sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Vergani, S.

Normalized to: Vergani, S.

130 article(s) in total. 2995 co-authors, from 1 to 95 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 14,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2002.01950  [pdf] - 2118898
Observational constraints on the optical and near-infrared emission from the neutron star-black hole binary merger S190814bv
Ackley, K.; Amati, L.; Barbieri, C.; Bauer, F. E.; Benetti, S.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bhirombhakdi, K.; Botticella, M. T.; Branchesi, M.; Brocato, E.; Bruun, S. H.; Bulla, M.; Campana, S.; Cappellaro, E.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Chambers, K. C.; Chaty, S.; Chen, T. -W.; Ciolfi, R.; Coleiro, A.; Copperwheat, C. M.; Covino, S.; Cutter, R.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; De Cesare, G.; D'Elia, V.; Della Valle, M.; Denneau, L.; De Pasquale, M.; Dhillon, V. S.; Dyer, M. J.; Elias-Rosa, N.; Evans, P. A.; Eyles-Ferris, R. A. J.; Fiore, A.; Fraser, M.; Fruchter, A. S.; Fynbo, J. P. U.; Galbany, L.; Gall, C.; Galloway, D. K.; Getman, F. I.; Ghirlanda, G.; Gillanders, J. H.; Gomboc, A.; Gompertz, B. P.; González-Fernández, C.; González-Gaitán, S.; Grado, A.; Greco, G.; Gromadzki, M.; Groot, P. J.; Gutiérrez, C. P.; Heikkilä, T.; Heintz, K. E.; Hjorth, J.; Hu, Y. -D.; Huber, M. E.; Inserra, C.; Izzo, L.; Japelj, J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Jin, Z. P.; Jonker, P. G.; Kankare, E.; Kann, D. A.; Kennedy, M.; Kim, S.; Klose, S.; Kool, E. C.; Kotak, R.; Kuncarayakti, H.; Lamb, G. P.; Leloudas, G.; Levan, A. J.; Longo, F.; Lowe, T. B.; Lyman, J. D.; Magnier, E.; Maguire, K.; Maiorano, E.; Mandel, I.; Mapelli, M.; Mattila, S.; McBrien, O. R.; Melandri, A.; Michałowski, M. J.; Milvang-Jensen, B.; Moran, S.; Nicastro, L.; Nicholl, M.; Guelbenzu, A. Nicuesa; Nuttal, L.; Oates, S. R.; O'Brien, P. T.; Onori, F.; Palazzi, E.; Patricelli, B.; Perego, A.; Torres, M. A. P.; Perley, D. A.; Pian, E.; Pignata, G.; Piranomonte, S.; Poshyachinda, S.; Possenti, A.; Pumo, M. L.; Quirola-Vásquez, J.; Ragosta, F.; Ramsay, G.; Rau, A.; Rest, A.; Reynolds, T. M.; Rosetti, S. S.; Rossi, A.; Rosswog, S.; Sabha, N. B.; Carracedo, A. Sagués; Salafia, O. S.; Salmon, L.; Salvaterra, R.; Savaglio, S.; Sbordone, L.; Schady, P.; Schipani, P.; Schultz, A. S. B.; Schweyer, T.; Smartt, S. J.; Smith, K. W.; Smith, M.; Sollerman, J.; Srivastav, S.; Stanway, E. R.; Starling, R. L. C.; Steeghs, D.; Stratta, G.; Stubbs, C. W.; Tanvir, N. R.; Testa, V.; Thrane, E.; Tonry, J. L.; Turatto, M.; Ulaczyk, K.; van der Horst, A. J.; Vergani, S. D.; Walton, N. A.; Watson, D.; Wiersema, K.; Wiik, K.; Wyrzykowski, L.; Yang, S.; Yi, S. -X.; Young, D. R.
Comments: 52 pages, revised version now accepted for publication in A&A. Abstract abridged to meet arXiv requirements
Submitted: 2020-02-05, last modified: 2020-06-22
On 2019 August 14, the LIGO and Virgo interferometers detected a high-significance event labelled S190814bv. Preliminary analysis of the GW data suggests that the event was likely due to the merger of a compact binary system formed by a BH and a NS. ElectromagNetic counterparts of GRAvitational wave sources at the VEry Large Telescope (ENGRAVE) collaboration members carried out an intensive multi-epoch, multi-instrument observational campaign to identify the possible optical/near infrared counterpart of the event. In addition, the ATLAS, GOTO, GRAWITA-VST, Pan-STARRS and VINROUGE projects also carried out a search on this event. Our observations allow us to place limits on the presence of any counterpart and discuss the implications for the kilonova (KN) possibly generated by this NS-BH merger, and for the strategy of future searches. Altogether, our observations allow us to exclude a KN with large ejecta mass $M\gtrsim 0.1\,\mathrm{M_\odot}$ to a high ($>90\%$) confidence, and we can exclude much smaller masses in a subsample of our observations. This disfavours the tidal disruption of the neutron star during the merger. Despite the sensitive instruments involved in the campaign, given the distance of S190814bv we could not reach sufficiently deep limits to constrain a KN comparable in luminosity to AT 2017gfo on a large fraction of the localisation probability. This suggests that future (likely common) events at a few hundreds Mpc will be detected only by large facilities with both high sensitivity and large field of view. Galaxy-targeted observations can reach the needed depth over a relevant portion of the localisation probability with a smaller investment of resources, but the number of galaxies to be targeted in order to get a fairly complete coverage is large, even in the case of a localisation as good as that of this event.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.09377  [pdf] - 2117071
Lyman continuum leakage in faint star-forming galaxies at redshift z=3-3.5 probed by gamma-ray bursts
Comments: 13 pages, 9 figures. Abridged abstract. Accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2020-06-16
We present the observations of Lyman continuum (LyC) emission in the afterglow spectra of GRB 191004B at $z=3.5055$, together with those of the other two previously known LyC-emitting long gamma-ray bursts (LGRB) (GRB 050908 at $z=3.3467$, and GRB 060607A at $z=3.0749$), to determine their LyC escape fraction and compare their properties. From the afterglow spectrum of GRB 191004B we determine a neutral hydrogen column density at the LGRB redshift of $\log(N_{\rm HI}/cm^{-2})= 17.2 \pm 0.15$, and negligible extinction ($A_{\rm V}=0.03 \pm 0.02$ mag). The only metal absorption lines detected are CIV and SiIV. In contrast to GRB 050908 and GRB 060607A, the host galaxy of GRB 191004B displays significant Ly$\alpha$ emission. From its Ly$\alpha$ emission and the non-detection of Balmer emission lines we constrain its star-formation rate (SFR) to $1 \leq$ SFR $\leq 4.7$ M$_{\odot}\ yr^{-1}$. We fit the Ly$\alpha$ emission with a shell model and find parameters values consistent with the observed ones. The absolute LyC escape fractions we find for GRB 191004B, GRB 050908 and GRB 060607A are of $0.35^{+0.10}_{-0.11}$, $0.08^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ and $0.20^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$, respectively. We compare the LyC escape fraction of LGRBs to the values of other LyC emitters found from the literature, showing that LGRB afterglows can be powerful tools to study LyC escape for faint high-redshift star-forming galaxies. Indeed we could push LyC leakage studies to much higher absolute magnitudes. The host galaxies of the three LGRB presented here have all $M_{\rm 1600} > -19.5$ mag, with the GRB 060607A host at $M_{\rm 1600} > -16$ mag. LGRB hosts may therefore be particularly suitable for exploring the ionizing escape fraction in galaxies that are too faint or distant for conventional techniques. Furthermore the time investment is very small compared to galaxy studies. [Abridged]
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.07251  [pdf] - 2113441
Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long $\gamma$-ray burst
Acciari, V. A.; Ansoldi, S.; Antonelli, L. A.; Engels, A. Arbet; Baack, D.; Babić, A.; Banerjee, B.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; González, J. Becerra; Bednarek, W.; Bellizzi, L.; Bernardini, E.; Berti, A.; Besenrieder, J.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Blanch, O.; Bonnoli, G.; Bošnjak, Ž.; Busetto, G.; Carosi, R.; Ceribella, G.; Chai, Y.; Chilingaryan, A.; Cikota, S.; Colak, S. M.; Colin, U.; Colombo, E.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Covino, S.; D'Elia, V.; Da Vela, P.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Lotto, B.; Delfino, M.; Delgado, J.; Depaoli, D.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Espiñeira, E. Do Souto; Prester, D. Dominis; Donini, A.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Elsaesser, D.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Fattorini, A.; Ferrara, G.; Fidalgo, D.; Foffano, L.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fruck, C.; Fukami, S.; López, R. J. García; Garczarczyk, M.; Gasparyan, S.; Gaug, M.; Giglietto, N.; Giordano, F.; Godinović, N.; Green, D.; Guberman, D.; Hadasch, D.; Hahn, A.; Herrera, J.; Hoang, J.; Hrupec, D.; Hütten, M.; Inada, T.; Inoue, S.; Ishio, K.; Iwamura, Y.; Jouvin, L.; Kerszberg, D.; Kubo, H.; Kushida, J.; Lamastra, A.; Lelas, D.; Leone, F.; Lindfors, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; López, M.; López-Coto, R.; López-Oramas, A.; Loporchio, S.; Fraga, B. Machado de Oliveira; Maggio, C.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Mallamaci, M.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mannheim, K.; Maraschi, L.; Mariotti, M.; Martínez, M.; Mazin, D.; Mićanović, S.; Miceli, D.; Minev, M.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Molina, E.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende, D.; Moreno, V.; Moretti, E.; Munar-Adrover, P.; Neustroev, V.; Nigro, C.; Nilsson, K.; Ninci, D.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nogués, L.; Nozaki, S.; Paiano, S.; Palatiello, M.; Paneque, D.; Paoletti, R.; Paredes, J. M.; Peñil, P.; Peresano, M.; Persic, M.; Moroni, P. G. Prada; Prandini, E.; Puljak, I.; Rhode, W.; Ribó, M.; Rico, J.; Righi, C.; Rugliancich, A.; Saha, L.; Sahakyan, N.; Saito, T.; Sakurai, S.; Satalecka, K.; Schmidt, K.; Schweizer, T.; Sitarek, J.; Šnidarić, I.; Sobczynska, D.; Somero, A.; Stamerra, A.; Strom, D.; Strzys, M.; Suda, Y.; Surić, T.; Takahashi, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Temnikov, P.; Terzić, T.; Teshima, M.; Torres-Albà, N.; Tosti, L.; Vagelli, V.; van Scherpenberg, J.; Vanzo, G.; Acosta, M. Vazquez; Vigorito, C. F.; Vitale, V.; Vovk, I.; Will, M.; Zarić, D.; Nava, L.; Veres, P.; Bhat, P. N.; Briggs, M. S.; Cleveland, W. H.; Hamburg, R.; Hui, C. M.; Mailyan, B.; Preece, R. D.; Roberts, O.; von Kienlin, A.; Wilson-Hodge, C. A.; Kocevski, D.; Arimoto, M.; Tak, D.; Asano, K.; Axelsson, M.; Barbiellini, G.; Bissaldi, E.; Dirirsa, F. Fana; Gill, R.; Granot, J.; McEnery, J.; Razzaque, S.; Piron, F.; Racusin, J. L.; Thompson, D. J.; Campana, S.; Bernardini, M. G.; Kuin, N. P. M.; Siegel, M. H.; Cenko, S. Bradley; O'Brien, P.; Capalbi, M.; D'Aì, A.; De Pasquale, M.; Gropp, J.; Klingler, N.; Osborne, J. P.; Perri, M.; Starling, R.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tohuvavohu, A.; Ursi, A.; Tavani, M.; Cardillo, M.; Casentini, C.; Piano, G.; Evangelista, Y.; Verrecchia, F.; Pittori, C.; Lucarelli, F.; Bulgarelli, A.; Parmiggiani, N.; Anderson, G. E.; Anderson, J. P.; Bernardi, G.; Bolmer, J.; Caballero-García, M. D.; Carrasco, I. M.; Castellón, A.; Segura, N. Castro; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Cherukuri, S. V.; Cockeram, A. M.; D'Avanzo, P.; Di Dato, A.; Diretse, R.; Fender, R. P.; Fernández-García, E.; Fynbo, J. P. U.; Fruchter, A. S.; Greiner, J.; Gromadzki, M.; Heintz, K. E.; Heywood, I.; van der Horst, A. J.; Hu, Y. -D.; Inserra, C.; Izzo, L.; Jaiswal, V.; Jakobsson, P.; Japelj, J.; Kankare, E.; Kann, D. A.; Kouveliotou, C.; Klose, S.; Levan, A. J.; Li, X. Y.; Lotti, S.; Maguire, K.; Malesani, D. B.; Manulis, I.; Marongiu, M.; Martin, S.; Melandri, A.; Michałowski, M.; Miller-Jones, J. C. A.; Misra, K.; Moin, A.; Mooley, K. P.; Nasri, S.; Nicholl, M.; Noschese, A.; Novara, G.; Pandey, S. B.; Peretti, E.; del Pulgar, C. J. Pérez; Pérez-Torres, M. A.; Perley, D. A.; Piro, L.; Ragosta, F.; Resmi, L.; Ricci, R.; Rossi, A.; Sánchez-Ramírez, R.; Selsing, J.; Schulze, S.; Smartt, S. J.; Smith, I. A.; Sokolov, V. V.; Stevens, J.; Tanvir, N. R.; Thóne, C. C.; Tiengo, A.; Tremou, E.; Troja, E.; Postigo, A. de Ugarte; Vergani, S. D.; Wieringa, M.; Woudt, P. A.; Xu, D.; Yaron, O.; Young, D. R.
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) originate from ultra-relativistic jets launched from the collapsing cores of dying massive stars. They are characterised by an initial phase of bright and highly variable radiation in the keV-MeV band that is likely produced within the jet and lasts from milliseconds to minutes, known as the prompt emission. Subsequently, the interaction of the jet with the external medium generates external shock waves, responsible for the afterglow emission, which lasts from days to months, and occurs over a broad energy range, from the radio to the GeV bands. The afterglow emission is generally well explained as synchrotron radiation by electrons accelerated at the external shock. Recently, an intense, long-lasting emission between 0.2 and 1 TeV was observed from the GRB 190114C. Here we present the results of our multi-frequency observational campaign of GRB~190114C, and study the evolution in time of the GRB emission across 17 orders of magnitude in energy, from $5\times10^{-6}$ up to $10^{12}$\,eV. We find that the broadband spectral energy distribution is double-peaked, with the TeV emission constituting a distinct spectral component that has power comparable to the synchrotron component. This component is associated with the afterglow, and is satisfactorily explained by inverse Compton upscattering of synchrotron photons by high-energy electrons. We find that the conditions required to account for the observed TeV component are not atypical, supporting the possibility that inverse Compton emission is commonly produced in GRBs.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1911.07876  [pdf] - 2030618
GRB 190114C in the nuclear region of an interacting galaxy -- A detailed host analysis using ALMA, HST and VLT
Comments: A&A, in press, 11 pages
Submitted: 2019-11-18
GRB 190114C is the first GRB for which the detection of very-high energy emission up to the TeV range has been reported. It is still unclear whether environmental properties might have contributed to the production of these very high-energy photons, or if it is solely related to the released GRB emission. The relatively low redshift of the GRB (z=0.425) allows us to study the host galaxy of this event in detail, and to potentially identify idiosyncrasies that could point to progenitor characteristics or environmental properties responsible for such a unique event. We use ultraviolet, optical, infrared and submillimetre imaging and spectroscopy obtained with HST, VLT and ALMA to obtain an extensive dataset on which the analysis of the host galaxy is based. The host system is composed of a close pair of interacting galaxies (Delta v = 50 km s^-1), both of which are well-detected by ALMA in CO(3-2). The GRB occurred within the nuclear region (~170 pc from the centre) of the less massive but more star-forming galaxy of the pair. The host is more massive (log(M/M_odot)=9.3) than average GRB hosts at that redshift and the location of the GRB is rather unique. The enhanced star-formation rate was probably triggered by tidal interactions between the two galaxies. Our ALMA observations indicate that both host galaxy and companion have a high molecular gas fraction, as has been observed before in interacting galaxy pairs. The location of the GRB within the core of an interacting galaxy with an extinguished line-of-sight is indicative of a denser environment than typically observed for GRBs and could have been crucial for the generation of the very-high-energy photons that were observed.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1911.00021  [pdf] - 2011975
Simulating MOS science on the ELT: Ly$\alpha$ forest tomography
Comments: 28 pages, accepted to A&A; language edited
Submitted: 2019-10-31, last modified: 2019-11-06
Mapping of the large-scale structure through cosmic time has numerous applications in the studies of cosmology and galaxy evolution. At $z > 2$, the structure can be traced by the neutral intergalactic medium (IGM) by way of observing the Ly$\alpha$, forest towards densely-sampled lines-of-sight of bright background sources, such as quasars and star forming galaxies. We investigate the scientific potential of MOSAIC, a planned multi-object spectrograph on the European Extremely Large Telescope (ELT), for the 3D mapping of the IGM at $z \gtrsim 3$. We simulate a survey of $3 \lesssim z \lesssim 4$ galaxies down to a limiting magnitude of $m_{r}\sim 25.5$ mag in an area of 1 degree$^2$ in the sky. Galaxies and their spectra (including the line-of-sight Ly$\alpha$ absorption) are taken from the lightcone extracted from the Horizon-AGN cosmological hydrodynamical simulation. The quality of the reconstruction of the original density field is studied for different spectral resolutions and signal-to-noise ratios of the spectra. We demonstrate that the minimum $S/N$ (per resolution element) of the faintest galaxies that such survey has to reach is $S/N = 4$. We show that a survey with such sensitivity enables a robust extraction of cosmic filaments and the detection of the theoretically-predicted galaxy stellar mass and star-formation rate gradients towards filaments. By simulating the realistic performance of MOSAIC we obtain $S/N(T_{\rm obs}, R, m_{r})$ scaling relations. We estimate that $\lesssim 35~(65)$ nights of observation time are required to carry out the survey with the instrument's high multiplex mode and with the spectral resolution of $R=1000~(2000)$. A survey with a MOSAIC-concept instrument on the ELT is found to enable the mapping of the IGM at $z > 3$ on Mpc scales, and as such will be complementary to and competitive with other planned IGM tomography surveys. [abridged]
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.14160  [pdf] - 1989155
GRB171010A / SN2017htp: a GRB-SN at z=0.33
Comments: Accepted for publication by MNRAS, 10 pages, 8 figures, 5 tables
Submitted: 2019-10-30
The number of supernovae known to be connected with long-duration gamma-ray bursts is increasing and the link between these events is no longer exclusively found at low redshift ($z \lesssim 0.3$) but is well established also at larger distances. We present a new case of such a liaison at $z = 0.33$ between GRB\,171010A and SN\,2017htp. It is the second closest GRB with an associated supernova of only three events detected by Fermi-LAT. The supernova is one of the few higher redshift cases where spectroscopic observations were possible and shows spectral similarities with the well-studied SN\,1998bw, having produced a similar Ni mass ($M_{\rm Ni}=0.33\pm0.02 ~\rm{M_{\odot}}$) with slightly lower ejected mass ($M_{\rm ej}=4.1\pm0.7~\rm{M_{\odot}}$) and kinetic energy ($E_{\rm K} = 8.1\pm2.5 \times 10^{51} ~\rm{erg}$). The host-galaxy is bigger in size than typical GRB host galaxies, but the analysis of the region hosting the GRB revealed spectral properties typically observed in GRB hosts and showed that the progenitor of this event was located in a very bright HII region of its face-on host galaxy, at a projected distance of $\sim$ 10 kpc from its galactic centre. The star-formation rate (SFR$_{GRB} \sim$ 0.2 M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$) and metallicity (12 + log(O/H) $\sim 8.15 \pm 0.10$) of the GRB star-forming region are consistent with those of the host galaxies of previously studied GRB-SN systems.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.08393  [pdf] - 1947728
The gravitational-wave follow-up program of the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-08-22
The birth of gravitational-wave / electromagnetic astronomy was heralded by the joint observation of gravitational waves (GWs) from a binary neutron star (BNS) merger by Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, GW170817, and of gamma-rays from the short gamma-ray burst GRB170817A by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and INTEGRAL. This detection provided the first direct evidence that at least a fraction of BNSs are progenitors of short GRBs. GRBs are now also known to emit very-high-energy (VHE, > 100 GeV) photons as has been shown by recent independent detections of the GRBs 1901114C and 180720B by the ground-based gamma-ray detectors MAGIC and H.E.S.S. In the next years, the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) will boost the searches for VHE counterparts thanks to its unprecedented sensitivity, rapid response and capability to monitor large sky areas via survey-mode operation. In this contribution, we present the CTA program of observations following the detection of GW events. We discuss various follow-up strategies and links to multi-wavelength and multi-messenger observations. Finally we outline the capabilities and prospects of detecting VHE emission from GW counterparts.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.02309  [pdf] - 1962334
New constraints on the physical conditions in H$_2$-bearing GRB-host damped Lyman-$\alpha$ absorbers
Comments: 15 pages, 15 figures + Appendix. Accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2019-08-06
We report the detections of molecular hydrogen (H$_2$), vibrationally-excited H$_2$ (H$^*_2$), and neutral atomic carbon (CI), in two new afterglow spectra of GRBs\,181020A ($z=2.938$) and 190114A ($z=3.376$), observed with X-shooter at the Very Large Telescope (VLT). Both host-galaxy absorption systems are characterized by strong damped Lyman-$\alpha$ absorbers (DLAs) and substantial amounts of molecular hydrogen with $\log N$(HI, H$_2$) = $22.20\pm 0.05,~20.40\pm 0.04$ (GRB\,181020A) and $\log N$(HI, H$_2$) = $22.15\pm 0.05,~19.44\pm 0.04$ (GRB\,190114A). The DLA metallicites, depletion levels and dust extinctions are [Zn/H] = $-1.57\pm 0.06$, [Zn/Fe] = $0.67\pm 0.03$, and $A_V = 0.27\pm 0.02$\,mag (GRB\,181020A) and [Zn/H] = $-1.23\pm 0.07$, [Zn/Fe] = $1.06\pm 0.08$, and $A_V = 0.36\pm 0.02$\,mag (GRB\,190114A). We then examine the molecular gas content of all known H$_2$-bearing GRB-DLAs and explore the physical conditions and characteristics of these systems. We confirm that H$_2$ is detected in all CI- and H$^*_2$-bearing GRB absorption systems, but that these rarer features are not necessarily detected in all GRB H$_2$ absorbers. We find that a large molecular fraction of $f_{\rm H_2} \gtrsim 10^{-3}$ is required for CI to be detected. The defining characteristic for H$^*_2$ to be present is less clear, though a large H$_2$ column density is an essential factor. We then derive the H$_2$ excitation temperatures of the molecular gas and find that they are relatively low with $T_{\rm ex} \approx 100 - 300$\,K, however, there could be evidence of warmer components populating the high-$J$ H$_2$ levels in GRBs\,181020A and 190114A. Finally, we demonstrate that the otherwise successful X-shooter GRB afterglow campaign is hampered by a significant dust bias excluding the most dust-obscured H$_2$ absorbers from identification [Abridged].
