Normalized to: Vielzeuf, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.01386 [pdf] - 1996113
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and
light around cosmic voids
Fang, Y.;
Hamaus, N.;
Jain, B.;
Pandey, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Kovács, A.;
Chang, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Choi, A.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-09-03, last modified: 2019-11-11
What are the mass and galaxy profiles of cosmic voids? In this paper we use
two methods to extract voids in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaGiC
galaxy sample to address this question. We use either 2D slices in projection,
or the 3D distribution of galaxies based on photometric redshifts to identify
voids. For the mass profile, we measure the tangential shear profiles of
background galaxies to infer the excess surface mass density. The
signal-to-noise ratio for our lensing measurement ranges between 10.7 and 14.0
for the two void samples. We infer their 3D density profiles by fitting models
based on N-body simulations and find good agreement for void radii in the range
15-85 Mpc. Comparison with their galaxy profiles then allows us to test the
relation between mass and light at the 10%-level, the most stringent test to
date. We find very similar shapes for the two profiles, consistent with a
linear relationship between mass and light both within and outside the void
radius. We validate our analysis with the help of simulated mock catalogues and
estimate the impact of photometric redshift uncertainties on the measurement.
Our methodology can be used for cosmological applications, including tests of
gravity with voids. This is especially promising when the lensing profiles are
combined with spectroscopic measurements of void dynamics via redshift-space
distortions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.02951 [pdf] - 1995564
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: the lensing imprint of cosmic voids
on the Cosmic Microwave Background
Vielzeuf, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Demirbozan, U.;
Fosalba, P.;
Baxter, E.;
Hamaus, N.;
Huterer, D.;
Miquel, R.;
Nadathur, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchón, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Noarbe, I. Sevilla-;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2019-11-06
Cosmic voids gravitationally lens the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
radiation, resulting in a distinct imprint on degree scales. We use the
simulated CMB lensing convergence map from the MICE N-body simulation to
calibrate our detection strategy for a given void definition and galaxy tracer
density. We then identify cosmic voids in DES Year 1 data and stack the Planck
2015 lensing convergence map on their locations, probing the consistency of
simulated and observed void lensing signals. When fixing the shape of the
stacked convergence profile to that calibrated from simulations, we find
imprints at the $3{\sigma}$ significance level for various analysis choices.
The best measurement strategies based on the MICE calibration process yield
$S/N \sim 4$ for DES Y1, and the best-fit amplitude recovered from the data is
consistent with expectations from MICE ($A \sim 1$). Given these results as
well as the agreement between them and N-body simulations, we conclude that the
previously reported excess integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) signal associated with
cosmic voids in DES Y1 has no counterpart in the Planck CMB lensing map.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02212 [pdf] - 1922933
Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT and Planck
Prat, J.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Shin, T.;
Sánchez, C.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Nicola, A.;
Omori, Y.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Chown, R.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, W. B.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
de Haan, T.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Knox, L.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-07-25
Correlations between tracers of the matter density field and gravitational
lensing are sensitive to the evolution of the matter power spectrum and the
expansion rate across cosmic time. Appropriately defined ratios of such
correlation functions, on the other hand, depend only on the angular diameter
distances to the tracer objects and to the gravitational lensing source planes.
Because of their simple cosmological dependence, such ratios can exploit
available signal-to-noise down to small angular scales, even where directly
modeling the correlation functions is difficult. We present a measurement of
lensing ratios using galaxy position and lensing data from the Dark Energy
Survey, and CMB lensing data from the South Pole Telescope and Planck,
obtaining the highest precision lensing ratio measurements to date. Relative to
the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model, we find a best fit lensing ratio amplitude
of $A = 1.1 \pm 0.1$. We use the ratio measurements to generate cosmological
constraints, focusing on the curvature parameter. We demonstrate that
photometrically selected galaxies can be used to measure lensing ratios, and
argue that future lensing ratio measurements with data from a combination of
LSST and Stage-4 CMB experiments can be used to place interesting cosmological
constraints, even after considering the systematic uncertainties associated
with photometric redshift and galaxy shear estimation.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02322 [pdf] - 1924924
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering,
Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Knox, L.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Luong-Van, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Padin, S.;
Pandey, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pryke, C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zahn, O.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three
cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,
and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These
three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical
imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and
millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from
the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy
density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between
these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological
models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation
functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)
yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test
for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the
Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.
Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields
$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.
These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the
first year DES joint-probes analysis.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02441 [pdf] - 1945701
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1
galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing
Omori, Y.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Kirk, D.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Simard, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak
lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an
effective overlapping area of 1289 deg$^{2}$. With the combined measurements
from four source galaxy redshift bins, we reject the hypothesis of no lensing
with a significance of $10.8\sigma$. When employing angular scale cuts, this
significance is reduced to $6.8\sigma$, which remains the highest
signal-to-noise measurement of its kind to date. We fit the amplitude of the
correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial
$\Lambda$CDM model, finding $A = 0.99 \pm 0.17$. We additionally use the
correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias,
obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally,
when performing a cosmological analysis under the $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain
the marginalized constraints of $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.261^{+0.070}_{-0.051}$ and
$S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.660^{+0.085}_{-0.100}$.
These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies,
galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT and Planck data.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.07298 [pdf] - 1760974
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC Redshift
Distributions in DES and SDSS from Cross-Correlations
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rozo, E.;
Frieman, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-19, last modified: 2018-10-03
We present calibrations of the redshift distributions of redMaGiC galaxies in
the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR8
data. These results determine the priors of the redshift distribution of
redMaGiC galaxies, which were used for galaxy clustering measurements and as
lenses for galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements in DES Y1 cosmological analyses.
We empirically determine the bias in redMaGiC photometric redshift estimates
using angular cross-correlations with Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
(BOSS) galaxies. For DES, we calibrate a single parameter redshift bias in
three photometric redshift bins: $z \in[0.15,0.3]$, [0.3,0.45], and [0.45,0.6].
Our best fit results in each bin give photometric redshift biases of $|\Delta
z|<0.01$. To further test the redMaGiC algorithm, we apply our calibration
procedure to SDSS redMaGiC galaxies, where the statistical precision of the
cross-correlation measurement is much higher due to a greater overlap with BOSS
galaxies. For SDSS, we also find best fit results of $|\Delta z|<0.01$. We
compare our results to other analyses of redMaGiC photometric redshifts.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01537 [pdf] - 1743609
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Fang, Y.;
Gruen, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Kokron, N.;
Secco, L. F.;
Jain, B.;
Miquel, R.;
MacCrann, N.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-09-04
We present galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from 1321 sq. deg. of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) data. The lens sample consists of a selection
of 660,000 red galaxies with high-precision photometric redshifts, known as
redMaGiC, split into five tomographic bins in the redshift range $0.15 < z <
0.9$. We use two different source samples, obtained from the Metacalibration
(26 million galaxies) and Im3shape (18 million galaxies) shear estimation
codes, which are split into four photometric redshift bins in the range $0.2 <
z < 1.3$. We perform extensive testing of potential systematic effects that can
bias the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation,
photometric redshifts, and observational properties. Covariances are obtained
from jackknife subsamples of the data and validated with a suite of log-normal
simulations. We use the shear-ratio geometric test to obtain independent
constraints on the mean of the source redshift distributions, providing
validation of those obtained from other photo-$z$ studies with the same data.
We find consistency between the galaxy bias estimates obtained from our
galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements and from galaxy clustering, therefore
showing the galaxy-matter cross-correlation coefficient $r$ to be consistent
with one, measured over the scales used for the cosmological analysis. The
results in this work present one of the three two-point correlation functions,
along with galaxy clustering and cosmic shear, used in the DES cosmological
analysis of Y1 data, and hence the methodology and the systematics tests
presented here provide a critical input for that study as well as for future
cosmological analyses in DES and other photometric galaxy surveys.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.10663 [pdf] - 1728965
Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear
measurements
Troxel, M. A.;
Krause, E.;
Chang, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Chen, A.;
Davis, C.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gatti, M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Prat, J.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2018-04-27, last modified: 2018-07-31
We explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape
noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that
assumes the absence of survey boundary and mask effects. We present an exact
expression for the number of galaxy pairs in this term based on the the survey
mask, which leads to more than a factor of three increase in the shape noise on
the largest measured scales for the Kilo-Degree Survey (KIDS-450) real-space
cosmic shear data. We compare the result of this analytic expression to several
alternative methods for measuring the shape noise from the data and find
excellent agreement. This update to the covariance resolves any internal model
tension evidenced by the previously large cosmological best-fit $\chi^2$ for
the KiDS-450 cosmic shear data. The best-fit $\chi^2$ is reduced from 161 to
121 for 118 degrees of freedom. We also apply a correction to how the
multiplicative shear calibration uncertainty is included in the covariance.
