low hard state.
Methods: INTEGRAL observed Cyg X-3 six times during three weeks in late May
and early June 2007. Data from IBIS/ISGRI and JEM-X1 were analysed to show the
spectral transition.
Results: During the ultrasoft state, the soft X-ray spectrum is
well-described by an absorbed (NH = 1.5E22 1/cm**2) black body model, whereas
the X-ray spectrum above 20 keV appears to be extremely low and hard (Gamma =
1.7). During the transition, the radio flux rises to a level of >1 Jy, and the
soft X-ray emission drops by a factor of 3, while the hard X-ray emission rises
by a factor of 14 and becomes steeper (up to Gamma = 4).
Conclusions: The ultrasoft state apparently precedes the emission of a jet,
which is apparent in the radio and hard X-ray domain.
[89]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.3895 [pdf] - 858
SPI observations of the diffuse 60Fe emission in the Galaxy
Wang, W.;
Harris, M. J.;
Diehl, R.;
Halloin, H.;
Cordier, B.;
Strong, A. W.;
Kretschmer, K.;
Knoedlseder, J.;
Jean, P.;
Lichti, G. G.;
Roques, J. P.;
Schanne, S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
Wunderer, C.
Submitted: 2007-04-30
Gamma-ray line emission from radioactive decay of 60Fe provides constraints
on nucleosynthesis in massive stars and supernovae. The spectrometer SPI on
board INTEGRAL has accumulated nearly three years of data on gamma-ray emission
from the Galactic plane. We have analyzed these data with suitable
instrumental-background models and sky distributions to produce high-resolution
spectra of Galactic emission. We detect the gamma-ray lines from 60Fe decay at
1173 and 1333 keV, obtaining an improvement over our earlier measurement of
both lines with now 4.9 sigma significance for the combination of the two
lines. The average flux per line is (4.4 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-5} ph cm^{-2}
s^{-1} rad^{-1} for the inner Galaxy region. Deriving the Galactic 26Al
gamma-ray line flux with using the same set of observations and analysis
method, we determine the flux ratio of 60Fe/26Al gamma-rays as 0.148 \pm 0.06.
The current theoretical predictions are still consistent with our result.
[90]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.2338 [pdf] - 528
INTEGRAL and Multiwavelength Observations of the Blazar Mrk 421 during
an Active Phase
Lichti, G. G.;
Bottacini, E.;
Charlot, P.;
Collmar, W.;
Horan, D.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Laehteenmaeki, A.;
Nilsson, K.;
Petry, D.;
Sillanpaeae, A.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Weekes, T.
Submitted: 2007-04-18
A ToO observation of the TeV-emitting blazar Mrk 421 with INTEGRAL was
triggered in June 2006 by an increase of the RXTE count rate to more than 30
mCrab. The source was then observed with all INTEGRAL instruments with the
exception of the spectrometer SPI for a total exposure of 829 ks. During this
time several outbursts were observed by IBIS and JEM-X. Multiwavelength
observations were immediately triggered and the source was observed at radio,
optical and X-ray wavelengths up to TeV energies. The data obtained during
these observations are analysed with respect to spectral evolution and
correlated variability. Preliminary results of the analysis are presented in
this poster.
[91]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.2178 [pdf] - 484
High-Energy Calibration of a BGO detector of the GLAST Burst Monitor
Submitted: 2007-04-17
The understanding of the instrumental response of the GLAST Burst Monitor BGO
detectors at energies above the energy range which is accessible by common
laboratory radiation sources (< 4.43 MeV), is important, especially for the
later cross-calibration with the LAT response in the overlap region between ~
20 MeV to 30 MeV. In November 2006 the high-energy calibration of the GBM-BGO
spare detector was performed at the small Van-de-Graaff accelerator at SLAC.
High-energy gamma-rays from excited 8Be* (14.6 MeV and 17.5 MeV) and 16O* (6.1
MeV) were generated through (p,gamma)-reactions by irradiating a LiF-target.
For the calibration at lower energies radioactive sources were used. The
results, including spectra, the energy/channel-relation and the dependence of
energy resolution are presented.
[92]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.2184 [pdf] - 487
Calibration of the GLAST Burst Monitor detectors
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Lichti, Giselher G.;
Steinle, Helmut;
Krumrey, Michael;
Gerlach, Martin;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Meegan, Charles;
Bhat, Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Diehl, Roland;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Greiner, Jochen;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Paciesas, William;
Preece, Robert;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2007-04-17
The GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) will augment the capabilities of GLAST for the
detection of cosmic gamma-ray bursts by extending the energy range (20 MeV to >
300 GeV) of the Large Area Telescope (LAT) towards lower energies by 2
BGO-detectors (150 keV to 30 MeV) and 12 NaI(Tl) detectors (10 keV to 1 MeV).
The physical detector response of the GBM instrument for GRBs is determined
with the help of Monte Carlo simulations, which are supported and verified by
on-ground calibration measurements, performed extensively with the individual
detectors at the MPE in 2005. All flight and spare detectors were irradiated
with calibrated radioactive sources in the laboratory (from 14 keV to 4.43
MeV). The energy/channel-relations, the dependences of energy resolution and
effective areas on the energy and the angular responses were measured. Due to
the low number of emission lines of radioactive sources below 100 keV,
calibration measurements in the energy range from 10 keV to 60 keV were
performed with the X-ray radiometry working group of the
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) at the BESSY synchrotron radiation
facility, Berlin.