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.01544  [pdf] - 1928283
POSyTIVE -- a GRB population study for the Cherenkov Telescope Array (ICRC-2019)
Comments: 8 pages, Proceedings of the 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference, PoS(ICRC2019)598
Submitted: 2019-08-05
One of the central scientific goals of the next-generation Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) is the detection and characterization of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). CTA will be sensitive to gamma rays with energies from about 20 GeV, up to a few hundred TeV. The energy range below 1 TeV is particularly important for GRBs. CTA will allow exploration of this regime with a ground-based gamma-ray facility with unprecedented sensitivity. As such, it will be able to probe radiation and particle acceleration mechanisms at work in GRBs. In this contribution, we describe POSyTIVE, the POpulation Synthesis Theory Integrated project for very high-energy emission. The purpose of the project is to make realistic predictions for the detection rates of GRBs with CTA, to enable studies of individual simulated GRBs, and to perform preparatory studies for time-resolved spectral analyses. The mock GRB population used by POSyTIVE is calibrated using the entire 40-year dataset of multi-wavelength GRB observations. As part of this project we explore theoretical models for prompt and afterglow emission of long and short GRBs, and predict the expected radiative output. Subsequent analyses are performed in order to simulate the observations with CTA, using the publicly available ctools and Gammapy frameworks. We present preliminary results of the design and implementation of this project.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.04301  [pdf] - 1877394
On the dust properties of high redshift molecular clouds and the connection to the 2175 {\AA} extinction bump
Comments: 10 pages, 5 Figs. + Appendix. Accepted in MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-04-08, last modified: 2019-05-03
We present a study of the extinction and depletion-derived dust properties of gamma-ray burst (GRB) absorbers at $1<z<3$ showing the presence of neutral carbon (\ion{C}{I}). By modelling their parametric extinction laws, we discover a broad range of dust models characterizing the GRB \ion{C}{I} absorption systems. In addition to the already well-established correlation between the amount of \ion{C}{I} and visual extinction, $A_V$, we also observe a correlation with the total-to-selective reddening, $R_V$. All three quantities are also found to be connected to the presence and strength of the 2175\,{\AA} dust extinction feature. While the amount of \ion{C}{I} is found to be correlated with the SED-derived dust properties, we do not find any evidence for a connection with the depletion-derived dust content as measured from [Zn/Fe] and $N$(Fe)$_{\rm dust}$. To reconcile this, we discuss a scenario where the observed extinction is dominated by the composition of dust particles confined in the molecular gas-phase of the ISM. We argue that since the depletion level trace non-carbonaceous dust in the ISM, the observed extinction in GRB \ion{C}{I} absorbers is primarily produced by carbon-rich dust in the molecular cloud and is therefore only observable in the extinction curves and not in the depletion patterns. This also indicates that the 2175\,{\AA} dust extinction feature is caused by dust and molecules in the cold and molecular gas-phase. This scenario provides a possible resolution to the discrepancy between the depletion- and SED-derived amounts of dust in high-$z$ absorbers.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.05935  [pdf] - 1866491
Outflows from dwarf starbursts are ubiquitous: kinematics of z<0.3 GRB-SN hosts resolved with FLAMES
Comments: 21 pages, 18 figures, 3 tables. Submitted to A&A
Submitted: 2019-04-11
The hosts of long duration gamma-ray bursts are predominantly starburst galaxies at subsolar metallicity. At redshifts z<1, this implies that most of them are low-mass dwarf galaxies similar to the populations of blue compact dwarfs and dwarf irregulars. What triggers the massive star-formation needed for producing a GRB progenitor is still largely unknown, as are the resolved gas properties and kinematics of these galaxies and their formation history. Here we present a sample of six spatially resolved GRB hosts at z<0.3 observed with 3D spectroscopy at high spectral resolution (R=8,000-13,000) using FLAMES/VLT. We analyze the resolved gas kinematics in the full and the abundances in a subsample. Only two galaxies show a regular disk-like rotation field, two are dispersion dominated and the others have several narrow emission components associated with different parts of the galaxy, which might indicate recent mergers. All galaxies show evidence for broad components underlying the main narrow emission with FWHM of 150-300 km/s. This broad component is more metal rich than the narrow components, blueshifted and follows a different velocity structure. We find a weak correlation between the star-formation rate and the FHWM of the broad component, its flux relative to the narrow component and the maximum outflow velocity of the gas, but we not find any correlation with the star-formation density, metallicity or stellar mass. We associate this broad component with a metal rich outflow from star-forming regions in the host. The GRB is not found at the brightest or most extreme region of the host but is always associated with a star-forming region showing a clear wind component. Our study shows the great potential of 3D spectroscopy to study the star-formation processes in galaxies hosting extreme transients, the need for high S/N and the dangers using un- or only partially resolved data.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.01426  [pdf] - 1868191
Monte Carlo studies for the optimisation of the Cherenkov Telescope Array layout
Acharyya, A.; Agudo, I.; Angüner, E. O.; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Aloisio, R.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amati, L.; Amato, E.; Ambrosi, G.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Asano, K.; Ashkar, H.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balmaverde, B.; Barai, P.; Barbano, A.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; González, J. Becerra; Tjus, J. Becker; Bellizzi, L.; Benbow, W.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardos, M. I.; Bernlöhr, K.; Berti, A.; Berton, M.; Bertucci, B.; Beshley, V.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bigongiari, C.; Bird, R.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Bordas, P.; Böttcher, M.; Bregeon, J.; Brill, A.; Brown, A. M.; Brügge, K.; Brun, P.; Bruno, P.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Cameron, R.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Caproni, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Caraveo, P.; Caroff, S.; Carosi, R.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Cassol, F.; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Cerruti, M.; Chaty, S.; Chen, A.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiaro, G.; Cieślar, M.; Colak, S. M.; Conforti, V.; Congiu, E.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Cristofari, P.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; Dangeon, L.; Da Vela, P.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; De Lotto, B.; De Martino, D.; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; de Palma, F.; de Souza, V.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Díaz, C.; Diebold, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Dmytriiev, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donini, A.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Ebr, J.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Elsässer, D.; Emery, G.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Feng, Q.; Ferrand, G.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fioretti, V.; Fiori, M.; Flis, S.; Fonseca, M. V.; Fontaine, G.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fukami, S.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Füßling, M.; Gaggero, D.; Galanti, G.; López, R. J. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gascon, D.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaug, M.; Ghalumyan, A.; Gianotti, F.; Giavitto, G.; Giglietto, N.; Giordano, F.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Goldoni, P.; González, J. M.; González, M. M.; Gourgouliatos, K. N.; Grabarczyk, T.; Granot, J.; Green, D.; Greenshaw, T.; Grondin, M. -H.; Gueta, O.; Hadasch, D.; Hassan, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Hervet, O.; Hinton, J.; Hiroshima, N.; Hnatyk, B.; Hofmann, W.; Horvath, P.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hütten, M.; Inada, T.; Iocco, F.; Ionica, M.; Iori, M.; Iwamura, Y.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jean, P.; Jouvin, L.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Kadowaki, L. H. S.; Karkar, S.; Kerszberg, D.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Komin, N.; Kong, A.; Kowal, G.; Krause, M.; Kubo, H.; Kushida, J.; Kushwaha, P.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Arquillo, M. Lallena; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Blanc, O. Le; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lico, R.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, A.; López, M.; Lopez-Oramas, A.; López-Coto, R.; Loporchio, S.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Mach, E.; Maggio, C.; Majumdar, P.; Malaguti, G.; Mallamaci, M.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Marculewicz, M.; Mariotti, M.; Martí, J.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Martínez-Huerta, H.; Masuda, S.; Maxted, N.; Mazin, D.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meyer, M.; Micanovic, S.; Millul, R.; Minaya, I. A.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohrmann, L.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende, D.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Mundell, C.; Murach, T.; Nagai, A.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakamori, T.; Nemmen, R.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Rosillo, M. Nievas; Nikołajuk, M.; Ninci, D.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Nozaki, S.; Ohishi, M.; Ohtani, Y.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Ou, Z.; Oya, I.; Pagliaro, A.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parmiggiani, N.; Parsons, R. D.; Patricelli, B.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Del Campo, P. Peñil; Pérez-Romero, J.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Pfrang, K.; Piel, Q.; Pietropaolo, E.; Pohl, M.; Polo, M.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Produit, N.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Przybilski, H.; Pühlhofer, G.; Punch, M.; Queiroz, F.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rainò, S.; Rando, R.; Razzaque, S.; Reimer, O.; Renault-Tinacci, N.; Renier, Y.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Rizi, V.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Rodriguez-Ramirez, J. C.; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Sadeh, I.; Saha, L.; Saito, T.; Sakurai, S.; Greus, F. Salesa; Sangiorgi, P.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Satalecka, K.; Saturni, F. G.; Sawangwit, U.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schovanek, P.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Sedlaczek, K.; Seglar-Arroyo, M.; Sergijenko, O.; Seweryn, K.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Sol, H.; Specovius, A.; Spencer, S.; Spengler, G.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stolarczyk, T.; Straumann, U.; Suomijarvi, T.; Świerk, P.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Tam, T.; Tavecchio, F.; Taylor, L.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temnikov, P.; Terzic, T.; Testa, V.; Tibaldo, L.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tomankova, L.; Tonev, D.; Torres, D. F.; Tosti, G.; Tosti, L.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Umana, G.; Vagelli, V.; Valentino, M.; Vallage, B.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vigorito, C. F.; Vink, J.; Vitale, V.; Voelk, H.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Wagner, S. J.; Walter, R.; Werner, F.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zampieri, L.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zenin, A.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Zimmer, S.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 48 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2019-04-02
The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) is the major next-generation observatory for ground-based very-high-energy gamma-ray astronomy. It will improve the sensitivity of current ground-based instruments by a factor of five to twenty, depending on the energy, greatly improving both their angular and energy resolutions over four decades in energy (from 20 GeV to 300 TeV). This achievement will be possible by using tens of imaging Cherenkov telescopes of three successive sizes. They will be arranged into two arrays, one per hemisphere, located on the La Palma island (Spain) and in Paranal (Chile). We present here the optimised and final telescope arrays for both CTA sites, as well as their foreseen performance, resulting from the analysis of three different large-scale Monte Carlo productions.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.09041  [pdf] - 1875415
X-ray absorbing column densities of a complete sample of short Gamma Ray Bursts
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication on A&A
Submitted: 2019-03-21
We update a flux-limited complete sample of Swift-based SGRBs (SBAT4, D'Avanzo et al. 2014), bringing it to 25 events and doubling its previous redshift range. We then evaluate the column densities of the events in the updated sample, in order to compare them with the NH distribution of LGRBs, using the sample BAT6ext (Arcodia et al. 2016). We rely on Monte Carlo simulations of the two populations and compare the computed NH distributions with a two sample Kolmogorov Smirnov (K-S) test. We then study how the K-S probability varies with respect to the redshift range we consider. We find that the K-S probability keeps decreasing as redshift increases until at z$\sim$1.8 the probability that short and long GRBs come from the same parent distribution drops below 1$\%$. This testifies for an observational difference among the two populations. This difference may be due to the presence of highly absorbed LGRBs above z$\sim$1.3, which have not been observed in the SGRB sample yet, although this may be due to our inability to detect them, or to the relatively small sample size.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.00469  [pdf] - 1837135
Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a binary neutron star merger
Comments: 28 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of the AAAS for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Science , (2019-02-21), doi: 10.1126/science.aau8815
Submitted: 2018-08-01, last modified: 2019-02-25
The binary neutron star merger event GW170817 was detected through both electromagnetic radiation and gravitational waves. Its afterglow emission may have been produced by either a narrow relativistic jet or an isotropic outflow. High spatial resolution measurements of the source size and displacement can discriminate between these scenarios. We present Very Long Baseline Interferometry observations, performed 207.4 days after the merger, using a global network of 32 radio telescopes. The apparent source size is constrained to be smaller than 2.5 milliarcseconds at the 90% confidence level. This excludes the isotropic outflow scenario, which would have produced a larger apparent size, indicating that GW170817 produced a structured relativistic jet. Our rate calculations show that at least 10% of neutron star mergers produce such a jet.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.02457  [pdf] - 1838318
Are LGRBs biased tracers of star formation? Clues from the host galaxies of the $Swift$/BAT6 complete sample of bright LGRBs III: Stellar masses, star formation rates and metallicities at $z>1$
Comments: 19 pages, 17 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2019-01-08, last modified: 2019-01-24
(Abridged) Long gamma-ray bursts (LGRB) have been suggested as promising tracers of star formation owing to their association with the core-collapse of massive stars. The goal of this work is to characterise the population of host galaxies of LGRBs at 1 < z < 2, investigate the conditions in which LGRBs form at these redshifts and assess their use as tracers of star formation. We perform a spectro-photometric analysis to determine the stellar mass, star formation rate, specific star formation rate and metallicity of the complete, unbiased host galaxy sample of the Swift/BAT6 LGRB sample at 1 < z < 2. We compare the distribution of these properties to the ones of typical star-forming galaxies from the MOSDEF and COSMOS2015 Ultra Deep surveys, within the same redshift range. We find that, similarly to z < 1, LGRBs do not directly trace star formation at 1 < z < 2, and they tend to avoid high-mass, high-metallicity host galaxies. We also find evidence for an enhanced fraction of starbursts among the LGRB host sample with respect to the star-forming population of galaxies. Nonetheless we demonstrate that the driving factor ruling the LGRB efficiency is metallicity. The LGRB host distributions can be reconciled with the ones expected from galaxy surveys by imposing a metallicity upper limit of 12+logOH ~ 8.55. Metallicity rules the LGRB production efficiency, which is stifled at Z > 0.7 Zsun. Under this hypothesis we can expect LGRBs to trace star formation at z > 3, once the bulk of the star forming galaxy population are characterised by metallicities below this limit. The moderately high metallicity threshold found is in agreement with the conditions necessary to rapidly produce a fast-rotating Wolf-Rayet star a in close binary system, and could be accommodated by single star models under chemically homogeneous mixing with very rapid rotation and weak magnetic coupling.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.05500  [pdf] - 1838347
Signatures of a jet cocoon in early spectra of a supernova associated with a $\gamma$-ray burst
Comments: 30 pages, 11 figures, 4 tables. Original author manuscript version of a Letter published in Nature journal. Full article available at https://goo.gl/7y9ZeM
Submitted: 2019-01-16
Long gamma-ray bursts mark the death of massive stars, as revealed by their association with energetic broad-lined stripped-envelope supernovae. The scarcity of nearby events and the brightness of the GRB afterglow, dominating the first days of emission, have so far prevented the study of the very early stages of the GRB-SN evolution. Here we present detailed, multi-epoch spectroscopic observations of SN 2017iuk, associated with GRB 171205A which display features at extremely high expansion velocities of $\sim$ 100,000 km s$^{-1}$ within the first day after the burst. These high-velocity components are characterized by chemical abundances different from those observed in the ejecta of SN 2017iuk at later times. Using spectral synthesis models developed for the SN 2017iuk, we explain these early features as originating not from the supernova ejecta, but from a hot cocoon generated by the energy injection of a mildly-relativistic GRB jet expanding into the medium surrounding the progenitor star. This cocoon becomes rapidly transparent and is outshone by the supernova emission which starts dominating three days after the burst. These results proves that the jet plays an important role not only in powering the GRB event but also its associated supernova.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:1812.03716  [pdf] - 1811239
Investigating the properties of stripped-envelope supernovae, what are the implications for their progenitors?
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS, no changes to the previous submission
Submitted: 2018-12-10, last modified: 2018-12-13
We present observations and analysis of 18 stripped-envelope supernovae observed during 2013 -- 2018. This sample consists of 5 H/He-rich SNe, 6 H-poor/He-rich SNe, 3 narrow lined SNe Ic and 4 broad lined SNe Ic. The peak luminosity and characteristic time-scales of the bolometric light curves are calculated, and the light curves modelled to derive 56Ni and ejecta masses (MNi and Mej). Additionally, the temperature evolution and spectral line velocity-curves of each SN are examined. Analysis of the [O I] line in the nebular phase of eight SNe suggests their progenitors had initial masses $<20$ Msun. The bolometric light curve properties are examined in combination with those of other SE events from the literature. The resulting dataset gives the Mej distribution for 80 SE-SNe, the largest such sample in the literature to date, and shows that SNe Ib have the lowest median Mej, followed by narrow lined SNe Ic, H/He-rich SNe, broad lined SNe Ic, and finally gamma-ray burst SNe. SNe Ic-6/7 show the largest spread of Mej, ranging from $\sim 1.2 - 11$ Msun, considerably greater than any other subtype. For all SE-SNe $<$Mej$>=2.8\pm{1.5}$ Msun which further strengthens the evidence that SE-SNe arise from low mass progenitors which are typically $<5$ Msun at the time of explosion, again suggesting Mzams $<25$ Msun. The low $<$Mej$>$ and lack of clear bimodality in the distribution implies $<30$ Msun progenitors and that envelope stripping via binary interaction is the dominant evolutionary pathway of these SNe.
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:1810.11064  [pdf] - 1806143
Cold gas in the early Universe. Survey for neutral atomic-carbon in GRB host galaxies at 1 < z < 6 from optical afterglow spectroscopy
Comments: Accepted in A&A. 14 pages, 12 figures
Submitted: 2018-10-25
We present a survey for neutral atomic-carbon (CI) along gamma-ray burst (GRB) sightlines, which probes the shielded neutral gas-phase in the interstellar medium (ISM) of GRB host galaxies at high redshift. We compile a sample of 29 medium- to high-resolution GRB optical afterglow spectra spanning a redshift range through most of cosmic time from $1 < z < 6$. We find that seven ($\approx 25\%$) of the GRBs entering our statistical sample have CI detected in absorption. It is evident that there is a strong excess of cold gas in GRB hosts compared to absorbers in quasar sightlines. We investigate the dust properties of the GRB CI absorbers and find that the amount of neutral carbon is positively correlated with the visual extinction, $A_V$, and the strength of the 2175 \AA\ dust extinction feature, $A_{\mathrm{bump}}$. GRBs with CI detected in absorption are all observed above a certain threshold of $\log N$(HI)$/\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ + [X/H] > 20.7 and a dust-phase iron column density of $\log N$(Fe)$_{\mathrm{dust}}/\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ > 16.2. In contrast to the SED-derived dust properties, the strength of the CI absorption does not correlate with the depletion-derived dust properties. This indicates that the GRB CI absorbers trace dusty systems where the dust composition is dominated by carbon-rich dust grains. The observed higher metal and dust column densities of the GRB CI absorbers compared to H$_2$- and CI-bearing quasar absorbers is mainly a consequence of how the two absorber populations are selected, but is also required in the presence of intense UV radiation fields in actively star-forming galaxies.
[19]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.00977  [pdf] - 1771635
Relativistic supernova 2009bb exploded close to an atomic gas cloud
Comments: Accepted by A&A. 18 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables. The ATCA and VLT/MUSE data will be available through CDS linked in the published version
Submitted: 2018-08-02
The potential similarity of the powering mechanisms of relativistic SNe and GRBs allowed us to make a prediction that relativistic SNe are born in environments similar to those of GRBs, that is, ones which are rich in atomic gas. Here we embark on testing this hypothesis by analysing the properties of the host galaxy NGC 3278 of the relativistic SN 2009bb. This is the first time the atomic gas properties of a relativistic SN host are provided and the first time resolved 21 cm-hydrogen-line (HI) information is provided for a host of an SN of any type in the context of the SN position. We obtained radio observations with ATCA covering the HI line, and optical integral field unit spectroscopy observations with MUSE. The atomic gas distribution of NGC 3278 is not centred on the optical galaxy centre, but instead around a third of atomic gas resides in the region close to the SN position. This galaxy has a few times lower atomic and molecular gas masses than predicted from its SFR. SN 2009bb exploded close to the region with the highest SFR density and the lowest age (~5.5 Myr, corresponding to the initial mass of the progenitor star ~36 Mo). As for GRB hosts, the gas properties of NGC 3278 are consistent with a recent inflow of gas from the intergalactic medium, which explains the concentration of atomic gas close to the SN position and the enhanced SFR. Super-solar metallicity at the position of the SN (unlike for most GRBs) may mean that relativistic explosions signal a recent inflow of gas (and subsequent star formation), and their type (GRBs or SNe) is determined either i) by the metallicity of the inflowing gas, so that metal-poor gas results in a GRB explosion and metal-rich gas results in a relativistic SN explosion without an accompanying GRB, or ii) by the efficiency of gas mixing, or iii) by the type of the galaxy.
[20]  oai:arXiv.org:1807.03597  [pdf] - 1720318
X-shooting GRBs at high redshift: probing dust production history
Comments: 13 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables, MNRAS accepted
Submitted: 2018-07-10
Evolved asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars and Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are important contributors to the elements that form dust in the interstellar medium of galaxies, in particular, carbon and iron. However, they require at least a Gyr to start producing these elements, therefore, a change in dust quantity or properties may appear at high redshifts. In this work, we use extinction of gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows as a tool to look for variations in dust properties at z>3. We use a spectroscopically selected sample of GRB afterglows observed with the VLT/X-shooter instrument to determine extinction curves out to high redshifts. We present ten new z>3 X-shooter GRBs of which six are dusty. Combining these with individual extinction curves of three previously known z>3 GRBs, we find an average extinction curve consistent with the SMC-Bar. A comparison with spectroscopically selected GRBs at all redshifts indicates a drop in visual extinction (A_V) at z>3.5 with no moderate or high extinction bursts. We check for observational bias using template spectra and find that GRBs up to z~8 are detectable with X-shooter up to A_V~0.3 mag. Although other biases are noted, a uniformly low dust content above z>3.5 indicates a real drop, suggesting a transition in dust properties and/or available dust building blocks. The remarkable increase in dust content at z<3.5 could arise due to carbon and possibly iron production by the first carbon-rich AGB and Type Ia SNe, respectively. Alternatively, z>3.5 dust drop could be the result of low stellar masses of GRB host galaxies.
[21]  oai:arXiv.org:1807.00635  [pdf] - 1759336
Investigation of dust attenuation and star formation activity in galaxies hosting GRBs
Comments: 21 pages, 18 figures, version accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2018-07-02
The gamma-ray bursts hosts (GRBHs) are excellent targets to study the extinction properties of dust and its effects on the global emission of distant galaxies. The dust extinction curve is measured along the GRB afterglow line of sight and the analysis of the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the host galaxy gives access to the global dust attenuation of the stellar light. We selected a sample of 30 GRBs for which the extinction curve along the GRB afterglow line-of-sight (l.o.s) is measured in the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) up to optical and we analysed the properties of the extinction curve as a function of the host galaxy properties. From these 30 GRBs, we selected seven GRBHs with a good rest-frame UV to near infra-red spectral coverage for the host. The attenuation curve was derived by fitting the SEDs of the GRBH sample with the CIGALE SED fitting code. Different star formation histories were studied to recover the star formation rates (SFR) derived using H$_{\alpha}$ luminosities. The most extinguished GRBs are preferentially found in the more massive hosts and the UV bump is preferentially found in the most extinguished GRB l.o.s. Five out of seven hosts are best fitted with a recent burst of star formation, leading to lower stellar mass estimates than previously found. The average attenuation in the host galaxies is about 70% of the amount of extinction along the GRB l.o.s. We find a great variety in the derived attenuation curves of GRBHs, the UV slope can be similar, flatter or even steeper than the extinction curve slope. We find that the flatter (steeper) attenuation curves are found in galaxies with the highest (lowest) SFR and stellar masses. The comparison of our results with radiative transfer simulations leads to a uniform distribution of dust and stars in a very clumpy ISM for half the GRBHs and various dust-stars geometries for the second half of the sample.
[22]  oai:arXiv.org:1806.10613  [pdf] - 1755963
Host galaxies of SNe Ic-BL with and without long gamma-ray bursts
Comments: 14 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2018-06-27
Broad-line Ic supernovae (SNe Ic-BL) are a very rare class of core-collapse supernovae exhibiting high ejecta velocities and high kinetic energies. They are the only type of SNe that accompany long gamma-ray burst (GRB) explosions. Systematic differences found in the spectra of SNe Ic-BL with and without GRBs (GRB-SNe and SNe Ic-BL, respectively) suggest that either the progenitor or/and explosion mechanism of SNe Ic-BL with and without a GRB differ, or the difference could be only due to the viewing angle of the observer with respect to the orientation of the collimated explosion. We present the systematic comparison of the host galaxies of broad-lined SNe Ic with and without a detected GRB, the latter being detected in untargeted surveys, with the aim to find out whether there are any systematic differences between the environments in which these two classes of SNe preferentially explode. We study photometric properties of the host galaxies of a sample of 8 GRB-SNe and a sample of 28 SNe Ic-BL at z < 0.2. The two galaxy samples have indistinguishable luminosity and proper size distribution. We find indications that GRB-SNe on average occur closer to the centres of their host galaxies, i.e. the samples have a different distribution of projected offsets, normalized by the galaxy sizes. In addition we compare gas-phase metallicities of the GRB-SNe and SNe Ic-BL host samples and find that a larger fraction of super-solar metallicity hosts are found among the SNe Ic-BL without a GRB. Our results are indicative of a genuine difference between the two types of explosions and suggest that the viewing angle is not the main source of difference in the spectra of the two classes. We discuss the implications our results have on our understanding of progenitors of SNe Ic-BL with and without a GRB.
[23]  oai:arXiv.org:1806.01296  [pdf] - 1698271
Highly-ionized metals as probes of the circumburst gas in the natal regions of gamma-ray bursts
Comments: 13 pages, 8 figures + Appendix. Accepted in MNRAS
Submitted: 2018-06-04
We present here a survey of high-ionization absorption lines in the afterglow spectra of long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) obtained with the VLT/X-shooter spectrograph. Our main goal is to investigate the circumburst medium in the natal regions of GRBs. Our primary focus is on the NV 1238,1242 line transitions, but we also discuss other high-ionization lines such as OVI, CIV and SiIV. We find no correlation between the column density of NV and the neutral gas properties such as metallicity, HI column density and dust depletion, however the relative velocity of NV, typically a blueshift with respect to the neutral gas, is found to be correlated with the column density of HI. This may be explained if the NV gas is part of an HII region hosting the GRB, where the region's expansion is confined by dense, neutral gas in the GRB's host galaxy. We find tentative evidence (at 2-sigma significance) that the X-ray derived column density, N_H,X, may be correlated with the column density of NV, which would indicate that both measurements are sensitive to the column density of the gas located in the vicinity of the GRB. We investigate the scenario where NV (and also OVI) is produced by recombination after the corresponding atoms have been stripped entirely of their electrons by the initial prompt emission, in contrast to previous models where highly-ionized gas is produced by photoionization from the GRB afterglow.
[24]  oai:arXiv.org:1805.07318  [pdf] - 1806016
The fraction of ionizing radiation from massive stars that escapes to the intergalactic medium
Comments: 31 pages
Submitted: 2018-05-18
The part played by stars in the ionization of the intergalactic medium remains an open question. A key issue is the proportion of the stellar ionizing radiation that escapes the galaxies in which it is produced. Spectroscopy of gamma-ray burst afterglows can be used to determine the neutral hydrogen column-density in their host galaxies and hence the opacity to extreme ultra-violet radiation along the lines-of-sight to the bursts. Thus, making the reasonable assumption that long-duration GRB locations are representative of the sites of massive stars that dominate EUV production, one can calculate an average escape fraction of ionizing radiation in a way that is independent of galaxy size, luminosity or underlying spectrum. Here we present a sample of NH measures for 138 GRBs in the range 1.6<z<6.7 and use it to establish an average escape fraction at the Lyman limit of <fesc>~0.005, with a 98% confidence upper limit of ~0.015. This analysis suggests that stars provide a small contribution to the ionizing radiation budget of the IGM at z<5, where the bulk of the bursts lie. At higher redshifts, z>5, firm conclusions are limited by the small size of the GRB sample, but any decline in average HI column-density seems to be modest. We also find no indication of a significant correlation of NH with galaxy UV luminosity or host stellar mass, for the subset of events for which these are available. We discuss in some detail a number of selection effects and potential biases. Drawing on a range of evidence we argue that such effects, while not negligible, are unlikely to produce systematic errors of more than a factor ~2, and so would not affect the primary conclusions. Given that many GRB hosts are low metallicity, high specific star-formation rate, dwarf galaxies, these results present a particular problem for the hypothesis that such galaxies dominated the reionization of the universe.
[25]  oai:arXiv.org:1801.06164  [pdf] - 1686720
The evolution of the X-ray afterglow emission of GW 170817 / GRB 170817A in XMM-Newton observations
Comments: Accepted as a Letter in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2018-01-18, last modified: 2018-04-24
We report our observation of the short GRB 170817A, associated to the binary neutron star merger event GW 170817, perfomed in the X-ray band with XMM-Newton 135 d after the event (on the 29th December 2017). We find evidence for a flattening of the X-ray light curve with respect to the previously observed brightening. This is also supported by a nearly simultaneous optical Hubble Space Telescope and successive X-ray Chandra and low-frequency radio observations recently reported in the literature. Since the optical-to-X-ray spectral slope did not change with respect to previous observations, we exclude that the change in the temporal evolution of the light curve is due to the passage of the cooling frequency: its origin must be geometric or dynamical. We interpret all the existing afterglow data with two models: i) a structured jet and ii) a jet-less isotropic fireball with some stratification in its radial velocity structure. Both models fit the data and predict that the radio flux must decrease simultaneously with the optical and the X-ray one, making hard to distinguish between them at the present stage. Polarimetric measures and the rate of short GRB-GW association in future LIGO/Virgo runs will be key to disentangle these two geometrically different scenarios.
[26]  oai:arXiv.org:1712.06950  [pdf] - 1657654
French SKA White Book - The French Community towards the Square Kilometre Array
Acero, F.; Acquaviva, J. -T.; Adam, R.; Aghanim, N.; Allen, M.; Alves, M.; Ammanouil, R.; Ansari, R.; Araudo, A.; Armengaud, E.; Ascaso, B.; Athanassoula, E.; Aubert, D.; Babak, S.; Bacmann, A.; Banday, A.; Barriere, K.; Bellossi, F.; Bernard, J. -P.; Bernardini, M. G.; Béthermin, M.; Blanc, E.; Blanchet, L.; Bobin, J.; Boissier, S.; Boisson, C.; Boselli, A.; Bosma, A.; Bosse, S.; Bottinelli, S.; Boulanger, F.; Boyer, R.; Bracco, A.; Briand, C.; Bucher, M.; Buat, V.; Cambresy, L.; Caillat, M.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Caux, E.; Célestin, S.; Cerruti, M.; Charlot, P.; Chassande-Mottin, E.; Chaty, S.; Christensen, N.; Ciesla, L.; Clerc, N.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Cognard, I.; Combes, F.; Comis, B.; Corbel, S.; Cordier, B.; Coriat, M.; Courtin, R.; Courtois, H.; Da Silva, B.; Daddi, E.; Dallier, R.; Dartois, E.; Demyk, K.; Denis, J. -M.; Denis, L.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Donati, J. -F.; Douspis, M.; van Driel, W.; Korso, M. N. El; Falgarone, E.; Fantina, A.; Farges, T.; Ferrari, A.; Ferrari, C.; Ferrière, K.; Flamary, R.; Gac, N.; Gauffre, S.; Genova, F.; Girard, J.; Grenier, I.; Griessmeier, J. -M.; Guillard, P.; Guillemot, L.; Gulminelli, F.; Gusdorf, A.; Habart, E.; Hammer, F.; Hennebelle, P.; Herpin, F.; Hervet, O.; Hughes, A.; Ilbert, O.; Janvier, M.; Josselin, E.; Julier, A.; Lachaud, C.; Lagache, G.; Lallement, R.; Lambert, S.; Lamy, L.; Langer, M.; Larzabal, P.; Lavaux, G.; Bertre, T. Le; Fèvre, O. Le; Tiec, A. Le; Lefloch, B.; Lehnert, M.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Levrier, F.; Limousin, M.; Lis, D.; López-Sepulcre, A.; Macias-Perez, J.; Magneville, C.; Marcowith, A.; Margueron, J.; Marquette, G.; Marshall, D.; Martin, L.; Mary, D.; Masson, S.; Maurogordato, S.; Mazauric, C.; Mellier, Y.; Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.; Montier, L.; Mottez, F.; Mourard, D.; Nesvadba, N.; Nezan, J. -F.; Noterdaeme, P.; Novak, J.; Ocvirk, P.; Oertel, M.; Olive, X.; Ollier, V.; Palanque-Delabrouille, N.; Pandey-Pommier, M.; Pennec, Y.; Pérault, M.; Peroux, C.; Petit, P.; Pétri, J.; Petiteau, A.; Pety, J.; Pratt, G. W.; Puech, M.; Quertier, B.; Raffin, E.; Harison, S. Rakotozafy; Rawson, S.; Renaud, M.; Revenu, B.; Richard, C.; Richard, J.; Rincon, F.; Ristorcelli, I.; Rodriguez, J.; Schultheis, M.; Schimd, C.; Semelin, B.; Sol, H.; Starck, J. -L.; Tagger, M.; Tasse, C.; Theureau, G.; Torchinsky, S.; Vastel, C.; Vergani, S. D.; Verstraete, L.; Vigouroux, X.; Vilmer, N.; Vilotte, J. -P.; Webb, N.; Ysard, N.; Zarka, P.
Comments: Editor in chief: C. Ferrari; Editors: M. Alves, S. Bosse, S. Corbel, A. Ferrari, K. Ferri\`ere, S. Gauffre, E. Josselin, G. Lagache, S. Lambert, G. Marquette, J.-M. Martin, M.-A. Miville-Desch\^enes, L. Montier, B. Semelin, G. Theureau, S. Vergani, N. Vilmer, P. Zarka; Original file with high resolution figures at SKA-France link: https://ska-france.oca.eu/images/SKA-France-Media/FWB_051017.pdf
Submitted: 2017-12-19, last modified: 2018-03-28
The "Square Kilometre Array" (SKA) is a large international radio telescope project characterised, as suggested by its name, by a total collecting area of approximately one square kilometre, and consisting of several interferometric arrays to observe at metric and centimetric wavelengths. The deployment of the SKA will take place in two sites, in South Africa and Australia, and in two successive phases. From its Phase 1, the SKA will be one of the most formidable scientific machines ever deployed by mankind, and by far the most impressive in terms of data throughput and required computing power. With the participation of almost 200 authors from forty research institutes and six private companies, the publication of this French SKA white paper illustrates the strong involvement in the SKA project of the French astronomical community and of a rapidly growing number of major scientific and technological players in the fields of Big Data, high performance computing, energy production and storage, as well as system integration.
