Normalized to: Veske, D.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.07188 [pdf] - 2095180
Can we use Next-Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors for Precision
Measurements of Shapiro Delay?
Submitted: 2020-05-14
Shapiro time delay is one of the fundamental tests of general relativity. To
date all measurements of time delay have been conducted on astronomical scales.
It was asserted in 2010 that gravitational wave detectors on Earth could be
used to measure Shapiro delay on a terrestrial scale via massive rotating
systems. Building on that work, we consider how measurements of Shapiro delay
can be made using next-generation gravitational wave detectors. We perform an
analysis for measuring Shapiro delay with the next-generation gravitational
wave detector Cosmic Explorer to determine how precisely the effect can be
measured. Using a rotating mass unit design, we find that Cosmic Explorer can
measure the Shapiro delay signal with an amplitude signal to noise ratio (SNR)
up to $\sim37$ in 1 year of integration time. By measuring Shapiro delay with
this technique, Cosmic Explorer will allow for terrestrial measurements of
$\gamma$ in the paramaterized post-Newtonian formalism of gravity with
precision of $<1\%$.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.05701 [pdf] - 2092283
Constraining Black Hole Populations in Globular Clusters using
Microlensing: Application to Omega Centauri
Submitted: 2019-12-11, last modified: 2020-05-10
We estimate the rate of gravitational microlensing events of cluster stars
due to black holes (BHs) in the globular cluster NGC 5139 ($\omega Cen$).
Theory and observations both indicate that $\omega Cen$ may contain thousands
of BHs, but their mass spectrum and exact distribution are not well
constrained. In this Letter we show that one may observe microlensing events on
a timescale of years in $\omega Cen$, and such an event sample can be used to
infer the BH distribution. Direct detection of BHs will, in the near future,
play a major role in distinguishing binary BH merger channels. Here we explore
how gravitational microlensing can be used to put constraints on BH populations
in globular clusters.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.00566 [pdf] - 2091689
Neutrino emission upper limits with maximum likelihood estimators for
joint astrophysical neutrino searches with large sky localizations
Submitted: 2020-01-02, last modified: 2020-05-07
Since the start of the gravitational wave observation era, no joint high
energy neutrino and gravitational wave event has been found. These
non-detections could be used for setting an upper bound on the neutrino
emission properties for gravitational wave events individually or for a set of
them. Although in the previous joint high energy neutrino and gravitational
wave event searches upper limits have been found, there is a lack of consistent
method for the calculation. The problem addressed in this paper is finding
those limits for astrophysical events which are localized poorly in the sky
where the sensitivities of the neutrino detectors change significantly and can