[93]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0702188 [pdf] - 89242
INTEGRAL and Magnetars
Submitted: 2007-02-07
Thanks to INTEGRAL's long exposures of the Galactic Plane, the two brightest
Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters, SGR 1806-20 and SGR 1900+14, have been monitored and
studied in detail for the first time at hard-X/soft-gamma rays. SGR 1806-20,
lying close to the Galactic Centre, and being very active in the past two
years, has provided a wealth of new INTEGRAL results, which we will summarise
here: more than 300 short bursts have been observed from this source and their
characteristics have been studied with unprecedented sensitivity in the 15-200
keV range. A hardness-intensity anticorrelation within the bursts has been
discovered and the overall Number-Intensity distribution of the bursts has been
determined. The increase of its bursting activity eventually led to the
December 2004 Giant Flare for which a possible soft gamma-ray (>80 keV) early
afterglow has been detected with INTEGRAL. The deep observations allowed us to
discover the persistent emission in hard X-rays (20-150 keV) from 1806-20 and
1900+14, the latter being in quiescent state, and to directly compare the
spectral characteristics of all Magnetars (two SGRs and three Anomalous X-ray
Pulsars) detected with INTEGRAL.
[94]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701640 [pdf] - 88769
Evidence for 1809 keV Gamma-Ray Emission from 26Al Decays in the Vela
Region with INTEGRAL/SPI
Submitted: 2007-01-23
The Vela region is a promising target for the detection of 1.8 MeV gamma-rays
emitted by the decays of radioactive 26Al isotopes produced in hydrostatic or
explosive stellar nucleosynthesis processes. COMPTEL has claimed 1.8 MeV
gamma-ray detection from Vela at a 3sigma level with a flux of 3.6 10^-5
ph/cm^2/s. In this paper, we present first results of our search for 1.8 MeV
gamma-rays from Vela with the spectrometer SPI aboard INTEGRAL. Using the data
set acquired during 1.7 Ms at the end of 2005 in the frame of our AO-3
open-time observation, we determine a flux of (6.5 \pm 1.9(stat) \pm 2.4(syst))
10^-5 ph/cm^2/s from 26Al decays in the Vela region.
[95]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701641 [pdf] - 88770
INTEGRAL Observations of the Vela Region Focusing on Vela X-1
Submitted: 2007-01-23
The Vela region has been observed for 1.7 Ms in November 2005 by the INTEGRAL
satellite. We present preliminary spectral and temporal results of Vela X-1, an
eclipsing neutron star hosted in a wind-accreting high-mass X-ray binary
system. Using data from ISGRI, SPI and JEM-X, we firmly confirm the existence
of cyclotron resonant scattering features (CRSF) at ~27 keV and ~54 keV,
implying a neutron-star magnetic field of ~3 10^12 Gauss, and the presence of
an iron emission line at ~6.5 keV. During two strong flares those parameters
remained unchanged. Furthermore we measure the neutron-star spin period of
283.6 s, indicating a still constant trend.
[96]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612437 [pdf] - 316657
IGR J08408--4503: a new recurrent Supergiant Fast X-ray Transient
Submitted: 2006-12-15
The supergiant fast X-ray transient IGR J08408-4503 was discovered by
INTEGRAL on May 15, 2006, during a bright flare. The source shows sporadic
recurrent short bright flares, reaching a peak luminosity of 10^36 erg s^-1
within less than one hour. The companion star is HD 74194, an Ob5Ib(f)
supergiant star located at 3 kpc in the Vela region. We report the light curves
and broad-band spectra (0.1-200 keV) of all the three flares of IGR J08408-4503
detected up to now based on INTEGRAL and Swift data. The flare spectra are well
described by a power-law model with a high energy cut-off at ~15 keV. The
absorption column density during the flares was found to be ~10^21 cm^-2,
indicating a very low matter density around the compact object. Using the
supergiant donor star parameters, the wind accretion conditions imply an
orbital period of the order of one year, a spin period of the order of hours
and a magnetic field of the order of 10^13 G.
[97]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0604455 [pdf] - 81524
Observations of the intense and ultra-long burst GRB041219a with the
Germanium Spectrometer on INTEGRAL
Submitted: 2006-04-21, last modified: 2006-08-23
GRB041219a is the brightest burst localised by INTEGRAL. The intense burst
occurred about ~250s after the precursor and the long delay enabled optical and
near infrared telescopes to observe the prompt emission. We present
comprehensive results of the temporal and spectral analyses, including line and
afterglow searches using the spectrometer, SPI, aboard INTEGRAL, BAT on Swift
and ASM on RXTE. We avail of multi-wavelength data to generate broadband
spectra of GRB041219a and afterglow. Spectra for the burst and sub-intervals
were fit by the Band model and also by the quasithermal model. The high
resolution Germanium spectrometer data were searched for emission and
absorption features and for gamma-ray afterglow. The overall burst and
sub-intervals are well fit by the Band model. The photon index below the break
energy shows a marked change after the quiescent time interval. In addition the
spectra are well described by a black body component with a power law. The
burst was detected by BAT and ASM during the long quiescent interval in SPI
indicating the central engine might not be dormant but that the emission occurs
in different bands. No significant emission or absorption features were found
and limits of 900 eV and 120 eV are set on the most significant features. No
gamma-ray afterglow was detected from the end of the prompt phase to ~12 hours
post-burst. Broadband spectra of the prompt emission were generated in 7 time
intervals using gamma-ray, x-ray, optical and near-infrared data and these were
compared to the high-redshift burst GRB050904. The optical and gamma-ray
emission are correlated in GRB041219a. The spectral lag was determined using
data from the BAT and it changes throughout the burst. A number of
pseudo-redshifts were evaluated and large dispersion in values was found.