This change, along with a previously known update to the reported effective
angular values of the data vector, jointly shift the inferred amplitude of the
correlation function to higher values. We find that this improves agreement of
the KiDS-450 cosmic shear results with Dark Energy Survey Year 1 and Planck
results.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01532 [pdf] - 1681410
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak
lensing source galaxies
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Rau, M. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Alarcon, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gatti, M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Mudd, D.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-11
We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensing-weighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z-\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30-band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, pre-seeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weak-lensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photo-z procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01538 [pdf] - 1747812
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic
Shear
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Zuntz, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Blazek, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Samuroff, S.;
Prat, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Davis, C.;
Ferté, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Amara, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Choi, A.;
De Vicente, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krawiec, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Peacock, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Stebbins, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-04-30
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state
$w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$ -- $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01535 [pdf] - 1637501
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Curved-Sky Weak Lensing Mass Map
Chang, C.;
Pujol, A.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Melchior, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Jain, B.;
Leistedt, B.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Alarcon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeffrey, N.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2017-12-19
We construct the largest curved-sky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES first-year (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signal-to-noise map, the ratio between the mean signal-to-noise in the E-mode
and the B-mode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
cross-correlation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.02517 [pdf] - 1589408
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts in the
DES -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rozo, E.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-06
We present the calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) weak
lensing source galaxy redshift distributions from clustering measurements. By
cross-correlating the positions of source galaxies with luminous red galaxies
selected by the redMaGiC algorithm we measure the redshift distributions of the
source galaxies as placed into different tomographic bins. These measurements
constrain any such shifts to an accuracy of $\sim0.02$ and can be computed even
when the clustering measurements do not span the full redshift range. The
highest-redshift source bin is not constrained by the clustering measurements
because of the minimal redshift overlap with the redMaGiC galaxies. We compare
our constraints with those obtained from $\texttt{COSMOS}$ 30-band photometry
and find that our two very different methods produce consistent constraints.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00992 [pdf] - 1648618
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods
and Systematics Characterization
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Davis, C.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rau, M. M.;
DeRose, J.;
De Vicente, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hoyle, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.
Submitted: 2017-09-04
We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clustering-based method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we cross-correlate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo-$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo-$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forest-based photo-$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo-$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.08256 [pdf] - 1663185
Cross-Correlation Redshift Calibration Without Spectroscopic Calibration