also emit neutrinos, for example the gravitational wave detections. Here we
describe methods for assigning limits for expected neutrino count, emission
fluence and isotropically equivalent emission based on maximum likelihood
estimators. Then we apply described methods on the three GW detections from
aLIGO's first observing run (O1) and find upper limits for them.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.02910 [pdf] - 2077204
IceCube Search for Neutrinos Coincident with Compact Binary Mergers from
LIGO-Virgo's First Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog
Aartsen, M. G.;
Ackermann, M.;
Adams, J.;
Aguilar, J. A.;
Ahlers, M.;
Ahrens, M.;
Alispach, C.;
Andeen, K.;
Anderson, T.;
Ansseau, I.;
Anton, G.;
Argüelles, C.;
Auffenberg, J.;
Axani, S.;
Bagherpour, H.;
Bai, X.;
V., A. Balagopal;
Barbano, A.;
Bartos, I.;
Barwick, S. W.;
Bastian, B.;
Baum, V.;
Baur, S.;
Bay, R.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, K. -H.;
Tjus, J. Becker;
BenZvi, S.;
Berley, D.;
Bernardini, E.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binder, G.;
Bindig, D.;
Blaufuss, E.;
Blot, S.;
Bohm, C.;
Böser, S.;
Botner, O.;
Böttcher, J.;
Bourbeau, E.;
Bourbeau, J.;
Bradascio, F.;
Braun, J.;
Bron, S.;
Brostean-Kaiser, J.;
Burgman, A.;
Buscher, J.;
Busse, R. S.;
Carver, T.;
Chen, C.;
Cheung, E.;
Chirkin, D.;
Choi, S.;
Clark, B. A.;
Clark, K.;
Classen, L.;
Coleman, A.;
Collin, G. H.;
Conrad, J. M.;
Coppin, P.;
Corley, K. R.;
Correa, P.;
Countryman, S.;
Cowen, D. F.;
Cross, R.;
Dave, P.;
De Clercq, C.;
DeLaunay, J. J.;
Dembinski, H.;
Deoskar, K.;
De Ridder, S.;
Desiati, P.;
de Vries, K. D.;
de Wasseige, G.;
de With, M.;
DeYoung, T.;
Dharani, S.;
Diaz, A.;
Díaz-Vélez, J. C.;
Dujmovic, H.;
Dunkman, M.;
Dvorak, E.;
Eberhardt, B.;
Ehrhardt, T.;
Eller, P.;
Engel, R.;
Evenson, P. A.;
Fahey, S.;
Fazely, A. R.;
Felde, J.;
Filimonov, K.;
Finley, C.;
Fox, D.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Friedman, E.;
Fritz, A.;
Gaisser, T. K.;
Gallagher, J.;
Ganster, E.;
Garrappa, S.;
Gerhardt, L.;
Ghorbani, K.;
Glauch, T.;
Glüsenkamp, T.;
Goldschmidt, A.;
Gonzalez, J. G.;
Grant, D.;
Grégoire, T.;
Griffith, Z.;
Griswold, S.;
Günder, M.;
Gündüz, M.;
Haack, C.;
Hallgren, A.;
Halliday, R.;
Halve, L.;
Halzen, F.;
Hanson, K.;
Haungs, A.;
Hauser, S.;
Hebecker, D.;
Heereman, D.;
Heix, P.;
Helbing, K.;
Hellauer, R.;
Henningsen, F.;
Hickford, S.;
Hignight, J.;
Hill, G. C.;
Hoffman, K. D.;
Hoffmann, R.;
Hoinka, T.;
Hokanson-Fasig, B.;
Hoshina, K.;
Huang, F.;
Huber, M.;
Huber, T.;
Hultqvist, K.;
Hünnefeld, M.;
Hussain, R.;
In, S.;
Iovine, N.;
Ishihara, A.;
Jansson, M.;
Japaridze, G. S.;
Jeong, M.;
Jero, K.;
Jones, B. J. P.;
Jonske, F.;
Joppe, R.;
Kang, D.;
Kang, W.;
Kappes, A.;
Kappesser, D.;
Karg, T.;
Karl, M.;
Karle, A.;
Katz, U.;
Kauer, M.;
Keivani, A.;
Kellermann, M.;
Kelley, J. L.;
Kheirandish, A.;
Kim, J.;
Kintscher, T.;
Kiryluk, J.;
Kittler, T.;
Klein, S. R.;
Koirala, R.;
Kolanoski, H.;
Köpke, L.;
Kopper, C.;
Kopper, S.;
Koskinen, D. J.;
Koundal, P.;
Kowalski, M.;
Krings, K.;
Krückl, G.;
Kulacz, N.;
Kurahashi, N.;
Kyriacou, A.;
Lanfranchi, J. L.;
Larson, M. J.;
Lauber, F.;
Lazar, J. P.;
Leonard, K.;
Leszczynska, A.;