[98]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601015 [pdf] - 354151
Radioactive 26Al and massive stars in the Galaxy
Diehl, Roland;
Halloin, Hubert;
Kretschmer, Karsten;
Lichti, Giselher G.;
Schoenfelder, Volker;
Strong, Andrew W.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Wang, Wei;
Jean, Pierre;
Knoedlseder, Juergen;
Roques, Jean-Pierre;
Weidenspointner, Georg;
Schanne, Stephane;
Hartmann, Dieter H.;
Winkler, Christoph;
Wunderer, Cornelia
Submitted: 2006-01-01, last modified: 2006-01-04
Gamma-rays from radioactive 26Al (half life ~7.2 10^5 yr) provide a
'snapshot' view of ongoing nucleosynthesis in the Galaxy. The Galaxy is
relatively transparent to such gamma-rays, and emission has been found
concentrated along the plane of the Galaxy. This led to the conclusion1 that
massive stars throughout the Galaxy dominate the production of 26Al. On the
other hand, meteoritic data show locally-produced 26Al, perhaps from spallation
reactions in the protosolar disk. Furthermore, prominent gamma-ray emission
from the Cygnus region suggests that a substantial fraction of Galactic 26Al
could originate in localized star-forming regions. Here we report high spectral
resolution measurements of 26Al emission at 1808.65 keV, which demonstrate that
the 26Al source regions corotate with the Galaxy, supporting its Galaxy-wide
origin. We determine a present-day equilibrium mass of 2.8 (+/-0.8) M_sol of
26Al. We use this to estimate that the frequency of core collapse (i.e. type
Ib/c and type II) supernovae to be 1.9(+/- 1.1) events per century.
[99]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512334 [pdf] - 78534
26Al in the inner Galaxy
Diehl, R.;
Halloin, H.;
Kretschmer, K.;
Strong, A. W.;
Wang, W.;
Jean, P.;
Lichti, G. G.;
Knoedlseder, J.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Schanne, S.;
Schoenfelder, V.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
Winkler, C.;
Wunderer, C.
Submitted: 2005-12-13
We performed a spectroscopic study of the 1809 keV gamma-ray line from 26Al
decay in the Galaxy using the SPI imaging spectrometer with its high-resolution
Ge detector camera on the INTEGRAL observatory. We analyzed observations of the
first two mission years, fitting spectra from all 7130 telescope pointings in
narrow energy bins to models of instrumental background and the 26Al sky.
Instrumental background is estimated from independent tracers of cosmic-ray
activation. The shape of the 26Al signal is compared to the instrumental
response to extract the width of the celestial line. We detect the 26Al line at
\~16sigma significance. The line is broadened only slightly, if at all; we
constrain the width to be below 2.8 keV (FWHM, 2 sigma). The average Doppler
velocities of 26Al at the time of its decay in the interstellar medium (decay
time~1.04 My) therefore are probably around 100 km/s, in agreement with
expectations from Galactic rotation and interstellar turbulence. The flux and
spatial distribution of the emission are found consistent with previous
observations. The derived amount of 26Al in the Galaxy is 2.8 (+/-0.8) M_solar.
[100]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0508615 [pdf] - 75504
Two years of INTEGRAL monitoring of the Soft Gamma-Ray Repeater SGR
1806-20: from quiescence to frenzy
Gotz, D.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Molkov, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Mirabel, I. F.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
Brandt, S.;
Del Santo, M.;
Feroci, M.;
Gogus, E.;
von Kienlin, A.;
van der Klis, M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Lund, N.;
Pizzichini, G.;
Ubertini, P.;
Winkler, C.;
Woods, P. M.
Submitted: 2005-08-29
SGR 1806-20 has been observed for more than 2 years with the INTEGRAL
satellite. In this period the source went from a quiescent state into a very
active one culminating in a giant flare on December 27 2004. Here we report on
the properties of all the short bursts detected with INTEGRAL before the giant
flare. We derive their number-intensity distribution and confirm the
hardness-intensity correlation for the bursts found by Gotz et al. (2004a). Our
sample includes a very bright outburst that occurred on October 5 2004, during
which over one hundred bursts were emitted in 10 minutes, involving an energy
release of 3 x 1E42 erg. We present a detailed analysis of it and discuss our
results in the framework of the magnetar model.
[101]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0505349 [pdf] - 260606
INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton observations of the low-luminosity and X-ray
rich burst GRB 040223
Submitted: 2005-05-17, last modified: 2005-08-28
GRB 040223 was observed by INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton. GRB 040223 has a peak
flux of (1.6+/-0.13) x10^-8 ergs cm^-2 s^-1, a fluence of (4.4+/-0.4)x10^-7
ergs cm^-2 and a steep photon power law index of -2.3+/-0.2, in the energy
range 20-200 keV. The steep spectrum implies it is an x- ray rich GRB with
emission up to 200 keV and E_peak < 20 keV. If E_peak is < 10 keV, it would
qualify as an x-ray flash with high energy emission. The x-ray data has a
spectral index beta_x = -1.7+/-0.2, a temporal decay of t^(-0.75+/-0.25) and a
large column density of (1.8 x 10^22) cm^-2. The luminosity-lag relationship
was used to obtain a redshift (z = 0.1+0.04-0.02). The isotropic energy
radiated in gamma-rays and x-ray luminosity after 10 hours are factors of 1000
and 100 less than classical GRBs. GRB 040223 is consistent with the
extrapolation of the Amati relation into the region that includes XRF 030723
and XRF 020903.
[102]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502329 [pdf] - 71120
An exceptionally bright flare from SGR1806-20 and the origins of
short-duration gamma-ray bursts
Hurley, K.;
Boggs, S. E.;
Smith, D. M.;
Duncan, R. C.;
Lin, R.;
Zoglauer, A.;
Krucker, S.;
Hurford, G.;
Hudson, H.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Thompson, C.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Lichti, G.;
Rau, A.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2005-02-16, last modified: 2005-05-11
Soft-gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are galactic X-ray stars that emit numerous
short-duration (about 0.1 s) bursts of hard X-rays during sporadic active
periods. They are thought to be magnetars: strongly magnetized neutron stars
with emissions powered by the dissipation of magnetic energy. Here we report
the detection of a long (380 s) giant flare from SGR 1806-20, which was much
more luminous than any previous transient event observed in our Galaxy. (In the
first 0.2 s, the flare released as much energy as the Sun radiates in a quarter
of a million years.) Its power can be explained by a catastrophic instability
involving global crust failure and magnetic reconnection on a magnetar, with
possible large-scale untwisting of magnetic field lines outside the star. From
a great distance this event would appear to be a short-duration, hard-spectrum
cosmic gamma-ray burst. At least a significant fraction of the mysterious
short-duration gamma-ray bursts therefore may come from extragalactic
magnetars.
