Normalized to: Verges, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.07046 [pdf] - 2000185
Cross-correlation of POLARBEAR CMB Polarization Lensing with High-$z$
Sub-mm Herschel-ATLAS galaxies
Faundez, M. Aguilar;
Arnold, K.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Beck, D.;
Bianchini, F.;
Boettger, D.;
Borrill, J.;
Carron, J.;
Cheung, K.;
Chinone, Y.;
Bouhargani, H. El;
Elleflot, T.;
Errard, J.;
Fabbian, G.;
Feng, C.;
Galitzki, N.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Howe, L.;
Kaneko, D.;
Katayama, N.;
Keating, B.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kusaka, A.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leon, D.;
Linder, E.;
Lowry, L. N.;
Matsuda, F.;
Minami, Y.;
Navaroli, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Pham, A. T. P.;
Poletti, D.;
Puglisi, G.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Sherwin, B. D.;
Silva-Feaver, M.;
Stompor, R.;
Suzuki, A.;
Tajima, O.;
Takakura, S.;
Takatori, S.;
Teply, G. P.;
Tsai, C.;
Verges, C.
Submitted: 2019-03-17, last modified: 2019-11-18
We report a 4.8$\sigma$ measurement of the cross-correlation signal between
the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing convergence reconstructed from
measurements of the CMB polarization made by the POLARBEAR experiment and the
infrared-selected galaxies of the Herschel-ATLAS survey. This is the first
measurement of its kind. We infer a best-fit galaxy bias of $b = 5.76 \pm
1.25$, corresponding to a host halo mass of $\log_{10}(M_h/M_\odot)
=13.5^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$ at an effective redshift of $z \sim 2$ from the
cross-correlation power spectrum. Residual uncertainties in the redshift
distribution of the sub-mm galaxies are subdominant with respect to the
statistical precision. We perform a suite of systematic tests, finding that
instrumental and astrophysical contaminations are small compared to the
statistical error. This cross-correlation measurement only relies on CMB
polarization information that, differently from CMB temperature maps, is less
contaminated by galactic and extra-galactic foregrounds, providing a clearer
view of the projected matter distribution. This result demonstrates the
feasibility and robustness of this approach for future high-sensitivity CMB
polarization experiments.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.02116 [pdf] - 1977965
Evidence for the Cross-correlation between Cosmic Microwave Background
Polarization Lensing from POLARBEAR and Cosmic Shear from Subaru Hyper
Suprime-Cam
Namikawa, Toshiya;
Chinone, Yuji;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Oguri, Masamune;
Takahashi, Ryuichi;
Kusaka, Akito;
Katayama, Nobuhiko;
Adachi, Shunsuke;
Aguilar, Mario;
Aihara, Hiroaki;
Ali, Aamir;
Armstrong, Robert;
Arnold, Kam;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Barron, Darcy;
Beck, Dominic;
Beckman, Shawn;
Bianchini, Federico;
Boettger, David;
Borrill, Julian;
Cheung, Kolen;
Corbett, Lance;
Crowley, Kevin T.;
Bouhargani, Hamza El;
Elleflot, Tucker;
Errard, Josquin;
Fabbian, Giulio;
Feng, Chang;
Galitzki, Nicholas;
Goeckner-Wald, Neil;
Groh, John;
Hamada, Takaho;
Hasegawa, Masaya;
Hazumi, Masashi;
Hill, Charles;
Howe, Logan;
Jeong, Oliver;
Kaneko, Daisuke;
Keating, Brian;
Lee, Adrian T.;
Leon, David;
Linder, Eric;
Lowry, Lindsay Ng;
Mangu, Aashrita;
Matsuda, Frederick;
Minami, Yuto;
Miyazaki, Satoshi;
Murayama, Hitoshi;
Navaroli, Martin;
Nishino, Haruki;
Nishizawa, Atsushi J.;
Pham, Anh Thi Phuong;
Poletti, Davide;
Puglisi, Giuseppe;
Reichardt, Christian L.;
Sherwin, Blake D.;
Silva-Feaver, Maximiliano;
Siritanasak, Praween;
Speagle, Joshua S.;
Stompor, Radek;
Suzuki, Aritoki;
Tait, Philip J.;
Tajima, Osamu;
Takada, Masahiro;
Takakura, Satoru;
Takatori, Sayuri;
Tanabe, Daiki;
Tanaka, Masayuki;
Teply, Grant P.;
Tsai, Calvin;
Verges, Clara;
Westbrook, Ben;
Zhou, Yuyang;
Collaboration, The POLARBEAR;
Collaboration, the Subaru HSC SSP
Submitted: 2019-04-03, last modified: 2019-10-11
We present the first measurement of cross-correlation between the lensing
potential, reconstructed from cosmic microwave background (CMB) {\it
polarization} data, and the cosmic shear field from galaxy shapes. This
measurement is made using data from the POLARBEAR CMB experiment and the Subaru
Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. By analyzing an 11~deg$^2$ overlapping region,
we reject the null hypothesis at 3.5$\sigma$\ and constrain the amplitude of
the {\bf cross-spectrum} to $\widehat{A}_{\rm lens}=1.70\pm 0.48$, where
$\widehat{A}_{\rm lens}$ is the amplitude normalized with respect to the
Planck~2018{} prediction, based on the flat $\Lambda$ cold dark matter
cosmology. The first measurement of this {\bf cross-spectrum} without relying
on CMB temperature measurements is possible due to the deep POLARBEAR map with
a noise level of ${\sim}$6\,$\mu$K-arcmin, as well as the deep HSC data with a