Li, Y.;
Liu, Q. R.;
Lohfink, E.;
Mariscal, C. J. Lozano;
Lu, L.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Ludwig, A.;
Lünemann, J.;
Luszczak, W.;
Lyu, Y.;
Ma, W. Y.;
Madsen, J.;
Maggi, G.;
Mahn, K. B. M.;
Makino, Y.;
Mallik, P.;
Mallot, K.;
Mancina, S.;
Mariş, I. C.;
Marka, S.;
Marka, Z.;
Maruyama, R.;
Mase, K.;
Maunu, R.;
McNally, F.;
Meagher, K.;
Medici, M.;
Medina, A.;
Meier, M.;
Meighen-Berger, S.;
Merino, G.;
Merz, J.;
Meures, T.;
Micallef, J.;
Mockler, D.;
Momenté, G.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moore, R. W.;
Morse, R.;
Moulai, M.;
Muth, P.;
Nagai, R.;
Naumann, U.;
Neer, G.;
Nguyen, L. V.;
Niederhausen, H.;
Nisa, M. U.;
Nowicki, S. C.;
Nygren, D. R.;
Pollmann, A. Obertacke;
Oehler, M.;
Olivas, A.;
O'Murchadha, A.;
O'Sullivan, E.;
Palczewski, T.;
Pandya, H.;
Pankova, D. V.;
Park, N.;
Peiffer, P.;
Heros, C. Pérez de los;
Philippen, S.;
Pieloth, D.;
Pieper, S.;
Pinat, E.;
Pizzuto, A.;
Plum, M.;
Popovych, Y.;
Porcelli, A.;
Price, P. B.;
Przybylski, G. T.;
Raab, C.;
Raissi, A.;
Rameez, M.;
Rauch, L.;
Rawlins, K.;
Rea, I. C.;
Rehman, A.;
Reimann, R.;
Relethford, B.;
Renschler, M.;
Renzi, G.;
Resconi, E.;
Rhode, W.;
Richman, M.;
Robertson, S.;
Rongen, M.;
Rott, C.;
Ruhe, T.;
Ryckbosch, D.;
Cantu, D. Rysewyk;
Safa, I.;
Herrera, S. E. Sanchez;
Sandrock, A.;
Sandroos, J.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sarkar, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Scharf, M.;
Schaufel, M.;
Schieler, H.;
Schlunder, P.;
Schmidt, T.;
Schneider, A.;
Schneider, J.;
Schröder, F. G.;
Schumacher, L.;
Sclafani, S.;
Seckel, D.;
Seunarine, S.;
Shefali, S.;
Silva, M.;
Snihur, R.;
Soedingrekso, J.;
Soldin, D.;
Song, M.;
Spiczak, G. M.;
Spiering, C.;
Stachurska, J.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Stanev, T.;
Stein, R.;
Stettner, J.;
Steuer, A.;
Stezelberger, T.;
Stokstad, R. G.;
Stössl, A.;
Strotjohann, N. L.;
Stürwald, T.;
Stuttard, T.;
Sullivan, G. W.;
Taboada, I.;
Tenholt, F.;
Ter-Antonyan, S.;
Terliuk, A.;
Tilav, S.;
Tollefson, K.;
Tomankova, L.;
Tönnis, C.;
Toscano, S.;
Tosi, D.;
Trettin, A.;
Tselengidou, M.;
Tung, C. F.;
Turcati, A.;
Turcotte, R.;
Turley, C. F.;
Ty, B.;
Unger, E.;
Elorrieta, M. A. Unland;
Usner, M.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Van Driessche, W.;
van Eijk, D.;
van Eijndhoven, N.;
van Santen, J.;
Verpoest, S.;
Veske, D.;
Vraeghe, M.;
Walck, C.;
Wallace, A.;
Wallraff, M.;
Wandkowsky, N.;
Watson, T. B.;
Weaver, C.;
Weindl, A.;
Weiss, M. J.;
Weldert, J.;
Wendt, C.;
Werthebach, J.;
Whelan, B. J.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Wiebe, K.;
Wiebusch, C. H.;
Wille, L.;
Williams, D. R.;
Wills, L.;
Wolf, M.;
Wood, J.;
Wood, T. R.;
Woschnagg, K.;
Wrede, G.;
Wulff, J.;
Xu, D. L.;
Xu, X. W.;
Xu, Y.;
Yanez, J. P.;
Yodh, G.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yuan, T.;
Zöcklein, M.
Submitted: 2020-04-06, last modified: 2020-04-07
Using the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, we search for high-energy neutrino
emission coincident with compact binary mergers observed by the LIGO and Virgo
gravitational wave (GW) detectors during their first and second observing runs.