[103]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502577 [pdf] - 71368
The first giant flare from SGR 1806-20: observations with the INTEGRAL
SPI Anti-Coincidence Shield
Submitted: 2005-02-28, last modified: 2005-04-04
A giant flare from the Soft Gamma-ray Repeater SGR 1806-20 has been detected
by several satellites on 2004 December 27. This tremendous outburst, the first
one observed from this source, was a hundred times more powerful than the two
previous giant flares from SGR 0525-66 and SGR 1900+14. We report the results
obtained for this event with the Anticoincidence Shield of the SPI spectrometer
on board the INTEGRAL satellite, which provides a high-statistics light curve
at E>~80 keV. The flare started with a very strong pulse, which saturated the
detector for ~0.7 s, and whose backscattered radiation from the Moon was
detected 2.8 s later. This was followed by a ~400 s long tail modulated at the
neutron star rotation period of 7.56 s. The tail fluence corresponds to an
energy in photons above 3 keV of 1.6x10^44 (d/15 kpc)^2 erg. This is of the
same order of the energy emitted in the pulsating tails of the two giant flares
seen from other soft repeaters, despite the hundredfold larger overall emitted
energy of the SGR 1806-20 giant flare. Long lasting (~1 hour) hard X-ray
emission, decaying in time as t^-0.85, and likely associated to the SGR 1806-20
giant flare afterglow has also been detected.
[104]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0411565 [pdf] - 69164
INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton Observations of GRB040106
Moran, L.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Gotz, D.;
Hanlon, L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, B.;
Tiengo, A.;
Preece, R.;
Williams, O. R.;
Bennett, K.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
McGlynn, S.
Submitted: 2004-11-19
On January 6th 2004, the IBAS burst alert system triggered the 8th gamma-ray
burst (GRB) to be located by the INTEGRAL satellite. The position was
determined and publicly distributed within 12s, prompting ESA's XMM-Newton to
execute a ToO observation just 5 hours later, during which an X-ray afterglow
was detected. The GRB had a duration ~52s with two distinct pulses separated by
\~42s. Here we present the results of imaging and spectral analyses of the
prompt emission from INTEGRAL data and the X-ray afterglow from XMM-Newton
data. The gamma-ray spectrum is consistent with a single power-law of photon
index -1.72 +/- 0.15. The fluence (20-200 keV) was 8.2 x 10^-7 erg cm^-2. The
X-ray afterglow (F_nu (t) propto nu^-beta_X t^-delta) was extremely hard with
beta_X = 0.47 +/- 0.01 and delta = 1.46 +/- 0.04. The 2-10 keV flux 11 hours
after the burst was 1.1 x 10^-12 erg cm^-2 s^-1. The time profile of the GRB is
consistent with the observed trends from previous analysis of BATSE GRBs. We
find that the X-ray data are not well-fit by either a simple spherical fireball
or by a speading jet, expanding into a homogeneous medium or a wind
environment. Based on previously determined correlations between GRB spectra
and redshift, we estimate a redshift of ~0.9^+0.5_-0.4 (1 sigma) and a lower
limit on the isotropic radiated energy of ~5 x 10^51 erg in this burst.
[105]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407137 [pdf] - 65979
Measurements of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) with Glast
Lichti, G. G.;
Briggs, M.;
Diehl, R.;
Fishman, G.;
Greiner, J.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Paciesas, W.;
Preece, R.;
Schoenfelder, V.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2004-07-07
One of the scientific goals of the main instrument of GLAST is the study of
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) in the energy range from ~20 MeV to ~300 GeV. In order
to extend the energy measurement towards lower energies a secondary instrument,
the GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM), will measure GRBs from ~10 keV to ~25 MeV and
will therefore allow the investigation of the relation between the keV and the
MeV-GeV emission from GRBs over six energy decades. These unprecedented
measurements will permit the exploration of the unknown aspects of the
high-energy burst emission and the investigation of their connection with the
well-studied low-energy emission. They will also provide ne insights into the
physics of GRBs in general. In addition the excellent localization of GRBs by
the LAT will stimulate follow-up observations at other wavelengths which may
yield clues about the nature of the burst sources.
[106]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407144 [pdf] - 65986
The GLAST Burst Monitor
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Lichti, Giselher G.;
Bhat, Narayana P.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Hoover, Andrew S.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
Schoenfelder, Volker;
Steinle, Helmut;
Wilson, Robert B.
Submitted: 2004-07-07
The next large NASA mission in the field of gamma-ray astronomy, GLAST, is
scheduled for launch in 2007. Aside from the main instrument LAT (Large-Area
Telescope), a gamma-ray telescope for the energy range between 20 MeV and > 100
GeV, a secondary instrument, the GLAST burst monitor (GBM), is foreseen. With
this monitor one of the key scientific objectives of the mission, the
determination of the high-energy behaviour of gamma-ray bursts and transients
can be ensured. Its task is to increase the detection rate of gamma-ray bursts
for the LAT and to extend the energy range to lower energies (from ~10 keV to
\~30 MeV). It will provide real-time burst locations over a wide FoV with
sufficient accuracy to allow repointing the GLAST spacecraft. Time-resolved
spectra of many bursts recorded with LAT and the burst monitor will allow the
investigation of the relation between the keV and the MeV-GeV emission from
GRBs over unprecedented seven decades of energy. This will help to advance our
understanding of the mechanisms by which gamma-rays are generated in gamma-ray
bursts.
[107]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407129 [pdf] - 65971
Search for 44Ti gamma-ray line emission from GRO J0852-4642 with
INTEGRAL/SPI
von Kienlin, A.;
Attie, D.;
Schanne, S.;
Cordier, B.;
Diehl, R.;
Iyudin, A. F.;
Lichti, G. G.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Schoenfelder, V.;
Strong, A.