[27]  oai:arXiv.org:1710.04638  [pdf] - 1697940
The THESEUS space mission concept: science case, design and expected performances
Amati, L.; O'Brien, P.; Goetz, D.; Bozzo, E.; Tenzer, C.; Frontera, F.; Ghirlanda, G.; Labanti, C.; Osborne, J. P.; Stratta, G.; Tanvir, N.; Willingale, R.; Attina, P.; Campana, R.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Contini, C.; Fuschino, F.; Gomboc, A.; Hudec, R.; Orleanski, P.; Renotte, E.; Rodic, T.; Bagoly, Z.; Blain, A.; Callanan, P.; Covino, S.; Ferrara, A.; Floch, E. Le; Marisaldi, M.; Mereghetti, S.; Rosati, P.; Vacchi, A.; D'Avanzo, P.; Giommi, P.; Gomboc, A.; Piranomonte, S.; Piro, L.; Reglero, V.; Rossi, A.; Santangelo, A.; Salvaterra, R.; Tagliaferri, G.; Vergani, S.; Vinciguerra, S.; Briggs, M.; Campolongo, E.; Ciolfi, R.; Connaughton, V.; Cordier, B.; Morelli, B.; Orlandini, M.; Adami, C.; Argan, A.; Atteia, J. -L.; Auricchio, N.; Balazs, L.; Baldazzi, G.; Basa, S.; Basak, R.; Bellutti, P.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bertuccio, G.; Braga, J.; Branchesi, M.; Brandt, S.; Brocato, E.; Budtz-Jorgensen, C.; Bulgarelli, A.; Burderi, L.; Camp, J.; Capozziello, S.; Caruana, J.; Casella, P.; Cenko, B.; Chardonnet, P.; Ciardi, B.; Colafrancesco, S.; Dainotti, M. G.; D'Elia, V.; De Martino, D.; De Pasquale, M.; Del Monte, E.; Della Valle, M.; Drago, A.; Evangelista, Y.; Feroci, M.; Finelli, F.; Fiorini, M.; Fynbo, J.; Gal-Yam, A.; Gendre, B.; Ghisellini, G.; Grado, A.; Guidorzi, C.; Hafizi, M.; Hanlon, L.; Hjorth, J.; Izzo, L.; Kiss, L.; Kumar, P.; Kuvvetli, I.; Lavagna, M.; Li, T.; Longo, F.; Lyutikov, M.; Maio, U.; Maiorano, E.; Malcovati, P.; Malesani, D.; Margutti, R.; Martin-Carrillo, A.; Masetti, N.; McBreen, S.; Mignani, R.; Morgante, G.; Mundell, C.; Nargaard-Nielsen, H. U.; Nicastro, L.; Palazzi, E.; Paltani, S.; Panessa, F.; Pareschi, G.; Pe'er, A.; Penacchioni, A. V.; Pian, E.; Piedipalumbo, E.; Piran, T.; Rauw, G.; Razzano, M.; Read, A.; Rezzolla, L.; Romano, P.; Ruffini, R.; Savaglio, S.; Sguera, V.; Schady, P.; Skidmore, W.; Song, L.; Stanway, E.; Starling, R.; Topinka, M.; Troja, E.; van Putten, M.; Vanzella, E.; Vercellone, S.; Wilson-Hodge, C.; Yonetoku, D.; Zampa, G.; Zampa, N.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, B. B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. -N.; Antonelli, A.; Bianco, F.; Boci, S.; Boer, M.; Botticella, M. T.; Boulade, O.; Butler, C.; Campana, S.; Capitanio, F.; Celotti, A.; Chen, Y.; Colpi, M.; Comastri, A.; Cuby, J. -G.; Dadina, M.; De Luca, A.; Dong, Y. -W.; Ettori, S.; Gandhi, P.; Geza, E.; Greiner, J.; Guiriec, S.; Harms, J.; Hernanz, M.; Hornstrup, A.; Hutchinson, I.; Israel, G.; Jonker, P.; Kaneko, Y.; Kawai, N.; Wiersema, K.; Korpela, S.; Lebrun, V.; Lu, F.; MacFadyen, A.; Malaguti, G.; Maraschi, L.; Melandri, A.; Modjaz, M.; Morris, D.; Omodei, N.; Paizis, A.; Pata, P.; Petrosian, V.; Rachevski, A.; Rhoads, J.; Ryde, F.; Sabau-Graziati, L.; Shigehiro, N.; Sims, M.; Soomin, J.; Szecsi, D.; Urata, Y.; Uslenghi, M.; Valenziano, L.; Vianello, G.; Vojtech, S.; Watson, D.; Zicha, J.
Comments: Accepted for publication in Advances in Space Research. Partly based on the proposal submitted on October 2016 in response to the ESA Call for next M5 mission, with expanded and updated science sections
Submitted: 2017-10-12, last modified: 2018-03-27
THESEUS is a space mission concept aimed at exploiting Gamma-Ray Bursts for investigating the early Universe and at providing a substantial advancement of multi-messenger and time-domain astrophysics. These goals will be achieved through a unique combination of instruments allowing GRB and X-ray transient detection over a broad field of view (more than 1sr) with 0.5-1 arcmin localization, an energy band extending from several MeV down to 0.3 keV and high sensitivity to transient sources in the soft X-ray domain, as well as on-board prompt (few minutes) follow-up with a 0.7 m class IR telescope with both imaging and spectroscopic capabilities. THESEUS will be perfectly suited for addressing the main open issues in cosmology such as, e.g., star formation rate and metallicity evolution of the inter-stellar and intra-galactic medium up to redshift $\sim$10, signatures of Pop III stars, sources and physics of re-ionization, and the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function. In addition, it will provide unprecedented capability to monitor the X-ray variable sky, thus detecting, localizing, and identifying the electromagnetic counterparts to sources of gravitational radiation, which may be routinely detected in the late '20s / early '30s by next generation facilities like aLIGO/ aVirgo, eLISA, KAGRA, and Einstein Telescope. THESEUS will also provide powerful synergies with the next generation of multi-wavelength observatories (e.g., LSST, ELT, SKA, CTA, ATHENA).
[28]  oai:arXiv.org:1712.08153  [pdf] - 1709303
THESEUS: a key space mission concept for Multi-Messenger Astrophysics
Comments: 25 pages, 13 figures, accepted to Advances in Space Research with minor revisions. Details on the THESEUS instrumentation, science case and expected performances can also be found in Amati et al. 2017 (arXiv:1710.04638) and in the presentations of the THESEUS Workshop 2017 (http://www.isdc.unige.ch/theseus/workshop2017-programme.html). v2 few typos corrected
Submitted: 2017-12-21, last modified: 2018-03-27
The recent discovery of the electromagnetic counterpart of the gravitational wave source GW170817, has demonstrated the huge informative power of multi-messenger observations. During the next decade the nascent field of multi-messenger astronomy will mature significantly. Around 2030, third generation gravitational wave detectors will be roughly ten times more sensitive than the current ones. At the same time, neutrino detectors currently upgrading to multi km^3 telescopes, will include a 10 km^3 facility in the Southern hemisphere that is expected to be operational around 2030. In this review, we describe the most promising high frequency gravitational wave and neutrino sources that will be detected in the next two decades. In this context, we show the important role of the Transient High Energy Sky and Early Universe Surveyor (THESEUS), a mission concept proposed to ESA by a large international collaboration in response to the call for the Cosmic Vision Programme M5 missions. THESEUS aims at providing a substantial advancement in early Universe science as well as playing a fundamental role in multi-messenger and time-domain astrophysics, operating in strong synergy with future gravitational wave and neutrino detectors as well as major ground- and space-based telescopes. This review is an extension of the THESEUS white paper (Amati et al. 2017), also in light of the discovery of GW170817/GRB170817A that was announced on October 16th, 2017.
[29]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.07727  [pdf] - 1846762
The X-shooter GRB afterglow legacy sample (XS-GRB)
Comments: 41 pages, 10 Figures, 4 Tables. Submitted to A&A. Paper and code also available at https://github.com/jselsing/XSGRB-sample-paper
Submitted: 2018-02-21
In this work we present spectra of all $\gamma$-ray burst (GRB) afterglows that have been promptly observed with the X-shooter spectrograph until 31-03-2017. In total, we obtained spectroscopic observations of 103 individual GRBs observed within 48 hours of the GRB trigger. Redshifts have been measured for 97 per cent of these, covering a redshift range from 0.059 to 7.84. Based on a set of observational selection criteria that minimize biases with regards to intrinsic properties of the GRBs, the follow-up effort has been focused on producing a homogeneous sample of 93 afterglow spectra for GRBs discovered by the Swift satellite. We here provide a public release of all the reduced spectra, including continuum estimates and telluric absorption corrections. For completeness, we also provide reductions for the 18 late-time observations of the underlying host galaxies. We provide an assessment of the degree of completeness with respect to the parent GRB population, in terms of the X-ray properties of the bursts in the sample and find that the sample presented here is representative of the full Swift sample. We constrain the fraction of dark bursts to be < 28 per cent and we confirm previous results that higher optical darkness is correlated with increased X-ray absorption. For the 42 bursts for which it is possible, we provide a measurement of the neutral hydrogen column density, increasing the total number of published HI column density measurements by $\sim$ 33 per cent. This dataset provides a unique resource to study the ISM across cosmic time, from the local progenitor surroundings to the intervening universe.
[30]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.01676  [pdf] - 1630420
The Infra-Red Telescope on board the THESEUS mission
Comments: To be published in the Proceedings of the THESEUS Workshop 2017 (http://www.isdc.unige.ch/theseus/workshop2017.html), Journal of the Italian Astronomical Society (Mem.SAIt), Editors L. Amati, E. Bozzo, M. Della Valle, D. Gotz, P. O'Brien. Details on the THESEUS mission concept can be found in the white paper Amati et al. 2017 (arXiv:171004638) and Stratta et al. 2017 (arXiv:1712.08153)
Submitted: 2018-02-05
The Infra-Red Telescope (IRT) on board the Transient High Energy Sky and Early Universe Surveyor (THESEUS) ESA M5 candidate mission will play a key role in identifying and characterizing moderate to high redshift Gamma-Ray Bursts afterglows. The IRT is the enabling instrument on board THESEUS for measuring autonomously the redshift of the several hundreds of GRBs detected per year by the Soft X-ray Imager (SXI) and the X- and Gamma-Ray Imaging Spectrometer (XGIS), and thus allowing the big ground based telescopes to be triggered on a redshift pre-selected sample, and finally fulfilling the cosmological goals of the mission. The IRT will be composed by a primary mirror of 0.7 m of diameter coupled to a single camera in a Cassegrain design. It will work in the 0.7-1.8 {\mu}m wavelength range, and will provide a 10x10 arc min imaging field of view with sub-arc second localization capabilities, and, at the same time, a 5x5 arc min field of view with moderate (R up to ~500) spectroscopic capabilities. Its sensitivity, mainly limited by the satellite jitter, is adapted to detect all the GRBs, localized by the SXI/XGIS, and to acquire spectra for the majority of them.
[31]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.01689  [pdf] - 1630433
Gamma-ray bursts as tracers of star-formation rate and metallicity evolution with THESEUS
Comments: To be published in the Proceedings of the THESEUS Workshop 2017 (http://www.isdc.unige.ch/theseus/workshop2017.html), Journal of the Italian Astronomical Society (Mem.SAIt), Editors L. Amati, E. Bozzo, M. Della Valle, D. Gotz, P. O'Brien. Details on the THESEUS mission concept can be found in the white paper Amati et al. 2017 (arXiv:171004638) and Stratta et al. 2017 (arXiv:1712.08153)
Submitted: 2018-02-05
The class of long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) is associated with the collapse of the most massive stars, making them a tool to investigate star formation in the early Universe. Furthermore, thanks to their exceptional brightness, LGRB afterglows can be used as extra-galactic background sources capable of unveiling the properties of the cold/warm gas of their hosting galaxies, up to the highest redshifts. Therefore LGRBs allow, uniquely, the combination of the information on different phases of the gas, through the absorption lines present in the afterglow spectra and the emission (continuum and lines) properties obtained from host galaxy photometry and spectroscopy, once the afterglow disappeared. To date, the main problem to carry out this kind of studies at very high redshift is the poor number of GRBs detected at $z>5$. The THESEUS mission will hugely increase such number, as it is expected to detect $>100$ GRBs at $z>5$. Therefore, THESEUS will bring a unique and fundamental contribution to the understanding of the chemical enrichment of the universe and of the evolution of galaxies and star formation up to the highest redshift.
[32]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.00424  [pdf] - 1630174
A Molecular gas rich GRB host galaxy at the peak of cosmic star formation
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-09-01, last modified: 2018-01-22
We report the detection of the CO(3-2) emission line from the host galaxy of Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) 080207 at $z$ = 2.086. This is the first detection of molecular gas in emission from a GRB host galaxy beyond redshift 1. We find this galaxy to be rich in molecular gas with a mass of $1.1 \times 10^{11}\,\rm M_{\odot}$ assuming $\alpha_{\rm CO}=$ 4.36 $\rm M_{\odot}(\rm K\,km\,s^{-1}\,pc^2)^{-1}$. The molecular gas mass fraction of the galaxy is $\sim$ 0.5, typical of star forming galaxies (SFGs) with similar stellar masses and redshifts. With a $\rm SFR_{FIR}$ of 260 $\rm M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$, we measure a molecular-gas-depletion timescale of 0.43 Gyr, near the peak of the depletion timescale distribution of SFGs at similar redshifts. Our findings are therefore in contradiction with the proposed molecular gas deficiency in GRB host galaxies. We argue that the reported molecular gas deficiency for GRB hosts could be the artifact of improper comparisons or neglecting the effect of the typical low metallicities of GRB hosts on the CO-to-molecular-gas conversion factor. We also compare the kinematics of the CO(3-2) emission line to that of the H$\alpha$ emission line from the host galaxy. We find the H$\alpha$ emission to have contributions from two separate components, a narrow and a broad one. The narrow component matches the CO emission well in velocity space. The broad component, with a FWHM of $\sim$ 1100 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$, is separated by $+390$ $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ in velocity space from the narrow component. We speculate this broad component to be associated with a powerful outflow in the host galaxy or in an interacting system.
[33]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.07997  [pdf] - 1838112
Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Consortium, The Cherenkov Telescope Array; :; Acharya, B. S.; Agudo, I.; Samarai, I. Al; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrosi, G.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Araya, M.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Backes, M.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Bamba, A.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; Becherini, Y.; Belfiore, A.; Benbow, W.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernardos, M.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Braiding, C.; Bregeon, J.; Brill, A.; Brown, A. M.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Buanes, T.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capitanio, F.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cárdenas, V.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Cerruti, M.; Chadwick, P.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R. C. G.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Coco, V.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Covino, S.; Crocker, R.; Cuadra, J.; Cuevas, O.; Cumani, P.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; D'Urso, D.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; De Lucia, M.; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Diebold, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Domínguez, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Dubus, G.; Dwarkadas, V. V.; Ebr, J.; Eckner, C.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Elsässer, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Espinoza, C.; Evoli, C.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Farnier, C.; Fasola, G.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Fesquet, M.; Filipovic, M.; Fioretti, V.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Fortson, L.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fruck, C.; Fujita, Y.; Fukazawa, Y.; Funk, S.; Füßling, M.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Gallant, Y.; Garcia, B.; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gaskins, J.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaug, M.; Gerard, L.; Giavitto, G.; Giglietto, N.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gómez-Vargas, G.; González, M. M.; González, J. M.; Götz, D.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Green, A. J.; Greenshaw, T.; Griffiths, S.; Gunji, S.; Hadasch, D.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Hermann, G.; Hinton, J.; Hnatyk, B.; Hofmann, W.; Holder, J.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hütten, M.; Iarlori, M.; Inada, T.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Iwamura, Y.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jean, P.; Jung-Richardt, I.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Karkar, S.; Katagiri, H.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kazanas, D.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Kisaka, S.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Kosack, K.; Kraus, M.; Krause, M.; Krauß, F.; Kubo, H.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Palombara, N.; Lamanna, G.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Blanc, O. Le; Leach, S.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lenain, J. -P.; Lico, R.; Limon, M.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; López, M.; López-Coto, R.; Lu, C. -C.; Lucarelli, F.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Malaguti, G.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Marcowith, A.; Marín, J.; Markoff, S.; Martí, J.; Martin, P.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Masetti, N.; Masuda, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Mazin, D.; Medina, C.; Melandri, A.; Mereghetti, S.; Meyer, M.; Minaya, I. A.; Mirabal, N.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Mohrmann, L.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende-Parrilla, D.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Mundell, C.; Murach, T.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Nagai, A.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakamori, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nosek, D.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; O'Brien, P.; Oakes, L.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Padovani, M.; Paizis, A.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parsons, R. D.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Piano, G.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Pohl, M.; Polo, M.; Pozo, D.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Principe, G.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pühlhofer, G.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Queiroz, F.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rainò, S.; Razzaque, S.; Reimer, O.; Reimer, A.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Rezaeian, A. H.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Rosado, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Sadeh, I.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salina, G.; Sánchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Saturni, F. G.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schulz, A.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Seitenzahl, I.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Servillat, M.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Sidoli, L.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Sol, H.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stephan, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Suomijarvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Terrier, R.; Terzic, T.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tian, W.; Tibaldo, L.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tomastik, J.; Tonev, D.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Tothill, N.; Tovmassian, G.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Tsujimoto, S.; Umana, G.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Eldik, C.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vercellone, S.; Veres, P.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vigorito, C.; Villanueva, J.; Voelk, H.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vrastil, M.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Walter, R.; Ward, J. E.; Warren, D.; Watson, J. J.; Werner, F.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wilcox, P.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Wood, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Ziegler, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 213 pages, including references and glossary. Version 2: credits and references updated, some figures updated, and author list updated
Submitted: 2017-09-22, last modified: 2018-01-21
The Cherenkov Telescope Array, CTA, will be the major global observatory for very high energy gamma-ray astronomy over the next decade and beyond. The scientific potential of CTA is extremely broad: from understanding the role of relativistic cosmic particles to the search for dark matter. CTA is an explorer of the extreme universe, probing environments from the immediate neighbourhood of black holes to cosmic voids on the largest scales. Covering a huge range in photon energy from 20 GeV to 300 TeV, CTA will improve on all aspects of performance with respect to current instruments. The observatory will operate arrays on sites in both hemispheres to provide full sky coverage and will hence maximize the potential for the rarest phenomena such as very nearby supernovae, gamma-ray bursts or gravitational wave transients. With 99 telescopes on the southern site and 19 telescopes on the northern site, flexible operation will be possible, with sub-arrays available for specific tasks. CTA will have important synergies with many of the new generation of major astronomical and astroparticle observatories. Multi-wavelength and multi-messenger approaches combining CTA data with those from other instruments will lead to a deeper understanding of the broad-band non-thermal properties of target sources. The CTA Observatory will be operated as an open, proposal-driven observatory, with all data available on a public archive after a pre-defined proprietary period. Scientists from institutions worldwide have combined together to form the CTA Consortium. This Consortium has prepared a proposal for a Core Programme of highly motivated observations. The programme, encompassing approximately 40% of the available observing time over the first ten years of CTA operation, is made up of individual Key Science Projects (KSPs), which are presented in this document.
[34]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.04132  [pdf] - 1591084
ThunderKAT: The MeerKAT Large Survey Project for Image-Plane Radio Transients
Comments: To be published in "MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA". Proceedings of Science. Workshop held 25-27 May, 2016 Stellenbosch, South Africa
Submitted: 2017-11-11
ThunderKAT is the image-plane transients programme for MeerKAT. The goal as outlined in 2010, and still today, is to find, identify and understand high-energy astrophysical processes via their radio emission (often in concert with observations at other wavelengths). Through a comprehensive and complementary programme of surveying and monitoring Galactic synchrotron transients (across a range of compact accretors and a range of other explosive phenomena) and exploring distinct populations of extragalactic synchrotron transients (microquasars, supernovae and possibly yet unknown transient phenomena) - both from direct surveys and commensal observations - we will revolutionise our understanding of the dynamic and explosive transient radio sky. As well as performing targeted programmes of our own, we have made agreements with the other MeerKAT large survey projects (LSPs) that we will also search their data for transients. This commensal use of the other surveys, which remains one of our key programme goals in 2016, means that the combined MeerKAT LSPs will produce by far the largest GHz-frequency radio transient programme to date.
[35]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.02706  [pdf] - 1608597
The luminous, massive and solar metallicity galaxy hosting the Swift gamma-ray burst, GRB 160804A at z = 0.737
Comments: 12 pages, 8 figures; Accepted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-11-07
We here present the spectroscopic follow-up observations with VLT/X-shooter of the Swift long-duration gamma-ray burst GRB 160804A at z = 0.737. Typically, GRBs are found in low-mass, metal-poor galaxies which constitute the sub-luminous population of star-forming galaxies. For the host galaxy of the GRB presented here we derive a stellar mass of $\log(M_*/M_{\odot}) = 9.80\pm 0.07$, a roughly solar metallicity (12+log(O/H) = $8.74\pm 0.12$) based on emission line diagnostics, and an infrared luminosity of $M_{3.6/(1+z)} = -21.94$ mag, but find it to be dust-poor ($E(B-V) < 0.05$ mag). This establishes the galaxy hosting GRB 160804A as one of the most luminous, massive and metal-rich GRB hosts at z < 1.5. Furthermore, the gas-phase metallicity is found to be representative of the physical conditions of the gas close to the explosion site of the burst. The high metallicity of the host galaxy is also observed in absorption, where we detect several strong FeII transitions as well as MgII and MgI. While host galaxy absorption features are common in GRB afterglow spectra, we detect absorption from strong metal lines directly in the host continuum (at a time when the afterglow was contributing to < 15%). Finally, we discuss the possibility that the geometry and state of the absorbing and emitting gas is indicative of a galactic scale outflow expelled at the final stage of two merging galaxies.
[36]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.03483  [pdf] - 1588207
Cherenkov Telescope Array Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017)
Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Portella, V. Acín; Adams, C.; Agudo, I.; Aharonian, F.; Samarai, I. Al; Alberdi, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Aloisio, R.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Asano, A.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Ballo, L.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barai, P.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Bednarek, W.; Belfiore, A.; Benbow, W.; Benito, M.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernardos, M.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Salucci, C. Bertinelli; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bettane, J.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bird, R.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Boccato, C.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Bozhilov, V.; Braiding, C.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brill, A.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Brown, A. M.; Brown, S.; Brügge, K.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brun, F.; Brunetti, L.; Brunetti, G.; Bruno, P.; Bryan, M.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Caccianiga, A.; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capitanio, F.; Caproni, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Caraveo, P.; Cárdenas, V.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carlile, C.; Caroff, S.; Carosi, R.; Carosi, A.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Silva, C. Celestino; Celli, S.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chakraborty, N.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Chitnis, V. R.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Clark, P.; Coco, V.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Cornat, R.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Cristofari, P.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Crovari, C.; Cuadra, J.; Cuevas, O.; Cui, X.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; D'Urso, D.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; De Lucia, M.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Deiml, P.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Reznicek, M. Delfino; Delgado, C.; Mengual, J. Delgado; Della Ceca, R.; della Volpe, D.; Detournay, M.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Diaz, L.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Domínguez, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durkalec, A.; Dwarkadas, V.; Ebr, J.; Eckner, C.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Evoli, C.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Farakos, K.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, J. P.; Finley, C.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Flores, H.; Foffano, L.; Föhr, C.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Fraga, B.; Franco, F. J.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fruck, C.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Füßling, M.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Garcia, B.; Garcia, A.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, F.; Gargano, C.; Garozzo, S.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaté, F.; Gaug, M.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Giammaria, P.; Gianotti, F.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gómez, J. L.; Gómez-Vargas, G.; González, M. M.; González, J. M.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Guarino, V.; Guest, B.; Gueta, O.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hahn, A.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashida, M.; He, H.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hiroshima, N.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J. K.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holder, J.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Hull, G.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Hütten, M.; Iarlori, M.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Ingallinera, A.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Ionica, M.; Iori, M.; Iriarte, A.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, F.; Jankowsky, D.; Jansweijer, P.; Jarnot, C.; Jean, P.; Johnson, C. A.; Josselin, M.; Jung-Richardt, I.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Kachru, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kraus, M.; Krause, M.; Krauß, F.; Krennrich, F.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kumar, S.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; Kushwaha, P.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Lahmann, R.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landoni, M.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Blanc, O. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Leach, S.; Leckngam, A.; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lico, R.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Lipniacka, A.; Lloyd, S.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, M.; Lopez-Coto, R.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Maier, G.; Majczyna, A.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Malyshev, D.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marcowith, A.; Marín, J.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martin, L.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, O.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Melandri, A.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Mereghetti, S.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Micanovic, S.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mievre, I.; Miller, J.; Minaya, I. A.; Mineo, T.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Mohrmann, L.; Molijn, C.; Molinari, E.; Moncada, R.; Montaruli, T.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende-Parrilla, D.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Murach, T.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Murphy, A.; Nagai, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Neise, D.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; Nunio, F.; O'Brien, P.; Oakes, L.; Ocampo, C.; Ochoa, J. P.; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Ou, Z.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papitto, A.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parsons, R. D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Del Campo, P. Peñil; Perez, A.; Pérez-Torres, M. A.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrera, S.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Piano, G.; Piel, Q.; Pieloth, D.; Pintore, F.; García, C. Pio; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Pizarro, L.; Platos, Ł.; Pohl, M.; Poireau, V.; Pollo, A.; Porthault, J.; Poutanen, J.; Pozo, D.; Prandini, E.; Prasit, P.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Queiroz, F.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Razzaque, S.; Reichardt, I.; Reimer, O.; Reimer, A.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A. H.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; del Mazo, J. E. Ruíz; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Russo, F.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Hatlen, E. Sæther; Safi-Harb, S.; Sahakian, V.; Sailer, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salina, G.; Sanchez, D.; Sánchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Saturni, F. G.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Schanne, S.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schulz, A.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Seglar-Arroyo, M.; Segreto, A.; Seitenzahl, I.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shah, K.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shilon, I.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Singh, B. B.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sokolenko, A.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Springer, W.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stuik, R.; Suchenek, M.; Suomijarvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Tanci, C.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tian, W.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Trakarnsirinont, N.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Tsirou, M.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Berg, A. M. Van den; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Veres, P.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Villanueva, J.; Vincent, P.; Vink, J.; Visconti, F.; Vittorini, V.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, P.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Ward, M.; Ward, J. E.; Warren, D.; Watson, J. J.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Weniger, C.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Winter, M.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yaguna, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: Index of Cherenkov Telescope Array conference proceedings at the ICRC2017, Busan, Korea
Submitted: 2017-09-11, last modified: 2017-10-24
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium presented at the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference, July 12-20 2017, Busan, Korea.
[37]  oai:arXiv.org:1710.05858  [pdf] - 1589846
Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron star merger
Comments: version accepted for publication in Nature. Some minor changes are expected with respect to the journal version
Submitted: 2017-10-16
The merger of two neutron stars is predicted to give rise to three major detectable phenomena: a short burst of gamma-rays, a gravitational wave signal, and a transient optical/near-infrared source powered by the synthesis of large amounts of very heavy elements via rapid neutron capture (the r-process). Such transients, named "macronovae" or "kilonovae", are believed to be centres of production of rare elements such as gold and platinum. The most compelling evidence so far for a kilonova was a very faint near-infrared rebrightening in the afterglow of a short gamma-ray burst at z = 0.356, although findings indicating bluer events have been reported. Here we report the spectral identification and describe the physical properties of a bright kilonova associated with the gravitational wave source GW 170817 and gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A associated with a galaxy at a distance of 40 Mpc from Earth. Using a series of spectra from ground-based observatories covering the wavelength range from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared, we find that the kilonova is characterized by rapidly expanding ejecta with spectral features similar to those predicted by current models. The ejecta is optically thick early on, with a velocity of about 0.2 times light speed, and reaches a radius of about 50 astronomical units in only 1.5 days. As the ejecta expands, broad absorption-like lines appear on the spectral continuum indicating atomic species produced by nucleosynthesis that occurs in the post-merger fast-moving dynamical ejecta and in two slower (0.05 times light speed) wind regions. Comparison with spectral models suggests that the merger ejected 0.03-0.05 solar masses of material, including high-opacity lanthanides.
[38]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.08865  [pdf] - 1588880
Colour variations in the GRB 120327A afterglow
Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2017-09-26
We present a comprehensive temporal and spectral analysis of the long Swift GRB 120327A afterglow data to investigate the possible causes of the observed early time colour variations. We collected data from various instruments/telescopes in different bands (X-rays, ultra- violet, optical and near-infrared) and determined the shapes of the afterglow early-time light curves. We studied the overall temporal behaviour and the spectral energy distributions from early to late times. The ultra-violet, optical, and near-infrared light curves can be modelled with a single power-law component between 200 and 2e4 s after the burst event. The X-ray light curve shows a canonical steep-shallow-steep behaviour, typical of long gamma-ray bursts. At early times a colour variation is observed in the ultra-violet/optical bands, while at very late times a hint of a re-brightening is visible. The observed early time colour change can be explained as a variation in the intrinsic optical spectral index, rather than an evolution of the optical extinction.
[39]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.06574  [pdf] - 1593627
Mass and metallicity scaling relations of high redshift star-forming galaxies selected by GRBs
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-09-19
We present a comprehensive study of the relations between gas kinematics, metallicity, and stellar mass in a sample of 82 GRB-selected galaxies using absorption and emission methods. We find the velocity widths of both emission and absorption profiles to be a proxy of stellar mass. We also investigate the velocity-metallicity correlation and its evolution with redshift and find the correlation derived from emission lines to have a significantly smaller scatter compared to that found using absorption lines. Using 33 GRB hosts with measured stellar mass and metallicitiy, we study the mass-metallicity relation for GRB host galaxies in a stellar mass range of $10^{8.2} M_{\odot}$ to $10^{11.1} M_{\odot}$ and a redshift range of $ z\sim 0.3-3.4$. The GRB-selected galaxies appear to track the mass-metallicity relation of star forming galaxies but with an offset of 0.15 towards lower metallicities. This offset is comparable with the average error-bar on the metallicity measurements of the GRB sample and also the scatter on the MZ relation of the general population. It is hard to decide whether this relatively small offset is due to systematic effects or the intrinsic nature of GRB hosts. We also investigate the possibility of using absorption-line metallicity measurements of GRB hosts to study the mass-metallicity relation at high redshifts. Our analysis shows that the metallicity measurements from absorption methods can significantly differ from emission metallicities and assuming identical measurements from the two methods may result in erroneous conclusions.
[40]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.01084  [pdf] - 1602615
Solving the conundrum of intervening strong MgII absorbers towards GRBs and quasars
Comments: 10 pages, accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2017-09-04
Previous studies have shown that the incidence rate of intervening strong MgII absorbers towards GRBs were a factor of 2 - 4 higher than towards quasars. Exploring the similar sized and uniformly selected legacy data sets XQ-100 and XSGRB, each consisting of 100 quasar and 81 GRB afterglow spectra obtained with a single instrument (VLT/X-shooter), we demonstrate that there is no disagreement in the number density of strong MgII absorbers with rest-frame equivalent widths $W_r^{2796} >$ 1 {\AA} towards GRBs and quasars in the redshift range 0.1 < z < 5. With large and similar sample sizes, and path length coverages of $\Delta$z = 57.8 and 254.4 for GRBs and quasars, respectively, the incidences of intervening absorbers are consistent within 1 sigma uncertainty levels at all redshifts. For absorbers at z < 2.3 the incidence towards GRBs is a factor of 1.5$\pm$0.4 higher than the expected number of strong MgII absorbers in SDSS quasar spectra, while for quasar absorbers observed with X-shooter we find an excess factor of 1.4$\pm$0.2 relative to SDSS quasars. Conversely, the incidence rates agree at all redshifts with reported high spectral resolution quasar data, and no excess is found. The only remaining discrepancy in incidences is between SDSS MgII catalogues and high spectral resolution studies. The rest-frame equivalent width distribution also agrees to within 1 sigma uncertainty levels between the GRB and quasar samples. Intervening strong MgII absorbers towards GRBs are therefore neither unusually frequent, nor unusually strong.