We present results from two searches targeting emission coincident with the sky
localization of each gravitational wave event within a 1000 second time window
centered around the reported merger time. One search uses a model-independent
unbinned maximum likelihood analysis, which uses neutrino data from IceCube to
search for point-like neutrino sources consistent with the sky localization of
GW events. The other uses the Low-Latency Algorithm for Multi-messenger
Astrophysics, which incorporates astrophysical priors through a Bayesian
framework and includes LIGO-Virgo detector characteristics to determine the
association between the GW source and the neutrinos. No significant neutrino
coincidence is seen by either search during the first two observing runs of the
LIGO-Virgo detectors. We set upper limits on the time-integrated neutrino
emission within the 1000 second window for each of the 11 GW events. These
limits range from 0.02-0.7 $\mathrm{GeV~cm^{-2}}$. We also set limits on the
total isotropic equivalent energy, $E_{\mathrm{iso}}$, emitted in high-energy
neutrinos by each GW event. These limits range from 1.7 $\times$ 10$^{51}$ -
1.8 $\times$ 10$^{55}$ erg. We conclude with an outlook for LIGO-Virgo
observing run O3, during which both analyses are running in real time.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.12346 [pdf] - 2055907
Have hierarchical three-body mergers been detected by LIGO/Virgo?
Submitted: 2020-02-27
One of the proposed channels of binary black hole mergers involves dynamical
interactions of three black holes. In such scenarios, it is possible that all
three black holes merge in a so-called hierarchical merger chain, where two of
the black holes merge first and then their remnant subsequently merges with the
remaining single black hole. Depending on the dynamical environment, it is
possible that both mergers will appear within the observable time window. Here
we perform a search for such merger pairs in the public available LIGO and
Virgo data from the O1/O2 runs. Using a frequentist p-value assignment
statistics we do not find any significant merger pair candidates. Assuming no
observed candidates in O3/O4, we derive upper limits on merger pairs to be
$\sim11-110\ {\rm year^{-1}Gpc^{-3}}$, corresponding to a rate that relative to
the total merger rate is $\sim 0.1-1.0$. From this we argue that both a
detection and a non-detection within the next few years can be used to put
useful constraints on some dynamical progenitor models.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.11467 [pdf] - 1987359
Bayesian Multi-Messenger Search Method for Common Sources of
Gravitational Waves and High-Energy Neutrinos
Submitted: 2018-10-26, last modified: 2019-09-30
Multi-messenger astrophysics is undergoing a transition towards low-latency
searches based on signals that could not individually be established as
discoveries. The rapid identification of signals is important in order to
initiate timely follow-up observations of transient emission that is only
detectable for short time periods. Joint searches for gravitational waves and
high-energy neutrinos represent a prime motivation for this strategy. Both
gravitational waves and high-energy neutrinos are typically emitted over a
short time frame of seconds to minutes during the formation or evolution of
compact objects. In addition, detectors searching for both messengers observe
the whole sky continuously, making observational information on potential
transient sources rapidly available to guide follow-up electromagnetic surveys.
The direction of high-energy neutrinos can be reconstructed to sub-degree
precision, making a joint detection much better localized than a typical
gravitational wave signal. Here we present a search strategy for joint
gravitational wave and high-energy neutrino events that allows the
incorporation of astrophysical priors and detector characteristics following a
Bayesian approach. We aim to determine whether a multi-messenger correlated
signal is a real event, a chance coincidence of two background events or the
chance coincidence of an astrophysical signal and a background event. We use an
astrophysical prior that is model agnostic and takes into account mostly
geometric factors. Our detector characterization in the search is mainly
empirical, enabling detailed realistic accounting for the sensitivity of the
detector that can depend on the source properties. By this means, we will
calculate the false alarm rate for each multi-messenger event which is required
for initiating electromagnetic follow-up campaigns.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.04996 [pdf] - 1942173
Multi-messenger Gravitational-Wave + High-Energy Neutrino Searches with
LIGO, Virgo, and IceCube
Submitted: 2019-08-14
Multi-messenger searches for gravitational waves and high-energy neutrinos
provide important insights into the dynamics of and particle acceleration by
black holes and neutron stars. With LIGO's third observing period (O3), the
number of gravitational wave detections has been substantially increased. The
rapid identification of joint signals is crucial for electromagnetic follow-up
observations of transient emission that is only detectable for short periods of
time. High-energy neutrino direction can be reconstructed to sub-degree
precision, making a joint detection far better localized than a standalone
gravitational-wave signal. We present the latest sensitivity of joint searches
and discuss the Low-Latency Algorithm for Multi-messenger Astrophysics (LLAMA)
that combines LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave candidates and searches in
low-latency for coincident high-energy neutrinos from the IceCube Neutrino
Observatory. We will further discuss future prospects of joint searches from
the perspective of better understanding the interaction of relativistic and
sub-relativistic outflows from binary neutron star mergers.
