Normalized to: Vogler, H.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.06901 [pdf] - 1574689
Swift monitoring of NGC 4151: Evidence for a Second X-ray/UV
Reprocessing
Edelson, R.;
Gelbord, J.;
Cackett, E.;
Connolly, S.;
Done, C.;
Fausnaugh, M.;
Gardner, E.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goad, M.;
Horne, K.;
McHardy, I.;
Peterson, B. M.;
Vaughan, S.;
Vestergaard, M.;
Breeveld, A.;
Barth, A. J.;
Bentz, M.;
Bottorff, M.;
Brandt, W. N.;
Crawford, S. M.;
Bonta, E. Dalla;
Emmanoulopoulos, D.;
Evans, P.;
Jaimes, R. Figuera;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Ferland, G.;
Grupe, D.;
Joner, M.;
Kennea, J.;
Korista, K. T.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Kriss, G.;
Leonard, D. C.;
Mathur, S.;
Netzer, H.;
Nousek, J.;
Page, K.;
Romero-Colmenero, E.;
Siegel, M.;
Starkey, D. A.;
Treu, T.;
Vogler, H. A.;
Winkler, H.;
Zheng, W.
Submitted: 2017-03-20, last modified: 2017-04-04
Swift monitoring of NGC 4151 with ~6 hr sampling over a total of 69 days in
early 2016 is used to construct light curves covering five bands in the X-rays
(0.3-50 keV) and six in the ultraviolet (UV)/optical (1900-5500 A). The three
hardest X-ray bands (>2.5 keV) are all strongly correlated with no measurable
interband lag while the two softer bands show lower variability and weaker
correlations. The UV/optical bands are significantly correlated with the
X-rays, lagging ~3-4 days behind the hard X-rays. The variability within the
UV/optical bands is also strongly correlated, with the UV appearing to lead the
optical by ~0.5-1 day. This combination of >~3 day lags between the X-rays and
UV and <~1 day lags within the UV/optical appears to rule out the "lamp-post"
reprocessing model in which a hot, X-ray emitting corona directly illuminates
the accretion disk, which then reprocesses the energy in the UV/optical.
Instead, these results appear consistent with the Gardner & Done picture in
which two separate reprocessings occur: first, emission from the corona
illuminates an extreme-UV-emitting toroidal component that shields the disk
from the corona; this then heats the extreme-UV component which illuminates the
disk and drives its variability.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.09438 [pdf] - 1580721
Discovery and Follow-up Observations of the Young Type Ia Supernova
2016coj
Zheng, WeiKang;
Filippenko, Alexei V.;
Mauerhan, Jon;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Yuk, Heechan;
Hosseinzadeh, Griffin;
Silverman, Jeffrey M.;
Rui, Liming;
Arbour, Ron;
Foley, Ryan J.;
Abolfathi, Bela;
Abramson, Louis E.;
Arcavi, Iair;
Barth, Aaron J.;
Bennert, Vardha N.;
Brandel, Andrew P.;
Cooper, Michael C.;
Cosens, Maren;
Fillingham, Sean P.;
Fulton, Benjamin J.;
Halevi, Goni;
Howell, D. Andrew;
Hsyu, Tiffany;
Kelly, Patrick L.;
Kumar, Sahana;
Li, Linyi;
Li, Wenxiong;
Malkan, Matthew A.;
Manzano-King, Christina;
McCully, Curtis;
Nugent, Peter E.;
Pan, Yen-Chen;
Pei, Liuyi;
Scott, Bryan;
Sexton, Remington Oliver;
Shivvers, Isaac;
Stahl, Benjamin;
Treu, Tommaso;
Valenti, Stefano;
Vogler, H. Alexander;
Walsh, Jonelle L.;
Wang, Xiaofeng
Submitted: 2016-11-28
The Type~Ia supernova (SN~Ia) 2016coj in NGC 4125 (redshift $z=0.004523$) was
discovered by the Lick Observatory Supernova Search 4.9 days after the fitted
first-light time (FFLT; 11.1 days before $B$-band maximum). Our first detection
(pre-discovery) is merely $0.6\pm0.5$ day after the FFLT, making SN 2016coj one
of the earliest known detections of a SN Ia. A spectrum was taken only 3.7 hr
after discovery (5.0 days after the FFLT) and classified as a normal SN Ia. We
performed high-quality photometry, low- and high-resolution spectroscopy, and
spectropolarimetry, finding that SN 2016coj is a spectroscopically normal SN
Ia, but with a high velocity of \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 ($\sim 12,600$\,\kms\
around peak brightness). The \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 velocity evolution can
be well fit by a broken-power-law function for up to a month after the FFLT. SN
2016coj has a normal peak luminosity ($M_B \approx -18.9 \pm 0.2$ mag), and it
reaches a $B$-band maximum \about16.0~d after the FFLT. We estimate there to be
low host-galaxy extinction based on the absence of Na~I~D absorption lines in
our low- and high-resolution spectra. The spectropolarimetric data exhibit weak
polarization in the continuum, but the \ion{Si}{2} line polarization is quite
strong ($\sim 0.9\% \pm 0.1\%$) at peak brightness.