[41]  oai:arXiv.org:1704.05509  [pdf] - 1582652
The MUSE view of the host galaxy of GRB 100316D
Comments: 19 pages, 17 figures, 6 tables. Updated version after referee comments. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-04-18, last modified: 2017-08-29
The low distance, $z=0.0591$, of GRB 100316D and its association with SN 2010bh represent two important motivations for studying this host galaxy and the GRB's immediate environment with the Integral-Field Spectrographs like VLT/MUSE. Its large field-of-view allows us to create 2D maps of gas metallicity, ionization level, and the star-formation rate distribution maps, as well as to investigate the presence of possible host companions. The host is a late-type dwarf irregular galaxy with multiple star-forming regions and an extended central region with signatures of on-going shock interactions. The GRB site is characterized by the lowest metallicity, the highest star-formation rate and the youngest ($\sim$ 20-30 Myr) stellar population in the galaxy, which suggest a GRB progenitor stellar population with masses up to 20 -- 40 $M_{\odot}$. We note that the GRB site has an offset of $\sim$660pc from the most luminous SF region in the host. The observed SF activity in this galaxy may have been triggered by a relatively recent gravitational encounter between the host and a small undetected ($L_{H\alpha} \leq 10^{36}$ erg/s) companion.
[42]  oai:arXiv.org:1704.05851  [pdf] - 1582676
Where and when: optimal scheduling of the electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational-wave events based on counterpart lightcurve models
Comments: 22 pages, 11 figures. Submitted to ApJ
Submitted: 2017-04-19, last modified: 2017-08-01
The electromagnetic (EM) follow-up of a gravitational wave (GW) event requires to scan a wide sky region, defined by the so called "skymap", for the detection and identification of a transient counterpart. We propose a novel method that exploits information encoded in the GW signal to construct a "detectability map", which represents the time-dependent ("when") probability to detect the transient at each position of the skymap ("where"). Focusing on the case of a neutron star binary inspiral, we model the associated short gamma-ray burst afterglow and macronova emission, using the probability distributions of binary parameters (sky position, distance, orbit inclination, mass ratio) extracted from the GW signal as inputs. The resulting family of possible lightcurves is the basis to construct the detectability map. As a practical example, we apply the method to a simulated GW signal produced by a neutron star merger at 75 Mpc whose localization uncertainty is very large (about 1500 square degrees). We construct observing strategies based on the detectability maps for optical, infrared and radio facilities, taking VST, VISTA and MeerKAT as prototypes. Assuming limiting fluxes of r ~ 24.5, J ~ 22.4 (AB magnitudes) and 500 uJy @ 1.4 GHz for ~ 1000 s of exposure each, the afterglow and macronova emissions are successfully detected with a minimum observing time of 7, 15 and 5 hours respectively.
[43]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.01452  [pdf] - 1732526
The host galaxy of the short GRB111117A at $z = 2.211$: impact on the short GRB redshift distribution and progenitor channels
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Submitted for publication in A&A. All data, code and calculations related to the paper along with the paper itself are available at https://github.com/jselsing/GRB111117A
Submitted: 2017-07-03
It is notoriously difficult to localize short $\gamma$-ray bursts (sGRBs) and their hosts to measure their redshifts. These measurements, however, are critical to constrain the nature of sGRB progenitors, their redshift distribution and the $r$-process element enrichment history of the universe. Here, we present spectroscopy of the host galaxy of GRB111117A and measure its redshift to be $z = 2.211$. This makes GRB111117A the most distant high-confidence short duration GRB detected to date. Our spectroscopic redshift supersedes a lower, previously estimated photometric redshift value for this burst. We use the spectroscopic redshift, as well as new imaging data to constrain the nature of the host galaxy and the physical parameters of the GRB. The rest-frame X-ray derived hydrogen column density, for example, is the highest compared to a complete sample of sGRBs and seems to follow the evolution with redshift as traced by the hosts of long GRBs (lGRBs). The host lies in the brighter end of the expected sGRB host brightness distribution at $z = 2.211$, and is actively forming stars. Using the host as a benchmark for redshift determination, we find that between 43 and 71 per cent of all sGRB redshifts should be missed due to host faintness for hosts at $z\sim2$. The high redshift of GRB111117A is evidence against a lognormal delay-time model for sGRBs through the predicted redshift distribution of sGRBs, which is very sensitive to high-$z$ sGRBs. From the age of the universe at the time of GRB explosion, an initial neutron star (NS) separation of $a_0 < 3.2~R_\odot$ is required in the case where the progenitor system is a circular pair of inspiralling NSs. This constraint excludes some of the longest sGRB formation channels for this burst.
[44]  oai:arXiv.org:1704.04136  [pdf] - 2039686
Prospects for CTA observations of the young SNR RX J1713.7-3946
Consortium, The CTA; :; Acero, F.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J.; Amato, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Backes, M.; Balazs, C.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Barkov, M.; Barrio, J. A.; Benbow, W.; Bernlöhr, K.; Beshley, V.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Braiding, C.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Brown, A. M.; Bugaev, V.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Böttcher, M.; Cameron, R.; Capalbi, M.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Carosi, R.; Cascone, E.; Cerruti, M.; Chaty, S.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Chudoba, J.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Colafrancesco, S.; Conforti, V.; Contreras, J. L.; Costa, A.; Cotter, G.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Urso, D.; Daniel, M.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; de Naurois, M.; De Palma, F.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J.; Dumas, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Díaz, C.; Ebr, J.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Elsässer, D.; Eschbach, S.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Fasola, G.; Fedorova, E.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Fesquet, M.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovíc, M. D.; Fioretti, V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Franco, F. J.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fujita, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Förster, A.; Gadola, A.; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Giglietto, N.; Giordano, F.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J.; Gnatyk, R.; Goldoni, P.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Green, A. J.; Griffiths, S.; Gunji, S.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hassan, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Hinton, J.; Hnatyk, B.; Huet, J.; Huetten, M.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Hörandel, J.; Ikeno, Y.; Inada, T.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Jacquemier, J.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Katagiri, H.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koyama, S.; Kraus, M.; Kubo, H.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kushida, J.; La Palombara, N.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landt, H.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Lee, S.; Lees, J.; Lefaucheur, J.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; López-Coto, R.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maier, G.; Malaguti, G.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Mangano, S.; Marcowith, A.; Martí, J.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Masuda, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Melioli, C.; Mineo, T.; Mirabal, N.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Mundell, C.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nemmen, R.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nosek, D.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Ostrowski, M.; Oya, I.; Padovani, M.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Paredes, J. M.; Pavy, S.; Pe'er, A.; Persic, M.; Petrucci, P.; Petruk, O.; Pisarski, A.; Pohl, M.; Porcelli, A.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Principe, G.; Prouza, M.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rameez, M.; Reimer, O.; Renaud, M.; Ribó, M.; Rico, J.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Rosado, J.; Rousselle, J.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Sadeh, I.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sanchez, D.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Sarkar, S.; Sawada, M.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schussler, F.; Sergijenko, O.; Servillat, M.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Sliusar, V.; Sol, H.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stephan, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takeda, J.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tokanai, F.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Townsley, C.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Tsujimoto, S.; Vagelli, V.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vassiliev, V.; Vecchi, M.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Vigorito, C.; Vorobiov, S.; Vrastil, M.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Wakely, S. P.; Walter, R.; Ward, J. E.; Watson, J. J.; Weinstein, A.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wilcox, P.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Wojcik, P.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zampieri, L.; Zanin, R.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 19 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2017-04-13
We perform simulations for future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) observations of RX~J1713.7$-$3946, a young supernova remnant (SNR) and one of the brightest sources ever discovered in very-high-energy (VHE) gamma rays. Special attention is paid to explore possible spatial (anti-)correlations of gamma rays with emission at other wavelengths, in particular X-rays and CO/H{\sc i} emission. We present a series of simulated images of RX J1713.7$-$3946 for CTA based on a set of observationally motivated models for the gamma-ray emission. In these models, VHE gamma rays produced by high-energy electrons are assumed to trace the non-thermal X-ray emission observed by {\it XMM-Newton}, whereas those originating from relativistic protons delineate the local gas distributions. The local atomic and molecular gas distributions are deduced by the NANTEN team from CO and H{\sc i} observations. Our primary goal is to show how one can distinguish the emission mechanism(s) of the gamma rays (i.e., hadronic vs leptonic, or a mixture of the two) through information provided by their spatial distribution, spectra, and time variation. This work is the first attempt to quantitatively evaluate the capabilities of CTA to achieve various proposed scientific goals by observing this important cosmic particle accelerator.
[45]  oai:arXiv.org:1701.02312  [pdf] - 1546346
The chemical enrichment of long-GRB nurseries up to z=2
Comments: 4 pages, 1 figure. Accepted for publication in A&A on 27/12/2016
Submitted: 2017-01-09
We investigate the existence of a metallicity threshold for the production of long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs). We used the host galaxies of the Swift/BAT6 sample of LGRBs. We considered the stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and metallicity determined from the host galaxy photometry and spectroscopy up to z = 2 and used them to compare the distribution of host galaxies to that of field galaxies in the mass-metallicity and fundamental metallicity relation plane. We find that although LGRBs also form in galaxies with relatively large stellar masses, the large majority of host galaxies have metallicities below log(O=H)~8.6. The extension to z = 2 results in a good sampling of stellar masses also above Log(Mstar/Msun)~9.5 and provides evidence that LGRB host galaxies do not follow the fundamental metallicity relation. As shown by the comparison with dedicated numerical simulations of LGRB host galaxy population, these results are naturally explained by the existence of a mild (~0.7 Zsun) threshold for the LGRB formation. The present statistics does not allow us to discriminate between different shapes of the metallicity cutoff, but the relatively high metallicity threshold found in this work is somewhat in disagreement to most of the standard single-star models for LGRB progenitors.
[46]  oai:arXiv.org:1604.08204  [pdf] - 1530644
The 999th Swift gamma-ray burst: Some like it thermal
Comments: 15 pages, 12 figures, 7 tables, accepted for publication A&A
Submitted: 2016-04-27, last modified: 2016-11-14
We present a multiwavelength study of GRB 151027A. This is the 999th GRB detected by the Swift satellite and it has a densely sampled emission in the X-ray and optical band and has been observed and detected in the radio up to 140 days after the prompt. The multiwavelength light curve from 500 s to 140 days can be modelled through a standard forward shock afterglow but requires an additional component to reproduce the early X-ray and optical emission. We present TNG and LBT optical observations performed 19.6, 33.9 and 92.3 days after the trigger which show a bump with respect to a standard afterglow flux decay and are possibly interpreted as due to the underlying SN and host galaxy (of 0.4 uJy in the R band). Radio observations, performed with SRT, Medicina, EVN and VLBA between day 4 and 140, suggest that the burst exploded in an environment characterised by a density profile scaling with the distance from the source (wind profile). A remarkable feature of the prompt emission is the presence of a bright flare 100 s after the trigger, lasting 70 seconds in the soft X-ray band, which was simultaneously detected from the optical band up to the MeV energy range. By combining Swift-BAT/XRT and Fermi-GBM data, the broadband (0.3-1000 keV) time resolved spectral analysis of the flare reveals the coexistence of a non-thermal (power law) and thermal blackbody components. The BB component contributes up to 35% of the luminosity in the 0.3-1000 keV band. The gamma-ray emission observed in Swift-BAT and Fermi-GBM anticipates and lasts less than the soft X-ray emission as observed by Swift-XRT, arguing against a Comptonization origin. The BB component could either be produced by an outflow becoming transparent or by the collision of a fast shell with a slow, heavy and optically thick fireball ejected during the quiescent time interval between the initial and later flares of the burst.
[47]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.06892  [pdf] - 1500539
The Deep and Transient Universe in the SVOM Era: New Challenges and Opportunities - Scientific prospects of the SVOM mission
Comments: 67 pages, 1 frontispiece, 21 figures. Report on the Scientific prospects of the SVOM mission. Proceedings of the Workshop held from 11th to 15th April 2016 at Les Houches School of Physics, France
Submitted: 2016-10-21
To take advantage of the astrophysical potential of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), Chinese and French astrophysicists have engaged the SVOM mission (Space-based multi-band astronomical Variable Objects Monitor). Major advances in GRB studies resulting from the synergy between space and ground observations, the SVOM mission implements space and ground instrumentation. The scientific objectives of the mission put a special emphasis on two categories of GRBs: very distant GRBs at z$>$5 which constitute exceptional cosmological probes, and faint/soft nearby GRBs which allow probing the nature of the progenitors and the physics at work in the explosion. These goals have a major impact on the design of the mission: the on-board hard X-ray imager is sensitive down to 4 keV and computes on line image and rate triggers, and the follow-up telescopes on the ground are sensitive in the NIR. At the beginning of the next decade, SVOM will be the main provider of GRB positions and spectral parameters on very short time scale. The SVOM instruments will operate simultaneously with a wide range of powerful astronomical devices. This rare instrumental conjunction, combined with the relevance of the scientific topics connected with GRB studies, warrants a remarkable scientific return for SVOM. In addition, the SVOM instrumentation, primarily designed for GRB studies, composes a unique multi-wavelength observatory with rapid slew capability that will find multiple applications for the whole astronomy community beyond the specific objectives linked to GRBs. This report lists the scientific themes that will benefit from observations made with SVOM, whether they are specific GRB topics, or more generally all the issues that can take advantage of the multi-wavelength capabilities of SVOM.
[48]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.05151  [pdf] - 1497663
Contributions of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) to the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, C.; Agnetta, G.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, J.; Alfaro, R.; Allafort, A. J.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Arezki, B.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, R.; Bird, T.; Bissaldi, E.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Boix, J.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnarel, F.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Braiding, C.; Brantseg, T.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Bron, S.; Brook, P.; Brooks, W.; Brown, A. M.; Brügge, K.; Brun, F.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cadoux, F.; Tovar, J. Calvo; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cauz, D.; Cavazzani, S.; Cerchiara, P.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chaleil, T.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colley, J. -M.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Cornat, R.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cuadra, J.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; Delgado, J.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Diaz, M. A.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domínguez, A.; Dominik, N.; Dominique, J. -L.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Ducci, L.; Dumas, D.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Egorov, A.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsaesser, D.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Fornasa, M.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galindo, D.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Galvez, J. A.; Gao, S.; Garcia, A.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, L.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Gerard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghislain, P.; Giammaria, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Gieras, T.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Girardot, P.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gomez, G.; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; Gora, D.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Huetten, M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Incorvaia, S.; Infante, L.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, D.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Jones, M.; Josselin, M.; Journet, L.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kamon, H.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Kato, S.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Kossatz, M.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuklis, M.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lahmann, R.; Lakicevic, M.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luigi, T.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Magniette, F.; Magniez, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, L.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Martynyuk-Lototskyy, K.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Merk, M.; Mertsch, P.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mientjes, P.; Mievre, I.; Mihailidis, A.; Miller, J.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Mohrmann, L.; Molinari, E.; Molyneux, P.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Munari, M.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Nanni, J.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Ocampo, C.; Occhipinti, G.; Ochoa, J. P.; de Bhroithe, A. OFaolain; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Öttl, S.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Pe'er, A.; Peet, S.; Pelat, D.; Pepato, A.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pieloth, D.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Pollo, A.; Porcelli, A.; Porthault, J.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Ravel, T.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reichardt, I.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Prado, R. Ribeiro; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Roache, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Rubini, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Saemann, E. O.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saggion, A.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salamon, A.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salgado, J.; Salina, G.; Salinas, L.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmid, J.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schullian, E. -M.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Shigenaka, A.; Shilon, I.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Simpson, H.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Sliusar, V.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, R.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Suomijärvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Talbot, G.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tanigawa, S.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Taylor, A.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thornhill, J.; Thoudam, S.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Viaux, N.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; von Brand, H.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vu, L. V.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warren, D.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J. J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Wilson, N.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Winter, M.; Wischnewski, R.; Witt, E.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings for the Gamma 2016, Heidelberg, Germany
Submitted: 2016-10-17
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) Consortium presented at the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016), July 11-15, 2016, in Heidelberg, Germany.
[49]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.07875  [pdf] - 1498370
Short GRBs at the dawn of the gravitational wave era
Comments: 13 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics. Figure 5 and angle ranges corrected in revised version
Submitted: 2016-07-26, last modified: 2016-09-06
We derive the luminosity function and redshift distribution of short Gamma Ray Bursts (SGRBs) using (i) all the available observer-frame constraints (i.e. peak flux, fluence, peak energy and duration distributions) of the large population of Fermi SGRBs and (ii) the rest-frame properties of a complete sample of Swift SGRBs. We show that a steep $\phi(L)\propto L^{-a}$ with a>2.0 is excluded if the full set of constraints is considered. We implement a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method to derive the $\phi(L)$ and $\psi(z)$ functions assuming intrinsic Ep-Liso and Ep-Eiso correlations or independent distributions of intrinsic peak energy, luminosity and duration. To make our results independent from assumptions on the progenitor (NS-NS binary mergers or other channels) and from uncertainties on the star formation history, we assume a parametric form for the redshift distribution of SGRBs. We find that a relatively flat luminosity function with slope ~0.5 below a characteristic break luminosity ~3$\times10^{52}$ erg/s and a redshift distribution of SGRBs peaking at z~1.5-2 satisfy all our constraints. These results hold also if no Ep-Liso and Ep-Eiso correlations are assumed. We estimate that, within ~200 Mpc (i.e. the design aLIGO range for the detection of GW produced by NS-NS merger events), 0.007-0.03 SGRBs yr$^{-1}$ should be detectable as gamma-ray events. Assuming current estimates of NS-NS merger rates and that all NS-NS mergers lead to a SGRB event, we derive a conservative estimate of the average opening angle of SGRBs: $\theta_{jet}$~3-6 deg. Our luminosity function implies an average luminosity L~1.5$\times 10^{52}$ erg/s, nearly two orders of magnitude higher than previous findings, which greatly enhances the chance of observing SGRB "orphan" afterglows. Efforts should go in the direction of finding and identifying such orphan afterglows as counterparts of GW events.
[50]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.01045  [pdf] - 1490774
Taking stock of SLSN and LGRB host galaxy comparison using a complete sample of LGRBs
Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures, accepted to Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2016-07-04
Long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) and superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) are both explosive transients with very massive progenitor stars. Clues about the nature of the progenitors can be found by investigating environments in which such transients occur. While studies of LGRB host galaxies have a long history, dedicated observational campaigns have only recently resulted in a high enough number of photometrically and spectroscopically observed SLSN hosts to allow statistically significant analysis of their properties. In this paper we make a comparison of the host galaxies of hydrogen-poor (H-poor) SLSNe and the Swift/BAT6 sample of LGRBs. In contrast to previous studies we use a complete sample of LGRBs and we address a special attention to the comparison methodology and the selection of SLSN sample whose data have been compiled from the available literature. At intermediate redshifts (0.3 < z < 0.7) the two classes of transients select galaxies whose properties (stellar mass, luminosity, star-formation rate, specific star-formation rate and metallicity) do not differ on average significantly. Moreover, the host galaxies of both classes of objects follow the fundamental metallicity relation and the fundamental plane of metallicity. In contrast to previous studies we show that at intermediate redshifts the emission line equivalent widths of the two populations are essentially the same and that the previous claims regarding the higher fraction of SLSN hosts among the extreme emission line galaxies with respect to LGRBs are mostly due to a larger fraction of strong-line emitters among SLSN hosts at z < 0.3, where samples of LGRB hosts are small and poorly defined.
[51]  oai:arXiv.org:1606.03876  [pdf] - 1447799
Searching for narrow absorption and emission lines in XMM-Newton spectra of gamma-ray bursts
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2016-06-13
We present the results of a spectroscopic search for narrow emission and absorption features in the X-ray spectra of long gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows. Using XMM-Newton data, both EPIC and RGS spectra, of six bright (fluence >10^{-7} erg cm^{-2}) and relatively nearby (z=0.54-1.41) GRBs, we performed a blind search for emission or absorption lines that could be related to a high cloud density or metal-rich gas in the environ close to the GRBs. We detected five emission features in four of the six GRBs with an overall statistical significance, assessed through Monte Carlo simulations, of <3.0 sigma. Most of the lines are detected around the observed energy of the oxygen edge at ~0.5 keV, suggesting that they are not related to the GRB environment but are most likely of Galactic origin. No significant absorption features were detected. A spectral fitting with a free Galactic column density (N_H) testing different models for the Galactic absorption confirms this origin because we found an indication of an excess of Galactic N_H in these four GRBs with respect to the tabulated values.
[52]  oai:arXiv.org:1604.01034  [pdf] - 1415174
Are LGRBs biased tracers of star formation? Clues from the host galaxies of the Swift/BAT6 complete sample of bright LGRBs. II: star formation rates and metallicities at z < 1
Comments: 15 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2016-04-04
Long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) are associated with the deaths of massive stars and could thus be a potentially powerful tool to trace cosmic star formation. However, especially at low redshifts (z < 1.5) LGRBs seem to prefer particular types of environment. Our aim is to study the host galaxies of a complete sample of bright LGRBs to investigate the impact of the environment on GRB formation. We study host galaxy spectra of the Swift/BAT6 complete sample of 14 z < 1 bright LGRBs. We use the detected nebular emission lines to measure the dust extinction, star formation rate (SFR) and nebular metallicity (Z) of the hosts and supplement the data set with previously measured stellar masses M$_{\star}$. The distributions of the obtained properties and their interrelations (e.g. mass-metallicity and SFR-M$_{\star}$ relations) are compared to samples of field star-forming galaxies.We find that LGRB hosts at z < 1 have on average lower SFRs than if they were direct star-formation tracers. By directly comparing metallicity distributions of LGRB hosts and star-forming galaxies, we find a good match between the two populations up to Z $\sim 8.4-8.5$, after which the paucity of metal-rich LGRB hosts becomes apparent. The LGRB host galaxies of our complete sample are not inconsistent with the mass-metallicity relation at similar mean redshift and stellar masses. The cutoff against high metallicities (and high masses) can explain the low SFR values of LGRB hosts. We find a hint of increased incidence of starburst galaxies in the Swift/BAT6 z < 1 sample with respect to that of a field star-forming population. Given that the SFRs are low on average, the latter is ascribed to low stellar masses. Nevertheless the limits on the completeness and metallicity availability of current surveys, coupled with the limited number of LGRB host galaxies, prevent us from reaching more quantitative conclusions.
[53]  oai:arXiv.org:1602.00770  [pdf] - 1523090
Long-Duration Gamma-Ray Burst Host Galaxies in Emission and Absorption
Comments: Invited review accepted to SSR. Part of a special edition on gamma-ray bursts accompanying the ISSI-Beijing workshop, "Gamma-Ray Bursts: A Tool to Explore the Young Universe"
Submitted: 2016-02-01
The galaxy population hosting long-duration GRBs provides a means to constrain the progenitor and an opportunity to use these violent explosions to characterize the nature of the high-redshift universe. Studies of GRB host galaxies in emission reveal a population of star-forming galaxies with great diversity, spanning a wide range of masses, metallicities, and redshifts. However, as a population GRB hosts are significantly less massive and poorer in metals than the hosts of other core-collapse transients, suggesting that GRB production is only efficient at metallicities significantly below Solar. GRBs may also prefer compact galaxies, and dense and/or central regions of galaxies, more than other types of core-collapse explosion. Meanwhile, studies of hosts in absorption against the luminous GRB optical afterglow provide a unique means of unveiling properties of the ISM in even the faintest and most distant galaxies; these observations are helping to constrain the chemical evolution of galaxies and the properties of interstellar dust out to very high redshifts. New ground- and space-based instrumentation, and the accumulation of larger and more carefully-selected samples, are continually enhancing our view of the GRB host population.
[54]  oai:arXiv.org:1505.06743  [pdf] - 1282690
GRB hosts through cosmic time - VLT/X-Shooter emission-line spectroscopy of 96 GRB-selected galaxies at 0.1 < z < 3.6
Comments: 33 pages, 21 figures, published in A&A 581, A125 (2015)
Submitted: 2015-05-25, last modified: 2015-09-24
[Abridged] We present data and initial results from VLT/X-Shooter emission-line spectroscopy of 96 GRB-selected galaxies at 0.1<z<3.6, the largest sample of GRB host spectroscopy available to date. Most of our GRBs were detected by Swift and 76% are at 0.5<z<2.5 with a median z~1.6. Based on Balmer and/or forbidden lines of oxygen, nitrogen, and neon, we measure systemic redshifts, star formation rates (SFRs), visual attenuations, oxygen abundances (12+log(O/H)), and emission-line widths. We find a strong change of the typical physical properties of GRB hosts with redshift. The median SFR, for example, increases from ~0.6 M_sun/yr at z~0.6 up to ~15 M_sun/yr at z~2. A higher ratio of [OIII]/[OII] at higher redshifts leads to an increasing distance of GRB-selected galaxies to the locus of local galaxies in the BPT diagram. Oxygen abundances of the galaxies are distributed between 12+log(O/H)=7.9 and 12+log(O/H)=9.0 with a median of 12+log(O/H)~8.5. The fraction of GRB-selected galaxies with super-solar metallicities is around 20% at z<1 in the adopted metallicity scale. This is significantly less than the fraction of star formation in similar galaxies, illustrating that GRBs are scarce in high-metallicity environments. At z~3, sensitivity limits us to probing only the most luminous GRB hosts for which we derive metallicities of Z ~< 0.5 Z_sun. Together with a high incidence of galaxies with similar metallicity in our sample at z~1.5, this indicates that the metallicity dependence observed at low redshift will not be dominant at z~3.
[55]  oai:arXiv.org:1508.05894  [pdf] - 1275515
CTA Contributions to the 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2015)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Actis, M.; Agnetta, G.; Aguilar, J. A.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, R.; Aliu, E.; Allafort, A. J.; Allan, D.; Allekotte, I.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arnaldi, H.; Arnold, L.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Asorey, H. G.; Aune, T.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barceló, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Baushev, A.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Billotta, S.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, T.; Birsin, E.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Bigas, O. Blanch; Blasi, P.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Gargallo, J. Boix; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Bottani, A.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Braiding, C.; Brandt, L.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Bretz, T.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Brocato, E.; Brook, P.; Brown, A. M.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Bryan, M.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cameron, R.; Camprecios, J.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Cantu, S.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carmona, E.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Caruso, R.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cavazzani, S.; Cazaux, S.; Cefalà, M.; Cerchiara, P.; Cereda, M.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Champion, C.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Cheimets, P.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Cillis, A.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Compin, M.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De La Vega, G. A.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Depaola, G.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Sciascio, G.; Díaz, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Diez, V.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domainko, W.; Dominik, N.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Dumas, D.; Dumm, J.; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Echaniz, J. C.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Errando, M.; Eschbach, S.; Etchegoyen, A.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falcone, A.; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Farrell, S.; Fasola, G.; Fegan, S.; Feinstein, F.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez, A.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Curcoll, R. Firpo; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Forest, F.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Frankowski, A.; Frega, N.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galante, N.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Gao, S.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, D.; Garrido, L.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Geffroy, N.; Gérard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghigo, M.; Ghislain, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Berisso, M. Gomez; Vargas, G. A. Gomez; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; González, F.; Muñoz, A. González; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Grandi, P.; Grañena, F.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hahn, J.; Hakansson, N.; Heras, N. Hamer; Hanabata, Y.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Harris, J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hoard, D.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Hofverberg, P.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J. R.; Hormigos, S.; Horns, D.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Hütten, M.; Humensky, T. B.; Huovelin, J.; Huppert, J. -F.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Idźkowski, B.; Ikawa, D.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Incorvaia, S.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jeanney, C.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Journet, L.; Juffroy, C.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P. E.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kaufmann, S.; Kawanaka, N.; Kawashima, T.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kellner-Leidel, B.; Kendziorra, E.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kisaka, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kodakkadan, A.; Kodani, K.; Kohri, K.; Kojima, T.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Koul, R.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kushida, J.; Kuznetsov, A.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lagadec, T.; Lahmann, R.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Languignon, D.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Latovski, N.; Law-Green, D.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Loiseau, D.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Longo, G.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; López-Coto, R.; López-Oramas, A.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Lu, C. -C.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Luz, O.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Maltezos, S.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Marszałek, A.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Marx, R.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazureau, E.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCann, A.; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; McKay, R.; McKinney, K.; Meagher, K.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melo, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Mertsch, P.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michałowski, J.; Micolon, P.; Mientjes, P.; Mignot, S.; Mihailidis, A.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mistò, A.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Molinari, E.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Moore, P.; Olaizola, A. Moralejo; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mrusek, I.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar-Adrover, P.; Mundell, C.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neustroev, V.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Occhipinti, G.; de Bhroithe, A. O'Faolain; Ogino, M.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Otero, L. A.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Arribas, M. Paz; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Peet, S.; Pelassa, V.; Pelat, D.; Peres, C.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pichel, A.; Pieloth, D.; Pierbattista, M.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pita, S.; Planes, A.; Platino, M.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Ponz, J. D.; Porcelli, A.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Preece, R.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Proyetti, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Racero, E.; Räck, T.; Rafalski, J.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Rateau, S.; Ravel, T.; Ravignani, D.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reitberger, K.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Rettig, R.; Reville, B.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Ringegni, P.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivière, A.; Rivoire, S.; Roache, E.; Rodeghiero, G.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rogers, T.; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Rodriguez, M. P. Romay; Romeo, G.; Romero, G. E.; Roncadelli, M.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rossiter, P.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Różańska, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Saemann, E. O.; Saggion, A.; Saha, L.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, K.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Salgado, J.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez, F.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schafer, J.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schlickeiser, R.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schultz, C.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Pandeni, K. Shiningayamwe; Shukla, A.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Slyusar, V.; Smith, A.; Smith, J.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, D.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamatescu, V.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Straumann, U.; Strazzeri, E.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, H.; Talbot, G.; Tammi, J.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tarantino, E.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrier, R.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thomas, V.; Thornhill, J.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tibolla, O.; Tiengo, A.; Tijsseling, G.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toscano, S.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Townsley, C.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsubone, Y.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Underwood, C.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Vallania, P.; Vallejo, G.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vicha, J.; Videla, M.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Vogler, P.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vu, L. V.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R. M.; Wagner, R. G.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warwick, R.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weinstein, A.; Weitzel, Q.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Werner, M.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Wischnewski, R.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yebras, J. M.; Yelos, D.; Yeung, W.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zabalza, V.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zurbach, C.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings at the ICRC2015, The Hague (The Netherlands). v1: placeholder with no arXiv links yet, to be replaced once individual contributions have been all submitted; v2: final with arXiv links to all CTA contributions and full author list
Submitted: 2015-08-24, last modified: 2015-09-11
List of contributions from the CTA Consortium presented at the 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference, 30 July - 6 August 2015, The Hague, The Netherlands.