Submitted: 2004-07-07
The gamma-ray source GRO J0852-4642, discovered by COMPTEL, is a possible
counterpart of the supernova remnant RX J0852-4622. Detection of radioactive
decay from 44Ti nuclei would proof it to be the youngest and nearest supernova
remnant known so far. During the first year of INTEGRAL core program, the Vela
region was observed twice in all for more than 2000 ks. Among other
nucleosynthesis studies, one of the most important scientific goals of this
observation is the detection of 44Ti gamma-ray lines expected at 68 keV, 78 keV
and 1157 keV. For this purpose the INTEGRAL Spectrometer (SPI), with its very
high energy resolution thanks to its germanium detector camera is the key
instrument, permitting a precise determination of gamma-ray line intensities
and profiles. The upper limit for the 78.4 keV 44Ti gamma-ray line emission
derived from the first analysis is 1.1 x 10^{-4} gamma/cm2s. This value is
mainly dominated by systematic uncertainties in the treatment of the
instrumental background. By accumulating more observation time in the next
years of the mission and by improving the background understanding, a reliable
44Ti flux for GRO J0852-4642 or an upper limit which constrains the COMPTEL
flux can be expected.
[108]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407126 [pdf] - 65968
Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed with the Spectrometer SPI Onboard INTEGRAL
Submitted: 2004-07-07
The spectrometer SPI is one of the main detectors of ESA's INTEGRAL mission.
The instrument offers two interesting and valuable capabilities for the
detection of the prompt emission of Gamma-ray bursts. Within a field of view of
16 degrees, SPI is able to localize Gamma-ray bursts with an accuracy of 10
arcmin. The large anticoincidence shield, ACS, consisting of 512 kg of BGO
crystals, detects Gamma-ray bursts quasi omnidirectionally above ~70 keV. Burst
alerts from SPI/ACS are distributed to the interested community via the
INTEGRAL Burst Alert System. The ACS data have been implemented into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network and have proven valuable for the localization of bursts
using the triangulation method. During the first 8 months of the mission
approximately one Gamma-ray burst per month was localized within the field of
fiew of SPI and 145 Gamma-ray burst candidates were detected by the ACS from
which 40 % have been confirmed by other instruments.
[109]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407082 [pdf] - 65924
Gamma-Ray Burst Detection with INTEGRAL/SPI
Submitted: 2004-07-05
The spectrometer SPI, one of the two main instruments of the INTEGRAL
spacecraft, has strong capabilities in the field of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB)
detections. In its 16 deg field of view (FoV) SPI is able to trigger and to
localize GRBs with an accuracy for strong bursts better than 1 deg. The
expected GRB detection rate is about one per month.
[110]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0404019 [pdf] - 63927
The INTEGRAL Burst Alert System: Results and Future Perspectives
Submitted: 2004-04-01, last modified: 2004-05-31
The INTEGRAL Burst Alert System (IBAS) is the software for real time
detection of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) and the rapid distribution of their
coordinates. IBAS has been running almost continuously at the INTEGRAL Science
Data Center since the beginning of the INTEGRAL mission, yielding up to now
accurate localizations for 12 GRBs detected in the IBIS field of view. IBAS is
able to provide error regions with radius as small as 3 arcminutes (90% c.l.)
within a few tens of seconds of the GRB start. We present the current status of
IBAS, review the results obtained for the GRBs localized so far, and briefly
discuss future prospects for using the IBAS real time information on other
classes of variable sources.
[111]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0405192 [pdf] - 64712
Al(26) Studies with INTEGRAL's Spectrometer SPI
Diehl, R.;
Kretschmer, K.;
Lichti, G.;
Schönfelder, V.;
Strong, A. W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Jean, P.;
Lonjou, V.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Vedrenne, G.;
Schanne, S.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Winkler, C.;
Wunderer, C.
Submitted: 2004-05-11
Al(26) radioactivity traces recent nucleosynthesis throughout the Galaxy, and
is known to be produced in massive stars and novae. The map from its decay
gamma-ray line suggests massive stars to dominate, but high-resolution line
spectroscopy is expected to supplement imaging of Al(26) source regions and
thus to help decide about the Al(26) injection process and interstellar
environment, hence about the specific massive-star subgroup and phase which
produces interstellar Al(26). The INTEGRAL Spectrometer SPI has observed
Galactic Al(26) radioactivity in its 1809 keV gamma-ray line during its first
inner-Galaxy survey. Instrumental background lines make analysis difficult;
yet, a clear signal from the inner Galaxy agrees with expectations. In
particular, SPI has constrained the line width to exclude previously-reported
line broadenings corresponding to velocities >500 km/s. The
signal-to-background ratio of percent implies that detector response and
background modeling need to be fine-tuned to eventually enable line shape
deconvolution in order to extract source location information along the line of
sight.
[112]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0405135 [pdf] - 64655
The INTEGRAL view of the Soft Gamma-ray Repeater SGR 1806-20
Gotz, D.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Mirabel, I. F.;
Hurley, K.;
Brandt, S.;
Lund, N.;
Ubertini, P.;
Del Santo, M.;
Costa, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Gimenez, A.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Boer, M.;
Cline, T.;
Frontera, F.;
Pizzichini, G.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Gougus, E.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Finger, M.;
Thompson, C.;
Pedersen, H.;
van der Klis, M.
Submitted: 2004-05-07
We present the results obtained by INTEGRAL on the Soft-Gamma Ray Repeater
SGR 1806-20. In particular we report on the temporal and spectral properties of
the bursts detected during a moderately active period of the source in
September and October 2003 and on the search for quiescent emission.
[113]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0405121 [pdf] - 260557
The Sample of Gamma-ray Bursts Observed With SPI-ACS
Submitted: 2004-05-06
The SPI anticoincidence shield consists of 91 BGO crystals and is operated as
a nearly omnidirectional gamma-ray burst detector above ~75 keV. Since the
start of the mission 269 gamma-ray burst candidates have been detected. 110
bursts have been confirmed with the instruments included in the 3rd
Interplanetary Network. Here we present a preliminary statistical analysis of
the SPI-ACS sample of gamma-ray bursts and gamma-ray burst candidates; in
particular we discuss the duration distribution of the bursts. A prominent
population of short burst candidates (duration <200ms) is found which is
discovered to be strongly contaminated by cosmic-ray nuclei interacting in the
detectors.