Samples in DES Science Verification Data
Davis, C.;
Rozo, E.;
Roodman, A.;
Alarcon, A.;
Cawthon, R.;
Gatti, M.;
Lin, H.;
Miquel, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2017-07-25
Galaxy cross-correlations with high-fidelity redshift samples hold the
potential to precisely calibrate systematic photometric redshift uncertainties
arising from the unavailability of complete and representative training and
validation samples of galaxies. However, application of this technique in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) is hampered by the relatively low number density,
small area, and modest redshift overlap between photometric and spectroscopic
samples. We propose instead using photometric catalogs with reliable
photometric redshifts for photo-z calibration via cross-correlations. We verify
the viability of our proposal using redMaPPer clusters from the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey (SDSS) to successfully recover the redshift distribution of SDSS
spectroscopic galaxies. We demonstrate how to combine photo-z with
cross-correlation data to calibrate photometric redshift biases while
marginalizing over possible clustering bias evolution in either the calibration
or unknown photometric samples. We apply our method to DES Science Verification
(DES SV) data in order to constrain the photometric redshift distribution of a
galaxy sample selected for weak lensing studies, constraining the mean of the
tomographic redshift distributions to a statistical uncertainty of $\Delta z
\sim \pm 0.01$. We forecast that our proposal can in principle control
photometric redshift uncertainties in DES weak lensing experiments at a level
near the intrinsic statistical noise of the experiment over the range of
redshifts where redMaPPer clusters are available. Our results provide strong
motivation to launch a program to fully characterize the systematic errors from
bias evolution and photo-z shapes in our calibration procedure.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.03982 [pdf] - 1503913
Cosmic Voids and Void Lensing in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification Data
Sánchez, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Kovacs, A.;
Jain, B.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Nadathur, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Hamaus, N.;
Huterer, D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Amara, A.;
Bonnett, C.;
DeRose, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
Miquel, R.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-05-12, last modified: 2016-10-21
Galaxies and their dark matter halos populate a complicated filamentary
network around large, nearly empty regions known as cosmic voids. Cosmic voids
are usually identified in spectroscopic galaxy surveys, where 3D information
about the large-scale structure of the Universe is available. Although an
increasing amount of photometric data is being produced, its potential for void
studies is limited since photometric redshifts induce line-of-sight position
errors of $\sim50$ Mpc/$h$ or more that can render many voids undetectable. In
this paper we present a new void finder designed for photometric surveys,
validate it using simulations, and apply it to the high-quality photo-$z$
redMaGiC galaxy sample of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES-SV)
data. The algorithm works by projecting galaxies into 2D slices and finding
voids in the smoothed 2D galaxy density field of the slice. Fixing the
line-of-sight size of the slices to be at least twice the photo-$z$ scatter,
the number of voids found in these projected slices of simulated spectroscopic
and photometric galaxy catalogs is within 20% for all transverse void sizes,
and indistinguishable for the largest voids of radius $\sim 70$ Mpc/$h$ and
larger. The positions, radii, and projected galaxy profiles of photometric
voids also accurately match the spectroscopic void sample. Applying the
algorithm to the DES-SV data in the redshift range $0.2<z<0.8$, we identify 87
voids with comoving radii spanning the range 18-120 Mpc/$h$, and carry out a
stacked weak lensing measurement. With a significance of $4.4\sigma$, the
lensing measurement confirms the voids are truly underdense in the matter field
and hence not a product of Poisson noise, tracer density effects or systematics
in the data. It also demonstrates, for the first time in real data, the
viability of void lensing studies in photometric surveys.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.05068 [pdf] - 959638
Evolution of the fine-structure constant in runaway dilaton models
Submitted: 2015-03-17
We study the detailed evolution of the fine-structure constant $\alpha$ in
the string-inspired runaway dilaton class of models of Damour, Piazza and
Veneziano. We provide constraints on this scenario using the most recent
$\alpha$ measurements and discuss ways to distinguish it from alternative
models for varying $\alpha$. For model parameters which saturate bounds from