[56]  oai:arXiv.org:1508.03094  [pdf] - 1292268
Massive stars formed in atomic hydrogen reservoirs: HI observations of gamma-ray burst host galaxies
Comments: Accepted to A&A. 16 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables
Submitted: 2015-08-12
Long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), among the most energetic events in the Universe, are explosions of massive and short-lived stars, so they pinpoint locations of recent star formation. However, several GRB host galaxies have recently been found to be deficient in molecular gas (H2), believed to be the fuel of star formation. Moreover, optical spectroscopy of GRB afterglows implies that the molecular phase constitutes only a small fraction of the gas along the GRB line-of-sight. Here we report the first ever 21 cm line observations of GRB host galaxies, using the Australia Telescope Compact Array, implying high levels of atomic hydrogen (HI), which suggests that the connection between atomic gas and star formation is stronger than previously thought, with star formation being potentially directly fuelled by atomic gas (or with very efficient HI-to-H2 conversion and rapid exhaustion of molecular gas), as has been theoretically shown to be possible. This can happen in low metallicity gas near the onset of star formation, because cooling of gas (necessary for star formation) is faster than the HI-to-H2 conversion. Indeed, large atomic gas reservoirs, together with low molecular gas masses, stellar and dust masses are consistent with GRB hosts being preferentially galaxies which have very recently started a star formation episode after accreting metal-poor gas from the intergalactic medium. This provides a natural route for forming GRBs in low-metallicity environments. The gas inflow scenario is also consistent with the existence of the companion HI object with no optical counterpart ~19 kpc from the GRB 060505 host, and with the fact that the HI centroids of the GRB 980425 and 060505 hosts do not coincide with optical centres of these galaxies, but are located close to the GRB positions.
[57]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.7064  [pdf] - 1278764
Are LGRBs biased tracers of star formation? Clues from the host galaxies of the Swift/BAT6 complete sample of LGRBs. I: Stellar mass at z<1
Comments: 9 pages (+ Appendix: 5 pages), 7 figures, A&A in press
Submitted: 2014-09-24, last modified: 2015-07-16
LGRBs are associated with massive stars and are therefore linked to star formation. The conditions necessary to produce LGRBs can affect the relation between the LGRB rate and star formation. By using the power of a complete LGRB sample, our aim is to understand whether such a bias exists and, if it does, what is its origin. In this first paper, we build the SED of the z<1 host galaxies of the BAT6 LGRB sample, and determine their stellar masses from SED fitting. We compare the resulting stellar mass distribution (i) with star-forming galaxies observed in deep surveys (UltraVISTA); (ii) with semi-analitical models of the z<1 star forming galaxy population and (iii) with numerical simulations of LGRB hosts having different metallicity thresholds for the progenitor star environment. We find that at z<1 LGRBs tend to avoid massive galaxies and are powerful in selecting faint low-mass star-forming galaxies. The stellar mass distribution of the hosts is not consistent with that of the UltraVISTA star-forming galaxies weighted for their SFR. This implies that, at least at z<1, LGRBs are not unbiased tracers of star formation. To make the two distributions consistent, a much steeper faint-end of the mass function would be required, or a very shallow SFR-Mass relation for the low mass galaxy population. GRB host galaxy simulations indicates that, to reproduce the stellar mass distribution, a metallicity threshold of the order of Z_th=0.3-0.5Z_sun is necessary. Models without a metallicity threshold or with an extreme threshold of Z_th = 0.1Z_sun are excluded at z<1. The use of the BAT6 complete sample makes this result not affected by possible biases which could have influenced past results based on incomplete samples. The preference for low metallicities (Z<~0.5Z_sun) can be a consequence of the particular conditions needed for the progenitor star to produce a GRB. (Abridged)
[58]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.07791  [pdf] - 1244301
GRB host galaxies with VLT/X-Shooter: properties at 0.8 < z < 1.3
Comments: 13 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-06-25, last modified: 2015-07-10
Long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) are associated with the death of massive stars. Their host galaxies therefore represent a unique class of objects tracing star formation across the observable Universe. Indeed, recently accumulated evidence shows that GRB hosts do not differ substantially from general population of galaxies at high (z > 2) redshifts. However, it has been long recognised that the properties of z < 1.5 hosts, compared to general star-forming population, are unusual. To better understand the reasons for the supposed difference in LGRB hosts properties at z < 1.5, we obtained VLT/X- Shooter spectra of six hosts lying in the redshift range of 0.8 < z < 1.3. Some of these hosts have been observed before, yet we still lack well constrained information on their characteristics such as metallicity, dust extinction and star formation rate. We search for emission lines in the VLT/X-Shooter spectra of the hosts and measure their fluxes. We perform a detailed analysis, estimating host average extinction, star-formation rates, metallicities and electron densities where possible. Measured quantities of our hosts are compared to a larger sample of previously observed GRB hosts at z < 2. Star-formation rates and metallicities are measured for all the hosts analyzed in this paper and metallicities are well determined for 4 hosts. The mass-metallicity relation, the fundamental metallicity relation and SFRs derived from our hosts occupy similar parameter space as other host galaxies investigated so-far at the same redshift. We therefore conclude that GRB hosts in our sample support the found discrepancy between the properties of low-redshift GRB hosts and the general population of star- forming galaxies.
[59]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.4804  [pdf] - 1265605
VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of the afterglow of the Swift GRB 130606A: Chemical abundances and reionisation at $z\sim6$
Comments: 15 pages, 12 figures
Submitted: 2014-09-16, last modified: 2015-07-09
The reionisation of the Universe is thought to have ended around z~6, as inferred from spectroscopy of distant bright background sources, such as quasars (QSO) and gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows. Furthermore, spectroscopy of a GRB afterglow provides insight in its host galaxy, which is often too dim and distant to study otherwise. We present the high S/N VLT/X-shooter spectrum of GRB130606A at z=5.913. We aim to measure the degree of ionisation of the IGM between 5.02<z<5.84 and to study the chemical abundance pattern and dust content of its host galaxy. We measured the flux decrement due to absorption at Ly$\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ wavelength regions. The hydrogen and metal absorption lines formed in the host galaxy were fitted with Voigt profiles to obtain column densities. Our measurements of the Ly$\alpha$-forest optical depth are consistent with previous measurements of QSOs, but have a much smaller uncertainty. The analysis of the red damping wing yields a neutral fraction $x_{HI}<0.05$ (3$\sigma$). We obtain column density measurements of several elements. The ionisation corrections due to the GRB is estimated to be negligible (<0.03 dex), but larger corrections may apply due to the pre-existing radiation field (up to 0.4 dex based on sub-DLA studies). Our measurements confirm that the Universe is already predominantly ionised over the redshift range probed in this work, but was slightly more neutral at z>5.6. GRBs are useful probes of the ionisation state of the IGM in the early Universe, but because of internal scatter we need a larger statistical sample to draw robust conclusions. The high [Si/Fe] in the host can be due to dust depletion, alpha-element enhancement, or a combination of both. The very high value of [Al/Fe]=2.40+/-0.78 might connected to the stellar population history. We estimate the host metallicity to be -1.7<[M/H]<-0.9 (2%-13% of solar). (trunc.)
[60]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.05463  [pdf] - 1358792
The rate and luminosity function of long Gamma Ray Bursts
Comments: 9 pages, 3 figures, 1 table. Submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysics
Submitted: 2015-06-17
We derive, adopting a direct method, the luminosity function and the formation rate of long Gamma Ray Bursts through a complete, flux-limited, sample of Swift bursts which has a high level of completeness in redshift z (~82%). We parametrise the redshift evolution of the GRB luminosity as L = L_0(1+ z)^k and we derive k = 2.5, consistently with recent estimates. The de-evolved luminosity function of GRBs can be represented by a broken power law with slopes a = -1.32 +- 0.21 and b = -1.84 +- 0.24 below and above, respectively, a characteristic break luminosity L_0,b = 10^51.45+-0.15 erg/s. Under the hypothesis of luminosity evolution we find that the GRB formation rate increases with redshift up to z~2, where it peaks, and then decreases in agreement with the shape of the cosmic star formation rate. We test the direct method through numerical simulations and we show that if it is applied to incomplete (both in redshift and/or flux) GRB samples it can misleadingly result in an excess of the GRB formation rate at low redshifts.
[61]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.03079  [pdf] - 1273148
The high-redshift gamma-ray burst GRB140515A
Comments: 10 pages, 8 figures, 5 tables, submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2015-06-09
High-redshift gamma-ray bursts have several advantages for the study of the distant universe, providing unique information about the structure and properties of the galaxies in which they exploded. Spectroscopic identification with large ground-based telescopes has improved our knowledge of the class of such distant events. We present the multi-wavelength analysis of the high-$z$ Swift gamma-ray burst GRB140515A ($z = 6.327$). The best estimate of the neutral hydrogen fraction of the intergalactic medium (IGM) towards the burst is $x_{HI} \leq 0.002$. The spectral absorption lines detected for this event are the weakest lines ever observed in gamma-ray burst afterglows, suggesting that GRB140515A exploded in a very low density environment. Its circum-burst medium is characterised by an average extinction (A$_{\rm V} \sim 0.1$) that seems to be typical of $z \ge 6$ events. The observed multi-band light curves are explained either with a very flat injected spectrum ($p = 1.7$) or with a multi-component emission ($p = 2.1$). In the second case a long-lasting central engine activity is needed in order to explain the late time X-ray emission. The possible origin of GRB140515A from a Pop III (or from a Pop II stars with local environment enriched by Pop III) massive star is unlikely.
[62]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.6315  [pdf] - 1449744
The warm, the excited, and the molecular gas: GRB 121024A shining through its star-forming galaxy
Comments: 20 pages, 11 figures, accepted by MNRAS
Submitted: 2014-09-22, last modified: 2015-05-10
We present the first reported case of the simultaneous metallicity determination of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) host galaxy, from both afterglow absorption lines as well as strong emission-line diagnostics. Using spectroscopic and imaging observations of the afterglow and host of the long-duration Swift GRB121024A at z = 2.30, we give one of the most complete views of a GRB host/environment to date. We observe a strong damped Ly-alpha absorber (DLA) with a hydrogen column density of log N(HI) = 21.88 +/- 0.10, H2 absorption in the Lyman-Werner bands (molecular fraction of log(f)~ -1.4; fourth solid detection of molecular hydrogen in a GRB-DLA), the nebular emission lines H-alpha, H-beta, [O II], [O III] and [N II], as well as metal absorption lines. We find a GRB host galaxy that is highly star-forming (SFR ~ 40 solar masses/yr ), with a dust-corrected metallicity along the line of sight of [Zn/H]corr = -0.6 +/- 0.2 ([O/H] ~ -0.3 from emission lines), and a depletion factor [Zn/Fe] = 0.85 +/- 0.04. The molecular gas is separated by 400 km/s (and 1-3 kpc) from the gas that is photoexcited by the GRB. This implies a fairly massive host, in agreement with the derived stellar mass of log(M/M_solar ) = 9.9+/- 0.2. We dissect the host galaxy by characterising its molecular component, the excited gas, and the line-emitting star-forming regions. The extinction curve for the line of sight is found to be unusually flat (Rv ~15). We discuss the possibility of an anomalous grain size distributions. We furthermore discuss the different metallicity determinations from both absorption and emission lines, which gives consistent results for the line of sight to GRB 121024A.
[63]  oai:arXiv.org:1504.02096  [pdf] - 1129080
Unveiling the population of orphan Gamma Ray Bursts
Comments: 9 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication by Astronomy and Astrophysics
Submitted: 2015-04-08
Gamma Ray Bursts are detectable in the gamma-ray band if their jets are oriented towards the observer. However, for each GRB with a typical theta_jet, there should be ~2/theta_jet^2 bursts whose emission cone is oriented elsewhere in space. These off-axis bursts can be eventually detected when, due to the deceleration of their relativistic jets, the beaming angle becomes comparable to the viewing angle. Orphan Afterglows (OA) should outnumber the current population of bursts detected in the gamma-ray band even if they have not been conclusively observed so far at any frequency. We compute the expected flux of the population of orphan afterglows in the mm, optical and X-ray bands through a population synthesis code of GRBs and the standard afterglow emission model. We estimate the detection rate of OA by on-going and forthcoming surveys. The average duration of OA as transients above a given limiting flux is derived and described with analytical expressions: in general OA should appear as daily transients in optical surveys and as monthly/yearly transients in the mm/radio band. We find that ~ 2 OA yr^-1 could already be detected by Gaia and up to 20 OA yr^-1 could be observed by the ZTF survey. A larger number of 50 OA yr^-1 should be detected by LSST in the optical band. For the X-ray band, ~ 26 OA yr^-1 could be detected by the eROSITA. For the large population of OA detectable by LSST, the X-ray and optical follow up of the light curve (for the brightest cases) and/or the extensive follow up of their emission in the mm and radio band could be the key to disentangle their GRB nature from other extragalactic transients of comparable flux density.
[64]  oai:arXiv.org:1503.03623  [pdf] - 1450544
Spectrophotometric analysis of GRB afterglow extinction curves with X-shooter
Comments: 17 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2015-03-12
In this work we use gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow spectra observed with the VLT/X-shooter spectrograph to measure rest-frame extinction in GRB lines-of-sight by modeling the broadband near-infrared (NIR) to X-ray afterglow spectral energy distributions (SEDs). Our sample consists of nine Swift GRBs, eight of them belonging to the long-duration and one to the short-duration class. Dust is modeled using the average extinction curves of the Milky Way and the two Magellanic Clouds. We derive the rest-frame extinction of the entire sample, which fall in the range $0 \lesssim {\it A}_{\rm V} \lesssim 1.2$. Moreover, the SMC extinction curve is the preferred extinction curve template for the majority of our sample, a result which is in agreement with those commonly observed in GRB lines-of-sights. In one analysed case (GRB 120119A), the common extinction curve templates fail to reproduce the observed extinction. To illustrate the advantage of using the high-quality X-shooter afterglow SEDs over the photometric SEDs, we repeat the modeling using the broadband SEDs with the NIR-to-UV photometric measurements instead of the spectra. The main result is that the spectroscopic data, thanks to a combination of excellent resolution and coverage of the blue part of the SED, are more successful in constraining the extinction curves and therefore the dust properties in GRB hosts with respect to photometric measurements. In all cases but one the extinction curve of one template is preferred over the others. We show that the modeled values of the extinction and the spectral slope, obtained through spectroscopic and photometric SED analysis, can differ significantly for individual events. Finally we stress that, regardless of the resolution of the optical-to-NIR data, the SED modeling gives reliable results only when the fit is performed on a SED covering a broader spectral region.
[65]  oai:arXiv.org:1502.02676  [pdf] - 1224375
Accessing the population of high redshift Gamma Ray Bursts
Comments: 12 pages, 12 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-02-09
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are a powerful probe of the high redshift Universe. We present a tool to estimate the detection rate of high-z GRBs by a generic detector with defined energy band and sensitivity. We base this on a population model that reproduces the observed properties of GRBs detected by Swift, Fermi and CGRO in the hard X-ray and gamma-ray bands. We provide the expected cumulative distributions of the flux and fluence of simulated GRBs in different energy bands. We show that scintillator detectors, operating at relatively high energies (e.g. tens of keV to the MeV), can detect only the most luminous GRBs at high redshifts due to the link between the peak spectral energy and the luminosity (Ep-Liso) of GRBs. We show that the best strategy for catching the largest number of high-z bursts is to go softer (e.g. in the soft X-ray band) but with a very high sensitivity. For instance, an imaging soft X-ray detector operating in the 0.2-5 keV energy band reaching a sensitivity, corresponding to a fluence of ~10^-8 erg cm^-2, is expected to detect ~40 GRBs yr^-1 sr^-1 at z>5 (~3 GRBs yr^-1 sr^-1 at z>10). Once high-z GRBs are detected the principal issue is to secure their redshift. To this aim we estimate their NIR afterglow flux at relatively early times and evaluate the effectiveness of following them up and construct usable samples of events with any forthcoming GRB mission dedicated to explore the high-z Universe.
[66]  oai:arXiv.org:1410.5216  [pdf] - 1222656
Comparing the spectral lag of short and long gamma-ray bursts and its relation with the luminosity
Comments: 11 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2014-10-20
We investigated the rest frame spectral lags of two complete samples of bright long (50) and short (6) gamma-ray bursts (GRB) detected by Swift. We analysed the Swift/BAT data through a discrete cross-correlation function (CCF) fitted with an asymmetric Gaussian function to estimate the lag and the associated uncertainty. We find that half of the long GRBs have a positive lag and half a lag consistent with zero. All short GRBs have lags consistent with zero. The distributions of the spectral lags for short and long GRBs have different average values. Limited by the small number of short GRBs, we cannot exclude at more than 2 sigma significance level that the two distributions of lags are drawn from the same parent population. If we consider the entire sample of long GRBs, we do not find evidence for a lag-luminosity correlation, rather the lag-luminosity plane appears filled on the left hand side, thus suggesting that the lag-luminosity correlation could be a boundary. Short GRBs are consistent with the long ones in the lag-luminosity plane.
[67]  oai:arXiv.org:1410.0489  [pdf] - 875511
Circular polarization in the optical afterglow of GRB 121024A
Comments: Published as Wiersema et al. 2014, Nature 509, 201-204. This is the version prior to final editing; please see official published version for the final version and higher quality images
Submitted: 2014-10-02
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are most probably powered by collimated relativistic outflows (jets) from accreting black holes at cosmological distances. Bright afterglows are produced when the outflow collides with the ambient medium. Afterglow polarization directly probes the magnetic properties of the jet, when measured minutes after the burst, and the geometric properties of the jet and the ambient medium when measured hours to days after the burst. High values of optical polarization detected minutes after burst in GRB 120308A indicate the presence of large-scale ordered magnetic fields originating from the central engine (the power source of the GRB). Theoretical models predict low degrees of linear polarization and negligable circular polarization at late times, when the energy in the original ejecta is quickly transferred to the ambient medium and propagates farther into the medium as a blastwave. Here we report the detection of circularly polarized optical light in the afterglow of GRB 121024A, measured 0.15 days after the burst. We show that the circular polarization is intrinsic to the afterglow and unlikely to be produced by dust scattering or plasma propagation effects. A possible explanation is to invoke anisotropic (rather than the commonly assumed isotropic) electron pitch angle distributions, and we suggest that new models are required to produce the complex microphysics of realistic shocks in relativistic jets.
[68]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.4975  [pdf] - 903745
The mysterious optical afterglow spectrum of GRB140506A at z=0.889
Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures. Accepted for publications in A&A
Submitted: 2014-09-17, last modified: 2014-09-18
Context. Gamma-ray burst (GRBs) afterglows probe sightlines to star-forming regions in distant star-forming galaxies. Here we present a study of the peculiar afterglow spectrum of the z = 0.889 Swift GRB 140506A. Aims. Our aim is to understand the origin of the very unusual properties of the absorption along the line-of-sight. Methods. We analyse spectroscopic observations obtained with the X-shooter spectrograph mounted on the ESO/VLT at two epochs 8.8 h and 33 h after the burst as well as imaging from the GROND instrument. We also present imaging and spectroscopy of the host galaxy obtained with the Magellan telescope. Results. The underlying afterglow appears to be a typical afterglow of a long-duration GRB. However, the material along the line-of- sight has imprinted very unusual features on the spectrum. Firstly, there is a very broad and strong flux drop below 8000 AA (4000 AA in the rest frame), which seems to be variable between the two spectroscopic epochs. We can reproduce the flux-drops both as a giant 2175 AA extinction bump and as an effect of multiple scattering on dust grains in a dense environment. Secondly, we detect absorption lines from excited H i and He i. We also detect molecular absorption from CH+ . Conclusions. We interpret the unusual properties of these spectra as reflecting the presence of three distinct regions along the line-of-sight: the excited He i absorption originates from an H ii-region, whereas the Balmer absorption must originate from an associated photodissociation region. The strong metal line and molecular absorption and the dust extinction must originate from a third, cooler region along the line-of-sight. The presence of (at least) three separate regions is reflected in the fact that the different absorption components have different velocities relative to the systemic redshift of the host galaxy.
[69]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.0017  [pdf] - 903669
A quiescent galaxy at the position of the long GRB 050219A
Comments: 11 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables; accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2014-08-29
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) are produced by the collapse of very massive stars. Due to the short lifetime of their progenitors, LGRBs pinpoint star-forming galaxies. We present here a multi-band search for the host galaxy of the long dark GRB 050219A within the enhanced Swift/XRT error circle. We used spectroscopic observations acquired with VLT/X-shooter to determine the redshift and star-formation rate of the putative host galaxy. We compared the results with the optical/IR spectral energy distribution obtained with different facilities. Surprisingly, the host galaxy is a old and quiescent early-type galaxy at z = 0.211 characterised by an unprecedentedly low specific star-formation rate. It is the first LGRB host to be also an early-type post-starburst galaxy. This is further evidence that GRBs can explode in all kind of galaxies, with the only requirement being an episode of star-formation.
[70]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.5076  [pdf] - 1216454
Herschel observations of gamma-ray burst host galaxies: implications for the topology of the dusty interstellar medium
Comments: 14 pages, 7 figures. Accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2014-08-21
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are indisputably related to star formation, and their vast luminosity in gamma rays pin-points regions of star formation independent of galaxy mass. As such, GRBs provide a unique tool for studying star forming galaxies out to high-z independent of luminosity. Most of our understanding of the properties of GRB hosts (GRBHs) comes from optical and near-infrared (NIR) follow-up observations, and we therefore have relatively little knowledge of the fraction of dust-enshrouded star formation that resides within GRBHs. Currently ~20% of GRBs show evidence of significant amounts of dust along the line of sight to the afterglow through the host galaxy, and these GRBs tend to reside within redder and more massive galaxies than GRBs with optically bright afterglows. In this paper we present Herschel observations of five GRBHs with evidence of being dust-rich, targeted to understand the dust attenuation properties within GRBs better. Despite the sensitivity of our Herschel observations, only one galaxy in our sample was detected (GRBH 070306), for which we measure a total star formation rate (SFR) of ~100Mstar/yr, and which had a relatively high stellar mass (log[Mstar]=10.34+0.09/-0.04). Nevertheless, when considering a larger sample of GRBHs observed with Herschel, it is clear that stellar mass is not the only factor contributing to a Herschel detection, and significant dust extinction along the GRB sightline (A_{V,GRB}>1.5~mag) appears to be a considerably better tracer of GRBHs with high dust mass. This suggests that the extinguishing dust along the GRB line of sight lies predominantly within the host galaxy ISM, and thus those GRBs with A_{V,GRB}>1~mag but with no host galaxy Herschel detections are likely to have been predominantly extinguished by dust within an intervening dense cloud.
[71]  oai:arXiv.org:1311.6466  [pdf] - 829902
Spatially-resolved dust properties of the GRB 980425 host galaxy
Comments: Accepted by A&A. 14 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables. V2: minor updates to match the published version
Submitted: 2013-11-25, last modified: 2014-06-02
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been proposed as a tool for studying star formation in the Universe, so it is crucial to investigate whether their host galaxies and immediate environments are in any way special compared with other star-forming galaxies. Here we present spatially resolved maps of dust emission of the host galaxy of the closest known GRB 980425 at z=0.0085 using our new high-resolution observations from Herschel, Atacama Pathfinder Experiment (APEX), Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) and Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). We modelled the spectral energy distributions of the host and of the star-forming region displaying the Wolf-Rayet signatures in the spectrum (WR region), located 800 pc from the GRB position. The host is characterised by low dust content and a high fraction of UV-visible star formation, similar to other dwarf galaxies. These galaxies are abundant in the local universe, so it is not surprising to find a GRB in one of them, assuming the correspondence between the GRB rate and star formation. The WR region contributes substantially to the host emission at the far-infrared, millimetre, and radio wavelengths and we propose that this is a consequence of its high gas density. If dense environments are also found close to the positions of other GRBs, then the ISM density should also be considered, along with metallicity, an important factor influencing whether a given stellar population can produce a GRB.
[72]  oai:arXiv.org:1405.5131  [pdf] - 1209641
A complete sample of bright Swift short Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: 17 pages, 8 figures, 7 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2014-05-20
We present a carefully selected sample of short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) observed by the Swift satellite up to June 2013. Inspired by the criteria we used to build a similar sample of bright long GRBs (the BAT6 sample), we selected SGRBs with favorable observing conditions for the redshift determination on ground, ending up with a sample of 36 events, almost half of which with a redshift measure. The redshift completeness increases up to about 70% (with an average redshift value of z = 0.85) by restricting to those events that are bright in the 15-150 keV Swift Burst Alert Telescope energy band. Such flux-limited sample minimizes any redshift-related selection effects, and can provide a robust base for the study of the energetics, redshift distribution and environment of the Swift bright population of SGRBs. For all the events of the sample we derived the prompt and afterglow emission in both the observer and (when possible) rest frame and tested the consistency with the correlations valid for long GRBs. The redshift and intrinsic X-ray absorbing column density distributions we obtain are consistent with the scenario of SGRBs originated by the coalescence of compact objects in primordial binaries, with a possible minor contribution (~10%-25%) of binaries formed by dynamical capture (or experiencing large natal kicks). This sample is expected to significantly increase with further years of Swift activity.
[73]  oai:arXiv.org:1405.4114  [pdf] - 1209583
Effective absorbing column density in the gamma-ray burst afterglow X-ray spectra
Comments: MNRAS accepted. 6 figures. 3 tables
Submitted: 2014-05-16
We investigate the scaling relation between the observed amount of absorption in the X-ray spectra of Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) afterglows and the absorber redshift. Through dedicated numerical simulations of an ideal instrument, we establish that this dependence has a power law shape with index 2.4. However, for real instruments, this value depends on their low energy cut-off, spectral resolution and on the detector spectral response in general. We thus provide appropriate scaling laws for specific instruments. Finally, we discuss the possibility to measure the absorber redshift from X-ray data alone. We find that 10^5-10^6 counts in the 0.3-10 keV band are needed to constrain the redshift with 10% accuracy. As a test case we discuss the XMM-Newton observation of GRB 090618 at z=0.54. We are able to recover the correct redshift of this burst with the expected accuracy.
[74]  oai:arXiv.org:1404.6654  [pdf] - 862714
Diversity of GRB energetics vs. SN homogeneity: supernova 2013cq associated with the gamma-ray burst 130427A
Comments: To appear in Astronomy and Astrophysics: 10 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2014-04-26
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been found to be associated with broad-lined type-Ic supernovae (SNe), but only a handful of cases have been studied in detail. Prompted by the discovery of the exceptionally bright, nearby GRB130427A (redshift z=0.3399), we aim at characterising the properties of its associated SN2013cq. This is the first opportunity to test directly the progenitors of high-luminosity GRBs. We monitored the field of the Swift long duration GRB130427A using the 3.6-m TNG and the 8.2-m VLT during the time interval between 3.6 and 51.6 days after the burst. Photometric and spectroscopic observations revealed the presence of the type Ic SN2013cq. Spectroscopic analysis suggests that SN2013cq resembles two previous GRB-SNe, SN1998bw and SN2010bh associated with GRB980425 and XRF100316D, respectively. The bolometric light curve of SN2013cq, which is significantly affected by the host galaxy contribution, is systematically more luminous than that of SN2010bh ($\sim$ 2 mag at peak), but is consistent with SN1998bw. The comparison with the light curve model of another GRB-connected SN2003dh, indicates that SN2013cq is consistent with the model when brightened by 20%. This suggests a synthesised radioactive $^{56}$Ni mass of $\sim 0.4 M_\odot$. GRB130427A/SN2013cq is the first case of low-z GRB-SN connection where the GRB energetics are extreme ($E_{\rm \gamma, iso} \sim 10^{54}$ erg). We show that the maximum luminosities attained by SNe associated with GRBs span a very narrow range, but those associated with XRFs are significantly less luminous. On the other hand the isotropic energies of the accompanying GRBs span 6 orders of magnitude (10$^{48}$ erg $< E_{\rm \gamma, iso} <$ 10$^{54}$ erg), although this range is reduced when corrected for jet collimation. The GRB total radiated energy is in fact a small fraction of the SN energy budget.