[114]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0404126 [pdf] - 64034
Preliminary INTEGRAL Analysis of GRB040106
Moran, L.;
Hanlon, L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, B.;
McBreen, S.;
McGlynn, S.;
French, J.;
Preece, R.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Williams, O. R.;
Bennett, K.;
Kippen, R. Marc
Submitted: 2004-04-06, last modified: 2004-04-13
On January 6th 2004, the IBAS burst alert system triggered the 8th gamma-ray
burst (GRB) to be detected by the INTEGRAL satellite. The position was
determined and publicly distributed within 12s, enabling ESA's XMM-Newton to
take advantage of a ToO observation just 5 hours later during which the x-ray
afterglow was detected. Observations at optical wavelengths also revealed the
existence of a fading optical source. The GRB is ~52s long with 2 distinct
peaks separated by ~24s. At gamma-ray energies the burst was the weakest
detected by INTEGRAL up to that time with a flux in the 20-200 keV band of 0.57
photons/cm^2/s. Nevertheless, it was possible to determine its position and
extract spectra and fluxes. Here we present light curves and the results of
imaging, spectral and temporal analyses of the prompt emission and the onset of
the afterglow from INTEGRAL data.
[115]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0404027 [pdf] - 63935
Search for gamma-ray line emission from the radioactive decay of 60Fe
with SPI
Knodlseder, J.;
Cisana, E.;
Diehl, R.;
Lichti, G.;
Harris, M.;
Jean, P.;
Kretschmer, K.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Schanne, S.;
Schonfelder, V.;
Vedrenne, G.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
Wunderer, C.
Submitted: 2004-04-01
The search for gamma-ray line emission from the radioactive decay of 60Fe
figures among the prime scientific objectives of the INTEGRAL mission. 60Fe is
believed to be primarily produced in core-collapse supernovae, although other
sites, such as carbon deflagration supernovae or intermediate mass AGB stars
have also been suggested. We present first results of our search for the 1173
and 1332 keV gamma-ray lines of 60Fe decay in the SPI data of the first mission
year. So far we can only report upper flux limits whose levels are determined
by systematic uncertainties in the treatment of the instrumental background.
Once we understand the background uncertainties better, the SPI data should
provide stringent constraints on 60Fe nucleosynthesis in our Galaxy.
[116]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0401291 [pdf] - 62161
INTEGRAL Spectrometer Analysis of GRB030227 & GRB030131
Moran, L.;
Hanlon, L.;
McBreen, B.;
Preece, R.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Williams, O. R.;
Bennett, K.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Von Kienlin, A.;
Beckmann, V.;
McBreen, S.;
French, J.
Submitted: 2004-01-15
The spectrometer SPI on board INTEGRAL is capable of high-resolution
spectroscopic studies in the energy range 20keV to 8MeV for GRBs which occur
within the fully coded field of view (16 degrees corner to corner). Six GRBs
occurred within the SPI field of view between October 2002 and November 2003.
We present results of the analysis of the first two GRBs detected by SPI after
the payload performance and verification phase of INTEGRAL.
[117]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310793 [pdf] - 60456
SPI/INTEGRAL in-flight performance
Roques, J. -P.;
Schanne, S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Briet, R.;
Bouchet, L.;
Paul, Ph.;
Boggs, S.;
Caraveo, P.;
Cassé, M.;
Cordier, B.;
Diehl, R.;
Durouchoux, P.;
Jean, P.;
Leleux, P.;
Lichti, G.;
Mandrou, P.;
Matteson, J.;
Sanchez, F.;
Schönfelder, V.;
Skinner, G.;
Strong, A.;
Teegarden, B.;
Vedrenne, G.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Wunderer, C.
Submitted: 2003-10-28
The SPI instrument has been launched on-board the INTEGRAL observatory on
October 17, 2002. SPI is a spectrometer devoted to the sky observation in the
20 keV-8 MeV energy range using 19 germanium detectors. The performance of the
cryogenic system is nominal and allows to cool the 19 kg of germanium down to
85 K with a comfortable margin. The energy resolution of the whole camera is
2.5 keV at 1.1 MeV. This resolution degrades with time due to particle
irradiation in space. We show that the annealing process allows the recovery of
the initial performance. The anticoincidence shield works as expected, with a
low threshold at 75 keV, reducing the GeD background by a factor of 20. The
digital front-end electronics system allows the perfect alignement in time of
all the signals as well as the optimisation of the dead time (12%). We
demonstrate that SPI is able to map regions as complex as the galactic plane.
The obtained spectrum of the Crab nebula validates the present version of our
response matrix. The 3 $\sigma$ sensitivity of the instrument at 1 MeV is 8
10$^{-7}$ph$\cdot$cm$^{-2}\cdot$s$^{-1}\cdot$keV$^{-1}$ for the continuum and 3
10$^{-5}$ph$\cdot$cm$^{-2}\cdot$s$^{-1}$ for narrow lines.
[118]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310423 [pdf] - 60086
SPI/INTEGRAL observation of the Cygnus region
Bouchet, L.;
Jourdain, E.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Mandrou, P.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Boggs, S.;
Caraveo, P.;
Cassé, M.;
Cordier, B.;
Diehl, R.;
Durouchoux, P.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Jean, P.;
Leleux, P.;
Lichti, G.;
Matteson, J.;
Sanchez, F.;
Schanne, S.;
Schönfelder, V.;
Skinner, G.;
Strong, A.;
Teegarden, B.;
Vedrenne, G.;
Wunderer, C.