current observations, the redshift drift signal can differ considerably from
that of the canonical $\Lambda$CDM paradigm at high redshifts. Measurements of
this signal by the forthcoming European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT),
together with more sensitive $\alpha$ measurements, will thus dramatically
constrain these scenarios.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.7031 [pdf] - 850794
Cosmological Effects of Scalar-Photon Couplings: Dark Energy and
Varying-alpha Models
Submitted: 2013-05-30, last modified: 2014-07-14
We study cosmological models involving scalar fields coupled to radiation and
discuss their effect on the redshift evolution of the cosmic microwave
background temperature, focusing on links with varying fundamental constants
and dynamical dark energy. We quantify how allowing for the coupling of scalar
fields to photons, and its important effect on luminosity distances, weakens
current and future constraints on cosmological parameters. In particular, for
evolving dark energy models, joint constraints on the dark energy equation of
state combining BAO radial distance and SN luminosity distance determinations,
will be strongly dominated by BAO. Thus, to fully exploit future SN data one
must also independently constrain photon number non-conservation arising from
the possible coupling of SN photons to the dark energy scalar field. We discuss
how observational determinations of the background temperature at different
redshifts can, in combination with distance measures data, set tight
constraints on interactions between scalar fields and photons, thus breaking
this degeneracy. We also discuss prospects for future improvements,
particularly in the context of Euclid and the E-ELT and show that Euclid can,
even on its own, provide useful dark energy constraints while allowing for
photon number non-conservation.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.4650 [pdf] - 844928
Future mmVLBI Research with ALMA: A European vision
Tilanus, R. P. J.;
Krichbaum, T. P.;
Zensus, J. A.;
Baudry, A.;
Bremer, M.;
Falcke, H.;
Giovannini, G.;
Laing, R.;
van Langevelde, H. J.;
Vlemmings, W.;
Abraham, Z.;
Afonso, J.;
Agudo, I.;
Alberdi, A.;
Alcolea, J.;
Altamirano, D.;
Asadi, S.;
Assaf, K.;
Augusto, P.;
Baczko, A-K.;
Boeck, M.;
Boller, T.;
Bondi, M.;
Boone, F.;
Bourda, G.;
Brajsa, R.;
Brand, J.;
Britzen, S.;
Bujarrabal, V.;
Cales, S.;
Casadio, C.;
Casasola, V.;
Castangia, P.;
Cernicharo, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Clenet, Y.;
Colomer, F.;
Combes, F.;
Cordes, J.;
Coriat, M.;
Cross, N.;
D'Ammando, F.;
Dallacasa, D.;
Desmurs, J-F.;
Eatough, R.;
Eckart, A.;
Eisenacher, D.;
Etoka, S.;
Felix, M.;
Fender, R.;
Ferreira, M.;
Freeland, E.;
Frey, S.;
Fromm, C.;
Fuhrmann, L.;
Gabanyi, K.;
Galvan-Madrid, R.;
Giroletti, M.;
Goddi, C.;
Gomez, J.;
Gourgoulhon, E.;
Gray, M.;
di Gregorio, I.;
Greimel, R.;
Grosso, N.;
Guirado, J.;
Hada, K.;
Hanslmeier, A.;
Henkel, C.;
Herpin, F.;
Hess, P.;
Hodgson, J.;
Horns, D.;
Humphreys, E.;
Kramer, B. Hutawarakorn;
Ilyushin, V.;
Impellizzeri, V.;
Ivanov, V.;
Julião, M.;
Kadler, M.;
Kerins, E.;
Klaassen, P.;
Klooster, K. van 't;
Kording, E.;
Kozlov, M.;
Kramer, M.;
Kreikenbohm, A.;
Kurtanidze, O.;
Lazio, J.;
Leite, A.;
Leitzinger, M.;
Lepine, J.;
Levshakov, S.;
Lico, R.;
Lindqvist, M.;
Liuzzo, E.;
Lobanov, A.;
Lucas, P.;
Mannheim, K.;
Marcaide, J.;
Markoff, S.;
Martí-Vidal, I.;
Martins, C.;
Masetti, N.;
Massardi, M.;
Menten, K.;
Messias, H.;
Migliari, S.;
Mignano, A.;
Miller-Jones, J.;
Minniti, D.;
Molaro, P.;
Molina, S.;
Monteiro, A.;
Moscadelli, L.;
Mueller, C.;
Müller, A.;
Muller, S.;
Niederhofer, F.;
Odert, P.;
Olofsson, H.;
Orienti, M.;
Paladino, R.;
Panessa, F.;
Paragi, Z.;
Paumard, T.;
Pedrosa, P.;
Pérez-Torres, M.;
Perrin, G.;
Perucho, M.;
Porquet, D.;
Prandoni, I.;
Ransom, S.;
Reimers, D.;
Rejkuba, M.;
Rezzolla, L.;
Richards, A.;
Ros, E.;
Roy, A.;
Rushton, A.;
Savolainen, T.;
Schulz, R.;
Silva, M.;
Sivakoff, G.;
Soria-Ruiz, R.;
Soria, R.;
Spaans, M.;
Spencer, R.;
Stappers, B.;
Surcis, G.;
Tarchi, A.;
Temmer, M.;
Thompson, M.;
Torrelles, J.;
Truestedt, J.;
Tudose, V.;
Venturi, T.;
Verbiest, J.;
Vieira, J.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vincent, F.;
Wex, N.;
Wiik, K.;
Wiklind, T.;
Wilms, J.;
Zackrisson, E.;
Zechlin, H.
Submitted: 2014-06-18, last modified: 2014-07-01
Very long baseline interferometry at millimetre/submillimetre wavelengths
(mmVLBI) offers the highest achievable spatial resolution at any wavelength in
astronomy. The anticipated inclusion of ALMA as a phased array into a global
VLBI network will bring unprecedented sensitivity and a transformational leap
in capabilities for mmVLBI. Building on years of pioneering efforts in the US
and Europe the ongoing ALMA Phasing Project (APP), a US-led international
collaboration with MPIfR-led European contributions, is expected to deliver a
beamformer and VLBI capability to ALMA by the end of 2014 (APP: Fish et al.