[75]  oai:arXiv.org:1403.3245  [pdf] - 822622
Optical and X-ray Rest-frame Light Curves of the BAT6 sample
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A: 10 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables
Submitted: 2014-03-13
We present the rest-frame light curves in the optical and X-ray bands of an unbiased and complete sample of Swift long Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), namely the BAT6 sample. The unbiased BAT6 sample (consisting of 58 events) has the highest level of completeness in redshift ($\sim$ 95%), allowing us to compute the rest-frame X-ray and optical light curves for 55 and 47 objects, respectively. We compute the X-ray and optical luminosities accounting for any possible source of absorption (Galactic and intrinsic) that could affect the observed fluxes in these two bands. We compare the behaviour observed in the X-ray and in the optical bands to assess the relative contribution of the emission during the prompt and afterglow phases. We unarguably demonstrate that the GRBs rest-frame optical luminosity distribution is not bimodal, being rather clustered around the mean value Log(L$_{R}$) = 29.9 $\pm$ 0.8 when estimated at a rest frame time of 12 hr. This is in contrast with what found in previous works and confirms that the GRB population has an intrinsic unimodal luminosity distribution. For more than 70% of the events the rest-frame light curves in the X-ray and optical bands have a different evolution, indicating distinct emitting regions and/or mechanisms. The X-ray light curves normalised to the GRB isotropic energy (E$_{\rm iso}$), provide evidence for X-ray emission still powered by the prompt emission until late times ($\sim$ hours after the burst event). On the other hand, the same test performed for the E$_{\rm iso}$-normalised optical light curves shows that the optical emission is a better proxy of the afterglow emission from early to late times.
[76]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.2940  [pdf] - 806779
The metallicity and dust content of a redshift 5 gamma-ray burst host galaxy
Comments: Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2013-09-11, last modified: 2014-03-12
Observations of the afterglows of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) allow the study of star-forming galaxies across most of cosmic history. Here we present observations of GRB 111008A from which we can measure metallicity, chemical abundance patterns, dust-to-metals ratio and extinction of the GRB host galaxy at z=5.0. The host absorption system is a damped Lyman-alpha absorber (DLA) with a very large neutral hydrogen column density of log N(HI)/cm^(-2) = 22.30 +/- 0.06, and a metallicity of [S/H]= -1.70 +/- 0.10. It is the highest redshift GRB with such a precise metallicity measurement. The presence of fine-structure lines confirms the z=5.0 system as the GRB host galaxy, and makes this the highest redshift where Fe II fine-structure lines have been detected. The afterglow is mildly reddened with A_V = 0.11 +/- 0.04 mag, and the host galaxy has a dust-to-metals ratio which is consistent with being equal to or lower than typical values in the Local Group.
[77]  oai:arXiv.org:1402.6338  [pdf] - 1203565
GRB orphan afterglows in present and future radio transient surveys
Comments: (10 pages, 5 figures, 1 table) Accepted for publication by PASA
Submitted: 2014-02-25
Orphan Afterglows (OA) are slow transients produced by Gamma Ray Bursts seen off-axis that become visible on timescales of days/years at optical/NIR and radio frequencies, when the prompt emission at high energies (X and gamma rays) has already ceased. Given the typically estimated jet opening angle of GRBs theta_jet ~ 3 deg, for each burst pointing to the Earth there should be a factor ~ 700 more GRBs pointing in other directions. Despite this, no secure OAs have been detected so far. Through a population synthesis code we study the emission properties of the population of OA at radio frequencies. OAs reach their emission peak on year-timescales and they last for a comparable amount of time. The typical peak fluxes (which depend on the observing frequency) are of few micro Jy in the radio band with only a few OA reaching the mJy level. These values are consistent with the upper limits on the radio flux of SN Ib/c observed at late times. We find that the OA radio number count distribution has a typical slope -1.7 at high fluxes and a flatter (-0.4) slope at low fluxes with a break at a frequency-dependent flux. Our predictions of the OA rates are consistent with the (upper) limits of recent radio surveys and archive searches for radio transients. Future radio surveys like VAST/ASKAP at 1.4 GHz should detect ~ 3x10^-3 OA deg^-2 yr-1, MeerKAT and EVLA at 8.4 GHz should see ~ 3x10^-1 OA deg-2 yr-1. The SKA, reaching the micro Jy flux limit, could see up to ~ 0.2-1.5 OA deg^-2 yr^-1. These rates also depend on the duration of the OA above a certain flux limit and we discuss this effect with respect to the survey cadence.
[78]  oai:arXiv.org:1402.4006  [pdf] - 1203384
New light on gamma-ray burst host galaxies with Herschel
Comments: 18 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in A&A. Revised to include Fig. 6, mistakenly omitted in original
Submitted: 2014-02-17, last modified: 2014-02-19
Until recently, dust emission has been detected in very few host galaxies of gamma-ray bursts (GRBHs). With Herschel, we have now observed 17 GRBHs up to redshift z~3 and detected seven of them at infrared (IR) wavelengths. This relatively high detection rate (41%) may be due to the composition of our sample which at a median redshift of 1.1 is dominated by the hosts of dark GRBs. Although the numbers are small, statistics suggest that dark GRBs are more likely to be detected in the IR than their optically-bright counterparts. Combining our IR data with optical, near-infrared, and radio data from our own datasets and from the literature, we have constructed spectral energy distributions (SEDs) which span up to 6 orders of magnitude in wavelength. By fitting the SEDs, we have obtained stellar masses, dust masses, star-formation rate (SFR), and extinctions for our sample galaxies. We find that GRBHs are galaxies that tend to have a high specfic SFR (sSFR), and like other star-forming galaxies, their ratios of dust-to-stellar mass are well correlated with sSFR. We incorporate our Herschel sample into a larger compilation of GRBHs, and compare this combined sample to SFR-weighted median stellar masses of the widest, deepest galaxy survey to date. This is done in order to establish whether or not GRBs can be used as an unbiased tracer of cosmic comoving SFR density (SFRD) in the universe. In contrast with previous results, this comparison shows that GRBHs are medium-sized galaxies with relatively high sSFRs; stellar masses and sSFRs of GRBHs as a function of redshift are similar to what is expected for star-forming galaxy populations at similar redshifts. We conclude that there is no strong evidence that GRBs are biased tracers of SFRD; thus they should be able to reliably probe the SFRD to early epochs.
[79]  oai:arXiv.org:1402.4026  [pdf] - 806331
VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of the GRB 120327A afterglow
Comments: 18 pages, 12 figures, accepted by A&A
Submitted: 2014-02-17
We present a study of the environment of the Swift long gamma-ray burst GRB 120327A at z ~2.8 through optical spectroscopy of its afterglow. We analyzed medium-resolution, multi-epoch spectroscopic observations (~7000 - 12000, corresponding to ~ 15 - 23 km/s, S/N = 15- 30 and wavelength range 3000-25000AA) of the optical afterglow of GRB 120327A, taken with X-shooter at the VLT 2.13 and 27.65 hr after the GRB trigger. The first epoch spectrum shows that the ISM in the GRB host galaxy at z = 2.8145 is extremely rich in absorption features, with three components contributing to the line profiles. The hydrogen column density associated with GRB 120327A has log NH / cm^(-2) = 22.01 +/- 0.09, and the metallicity of the host galaxy is in the range [X/H] = -1.3 to -1.1. In addition to the ground state lines, we detect absorption features associated with excited states of CII, OI, SiII, FeII, and NiII, which we used to derive information on the distance between the host absorbing gas and the site of the GRB explosion. The variability of the FeI\lambda2396 excited line between the two epochs proves that these features are excited by the GRB UV flux. Moreover, the distance of component I is found to be dI=200+100-60 pc, while component II is located closer to the GRB, at dII=100+40-30 pc. These values are among the lowest found in GRBs. Component III does not show excited transitions, so it should be located farther away from the GRB. The presence of H2 molecules is firmly established, with a molecular fraction in the range f=4 X 10^(-7) - 10^(-4). This particularly low value can be attributed to the small dust content. This represents the third positive detection of molecules in a GRB environment.
[80]  oai:arXiv.org:1306.0013  [pdf] - 770256
How to switch on and off a Gamma-ray burst through a magnetar
Comments: 10 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables
Submitted: 2013-05-31, last modified: 2014-01-14
One of the most elusive features of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) is the sporadic emission prior to the main prompt event observed in at least $\sim 15\%$ of cases. These precursors have spectral and temporal properties similar to the main prompt emission, and smaller, but comparable, energetics. They are separated from the main event by a quiescent time that may be extremely long and, in some cases, more than one precursor has been observed in the same burst. Precursors are still a puzzle: despite many attempts none of the proposed models can account for all the observed features. Based on the complete sample of bright long GRBs observed by Swift (BAT6), we propose a new scenario for which precursors are explained by assuming that the central GRB engine is a newly born magnetar. In this model the precursor and the prompt emission arise from accretion of matter onto the surface of the magnetar. The accretion process can be halted by the centrifugal drag exerted by the rotating magnetosphere onto the in-falling matter, allowing for multiple precursors and very long quiescent times.
[81]  oai:arXiv.org:1401.1972  [pdf] - 1202645
A magnetar powering the ordinary monster GRB 130427A?
Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure, accepted for publication in MNRAS Letters
Submitted: 2014-01-09
We present the analysis of the extraordinarily bright Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) 130427A under the hypothesis that the GRB central engine is an accretion-powered magnetar. In this framework, initially proposed to explain GRBs with precursor activity, the prompt emission is produced by accretion of matter onto a newly-born magnetar, and the observed power is related to the accretion rate. The emission is eventually halted if the centrifugal forces are able to pause accretion. We show that the X-ray and optical afterglow is well explained as the forward shock emission with a jet break plus a contribution from the spin-down of the magnetar. Our modelling does not require any contribution from the reverse shock, that may still influence the afterglow light curve at radio and mm frequencies, or in the optical at early times. We derive the magnetic field ($B\sim 10^{16}$ G) and the spin period ($P\sim 20$ ms) of the magnetar and obtain an independent estimate of the minimum luminosity for accretion. This minimum luminosity results well below the prompt emission luminosity of GRB 130427A, providing a strong consistency check for the scenario where the entire prompt emission is the result of continuous accretion onto the magnetar. This is in agreement with the relatively long spin period of the magnetar. GRB 130427A was a well monitored GRB showing a very standard behavior and, thus, is a well-suited benchmark to show that an accretion-powered magnetar gives a unique view of the properties of long GRBs.
[82]  oai:arXiv.org:1308.2984  [pdf] - 796917
Spectroscopy of the short-hard GRB 130603B: The host galaxy and environment of a compact object merger
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Submitted: 2013-08-13, last modified: 2013-12-23
Short duration gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) are thought to be related to the violent merger of compact objects, such as neutron stars or black holes, which makes them promising sources of gravitational waves. The detection of a 'kilonova'-like signature associated to the Swift-detected GRB 130603B has suggested that this event is the result of a compact object merger. Our knowledge on SGRB has been, until now, mostly based on the absence of supernova signatures and the analysis of the host galaxies to which they cannot always be securely associated. Further progress has been significantly hampered by the faintness and rapid fading of their optical counterparts (afterglows), which has so far precluded spectroscopy of such events. Afterglow spectroscopy is the key tool to firmly determine the distance at which the burst was produced, crucial to understand its physics, and study its local environment. Here we present the first spectra of a prototypical SGRB afterglow in which both absorption and emission features are clearly detected. Together with multiwavelength photometry we study the host and environment of GRB 130603B. From these spectra we determine the redshift of the burst to be z = 0.3565+/-0.0002, measure rich dynamics both in absorption and emission, and a substantial line of sight extinction of A_V = 0.86+/-0.15 mag. The GRB was located at the edge of a disrupted arm of a moderately star forming galaxy with near-solar metallicity. Unlike for most long GRBs (LGRBs), N_HX / A_V is consistent with the Galactic ratio, indicating that the explosion site differs from those found in LGRBs. The merger is not associated with the most star-forming region of the galaxy; however, it did occur in a dense region, implying a rapid merger or a low natal kick velocity for the compact object binary.
[83]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.2298  [pdf] - 717387
A Complete Sample of Long Bright Swift GRBs
Comments: 7th Huntsville Gamma-Ray Burst Symposium, GRB 2013: paper 7 in eConf Proceedings C1304143
Submitted: 2013-09-09
Starting from the Swift sample we define a complete sub-sample of 58 bright long Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB), 55 of them (95%) with a redshift determination, in order to characterize their properties. Our sample (BAT6) allows us to study the properties of the long GRB population and their evolution with cosmic time. We focus in particular on the GRB luminosity function, on the spectral-energy correlations of their prompt emission, on the nature of dark bursts, on possible correlations between the prompt and the X-ray afterglow properties, and on the dust extinction.
[84]  oai:arXiv.org:1306.4585  [pdf] - 734108
GRB 081007 and GRB 090424: the surrounding medium, outflows and supernovae
Comments: 15 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2013-06-19, last modified: 2013-08-25
We discuss the results of the analysis of multi-wavelength data for the afterglows of GRB 081007 and GRB 090424, two bursts detected by Swift. One of them, GRB 081007, also shows a spectroscopically confirmed supernova, SN 2008hw, which resembles SN 1998bw in its absorption features, while the maximum luminosity is only about half as large as that of SN 1998bw. Bright optical flashes have been detected in both events, which allows us to derive solid constraints on the circumburst-matter density profile. This is particularly interesting in the case of GRB 081007, whose afterglow is found to be propagating into a constant-density medium, yielding yet another example of a GRB clearly associated with a massive star progenitor which did not sculpt the surroundings with its stellar wind. There is no supernova component detected in the afterglow of GRB 090424, likely due to the brightness of the host galaxy, comparable to the Milky Way. We show that the afterglow data are consistent with the presence of both forward- and reverse-shock emission powered by relativistic outflows expanding into the interstellar medium. The absence of optical peaks due to the forward shock strongly suggests that the reverse shock regions should be mildly magnetized. The initial Lorentz factor of outflow of GRB 081007 is estimated to be \Gamma ~ 200, while for GRB 090424 a lower limit of \Gamma > 170 is derived. We also discuss the prompt emission of GRB 081007, which consists of just a single pulse. We argue that neither the external forward-shock model nor the shock-breakout model can account for the prompt emission data and suggest that the single-pulse-like prompt emission may be due to magnetic energy dissipation of a Poynting-flux dominated outflow or to a dissipative photosphere.
[85]  oai:arXiv.org:1307.7704  [pdf] - 1173039
Radio afterglows of a complete sample of bright Swift GRBs: predictions from present days to the SKA era
Comments: 9 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. To appear in MNRAS
Submitted: 2013-07-29
Radio observations of Gamma Ray Bursts afterglows are fundamental in providing insights into their physics and environment, and in constraining the true energetics of these sources. Nonetheless, radio observations of GRB afterglows are presently sparse in the time/frequency domain. Starting from a complete sample of 58 bright Swift long bursts (BAT6), we constructed a homogeneous sub-sample of 38 radio detections/upper limits which preserves all the properties of the parent sample. One half of the bursts have detections between 1 and 5 days after the explosion with typical fluxes F>100 muJy at 8.4 GHz. Through a Population SYnthesis Code coupled with the standard afterglow Hydrodynamical Emission model (PSYCHE) we reproduce the radio flux distribution of the radio sub-sample. Based on these results we study the detectability in the time/frequency domain of the entire long GRB population by present and future radio facilities. We find that the GRBs that typically trigger Swift can be detected at 8.4 GHz by JVLA within few days with modest exposures even at high redshifts. The final SKA can potentially observe the whole GRB population provided that there will be a dedicated GRB gamma-ray detector more sensitive than Swift. For a sizable fraction (50%) of these bursts, SKA will allow us to perform radio-calorimetry, after the trans-relativistic transition (occurring ~100 d), providing an estimate of the true (collimation corrected) energetics of GRBs.
[86]  oai:arXiv.org:1307.2232  [pdf] - 699247
CTA contributions to the 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2013)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abril, O.; Acharya, B. S.; Actis, M.; Agnetta, G.; Aguilar, J. A.; Aharonian, F.; Ajello, M.; Akhperjanian, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Aleksic, J.; Alfaro, R.; Aliu, E.; Allafort, A. J.; Allan, D.; Allekotte, I.; Aloisio, R.; Amato, E.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Angüner, E. O.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonuccio, V.; Antonucci, M.; Antoranz, P.; Aravantinos, A.; Argan, A.; Arlen, T.; Aramo, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arnaldi, H.; Arrabito, L.; Asano, K.; Ashton, T.; Asorey, H. G.; Aune, T.; Awane, Y.; Baba, H.; Babic, A.; Baby, N.; Bähr, J.; Bais, A.; Baixeras, C.; Bajtlik, S.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballet, J.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barceló, M.; Barnacka, A.; Barnstedt, J.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basili, A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Baushev, A.; Becciani, U.; Becerra, J.; Becerra, J.; Becherini, Y.; Bechtol, K. C.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Behera, B.; Belluso, M.; Benbow, W.; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Berger, K.; Bernard, F.; Bernardino, T.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Bhat, N.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Billotta, S.; Bird, T.; Birsin, E.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Blake, S.; Bigas, O. Blanch; Blasi, P.; Bobkov, A.; Boccone, V.; Böttcher, M.; Bogacz, L.; Bogart, J.; Bogdan, M.; Boisson, C.; Gargallo, J. Boix; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonev, T.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnoli, G.; Bordas, P.; Borgland, A.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Botner, O.; Bottani, A.; Bouchet, L.; Bourgeat, M.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouvier, A.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Braun, I.; Bretz, T.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Britto, R.; Brook, P.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Bucciantini, N.; Buanes, T.; Buckley, J.; Bühler, R.; Bugaev, V.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Byrum, K.; Cailles, M.; Cameron, R.; Camprecios, J.; Canestrari, R.; Cantu, S.; Capalbi, M.; Caraveo, P.; Carmona, E.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carr, J.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Caruso, R.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Catalano, O.; Cavazzani, S.; Cazaux, S.; Cerchiara, P.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Champion, C.; Chaves, R.; Cheimets, P.; Chen, A.; Chiang, J.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chitnis, V. R.; Chollet, F.; Christof, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Cillis, A.; Cilmo, M.; Codino, A.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Compin, M.; Conconi, P.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Coridian, J.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Couturier, S.; Covino, S.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Croston, J.; Cusumano, G.; Dafonseca, M.; Dale, O.; Daniel, M.; Darling, J.; Davids, I.; Dazzi, F.; de Angelis, A.; De Caprio, V.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De La Vega, G. A.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; de Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; de Naurois, M.; de Oliveira, Y.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; de Palma, F.; de Souza, V.; Decerprit, G.; Decock, G.; Deil, C.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Demange, P.; Depaola, G.; Dettlaff, A.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; di Sciascio, G.; Díaz, C.; Dick, J.; Dickherber, R.; Dickinson, H.; Diez-Blanco, V.; Digel, S.; Dimitrov, D.; Disset, G.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domainko, W.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Drake, G.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubois, F.; Dubois, R.; Dubus, G.; Dufour, C.; Dumas, D.; Dumm, J.; Durand, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Einecke, S.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elles, S.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelhaupt, D.; Enomoto, R.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Errando, M.; Etchegoyen, A.; Evans, P. A.; Falcone, A.; Faltenbacher, A.; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favill, B. W.; Fede, E.; Federici, S.; Fegan, S.; Feinstein, F.; Ferenc, D.; Ferrando, P.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiasson, A.; Fillin-Martino, E.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Fiorini, M.; Curcoll, R. Firpo; Flandrini, E.; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Focke, W.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Frankowski, A.; Fransson, C.; Fraser, G. W.; Frei, R.; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gabriele, R.; Gadola, A.; Galante, N.; Gall, D.; Gallant, Y.; Gámez-García, J.; Garczarczyk, M.; García, B.; López, R. Garcia; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, F.; Garrido, D.; Garrido, L.; Gascon, D.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Gebremedhin, L.; Geffroy, N.; Gerard, L.; Ghedina, A.; Ghigo, M.; Ghislain, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Girard, N.; Giro, E.; Giuliani, A.; Glanzman, T.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Godinovic, N.; Golev, V.; Berisso, M. Gomez; Gómez-Ortega, J.; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; González, F.; Muñoz, A. González; Gothe, K. S.; Grabarczyk, T.; Gougerot, M.; Graciani, R.; Grandi, P.; Grañena, F.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A.; Greenshaw, T.; Grégoire, T.; Grillo, A.; Grimm, O.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Gruev, V.; Grünewald, S.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hagiwara, R.; Hahn, J.; Hakansson, N.; Hallgren, A.; Heras, N. Hamer; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Harezlak, D.; Harris, J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, R.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J. A.; Hirotani, K.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Hofverberg, P.; Holder, J.; Hörandel, J. R.; Horns, D.; Horville, D.; Houles, J.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huan, H.; Huber, B.; Huet, J. -M.; Hughes, G.; Humensky, T. B.; Huovelin, J.; Huppert, J. -F.; Ibarra, A.; Ikawa, D.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Incorvaia, S.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Israel, G. L.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janiak, M.; Jean, P.; Jeanney, C.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C.; Johnson, T.; Journet, L.; Juffroy, C.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Kabuki, S.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Kasperek, J.; Kastana, D.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kellner-Leidel, B.; Kelly, H.; Kendziorra, E.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kifune, T.; Kihm, T.; Kishimoto, T.; Kitamoto, K.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapic, C.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kodani, K.; Köhne, J. -H.; Kohri, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Konno, Y.; Köppel, H.; Korohoda, P.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Kossakowski, R.; Koul, R.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Krähenbühl, T.; Krause, J.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Krepps, A.; Kretzschmann, A.; Krobot, R.; Krueger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V. A.; Kushida, J.; Kuznetsov, A.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Lacombe, K.; Lamanna, G.; Lande, J.; Languignon, D.; Lapington, J. S.; Laporte, P.; Laurent, B.; Lavalley, C.; Flour, T. Le; Padellec, A. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lefèvre, J. -P.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leoni, R.; Leopold, D. J.; Lerch, T.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Lieunard, B.; Lieunard, S.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; López-Coto, R.; López-Oramas, A.; Lorca, A.; Lorenz, E.; Louis, F.; Lubinski, P.; Lucarelli, F.; Lüdecke, H.; Ludwin, J.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lustermann, W.; Luz, O.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T. J.; Madejski, G. M.; Madhavan, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Maltezos, S.; Manalaysay, A.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Mangano, A.; Manigot, P.; Mannheim, K.; Manthos, I.; Maragos, N.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Marszałek, A.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, F.; Martínez, M.; Massaro, F.; Masserot, A.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mathieu, A.; Matsumoto, H.; Mattana, F.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurer, A.; Maurin, G.; Maxfield, S.; Maya, J.; Mazin, D.; Comb, L. Mc; McCann, A.; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; McKay, R.; Meagher, K.; Medina, C.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melo, D.; Mereghetti, S.; Mertsch, P.; Meucci, M.; Meyer, M.; Michałowski, J.; Micolon, P.; Mihailidis, A.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mistò, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moal, B.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Molinari, E.; Molinaro, M.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Moore, P.; Olaizola, A. Moralejo; Mordalska, M.; Morello, C.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mrusek, I.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar-Adrover, P.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Murphy, A. StJ.; Nagataki, S.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, C.; Naumann, D.; Naumann-Godo, M.; Nayman, P.; Nedbal, D.; Neise, D.; Nellen, L.; Neronov, A.; Neustroev, V.; Neyroud, N.; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Noda, K.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nowak, N.; Nozato, A.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P. T.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okuda, T.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Ong, R. A.; Orito, R.; Orr, M.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otero, L. A.; Otte, N.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padilla, L.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paillot, D.; Paizis, A.; Palanque, S.; Palatka, M.; Pallota, J.; Palatiello, M.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parraud, J. -M.; Parsons, D.; Pauletta, G.; Arribas, M. Paz; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Pelassa, V.; Pelat, D.; Perez, M. d. C.; Persic, M.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Peyaud, B.; Pichel, A.; Pieloth, D.; Pierre, E.; Pita, S.; Pivato, G.; Pizzolato, F.; Platino, M.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Pojmanski, G.; Ponz, J. D.; Potter, W.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Preece, R.; Profeti, F.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Proyetti, M.; Puerto-Giménez, I.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pyzioł, R.; Quel, E. J.; Quesada, J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Racero, E.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Ramon, P.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Raue, M.; Ravignani, D.; Reardon, P.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reitberger, K.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reville, B.; Rhode, W.; Ribó, M.; Ribordy, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Ringegni, P.; Ripken, J.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivière, A.; Rivoire, S.; Rob, L.; Rodeghiero, G.; Roeser, U.; Rohlfs, R.; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romaszkan, W.; Romero, G. E.; Rosen, S. R.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rousselle, S.; Rovero, A. C.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Rudak, B.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Ryde, F.; Saavedra, O.; Sacco, B.; Saemann, E. O.; Saggion, A.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, K.; Saito, T.; Saito, Y.; Sakaki, N.; Sakonaka, R.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, F.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandoval, A.; Sandaker, H.; Sant'Ambrogio, E.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Sartore, N.; Sasaki, H.; Satalecka, K.; Sawada, M.; Scalzotto, V.; Scapin, V.; Scarcioffolo, M.; Schafer, J.; Schanz, T.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schlickeiser, R.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schovanek, P.; Schroedter, M.; Schubert, A.; Schultz, C.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schwarzburg, S.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shi, J.; Shibata, T.; Shibuya, A.; Shore, S.; Shum, E.; Sideras-Haddad, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Sikora, M.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Singh, B. B.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Skole, C.; Smareglia, R.; Smith, A.; Smith, D.; Smith, J.; Smith, N.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spiga, D.; Spyrou, S.; Stamatescu, V.; Stamerra, A.; Starling, R. L. C.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, Th.; Straumann, U.; Strazzeri, E.; Stringhetti, L.; Suarez, A.; Suchenek, M.; Sugawara, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Sun, S.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J. M.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szostek, A.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takalo, L.; Takami, H.; Talbot, G.; Tammi, J.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tasan, J.; Tavani, M.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrier, R.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tibaldo, L.; Tibolla, O.; Tiengo, A.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tonachini, A.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Toscano, S.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Travnicek, P.; Treves, A.; Trifoglio, M.; Troyano, I.; Tsinganos, K.; Ueno, H.; Umana, G.; Umehara, K.; Upadhya, S. S.; Usher, T.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J. F.; Vallania, P.; Vallejo, G.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; Vandenbrouke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vankov, H.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Veberic, D.; Vegas, I.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssière, C.; Vialle, J. P.; Viana, A.; Videla, M.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Vogler, P.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; von Gunten, H. -P.; Vorobiov, S.; Vuerli, C.; Waegebaert, V.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R. G.; Wagner, S.; Wakely, S. P.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Warda, K.; Warwick, R. S.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weinstein, A.; Weitzel, Q.; Welsing, R.; Werner, M.; Wetteskind, H.; White, R. J.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M. I.; Williams, D. A.; Willingale, R.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Wischnewski, R.; Wiśniewski, Ł.; Wojcik, P.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Xiong, Q.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yebras, J. M.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zacharias, M.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zanin, R.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zhao, A.; Zhou, X.; Zietara, K.; Ziolkowski, J.; Ziółkowski, P.; Zitelli, V.; Zurbach, C.; Zychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings at the ICRC2013, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). v1: placeholder with no arXiv links yet, to be replaced once individual contributions have been all submitted. v2: final with arXiv links to all CTA contributions and full author list
Submitted: 2013-07-08, last modified: 2013-07-29
Compilation of CTA contributions to the proceedings of the 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2013), which took place in 2-9 July, 2013, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
[87]  oai:arXiv.org:1307.0950  [pdf] - 1172461
A method for quantifying the Gamma Ray Burst "bias". Application in the redshift range 0-1.1
Comments: 9 pages, 5 figures, accepted in A&A
Submitted: 2013-07-03
Long Gamma Ray Bursts (LGRBs) are related to the final stages of evolution of massive stars. As such, they should follow the star formation rate (SFR) of galaxies. We can use them to probe for star-forming galaxies (SFGs) in the distant universe following this assumption. The relation between the rate of LGRBs in a given galaxy and its SFR (that we call the LGRB "bias") may be complex, as we have indications that the LGRB hosts are not perfect analogues to the general population of SFGs. In this work, we try to quantify the dependence of the LGRB bias on physical parameters of their host galaxy such as the SFR or the stellar mass. We propose an empirical method based on the comparison of stellar mass functions (and SFR distributions) of LGRB hosts and of SFGs in order to find how the bias depends on the stellar mass or the SFR. By applying this method to a sample of LGRB hosts at redshifts lower than 1.1, where the properties of SFGs are well established, and where the properties of LGRB host galaxies can be deduced from observations (for stellar masses larger than 10**9.25 Msun and SFR larger than 1.8 Msun / yr), we find that the LGRB bias depends on both the stellar mass and SFR. We find that the bias decreases with the SFR, i.e. we see no preference for highly SFGs, once taken into account the larger number of massive stars in galaxies with larger SFR. We do not find any trend with the specific star formation rate (SSFR) but the dynamical range in SSFR in our study is narrow. Although through an indirect method, we relate these trends to a possible decrease of the LGRBs rate / SFR ratio with the metallicity. The method we propose suggests trends that may be useful to constrain models of LGRB progenitors, showing a clear decrease of the LGRB bias with the metallicity. This is promising for the future as the number of LGRB hosts studied will increase.
