sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Vichare, Geeta

Normalized to: Vichare, G.

3 article(s) in total. 7 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 4,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.03772  [pdf] - 2025283
Does Local Structure Within Shock-sheath and Magnetic Cloud Affect Cosmic Ray Decrease?
Comments: Solar Physics, 15 pages, 6 figures
Submitted: 2016-08-12, last modified: 2016-08-24
The sudden short duration decrease in cosmic ray flux is known as Forbush decrease which is mainly caused by interplanetary disturbances. Generally accepted view is that the first step of Forbush decrease is due to shock sheath and second step is due to Magnetic Cloud (MC) of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection (ICME). However, there are few questions which needs detail investigation. (i) Does the complete (or part of) ICME shock or MC contribute in cosmic ray decrease? (ii) Is there any internal structure associated with the ICMEs shock/MC which precisely contribute in decrease? To address these questions we have studied a total of 18 large ($>=8 \%$) Forbush decrease events and associated ICMEs. Majority of events shows multi-steps Forbush decrease profile. This leads into re-classification of Forbush decrease events depending upon the number of steps observed in their respective profile. The present study clearly indicates that not only broad regions (shock-sheath and MC) contribute to Forbush decrease but also localized structures within shock-sheath and MC have very much significant importance in Forbush decrease profile.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1605.09537  [pdf] - 1483361
Relative contribution of the magnetic field barrier and solar wind speed in ICME-associated Forbush decreases
Comments: 19 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables, Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2016-05-31, last modified: 2016-08-12
We study 50 cosmic ray Forbush decreases (FDs) from the Oulu neutron monitor data during 1997-2005 that were associated with Earth-directed interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). Such events are generally thought to arise due to the shielding of cosmic rays by a propagating diffusive barrier. The main processes at work are the diffusion of cosmic rays across the large-scale magnetic fields carried by the ICME and their advection by the solar wind. In an attempt to better understand the relative importance of these effects, we analyse the relationship between the FD profiles and those of the interplanetary magnetic field (B) and the solar wind speed (Vsw). Over the entire duration of a given FD, we find that the FD profile is generally well (anti)correlated with the B and Vsw profiles. This trend holds separately for the FD main and recovery phases too. For the recovery phases, however, the FD profile is highly anti-correlated with the Vsw profile, but not with the B profile. While the total duration of the FD profile is similar to that of the Vsw profile, it is significantly longer than that of the B profile.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1406.4608  [pdf] - 906363
Understanding Forbush decrease drivers based on shock-only and CME-only models using global signature of February 14, 1978 event
Comments: 24 pages, 11 figures
Submitted: 2014-06-18
We have studied Forbush decrease (FD) event occurred on February 14, 1978 using 43 neutron monitor observatories to understand the global signature of FD. We have studied rigidity dependence of shock amplitude and total FD amplitude. We have found almost the same power law index for both shock phase amplitude and total FD amplitude. Local time variation of shock phase amplitude and maximum depression time of FD have been investigated which indicate possible effect of shock/CME orientation. We have analyzed rigidity dependence of time constants of two phase recovery. Time constants of slow component of recovery phase show rigidity dependence and implies possible effect of diffusion. Solar wind speed was observed to be well correlated with slow component of FD recovery phase. This indicates solar wind speed as possible driver of recovery phase. To investigate the contribution of interplanetary drivers, shock and CME in FD, we have used shock-only and CME-only models. We have applied these models separately to shock phase and main phase amplitudes respectively. This confirms present accepted physical scenario that the first step of FD is due to propagating shock barrier and second step is due to flux rope of CME/magnetic cloud.