2013, arXiv:1309.3519).
This report focuses on the future use of mmVLBI by the international users
community from a European viewpoint. Firstly, it highlights the intense science
interest in Europe in future mmVLBI observations as compiled from the responses
to a general call to the European community for future research projects. A
wide range of research is presented that includes, amongst others:
- Imaging the event horizon of the black hole at the centre of the Galaxy
- Testing the theory of General Relativity an/or searching for alternative
theories
- Studying the origin of AGN jets and jet formation
- Cosmological evolution of galaxies and BHs, AGN feedback
- Masers in the Milky Way (in stars and star-forming regions)
- Extragalactic emission lines and astro-chemistry
- Redshifted absorption lines in distant galaxies and study of the ISM and
circumnuclear gas
- Pulsars, neutron stars, X-ray binaries
- Testing cosmology
- Testing fundamental physical constants
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.1007 [pdf] - 1276001
Variations of the fine-structure constant $\alpha$ in exotic singularity
models
Submitted: 2014-06-04
Various classes of exotic singularity models have been studied as possible
mimic models for the observed recent acceleration of the universe. Here we
further study one of these classes and, under the assumption that they are
phenomenological toy models for the behavior of an underlying scalar field
which also couples to the electromagnetic sector of the theory, obtain the
corresponding behavior of the fine-structure constant $\alpha$ for particular
choices of model parameters that have been previously shown to be in reasonable
agreement with cosmological observations. We then compare this predicted
behavior with available measurements of $\alpha$, thus constraining this
putative coupling to electromagnetism. We find that values of the coupling
which would provide a good fit to spectroscopic measurements of $\alpha$ are in
more than three-sigma tension with local atomic clock bounds. Future
measurements by ESPRESSO and ELT-HIRES will provide a definitive test of these
models.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.0520 [pdf] - 812530
Redshift drift test of exotic singularity universes
Submitted: 2014-02-03, last modified: 2014-02-08
We discuss how dynamical dark energy universes with exotic singularities may
be distinguished from the standard $\Lambda$CDM model on the basis of their
redshift drift signal, for which measurements both in the acceleration phase
and in the deep matter era will be provided by forthcoming astrophysical
facilities. Two specific classes of exotic singularity models are studied:
sudden future singularity models and finite scale factor singularity models. In
each class we identify the models which can mimic $\Lambda$CDM and play the
role of dark energy as well as models for which redshift drift signals are
significantly different from $\Lambda$CDM and the test can differentiate
between them.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5841 [pdf] - 1201820
Dark Energy coupling with electromagnetism as seen from future
low-medium redshift probes
Submitted: 2013-11-22, last modified: 2014-02-03
Beyond the standard cosmological model the late-time accelerated expansion of
the universe can be reproduced by the introduction of an additional dynamical
scalar field. In this case, the field is expected to be naturally coupled to
the rest of the theory's fields, unless a (still unknown) symmetry suppresses
this coupling. Therefore, this would possibly lead to some observational
consequences, such as space-time variations of nature's fundamental constants.
In this paper we investigate the coupling between a dynamical Dark Energy model
and the electromagnetic field, and the corresponding evolution of the fine
structure constant ($\alpha$) with respect to the standard local value
$\alpha_0$. In particular, we derive joint constraints on two dynamical Dark
Energy model parametrizations (the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder and Early Dark
Energy model) and on the coupling with electromagnetism $\zeta$, forecasting
future low-medium redshift observations. We combine supernovae and weak lensing
measurements from the Euclid experiment with high-resolution spectroscopy
measurements of fundamental couplings and the redshift drift from the European
Extremely Large Telescope, highlighting the contribution of each probe.
Moreover, we also consider the case where the field driving the $\alpha$
evolution is not the one responsible for cosmic acceleration and investigate
how future observations can constrain this scenario.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.7758 [pdf] - 725765
Fundamental Cosmology in the E-ELT Era
Submitted: 2013-09-30
The recent observational evidence for the acceleration of the universe
demonstrates that canonical theories of cosmology and particle physics are
incomplete - if not incorrect - and that new physics is out there, waiting to
be discovered. The most exciting task for the next generation of astrophysical
facilities is therefore to search for, identify and ultimately characterise
this new physics. Here we summarise ongoing work by CAUP's Dark Side Team
aiming to identify optimal observational strategies for forthcoming facilities.