[88]  oai:arXiv.org:1304.7003  [pdf] - 730567
Molecular Hydrogen in the Damped Lyman-alpha System towards GRB 120815A at z=2.36
Comments: 21 pages, 14 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2013-04-25, last modified: 2013-06-26
We present the discovery of molecular hydrogen (H_2), including the presence of vibrationally-excited H_2^* in the optical spectrum of the afterglow of GRB 120815A at z=2.36 obtained with X-shooter at the VLT. Simultaneous photometric broad-band data from GROND and X-ray observations by Swift/XRT place further constraints on the amount and nature of dust along the sightline. The galactic environment of GRB 120815A is characterized by a strong DLA with log(N(H)/cm^-2) = 21.95 +/- 0.10, prominent H_2 absorption in the Lyman-Werner bands (log(N(H_2)/cm^-2) = 20.53 +/- 0.13) and thus a molecular gas fraction log f(H_2)=-1.14 +/- 0.15. The distance d between the absorbing neutral gas and GRB 120815A is constrained via photo-excitation modeling of fine-structure and meta-stable transitions of FeII and NiII to d = 0.5 +/- 0.1 kpc. The DLA metallicity ([Zn/H] = -1.15 +/- 0.12), visual extinction (A_V < 0.15 mag) and dust depletion ([Zn/Fe] = 1.01 +/- 0.10) are intermediate between the values of well-studied, H_2-deficient GRB-DLAs observed at high spectral resolution, and the approximately solar metallicity, highly-obscured and H_2-rich GRB 080607 sightline. With respect to N(H), metallicity, as well as dust-extinction and depletion, GRB 120815A is fairly representative of the average properties of GRB-DLAs. This demonstrates that molecular hydrogen is present in at least a fraction of the more typical GRB-DLAs, and H_2 and H_2^* are probably more wide-spread among GRB-selected systems than the few examples of previous detections would suggest.
[89]  oai:arXiv.org:1303.4743  [pdf] - 1165393
Dust extinction for an unbiased sample of GRB afterglows
Comments: 18 pages, 7 figures, 10 tables, MNRAS, in press
Submitted: 2013-03-19, last modified: 2013-03-29
In this paper we compute rest-frame extinctions for the afterglows of a sample of gamma-ray bursts complete in redshift. The selection criteria of the sample are based on observational high-energy parameters of the prompt emission and therefore our sample should not be biased against dusty sight-lines. It is therefore expected that our inferences hold for the general population of gamma-ray bursts. Our main result is that the optical/near-infrared extinction of gamma-ray burst afterglows in our sample does not follow a single distribution. 87% of the events are absorbed by less than 2 mag, and 50% suffer from less than 0.3-0.4 mag extinction. The remaining 13% of the afterglows are highly absorbed. The true percentage of gamma-ray burst afterglows showing high absorption could be even higher since a fair fraction of the events without reliable redshift measurement are probably part of this class. These events may be due to highly dusty molecular clouds/star forming regions associated with the gamma-ray burst progenitor or along the afterglow line of sight, and/or to massive dusty host galaxies. No clear evolution in the dust extinction properties is evident within the redshift range of our sample, although the largest extinctions are at z~1.5-2, close to the expected peak of the star formation rate. Those events classified as dark are characterized, on average, by a higher extinction than typical events in the sample. A correlation between optical/near-infrared extinction and hydrogen-equivalent column density based on X-ray studies is shown although the observed NH appears to be well in excess compared to those observed in the Local Group. Dust extinction does not seem to correlate with GRB energetics or luminosity.
[90]  oai:arXiv.org:1302.6362  [pdf] - 1164853
Clustering of galaxies around GRB sight-lines
Comments: 10 pages, 6 figures. A&A accepted
Submitted: 2013-02-26
There is evidence of an overdensity of strong intervening MgII absorption line systems distributed along the lines of sight towards GRB afterglows relative to quasar sight-lines. If this excess is real, one should also expect an overdensity of field galaxies around GRB sight-lines, as strong MgII tends to trace these sources. In this work, we test this expectation by calculating the two point angular correlation function of galaxies within 120$^{\prime\prime}$ ($\sim470~h_{71}^{-1}~\mathrm{Kpc}$ at $\langle z\rangle \sim0.4$) of GRB afterglows. We compare the Gamma-ray burst Optical and Near-infrared Detector (GROND) GRB afterglow sample -- one of the largest and most homogeneous samples of GRB fields -- with galaxies and AGN found in the COSMOS-30 photometric catalog. We find no significant signal of anomalous clustering of galaxies at an estimated median redshift of $z\sim0.3$ around GRB sight-lines, down to $K_{\mathrm{AB}}<19.3$. This result is contrary to the expectations from the MgII excess derived from GRB afterglow spectroscopy, although many confirmed galaxy counterparts to MgII absorbers may be too faint to detect in our sample -- especially those at $z>1$. We note that the addition of higher sensitivity Spitzer IRAC or HST WFC3 data for even a subset of our sample would increase this survey's depth by several orders of magnitude, simultaneously increasing statistics and enabling the investigation of a much larger redshift space.}
[91]  oai:arXiv.org:1211.6528  [pdf] - 1158110
An Independent Measurement of the Incidence of MgII Absorbers along Gamma-Ray Burst Sightlines: the End of the Mystery?
Comments: 42 pages, 22 figures, submitted to ApJ
Submitted: 2012-11-28
In 2006, Prochter et al. reported a statistically significant enhancement of very strong Mg II absorption systems intervening the sightlines to gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) relative to the in- cidence of such absorption along quasar sightlines. This counterintuitive result, has inspired a diverse set of astrophysical explanations (e.g. dust, gravitational lensing) but none of these has obviously resolved the puzzle. Using the largest set of GRB afterglow spectra available, we reexamine the purported enhancement. In an independent sample of GRB spectra with a survey path 3 times larger than Prochter et al., we measure the incidence per unit redshift of $\geq 1$\AA rest-frame equivalent width Mg II absorbers at $z \approx 1$ to be l(z)= 0.18 $\pm$ 0.06. This is fully consistent with current estimates for the incidence of such absorbers along quasar sightlines. Therefore, we do not confirm the original enhancement and suggest those results suffered from a statistical fluke. Signatures of the original result do remain in our full sample (l(z) shows an $\approx 1.5$ enhancement over l(z)QSO), but the statistical significance now lies at $\approx 90%$ c.l. Restricting our analysis to the subset of high-resolution spectra of GRB afterglows (which overlaps substantially with Prochter et al.), we still reproduce a statistically significant enhancement of Mg II absorption. The reason for this excess, if real, is still unclear since there is no connection between the rapid afterglow follow-up process with echelle (or echellette) spectrographs and the detectability of strong Mg II doublets. Only a larger sample of such high-resolution data will shed some light on this matter.
[92]  oai:arXiv.org:1206.5532  [pdf] - 1124344
The Optical SN 2012bz Associated with the Long GRB 120422A
Comments: 7 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Submitted: 2012-06-24, last modified: 2012-10-03
The association of Type Ic SNe with long-duration GRBs is well established. We endeavor, through accurate ground-based observational campaigns, to characterize these SNe at increasingly high redshifts. We obtained a series of optical photometric and spectroscopic observations of the Type Ic SN2012bz associated with the Swift long-duration GRB120422A (z=0.283) using the 3.6-m TNG and the 8.2-m VLT telescopes. The peak times of the light curves of SN2012bz in various optical filters differ, with the B-band and i'-band light curves reaching maximum at ~9 and ~23 rest-frame days, respectively. The bolometric light curve has been derived from individual bands photometric measurements, but no correction for the unknown contribution in the near-infrared (probably around 10-15%) has been applied. Therefore, the present light curve should be considered as a lower limit to the actual UV-optical-IR bolometric light curve. This pseudo-bolometric curve reaches its maximum (Mbol = -18.56 +/- 0.06) at 13 +/- 1 rest-frame days; it is similar in shape and luminosity to the bolometric light curves of the SNe associated with z<0.2 GRBs and more luminous than those of SNe associated with XRFs. A comparison with the model generated for the bolometric light curve of SN2003dh suggests that SN2012bz produced only about 15% less 56Ni than SN2003dh, about 0.35 Msol. Similarly the VLT spectra of SN2012bz, after correction for Galactic extinction and for the contribution of the host galaxy, suggest comparable explosion parameters with those observed in SN2003dh (EK~3.5 x 10^52 erg, Mej~7 Msol) and a similar progenitor mass (~25-40 Msol). GRB120422A is consistent with the Epeak-Eiso and the EX,iso-Egamma,iso-E_peak relations. GRB120422A/SN2012bz shows the GRB-SN connection at the highest redshift so far accurately monitored both photometrically and spectroscopically.
[93]  oai:arXiv.org:1206.2357  [pdf] - 1124038
A complete sample of bright Swift Gamma-Ray Bursts: X-ray afterglow luminosity and its correlation with the prompt emission
Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2012-06-11
We investigate wheter there is any correlation between the X-ray afterglow luminosity and the prompt emission properties of a carefully selected sub-sample of bright Swift long Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) nearly complete in redshift (~90%). Being free of selection effects (except flux limit), this sample provides the possibility to compare the rest frame physical properties of GRB prompt and afterglow emission in an unbiased way. The afterglow X-ray luminosities are computed at four different rest frame times (5 min, 1 hr, 11 hr and 24 hr after trigger) and compared with the prompt emission isotropic energy E_iso, the isotropic peak luminosity L_iso and the rest frame peak energy E_peak. We find that the rest frame afterglow X-ray luminosity do correlate with these prompt emission quantities, but the significance of each correlation decreases over time. This result is in agreement with the idea that the GRB X-ray light curve can be described as the result of a combination of different components whose relative contribution and weight change with time, with the prompt and afterglow emission dominating at early and late time, respectively. In particular, we found evidence that the plateau and the shallow decay phase often observed in GRB X-ray light curves are powered by activity from the central engine. The existence of the L_X-E_iso correlation at late times (t_rf > 11 hr) suggests a similar radiative efficiency among different bursts with on average about 6% of the total kinetic energy powering the prompt emission.
[94]  oai:arXiv.org:1206.2337  [pdf] - 1124031
GRB 100219A with X-shooter - abundances in a galaxy at z = 4.7
Comments: 16 pages, 15 figures. Resubmitted to A&A after referee comments
Submitted: 2012-06-11
Abundances of galaxies at redshifts z > 4 are difficult to obtain from damped Ly {\alpha} (DLA) systems in the sightlines of quasars (QSOs) due to the Ly {\alpha} forest blanketing and the low number of high-redshift quasars detected. Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with their higher luminosity are well suited to study galaxies out to the formation of the first stars at z > 10. Its large wavelength coverage makes the X-shooter spectrograph an excellent tool to study the interstellar medium (ISM) of high redshift galaxies, in particular if the redshift is not known beforehand. Here we determine the properties of a GRB host at z = 4.66723 from a number of resonant low- and high ionization and fine-structure absorption lines. This is one of the highest redshifts where a detailed analysis with medium-resolution data has been possible. We detect one intervening system at z = 2.18. The velocity components of the absorption lines are fitted with Voigt-profiles and we determine a metallicity of [M/H] = -1.0 \pm 0.1 using S. The absorption lines show a complicated kinematic structure which could point to a merger in progress. Si II* together with the restframe UV energy release determined from GROND data gives us the distance of 0.3 to 1 kpc of the absorbing material from the GRB. We measure a low extinction of AV = 0.24 \pm 0.06 mag using X-ray spectral information and the flux calibrated X-shooter spectrum. GRB-DLAs have a shallower evolution of metallicity with redshift than QSO absorbers and no evolution in HI column density or ionization fraction. GRB hosts at high redshift might continue the trend towards lower metallicities in the LZ-relation with redshift, but the sample is still too small to draw a definite conclusion. While the detection of GRBs at z > 4 with current satellites is still difficult, they are very important for our understanding of the early epochs of star- and galaxy-formation.
[95]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.1864  [pdf] - 1117167
On the Environment of Short Gamma-ray Bursts
Comments: 9 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2012-03-08, last modified: 2012-05-30
In this paper we present a sample of 10 short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with a robust redshift determination, discovered by the Swift satellite up to January 2011. We measure their X-ray absorbing column densities and collect data on the host galaxy offsets. We find evidence for intrinsic absorption and no correlation between the intrinsic absorbing column density and the projected offset of the GRB from its host galaxy center. We find that the properties in the gamma regime (T90, fluence and 1-s peak photon flux) of short GRBs with "bright" and "faint" X-ray afterglow likely disfavour different prompt emission mechanisms. Host galaxy offset and GRB duration (T90) do not correlate. Instead, there is a hint of anti-correlation between the effective radius normalised host galaxy offset and T90. Finally, we examine the properties of short GRBs with short-lived and long-lived X-ray afterglows, finding that some short GRBs with short-lived X-ray afterglows have their optical afterglow detected. In light of this, the X-ray afterglow duration does not seem to be an unique indicator of a specific progenitor and/or environment for short GRBs.
[96]  oai:arXiv.org:1111.4527  [pdf] - 967188
The Highly Energetic Expansion of SN2010bh Associated with GRB 100316D
Comments: 37 pages and 12 figures (one-column pre-print format), accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2011-11-18, last modified: 2012-05-02
We present the spectroscopic and photometric evolution of the nearby (z = 0.059) spectroscopically confirmed type Ic supernova, SN 2010bh, associated with the soft, long-duration gamma-ray burst (X-ray flash) GRB 100316D. Intensive follow-up observations of SN 2010bh were performed at the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT) using the X-shooter and FORS2 instruments. Owing to the detailed temporal coverage and the extended wavelength range (3000--24800 A), we obtained an unprecedentedly rich spectral sequence among the hypernovae, making SN 2010bh one of the best studied representatives of this SN class. We find that SN 2010bh has a more rapid rise to maximum brightness (8.0 +/- 1.0 rest-frame days) and a fainter absolute peak luminosity (L_bol~3e42 erg/s) than previously observed SN events associated with GRBs. Our estimate of the ejected (56)Ni mass is 0.12 +/- 0.02 Msun. From the broad spectral features we measure expansion velocities up to 47,000 km/s, higher than those of SNe 1998bw (GRB 980425) and 2006aj (GRB 060218). Helium absorption lines He I lambda5876 and He I 1.083 microm, blueshifted by ~20,000--30,000 km/s and ~28,000--38,000 km/s, respectively, may be present in the optical spectra. However, the lack of coverage of the He I 2.058 microm line prevents us from confirming such identifications. The nebular spectrum, taken at ~186 days after the explosion, shows a broad but faint [O I] emission at 6340 A. The light-curve shape and photospheric expansion velocities of SN 2010bh suggest that we witnessed a highly energetic explosion with a small ejected mass (E_k ~ 1e52 erg and M_ej ~ 3 Msun). The observed properties of SN 2010bh further extend the heterogeneity of the class of GRB supernovae.
[97]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.4265  [pdf] - 1117407
Detailed optical and near-infrared polarimetry, spectroscopy and broadband photometry of the afterglow of GRB 091018: Polarisation evolution
Comments: 20 pages, 14 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS. Some figures are reduced in quality to comply with arXiv size requirements
Submitted: 2012-03-19
[Abridged] A number of phenomena have been observed in GRB afterglows that defy explanation by simple versions of the standard fireball model, leading to a variety of new models. Polarimetry can be a major independent diagnostic of afterglow physics, probing the magnetic field properties and internal structure of the GRB jets. In this paper we present the first high quality multi-night polarimetric light curve of a Swift GRB afterglow, aimed at providing a well calibrated dataset of a typical afterglow to serve as a benchmark system for modelling afterglow polarisation behaviour. In particular, our dataset of the afterglow of GRB 091018 (at redshift z=0.971) comprises optical linear polarimetry (R band, 0.13 - 2.3 days after burst); circular polarimetry (R band) and near-infrared linear polarimetry (Ks band). We add to that high quality optical and near-infrared broadband light curves and spectral energy distributions as well as afterglow spectroscopy. The linear polarisation varies between 0 and 3%, with both long and short time scale variability visible. We find an achromatic break in the afterglow light curve, which corresponds to features in the polarimetric curve. We find that the data can be reproduced by jet break models only if an additional polarised component of unknown nature is present in the polarimetric curve. We probe the ordered magnetic field component in the afterglow through our deep circular polarimetry, finding P_circ < 0.15% (2 sigma), the deepest limit yet for a GRB afterglow, suggesting ordered fields are weak, if at all present. Our simultaneous R and Ks band polarimetry shows that dust induced polarisation in the host galaxy is likely negligible.
[98]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.0003  [pdf] - 1116987
The impact of selection biases on the Ep-Liso correlation of Gamma Ray Bursts
Comments: 7 pages, 5 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication by MNRAS
Submitted: 2012-02-29
We study the possible effects of selection biases on the Ep-Liso correlation caused by the unavoidable presence of flux-limits in the existing samples of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). We consider a well defined complete sample of Swift GRBs and perform Monte Carlo simulations of the GRB population under different assumptions for their luminosity functions. If we assume that there is no correlation between the peak energy Ep and the isotropic luminosity Liso, we are unable to reproduce it as due to the flux limit threshold of the Swift complete sample. We can reject the null hypothesis that there is no intrinsic correlation between Ep and Liso at more than 2.7 sigma level of confidence. This result is robust against the assumptions of our simulations and it is confirmed if we consider, instead of Swift, the trigger threshold of the Batse instrument. Therefore, there must be a physical relation between these two quantities. Our simulations seem to exclude, at a lower confidence level of 1.6 sigma, the possibility that the observed Ep-Liso correlation among different bursts is caused by a boundary, i.e. such that for any given Ep, we see only the largest Liso, which has a flux above the threshold of the current instruments.
[99]  oai:arXiv.org:1112.5111  [pdf] - 1092561
The X-ray absorbing column density of a complete sample of bright Swift Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: MNRAS, 6 pages, 3 figures, 1 table
Submitted: 2011-12-21, last modified: 2012-02-15
A complete sample of bright Swift Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs) has been recently selected by Salvaterra et al. (2011). The sample has a high level of completeness in redshift (91%). We derive here the intrinsic absorbing X-ray column densities of these GRBs making use of the Swift X-ray Telescope data. This distribution has a mean value of log(NH/cm-2)=21.7+-0.5. This value is consistent with the distribution of the column densities derived from the total sample of GRBs with redshift. We find a mild increase of the intrinsic column density with redshift. This can be interpreted as due to the contribution of intervening systems along the line of sight. Making use of the spectral index connecting optical and X-ray fluxes at 11 hr (beta_OX), we investigate the relation of the intrinsic column density and the GRB `darkness'. We find that there is a very tight correlation between dark GRBs and high X-ray column densities. This clearly indicates that the dark GRBs are formed in a metal-rich environment where dust must be present.
[100]  oai:arXiv.org:1112.4480  [pdf] - 1092495
The Dark Bursts population in a complete sample of bright Swift Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables. This version matches the published version in MNRAS
Submitted: 2011-12-19, last modified: 2012-02-14
We study the properties of the population of optically dark events present in a carefully selected complete sample of bright Swift long gamma-ray bursts. The high level of completeness in redshift of our sample (52 objects out of 58) allow us to establish the existence of a genuine dark population and we are able to estimate the maximum fraction of dark burst events (~30%) expected for the whole class of long gamma-ray burst. The redshift distribution of this population of dark bursts is similar to the one of the whole sample. Interestingly, the rest-frame X-ray luminosity (and the de-absorbed X-ray flux) of the sub-class of dark bursts is slightly higher than the average luminosity of the non-dark events. At the same time the prompt properties do not differ and the optical flux of dark events is at the lower tail of the optical flux distribution, corrected for Galactic absorption. All these properties suggest that dark bursts events generate in much denser environments with respect to normal bright events. We can therefore exclude the high-z and the low-density scenarios and conclude that the major cause of the origin of optically dark events is the dust extinction.
[101]  oai:arXiv.org:1112.4470  [pdf] - 1092489
A complete sample of bright Swift Long Gamma Ray Bursts: testing the spectral-energy correlations
Comments: MNRAS in press, 9 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables. This version matches the published version in MNRAS
Submitted: 2011-12-19, last modified: 2012-02-14
We use a nearly complete sample of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) detected by the Swift satellite to study the correlations between the spectral peak energy Ep of the prompt emission, the isotropic energetics Eiso and the isotropic luminosity Liso. This GRB sample is characterized by a high level of completeness in redshift (90%). This allows us to probe in an unbiased way the issue related to the physical origin of these correlations against selection effects. We find that one burst, GRB 061021, is an outlier to the Ep-Eiso correlation. Despite this case, we find strong Ep-Eiso and Ep-Liso correlations for the bursts of the complete sample. Their slopes, normalisations and dispersions are consistent with those found with the whole sample of bursts with measured redshift and Ep. This means that the biases present in the total sample commonly used to study these correlations do not affect their properties. Finally, we also find no evolution with redshift of the Ep-Eiso and Ep-Liso correlations.
[102]  oai:arXiv.org:1112.1700  [pdf] - 1092235
A complete sample of bright Swift Long Gamma-Ray Bursts: Sample presentation, Luminosity Function and evolution
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables; ApJ in press
Submitted: 2011-12-07, last modified: 2012-02-14
We present a carefully selected sub-sample of Swift Long Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs), that is complete in redshift. The sample is constructed by considering only bursts with favorable observing conditions for ground-based follow-up searches, that are bright in the 15-150 keV Swift/BAT band, i.e. with 1-s peak photon fluxes in excess to 2.6 ph s^-1 cm^-2. The sample is composed by 58 bursts, 52 of them with redshift for a completeness level of 90%, while another two have a redshift constraint, reaching a completeness level of 95%. For only three bursts we have no constraint on the redshift. The high level of redshift completeness allows us for the first time to constrain the GRB luminosity function and its evolution with cosmic times in a unbiased way. We find that strong evolution in luminosity (d_l=2.3\pm 0.6) or in density (d_d=1.7\pm 0.5) is required in order to account for the observations. The derived redshift distribution in the two scenarios are consistent with each other, in spite of their different intrinsic redshift distribution. This calls for other indicators to distinguish among different evolution models. Complete samples are at the base of any population studies. In future works we will use this unique sample of Swift bright GRBs to study the properties of the population of long GRBs.
[103]  oai:arXiv.org:1202.0280  [pdf] - 1116325
Discovery of a compact gas-rich DLA galaxy at z = 2.2: evidences for a starburst-driven outflow
Comments: 15 pages, 18 figures, 4 tables, accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Submitted: 2012-02-01
We present the detection of Ly-alpha, [OIII] and H-alpha emission associated with an extremely strong DLA system (N(HI) = 10^22.10 cm^-2) at z=2.207 towards the quasar SDSS J113520-001053. This is the largest HI column density ever measured along a QSO line of sight, though typical of what is seen in GRB-DLAs. This absorption system also classifies as ultrastrong MgII system with W2796_r=3.6 A. The mean metallicity of the gas ([Zn/H]=-1.1) and dust depletion factors ([Zn/Fe]=0.72, [Zn/Cr]=0.49) are consistent with (and only marginally larger than) the mean values found in the general QSO-DLA population. The [OIII]-Ha emitting region has a very small impact parameter with respect to the QSO line of sight, b=0.1", and is unresolved. From the Ha line, we measure SFR=25 Msun/yr. The Ly-a line is double-peaked and is spatially extended. More strikingly, the blue and red Ly-a peaks arise from distinct regions extended over a few kpc on either side of the star-forming region. We propose that this is the consequence of Ly-a transfer in outflowing gas. The presence of starburst-driven outflows is also in agreement with the large SFR together with a small size and low mass of the galaxy (Mvir~10^10 Msun). From the stellar UV continuum luminosity of the galaxy, we estimate an age of at most a few 10^7 yr, again consistent with a recent starburst scenario. We interpret the data as the observation of a young, gas rich, compact starburst galaxy, from which material is expelled through collimated winds powered by the vigorous star formation activity. We substantiate this picture by modelling the radiative transfer of Ly-a photons in the galactic counterpart. Though our model (a spherical galaxy with bipolar outflowing jets) is a simplistic representation of the true gas distribution and velocity field, the agreement between the observed and simulated properties is particularly good. [abridged]
[104]  oai:arXiv.org:1112.0018  [pdf] - 1092049
A minor body falling onto a neutron star as an explanation for the unusual gamma-ray burst GRB 101225A
Comments: Published in Nature on Dec 1, 2011. 3 pages, 1 figures (main paper). 15 pages, 4 figures (supplementary information)
Submitted: 2011-11-30
The tidal disruption of a solar mass star around a supermassive black hole has been extensively studied analytically and numerically. In these events the star develops into an elongated banana-shaped structure. After completing an eccentric orbit, the bound debris fall onto the black hole, forming an accretion disk and emitting radiation. The same process may occur on planetary scales, if a minor body orbits too close to its star. In the Solar System, comets fall directly onto our Sun or onto planets. If the star is a compact object, the minor body can become tidally disrupted. Indeed, one of the first mechanisms invoked to produce strong gamma-ray emission involved accretion of comets onto neutron stars in our Galaxy. Here we report that the peculiarities of the `Christmas' gamma-ray burst (GRB 101225A) can be explained by a tidal disruption event of a minor body around a Galactic isolated neutron star. This result would indicate either that minor bodies can be captured by compact stellar remnants more frequently than it occurs in our Solar System or that minor body formation is relatively easy around millisecond radio pulsars. A peculiar Supernova associated to a GRB may provide an alternative explanation.
[105]  oai:arXiv.org:1107.3841  [pdf] - 472535
GRB091127/SN2009nz and the VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of its host galaxy: probing the faint end of the mass-metallicity relation
Comments: 10 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in A&A. Major revision on the host metallicity
Submitted: 2011-07-19, last modified: 2011-09-24
We perform a detailed study of the gamma-ray burst GRB091127/SN2009nz host galaxy at z=0.490 using the VLT/X-shooter spectrograph in slit and integral-field unit (IFU). From the analysis of the optical and X-ray afterglow data obtained from ground-based telescopes and Swift-XRT we confirm the presence of a bump associated with SN2009nz and find evidence of a possible jet break in the afterglow lightcurve. The X-shooter afterglow spectra reveal several emission lines from the underlying host, from which we derive its integrated properties. These are in agreement with those of previously studied GRB-SN hosts and, more generally, with those of the long GRB host population. We use the Hubble Space Telescope and ground based images of the host to determine its stellar mass (M_star). Our results extend to lower M_star values the M-Z plot derived for the sample of long GRB hosts at 0.3<z<1.0 adding new information to probe the faint end of the M-Z relation and the shift of the LGRB host M-Z relation from that found from emission line galaxy surveys. Thanks to the IFU spectroscopy we can build the 2D velocity, velocity dispersion and star formation rate (SFR) maps. They show that the host galaxy has a perturbed rotation kinematics with evidence of a SFR enhancement consistent with the afterglow position.
[106]  oai:arXiv.org:1104.0844  [pdf] - 1053168
Gamma Ray Bursts as Probes of the Distant Universe
Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures. To appear in a special issue of Comptes Rendus Physique "GRB studies in the SVOM era", Eds. F. Daigne, G. Dubus
Submitted: 2011-04-05
We review recent results on the high-redshift universe and the cosmic evolution obtained using Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) as tracers of high-redshift galaxies. Most of the results come from photometric and spectroscopic observations of GRB host galaxies once the afterglow has faded away but also from the analysis of the GRB afterglow line of sight as revealed by absorptions in their optical spectrum.
[107]  oai:arXiv.org:1004.2919  [pdf] - 326577
Discovery of the nearby long, soft GRB 100316D with an associated supernova
Comments: 13 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2010-04-16, last modified: 2010-10-19
We report the Swift discovery of nearby long, soft gamma-ray burst GRB 100316D, and the subsequent unveiling of its low redshift host galaxy and associated supernova. We derive the redshift of the event to be z = 0.0591 +/- 0.0001 and provide accurate astrometry for the GRB-SN. We study the extremely unusual prompt emission with time-resolved gamma-ray to X-ray spectroscopy, and find that the spectrum is best modelled with a thermal component in addition to a synchrotron emission component with a low peak energy. The X-ray light curve has a remarkably shallow decay out to at least 800 s. The host is a bright, blue galaxy with a highly disturbed morphology and we use Gemini South, VLT and HST observations to measure some of the basic host galaxy properties. We compare and contrast the X-ray emission and host galaxy of GRB 100316D to a subsample of GRB-SNe. GRB 100316D is unlike the majority of GRB-SNe in its X-ray evolution, but resembles rather GRB 060218, and we find that these two events have remarkably similar high energy prompt emission properties. Comparison of the host galaxies of GRB-SNe demonstrates, however, that there is a great diversity in the environments in which GRB-SNe can be found. GRB 100316D is an important addition to the currently sparse sample of spectroscopically confirmed GRB-SNe, from which a better understanding of long GRB progenitors and the GRB--SN connection can be gleaned.
