Normalized to: Vingless, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.1819 [pdf] - 1216187
Implications of the delayed 2013 outburst of the ESO 243-49 HLX-1
Submitted: 2014-08-08
After showing four outbursts spaced by $\sim 1$ year from 2009 to 2012, the
hyper luminous X-ray source ESO 243-49 HLX-1, currently the best intermediate
mass black hole (IMBH) candidate, showed an outburst in 2013 delayed by more
than a month. In Lasota et al. (2011), we proposed that the X-ray lightcurve is
the result of enhanced mass transfer episodes at periapsis from a donor star
orbiting the IMBH in a highly eccentric orbit. In this scenario, the delay can
be explained only if the orbital parameters can change suddenly from orbit to
orbit. To investigate this, we ran Newtonian smooth particle hydrodynamical
simulations starting with an incoming donor approaching an IMBH on a parabolic
orbit. We survey a large parameter space by varying the star-to-BH mass ratio
($10^{-5}-10^{-3}$) and the periapsis separation $r_p$ from 2.2 to $2.7~r_t$
with $r_t$, the tidal radius. To model the donor, we choose several polytropes
($\Gamma = 5/2,~n=3/2$; $\Gamma=3/2,~n=2$; $\Gamma=5/3,~n=2$ & $n=3$).
Once the system is formed, the orbital period decreases until reaching a
minimum. Then, the period tends to increase over several periapsis passages due
to tidal effects and increasing mass transfer, leading ultimately to the
ejection of the donor. The development of stochastic fluctuations inside the
donor could lead to sudden changes in the orbital period from orbit to orbit
with the appropriate order of magnitude of what has been observed for HLX-1.
Given the constraints on the BH mass ($M_{\rm BH} > 10^4~M_\odot$) and assuming
that HLX-1 is currently near a minimum in period of $\sim 1$ yr, the donor has
to be a white dwarf or a stripped giant core. We predict that if HLX-1 is
indeed emerging from a minimum in orbital period, then the period would
generally increase with each passage, although substantial stochastic
fluctuations can be superposed on this trend.