Submitted: 2003-10-15
We present the analysis of the first observations of the Cygnus region by the
SPI spectrometer onboard the Integral Gamma Ray Observatory, encompassing
${\sim}$ 600 ks of data. Three sources namely Cyg X-1, Cyg X-3 and EXO 2030+375
were clearly detected. Our data illustrate the temporal variability of Cyg X-1
in the energy range from 20 keV to 300 keV. The spectral analysis shows a
remarkable stability of the Cyg X-1 spectra when averaged over one day
timescale. The other goal of these observations is SPI inflight calibration and
performance verification. The latest objective has been achieved as
demonstrated by the results presented in this paper.
[119]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0309097 [pdf] - 58924
SPI Measurements of Galactic 26Al
Diehl, R.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Lichti, G.;
Kretschmer, K.;
Schanne, S.;
Schönfelder, V.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
Winkler, C.;
Wunderer, C.
Submitted: 2003-09-03
The precision measurement of the 1809 keV gamma-ray line from Galactic
$^{26}$Al is one of the goals of the SPI spectrometer on INTEGRAL with its Ge
detector camera. We aim for determination of the detailed shape of this
gamma-ray line, and its variation for different source regions along the plane
of the Galaxy. Data from the first part of the core program observations of the
first mission year have been inspected. A clear detection of the \Al line at
about 5--7 $\sigma$ significance demonstrates that SPI will deepen \Al studies.
The line intensity is consistent with expectations from previous experiments,
and the line appears narrower than the 5.4 keV FWHM reported by GRIS, more
consistent with RHESSI's recent value. Only preliminary statements can be made
at this time, however, due to the multi-component background underlying the
signal at \about 40 times higher intensity than the signal from Galactic
$^{26}$Al.
[120]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308504 [pdf] - 58783
INTEGRAL/SPI ground calibration
Attié, D.;
Cordier, B.;
Gros, M.;
Laurent, Ph.;
Schanne, S.;
Tauzin, G.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Bouchet, L.;
Jean, P.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Mandrou, P.;
Paul, Ph.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Skinner, G.;
Vedrenne, G.;
Georgii, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Lichti, G.;
Schönfelder, V.;
Strong, A.;
Wunderer, C.;
Shrader, C.;
Sturner, S.;
Teegarden, B.;
Weidenspointner, G.;
Kiener, J.;
Porquet, M. -G.;
Tatischeff, V.;
Crespin, S.;
Joly, S.;
André, Y.;
Sanchez, F.;
Leleux, P.
Submitted: 2003-08-28
Three calibration campaigns of the spectrometer SPI have been performed
before launch in order to determine the instrument characteristics, such as the
effective detection area, the spectral resolution and the angular resolution.
Absolute determination of the effective area has been obtained from simulations
and measurements. At 1 MeV, the effective area is 65 cm^2 for a point source on
the optical axis, the spectral resolution ~2.3 keV. The angular resolution is
better than 2.5 deg and the source separation capability about 1 deg. Some
temperature dependant parameters will require permanent in-flight calibration.
[121]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308457 [pdf] - 58736
GRB 021219: the first Gamma-Ray Burst localized in real time with IBAS
Submitted: 2003-08-26
On December 19, 2002, during the Performance and Verification Phase of
INTEGRAL, a Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) has been detected and localized in real time
with the INTEGRAL Burst Alert System (IBAS). Here we present the results
obtained with the IBIS and SPI instruments. The burst had a time profile with a
single peak lasting about 6 s. The peak spectrum can be described by a single
power law with photon index $\Gamma$=1.6$\pm$0.1 and flux $\sim$3.7 photons
cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (20 - 200 keV). The fluence in the same energy range is
9$\times10^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$. Time resolved spectroscopy performed with
IBIS/ISGRI shows a clear hard to soft evolution of the spectrum.
[122]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308346 [pdf] - 58625
INTEGRAL Spectrometer SPI's GRB detection capabilities. GRBs detected
inside SPI's FoV and with the anticoincidence system ACS
von Kienlin, A.;
Beckmann, V.;
Rau, A.;
Arend, N.;
Bennett, K.;
McBreen, B.;
Connell, P.;
Deluit, S.;
Hanlon, L.;
Kippen, M.;
Lichti, G. G.;
Moran, L.;
Preece, R.;
Roques, J. -P.;
Schoenfelder, V.;
Skinner, G.;
Strong, A.;
Williams, R.
Submitted: 2003-08-20
The spectrometer SPI, one of the two main instruments of the INTEGRAL
spacecraft, offers significant gamma-ray burst detection capabilities. In its
35 deg (full width) field of view SPI is able to localise gamma-ray bursts at a
mean rate of ~ 0.8/month. With its large anticoincidence shield of 512 kg of
BGO crystals SPI is able to detect gamma-ray bursts quasi omni-directionally
with a very high sensitivity. Burst alerts of the anticoincidence shield are
distributed by the INTEGRAL Burst Alert System. In the first 8 months of the
mission about 0.8/day gamma-ray burst candidates and 0.3/day gamma-ray burst
positions were obtained with the anticoincidence shield by interplanetary
network triangulations with other spacecrafts.
[123]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308349 [pdf] - 58628
Integral results on GRB030320: a long gamma-ray burst detected at the
edge of the field of view
von Kienlin, A.;
Beckmann, V.;
Covino, S.;
Goetz, D.;
Lichti, G. G.;
Malesani, D.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Molinari, E.;
Rau, A.;
Shrader, C. R.;
Sturner, S. J.;
Zerbi, F.
Submitted: 2003-08-20
GRB030320 is the 5th Gamma-ray burst (GRB) detected by INTEGRAL in the field
of view (FoV). It is so far the GRB with the largest off-axis angle with
respect to the INTEGRAL pointing direction, near to the edge of the FoV of both
main instruments, IBIS and SPI. Nevertheless, it was possible to determine its
position and to extract spectra and fluxes. The GRB nature of the event was
confirmed by an IPN triangulation. It is a ~ 60 s long GRB with two prominent
peaks separated by ~ 35 s. The spectral shape of the GRB is best represented by
a single power law with a photon index Gamma ~ 1.7. The peak flux in the 20 -
200 keV band is determined to ~ 5.7 photons cm-2 s-1 and the GRB fluence to 1.1
x 10-5 erg cm-2. Analysing the spectral evolution of the GRB, a
``hard-to-soft'' behaviour emerges. A search for an optical counterpart has
been carried out, but none was found.