The discussion is centred around the E-ELT (which will play a key role in this
endeavour), but synergies with other ground and space-based facilities are also
briefly considered. With the expected major improvements in the sensitivity of
standard probes and entirely new ones such as the redshift drift (which the
E-ELT, the SKA and possibly other facilities will measure) a new generation of
precision consistency tests of the standard paradigm will become possible.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.7771 [pdf] - 725770
Varying constants and dark energy with the E-ELT
Submitted: 2013-09-30
The observational possibilities enabled by an ultra-stable CODEX-like
spectrograph at the E-ELT will open new doors in the characterisation of the
nature of Dark Energy. Indeed, it will provide measurements of a so far
unexplored redshift-range ($2<z<5$) and will carry out simultaneously
cosmological tests such as the Sandage-Loeb test and precision tests of the
standard model. Here we will illustrate how, with these abilities, such
spectrographs - alone or in synergy with other facilities - will manage to
constrain cosmological scenarios and test classes of models that would
otherwise be difficult to distinguish from the standard $\Lambda{\rm CDM}$
paradigm.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.7166 [pdf] - 673173
Probing dark energy with redshift-drift
Submitted: 2012-10-26, last modified: 2012-11-19
Future redshift-drift measurements (also known as Sandage-Loeb signal) will
be crucial to probe the so called "redshift desert", thus providing a new tool
for cosmological studies. In this paper we quantify the ability of a future
measurement of the Sandage-Loeb signal by a CODEX-like spectrograph to
constrain a phenomenological parametrization of dynamical dark energy,
specifically by obtaining constraints on $w_0$ and $w_a$. We also demonstrate
that if used alongside CMB data, the Sandage-Loeb measurements will be able to
break degeneracies between expansion parameters, thus greatly improving
cosmological constraints.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.3031 [pdf] - 1152027
Constraining cosmologies with fundamental constants I. Quintessence and
K-Essence
Submitted: 2012-10-10
Many cosmological models invoke rolling scalar fields to account for the
observed acceleration of the expansion of the universe. These theories
generally include a potential V(phi) which is a function of the scalar field
phi. Although V(phi) can be represented by a very diverse set of functions,
recent work has shown the under some conditions, such as the slow roll
conditions, the equation of state parameter w is either independent of the form
of V(phi) or is part of family of solutions with only a few parameters. In
realistic models of this type the scalar field couples to other sectors of the
model leading to possibly observable changes in the fundamental constants such
as the fine structure constant alpha and the proton to electron mass ratio mu.
This paper explores the limits this puts on the validity of various cosmologies
that invoke rolling scalar fields. We find that the limit on the variation of
mu puts significant constraints on the product of a cosmological parameter w+1
times a new physics parameter zeta_mu^2, the coupling constant between mu and
the rolling scalar field. Even when the cosmologies are restricted to very slow
roll conditions either the value of zeta_mu must be at the lower end of or less
than its expected values or the value of w+1 must be restricted to values
vanishingly close to 0. This implies that either the rolling scalar field is
very weakly coupled with the electromagnetic field, small zeta_mu, very weakly
coupled with gravity, w+1 ~ 0 or both. These results stress that adherence to
the measured invariance in mu is a very significant test of the validity of any
proposed cosmology and any new physics it requires. The limits on the variation
of mu also produces a significant tension with the reported changes in the
value of alpha.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.4364 [pdf] - 1116752
Probing dark energy beyond $z=2$ with CODEX
Submitted: 2012-02-20
Precision measurements of nature's fundamental couplings and a first
measurement of the cosmological redshift drift are two of the key targets for
future high-resolution ultra-stable spectrographs such as CODEX. Being able to
do both gives CODEX a unique advantage, allowing it to probe dynamical dark
energy models (by measuring the behavior of their equation of state) deep in
the matter era and thereby testing classes of models that would otherwise be
difficult to distinguish from the standard $\Lambda$CDM paradigm. We illustrate
this point with two simple case studies.