[108]  oai:arXiv.org:1008.0637  [pdf] - 1034080
A translucent interstellar cloud at z=2.69: CO, H2 and HD in the line-of-sight to SDSS J123714.60+064759.5
Comments: 17 pages, 21 figures, 8 tables, accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2010-08-03
We present the analysis of a sub-DLA system (log N(H^0)=20.0+/-0.15, z_abs=2.69) toward SDSS J123714+064759 (z_em=2.78). Using the VLT/UVES and X-shooter spectrographs, we detect H2, HD and CO molecules in absorption with log N(H2,HD,CO)=(19.21,14.48,14.17). The overall metallicity of the system is super-solar ([Zn/H]=+0.34) and iron is highly depleted ([Fe/Zn]=-1.39), revealing metal-rich and dusty gas. The strongest H2 component does not coincide with the centre of the HI absorption. This implies that the molecular fraction in this component, f=2N(H2)/(2N(H2)+N(H^0)), is larger than the mean molecular fraction <f>=1/4 in the system. This is supported by the detection of Cl^0 associated with this H2-component having N(Cl^0)/N(Cl^+)>0.4. Since Cl^0 is tied up to H2 by charge exchange reactions, this means that the molecular fraction in this component is not far from unity. The size of the molecular cloud is probably smaller than 1pc. Both the CO/H2=10^-5 and CO/C^0~1 ratios for f>0.24 indicate that the cloud classifies as translucent, i.e., a regime where carbon is found both in atomic and molecular form. The corresponding extinction, Av=0.14, albeit lower than the definition of a translucent sightline (based on extinction properties), is high for the observed H^0 column density. This means that intervening clouds with similar local properties but with larger column densities could be missed by current magnitude-limited QSO surveys. The excitation of CO is dominated by radiative interaction with the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) and we derive Tex(CO)=10.5+0.8-0.6 K when TCMBR(z=2.69)=10.05 K is expected. The astration factor of deuterium -with respect to the primordial D/H ratio- is only about 3. This can be the consequence of accretion of unprocessed gas from the intergalactic medium onto the associated galaxy. [abridged]
[109]  oai:arXiv.org:1007.5357  [pdf] - 268110
VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of the GRB 090926A afterglow
Comments: 12 pages, 8 .ps figures, accepted for publication in A&A. Abstract reduced due to space constraints
Submitted: 2010-07-29
The aim of this paper is to study the environment and intervening absorbers of the gamma-ray burst GRB 090926A through analysis of optical spectra of its afterglow. We analyze medium resolution spectroscopic observations (R=10 000, corresponding to 30 km/s, S/N=15 - 30 and wavelength range 3000-25000) of the optical afterglow of GRB 090926A, taken with X-shooter at the VLT ~ 22 hr after the GRB trigger. The spectrum shows that the ISM in the GRB host galaxy at z = 2.1071 is rich in absorption features, with two components contributing to the line profiles. In addition to the ground state lines, we detect C II, O I, Si II, Fe II and Ni II excited absorption features. No host galaxy emission lines, molecular absorption features nor diffuse interstellar bands are detected in the spectrum. The Hydrogen column density associated to GRB 090926A is log N_H/cm^{-2} = 21.60 +/- 0.07, and the metallicity of the host galaxy is in the range [X/H] =3.2X10^{-3}-1.2X10^{-2} with respect to the solar values, i.e., among the lowest values ever observed for a GRB host galaxy. A comparison with galactic chemical evolution models has suggested that the host of GRB090926A is likely to be a dwarf irregular galaxy. We put an upper limit to the Hydrogen molecular fraction of the host galaxy ISM, which is f < 7X10^{-7}. We derive information on the distance between the host absorbing gas and the site of the GRB explosion. The distance of component I is found to be 2.40 +/- 0.15 kpc, while component II is located far away from the GRB, possibly at ~ 5 kpc. These values are compatible with that found for other GRBs.
[110]  oai:arXiv.org:1007.4769  [pdf] - 261742
Challenging GRB models through the broadband dataset of GRB060908
Comments: A&A, in press. 11 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2010-07-27
Context: Multiwavelength observations of gamma-ray burst prompt and afterglow emission are a key tool to disentangle the various possible emission processes and scenarios proposed to interpret the complex gamma-ray burst phenomenology. Aims: We collected a large dataset on GRB060908 in order to carry out a comprehensive analysis of the prompt emission as well as the early and late afterglow. Methods: Data from Swift-BAT, -XRT and -UVOT together with data from a number of different ground-based optical/NIR and millimeter telescopes allowed us to follow the afterglow evolution from about a minute from the high-energy event down to the host galaxy limit. We discuss the physical parameters required to model these emissions. Results: The prompt emission of GRB060908 was characterized by two main periods of activity, spaced by a few seconds of low intensity, with a tight correlation between activity and spectral hardness. Observations of the afterglow began less than one minute after the high-energy event, when it was already in a decaying phase, and it was characterized by a rather flat optical/NIR spectrum which can be interpreted as due to a hard energy-distribution of the emitting electrons. On the other hand, the X-ray spectrum of the afterglow could be fit by a rather soft electron distribution. Conclusions: GRB060908 is a good example of a gamma-ray burst with a rich multi-wavelength set of observations. The availability of this dataset, built thanks to the joint efforts of many different teams, allowed us to carry out stringent tests for various interpretative scenarios showing that a satisfactorily modeling of this event is challenging. In the future, similar efforts will enable us to obtain optical/NIR coverage comparable in quality and quantity to the X-ray data for more events, therefore opening new avenues to progress gamma-ray burst research.
[111]  oai:arXiv.org:0911.3901  [pdf] - 902489
GRB 090313: X-shooter's first shot at a GRB
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics on the 20 January. 8 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables
Submitted: 2009-11-19, last modified: 2010-01-21
Context. X-shooter is the first second-generation instrument to become operative at the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT). It is a broad-band medium-resolution spectrograph designed with gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow spectroscopy as one of its main science drivers. Aims. During the first commissioning night on sky with the instrument fully assembled, X-shooter observed the afterglow of GRB 090313 as a demonstration of the instrument's capabilities. Methods. GRB 090313 was observed almost two days after the burst onset, when the object had already faded to R~21.6. Furthermore, the 90% illuminated Moon was just 30 degrees away from the field. In spite of the adverse conditions, we obtained a spectrum that, for the first time in GRB research, covers simultaneously the range from 5700 to 23000 Angstroms. Results. The spectrum shows multiple absorption features at a redshift of 3.3736, the redshift of the GRB. These features are composed of 3 components with different ionisation levels and velocities. Some of the features have never been observed before in a GRB at such a high redshift. Furthermore, we detect two intervening systems at redshifts of 1.8005 and 1.9597. Conclusions. These results demonstrate the potential of X-shooter in the GRB field, as it was capable of observing a GRB down to a magnitude limit that would include 72% of long GRB afterglows 2 hours after the burst onset. Coupled with the rapid response mode available at VLT, allowing reaction times of just a few minutes, X-shooter constitutes an important leap forward on medium resolution spectroscopic studies of GRBs, their host galaxies and intervening systems, probing the early history of the Universe.
[112]  oai:arXiv.org:0911.0046  [pdf] - 1018164
GRB090426: the farthest short gamma-ray burst?
Comments: Accepted for publication on A&A as a Letter to the Editor. 8 pages, 7 figures
Submitted: 2009-10-30
Aims. With an observed and rest-frame duration of < 2s and < 0.5s, respectively, GRB090426 could be classified as a short GRB. The prompt detection, both from space and ground-based telescopes, of a bright optical counterpart to this GRB offered a unique opportunity to complete a detailed study. Methods. Based on an extensive ground-based observational campaign, we obtained the spectrum of the optical afterglow of GRB090426, measuring its redshift and obtaining information about the medium in which the event took place. We completed follow-up observation of the afterglow optical light curve down to the brightness level of the host galaxy that we firmly identified and studied. We also retrieved and analyzed all the available high-energy data of this event, and compared the results with our findings in the optical. This represents one of the most detailed studies of a short-duration event presented so far. Results. The time properties qualify GRB090426 as a short burst. In this case, its redshift of z = 2.61 would be the highest yet found for a GRB of this class. On the other hand, the spectral and energy properties are more similar to those of long bursts. LBT late-time deep imaging identifies a star-forming galaxy at a redshift consistent with that of the GRB. The afterglow lies within the light of its host and shows evidence of local absorption.
[113]  oai:arXiv.org:0906.3269  [pdf] - 1002597
Statistics and characteristics of MgII absorbers along GRB lines of sight observed with VLT-UVES
Comments: 12 pages, 10 figures; accepted for publication in A&A (12 June 2009)
Submitted: 2009-06-17, last modified: 2009-06-28
We analyse the properties of MgII absorption systems detected along the sightlines toward GRBs using a sample of 10 GRB afterglow spectra obtained with VLT-UVES over the past six years. The S/N ratio is sufficiently high that we can extend previous studies to smaller equivalent widths (typically Wr>0.3A). Over a pathlength of Delta(z)~14 the number of weak absorbers detected is similar along GRB and QSO lines of sight, while the number of strong systems is larger along GRB lines of sight with a 2-sigma significance. Using intermediate and low resolution observations reported in the literature, we increase the absorption length for strong systems to Delta(z)=31.5 (about twice the path length of previous studies) and find that the number density of strong MgII systems is a factor of 2.1+/-0.6 higher (about 3-sigma significance) toward GRBs as compared to QSOs, about twice smaller however than previously reported. We divide the sample in three redshift bins and we find that the number density of strong MgII is larger in the low redshift bins. We investigate in detail the properties of strong MgII systems observed with UVES. Both the estimated dust extinction in strong GRB MgII systems and the equivalent width distribution are consistent with what is observed for standard QSO systems. We find also that the number density of (sub)-DLAs per unit redshift in the UVES sample is probably twice larger than what is expected from QSO sightlines which confirms the peculiarity of GRB lines of sight. These results indicate that neither a dust extinction bias nor different beam sizes of the sources are viable explanations for the excess. It is still possible that the current sample of GRB lines of sight is biased by a subtle gravitational lensing effect. More data and larger samples are needed to test this hypothesis. (abridged)
[114]  oai:arXiv.org:0906.3187  [pdf] - 1002594
UVES/VLT high resolution absorption spectroscopy of the GRB080330 afterglow: a study of the GRB host galaxy and intervening absorbers
Comments: 8 Pages, 7 ps figures, A&A in press
Submitted: 2009-06-17
We study the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) environment and intervening absorbers by analyzing the optical absorption features produced by gas surrounding the GRB or along its line of sight. We analyzed high resolution spectroscopic observations (R=40000, S/N=3 - 6) of the optical afterglow of GRB080330, taken with UVES at the VLT ~ 1.5 hours after the GRB trigger. The spectrum illustrates the complexity of the ISM of the GRB host galaxy at z = 1.51 which has at least four components in the main absorption system. We detect strong FeII, SiII, and NiII excited absorption lines associated with the bluemost component only. In addition to the host galaxy, at least two more absorbers lying along the line of sight to the afterglow have been detected in the redshift range 0.8 < z < 1.1, each exhibiting MgII absorption. For the bluemost component in the host galaxy, we derive information about its distance from the site of the GRB explosion. We do so by assuming that the excited absorption lines are produced by indirect UV pumping, and compare the data with a time dependent photo-excitation code. The distance of this component is found to be 280+40-50 pc, which is lower than found for other GRBs (1 - 6 kpc). We identify two additional MgII absorbers, one of them with a rest frame equivalent width larger than 1A. The distance between the GRB and the absorber measured in this paper confirms that the power of the GRB radiation can influence the conditions of the interstellar medium up to a distance of at least several hundred pc. For the intervening absorbers, we confirm the trend that on average one strong intervening system is found per afterglow, as has been noted in studies exhibiting an excess of strong MgII absorbers along GRB sightlines compared to quasars.
[115]  oai:arXiv.org:0811.0989  [pdf] - 133430
Probing the complex environments of GRB host galaxies and intervening systems: high resolution spectroscopy of GRB050922C
Comments: 11 pages, 12 figures, accepted by A&A
Submitted: 2008-11-06
The aim of this paper is to investigate the environment of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) and the interstellar matter of their host galaxies. We use to this purpose high resolution spectroscopic observations of the afterglow of GRB050922C, obtained with UVES/VLT 3.5 hours after the GRB event. We found that, as for most high resolution spectra of GRBs, the spectrum of the afterglow of GRB050922C is complex. At least seven components contribute to the main absorption system at z=2.1992. The detection of lines of neutral elements like MgI and the detection of fine-structure levels of the ions FeII, SiII and CII allows us to separate components in the GRB ISM along the line of sight. Moreover, in addition to the main system, we have analyzed the five intervening systems between z = 2.077 and z = 1.5664 identified along the GRB line of sight. GRB afterglow spectra are very complex, but full of information. This can be used to disentangle the contribution of the different parts of the GRB host galaxy and to study their properties. Our metallicity estimates agree with the scenario of GRBs exploding in low metallicity galaxies
[116]  oai:arXiv.org:0807.1348  [pdf] - 14336
The short GRB070707 afterglow and its very faint host galaxy
Comments: 6 pages, 5 figures, accepted by A&A
Submitted: 2008-07-08, last modified: 2008-09-12
We present the results from an ESO/VLT campaign aimed at studying the afterglow properties of the short/hard gamma ray burst GRB 070707. Observations were carried out at ten different epochs from ~0.5 to ~80 days after the event. The optical flux decayed steeply with a power-law decay index greater than 3, later levelling off at R~27.3 mag; this is likely the emission level of the host galaxy, the faintest yet detected for a short GRB. Spectroscopic observations did not reveal any line features/edges that could unambiguously pinpoint the GRB redshift, but set a limit z < 3.6. In the range of allowed redshifts, the host has a low luminosity, comparable to that of long-duration GRBs. The existence of such faint host galaxies suggests caution when associating short GRBs with bright, offset galaxies, where the true host might just be too dim for detection. The steepness of the decay of the optical afterglow of GRB 070707 challenges external shock models for the optical afterglow of short/hard GRBs. We argue that this behaviour might results from prolonged activity of the central engine or require alternative scenarios.
[117]  oai:arXiv.org:0804.4367  [pdf] - 12131
The complex light-curve of the afterglow of GRB071010A
Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures, MNRAS, in press
Submitted: 2008-04-28
We present and discuss the results of an extensive observational campaign devoted to GRB071010A, a long-duration gamma-ray burst detected by the Swift satellite. This event was followed for almost a month in the optical/near-infrared (NIR) with various telescopes starting from about 2min after the high-energy event. Swift-XRT observations started only later at about 0.4d. The light-curve evolution allows us to single out an initial rising phase with a maximum at about 7min, possibly the afterglow onset in the context of the standard fireball model, which is then followed by a smooth decay interrupted by a sharp rebrightening at about 0.6d. The rebrightening was visible in both the optical/NIR and X-rays and can be interpreted as an episode of discrete energy injection, although various alternatives are possible. A steepening of the afterglow light curve is recorded at about 1d. The entire evolution of the optical/NIR afterglow is consistent with being achromatic. This could be one of the few identified GRB afterglows with an achromatic break in the X-ray through the optical/NIR bands. Polarimetry was also obtained at about 1d, just after the rebrightening and almost coincident with the steepening. This provided a fairly tight upper limit of 0.9% for the polarized-flux fraction.
[118]  oai:arXiv.org:0704.0265  [pdf] - 45
REM near-IR and optical multiband observations of PKS2155-304 in 2005
Comments: This paper is the corrected version of the paper published in A&A 469 503. It contains the material in the "Errata Corrrige", in press in A&A
Submitted: 2007-04-02, last modified: 2007-10-30
Spectral variability is the main tool for constraining emission models of BL Lac objects. By means of systematic observations of the BL Lac prototype PKS 2155-304 in the infrared-optical band, we explore variability on the scales of months, days and hours. We made our observations with the robotic 60 cm telescope REM located at La Silla, Chile. VRIJHK filters were used. PKS 2155-304 was observed from May to December 2005. The wavelength interval explored, the total number of photometric points and the short integration time render our photometry substantially superior to previous ones for this source. On the basis of the intensity and colour we distinguish three different states of the source, each of duration of months, which include all those described in the literature. In particular, we report the highest state ever detected in the H band. The source varied by a factor of 4 in this band, much more than in the V band (a factor ~2). The source softened with increasing intensity, contrary to the general pattern observed in the UV-X-ray bands. On five nights of November we had nearly continuous monitoring for 2-3 hours. A variability episode with a time scale of ~24 h is well documented, a much more rapid flare with t=1-2 h, is also apparent, but is supported by relatively few points.
[119]  oai:arXiv.org:0710.0727  [pdf] - 588660
The afterglow onset for GRB060418 and GRB060607A
Comments: This contribution is part of the proceedings of the Frascati Workshop 2007, edited by F. Giovannelli and L. Sabau-Graziati, published in a special volume of the Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ChJAA)
Submitted: 2007-10-03
Gamma-ray burst are thought to be produced by highly relativistic outflows. Although upper and lower limits for the outflow initial Lorentz factor $\Gamma_0$ are available, observational efforts to derive a direct determination of $\Gamma_0$ have so far failed or provided ambiguous results. As a matter of fact, the shape of the early-time afterglow light curve is strongly sensitive on $\Gamma_0$ which determines the time of the afterglow peak, i.e. when the outflow and the shocked circumburst material share a comparable amount of energy. We now comment early-time observations of the near-infrared afterglows of GRB 060418 and GRB 060607A performed by the REM robotic telescope. For both events, the afterglow peak was singled out and allowed us to determine the initial fireball Lorentz, $\Gamma_0\sim 400$.
[120]  oai:arXiv.org:0706.1273  [pdf] - 2044
Multicolor observations of the afterglow of the short/hard GRB 050724
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables, accepted for publication in A&A, typo fixed
Submitted: 2007-06-08, last modified: 2007-09-04
New information on short/hard gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is being gathered thanks to the discovery of their optical and X-ray afterglows. However, some key aspects are still poorly understood, including the collimation level of the outflow, the duration of the central engine activity, and the properties of the progenitor systems. We want to constrain the physical properties of the short GRB 050724 and of its host galaxy, and make some inferences on the global short GRB population. We present optical observations of the afterglow of GRB 050724 and of its host galaxy, significantly expanding the existing dataset for this event. We compare our results with models, complementing them with available measurements from the literature. We study the afterglow light curve and spectrum including X-ray data. We also present observations of the host galaxy. The observed optical emission was likely related to the large flare observed in the X-ray light curve. The apparent steep decay was therefore not due to the jet effect. Available data are indeed consistent with low collimation, in turn implying a large energy release, comparable to that of long GRBs. The flare properties also constrain the internal shock mechanism, requiring a large Lorentz factor contrast between the colliding shells. This implies that the central engine was active at late times, rather than ejecting all shells simultaneously. The host galaxy has red colors and no ongoing star formation, consistent with previous findings on this GRB. However, it is not a pure elliptical, and has some faint spiral structure. GRB 050724 provides the most compelling case for association between a short burst and a galaxy with old stellar population. It thus plays a pivotal role in constraining progenitors models, which should allow for long delays between birth and explosion.
[121]  oai:arXiv.org:0708.1383  [pdf] - 3885
GRB 070311: a direct link between the prompt emission and the afterglow
Comments: 14 pages, 11 figures, 4 tables, accepted to A&A
Submitted: 2007-08-10
We present prompt gamma-ray, early NIR/optical, late optical and X-ray observations of the peculiar GRB 070311 discovered by INTEGRAL, in order to gain clues on the mechanisms responsible for the prompt gamma-ray pulse as well as for the early and late multi-band afterglow of GRB 070311. We fitted with empirical functions the gamma-ray and optical light curves and scaled the result to the late time X-rays. The H-band light curve taken by REM shows two pulses peaking 80 and 140 s after the peak of the gamma-ray burst and possibly accompanied by a faint gamma-ray tail. Remarkably, the late optical and X-ray afterglow underwent a major rebrightening between 3x10^4 and 2x10^5 s after the burst with an X-ray fluence comparable with that of the prompt emission extrapolated in the same band. Notably, the time profile of the late rebrightening can be described as the combination of a time-rescaled version of the prompt gamma-ray pulse and an underlying power law. This result supports a common origin for both prompt and late X-ray/optical afterglow rebrightening of GRB 070311 within the external shock scenario. The main fireball would be responsible for the prompt emission, while a second shell would produce the rebrightening when impacting the leading blastwave in a refreshed shock (abridged).
[122]  oai:arXiv.org:0706.1772  [pdf] - 1937469
The GRB afterglow onset observed by REM: fireball Lorentz factor and afterglow fluence
Comments: 4 pages, 1 figure, to appear in New Astronomy Reviews, proceedings of "070228: The Next Decade of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows", Amsterdam, 2007 March 19-23, eds. R.A.M.J. Wijers, L. Kaper, E. van Eerten
Submitted: 2007-06-12
We report observations of the early light curves of GRB 060418 and GRB 060607A, carried out with the pink robotic telescope REM. A clear peak is detected for both events, which is interpreted as the onset of the afterglow, that is the time at which the fireball starts decelerating. This detection allows to directly measure the initial fireball Lorentz factor, which was found to be Gamma_0 ~ 400 for both events, fully confirming the ultrarelativistic nature of gamma-ray burst fireballs. Sampling the light curve before the peak also allows to compute the bolometric fluence of the afterglow, which is 16% of the prompt one in the case of GRB 060418.
[123]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612607  [pdf] - 87945
REM observations of GRB 060418 and GRB 060607A: the onset of the afterglow and the initial fireball Lorentz factor determination
Comments: 6 pages, 3 color figures, 3 tables (including two online); discussion significantly extended, results unchanged; accepted for publication in A&A Letters
Submitted: 2006-12-20, last modified: 2007-04-24
Gamma-ray burst (GRB) emission is believed to originate in highly relativistic fireballs. Currently, only lower limits were securely set to the initial fireball Lorentz factor Gamma_0. We aim to provide a direct measure of Gamma_0. The early-time afterglow light curve carries information about Gamma_0, which determines the time of the afterglow peak. We have obtained early observations of the near-infrared afterglows of GRB 060418 and GRB 060607A with the REM robotic telescope. For both events, the afterglow peak could be clearly singled out, allowing a firm determination of the fireball Lorentz of Gamma_0 ~ 400, fully confirming the highly relativistic nature of GRB fireballs. The deceleration radius was inferred to be R_dec ~ 10^17 cm. This is much larger than the internal shocks radius (believed to power the prompt emission), thus providing further evidence for a different origin of the prompt and afterglow stages of the GRB.
[124]  oai:arXiv.org:0704.0958  [pdf] - 199
Simultaneous Swift and REM monitoring of the blazar PKS0537-441 in 2005
Comments: 24 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables, in press in the ApJ
Submitted: 2007-04-06
The blazar PKS0537-441 has been observed by Swift between the end of 2004 and November 2005. The BAT monitored it recurrently for a total of 2.7 Ms, and the XRT and UVOT pointed it on seven occasions for a total of 67 ks, making it one of the AGNs best monitored by Swift. The automatic optical and infrared telescope REM has monitored simultaneously the source at all times. In January-February 2005 PKS0537-441 has been detected at its brightest in optical and X-rays: more than a factor of 2 brighter in X-rays and about a factor 60 brighter in the optical than observed in December 2004. The July 2005 observation recorded a fainter X-ray state. The simultaneous optical state, monitored by both Swift UVOT and REM, is high, and in the VRI bands it is comparable to what was recorded in early January 2005, before the outburst. In November 2005, the source subsided both in X-rays and optical to a quiescent state, having decreased by factors of ~4 and ~60 with respect to the January-February 2005 outburst, respectively. Our monitoring shows an overall well correlated optical and X-ray decay. On the shorter time scales (days or hours), there is no obvious correlation between X-ray and optical variations, but the former tend to be more pronounced, opposite to what is observed on monthly time scales. The widely different amplitude of the long term variability in optical and X-rays is very unusual and makes this observation a unique case study for blazar activity. The spectral energy distributions are interpreted in terms of the synchrotron and inverse Compton mechanisms within a jet where the plasma radiates via internal shocks and the dissipation depends on the distance of the emitting region from the central engine (abridged).
[125]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609825  [pdf] - 133764
UVES/VLT high resolution spectroscopy of GRB 050730 afterglow: probing the features of the GRB environment
Comments: 11 pages, 15 postscript figures, accepted for pubblication in A&A
Submitted: 2006-09-29, last modified: 2007-02-26
We analyze high resolution spectroscopic observations of the optical afterglow of GRB050730, obtained with UVES@VLT about hours after the GRB trigger. The spectrum shows that the ISM of the GRB host galaxy at z = 3.967 is complex, with at least five components contributing to the main absorption system. We detect strong CII*, SiII*, OI* and FeII* fine structure absorption lines associated to the second and third component. For the first three components we derive information on the relative distance from the site of the GRB explosion. Component 1, which has the highest redshift, does not present any fine structure nor low ionization lines; it only shows very high ionization features, such as CIV and OVI, suggesting that this component is very close to the GRB site. From the analysis of low and high ionization lines and fine structure lines, we find evidences that the distance of component 2 from the site of the GRB explosion is 10-100 times smaller than that of component 3. We evaluated the mean metallicity of the z=3.967 system obtaining values about 0.01 of the solar metallicity or less. However, this should not be taken as representative of the circumburst medium, since the main contribution to the hydrogen column density comes from the outer regions of the galaxy while that of the other elements presumably comes from the ISM closer to the GRB site. Furthermore, difficulties in evaluating dust depletion correction can modify significantly these values. The mean [C/Fe] ratio agrees well with that expected by single star-formation event models. Interestingly the [C/Fe] of component 2 is smaller than that of component 3, in agreement with GRB dust destruction scenarios, if component 2 is closer than component 3 to the GRB site.
[126]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701688  [pdf] - 260856
REM observations of GRB 060418: the fireball Lorentz factor determination
Comments: 2 pages, 1 eps figure. Proceedings of the "Swift and GRBs: Unveiling the Relativistic Universe" meeting, Venice, June 5-9, 2006, to be published by "Il Nuovo Cimento"
Submitted: 2007-01-24
We measured the fireball Lorentz factor of GRB 060418 by the direct observation of the onset of the NIR afterglow carried with the REM telescope. We found a value of about 400.
[127]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701591  [pdf] - 260853
Swift GRBs: the early afterglow spectral energy distribution
Comments: To be published in the proceedings of the conference "SWIFT and GRBs: Unveiling the Relativistic Universe", Venice, June 5-9, 2006. To appear in Il Nuovo Cimento, 8 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2007-01-20
We present the first results of a program to systematically study the optical-to-X-ray spectral energy distribution (SED) of Swift GRB afterglows with known redshift. The goal is to study the properties of the GRB explosion and of the intervening absorbing material. In this report we present the preliminary analysis on 23 afterglows. Thanks to Swift, we could build the SED at early times after the GRB (minutes to hours). We derived the Hydrogen column densities and the spectral slopes from the X-ray spectrum. We then constrained the visual extinction by requiring that the combined optical/X-ray SED is due to synchrotron, namely either a single power law or a broken power law with a slope change by 0.5. We confirm a low dust-to-metal ratio, smaller than in the SMC, even from the analysis of data taken significantly earlier than previously possible. Our analysis does not support the existence of ``grey'' dust. We also find that the synchrotron spectrum works remarkably well to explain afterglow SEDs. We clearly see, however, that during the X-ray steep decay phases and the flares, the X-ray radiation cannot be due only to afterglow emission.
[128]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701558  [pdf] - 88687
UVES - VLT High Resolution Spectroscopy of GRB Afterglows
Comments: 8 pages, 11 figure, To appear in "The Multicoloured Landscape of Compact Objects and their Explosive Progenitors: Theory vs Observations" (Cefalu, Sicily, June 2006). Eds. L. Burderi et al. (New York: AIP)
Submitted: 2007-01-19
We present early time, high resolution spectroscopy of three GRB afterglows: GRB050730, GRB050922C and GRB060418. These data give us precious information on the kinematics, ionization and metallicity of the interstellar matter of GRB host galaxies up to a redshift z = 4, and of intervening absorbers along the line of sight. The absorption spectra show that elements are present both with high and low ionization states, and even forbidden, fine structure levels are commonly observed. These features allow us to evaluate the physical parameters of the absorbing gas. In details, the density of the gas regions lie in the range n = 10 - 10^6 cm-3, and the temperatures are of the order of T = 10^3 - 10^4 K. The metallicity of the GRB host galaxies is computed using the hydrogen absorption features. We find undersolar abundances for our GRBs, namely, Z = 0.001 - 0.01. However, depletion has not been considered. It can be taken into account using as metallicity indicators Zn and Cr, which tend to remain in the gas phase. We find metallicities higher than the previous values and in agreement with other measurements for GRB host galaxies. Finally, the observed [C/Fe] ratio for GRB050730 (z = 3.967) agrees with values expected for a galaxy younger than a Gyr undergoing bursts of star-formation. In addition, the [C/Fe] ratio evaluated component by component can give informations on the relative distances of the components from the GRB explosion site, since Fe dust is more efficiently destroyed than graphite.
[129]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612643  [pdf] - 260842
Achromatic Breaks for Swift GRBs: Any Evidence?
Comments: Proceedings of the international conference Swift and GRBs: Unveiling the Relativistic Universe - Venice, 5-9 June 2006 - To appear in "Il Nuovo Cimento"
Submitted: 2006-12-21
The availability of multi-wavelength high-quality data of gamma-ray burst afterglows in the Swift era, contrary to the expectations, did not allow us to fully confirm yet one of the most fundamental features of the standard afterglow picture: the presence of an achromatic break in the decaying light curve. We briefly review the most interesting cases identified so far.
[130]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310184  [pdf] - 59847
Dust and dark Gamma-Ray Bursts: mutual implications
Comments: 16 pages, 8 figures, accepted by A&A
Submitted: 2003-10-07
In a cosmological context dust has been always poorly understood. That is true also for the statistic of GRBs so that we started a program to understand its role both in relation to GRBs and in function of z. This paper presents a composite model in this direction. The model considers a rather generic distribution of dust in a spiral galaxy and considers the effect of changing some of the parameters characterizing the dust grains, size in particular. We first simulated 500 GRBs distributed as the host galaxy mass distribution, using as model the Milky Way. If we consider dust with the same properties as that we observe in the Milky Way, we find that due to absorption we miss about 10% of the afterglows assuming we observe the event within about 1 hour or even within 100s. In our second set of simulations we placed GRBs randomly inside giants molecular clouds, considering different kinds of dust inside and outside the host cloud and the effect of dust sublimation caused by the GRB inside the clouds. In this case absorption is mainly due to the host cloud and the physical properties of dust play a strong role. Computations from this model agree with the hypothesis of host galaxies with extinction curve similar to that of the Small Magellanic Cloud, whereas the host cloud could be also characterized by dust with larger grains. To confirm our findings we need a set of homogeneous infrared observations. The use of coming dedicated infrared telescopes, like REM, will provide a wealth of cases of new afterglow observations.