[124]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307523 [pdf] - 58236
GRB021125: the first GRB imaged by INTEGRAL
Malaguti, G.;
Bazzano, A.;
Beckmann, V.;
Bird, A. J.;
Del Santo, M.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Foschini, L.;
Goldoni, P.;
Gotz, D.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Paizis, A.;
Segreto, A.;
Skinner, G.;
Ubertini, P.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2003-07-30
In the late afternoon of November 25, 2002 a gamma-ray burst (GRB) was
detected in the partially coded field of view (about 7.3 deg from the centre)
of the imager IBIS on board the INTEGRAL satellite. The instruments on-board
INTEGRAL allowed, for the first time, the observation of the prompt gamma-ray
emission over a broad energy band from 15 to 500 keV. GRB021125 lasted ~24 s
with a mean flux of ~5.0 photons/cm^2/s in the 20-500 keV energy band, and a
fluence of 4.8x10^-5 erg/cm^2 in the same energy band. Here we report the
analysis of the data from the imager IBIS and the spectrometer SPI.
[125]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0304477 [pdf] - 56385
INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton observations of the weak GRB 030227
Mereghetti, S.;
Gotz, D.;
Tiengo, A.;
Beckmann, V.;
Borkowski, J.;
Courvoisier, T. J. -L.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Schoenfelder, V.;
Roques, J. P.;
Bouchet, L.;
Ubertini, P.;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Lebrun, F.;
Paul, J.;
Lund, N.;
Hesse, M. Mas;
Hermsen, W.;
Hartog, P. den;
Winkler, C.
Submitted: 2003-04-26
We present INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton observations of the prompt gamma-ray
emission and the X-ray afterglow of GRB030227, the first GRB for which the
quick localization obtained with the INTEGRAL Burst Alert System (IBAS) has led
to the discovery of X-ray and optical afterglows. GRB030227 had a duration of
about 20 s and a peak flux of 1.1 photons cm^-2 s^-1 in the 20-200 keV energy
range. The time averaged spectrum can be fit by a single power law with photon
index about 2 and we find some evidence for a hard to soft spectral evolution.
The X-ray afterglow has been detected starting only 8 hours after the prompt
emission, with a 0.2-10 keV flux decreasing as t^-1 from 1.3x10e-12 to 5x10e-13
erg cm^-2 s^-1. The afterglow spectrum is well described by a power law with
photon index 1.94+/-0.05 modified by a redshifted neutral absorber with column
density of several 10e22 cm^-2. A possible emission line at 1.67 keV could be
due to Fe for a redshift z=3, consistent with the value inferred from the
absorption.
[126]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302139 [pdf] - 54766
Gamma-Ray Burst Detection with INTEGRAL/SPI
Submitted: 2003-02-07
The spectrometer SPI, one of the two main instruments of the INTEGRAL
spacecraft, has strong capabilities in the Field of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB)
detections. In its 16 degree Field of view (FoV) SPI is able to trigger and to
localize GRBs. With its large anticoincidence shield (ACS) of 512 kg of BGO
crystals SPI is able to detect GRBs quasi omnidirectionally with a very high
sensitivity. The ACS GRB alerts will provide GRB arrival times with high
accuracy but with no or very rough positional information. The expected GRB
detection rate in SPI's FoV will be one per month and for the ACS around 300
per year. At MPE two SPI software contributions to the real-time INTEGRAL
burst-alert system (IBAS) at the INTEGRAL science data centre ISDC have been
developed. The SPI-ACS branch of IBAS will produce burst alerts and
light-curves with 50 ms resolution. It is planned to use ACS burst alerts in
the 3rd interplanetary network. The SPI-FoV branch of IBAS is currently under
development at MPE. The system is using the energy and timing information of
single and multiple events detected by the Germanium-camera of SPI. Using the
imaging algorithm developed at the University of Birmingham the system is
expected to locate strong bursts with an accuracy of better than 1 degree.
[127]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0109144 [pdf] - 44643
The GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM)
Lichti, G. G.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Diehl, R.;
Fishman, G.;
Georgii, R.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Paciesas, W.;
Preece, R.;
Schoenfelder, V.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2001-09-10
The selection of the GLAST burst monitor (GBM) by NASA will allow the
investigation of the relation between the keV and the MeV-GeV emission from
gamma-ray bursts. The GBM consists of 12 NaI and 2 BGO crystals allowing a
continuous measurement of the energy spectra of gamma-ray bursts from ~5 keV to
\~30 MeV. One feature of the GBM is its high time resolution for time-resolved
gamma-ray spectroscopy. Moreover the arrangement of the NaI crystals allows a
rapid on-board location (<15 degrees) of a gamma-ray burst within a FoV of ~8.6
sr. This position will be communicated to the main instrument of GLAST making
follow-up observations at high energies possible.
[128]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0109119 [pdf] - 44618
A GRB Detection System using the BGO-Shield of the INTEGRAL-Spectrometer
SPI
Submitted: 2001-09-07
The anticoincidence shield (ACS) of the INTEGRAL-spectrometer SPI consists of
512 kg of BGO crystals. This massive scintillator allows the measurement of
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with a very high sensitivity. Estimations have shown
that with the ACS some hundred gamma-ray bursts per year on the 5 sigma level
can be detected, having an equivalent sensitivity to BATSE. The GRB detection
will be part of the real-time INTEGRAL burst-alert system (IBAS). The ACS
branch of IBAS will produce burst alerts and light curves with 50 ms
resolution. It is planned to use ACS burst alerts in the 4th interplanetary
network (IPN).