high galaxy number density of $n_g=23\,{\rm arcmin^{-2}}$. We present a
detailed study of the systematics budget to show that residual systematics in
our results are negligibly small, which demonstrates the future potential of
this cross-correlation technique.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.02608 [pdf] - 1974580
A Measurement of the Degree Scale CMB B-mode Angular Power Spectrum with
POLARBEAR
Adachi, S.;
Faúndez, M. A. O. Aguilar;
Arnold, K.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Beck, D.;
Beckman, S.;
Bianchini, F.;
Boettger, D.;
Borrill, J.;
Carron, J.;
Chapman, S.;
Cheung, K.;
Chinone, Y.;
Crowley, K.;
Cukierman, A.;
Dobbs, M.;
Bouhargani, H. El;
Elleflot, T.;
Errard, J.;
Fabbian, G.;
Feng, C.;
Fujino, T.;
Galitzki, N.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Groh, J.;
Hall, G.;
Halverson, N.;
Hamada, T.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Hill, C. A.;
Howe, L.;
Inoue, Y.;
Jaehnig, G.;
Jeong, O.;
Kaneko, D.;
Katayama, N.;
Keating, B.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kikuchi, S.;
Kisner, T.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kusaka, A.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leon, D.;
Linder, E.;
Lowry, L. N.;
Mangu, A.;
Matsuda, F.;
Minami, Y.;
Navaroli, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Pham, A. T. P.;
Poletti, D.;
Puglisi, G.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Segawa, Y.;
Silva-Feaver, M.;
Siritanasak, P.;
Stebor, N.;
Stompor, R.;
Suzuki, A.;
Tajima, O.;
Takakura, S.;
Takatori, S.;
Tanabe, D.;
Teply, G. P.;
Tsai, C.;
Verges, C.;
Westbrook, B.;
Zhou, Y.
Submitted: 2019-10-07
We present a measurement of the $B$-mode polarization power spectrum of the
cosmic microwave background (CMB) using taken from July 2014 to December 2016
with the POLARBEAR experiment. The CMB power spectra are measured using
observations at 150 GHz with an instantaneous array sensitivity of
$\mathrm{NET}_\mathrm{array}=23\, \mu \mathrm{K} \sqrt{\mathrm{s}}$ on a 670
square degree patch of sky centered at (RA,
Dec)=($+0^\mathrm{h}12^\mathrm{m}0^\mathrm{s},-59^\circ18^\prime$). A
continuously rotating half-wave plate is used to modulate polarization and to
suppress low-frequency noise. We achieve $32\,\mu\mathrm{K}$-$\mathrm{arcmin}$
effective polarization map noise with a knee in sensitivity of $\ell = 90$,
where the inflationary gravitational wave signal is expected to peak. The
measured $B$-mode power spectrum is consistent with a $\Lambda$CDM lensing and
single dust component foreground model over a range of multipoles $50 \leq \ell
\leq 600$. The data disfavor zero $C_\ell^{BB}$ at $2.2\sigma$ using this
$\ell$ range of POLARBEAR data alone. We cross-correlate our data with Planck
high frequency maps and find the low-$\ell$ $B$-mode power in the combined
dataset to be consistent with thermal dust emission. We place an upper limit on
the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r < 0.90$ at 95% confidence level after
marginalizing over foregrounds.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.03285 [pdf] - 1583250
The correct estimate of the probability of false detection of the
matched filter in the detection of weak signals. II. (Further results with
application to a set of ALMA and ATCA data)
Submitted: 2017-05-09, last modified: 2017-05-26
The matched filter (MF) is one of the most popular and reliable techniques to
the detect signals of known structure and amplitude smaller than the level of
the contaminating noise. Under the assumption of stationary Gaussian noise, MF
maximizes the probability of detection subject to a constant probability of
false detection or false alarm (PFA). This property relies upon a priori
knowledge of the position of the searched signals, which is usually not
available. Recently, it has been shown that when applied in its standard form,
MF may severely underestimate the PFA. As a consequence the statistical
significance of features that belong to noise is overestimated and the
resulting detections are actually spurious. For this reason, an alternative
method of computing the PFA has been proposed that is based on the probability
density function (PDF) of the peaks of an isotropic Gaussian random field. In
this paper we further develop this method. In particular, we discuss the
statistical meaning of the PFA and show that, although useful as a preliminary
step in a detection procedure, it is not able to quantify the actual
reliability of a specific detection. For this reason, a new quantity is
introduced called the specific probability of false alarm (SPFA), which is able
to carry out this computation. We show how this method works in targeted
simulations and apply it to a few interferometric maps taken with the Atacama
Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the Australia Telescope Compact
Array (ATCA). We select a few potential new point sources and assign an
accurate detection reliability to these sources.